GEANT4 is used for simulating: RICH testbeam data, HCAL testbeam data. GAUSS Project: LHCb Simulation using GEANT4 with GAUDI.

Similar documents
TORCH: A large-area detector for precision time-of-flight measurements at LHCb

Status of the TORCH time-of-flight detector

SiPMs for Čerenkov imaging

TORCH. A Cherenkov based Time of Flight detector. Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration

Variation of Refractive Index inside an Aerogel Block

Analogue, Digital and Semi-Digital Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE AHCAL

Scintillators and photodetectors. 1. Generation of Optical Photons 2. Transport of Optical Photons 3. Detection of Optical Photons

The LHCb upgrade. Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade main drivers Overview of the sub-detector modifications Conclusions

A proximity focusing RICH with time-of-flight capabilities

RICH12 Update: Simulations

First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator

Production and Quality Assurance of Detector Modules for the LHCb Silicon Tracker

Endcap Modules for the ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker

8.882 LHC Physics. Track Reconstruction and Fitting. [Lecture 8, March 2, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

Simulation Study for EUDET Pixel Beam Telescope using ILC Software

Design of the TORCH detector A Cherenkov based Time-of-Flight system for particle identification. Maarten Willibrord Uriël van Dijk

Determination of the aperture of the LHCb VELO RF foil

Track reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment based on a novel Multiple Scattering fit Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration

Beam test measurements of the Belle II vertex detector modules

Full Offline Reconstruction in Real Time with the LHCb Detector

CLAS12- RICH Project Mid- term Review AEROGEL. Marco Contalbrigo INFN Ferrara JLab, October 13 th 2015

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Cherenkov Radiation. Doctoral Thesis. Rok Dolenec. Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Samo Korpar

Course Updates. Reminders: 1) Assignment #12 due today. 2) Polarization, dispersion. 3) Last HW (#13 posted) due Monday, May 3rd

The LHCb Upgrade. LHCC open session 17 February Large Hadron Collider Physics (LHCP) Conference New York, 2-7 June 2014

Simulation study for the EUDET pixel beam telescope

Time and position resolution of high granularity, high counting rate MRPC for the inner zone of the CBM-TOF wall

First Operational Experience from the LHCb Silicon Tracker

TORCH - Cherenkov and Time-of-Flight PID Detector for the LHCb upgrade at CERN. Klaus Föhl, CERN

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)492. Performance and recent developments of the real-time track reconstruction and alignment of the LHCb detector.

Performance of FPCCD vertex detector. T. Nagamine Tohoku University Feb 6, 2007 ACFA 9, IHEP,Beijin

LHC-B. 60 silicon vertex detector elements. (strips not to scale) [cm] [cm] = 1265 strips

EUDET Telescope Geometry and Resolution Studies

PXD Simulation and Optimisation Studies

Adding timing to the VELO

Event reconstruction in STAR

Light: Geometric Optics

A New Segment Building Algorithm for the Cathode Strip Chambers in the CMS Experiment

Lecture 24 EM waves Geometrical optics

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 11 Mar 2002

The design and performance of a prototype water Cherenkov optical time-projection chamber

Simulating the RF Shield for the VELO Upgrade

The CLICdp Optimization Process

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 13 Jan 2015

Diffraction. Single-slit diffraction. Diffraction by a circular aperture. Chapter 38. In the forward direction, the intensity is maximal.

Performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector at the LHC

The AMS-02 Anticoincidence Counter. Philip von Doetinchem I. Phys. Inst. B, RWTH Aachen for the AMS-02 Collaboration DPG, Freiburg March 2008

Direct photon measurements in ALICE. Alexis Mas for the ALICE collaboration

Image Diode APPLICATIONS KEY ATTRIBUTES

MIP Reconstruction Techniques and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering

The Phase-2 ATLAS ITk Pixel Upgrade

arxiv:hep-ex/ v2 7 Aug 1995

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.ins-det] 18 Dec 1998

ATLAS Dr. C. Lacasta, Dr. C. Marinas

Modules and Front-End Electronics Developments for the ATLAS ITk Strips Upgrade

Track Reconstruction

6-1 LECTURE #6: OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF SOLIDS. Basic question: How do solids interact with light? The answers are linked to:

Forward Time-of-Flight Detector Efficiency for CLAS12

THE PANDA BARREL DIRC DETECTOR

Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Integrated CMOS sensor technologies for the CLIC tracker

05/09/07 CHEP2007 Stefano Spataro. Simulation and Event Reconstruction inside the PandaRoot Framework. Stefano Spataro. for the collaboration

PoS(High-pT physics09)036

Extremely Fast Detector for 511 kev Gamma

G4beamline Simulations for H8

Timing properties of MCP-PMT

Chapter 2: Wave Optics

FastSim tutorial for beginners

HLT Hadronic L0 Confirmation Matching VeLo tracks to L0 HCAL objects

Stefania Beolè (Università di Torino e INFN) for the ALICE Collaboration. TIPP Chicago, June 9-14

