IMRT site-specific procedure: Prostate (CHHiP)

Similar documents
The MSKCC Approach to IMRT. Outline

GPU applications in Cancer Radiation Therapy at UCSD. Steve Jiang, UCSD Radiation Oncology Amit Majumdar, SDSC Dongju (DJ) Choi, SDSC

How would, or how does, the patient position (chin extended) affect your beam arrangement?

IMSURE QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE QA SOFTWARE

radiotherapy Andrew Godley, Ergun Ahunbay, Cheng Peng, and X. Allen Li NCAAPM Spring Meeting 2010 Madison, WI

ICARO Vienna April Implementing 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT in clinical practice: Recommendations of IAEA- TECDOC-1588

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Implementation. Outline. Acknowledgement. History of VMAT. IMAT Basics of IMAT

8/4/2016. Emerging Linac based SRS/SBRT Technologies with Modulated Arc Delivery. Disclosure. Introduction: Treatment delivery techniques

Coverage based treatment planning to accommodate organ deformable motions and contouring uncertainties for prostate treatment. Huijun Xu, Ph.D.

Monaco Concepts and IMRT / VMAT Planning LTAMON0003 / 3.0

Basic Radiation Oncology Physics

IAEA-TECDOC-1583 Commissioning of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Systems: Testing for Typical External Beam Treatment Techniques

ROBUST OPTIMIZATION THE END OF PTV AND THE BEGINNING OF SMART DOSE CLOUD. Moe Siddiqui, April 08, 2017

Creating a Knowledge Based Model using RapidPlan TM : The Henry Ford Experience

FAST, precise. qa software

A Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System

VALIDATION OF DIR. Raj Varadhan, PhD, DABMP Minneapolis Radiation Oncology

A Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System

Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., UCSF. Pam Akazawa, CMD, UCSF. Cynthia Chuang, Ph.D., UCSF

7/29/2017. Making Better IMRT Plans Using a New Direct Aperture Optimization Approach. Aim of Radiotherapy Research. Aim of Radiotherapy Research

Using a research real-time control interface to go beyond dynamic MLC tracking

Tomotherapy Physics. Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance. Emilie Soisson, MS

Tumor motion during liver SBRT

Volume Interaction Techniques in the Virtual Simulation of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning

Facility Questionnaire PART I (General Information for 3DCRT and IMRT)

Secondary 3D Dose QA Fully Automated using MOSAIQ's IQ Engine. MOSAIQ User Meeting May Antwerp

3DVH FAQs. What is PDP questions

URGENT IMPORTANT FIELD SAFETY NOTIFICATION

7/31/2011. Learning Objective. Video Positioning. 3D Surface Imaging by VisionRT

Code of practice: Create a verification plan for OCTAVIUS Detector 729 in Philips Pinnacle³

Dosimetric impact of the 160 MLC on head and neck IMRT treatments

Evaluation of 3D Gamma index calculation implemented in two commercial dosimetry systems

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH. The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

NEW METHOD OF COLLECTING OUTPUT FACTORS FOR COMMISSIONING LINEAR ACCELERATORS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS

Use of Monte Carlo modelling in radiotherapy linac design. David Roberts, PhD Senior Physicist Elekta

Auto-Segmentation Using Deformable Image Registration. Disclosure. Objectives 8/4/2011

Current state of multi-criteria treatment planning

THE WIRELESS PHANTOM PERFORM ACCURATE PATIENT QA IN LESS TIME THAN EVER!

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

ATC Conformance Statement Overview

Hugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France. Sunday 17 July 2016

A SYSTEM OF DOSIMETRIC CALCULATIONS

Integrated proton-photon treatment planning

High Throughput Computing and Sampling Issues for Optimization in Radiotherapy

The IORT Treatment Planning System. radiance. GMV, 2012 Property of GMV All rights reserved

A fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: A Monte Carlo study

Initial Clinical Experience with 3D Surface Image Guidance

DOSIMETRY/ RADIATION THERAPY TERMS

CONTOURING ACCURACY. What Have We Learned? And Where Do We Go From Here? BEN NELMS, PH.D. AUGUST 15, 2016

