Qalitätssicherung an Multileafkollimatoren. Dr. Lutz Müller Würzburg jan 2004

Similar documents
Advanced Radiotherapy

Raising the Bar in IMRT QA

Quick Reference Datasheet For All RIT113 Packages

Facility Questionnaire PART I (General Information for 3DCRT and IMRT)

IMRT and VMAT Patient Specific QA Using 2D and 3D Detector Arrays

Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., UCSF. Pam Akazawa, CMD, UCSF. Cynthia Chuang, Ph.D., UCSF

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Implementation. Outline. Acknowledgement. History of VMAT. IMAT Basics of IMAT

8/2/2017. PerFRACTION from Sun Nuclear Automated Transit Dosimetry for In-Vivo QA

Dynalog data tool for IMRT plan verification

THE WIRELESS PHANTOM PERFORM ACCURATE PATIENT QA IN LESS TIME THAN EVER!

Disclosure. Outline. Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., Page 1. LINAC and MLC QA for IMRT. Received research support from Siemens Medical Solutions

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH. The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

Machine and Physics Data Guide

FAST, precise. qa software

TPS COMMISSIONING. Laurence Court University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center 4/3/2017 1

IMSURE QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE QA SOFTWARE

Computational modelling and analysis: IOP Medical Physics Group

Preface. Med. Phys. 35(9), , Mechanical QA. Radiation Survey Mechanical tests Light radiation Table, Collimator, Gantry Jaws.

Code of practice: Create a verification plan for OCTAVIUS Detector 729 in Philips Pinnacle³

Investigation of tilted dose kernels for portal dose prediction in a-si electronic portal imagers

3DVH : SUN NUCLEAR On The Accuracy Of The corporation Planned Dose Perturbation Algorithm Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools *Patent Pending

Tomotherapy Physics. Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance. Emilie Soisson, MS

Data. ModuLeaf Mini Multileaf Collimator Precision Beam Shaping for Advanced Radiotherapy

2D DOSE MEASUREMENT USING A FLAT PANEL EPID

VMAT for dummies: Concepts, Clinical Implementation and Treatment Planning. Rajat Kudchadker, Ph.D. Associate Professor

Three-dimensional IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID

4 Measurement. and Analysis. 4.1 Overview and Underlying Principles 4-1

Delta 4 PT. True Volumetric Pre-treatment Verification. The difference is clear

Verification of dynamic and segmental IMRT delivery by dynamic log file analysis

A DOSIMETRIC MODEL FOR SMALL-FIELD ELECTRON RADIATION THERAPY A CREATIVE PROJECT (3 SEMESTER HOURS) SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

Calibration and quality assurance for rounded leaf-end MLC systems

A Geant4 based treatment plan verification tool: commissioning of the LINAC model and DICOM-RT interface

Follow this and additional works at:

Using a research real-time control interface to go beyond dynamic MLC tracking

A comparative analysis for verification of IMRT and VMAT treatment plans using a 2-D and 3-D diode array

Accuracy study. Elekta Synergy S. High precision radiation therapy using Elekta Synergy S. UMC, Utrecht, Netherlands. Institution: Purpose:

Modulation factors calculated with an EPID-derived MLC fluence model to streamline IMRT/VMAT second checks

Evaluation of 3D Gamma index calculation implemented in two commercial dosimetry systems

Comparison of Two Phantoms for End-to-End SRS/SBRT Testing. Vikren Sarkar, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Center

CLINICAL ASPECTS OF COMPACT GANTRY DESIGNS

Real-time monitoring of linac performance using RT plans and logfiles

Version 5.6. Quick Start Guide

Design and performance characteristics of a Cone Beam CT system for Leksell Gamma Knife Icon

NEW METHOD OF COLLECTING OUTPUT FACTORS FOR COMMISSIONING LINEAR ACCELERATORS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS

3DVH FAQs. What is PDP questions

Medical Dosimetry 37 (2012) Medical Dosimetry. journal homepage:

Verification of dose calculations with a clinical treatment planning system based on a point kernel dose engine