Expected Performances of the scintillator counters Time Of Flight system of the AMS-02 experiment

Progress on G4 FDIRC Simulation. Doug Roberts University of Maryland

ATLAS ITk Layout Design and Optimisation

THE PANDA BARREL DIRC DETECTOR

Locating the neutrino interaction vertex with the help of electronic detectors in the OPERA experiment

Chapter 38. Diffraction Patterns and Polarization

A Novel Strip Energy Splitting Algorithm for the Fine Granular Readout of a Scintillator Strip Electromagnetic Calorimeter

X-Ray fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy

CMS Simulation Software

Quad Module Hybrid Development for the ATLAS Pixel Layer Upgrade

Detector Response Simulation

Velo readout board RB3. Common L1 board (ROB)

10 psec Time-Of-Flight Counter

HW Chapter 20 Q 2,3,4,5,6,10,13 P 1,2,3. Chapter 20. Classic and Modern Optics. Dr. Armen Kocharian

PMT Candidates for SSD Challenge for PMTs in air-shower detection highest linear dynamic range

Performance of the GlueX Detector Systems

Chapter 82 Example and Supplementary Problems

A New Model for Optical Crosstalk in SinglePhoton Avalanche Diodes Arrays

10.5 Polarization of Light

Update of the SoLID Cerenkov detector for PVDIS: CSI coated GEM option August, 03, Eric Fuchey Temple University

Validation of the front-end electronics and firmware for LHCb vertex locator.

Alignment of the CMS Silicon Tracker

A Novel Strip Energy Splitting Algorithm for the Fine Granular Readout of a Scintillator Strip Electromagnetic Calorimeter

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Nov 2010

Applying Machine Learning for bb-decay Identification

The branch of physics which studies light

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Jefferson Lab

Studies of the KS and KL lifetimes and

The LHCb VERTEX LOCATOR performance and VERTEX LOCATOR upgrade

Gridpix: TPC development on the right track. The development and characterisation of a TPC with a CMOS pixel chip read out Fransen, M.

Transcription:

Status of GEANT4 in LHCb S. Easo, RAL, 30-9-2002 The LHCbexperiment. GEANT4 is used for simulating: RICH testbeam data, HCAL testbeam data. GAUSS Project: LHCb Simulation using GEANT4 with GAUDI. Summary.

LHCb Experiment Precision Measurements of CP violation in the B Meson System. Large Sample of Events with B d and B s Mesons. Most of the b hadrons are produced at small polar angles. LHCb: Single Forward Arm Spectrometer with Open Geometry. From the CP asymmetries in the final states of B-meson decays, Measure CKM Angles. This design is being modified to optimize the performance of LHCb.

RICH detectors in LHCb To identify charged particles in the momentum range 1-150 GeV/c. Two detectors: RICH1, RICH2. Momentum range RICH1: Aerogel 2 10 GeV/c C 4 F 10 < 70 GeV/c RICH2: CF 4 <150 GeV/c. Photo Detectors: Baseline solution- HybridPhotodiodes (HPD). RICH test beam presented: To test the performance of the Aerogel radiator.

Test beam Set-up at CERN Beam from CERN-PS: p and p/p in the range 6 10 GeV/c (? p/p = 1%)

Hybrid Photo Detectors Bialkali photocathode, K2CsSb Fountain shaped electric field, demagnification factor 2.3 Silicon pad sensor 2048 pixels (16 sectors x 128 pads 1x1 mm² 2.3x2.3 mm² granularity on ph.cathode) AEROGEL test beam Quantum Efficiency of the 4 photocathodes > 20% (λ=280-380nm)

Simulation of the Testbeam Setup using GEANT4. Mirror Rad. of Curvature=1185 mm. Four Pad Hpds are used. Hpd Mirror Vessel Aerogel Filter

Optical Transmission in Aerogel Rayleigh Scattered Photons Green Lines: Photons. Photons Transmitted without Scattering

Verification of Aerogel and Filter Transmissions Generate Photons: With a uniform wavelength distribution from 170 to 950 nm. Uniform X and Y coordinates of origin. With Z coordinate of origin at 180mm (upstream of Aerogel). With direction along the Z axis. An Aerogel Tile simulated with: A=0.9368, C=0.00719 micrometer**4/cm. C=Clarity, A=Surface scattering constant. Transmission = A exp(-c * thickness/ wavelength **4 ).

Verification of Aerogel Transmission Red: Photons incident on Aerogel Tile Blue: Photons transmitted out of aerogel from the opposite side, but in the same direction. nm Black: Blue/Red Green: Expected Transmission. Photon wavelength in nm nm

Cherenkov Radiation in Aerogel Typical Run Configuration in the Testbeam: 9 GeV/c Pions. One Novosibirsk Aerogel Tile with thickness = 4 cm. Filter: Glass D263. Nitrogen Gas at 1 bar and 292 Kelvin in the Vessel.

Refractive Index of Aerogel Novosibirsk Tile 7*8*4 cm. At 400 nm, Ref.Index=1.03066.

