Chapter 3 Set Redundancy in Magnetic Resonance Brain Images

Similar documents
RADIOMICS: potential role in the clinics and challenges

A Model-Independent, Multi-Image Approach to MR Inhomogeneity Correction

White Pixel Artifact. Caused by a noise spike during acquisition Spike in K-space <--> sinusoid in image space

DENOISING OF COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES USING CURVELET TRANSFORM

surface Image reconstruction: 2D Fourier Transform

ANALYSIS OF PULMONARY FIBROSIS IN MRI, USING AN ELASTIC REGISTRATION TECHNIQUE IN A MODEL OF FIBROSIS: Scleroderma

Supplementary Information

Slide 1. Technical Aspects of Quality Control in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Slide 2. Annual Compliance Testing. of MRI Systems.

HST.583 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis Fall 2008

Compressed Sensing Reconstructions for Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI

CHAPTER 2 TEXTURE CLASSIFICATION METHODS GRAY LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIX AND TEXTURE UNIT

Correction of Partial Volume Effects in Arterial Spin Labeling MRI

New Technology Allows Multiple Image Contrasts in a Single Scan

Interpolation of 3D magnetic resonance data

MR IMAGE SEGMENTATION

CHAPTER 3 WAVELET DECOMPOSITION USING HAAR WAVELET

Computational Medical Imaging Analysis

ISSN: X Impact factor: 4.295

Whole Body MRI Intensity Standardization

Optimizing Flip Angle Selection in Breast MRI for Accurate Extraction and Visualization of T1 Tissue Relaxation Time

A novel noise removal using homomorphic normalization for multi-echo knee MRI

Performance Evaluation of the TINA Medical Image Segmentation Algorithm on Brainweb Simulated Images

Volume 2, Issue 9, September 2014 ISSN

1 Introduction Motivation and Aims Functional Imaging Computational Neuroanatomy... 12

A COMPARISON OF WAVELET-BASED AND RIDGELET- BASED TEXTURE CLASSIFICATION OF TISSUES IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

CP Generalize Concepts in Abstract Multi-dimensional Image Model Component Semantics. David Clunie.

Image Compression Using Modified Fast Haar Wavelet Transform

CHAPTER 6. 6 Huffman Coding Based Image Compression Using Complex Wavelet Transform. 6.3 Wavelet Transform based compression technique 106

Medical Images Analysis and Processing

Sparse sampling in MRI: From basic theory to clinical application. R. Marc Lebel, PhD Department of Electrical Engineering Department of Radiology

INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS APPLIED TO fmri DATA: A GENERATIVE MODEL FOR VALIDATING RESULTS

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS

Digital Image Processing

Quantitative MRI of the Brain: Investigation of Cerebral Gray and White Matter Diseases

Medical Image Fusion using Rayleigh Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization and Ant Colony Edge Method

Extraction and Features of Tumour from MR brain images

Exam 8N080 - Introduction MRI

Segmentation and Modeling of the Spinal Cord for Reality-based Surgical Simulator

MR Advance Techniques. Vascular Imaging. Class III

IDENTIFYING different materials within sampled datasets

TUMOR DETECTION IN MRI IMAGES

2.1 Signal Production. RF_Coil. Scanner. Phantom. Image. Image Production

COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY CONTROL OF NMR TOMOGRAPHY USING 3D PRINTED PHANTOM

MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING (CAP 5937) LECTURE 4: Pre-Processing Medical Images (II)

A Novel Iterative Thresholding Algorithm for Compressed Sensing Reconstruction of Quantitative MRI Parameters from Insufficient Data

7.1 INTRODUCTION Wavelet Transform is a popular multiresolution analysis tool in image processing and

The Anatomical Equivalence Class Formulation and its Application to Shape-based Computational Neuroanatomy

Learning to Identify Fuzzy Regions in Magnetic Resonance Images

Constructing System Matrices for SPECT Simulations and Reconstructions

This exercise uses one anatomical data set (ANAT1) and two functional data sets (FUNC1 and FUNC2).