1. Learn to incorporate QA for surface imaging

Dose Calculation and Optimization Algorithms: A Clinical Perspective

MINIMAX OPTIMIZATION FOR HANDLING RANGE AND SETUP UNCERTAINTIES IN PROTON THERAPY

8/3/2016. Image Guidance Technologies. Introduction. Outline

Dynalog data tool for IMRT plan verification

The Dose Junction Issue Associated with Photon Beams for Large Volume Radiation Therapy and the Sensitivity to Set-up Error

Analysis of RapidArc optimization strategies using objective function values and dose-volume histograms

A Mimetic Algorithm for Simultaneous Multileaf Collimator Aperture Shape and Dosimetric Optimization in CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery

State-of-the-Art IGRT

An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors

3DVH : SUN NUCLEAR On The Accuracy Of The corporation Planned Dose Perturbation Algorithm Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools *Patent Pending

Chapter 7 Feasibility Study for 3D Online Motion Compensation

Radiotherapy Plan Competition TomoTherapy Planning System. Dmytro Synchuk. Ukrainian Center of TomoTherapy, Kirovograd, Ukraine

IMRT and VMAT Patient Specific QA Using 2D and 3D Detector Arrays

Monaco VMAT. The Next Generation in IMRT/VMAT Planning. Paulo Mathias Customer Support TPS Application

Dosimetric Analysis Report

An Optimisation Model for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Iterative regularization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy optimization. Carlsson, F. and Forsgren, A. Med. Phys. 33 (1), January 2006.

Photon beam dose distributions in 2D

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL IMAGING- 3D LOCALIZATION LAB MANUAL 1. Modifications for P551 Fall 2013 Medical Physics Laboratory

Helical Tomotherapy Qualitative dose Delivery Verification

PCRT 3D. Scalable Architecture System. User-Friendly. Traceable. Continuos Development

Optimization in Brachytherapy. Gary A. Ezzell, Ph.D. Mayo Clinic Scottsdale

Computational modelling and analysis: IOP Medical Physics Group

An Automated Image-based Method for Multi-Leaf Collimator Positioning Verification in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Using Pinnacle 16 Deformable Image registration in a re-treat scenario

iplan RT Image Advanced Contouring Workstation - Driving Physician Collaboration

ATTENTION! The whole content of the lecture with all the animations can be dowloaded from:

Is deformable image registration a solved problem?

Applied Optimization Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)

A secondary monitor unit calculation algorithm using superposition of symmetric, open fields for IMRT plans

A comparative analysis for verification of IMRT and VMAT treatment plans using a 2-D and 3-D diode array

Commissioning of a 3D image-based treatment planning system for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer

Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning

Chapter 9 Field Shaping: Scanning Beam

3D Conformal RT: Technical outline and Process. Kazi S Manir

Dose Distributions. Purpose. Isodose distributions. To familiarize the resident with dose distributions and the factors that affect them

Radiation therapy treatment plan optimization

Anthropomorphic Verification of the Eclipse AAA Algorithm for Spine SBRT Treatments Involving Titanium Implants

Trajectory optimization for dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy

Real Time Tumor Motion Tracking with CyberKnife

System Messages for MRIdian 4.1

Application of polynomial chaos in proton therapy

Fast dose algorithm for generation of dose coverage probability for robustness analysis of fractionated radiotherapy

CHAPTER 9 INFLUENCE OF SMOOTHING ALGORITHMS IN MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATIONS OF CYBERKNIFE TREATMENT PLANS: A LUNG PHANTOM STUDY

Automated Image Analysis Software for Quality Assurance of a Radiotherapy CT Simulator

Data. ModuLeaf Mini Multileaf Collimator Precision Beam Shaping for Advanced Radiotherapy

New algorithms for target delineation and radiation delivery in intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Finite Element Simulation of Moving Targets in Radio Therapy

Transcription:

IMRT site-specific procedure: Prostate (CHHiP) Scope: To provide site specific instructions for the planning of CHHIP IMRT patients Responsibilities: Radiotherapy Physicists, HPC Registered Therapy Radiographers (Pre-Treatment), Clinical Oncologists Definitions: Documentation: IMRT Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy OARs Organs at Risk VOIs Volumes of Interest GTV Gross Tumour Volume CTV Clinical Target Volume PTV Planning Target Volume CHHiP Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer IMRT Contouring CHHIP IMRT Contouring form IMRT planning IMRT plan write-up IMRT preparation for patient-specific QC 1. Context This work instruction describes the parts of the IMRT planning and QC process that are specific to CHHIP IMRT plans. It should be read in conjunction with the documents IMRT contouring, IMRT planning, IMRT: Plan write-up and IMRT: Preparation for QC. 2. ProSoma 2.1 Table 1 identifies the volumes which require contouring on ProSoma and indicates who should perform the contouring.the relevant volumes should have already been outlined in Prosoma by the Dr and Phys/Rad and exported to Image Server. Volumes are listed in Table 1. Replaces Page 1 of 7

