ALBERTA LOTIC WETLAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR STREAMS AND SMALL RIVERS (Survey)

Similar documents
U. S. LENTIC WETLAND ECOLOGICAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT (Derived from U.S. Lentic Wetland Inventory Data) ,,,

LENTIC PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION (PFC) STANDARD CHECKLIST

BLANK DATASHEETS & TEMPLATES

Subdivision Application Form

Environmental Impact Questionnaire

N.J.P.L.S. An Introduction to LiDAR Concepts and Applications

Hamilton County Enhances GIS Base Mapping with 1-foot Contours

What is Integrated Land Management?

Applicant Type (Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Tract Map, etc.): Applicant: Address: Phone(s): Fax:

October 2001 (June 2002 revision) Greenpoint Tittabawassee River Dioxin Study Area Phase I Sampling Study Report

ALUS PAC MEETING AGENDA June 26, 2015

Existing Elevation Data Sets. Quality Level 2 (QL2) Lidar Data Sets. Better Land Characterization More Accurate Results!

Lecture 7 Attribute-based Operations

Contents. 1. Routing and Siting Process Routing and Siting Process Highlights Timeline Constraints Map

Riparian Areas Regulation Notification System Users Guide

Unique Well Identifiers. General Description

Notes: Notes: Notes: Notes:

Harris County Flood Control District HEC-RAS 2D Modeling Guidelines (Standardizing HEC-RAS 2D Models for Submittal Within Harris County)

What do you want to do? Is the plot already defined? Yes. 3 Creating Survey Data (SURVEYS tab) Start in new row Choose Plot Label from dropdown list

Invasive Alien Plant Program. Part 2. Modules 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4. Prepared by Range Branch. Ministry of Forests and Range

Obtaining Computing for Sustainable Water Project Output Files

APPENDIX E2. Vernal Pool Watershed Mapping

Peoria County Front Desk Map Application

Appendix B: Photo Review of Study Reaches

Stock Return Form User Guide for Individuals/Corporations. For Agricultural Dispositions

Using GIS To Estimate Changes in Runoff and Urban Surface Cover In Part of the Waller Creek Watershed Austin, Texas

Planning: Administrative Permits Instructions

APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL

As a GIS technician, your job will be to take the available data and develop suitability maps for the site.

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ArcView Utilities Extension User s Guide

F O R S A L E 2 Acre Outparcel Four Lane Exposure Gateway Corridor to Downtown 0 Kathleen Road, Lakeland, Florida 33801

Government of Alberta. Find Your Farm. Alberta Soil Information Viewer. Alberta Agriculture and Forestry [Date]

Making Topographic Maps

INTRODUCTION and REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS MODULE ONE

APPLICATION No. To the ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD RE:

This guide will tell you all you need to know about the new Front Desk application which can be found on the main Peoria County GIS website.

Module EDDMapS EDDMapS Map

Lheidli T enneh Final Agreement. Lands

HOW TO USE THE VERMONT DAM SCREENING TOOL

Lesson 7: Gathering Stand-Level Information

Vegetation Resources Inventory

Application of Data Management and Decision Support Tools to Support Coastal Wetland Management in the Laurentian Great Lakes

R1 R2 R3 C/I RC/I AP LR SC/I RP SP RESIDENTIAL *Single-Family Dwelling,

Protocol for Riparian Buffer Restoration Prioritization in Centre County and Clinton County

EXTRA TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION CASE ANALYSIS

Getting familiar with RECOVER

An Internet-Based Integrated Resource Management System (IRMS)

About Maps 1. Introduction Viewing your land online Accessing your land information Screen overview...

CIS-331 Exam 2 Fall 2015 Total of 105 Points Version 1

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Lecture 18: Spatial Modeling

GPS Located Accuracy Assessment Plots on the Modoc National Forest

Disaster Mitigation Projects in Polis. December 14, 2016

TUTORIAL MANUAL FOR THE PRAIRIE REGION INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES INVENTORY AND MAP DISPLAY

John Visser, P.Eng., Sr. Mgr., International Network Standards

This is the general guide for landuse mapping using mid-resolution remote sensing data

LiDAR Applications in Surveying and Engineering

CIS-331 Fall 2014 Exam 1 Name: Total of 109 Points Version 1

Lidar Talking Points Status of lidar collection in Pennsylvania Estimated cost and timeline

