Verification Plan: Mitchell Hammock Road. Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System. Prepared by: City of Oviedo. Draft 1: June 2015

Similar documents
Real-time Adaptive Control System. Technical White Paper. September 2012 Trafficware SynchroGreen Technical White Paper

Product Type: Centracs

3. If so, was this taken into consideration when designing the RFP?

LOS ANGELES COUNTYWIDE INFORMATION EXCHANGE NETWORK SITE INTEGRATION SITE SERVER TEST PROCEDURES

LAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

RITIS Training Module 4 Script

Sparta Systems TrackWise Digital Solution

Information Security Policy

Updating NTCIP 1202 (Actuated Signal Controllers) to Support a Connected Vehicle Environment. Authors

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Arterial Performance Measures Framework

Operation of Closed Loop Signal Systems

MAASTO TPIMS Systems Engineering Analysis. Documentation

NMCS2 MIDAS Outstation Algorithm Specification

Crystal Springs Upland School Transportation Demand Management Plan. March 2016

Chattanooga Regional ITS Architecture Update Project Overview. January 7, 2014

The City of Mississauga may install Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Traffic Monitoring System cameras within the Municipal Road Allowance.

Open Data Policy City of Irving

Message exchange with. Finnish Customs

Epicor ERP Cloud Services Specification Multi-Tenant and Dedicated Tenant Cloud Services (Updated July 31, 2017)

Site Visitor Requirements Practice

Naztec Version 50 Software TS-1, TS-2, 170E, 2070N. Training Unit 1 Basic Features

GSN Cloud Contact Centre Customer Connectivity Datasheet

Siting Principles Subcommittee

CITY OF KIRKLAND TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

SYSTEM CONFIGURATION AND FUNCTIONAL OUTLINE OF MPD ROAD TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER

HPE Data Replication Solution Service for HPE Business Copy for P9000 XP Disk Array Family

HPE 3PAR Remote Copy Extension Software Suite Implementation Service

RITIS Training Module 9 Script

Arterial data quality and traffic estimation

Deployment of ITS Projects in Pasadena A Local Agency Perspective

Appendix D The Need for a Systems Engineering Process Federal Rule 940

Concept Definition Report Adaptive Urban Signal Control Integration (AUSCI) Project. Executive Summary -- August 1995

APPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION

Opportunities To Succeed

Managing DC Work Zones: DDOT s Citywide Transportation Management Plan

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

South Central ROP Projects

Johnson City Regional ITS Architecture Update Review Workshop. March 12, 2015

CONTROL OF DOCUMENTS

Community Advisory Committee. June 5, 2017

SIDRA INTERSECTION 7.0 UPDATE HISTORY

Sparta Systems TrackWise Solution

People. Processes. Integrating Globally.

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 977 METERING PROTOCOL

Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures (ATSPM): Pilot Testing in NC

ITS DEVICE INTEGRATION AND TESTING

Level 1 Certificate in Reception Services ( )

Service Description: Identity Services Engine Implementation-Subscription Service

TM2.0 Enabling vehicle interaction with traffic management. TF3 Principles for data. Report

IT Governance ISO/IEC 27001:2013 ISMS Implementation. Service description. Protect Comply Thrive

INFORMATION ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE

WIRELESS DEVICES: ACCEPTABLE USE AND GUIDELINES

System Requirements VERSION 2.5. Prepared for: Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Prepared by: April 17,

UC for Enterprise (UCE) Emergency On Site Notification (E-OSN)

Project Management Pre-Implementation Project status reporting Post Implementation Assessment Phase Solidify Project Scope

Appendix 6 Operational Support Systems Change Management Plan

SatGuide Symbian User Manual. SatGuide Symbian OS USER MANUAL

IT CONTINUITY, BACKUP AND RECOVERY POLICY

NCTCOG MTP Policy Bundle Application for TXDOT

Page 1 of 15. Applicability. Compatibility EACMS PACS. Version 5. Version 3 PCA EAP. ERC NO ERC Low Impact BES. ERC Medium Impact BES

Engaging Maryland toward CAV advancements Christine Nizer, Administrator

RITIS Training Module 10 Script. To return to the Florida Analytics main page, select Florida Analytics Tools in the upper left corner of the page.