ViewRay System Commissioning

A method for deconvolution of integrated electronic portal images to obtain incident fluence for dose reconstruction

UNCOMPROMISING QUALITY

A secondary monitor unit calculation algorithm using superposition of symmetric, open fields for IMRT plans

Accuracy of treatment planning calculations for conformal radiotherapy van 't Veld, Aart Adeodatus

On the clinically relevant detector resolution and error detection capability of COMPASS 3D plan verification

Verification measurements of an emc algorithm using a 2D ion chamber array

Analysis of Radiation Transport through Multileaf Collimators Using BEAMnrc Code

Position accuracy analysis of the stereotactic reference defined by the CBCT on Leksell Gamma Knife Icon

Clinical implementation of photon beam flatness measurements to verify beam quality

Goals. Scope/exclusions. Outline: follow outline of MPPG (plus rationale & some implementation experiences)

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

The IORT Treatment Planning System. radiance. GMV, 2012 Property of GMV All rights reserved

Feasibility of 3D Printed Patient specific Phantoms for IMRT QA and Other Dosimetric Special Procedures

Acceptance Testing and Commissioning of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Systems. Bruce Curran University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, MI

Basic Radiation Oncology Physics

A SYSTEM OF DOSIMETRIC CALCULATIONS

Megan A. Wood, M.S. Under the direction of Larry DeWerd, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin Medical Radiation Research Center (UWMRRC)

TG-148 overview. Introduction. System Overview. System Overview. QA for Helical Tomotherapy: Report of the AAPM Task Group 148. Conflict of Interest:

Comparison of absorbed dose distribution 10 MV photon beam on water phantom using Monte Carlo method and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm

Dose Calculation and Optimization Algorithms: A Clinical Perspective

The MSKCC Approach to IMRT. Outline

Monitor Unit (MU) Calculation

Version 3.7. User Manual

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

Chapter 9 Field Shaping: Scanning Beam

Impact of Multileaf Collimator Configuration Parameters on the Dosimetric Accuracy of 6-Mv Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans

State-of-the-Art IGRT

ICARO Vienna April Implementing 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT in clinical practice: Recommendations of IAEA- TECDOC-1588

New Technology in Radiation Oncology. James E. Gaiser, Ph.D. DABR Physics and Computer Planning Charlotte, NC

Geant4 in Brachytherapy

Photon beam dose distributions in 2D

Use of a commercial ion chamber detector array for the measurement of high spatial resolution photon beam profiles

DAILY LINAC QA BEAM QA

3D SCANNER. 3D Scanning Comes Full Circle. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools

LUP. Lund University Publications. Institutional Repository of Lund University

Table of Contents. About AQUA

Measurement of depth-dose of linear accelerator and simulation by use of Geant4 computer code

An Investigation of a Model of Percentage Depth Dose for Irregularly Shaped Fields

PROVEN TECHNOLOGY IMPROVED

ATTENTION! The whole content of the lecture with all the animations can be dowloaded from:

Development a simple point source model for Elekta SL-25 linear accelerator using MCNP4C Monte Carlo code

Transitioning from pencil beam to Monte Carlo for electron dose calculations

MR-guided radiotherapy: Vision, status and research at the UMC Utrecht. Dipl. Ing. Dr. Markus Glitzner

A method for determining multileaf collimator transmission and scatter for dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy a

MCNP4C3-BASED SIMULATION OF A MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATOR

Dose Distributions. Purpose. Isodose distributions. To familiarize the resident with dose distributions and the factors that affect them

Evaluation of detector array technology for the verification of advanced intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Product Catalogue. Products for Radiotherapy. January 2016

Use of Monte Carlo modelling in radiotherapy linac design. David Roberts, PhD Senior Physicist Elekta

ph fax Deming Way Middleton WI USA

PyCMSXiO: an external interface to script treatment plans for the Elekta CMS XiO treatment planning system

Transcription:

Qalitätssicherung an Multileafkollimatoren Dr. Lutz Müller Würzburg jan 2004

IMRT Verification - present Target Volume Constraints Inverse Planning Algorithm Fluence Map Leaf Sequencer Leaf & Gantry sequence Desired 3-d dose distribution 3-d Dose Delivered 3-d dose distribution 2