BRIEF EXAMPLES OF PRACTICAL USES OF LIDAR

Gateway Ascii Command Protocol

Contents of Lecture. Surface (Terrain) Data Models. Terrain Surface Representation. Sampling in Surface Model DEM

Airborne LiDAR Data Acquisition for Forestry Applications. Mischa Hey WSI (Corvallis, OR)

CIS-331 Fall 2013 Exam 1 Name: Total of 120 Points Version 1

P. A. Schuette A,B,E,F, J. E. Diffendorfer C, D. H. Deutschman A, S. Tremor B and W. Spencer D USA. 980, Denver, CO 80225, USA , USA.

2D Model Implementation for Complex Floodplain Studies. Sam Crampton, P.E., CFM Dewberry

v Prerequisite Tutorials GSSHA Modeling Basics Stream Flow GSSHA WMS Basics Creating Feature Objects and Mapping their Attributes to the 2D Grid

Adopted by La Mesa City Council July 9, 2013 Resolution

Multi-LCC Mississippi River Basin Gulf Hypoxia Initiative. ScienceBase and Data Basin User Guide

Biodiversity Interactive Map

Wednesday, July 15, Author: Eldris Ferrer Gonzalez, M.Sc. Engineering CSA Group

Travel Time and Time of Concentration

PUBLIC WORKS. 1oo. DiEital Fee Schedules. Effective January 1, 2008

EASTSIDE CITY OF BELLEVUE/ PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE

Vegetation Resources Inventory

Classification (or thematic) accuracy assessment. Lecture 8 March 11, 2005

Stem Beach Solar 1041 Application

The Gundaroo Police Paddock

Making ArcGIS Work for You. Elizabeth Cook USDA-NRCS GIS Specialist Columbia, MO

Development of the WGFD s Decision Support System

UMATILLA COUNTY SURVEYOR RECORDS

Pastures pro-rata coefficients Semi automatic classification in Italy AGEA

Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling Modeling with the Hydraulic Toolbox

COUNTY OF NEVADA PROJECT INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE

ENMAX Generation Portfolio Inc.

Singapore. Mr Soh Kheng Peng. Singapore Land Authority

Changes in the Phase 3 Indicator Field Guide Chapters from version 2.0 to version 3.0

GIS in agriculture scale farm level - used in agricultural applications - managing crop yields, monitoring crop rotation techniques, and estimate

Appendix E. HEC-RAS and HEC-Ecosystem Functions Models

SALE LEASE CALL CENTER

Workshops funded by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund

Canada s Fish Habitat Law. Fish - Water Quantity Interactions Okanagan Water Stewardship Council Meeting Oct 12, Kelowna, B.C.

CIS-331 Spring 2016 Exam 1 Name: Total of 109 Points Version 1

4. Specifications and Additional Information

PLSS 3 MILE RULE SUBDIVISION OF. Warm Springs Indian Reservation

BENTON COUNTY CODE BENTON COUNTY CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS - COMPLETE CHAPTER 3.04 BCC RESTRICTIONS ORD. 386, EFFECTIVE DOGS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

Land Cover Classification Techniques

Office of Geographic Information Systems

ELGA 2018 Application Questions

Accessing AIM Data. Instruction Manual. Connecting to AIM Data: TerrADat: Terrestrial AIM Database LMF: Landscape Monitoring Framework Database

Swan Creek BMP Retrofit Database User s Manual

Transcription:

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA A1. Field Data Collected by (Organization): A2. Funding Agency/Organization: A3. Date Field Data Collected: A6a. Is this site representative?: A6c. How was this site chosen?: A7a. Park(s)? (Yes; No): A7c. Name? A8a. Protected Areas? (Yes; No): A8c. Name(s)/: A9. Watershed Group Affiliation: A11. Is This Private Land? (Yes; No): A12a. Is This Rented Private Land? (Yes; No): A12c. Renter s Home Legal Land Description: A13a. Is this Public Land? (Yes; No): A13c. Land Manager s Name: LOCATION DATA B1. Province: B3a. Indian Reserve: B4a. Rural or Specialized Municipality: B5a. City/Town/Village: B6a. Waterbody Name: B7. Legal Land Location: B8a. Natural Region: B11a. Map Title(s): ALBERTA LOTIC WETLAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR STREAMS AND SMALL RIVERS (Survey) A15a. Has this polygon been inventoried before? (Yes; No): A15b. years sampled: A15c. Does this polygon coincide exactly with a previously inventoried polygon? (Yes; No): A15d. ID No.(s) of other inventories of this exact polygon:,,, A16a. Does this polygon share common area with other inventoried polygon(s), but is not exact? (Yes; No): A16b. ID No.(s) of other records sharing area with this polygon:,,, B2. Municipality or Reserve Type: B9a. Major Watershed (e.g. North Saskatchewan River): B10c. UTM coordinates of any other point of interest in the polygon: East: B10d. GPS Unit #: B10e. Comments: 1/4 1/4 Sec: 1/4 Sec: B9b. Minor Watershed (e.g. Battle River): B9c. Sub-basin (e.g. Iron Creek): B10a. UTM coordinates of polygon Upper end: : B10b. UTM coordinates of polygon Lower end: : B11b. Map Scale: A4. Year: A5. Observers: If Yes, A6b. choose category: A14a. Is this part of a grazing lease or grazing reserve? (Yes; No): A14c. Agricultural disposition No.: GRL: A17a. Has a change in management occurred? (Yes; No, Unknown): A17c. Type of management change applied: B6b. Side of Waterbody: Section: Township (NS): Range (EW): 1 Polygon No: ; North: WPt Upper: WPt Lower: WPt : B11c. Map Year: A11b. Owner s Name: A12b. Renter s Name: B3b. Military Reserve: B4b. Hamlet: B5b. SubdivPlan #: B5c. Block #: B8b. Sub-Region: ; Northing: ; Northing: B12. Aerial Photo Info: Scale: Date: Job#: Line#: GRP: A14d. Agricultural disposition Name (e.g., Community Pasture): A18. Primary Contact (Include agency name): A7b. Please Check all that apply: A8b. Please check all that apply: Ecological Environmental Municipal A10. Project Name: A13b. Type (Federal,Prov., Municipal): A13d. Land Manager s Title, Office/Dept: FGL: AS#: Photo#: Info: National Provincial A12d. County, if different than polygon: A14b. Lessee Name: Urban or Rural Muncipalities If Yes, A17b. Year changed occurred: Conservation Easement : Meridian: B5d. Lot #: GPS Projection: Check www.cowsandfish.org for latest Form,

SELECTED SUMMARY DATA C1. Water body type: C2. Polygon size (acres): ; (hect): C3a. Is the entire polygon an upland? (Yes; No): types? (Yes; No): C3c. Functional wetland (acres): C4. Does the polygon contain a defined streambank or channel? (Yes; No; NC): If No, C3b. Does the polygon consist entirely of functional wetland ; (hect): C5. Polygon length (river miles, usually the same as channel length) (mi): ; (km): C6. Number of river miles the polygon represents: ; (km): C7a. Average polygon width (usually same as width of the riparian zone) (ft): C7b. Riparian zone width range (ft): to ; (m): to ; (m): C3d. Percent of total polygon: C8. Habitat Types and Community Types Classification Type Name Phase Percent of Polygon Successional Stage or Comments/Guides Used OPTIONAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS D1a. Does the polygon has potential for tall woody type(s)? (Yes, No): D1b. Does the polygon has tall woody type(s) present? (Yes, No): D2a. Tree AND shrub removal by other than browse: None (0-5%); Light (6-25%); Moderate (26-50%); Heavy (>50%); NA; NC: D2b. Basis of Call: D3. Waterbody number (FMIS/Hydro code): D4a. Is water quality data available on this waterbody? (Yes, No, Unknown, NA): If Yes, D4b. Describe the reference for that data (name, year, etc.): D5. Detailed description of upper and lower ends and width (lateral boundaries) of the polygon: 2 Check www.cowsandfish.org for latest Form