Image Acquisition Systems

Image Processing Techniques for Brain Tumor Extraction from MRI Images using SVM Classifier

Separate CT-Reconstruction for Orientation and Position Adaptive Wavelet Denoising

Medical Image Compression using DCT and DWT Techniques

Basic principles of MR image analysis. Basic principles of MR image analysis. Basic principles of MR image analysis

MRI Physics II: Gradients, Imaging

Analysis of Functional MRI Timeseries Data Using Signal Processing Techniques

FUSION OF TWO IMAGES BASED ON WAVELET TRANSFORM

HST.583 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis Fall 2006

The University of Chicago. Center for EPR Imaging in Vivo Physiology. Image Registration. Boris Epel

Field Maps. 1 Field Map Acquisition. John Pauly. October 5, 2005

Role of Parallel Imaging in High Field Functional MRI

Locating Motion Artifacts in Parametric fmri Analysis

CHAPTER 9: Magnetic Susceptibility Effects in High Field MRI

Image Registration. Prof. Dr. Lucas Ferrari de Oliveira UFPR Informatics Department

A Study of Medical Image Analysis System

CHAPTER 6 DETECTION OF MASS USING NOVEL SEGMENTATION, GLCM AND NEURAL NETWORKS

Abbie M. Diak, PhD Loyola University Medical Center Dept. of Radiation Oncology

Intensity Transformations. Digital Image Processing. What Is Image Enhancement? Contents. Image Enhancement Examples. Intensity Transformations

Digital Volume Correlation for Materials Characterization

Norbert Schuff VA Medical Center and UCSF

CHAPTER 3 TUMOR DETECTION BASED ON NEURO-FUZZY TECHNIQUE

Dosimetric Analysis Report

6 credits. BMSC-GA Practical Magnetic Resonance Imaging II

Statistical Analysis of MRI Data

TERM PAPER ON The Compressive Sensing Based on Biorthogonal Wavelet Basis

Denoising the Spectral Information of Non Stationary Image using DWT

Wavelet-based Texture Classification of Tissues in Computed Tomography

Classification of Subject Motion for Improved Reconstruction of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Skull Segmentation of MR images based on texture features for attenuation correction in PET/MR

Introduction to Medical Image Processing

arxiv: v2 [q-bio.qm] 16 Oct 2017

Review and Implementation of DWT based Scalable Video Coding with Scalable Motion Coding.

Supplementary Figure 1

Automated Brain Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using Magnetic Resonance Images

IMAGE DIGITIZATION BY WAVELET COEFFICIENT WITH HISTOGRAM SHAPING AND SPECIFICATION

Biometric Security System Using Palm print

Image Denoising Based on Hybrid Fourier and Neighborhood Wavelet Coefficients Jun Cheng, Songli Lei

Diffusion model fitting and tractography: A primer

Medical Imaging Projects

NON-LINEAR MEDIAN FILTERING OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGES

Optimal Sampling Geometries for TV-Norm Reconstruction of fmri Data

PET AND MRI BRAIN IMAGE FUSION USING REDUNDANT WAVELET TRANSFORM

An Introduction To Automatic Tissue Classification Of Brain MRI. Colm Elliott Mar 2014

Introduction to fmri. Pre-processing

Ch. 4 Physical Principles of CT

IMAGE COMPRESSION. Chapter - 5 : (Basic)

M R I Physics Course

Lucy Phantom MR Grid Evaluation

Supplementary methods

Transcription:

16 Chapter 3 Set Redundancy in Magnetic Resonance Brain Images 3.1 MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI is a technique of measuring physical structure within the human anatomy. Our proposed research focuses on brain structures but will include other image types to demonstrate our techniques. MRI systems produce brain images in cross-sections of a human head. These brain images are acquired by measuring the interaction between pulses of RF (radio frequency) radiation and tissues in a strong magnetic field. Then they are transformed to reconstruct a "3-dimensional" digital image volume. Figure 3.1 depicts the 2 slices comprising an example MR volume with 256*256 pixels in each single slice. Figure 3.1 2 slices of MR brain images comprising an example volume

