Chattanooga Scale Modelers Judging System (rev )

Similar documents
Photo-realism Fundamentals

Bellevue Community College Summer 2009 Interior Design 194 SPECIAL TOPIC: SKETCHUP

Cursor Design Considerations For the Pointer-based Television

Please take the time to read through our helpful guide on preparing print ready files to ensure there are no delays in processing your order.

1. New document, set to 5in x 5in, no bleed. Color Mode should be default at CMYK. If it s not, changed that when the new document opens.

UV Mapping to avoid texture flaws and enable proper shading

SkillsUSA Business and Industry Video Production

Animator Friendly Rigging Part 1

Webb Core Cleanroom Wall System

Problem and Solution Overview: An elegant task management solution, that saves busy people time.

Copyright 2017 by Kevin de Wit

There we are; that's got the 3D screen and mouse sorted out.

Part II: Creating Visio Drawings

Publications Database

Worksheet Answer Key: Scanning and Mapping Projects > Mine Mapping > Investigation 2

1. Mesh Coloring a.) Assign unique color to each polygon based on the polygon id.

dual bipolar voltage controlled step sequencer DIY ASSEMBLY MANUAL v1.03

Chapter01.fm Page 1 Monday, August 23, :52 PM. Part I of Change. The Mechanics. of Change

POSTER PROBLEMS LAUNCH POSE A PROBLEM WORKSHOP POST, SHARE, COMMENT STRATEGIC TEACHER-LED DISCUSSION FOCUS PROBLEM: SAME CONCEPT IN A NEW CONTEXT

PRELIMINARY APPLICATION SPECIFICATION

Character Modeling IAT 343 Lab 6. Lanz Singbeil

We asked the following questions about having fun at TESOL (24 point, Arial)

st ANNUAL SKILLS MANITOBA COMPETITION CONTEST DESCRIPTION

into the EMU E4 Classic and E4 Platinum Samplers

Getting Started with Silo

Tutorial: How to make low poly car. By Jirayu Tanabodee

NIFA Scoring System User s Manual

1 of 8 11/25/ :42 PM

Who has worked on a voxel engine before? Who wants to? My goal is to give the talk I wish I would have had before I started on our procedural engine.

STONELAW HIGH GRAPHIC

Solarwinds Virtualization Manager 6.0 Review

Industrial Marking and Labeling, Inc. with all fonts converted to outlines or

Perfect Timing. Alejandra Pardo : Manager Andrew Emrazian : Testing Brant Nielsen : Design Eric Budd : Documentation

Visual Perception. Visual contrast

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Consistency. Consistency

CPSC 217 Assignment 3

Grade 7/8 Math Circles November 3/4, M.C. Escher and Tessellations

Introduction to Programming

Blackout Shutter Kits with Breathable Wall Light Traps

National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Norman, OK Website Redesign Proposal Report 12/14/2015

Congratulations on selecting your new Carson binoculars!

Strong signs your website needs a professional redesign

User-Centered Design Data Entry

Tips for modeling in Sketchup

Scenarios, Storyboards, Wireframes, Critique. Jon Kolko Professor, Austin Center for Design

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

st ANNUAL SKILLS MANITOBA COMPETITION CONTEST DESCRIPTION

Richard Williams Study Circle Handout: Disney 12 Principles of Animation. Frank Thomas & Ollie Johnston: The Illusion of Life

SketchUp Tool Basics

MAKING OF BY BRUNO HAMZAGIC SOFTWARE USED: MAYA AND ZBRUSH

2010 Camaro Body Tutorial

textures not patterns

Introduction to Programming Style

Shree.Datta Polytechnic College,Dattanagar, Shirol. Class Test- I

ipod Classic Click Wheel Replacement Written By: irobot ifixit CC BY-NC-SA Page 1 of 25

In Wings 3D: Basic Pants

AREA Judo Math Inc.

Lesson 11. Polygonal Spaceship

How to use Purple Pen

Overview. Animation is a big topic We will concentrate on character animation as is used in many games today. humans, animals, monsters, robots, etc.