A Typical event in the Testbeam Red lines: Charged particle Green lines : Photons.

Cherenkov Radius on the Photocathode Peak at 146.4 mm. Tails from Rayleigh Scattered Photons. Radius in mm.

Photoelectric Effect at the HPD. Standard Geant4 processes not applicable in this case. A Special class created to generate the photoelectrons, which is derived from a GEANT4 base class. This process uses the quantum efficiency data and the results of Fountain focussing tests. Electron Energy: High Voltage applied. Direction: From Fountain focussing. The quantum efficieny data includes the loss of photons by reflection at the Hpd quartz window surface.

Photoelectric Effect at the HPD. Red lines: Charged particles Green lines : Photons HPD Quartz Window, Silicon detector.

Hit Creation in the Si Detector. Implemented using a special process class since the standard Geant4 procedure somewhat too complicated for this purpose. The Photoelectrons loose all their energy in the Silicon. The backscattering causes a loss of efficiency in creating hits. Efficiency = 1.0 - B* N/S where N = threshold cut in terms of width of the pedestal = 4 S= Signal to noise ratio=10 B= backscattering probability=0.18.

Test beam results 9 Gev/c p beam 4 cm aerogel Novosibirsk noise/pad < 2% Ring region sect 8 Sector #4 sect 4 Out of ring Sector #8

Novosibirsk 4 cm Photoelectron Yield No Filter 9.7 ± 1.0 11.5 ± 1.2 Filter D263 6.3 ± 0.7 7.4 ± 0.8 Data MC 8 cm 12.2 ± 1.3 14.7 ± 1.6 9.4 ± 1.0 10.1 ± 1.1 results are normalised to 2p acceptance 4 cm (off-ring) 8 cm (off-ring) 1.13±0.21 0.87 ± 0.09 1.38 ± 0.23 1.34 ± 0.15 0.67 ± 0.11 0.55 ± 0.06 1.25 ± 0.21 0.94 ± 0.10 results are in units of 10 ²/cm² Contributions to total error in real data per HPD background subtraction (±1s): 1->8% inefficient or noisy pads : 2->7% Extrapolation to full ring : 5% separation of on-ring/off-ring (±2mm): 5% signal losses outside ADC thresholds (±1s): 2% Contributions to the total error in MC. QE (+- 10%) 10% ref. Index variation (+- 5%) 3% backscattering (+- 2% ) 2% clarity (+- 2%) 2% beam divergence (+-1%) 1%

Cherenkov Angle reconstruction Results per single photoelectron in (mrad): Thickness No filter Filter D263 4 cm 8 cm?c s? 250.0 5.4 248.7 4.0 246.8 5.8 245.0 3.9?c s? 247.1 5.0 246.8 3.1 245.4 4.8 243.7 3.0 Data MC Data MC Aerogel from Novosibirsk Components of s? in mrad for the case with filter. Pixel size : 1.3 Beam divergence: 0.7 Chromatic: 2.5 Emission Pt: 1.1 Alignment: 2->4 (not included in s? MC )

HCAL Test beam HCAL is a sampling device made out of steel as absorber and scintillating tiles are active material. The scintillating tiles run parallel to the beam axis. It will provide data for the LHCb hadron trigger. Using testbeams, the response to particles incident at various angles is studied and is being compared those from simulation.

Response to 50 GeV/c Pions Histogram : Real Data Dots: Simulation Energy Response in HCAL Testbeam Data, GEANT3 (MICAP +FLUKA). HCAL TDR. Testbeam Data, GEANT4. I.Belyaev+A.Berdiouguine et. al

Data and G3 Energy Resolution of HCAL Testbeam Data, GEANT3 GEANT3 with GEISHA, FLUKA,MICAP Testbeam Data, GEANT4 G4+GEISHA agrees with G3+GEISHA. Need help to understand and use G4 with QGS+CHIPS Data and G4 Data G4 (QGS+CHIPS) G4(GEISHA) I.Belyaev + A. Berdiouguine et. al

Status of the GAUSS Project Current MC productions in LHCb use GEANT3. GAUSS: To simulate LHCb using GEANT4. GIGA interface: to use GEANT4 with the GAUDI Framework. Ref: Presentation by W. Pokorski on Wednesday. Geometry Input: XML database. A version available for all the detectors in LHCb. Input events: From Pythia or other similar programs through the HEPMC interface into GEANT4. A first version of the whole Simulation chain is now working. Starting to study the response of the detectors in detail.

RICH1 with a Particle Gun RICH1 Event Display XML G4 OpenGL Pion with 7 GeV/c. Cherenkov Photons In Aerogel and C 4 F 10. Rayleigh scattering Switched off for Illustration.

Summary RICH testbeam simulation is performed using GEANT4. Results of this simulation is compared with Real Data. HCAL test beam data comparison with GEANT4 in progress. A Project to perform the LHCb simulation using GEANT4 has started. We are expecting lot of interactions between the GEANT4 collaboration and LHCb in the coming years.