17 In MRI, several tissue characteristics including the PD (proton density), the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and the transversal relaxation time (T2) can be measured. The intensity of each voxel of an MR volume image is related to the PD, T1, and T2 of the tissues located at the corresponding anatomical position. The contrast between different tissue types can be controlled at the time of acquisition by varying several MRI parameters including the pulse repetition time (T R ) and echo time (T E ). Choice of these parameters can result in PD-weighted, T1-weighted, or 59, 6 T2-weighted images. As a result, MRI data is inherently multi-spectral. In this proposed research, we use all three image types, that is, PD-weighted, T1- weighted, or T2-weighted images, as the basic test sets for proposed compression method. 3.2 Special Redundancy in a 3-D MR Brain Image Set MRI data contain large quantities of noise, which are uncorrelated from slice to slice. This makes the structure of the cross dependence more complicated than temporal sequences. Yet, a significant amount of redundancy between successive slices of MR data can be found after a close investigation of the structure of MR brain images (Figure 3.1). For instance, they are similar in terms of the shape, pixel intensity at certain anatomical position, and analogous anatomical structures from subjective observation. In addition, statistical analysis was also done to further illustrate the similarity of these images. 3.2.1 Histogram Analysis Histograms for several nonconsecutive MR brain images on Figure 3.1 are presented on Figure 3.2. This shows that more than 5 percent of the pixels have zero intensity, which corresponds to 1 percent black, and all the other intensities are uniformly distributed with a possibility of less than 1 percent.

18.7 Histogram of T2-Weighted Image #1.7 Histogram of T2-Weighted Image #6.6.6.5.5..3..3.2.2.1.1-5 5 1 15 2 25 3-5 5 1 15 2 25 3 (a) Image #1 (b) Image #6.7 Histogram of T2-Weighted Image #11.7 Histogram of T2-Weighted Image #16.6.6.5.5..3..3.2.2.1.1-5 5 1 15 2 25 3-5 5 1 15 2 25 3 (c) Image #11 (d) Image #16 Figure 3.2 Comparable histograms of four nonconsecutive MR brain images (Figure 3.1). 3.2.2 Plot of Wavelet Coefficients A two-level wavelet transform was applied to the same four nonconsecutive MR brain images presented on Figure 3.2. The plots of the coefficients of all decomposed sub-images for all four images are depicted on Figure 3.3.,, V2, D2, H1, V1 and D1 represent level 2 and level 1 decompositions of wavelet transform in average, horizontal, vertical and diagonal directions respectively. The abscissa represents the vector position and the ordinate represents the value of the decomposed coefficients in their corresponding vector position. All four images have very similar (not

19 identical) plots for level 2 average decomposition, which is the coarse approximation of the original image at a high scale, as shown on each subplot. Deviations from the average approximation of horizontal, vertical and diagonal directions are also similar to each other. 2 5 2 5-2 2 V2 6 5-5 2 D2 6 2-2 2 V2 6 5-5 2 D2 6 2-5 2 H1 6 2-2 2 V1 6 2-5 2 H1 6 2-2 2 V1 6 2-2.5 D1 1 1.5 2 5 x 1-2.5 1 1.5 2 x 1-2.5 D1 1 1.5 2 5 x 1-2.5 1 1.5 2 x 1-5.5 1 1.5 2 x 1-5.5 1 1.5 2 x 1 (a) Image #1 (b) Image #6 2 5 2 5-2 2 V2 6 5-5 2 D2 6 2-2 2 V2 6 5-5 2 D2 6 2-5 2 H1 6 2-2 2 V1 6 2-5 2 H1 6 1-2 2 V1 6 1-2.5 D1 1 1.5 2 5 x 1-2.5 1 1.5 2 x 1-1.5 D1 1 1.5 2 5 x 1-1.5 1 1.5 2 x 1-5.5 1 1.5 2 x 1-5.5 1 1.5 2 x 1 (c) Image #11...(d) Image #16 Figure 3.3 Coefficients of decomposed sub-images for a 2-level wavelet transform 3.2.3 Feature Vector Table 3.1 numerically lists the mean and variance for all decomposed sub-images presented on Figure 3.3. The corresponding vectors (MA 2, VA 2, MH 2, VH 2, MV 2, VV 2, MD 2, VD 2, MH 1, VH 1, MV 1, VV 1, MD 1, VD 1 ) derived from the first row of Table 3.1 are defined as feature vectors in our research since both mean and variance are good statistical tools to represent the general characteristics of this population. Here, MA 2,