ARE YOU ADAPTIVE? (From a Traffic Signal Perspective)

Monitoring Replication

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

WIRELESS DEVICES: ACCEPTABLE USE AND GUIDELINES

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL

Collaborative Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Initiatives with Neighbouring Jurisdictions

REVISION HISTORY DATE AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT

Framework for building information modelling (BIM) guidance

FINAL REPORT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANNING OFFICE. on Project. Improvements and Enhancements to LOSPLAN 2007

HP 3PAR Storage System Installation and Startup Service

Auckland Traffic Management Unit Traffic Signal Design Review Guidelines. Version 1.0

INFORMATION ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE

Sparta Systems Stratas Solution

Solution Pack. Managed Services Virtual Private Cloud Security Features Selections and Prerequisites

Criteria for SQF Training Courses

Road Intersections Near Level Crossings: Intersection Awareness in Illinois. Brian Vercruysse Illinois Commerce Commission

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 20, 2014

Electronic Records and Signatures with the Sievers M9 TOC Analyzer and DataPro2 Software

PRIME FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Attachment C Service Level Agreement for WAN and Internet

<PROJECT NAME> IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Supplemental Information

Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

Acyclica Congestion Management. By Sarah King Regional Sales Manager Control Technologies

State of Colorado Cyber Security Policies

Executive Summary. City of Goodyear. Prepared for: Prepared by: November, 2008 Copyright 2008, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Veirs Mill Road Metrobus Improvements Request to Conduct Public Hearing

Connected & Automated Vehicle Activities

Introduction to Internet of Things Prof. Sudip Misra Department of Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

UDOT Freeway and Traffic Signal Performance Metrics

Creating transportation system intelligence using PeMS. Pravin Varaiya PeMS Development Group

OpenChain Specification Version 1.3 (DRAFT)

IT Managed Services. Schedule 1 Specification 11/07/18

AppPulse Point of Presence (POP)

ONBOARDING APPLICATION

NCHRP Project Impacts of Connected Vehicles and Automated Vehicles on State and Local Transportation Agencies

Case Studies: Using Signal Performance Metrics to Optimize Traffic Signal Operations. March 6, 2018

Transcription:

Verification Plan: Mitchell Hammock Road Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System Red Bug Lake Road from Slavia Road to SR 426 Mitchell Hammock Road from SR 426 to Lockwood Boulevard Lockwood Boulevard from Mitchell Hammock Road to CR 419 Prepared by: City of Oviedo Draft 1: June 2015 Document Approval Status City of Oviedo Approval Signature Date Seminole County Approval Signature Date 1

1. Purpose of Document This document describes how the system will be tested to ensure that it meets the requirements as defined in the Requirements Document. The document describes the activities which verify that the system being built meets the user needs and scenarios developed in the concept of operations, by fulfilling the requirements described in the Requirements Document. The following levels of verification are defined: A plan to initially lay out the specific verification effort The verification plan that defines a mapping of the requirements to verification cases The needs to be addressed by the system were identified in the Concept of Operations. The needs were also related to the requirements in the combined requirements, requirements traceability verification matrix and verification methods table in the Requirements Document. In a similar manner, to ensure rigor in verification, each requirement will be related to a verification case and then to appropriate steps in the verification procedures. Detailed procedures for data collection and analysis will not be defined at this stage. The detailed procedures that will map to the verification plan will be developed by the system supplier or vendor, and approved by City of Oviedo, once the system has been installed. Conducting the verification is the responsibility of the system supplier or vendor. The verification tests will be witnessed by City of Oviedo or representative and the results will be audited by City of Oviedo or representative. The signal system will make use of adaptive coordinated traffic signal technology to improve traffic conditions along the corridor depicted in the illustration below. 2. Scope This document addresses the system engineering needs for the Mitchell Hammock Road Adaptive Traffic Signal System. The signal system will make use of adaptive coordinated traffic signal technology to improve traffic conditions along the corridor depicted in the illustration below. 2