Blackout Shutter Kits with Breathable Wall Light Traps

Editor Guide Version 1.0 Beta

BRGS KS3 Design and Technology Assessment Criteria. Year 7

Here s the general problem we want to solve efficiently: Given a light and a set of pixels in view space, resolve occlusion between each pixel and

Devel::Cover - An Introduction

Analyzing Systems. Steven M. Bellovin November 26,

Wayne Mahan, GTAC. Converting a Solid Body to Sheet Metal

Rock Tutorial: Creating A Rock Like Seen In Gears Of War With A Focus On Normal

Snow Shader R&D in UDK I3 DLC

Customize Your Environment

Visible Authority (860)

The Surface Plane. Sensory Design

Project 1 Balanced binary

Presented by Dr. Mariah Judd February 15, 2013

Before you begin, make sure you have the images for these exercises saved in the location where you intend to create the Nuklear Family Website.

1.7 Limit of a Function

The printer performs a power-on sequence, and then the Configuration menu appears.

Homework # 4. Example: Age in years. Answer: Discrete, quantitative, ratio. a) Year that an event happened, e.g., 1917, 1950, 2000.

aerofly FS 2: Rodeo s Tutorial Repaints and Previews Addendum

ipod Classic Headphone Jack & Hold Switch Replacement

> creative résumé. > specifications: save as: Resume_Lastname.ai dimensions: 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 8.5" mode: CMYK

Topics in Software Testing

Key 3D Modeling Terms Beginners Need To Master

CSC 258 lab notes, Fall 2003

Level 2 Advanced NURBS modelling with Rhino

Tangents. In this tutorial we are going to take a look at how tangents can affect an animation.

Computer Animation INF2050

Quarter Course (Nine Week) Advanced Photoshop Brief Description Project One Logo Design. Evaluation Criteria. III.Perform/Present

10 Hidden IT Risks That Might Threaten Your Business

Scene Management. Video Game Technologies 11498: MSc in Computer Science and Engineering 11156: MSc in Game Design and Development

Samsung Galaxy S8 Screen Replacement

Creating Digital Illustrations for Your Research Workshop III Basic Illustration Demo

CSCI 1100L: Topics in Computing Lab Lab 1: Introduction to the Lab! Part I

Remark Office OMR. Tutorials

SECTION [13200] FRAMED 2000 CLEANROOM WALL SYSTEM

SNOWFLAKES PHOTO BORDER - PHOTOSHOP CS6 / CC

Pro-Flo System Digital Controller EPROM Upgrade

EEN118 LAB TWO. 1. A Five-Pointed Star.

HOW TO CONVERT VISITORS TO CLIENTS

SCRATCH MODULE 3: NUMBER CONVERSIONS

Transcription:

Chattanooga Scale Modelers Judging System (rev 11-22-14) Judging Gold, Silver and Bronze First, one must realize that just as all the possible permutations and rankings of flaws are impossible to define for IPMS Judging, it s similarly impossible to do for GSB judging. All we can do is set out guidelines. From those guidelines the judges will be expected to fairly use their judgment, common sense, and experience when applying the guidelines to a model. While we aren t trying to narrow a field down to the top three entries, judges will still be looking for the same types of flaws, as well as the good work done in trying to determine whether to award Gold, Silver or Bronze. We d suggest that like IPMS Judging, judges make a first cut. That is, to view the models from a casual viewing distance (2-3 feet) to see if anything is apparently wrong. Can you, standing over the model, see visible seams? Glue blobs? Heavy orange peel? Clear parts fogged? Alignment issue? If so, the model hasn t made the first cut and in a typical 1-2-3 contest, it wouldn t likely be looked at further as there are likely to be at least 3 models of higher quality. Likewise, it hasn t made the cut for a bronze medal. This is not to say that after that first cut, closer inspection of a model that made the cut doesn t reveal a flaw or flaws that when taken alone or together could or should take the model out of contention for an award. As a final note, the following guidelines were written from an aircraft modeler s point of view. The concepts however should carry over equitably to other genres. Regardless of genre or class, a model s parts must be removed from sprues, cleaned up, assembled cleanly with seams filled and detail restored, painted and decaled well, and weathered appropriately and consistently. We trust that judges in other genres can take the examples outlined below and translate them into terms that fit their particular genre. BRONZE LEVEL A Bronze Medal reflects the modeler s avoidance of any significant errors on the model. The model has no glaring flaws in finish or construction as seen from a casual viewing distance. At closer range a number of minor flaws may be noticeable but are not concentrated in one area or indicate a lack of basic skills (for example, one decal, but not all, may be silvered). This level of quality indicates the modeler is doing the right things but needs to be more consistent in execution. Basic craftsmanship is good, but realism or attention to details may be lacking. Examples of flaws that would not drop a model from contention for a bronze might be: Slight misalignment of the landing gear and or gear doors Wings slightly out of level Slight misalignment of the tail Note though that multiple misalignments should preclude a bronze score for construction as it should be clear that proper care wasn t taken during construction. Slight orange peel in the paint finish Occasional decal silvering Inconsistent detail repair (scribing, rivets, contours) following seam treatments