PHOTOGRAPH DATA E1. Identification of photos (taken at the most upstream end of polygon): Photographer: Photo #: Upstream views/out of polygon (Describe Views) Camera Number: WPt Upper: Northing Zone Downstream views/into the polygon (Describe Views) E2. Identification of photos (taken at the most downstream end of polygon): Photographer: Photo #: Downstream views/out of polygon (Describe Views) Camera Number: WPt Lower: Northing Zone Upstream views/into the polygon (Describe Views) E3. photos of the polygon): WPt: Northing Zone Photo # Describe Views Photographer: Camera Number: E3a. Additional LOTIC photo page entered? (Yes; No): E4a. Is there an adjacent polygon upstream? (Yes; No): E5a. Is there an adjacent polygon downstream? (Yes; No): E6. Film and Camera Specs: Camera Type: Lens dia. (mm): Lens foc. len. (mm): E4b. Adjacent Poly Name Upstream: E5b. Adjacent Poly Name Downstream: Film Speed(ASA)/Image Quality (dpi): Filter used (polarizer or none): 3 Check www.cowsandfish.org for latest Form

1. Vegetative Cover of Floodplain and Streambanks 2a. Total Canopy Cover of Invasive Plant Species 2b. Density Distribution of Invasive Plant Species LOTIC WETLAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT SCORE SHEET Actual Score Possible Score Comment Data Record ID: List Invasive Plant Species present, including Percent Canopy Cover and Density Distribution Class: Can.Cov.Dens.Dist. Can.Cov. Dens.Dist. Can.Cov.Dens.Dist. blueweed: field bindweed: spotted knapweed: Canada thistle: leafy spurge: tall buttercup: caragana: nodding thistle: tamarisk/salt cedar: cleavers: ox-eye daisy: white cockle: common burdock: perennial sow-thistle: yellow toadflax: common hound s-tongue: purple loosestrife: common tansy: Russian knapweed: Dalmatian Toadflax: Russian olive: diffuse knapweed: scentless chamomile: s: downy chess: smooth perennial s: sow-thistle: European buckthorn: 2c. Are there elevated status species for this county? (Yes; No; NC): Elevated Sps 1: Elevated Sps 2: Elevated Sps 3: 3. Disturbance-Increaser Undesirable Herbaceous Species 4. Preferred Tree and Shrub Establishment and Regeneration 5a. Browse Util. of Preferred Trees and Shrubs 5b. Woody Veg. Removal other than Browsing 6. Standing Decadent and Dead Woody Material 7. Streambank Root Mass Protection 8. Human-Caused Bare Ground 9. Streambank Structurally Altered 10. Human Physical Alteration to the Rest of the Polygon 11. Stream Channel Incisement Vegetation Subtotal: Soil/Hydrology Subtotal: Overall Polygon Total: RATING CALCULATION Vegetation Rating: Soil / Hydrology: OVERALL: (Actual Score/Possible Score) X 100 = Rating Percent Descriptive Category Rating Percent Range Descriptive Category 80-100 Proper Functioning Condition (Healthy) 60-79 Functional At Risk (Healthy, but with Problems) <60 Nonfunctional (Unhealthy) 4 Check www.cowsandfish.org for latest Form

ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT CONCERNS Data Record ID: The following items do not contribute to a site s score. Rather they help to quantify inherent physical site characteristics or assess the direction of change on a site. These data can be useful for planning future site management. 12a. Polygon trend (Is the polygon: Improving, Degrading, Static, or Status Unknown?): (If status unknown answer NA to the sub-questions 12b and 12c) 12b. Has management influenced trend? (Yes; No; Unknown; NC; NA): 12c. Describe how health parameters have changed and justify your call. 13a. Streambank rock volume: 13b. Streambank rock size: 14. Vegetation use by animals: 15. Susceptibility of parent material to erosion: 16. Percent of streambank accessible to large animals: 17. Primary Land Use Sector: Agriculture Commercial Energy (Oil, Gas, Coal) Industrial (excl. other types listed) Forestry Recreation (excl. other types listed) Parks/Protected Areas Residential (excl. other types) Rural Residential (excl. other types listed) Acreage (excl. other types listed) Lakefront/Waterfront (excl. other types listed) Transportation Utility Institutional Military Open/Vacant 18a and b: Break down the polygon and the area adjacent to the polygon into the land uses listed (must total to approx. 100%): a) Polygon b) Adjacent No land use apparent: Turf grass (lawn): Tame pasture (grazing): Native pasture (grazing): Recreation (ATV paths, campsites, etc.): Development (buildings, corrals, paved lots, etc.): Tilled Cropping: Perennial forage (e.g., alfalfa hayland): Roads: Logging: Mining: Railroads: : Description of Usage Noted: 19. Comments and Observations: 5 Check www.cowsandfish.org for latest Form