VOI name VOI type Contoured by Bladder ORGAN Phys/Rad Bowel (IMRT) ORGAN Phys GTV1 (Prostate) GTV Dr GTV2 (Prostate + Dr GTV SV) L Femoral Head ORGAN Phys/Rad R Femoral Head ORGAN Phys/Rad Rectum (IMRT) ORGAN Phys Urethral Bulb ORGAN Dr Table 1: Volumes for contouring on ProSoma 2.2 Check the bladder volume falls within the range 200 400cc. If outside this range, investigate. For very small bladder volumes (approx less than 185cc), the patient will need to drink more water and be rescanned. A large bladder volume may not be comfortably reproducible. 2.3 When contouring the femoral heads, check that the shape is smooth in each orthogonal plane and edit any spikes. 2.4 When drawing rectum, the CHHiP trial requires it to start at the anus and be contoured up to the recto-sigmoid junction (the junction between rectum and bowel). This is usually where the organ turns anteriorly and to the left. The rectum is typically 10-12cm long. 2.5 All loops of bowel should be included, with bowel being contoured at least 2cm sup of the PTV1 (3cm sup of GTV2). This can be started on ProSoma but must be finished on OMP 2.6 OMP after the final margin growing. a. The clinician must check the Clinical Data form and the patient s risk group before drawing the appropriate CTV/GTVs. 2.7 After the GTV1 (Prostate) has been contoured, select Copy VOI. Double click on the copied VOI and choose the name GTV2 (Prostate and SV) from the list. This will ensure that the prostate part of the GTVs is identical. 2.8 Record all data onto the CHHIP contouring form, save the structure set and send to OMP. Replaces Page 2 of 7

3. Contouring on OMP 3.1 After the CT slices and RT Structure set are imported into OMP, additional VOIs (for example planning PTVs and pseudo structures) are created from the relevant template. See the general IMRT Contouring procedure. 3.2 Need to outline the body contour in OMP. 3.3 Approve any structures grown by the Dr to prevent any unintentional editing. After editing any OARs to avoid overlap with the CTV/GTVs, grow appropriate PTVs according to Table 2 below. Use the Boolean operator to create PTV1- PTV2 and PTV2-PTV3, (ie: PTV1 Sub PTV2) Use the Boolean operator with post-processing (0.5cm 3 ) on PTV1-PTV2 to clean the VOI. Check that no significant area of this structure is removed. Final VOI Grow from VOI Margin PTV3 GTV1 0.5cm 3D, 0 margin POST, avoid rectum PTV2 PTV3 0.5cm 3D PTV1 GTV2 1cm 3D Table 2: Margins for CHHiP Patients 3.4 Observe the rectal distortion if the patient is in the CHHiP trial. Refer to the CHHiP Trial Protocol. If the distortion is moderate to large, discuss with the clinician on which slices a variable margin is to be used for PTV2. Make a note in the comments box on the contouring form. 3.5 Use the Boolean operator with post-processing (0.5cm 3 ) on PTV1-PTV2 to clean the VOI. Check that no significant area of this structure is removed. 3 3.1 Record the final OMP volumes on the CHHiP Trial Contouring form, with the clinician s signature and date. All volumes are to be checked by another physicist. 3.2 It is good practice to create planning volumes to which the user constraints are applied. Create a Pseudo PTV1-PTV2, Pseudo PTV2-PTV3 and Pseudo PTV3 (do not use Planner initials). Then click on PTV1-PTV2, Copy Structure and Paste Structure Over Structure onto Pseudo PTV1-PTV2. Similarly for Pseudo PTV2-PTV3 and Pseudo PTV3. 3.3 Also create a Pseudo Rectum, Pseudo Bladder and Pseudo Bowel using the Crop Structure option. These pseudo OAR volumes should be cropped to 0.5 cm from the PTVs. Replaces Page 3 of 7

