SAR Speckle Filtering

Similar documents
In addition, the image registration and geocoding functionality is also available as a separate GEO package.

RESTORATION OF TEXTURAL PROPERTIES IN SAR IMAGES USING SECOND ORDER STATISTICS

URBAN FOOTPRINT MAPPING WITH SENTINEL-1 DATA

SENTINEL-1 Toolbox. SAR Basics Tutorial Issued March 2015 Updated August Luis Veci

DINSAR: Differential SAR Interferometry

Classification of vegetation types with Sentinel-1 radar data C

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Basic SAR Processing and Analysis

A Fast Speckle Reduction Algorithm based on GPU for Synthetic Aperture Sonar

ENVI Tutorial: Basic SAR Processing and Analysis

GAMMA Interferometric Point Target Analysis Software (IPTA): Users Guide

AN INSITU SINGLE-POINTED WAVELET-BASED METHOD FOR NOISE REDUCTION IN SAR IMAGES

Computer Vision I - Basics of Image Processing Part 1

MULTI-TEMPORAL SAR DATA FILTERING FOR LAND APPLICATIONS. I i is the estimate of the local mean backscattering

IN RECENT years, the frequency of natural disasters has

SAR SURFACE ICE COVER DISCRIMINATION USING DISTRIBUTION MATCHING

Unsupervised Oil Spill Detection in SAR Imagery through an Estimator of Local Regularity

EVALUATION OF CORRELATION CRITERIA FOR SAR IMAGES

ALOS PALSAR. Orthorectification Tutorial Issued March 2015 Updated August Luis Veci

Hydrological network detection for SWOT data. S. Lobry, F. Cao, R. Fjortoft, JM Nicolas, F. Tupin

SAR change detection based on Generalized Gamma distribution. divergence and auto-threshold segmentation

MULTI-TEMPORAL SAR CHANGE DETECTION AND MONITORING

Modified Fuzzy-Anisotropic Gaussian Kernel and CRB in Denoising SAR Image

Interferometric processing. Rüdiger Gens

A WAVELET DOMAIN FILTER FOR CORRELATED SPECKLE

Digital Image Processing

Exact discrete minimization for TV+L0 image decomposition models

Coherence Based Polarimetric SAR Tomography

SARscape. Table of Contents. Preface 1. Overview 3. Basic Module 5. Focusing Module 11. Gamma and Gaussian Filtering Module 11

ECE 176 Digital Image Processing Handout #14 Pamela Cosman 4/29/05 TEXTURE ANALYSIS

C(1) C(i-1) C(i) C(i+1) C(M) Threshold

GMES TERRAFIRMA: VALIDATION OF PSI FOR USERS RESULTS OF THE PROVENCE INTER-COMPARISON

Recognition of Changes in SAR Images Based on Gauss-Log Ratio and MRFFCM

Small-scale objects extraction in digital images

Scene Matching on Imagery

Assessment of Polarimetric and Spatial Features for Built-up Mapping using ALOS PALSAR Polarimetric SAR Data

MULTI-TEMPORAL INTERFEROMETRIC POINT TARGET ANALYSIS

Systholic Boolean Orthonormalizer Network in Wavelet Domain for SAR Image Despeckling

Interferometry Tutorial with RADARSAT-2 Issued March 2014 Last Update November 2017

R i+1 R 2. R i R 1. x 2. x i x i+1

What is an Image? Image Acquisition. Image Processing - Lesson 2. An image is a projection of a 3D scene into a 2D projection plane.

Keywords Change detection, Erosion, Morphological processing, Similarity measure, Spherically invariant random vector (SIRV) distribution models.

Sonar Image Compression

The STUN algorithm for Persistent Scatterer Interferometry

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INSAR PHASE FILTERING APPROCHES IN THE SPATIAL AND THE WAVELET DOMAINS

AN ENHANCED HOMOGENEITY MEASURE BASED SIGNAL VARIANCE ESTIMATION FOR SPECKLE REMOVAL IN ULTRASOUND IMAGES

MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING (CAP 5937) LECTURE 4: Pre-Processing Medical Images (II)

Image Enhancement in Spatial Domain (Chapter 3)

WEIGHTED PYRAMID LINKING FOR SEGMENTATION OF FULLY-POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA

Orthorectifying ALOS PALSAR. Quick Guide

CHAPTER VIII SEGMENTATION USING REGION GROWING AND THRESHOLDING ALGORITHM

PSI Precision, accuracy and validation aspects

URBAN CHANGE DETECTION USING COHERENCE AND INTENSITY CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTI-TEMPORAL ERS-1/2 IMAGERY

