CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. T Mobile Czech Republic a.s.

Similar documents
CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Slovak Telekom a.s.

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. T Mobile Polska S. A.

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Cosmote Mobile Telecommunications S.A.

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Hrvatski Telekom d.d.

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Magyar Telekom Nyrt.

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Vodafone Romania

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Telekom Romania

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Vodacom PTY (LTD)

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Vodafone Portugal

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Cosmote Mobile Telecommunications S.A.

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Vodafone Portugal

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany. hereby certifies that. Tele2 Croatia

AUDIT REPORT BENCHMARK IN KAZAKHSTAN

CERTIFICATE. P3 communications GmbH. hereby certifies that. T-Mobile Polska S.A. Marynarska 12, Warszawa

CERTIFICATE VODAFONE CZECH REPUBLIC ACHIEVED BEST IN TEST

VODAFONE GROUP BENCHMARK IN ITALY

CERTIFICATE MAKEDONSKI TELEKOM ACHIEVED BEST IN TEST

CERTIFICATE SLOVAK TELEKOM A.S. ACHIEVED BEST IN TEST

CERTIFICATE TELEKOM ROMANIA

P3 communications GmbH. Has been tasked by. Vodafone Czech Republic a. s. náměstí Junkových Praha 5

CERTIFICATE COSMOTE MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS S.A. ACHIEVED BEST IN TEST

CERTIFICATE CROATIAN TELECOM INC. ACHIEVED BEST IN TEST

CERTIFICATE MAGYAR TELEKOM NYRT. ACHIEVED BEST IN TEST

AUDIT REPORT. P3 communications GmbH Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D Aachen, Germany Has been tasked by

Largest benchmarking test of mobile operators in Switzerland shows Swisscom as the best network in test

RATEL Benchmarking mobile network operators 2017 VESNA KRZMAN

TAKING NETWORK TESTING TO THE NEXT LEVEL

ITU Workshop on Performance, QoS and QoE. Dakar, Senegal, 19-March Erwin Dirckx

The 2018 Mobile Network Test in the Netherlands

Luleå P3 connect. Benchmark. Uddevalla. Göteborg. Halmstad. Helsingborg Malmö

Measurements and QoS Analysis of Live-World Mobile Telecommunication Networks

DRIVE TEST CAMPAIGN RESULTS > Next page

The 2018 Mobile. Network Test

QualiPoc Freerider II

NETWORK TEST. The great 2019 Mobile Network Test THE BENCH 1/2019

The 2017 Mobile Network Test in Spain

ETSI TR V1.1.1 ( ) Technical Report

Regulatory perspective and technical tools and platforms to measure QoS - COUNTRY EXPERIENCES

The 2017 Mobile Network Test in the United Kingdom

Report. Voipfuture Qrystal. VoLTE & VoWifi Demo-Report

QualiPoc Android Probe Non-stop service quality monitoring and optimization

Pilot Walktour (Android) V3.8 Product Overview

Mobile networks service quality measurements in Montenegro

KPI Definition and Computation

Pilot Walktour Pack User Manual V3.6

Summary Report. Prepared for: Refresh Date: 28 Oct :02

Mobile Voice and Data Experience in Estonia

1 Technical methodology

Insights into the QoE of social media applications on smartphones a large-scale real field analysis White paper

The 2018 Mobile Network

Quality of Mobile Services

Cost efficient services testing, monitoring and benchmarking

Quality of Services (QoS) Audit Report-Islamabad

CHAPTER 4. The main aim of this chapter is to discuss the simulation procedure followed in

Chapter 2 of Network Performance and Quality of Service: Determination of Key Performance Indicator (KPI)

ANNEX 1-A: A SUMMARY OF QOS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE VOICE, SMS, MMS & DATA SERVICES at Year 1

A Rational software Whitepaper 05/25/03. IBM Rational Rapid Developer Scalability and Performance Benchmark

Performance monitoring User manual

A1. Technical methodology

VERIZON ACHIEVES BEST IN TEST AND WINS THE P3 MOBILE BENCHMARK USA

SE Memory Consumption

INTERNATIONAL INTERCONNECTION FORUM FOR SERVICES OVER IP. (i3 FORUM) Interoperability Test Plan for International Voice services

Linking QoE and QoS on data services

NETWORK & SERVICE QUALITY BENCHMARKING REPORT: MOSCOW vs LONDON

Welcome to the 5G age

QUALITY OF SERVICE FRAMEWORK IN PAKISTAN. Yawar Yasin Director General (Enforcement) Pakistan Telecom Authority

Commonly Asked Questions for 4G Rates 1. What are the available 4G Combo Mobile plans To see our complete range of plans, please click here.