Figure 1 Corridor Map The intended audience for the document includes both public and private sector partners responsible for planning, design, implementation, operations and maintenance of the system. The document is also intended to provide the required information for federal and Florida Department of Transportation approval. Finally the document is expected to be used by the selected vendor as guidance for system design and implementation. 3. Referenced documents The following documents are referenced in this document. 1. Concept of Operations: Mitchell Hammock Road Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Project 2. Requirements Document: Mitchell Hammock Road Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Project 4. Conducting Verification Participating organizations and identification of roles and responsibilities Table 1 in the concept of operations defined the roles and responsibilities for each of the participants in the project. For the purposes of verification planning it is necessary to add additional detail regarding the implementation phase of the project in order to define roles and responsibilities for verification and validation activities. Table 1 from the concept of opposite operations is replicated here for ease of access and table 2 shows more detailed responsibilities for verification and validation. Table 1 from the Concept of Operations Will Participant Planning City of Oviedo / Seminole County Design Vendor Implementation Vendor Operations Seminole County Maintenance Seminole County 3

Table 2 Roles and responsibilities for verification and validation Responsibility Plan verification Define verification procedures conduct verification and report results Witness verification Plan validation Conduct validation and report results Witness validation Participant City of Oviedo or representative Vendor Vendor City of Oviedo or representative City of Oviedo or representative City of Oviedo or representative City of Oviedo or representative Location of the verification effort The location of the verification effort will be in the field beside the deployed field equipment along the corridor described in the Concept of Operations. Some additional verification tasks will also require to be conducted at the Seminole County TMC and the City of Oviedo TMC. At the discretion of City of Oviedo and Seminole County traffic engineering staff, all of the verification work may be carried out at the Seminole County TMC subject to availability of suitable remote facilities for verification tests. 4

Equipment and software configuration The actual deployed hardware and software configuration will be used for all of the verification cases. A block diagram illustrating the required hardware and software configuration for verification and testing is shown below. Fiber Interconnect or backbone New Equipment Panel Vehicle detection New Adaptive Control processor Keyboard (For Programming) Existing Traffic controller Monitor (For Programming) Figure 1 Required hardware and software configuration for verification testing Documents to be prepared to support the verification Detailed verification procedures shall be developed by the vendor based on verification planning guidance contained in this document. These detailed verification procedures shall include the definition of documentation required for verification, a verification report outline and a description of any special equipment and software required to conduct verification. It shall also contain details of the proposed arrangements for actual conduct of the verification including notification of participants, proposed management arrangements for the verification, procedures for approving last minute changes to the procedures and procedures for handling a failure. 5. Verification Identification Verification cases have been developed in order to match the needs statements and requirements specified in the Concept of Operations and the Requirements Document. It is expected that the vendor will use the verification cases as the basis for developing a detailed approach to verification execution and management. The detailed approach to be developed by the vendor should include the definition of data to be recorded or noted during verification such as expected results of a step. It shall also include 5

validation data for system performance, statement of the pass fail criteria and a description of the verification configuration to be used. This should include deployed hardware and any special hardware and software required specifically for testing The verification cases with IDs number one through 11 are contained in Appendix A. Each verification case describes the objective of the verification and the complete list of requirements to be verified. This also shows the relationship between the requirements identified in the Requirements Document and the verification cases described. 6

Appendix A: Verification Cases 7

Verification Case ID: 1 Verification Case Name: Smooth the flow of traffic along coordinated routes and improve travel time reliability Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below The Adaptive Signal System must be able to assess volume and delay of individual movements (as prescribed in 999.001 (project the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures established by the Transportation Research Board of the specific) National Academies of Science in the United States) in real time to optimize signalization. 999.002 (project specific) 999.003 (project specific) 999.004(project specific) 999.005 (project specific) The Adaptive Signal System shall optimize the flow of traffic at both intersections and arterials based on the possible states of traffic rather than required splits, cycles and offsets. The Adaptive Signal System must be able to perform adaptive calculations without regularly relying on recalculating offsets to perform adaptive operations. The Adaptive Signal System must have the ability to adjust green time without a per cycle maximum permitted adjustment. The Adaptive Signal System must be able to operate without a traditional timing plan, and without being dependent upon, any traditional timing plans. When current measured traffic conditions meet user- defined criteria, the Adaptive Signal System shall alter 2.1.1.0-7.0-4 the state of signal controllers providing two-way progression on a coordinated route The Adaptive Signal System shall calculate the appropriate state of the signal to suit the current coordination 2.3.0-2 strategy at the critical signal controller. (A critical signal controller is defined by the user). At non-critical intersections within a group, the Adaptive Signal System shall calculate the time at which a userspecified traffic sequence shall be green, relative to a reference point at the critical intersection, to suit the 2.3.0-3 current coordination strategy The Adaptive Signal System shall calculate lengths for all sequences at each signal controller to suit the current 2.2.0-3 coordination strategy. The Adaptive Signal System shall detect repeated sequences that do not serve all waiting vehicles. (These 2.1.1.0-9 failures may be inferred, such as by detecting repeated max-out.) 2.1.1.0-9.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System shall alter operations, to minimize repeated failures. 8