Workflow of Film Verification CT scan of phantom Irradiate patient s plan to phantom Apply patient s plan to phantom Calculate dose distribution in Phantom Process film read in 3D data OmniPro - IMRT COMPARE AND EVALUATE DATA: isodoses, + - * /,? Scan Film calibrate register reconstruct 3d 3

Equipment: Body Phantom Film application fields: 1. Universal body 2. Head & Neck 3. Stereotactic Material: water-equivalent RW3 (polystyrene) Dimensions: U: 36 (W) x 18 (H) x 33 (D) H&N: 18 x 18 x 18 cm 4

Royal Marsden (UK) Testing Case: Prostate & Pelvic Nodes in Alderson Phantom DICOM imported plan isodose comparison calibrated film gamma evaluation 5

Routine IMRT Verification - 3D/ 2 ½D Dosimetry checks the quality of treatment planning process and of the delivery process - In routine applications, only the delivery needs to be verified - Check it: measure fluence/sequence offline or online - Trust it: accurate, frequent QA, specially of MLC, is a MUST 6

IMRT Verification 2D Fluence Delivered fluence Leaf Sequence Target Volume Constraints Inverse Planning Algorithm Fluence Map Leaf Sequencer Leaf & Gantry sequence Desired 3-d dose distribution 3-d Dose Delivered 3-d dose distribution 7

Usage of a-si EPID (Elekta i-view) OmniPro-I mrt connects to ELEKTA s database recalibrates images (linear response) 8

Step-and-shoot delivery w/ EPID individual segments (integration w/o deadtime) composed image 9

EPID vs. Film 50% isodoses EPID... Film integrated EPID (normalized) calibrated Film 10

EPID vs. Plan (Helax TMS) integrated EPID (normalized) calculated plan data 11

I mrt QA Device Imaging device Positioning tripod Gantry adapter frame scintillators 12

I mrt QA: Operating Principle Scintillator Incident Radiation Reflected Light 12-bit CCD Camera Mirror 12 Bit parallel Data out 13

Complex IMRT Field BIS Measurement Eclipse Calculation x profile y profile I mrt QA Eclipse 14

MLC QA precise measurement of all leaf positions is needed! 1 cm Gap 0.5mm means 5% error 15

MLC QA with Film Abutting Fields 16

Positioning precision of?-mlc (3D-LINE) Avg. Pos = 24.6 mm Std. Dev. = 0.36 mm 17

Positioning precision of?-mlc (3D-LINE) pos. deviation from average 8 7 6 # of leaves 5 4 3 n = 38 2 1 0 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 discard [cm] 18

Hysteresis in Leaf Positioning 19

Hysteresis in Leaf Positioning Leaf Positioning Hysteresis 16 # of leaves 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 < 0.1 mm 0.1< dx < 0.2 mm >0.2 mm 0 0-0.06-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 avg(close) - avg(open) [cm] 20

MLC QA - Gravity 90 Gantry Orientation vs. 270 Gantry Orientation 21

MLC QA Picket Fence MLC pairs form a narow slot moving across the field, stopping and reaccelerationg at predefined positions 22

MLC QA Leaf Speed Test Leaf pairs form gaps moving with different speed Delivery with beam interrupts 23

MLC QA Picket Fence Regular Pattern Error introduced 1.0 mm 0.9 mm 0.8 mm 0.7 mm 0.6 mm 0.5 mm 0.4 mm 0.3 mm 0.2 mm 0.1 mm 24

MLC QA Picket Fence 1.0 mm 0.9 mm 0.8 mm 0.7 mm 0.6 mm 0.5 mm 0.4 mm 0.3 mm 0.2 mm 0.1 mm 1.0 mm 0.5 mm 25

Leaf Position Readout Precision measured displacement [cm] 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 y = 1.0208x R 2 = 0.9421 0 0.05 0.1 programmed error [cm] 26