In general, the model will demonstrate that the modeler has a solid grasp of the basics. Seams are taken care of, the model is pretty well aligned, paint work is good but not perfect, decals are good but not perfect, and weathering (if present) may be less than well rendered. This model may, or may not have contended for a third place in a contest, but still demonstrates that the modeler understands and can execute the basics. SILVER LEVEL A Silver Medal reflects a modeler exhibiting very few minor errors in construction, and a better grasp of finishing techniques. This applies to out of the box kits as well as a high level of accomplishment with adding details not included with the kit. The model has a higher level of craftsmanship in all areas: very few flaws, finishes are realistic, basic techniques have been used to improve appearance (exposed edges are realistically thinned, gun barrels or exhaust stacks are drilled out, etc). Misalignments should not be apparent to the naked eye (if a measuring aid is required to demonstrate or prove misalignment, that element is done well enough to qualify for Silver) Paint finish should be uniform with only very minor irregularities around typical trouble spots such as wing roots or raised detail Decals should be nearly perfect, with virtually no silvering and they should conform uniformly to both raised and recessed detail Detail repairs such as re-scribing following major construction should be consistent and similar to kit detail Weathering, if present, should be consistent and in scale Detailing should be consistent. If the cockpit is detailed, other areas such as wheel wells should be detailed Gun barrels should be drilled out Aftermarket detailing should be cleanly incorporated and in scale A silver medal model is one that most likely would have been a contender for a placing in a crowded, high quality category in a typical contest. It demonstrates that not only has the modeler mastered the basics, but he has command of more advanced techniques as well. GOLD LEVEL A Gold Medal represents an exceptional level of craftsmanship - practically no flaws or omissions of basic techniques should be present, and the finish should be near to perfect. Current best practices for assembly and finish are used throughout and are executed well. An out-of-the-box model can receive a Gold award, but it must exhibit the highest standards. Gold recognizes that the modeler has made a model with almost zero-defects. Misalignments should be nearly impossible to measure Paint finish should be uniform and realistic Decals should appear painted on with clear film not apparent. No silvering should be present, and weathering should be applied to give markings the same worn appearance as the rest of the model