Verification Case ID: 2 Verification Case Name: not used Verification Objective: 9

Verification Case ID: 3 Verification Case Name: Manage queues, to prevent excessive queuing from reducing efficiency Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below When queues are detected at user-specified locations, the Adaptive Signal System shall execute user-specified 2.1.3.0-2 timing plan/operational mode. The Adaptive Signal System shall calculate offsets to suit the current coordination strategy for the user- 2.2.0-4 specified reference point for each signal controller along a coordinated route within a group. When current measured traffic conditions meet user- specified criteria, the Adaptive Signal System shall alter the state of signal controllers, preventing queues from exceeding the storage capacity at user-specified 2.1.1.0-7.0-2 locations 2.1.3.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System shall detect the presence of queues at pre-configured locations. When queues are detected at user-specified locations, the Adaptive Signal System shall execute user-specified 2.1.3.0-3 adaptive operation strategy. 10

Verification Case ID: 4 Verification Case Name: Preserve the legacy hardware and software to protect sunk investment in capital equipment Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below The Adaptive Signal System shall make maximum use of existing equipment and interface with existing controllers. It shall not be necessary to replace existing controller or cabinet hardware and all additional 10.0-1 equipment shall be supplemental rather than substitutional. 11

Verification Case ID: 5 Verification Case Name: Enable traffic signal timings to be better aligned with variations in traffic flow Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below When current measured traffic conditions meet user- specified criteria, the Adaptive Signal System shall alter 2.1.1.0-7.0-1 the state of the signal controllers, maximizing the throughput of the coordinated route. When current measured traffic conditions meet user- specified criteria, the Adaptive Signal System shall alter the state of signal controllers, preventing queues from exceeding the storage capacity at user-specified 2.1.1.0-7.0-2 locations. When current measured traffic conditions meet user- specified criteria, the Adaptive Signal System shall alter 2.1.1.0-7.0-3 the state of signal controllers providing equitable distribution of green times. When current measured traffic conditions meet user- defined criteria, the Adaptive Signal System shall alter 2.1.1.0-7.0-4 the state of signal controllers providing two-way progression on a coordinated route. The Adaptive Signal System shall adjust signal timing so that vehicles approaching a signal that have been 2.3.0-5 served during a user-specified at an upstream signal do not stop. 7.0-6 The Adaptive Signal System shall provide a minimum of 10 different user- defined sequences for each signal. 7.0-6.0-3 Each permissible sequence shall be executable based on measured traffic conditions. 7.0-7 The Adaptive Signal System shall not prevent an overlap output by time-of-day. 7.0-8 The Adaptive Signal System shall not prevent an overlap output based on an external input. 1.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System shall control a minimum of 50 intersections concurrently 1.0-2 The Adaptive Signal System shall support groups of signals. 1.0-2.0-2 The Adaptive Signal System shall control a minimum of 10 groups of signals. 1.0-2.0-4 Each group shall operate independently The boundaries surrounding signal controllers that operate in a coordinated fashion shall be defined by the 1.0-2.0-1 user. The boundaries surrounding signal controllers that operate in a coordinated fashion shall be altered by the 1.0-2.0-5 Adaptive Signal System according to configured parameters. The boundaries surrounding signal controllers that operate in a coordinated fashion shall be altered by the 1.0-2.0-5.0-3 system when commanded by the user. 4.0-1.0-4 The Adaptive Signal System shall support adaptive coordination on crossing routes. 12