WEAKLY SUPERVISED POLARIMETRIC SAR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH MULTI-MODAL MARKOV ASPECT MODEL

An SAR De-noising Algorithm Based on Brainstorming Optimization Strategy in NSCT Domain

2724 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 49, NO. 7, JULY 2011

DENOISING SONAR IMAGES USING A BISHRINK FILTER WITH REDUCED SENSITIVITY

Sentinel-1 processing with GAMMA software

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. Interferometry Tutorial Issued March 2015 Updated August Luis Veci

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

A comparative analysis of ALOS PALSAR L-band and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region

Detecting Salient Contours Using Orientation Energy Distribution. Part I: Thresholding Based on. Response Distribution

TEXTURE. Plan for today. Segmentation problems. What is segmentation? INF 4300 Digital Image Analysis. Why texture, and what is it?

IASI spectral calibration monitoring on MetOp-A and MetOp-B

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ADAPTIVE SPECKLE FILTERS FOR ULTRASOUND IMAGES

Speckle Suppression of Radar Images Using Normalized Convolution

Unsupervised Segmentation of Synthetic Aperture Radar Sea Ice Imagery Using A Novel Markov Random Field Model

FLOOD MONITORING WITH SENTINEL-1 USING S-1 TOOLBOX - JANUARY 2015, MALAWI

CLASSIFICATION AND CHANGE DETECTION

HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR IMAGE BASED ON STATISTICAL REGION MERGING

DEM-BASED SAR PIXEL AREA ESTIMATION FOR ENHANCED GEOCODING REFINEMENT AND RADIOMETRIC NORMALIZATION.

On Speckle Noise Reduction In Medical Ultrasound Images

Full-field optical methods for mechanical engineering: essential concepts to find one way

Evaluation of Inversion of Final Tile Product to Backscatter, AMM1

Photo-realistic Renderings for Machines Seong-heum Kim

Range Imaging Through Triangulation. Range Imaging Through Triangulation. Range Imaging Through Triangulation. Range Imaging Through Triangulation

image filtration i Ole-Johan Skrede INF Digital Image Processing

Spectral Impulse Noise Model for Spectral Image Processing

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. TOPS Interferometry Tutorial Issued May 2014

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT in SPATIAL DOMAIN by Intensity Transformations

LOCAL KERNEL COLOR HISTOGRAMS FOR BACKGROUND SUBTRACTION

SAR Interferometry: a Quick and Dirty Coherence Estimator for Data Browsing

Ice surface velocities using SAR

How to mix spatial and spectral information when processing hyperspectral images

Basic Algorithms for Digital Image Analysis: a course

Compression of RADARSAT Data with Block Adaptive Wavelets Abstract: 1. Introduction

Chapter 3: Intensity Transformations and Spatial Filtering

Forest Retrievals. using SAR Polarimetry. (Practical Session D3P2a)

PolSARpro v4.03 Forest Applications

Learning and Inferring Depth from Monocular Images. Jiyan Pan April 1, 2009

Image Enhancement: To improve the quality of images

Norbert Schuff Professor of Radiology VA Medical Center and UCSF

InSAR Data Coherence Estimation Using 2D Fast Fourier Transform

Keywords Ultrasound image, Speckle noise, despeckling, kidney, filters.

CHAPTER 4 TEXTURE FEATURE EXTRACTION

Evaluation of texture features for image segmentation

A Coarse-to-Fine Approach for Ship Detection in SAR Image Based on CFAR Algorithm

Pixels to Voxels: Modeling Visual Representation in the Human Brain

IMAGE DE-NOISING IN WAVELET DOMAIN

RESOLUTION enhancement is achieved by combining two

BUILT-UP AREAS MAPPING AT GLOBAL SCALE BASED ON ADAPATIVE PARAMETRIC THRESHOLDING OF SENTINEL-1 INTENSITY & COHERENCE TIME SERIES

Transcription:

SAR Speckle Filtering SAR Training for forest monitoring 014/015 Cédric Lardeux Jean-Paul Rudant Pierre-Louis Frison cedric.lardeux@onfinternational.com rudant@univ-mlv.fr frison@univ-mlv.fr SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Coherent magery System Speckle noise Single pixel value no meaning Homogeneous are statistical distribution SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Pixels numbers Reminder: Histogram Standard deviation: s Digital number mean: m SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Pixels numbers Histogram over an homogeneous area deal image With no noise> s 0 mage with little noise > s small mage with high noise > s high Digital number SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

mage histogram over an homogeneous area Amplitude: A p ( / s) A exp A A A s s E A s, EA s ntensity: p ( / s) 1 exp s s 4 E s R, E 8s R p(a) p() A Radar reflectivity: R s E()E(i²+q²)s ² R SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

mage histogram over an homogeneous area Amplitude: A p ( / s) A exp A A A s s E A s, EA s ntensity: p ( / s) 1 exp s s E s, E 8 s 4 p(a) p() R s ² R 1 * R R R 1 R A The higher is R, the more data are spread over SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015 R 1