SE Memory Consumption

Vodafone Global FACTS

Benchmarking Methodology Working Group. Intended status: Informational Expires: April 17, 2019 October 14, 2018

DETERMINATION OF THE PERFORMANCE

P3 Insights Separate T-Mobile Binge On Fact from Fiction

Base Station Subsystem Key Performance Indicators in EGPRS

Hawaii Sprint Relay Store Wireless Order Form

ETSI TS V1.1.1 ( )

Link Master for VoLTE

An In-depth Study of LTE: Effect of Network Protocol and Application Behavior on Performance

Service Control EasyApp Measuring Quality of Experience

IxLoad Data Streaming (RTSP, RTP)

PILOT FLEET UNIFY PRODUCT OVERVIEW V2.5

Easy operation. Automatic tests. Dedicated NB-IoT measurement windows. Automatic device configuration. Intuitive user interface

ETSI TS V1.2.1 ( )

Pilot Walktour Datasheet V3.8 (Android)

P o w e r i n g N e t w o r k E x p e r i e n c e. Pilot Fleet Unify Product Overview v 2.7


NEW Smartphone Based QoS/QoE Validate and benchmark OTT services vs. telco services e.g. VoLTE vs. WhatsApp call etc.

Pilot Walktour FAQ V3.5 (Android)

The consumer mobile experience. Measuring the consumer experience of using Android mobile services

c) With the selective repeat protocol, it is possible for the sender to receive an ACK for a packet that falls outside of its current window.

NEMO 3.0 Product Description NetAxis Solutions

Pilot RCU 2.0 Release Note V10.10

TEMS Automatic

Bridging OPNFV and ETSI Yardstick and the methodology for pre-deployment validation of NFV Infrastructure

Multimedia Streaming. Mike Zink

Progress Report No. 3. A Case Study on Simulation Scenario

Quality of Mobile Services. Kingdom of Bahrain -

The War Between Mice and Elephants

Partner : Advocate IT Service 81 Broadway Asheville, NC United States. Customer: Sample Customer TrafficSim Report

Performance Evaluation of WiFiRe using OPNET

ECEN Final Exam Fall Instructor: Srinivas Shakkottai

Transcription:

CERTIFICATE P3 communications GmbH Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3, D 52070 Aachen, Germany hereby certifies that T Mobile Czech Republic a.s. Tomíčkova 2144/1, 148 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic achieved Best in Test with a Total Score of 908 of 1000 in the Mobile Benchmark Czech Republic 10/2017. (Score 352 of 400 in Telephony, Score 556 of 600 in Data Services) Maziar Kianzad Head of Network Testing & Benchmarking October 2017

Measurement Setup Voice Data Device Samsung Galaxy S7 cat9 Samsung Galaxy S7 cat9 Sony Xperia XZ cat9 Test Cases Mobile to Mobile (M2M) Side1 (4G preferred) to Side2 (4G preferred) Side1 (VoLTE) to Side2 (VoLTE) 115 sec call window 70 sec call duration 15 sec call setup timeout Multi RAB traffic injection on both sides Data 4G preferred CA HTTP DL datastream 7s HTTP UL datastream 7s HTTP 3MB DL fixed file transfer HTTP 1MB UL fixed file transfer Web Browsing Kepler ETSI Ref. Page 10 Live web pages (50% http / 50% https) 4 YouTube HD video ~ 45s Mobility and Route Types 100% Drivetest 54% in Cities, 20% in Towns and 26% on Roads Cities, towns and roads Samples ~ 5800 per Operator ~ 1900 per Operator Dates 15 measurement days 05.10.2017 21.10.2017 2

Testing Route Score Points and Breakdown The following table indicates the score points achieved by the networks under test in the modules Voice and Data Services as well as the breakdown of achieved points in the geographical categories Cities, Towns and Roads. Module Infrastructure Max. T Mobile Operator 2 Operator 3 Voice Total 400 352 311 309 Cities 240 88% 79% 81% Towns 80 91% 81% 79% Roads 80 86% 71% 63% Data Total 600 556 571 556 Cities 360 93% 96% 93% Towns 120 91% 93% 91% Roads 120 92% 95% 94% TOTAL 1.000 908 882 865 Shown voice, data and total scores are rounded 3

The following table indicates the achieved percentage of the maximum score in each of the different data services. Data Service Group Max. T Mobile Operator 2 Operator 3 Cities Web Browsing 108 97% 98% 97% File Download 90 87% 90% 82% File Upload 90 93% 97% 97% YouTube 72 95% 98% 95% Towns Web Browsing 36 97% 99% 98% File Download 30 84% 85% 81% File Upload 30 87% 92% 92% YouTube 24 95% 96% 95% Roads Web Browsing 36 95% 98% 95% File Download 30 91% 91% 87% File Upload 30 90% 94% 95% YouTube 24 93% 98% 98% Voice KPI Overview The following table indicates the achieved values of all networks under test in each of the relevant Voice Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the geographical categories Cities, Towns and Roads. Voice M2M KPI Name Unit T Mobile Operator 2 Operator 3 Cities Qualifier [%] 98,8 98,1 98,9 Call Setup Time [s] 3,3 5,4 5,6 AVG Speech Quality [MOS LQO] 3,4 3,5 3,3 Towns Qualifier [%] 99,3 98,6 98,7 Call Setup Time [s] 3,4 5,8 6,0 AVG Speech Quality [MOS LQO] 3,5 3,5 3,3 Roads Qualifier [%] 98,0 95,5 94,1 Call Setup Time [s] 4,0 6,4 6,8 AVG Speech Quality [MOS LQO] 3,4 3,5 3,2 4