7.0-2 The Adaptive Signal System shall provide a minimum of 5 overlaps. 2.1.2.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System shall not prevent protected/permissive left turn operation. The Adaptive Signal System shall not prevent the protected left turn to lead or lag the opposing through based 2.1.2.0-2 upon user- specified conditions. The Adaptive Signal System shall not prevent the controller from displaying flashing yellow arrow left turn or 7.0-11 right turn. 8.0-9 The Adaptive Signal System shall not inhibit negative vehicle and pedestrian timing. The Adaptive Signal System shall provide monitoring and control access at the following locations: County and 5.0-2 Regional TMC; Local controller cabinets; Remote locations via internet The Adaptive Signal System shall not prevent access to the local signal controller database, monitoring or 5.0-4 reporting functions by any installed signal management system. 3.0-1.0-3 The Adaptive Signal System shall send monitoring data to a minimum of 1 external system. In the event of a detector failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm to user-specified recipients. (This requirement may be fulfilled by sending the alarm to a designated list of recipients by a designated 13.1.0-3 means, or by using an external maintenance management system. In the event of communications failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm to user-specified recipients. (This requirement may be fulfilled by sending the alarm to a designated list of recipients by a 13.2-2 designated means, or by using an external maintenance management system. In the event of adaptive processor failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm to user-specified recipients. (This requirement may be fulfilled by sending the alarm to a designated list of recipients by a 13.3-2 designated means, or by using an external maintenance management system. 13.2-3 The Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm within 1 minute of detection of a failure. 13.1.0-4 In the event of a failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall log details of the failure in a permanent log. The Adaptive Signal System shall fully satisfy all requirements when connected with a minimum of 20 14.0-3 controllers. The Adaptive Signal System shall fully satisfy all requirements when connected with detectors compliant with 14.0-2 current FDOT specifications. 13

Verification Case ID: 6 Minimize installation cost for adaptive control strategies through the reuse of existing hardware and Verification Case Name: software Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below The Adaptive Signal System shall make maximum use of existing equipment and interface with existing controllers. It shall not be necessary to replace exiting controller or cabinet hardware and all additional 90-0 equipment shall be supplemental rather than substitutional. 14

Verification Case ID: 7 Maximize the efficiency of the corridor under emergency and public transit priority situations through Verification Case Name: minimization of transition periods and the selection of the appropriate post priority traffic movements Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below The Adaptive Signal System shall operate normally at non-preempted signal controllers when special functions 11.0-6 are engaged by a preemption event The Adaptive Signal System shall release user-specified signal controllers to local control when one signal in a 11.0-7 group is preempted. The Adaptive Signal System shall not prevent the local signal controller from operating in normally detected 11.0-8 limited-service actuated mode during preemption. 11.0-4 The Adaptive Signal System shall resume adaptive control of signal controllers when preemptions are released. The Adaptive Signal System shall maintain adaptive operation at non-preempted intersections during 11.0-2 emergency vehicle preemption. 12.0-4.0-1 Adaptive operations shall continue when there is an exclusive transit call. The Adaptive Signal System shall accept a transit priority call from: A signal controller/transit vehicle detector; When a pedestrian is called, the Adaptive Signal System shall accommodate pedestrian crossing times then 12.0-8 resume adaptive operation. 15

Verification Case ID: 8 Verification Case Name: The system needs to incorporate frequent pedestrian operation into routine adaptive operation Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below When a pedestrian is called, the Adaptive Signal System shall accommodate pedestrian crossing times then 8.0-0 resume adaptive operation. 16