Detail repairs following major construction should be imperceptible Weathering should appear completely natural, in scale and be consistent Aftermarket or scratch built detailing must be cleanly incorporated and in scale A gold medal model is close to perfect. A small error should not eliminate a model from a gold medal, but two might. In many cases a Gold medal model will demand your attention and draw you to it; and it may be equal parts artistry and technical achievement. Scoring We have broken scoring into three areas, construction, finish and intangibles. Please note the tables to follow are not hard, fast RULES. They are meant as guidelines to aid the judges in applying their judgment and common sense. Using alignment as an example, our intent is that a slightly skewed wheel will not knock an otherwise magnificent model out of a Gold award. We also wouldn t want an out of alignment tail plane to knock a model out of Bronze. But what about a tail plane, a wing and a gear leg? That probably indicates a modeler who either hasn t mastered or doesn t fully understand the basics, and the model should be removed from consideration for a medal. Also, constructive feedback is a very important part of what we are trying to achieve. Please take a few moments while judging each model to indicate where a modeler might improve his efforts. We will be making the scoring sheets available to the modelers, so while the comments need to be honest, they also need to be constructive and fair. Construction: 1-5 points This is where both basic and advanced construction techniques are evaluated. 1 pt If the model made it to the table and is assembled, it gets 1 pt. 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts Seams, glue marks, alignments issues visible from a viewing distance of 2-3 ft (casual viewing distance Faint seams, rare glue spot, slight alignment issue visible on close inspection. Lost detail either not restored, or not well restored. Ejector pins/punch out marks may be present on close inspection Seams, glue, only visible with aid of penlight. Alignment issue must be measured to verify. Lost detail must be restored, but may not be perfect. No ejector pins or the like visible. Level of detailing should be consistent through the model (i.e. wheel wells and cockpit). 5 pts Near perfect build.

Finish: 1-5 points This is where paint, decals, and weathering would be considered. 1 pt Like construction, if the model has paint/decals/stickers on it, it gets 1 pt. 2 pts Issues with paint, decals, weathering are visible from a casual viewing distance of 2-3 feet. 3 pts Issues become visible on close inspection. Gloss finish may be slightly orange peeled. Rough texture may be present in trouble spots like wing roots. Camo transitions may be inconsistent, or may show build up on masking edges. Occasional decal silvering may be present or decals may not have settled into detail. Weathering, if attempted may not be consistent. 4 pts Paint should be a consistent finish, with trouble spots only visible with a pen light. Camo transitions should be consistent, with no paint build up at masked edges. Gloss finishes should be smooth. Decal silvering should only be apparent with a pen light. Decals should conform well to all surface detail. Weathering should be consistent and realistic. 5 pts Near perfect finish. Scope/difficulty/presentation: 1 point available for intangibles This is perhaps both the most difficult and easiest point to explain. This is where we trust the judgment of the judges the most. The judges can award a point and reward extra effort for tackling what they know to be a difficult kit, or for adding a significant amount of extra detail, or for making significant corrections to an inaccurate kit. It is also be where they can add a point for presentation (i.e. a very nicely weathered AFV on a realistic base), or where they can reward an effort they think exhibits something special. As noted, this is a point that MAY be added for an intangible that the judge feels is worthy of note. If a judge doesn t see anything in a model that he, as a modeler and a judge feels warrants the extra point, it simply isn t awarded.

Scoring Breakdown Scoring Item Points Available (decimals encouraged) Award Levels Construction 1-5 Gold = 9.8 to 11 pts Finish 1-5 Silver = 7.89 to 9.79 pts Intangible 0-1 Bronze = 6.00 to 7.88 pts Total Available 11 Under 6 pts = no award Using this scoring, a very clean Out of Box build with a very clean but basic finish will be able to score 5 points for both construction and finish, thus securing Gold. A modeler who brings something else, an intangible, to his build may score 11 points. A model MAY be lifted one level with the intangible point if the judges feel it is applicable. It is our hope that by including the intangible point we can encourage modelers to be more adventurous, try new things, and strive for a more artistic or realistic presentation of their models. Best of s Best of s will be selected by the judges from those models scoring 11-12 points. In a class where no model has scored 11 points, the best of will be selected from those scoring 10 points.

This is an example of the scoring sheet to be used: Chattanooga Scale Modelers Score Sheet Table Letter Reg # Model # Entry Name Const 1-5 pts Finish 1-5 pts Intangible +1 or 0 Total Pts Other Comments: Modeler's Name Comments Note: The score sheets will be made available to the modelers after the show so they may see how their models were scored and read any additional comments left by the judges. It is our hope that the judges will leave useful, constructive feedback to help the modeler improve his or her work in the future. However, all must understand that because both the number of judges, and the time allowed for judging is limited, the feedback will by necessity be brief. Commentary on positive aspects of a model is also encouraged! Judge: www.chattanoogascalemodelers.com