Data KPI Overview The following table indicates the achieved values of all networks under test in each of the relevant Data Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the geographical categories Cities, Towns and Roads. Data Cities KPI Name Unit T Mobile Operator 2 Operator 3 HTTP Live Page DL Qualifier [%] 99,6 99,8 99,8 Time to first Byte [ms] 317 319 332 KBytes first second [KB] 519 553 502 HTTP Static Page DL Qualifier [%] 99,7 99,9 99,8 Overall Session Time [s] 1,2 1,1 1,3 HTTP file DL 3MB Qualifier [%] 100,0 100,0 99,8 AVG Session Time [s] 1,6 1,4 2,0 90% faster than [kbit/s] 9009 11356 6569 10% faster than [kbit/s] 62926 61022 47226 HTTP file UL 1MB Qualifier [%] 99,8 100,0 100,0 AVG Session Time [s] 0,9 0,8 0,8 90% faster than [kbit/s] 7263 8557 10390 10% faster than [kbit/s] 21053 23256 22409 HTTP DL FDTT 7s Qualifier [%] 99,9 99,9 99,8 AVG throughput [kbit/s] 51724 61377 32453 90% faster than [kbit/s] 13177 20408 7212 10% faster than [kbit/s] 99104 111142 75941 HTTP UL FDTT 7s Qualifier [%] 99,7 99,9 99,9 AVG throughput [kbit/s] 18914 27408 22201 90% faster than [kbit/s] 10164 11977 14064 10% faster than [kbit/s] 30305 41086 38622 YouTube Qualifier [%] 99,8 100,0 99,7 Start Time [s] 2,3 2,1 2,3 Playouts w/o interruptions [%] 99,1 99,7 99,3 AVG Resolution [p] 1076,1 1079,1 1070,4 5

Data Towns KPI Name Unit T Mobile Operator 2 Operator 3 HTTP Live Page DL Qualifier [%] 99,6 99,9 100,0 Time to first Byte [ms] 328 328 337 KBytes first second [KB] 518 546 508 HTTP Static Page DL Qualifier [%] 99,9 100,0 99,8 Overall Session Time [s] 1,2 1,1 1,2 HTTP file DL 3MB Qualifier [%] 99,8 100,0 100,0 AVG Session Time [s] 1,6 1,5 2,1 90% faster than [kbit/s] 7792 8343 6111 10% faster than [kbit/s] 56618 50526 36563 HTTP file UL 1MB Qualifier [%] 100,0 100,0 100,0 AVG Session Time [s] 1,0 0,9 0,9 90% faster than [kbit/s] 5772 6722 8724 10% faster than [kbit/s] 15748 18463 15717 HTTP DL FDTT 7s Qualifier [%] 99,1 99,8 99,8 AVG throughput [kbit/s] 45583 41066 25326 90% faster than [kbit/s] 12640 10870 8129 10% faster than [kbit/s] 88391 71572 46269 HTTP UL FDTT 7s Qualifier [%] 99,4 99,8 99,8 AVG throughput [kbit/s] 14635 18606 16733 90% faster than [kbit/s] 5785 8281 8853 10% faster than [kbit/s] 19338 29269 20985 YouTube Qualifier [%] 99,3 99,4 99,3 Start Time [s] 2,2 2,1 2,2 Playouts w/o interruptions [%] 99,6 100,0 99,8 AVG Resolution [p] 1075,5 1077,1 1074,4 6

Data Roads KPI Name Unit T Mobile Operator 2 Operator 3 HTTP Live Page DL Qualifier [%] 98,7 99,7 98,9 Time to first Byte [ms] 321 338 339 KBytes first second [KB] 510 530 499 HTTP Static Page DL Qualifier [%] 98,8 99,5 99,0 Overall Session Time [s] 1,1 1,1 1,3 HTTP file DL 3MB Qualifier [%] 99,5 99,8 99,5 AVG Session Time [s] 1,9 1,8 2,4 90% faster than [kbit/s] 7113 7246 5427 10% faster than [kbit/s] 51949 45096 39775 HTTP file UL 1MB Qualifier [%] 98,8 99,3 100,0 AVG Session Time [s] 1,2 1,1 0,9 90% faster than [kbit/s] 4215 5242 7646 10% faster than [kbit/s] 15711 17467 15892 HTTP DL FDTT 7s Qualifier [%] 98,5 99,3 99,5 AVG throughput [kbit/s] 34785 31710 23648 90% faster than [kbit/s] 9002 8565 5999 10% faster than [kbit/s] 66083 63390 47764 HTTP UL FDTT 7s Qualifier [%] 99,3 99,8 99,2 AVG throughput [kbit/s] 14857 17508 17602 90% faster than [kbit/s] 5943 7326 10274 10% faster than [kbit/s] 19831 22740 21546 YouTube Qualifier [%] 98,0 99,8 99,7 Start Time [s] 2,3 2,2 2,3 Playouts w/o interruptions [%] 100,0 99,8 99,7 AVG Resolution [p] 1076,0 1077,1 1073,9 7