4 Planning 4.1 Before inserting the beam template, move the User Origin to align with the tattoos on the central (Z = 0.00) slice. The isocentre should be positioned to coincide with the reference marks unless this would place it outside the PTV; in this situation it should be moved by a whole number of cm, ideally in one direction only, to place it within the PTV. A 5-field coplanar plan is used - the approved plan template IMRT CHHIP will automatically add the appropriate fields. Select PTV3 as the target volume 4.2 In some cases it may be advantageous to adjust the angle of the posterior obliques to best match the shape of the PTV volume at the posterior edge. Look at the BEV for each field and ensure good coverage of the PTVs. 4.3 Typical starting DVH constraints are as given in Table 3 (assuming 74Gy/37# to PTV3): Organ Constraint Volume (%) Dose (cgy) Priority type Pseudo PTV1-PTV2 Lower 100 5630 70 Upper* 50 5930 50 Upper 0 6740 70 Pseudo PTV2-PTV3 Lower 100 6740 70 Upper 50 7120 50 Upper 10 7100 70 Pseudo PTV3 Lower 100 7100 70 Upper 50 7400 50 Upper 0 7500 70 (Pseudo) Rectum Upper 0 7400 20 (Pseudo) Bowel Upper 0 5500 20 (Pseudo) Bladder Upper 0 7400 20 Table 3: Starting DVH constraints for CHHiP patients * In some cases, the plan will tend to deliver a low median dose to PTV1; in this case, this constraint should be set as a lower constraint. The optimisation should initially be run concentrating on PTV coverage/homogeneity. If necessary, modifications to the Pseudo PTVs should be made to improve coverage. To optimise, click on Planning Optimise. In the optimisation window, ensure that the Normal Tissue Objective Parameters has the distance from target border set to 0.5 cm. The Priority is set to 150, Smoothing Values X=60 and Y=60. Minimise Dose = 0, Fixed Jaws UNTICKED and Field Weight = 1.0. Click OK then start with the values given in Table 3. Replaces Page 4 of 7

4.4 Usually get an acceptable distribution after about 25 iterations. Then only turn on the DVHs of interest to get a better overview of how the algorithm is performing. When DVHs are acceptable, click on OK. 4.7 Then go to Planning Plan Normalisation - % of Target Volume (100% covers 50% of Target volume) OK. 4.8 Once the PTV doses are acceptable, the optimisation should be paused and line constraints drawn for Pseudo Bowel, Pseudo Bladder and Pseudo Rectum, initially following the current DVH of these structures (note: it may be preferable to use pseudo structures which exclude the PTV). These line constraints can then be gradually dragged across to the left as the optimisation proceeds to improve OAR sparing. 4.9 Plans should be assessed to ensure they fulfil the dose-volume criteria on the CHHIP plan assessment form. Additionally, the dose distribution should be carefully examined to ensure there are no hotspots outside PTVs (remember ICRU recommendations), that there are no areas of significant dose (>80%) at beam entry points and that the high dose regions conform well to the PTVs. 4.10 Also observe the fluences for each field to ensure there are no regions of high and low dose immediately adjacent to each other and that no bands of high dose are visible. Some Fluence Editing may be necessary to reduce the required number of MUs for the plan. 4.11 If the fluences are satisfactory then run the MLC movie to guage whether most MU delivery corresponds to a large Average Leaf Pair Opening. 4 Plan write-up a. DRRs should be generated as follows: i. For patients without implanted markers, use the bones.dps parameter set. ii. For patients with markers, use the IGRT markers.dps parameter set. It may be necessary to adjust the weights of the two sets of parameters used in the DRR generation in order to best visualise the markers. iii. Set the field size to encompass an adequate amount of the pelvis for accurate EPI matching (see Fig. 1) Replaces Page 5 of 7

Fig. 1a: Typical ANT ISO Set Up Field DRR. 4 4. Fig. 1b: Typical RT LAT ISO Set Up Field DRR. 5. QC plan preparation a. When setting up the phantom QC plan, the isocentre and chamber depths will generally be 9cm deep, and it is usually unnecessary to shift the isocentre from the phantom centre. Replaces Page 6 of 7

References: Document seen and agreed by Lead Clinical Oncologist (Signed) Dated.. Radiotherapy Services Manager (Signed).. Dated. Head of Radiotherapy Physics (Signed) Dated.. Replaces Page 7 of 7