Leaf Timing Diagram leaf position (cm) 3.75 3.50 3.25 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 left leaf right leaf left leaf (error) right leaf (error) 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 frame number 27

I mrt - QA Key Features - Fast and simple set-up: less than 5 minutes. - Positioning on table or in gantry accessory holder - Acquisition of individual segments or entire IMRT field - Minimum acquisition time: 120 msec per 2D image - Intensity resolution: 12 bit - Spatial resolution 0.4 x 0.4 mm - Field size up to 400 x 400 mm - Acquisition and analysis integrated in OmniPro-IMRT software platform 29

Verification of intensity modulated pattern calculated plan Individual segments Delivery error! I mrt-qa After error analysis & correction 30

Use of 2-d Dose Distribution for Verification (Measurements at IGR Paris) 1 cm solid water on BIS, Cu plate corresponds to 2 cm H 2 O CadPlan calculates in 3 cm depth 3 cm 5 cm 31

Dynamic Wedge Dynamic Wedge 1.2 Dose/rel. Signal [%] 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0-10 -5 0 5 10 Position [cm] Eclipse BIS 32

Verification of IMRT Quantity 3-D Dose Distribution 2-D Dose/Fluence Leaf Positions MLC QA Calculation Apply Plan to Phantom. Calculate 3-D Dose Distribution Calculate Fluence Pattern or 2-D Dose Distribution Leaf Positions from TPS Measurement Put Films in the Phantom. Process, Scan, Calibrate Films. Compose 3-D Dose Distribution BIS Integrated Fluence Pattern Leaf Positions from single BIS Images MU/Dose Check Penumbra measurement Dose in a reference Point Needed for TPS Set-up Ion Chamber in Phantom Small Ion Chamber or Diode in 3-D-Phantom 33

IMRT dosimetry applications - Verification of the planned versus delivered dose - Verification of the IMRT delivery prior to a treatment - MLC QA - Monitor Unit calculation - Penumbra measurements 34

Startup behaviour Startup Elekta 16MV Startup Behaviour Dose Rate [arb. units] 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Time [ms] 35

Dose Comparison Methods Profiles Isodoses Difference Gamma 36

Gamma evaluation (3mm/3%) 37

BIS2G attached to the gantry The Gantry is turned around 90 degrees. BIS-System already assembled into the adapter. The accelerator is turned around 180 degrees. 38

BIS vs. Cadplan 39

Fluence reconstruction more complex n m?, y? ( x, y) y' ) dx' dy' x? Open field w/o penumbra?? S( x? x', y? y' ) T ( x? x', y? Double-Gaussian Transmission Kernel (from penumbra) L.Ma, P.Geis, A.L.Boyer, Med Phys 24(8), 1997 through MLC 1 or 0 40

I( x 0 Fit of penumbra region Double-Gaussian Kernel:, y 0 ) 2 2 2?? ( x? x0)? ( y? y0)? ( x? x0)? ( y? ( x, y)? exp??? exp 2?? 1? 2?? I0 2 x, y y 0 ) 2??? rel. fluence square field 6cm 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-5.00-4.00-3.00-2.00-1.00 0.00 position [cm] BIS kernel0.6-03/5 Fit to Penumbra region (square field):? 1 =0.6mm? 2 =3 mm????? 41

Double-Gaussian Kernel BIS measured Cadplan / double gaussian kernel 42

Gamma Index Cadplan raw fluence Double Gaussian Kernel?x = 3mm,?D = 3% 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.0 2.25 2.5 43

MLC QA with BIS 2G BIS 2G is an ideal tool for accurate and fast MLC QA: 1. High spatial resolution (0.4x0.4mm), 2. High acquisition speed (120ms/frame) and 3. Gantry mount MLC QA techniques: leaf positioning accuracy and reproducability acceleration and deceleration of leafs gravity effect leaf transmission (leakage) visualization on-line MLC movement 44

IMRT dosimetry applications - Verification of the planned versus delivered dose - Verification of the IMRT delivery prior to a treatment - MLC QA - Monitor Unit calculation - Penumbra measurements 45