2 MH 2, MV 2, MD 2, MH 1, MV 1 and MD 1 represent a mean of level 2 and level 1 decompositions of wavelet transform in average, horizontal, vertical and diagonal direction respectively, whereas VA 2, VH 2, VV 2, VD 2, VH 1, VV 1 and VD 1 represent the corresponding variances. There are only slight deviations for feature vectors of four MR brain images. MA 2 VA 2 MH 2 VH 2 MV 2 VV 2 MD 2 VD 2 MH 1 VH 1 MV 1 VV 1 MD 1 VD 1 #1 229.51 277.52.9 1.93 -.37 38.5.2 2.3 -.6 12.89 -. 9.78.3 2.87 #6 256.9 313.32.3 6.7.26.61 -.11 19.69.5 12.78.2 1.9 -.3 3. #11 255.57 32.37.11 7.8 -.13 37.13 -.5 21.3-13.9 -.3 11.28 -.8 3.38.3 #16 2.11 296..3 38.9.8 37.5 -.5 17.73 -.1 1.52.3 9.79.6 2.78 3.2. Entropy Table 3.1 Feature vector for four nonconsecutive MR brain images The entropy for original four nonconsecutive MR brain images and their corresponding wavelet transform images are shown in Table 3.2. The entropy of an image is a measure of the amount of information an image contains, and it is also used as a measure for the compressibility of the image (lower entropy means better compressibility). The comparable entropy values for all four original MR brain images illustrate that each contains almost an equal amount of information. This holds true for the wavelet transform entropy. Image Original Entropy WT Entropy Image #1.551 3.921 Image #6.568 3.8518 Image #11.3363 3.696 Image #16 3.5683 3.111 3.2.5 Correlation Table 3.2: Original entropy and wavelet transform entropy for four nonconsecutive MR brain images in testing image sets Finally, the correlation was determined (Table 3.3) between these same four nonconsecutive MR brain images. The existence of statistical correlation between two images can be verified graphically with a scatter plot of pixel values, and numerically by calculating the correlation coefficient. It was observed in the four

21 nonconsecutive MR brain images, which should have less similarity than consecutive images, that the correlation was between.6 and.7. This signifies similarities among all four images and even more similarity with neighboring MR brain images. 3.3 Summary Correlation Image #1 Image #6 Image #11 Image #16 Image #1 1.7311.7663.6272 Image #6.7311 1.7953.638 Image #11.7663.7953 1.7213 Image #16.6272.638.7213 1 Table 3.3 Correlation between all four nonconsecutive MR brain images Based on these statistical analyses, we can conclude that the redundancies in a 3-D MR brain image set can be summarized as follows: Similar pixel intensities in the same areas, Similar edge distributions, Analogous distributions of features, Comparable histograms (Figure 3.2), Identical sub-image coefficients of each decomposition direction and comparable feature vectors after applying transforms such as wavelet transform. (Figure 3.3 and Table 3.1), Comparable entropy for both original images and wavelet transformed images respectively (Table 3.2), High correlation (Table 3.3). The special redundancies in a 3-D MR brain image set may be expanded to any other 3-D medical image set. We will choose a 3-D knee medical image set to further demonstrate the prevalence of these redundancies.

22 It has been proven 61 that entropy of the image set will decrease when the redundancies of the same image set increases. Therefore, we will utilize the set redundancy in a 3-D medical image set to further the compression.