Pixels number SAR speckle filtering Goal of radar image filtering: Histogram over an homogeneous area Digital Number deal image With no noise> s 0 mage with little noise> s small mage with High noise > s high Decrease the standard deviation s noise) without modify the mean m ( radar refelctivity) SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Speckle: multiplicative noise RADARSAT - Mode Fine 1 Variation coefficient: C A C var() A E( A) var( ) 1 E C x v var( ) E A 4 1 0.57 1 N var() var() x y x y k N N k 1 E( y) E( x) > multilook data C ML C N Look number: N SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

p() L10 multilook data ml 1 L L k k 1 R L3 L1 p( / R) L R 1 L exp L R L1 L R, E R E ml ml C L ml v ml Cv L ml L1 ml SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

MULTLOOK OBTENTON in spatial domain in time domain Sliding window: image * window Date 1 Date Date 3 E() Date 4 9 looks if pixel sare not correlated 4 looks if surface has not changed Example: ERS data - PR products : 3 looks SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

ntensity image (from SLC product) Sète - France: 1.06.001 RADARSAT - FNE 1 NCDENCE 38, 4 x9 m SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Spatial Multilook Processing 3x1 average window 6x average window < 3 Look Due to pixels correlation! < 1 Look Sète - France: 1.06.001 RADARSAT FNE 1 NCDENCE 38, 9 x9 m SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

SPATAL MULTLOOK PROCESSNG Sète - France: 1.06.001 - RADARSAT FNE 1 - NCDENCE 38, 9 x9 m 3x1 average window 6x average window < 3 Look Due to pixels correlation! < 1 Look Photo aérienne (www.géoportail.fr) SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

TEMPORAL MULTLOOK PROCESSNG ERS - PR product SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015 ERS - 3 dates average image

ERS - 3 dates average image SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015 ERS - 3 dates composite image

Goal: estimate R s Most simple: Box Filtering: E() E Advantages: simple + best estimation (MMSE) over homogeneous area nconvenients: Details lost, fuzzy introduction Other classical filters: (median, Sigma, math. morph..): WORST! > Need to introduce specific filters taken into account speckle statistics Neighbourhood size depends on local scene characteristics > Adaptive filters SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Weight coefficient SAR speckle filtering R( d) ( d) m( d) with Frost Filter m Kc d ( d) Kce 1 (MMSE criteria) d: distance to central pixel K1 and K set for the whole image Box filtering c c homogeneous area: heterogeneous area: low high Homogeneous area c, Heterogeneous area Distance to central pixel: d SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Homogeneous area: R. v Speckle Multiplicative Model E(v) 1 > E() R C v 1 L Area with texture: Pixel intensity Scene reflectivity R E(R). t Speckle noise Speckle noise Area with texture > E(R). v. t Texture variations E(t) 1 > E() E(R) v, t stat. independent > C CC t v C t C v SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

C t v CC t C No texture: (Homogeneous area) C C v C v 1 L E() R Number of looks of the image estimated over an homogenous zone of the image E(), c with texture: C C t t C C R R C C v 1C v 1 LC 1L Estimated in the neighbourhood of the considered pixel Estimated over an homogenous zone 1/L Number of looks of the image SAR mage Filtering Goal: Estimation R of R at the central pixel, through E(), C and C v SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

R E a E homogeneous area: t 0 with Kuan and Lee Filters a ct (MMSE criteria) c RE c > heterogeneous area: more weight on central pixel c,e Kuan: Lee: c c c t c c t v c c t c c c v t c c v 1c v v t c c v t Evaluated on homogeneous area Lc 1 L 1 t a c t c c n the local window v L < 3 > Lee < Kuan L 3 > Lee Kuan SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

Maximize Bayesian criteria: Hypothesis on p(r): law MAP (Maximum a posteriori) Filters p ( R/ ) p( / R). p( R) p( ) > R E L1 E L1 4 LE homogeneous area: high > RE K c p(r): law p(/r): law MAP filter Gamma-Gamma filter SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015

CONCLUSON Over homegeneous area: All the filters: ˆ RE Quantitative comparison: (bias, radiometric resolution amelioration) All the filters are equivalent Qualitative comparison: scene dependent SAR for Forest Mapping 014/015