Verification Case ID: 9 Operator training will be provided to enable effective and efficient operations and management of the Verification Case Name: system from the Regional TMC Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below The Adaptive Signal System shall continue adaptive operations of a group when one of its signal controllers has 12.0-1 a transit priority call. The Adaptive Signal System shall advance the start of a user-specified green in response to a transit priority 12.0-2 call. 12.0-3 The Adaptive Signal System shall delay the end of a green, in response to a priority call. 15.0-1.0-1 The vendor shall provide training on the operations of the adaptive system. 15.0-1.0-9 The vendor shall provide a minimum of 16 hours training to a minimum of 2 staff. 15.0-1 The vendor shall provide the following training. 15.0-1.0-2 The vendor shall provide training on troubleshooting the system. 15.0-1.0-3 The vendor shall provide training on preventive maintenance and repair of equipment. 15.0-1.0-4 The vendor shall provide training on system configuration. 15.0-1.0-5 The vendor shall provide training on administration of the system. 15.0-1.0-6 The vendor shall provide training on system calibration. The vendor's training delivery shall include: printed course materials and references, electronic copies of 15.0-1.0-7 presentations and references. 15.0-1.0-8 The vendor's training shall be delivered at (specify locations for training). 15.0-1.0-10 The vendor shall provide a minimum of 4 training sessions over 2 days 17

Verification Case ID: 10 Verification Case Name: Provide traffic and operational data Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below The Adaptive Signal System shall store results of all signal timing parameter calculations for a minimum of 30 6.0-4 days. The Adaptive Signal System shall store the following measured data in the form used as input to the adaptive algorithm for a minimum of 30 days: Volume, Occupancy, Queue length, Utilization, Arrivals in Green, Green 6.0-5 band efficiency The Adaptive Signal System shall store the following data in 1 minute increments: Volume, Occupancy, Queue 6.0-12 length The Adaptive Signal System shall report measures of current traffic conditions on which it bases signal state 18.0-1 alterations. The Adaptive Signal System shall report all intermediate calculated values that are affected by calibration 18.0-2 parameters. The Adaptive Signal System shall maintain a log of all signal state alterations directed by the Adaptive Signal 18.0-3 System. The Adaptive Signal System shall store results of all signal timing parameter calculations for a minimum of 30 6.0-4 days. The Adaptive Signal System shall store the following measured data in the form used as input to the adaptive algorithm for a minimum of 30 days: Volume, Occupancy, Queue length, utilization, Arrivals in green, Green 6.0-5 band efficiency The Adaptive Signal System shall export its systems log in the following formats: MS Excel, Text, CVS, Open 6.0-12 source SQL database The Adaptive Signal System shall archive all data automatically after a user-specified period not less than 30 6.0-6 days. The Adaptive Signal System shall provide data storage for a system size of 20 signal controllers, at a minimum. The data to be stored shall include the following: Controller state data, Reports, Log data, Security data, 6.0-7 Adaptive Signal System parameters, Detector status data 6.0-10 The Adaptive Signal System shall store data logs in a standard database. 3.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System shall support external interfaces that stated in the Concept of Operations 3.0-1.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System shall send operational data to a minimum of 1 external system. 3.0-1.0-5 The Adaptive Signal System shall send performance data to a minimum of 1 external system. 18

6.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System shall log the following events: 6.0-1.0-1 Time-stamped vehicle calls 6.0-1.0-2 Time-stamped pedestrian calls 6.0-1.0-3 Time-stamped emergency vehicle preemption calls 6.0-1.0-4 Time-stamped transit priority calls 6.0-1.0-6 Time-stamped start and end of each sequence 6.0-1.0-7 Time-stamped controller interval changes The Adaptive Signal System shall store the following measured data in the form used as input to the adaptive algorithm for a minimum of 30 days: Volume, Occupancy, Queue Length, Utilization, Arrivals in Green, 6.0-5 Green Band Efficiency The Adaptive Signal System shall calculate and report relative data quality including: The extent data is affected 6.0-8 by detector faults The Adaptive Signal System shall report comparisons of logged data when requested by the user: Day to day, Hour to hour, Hour of day to hour of day, Hour of week to hour of week, Day of week to day week, Day of year 6.0-9 to day of year The Adaptive Signal System shall report stored data in a form suitable to provide explanations of system 6.0-11 behavior to public and politicians and to troubleshoot the system. The Adaptive Signal System shall maintain a log of all signal state alterations directed by the Adaptive Signal 18.0-3 System. 18.0-3.0-4 The Adaptive Signal System shall maintain the records in this Adaptive Signal System log for a 30 day period. 18.0-3.0-5 The Adaptive Signal System shall archive the Adaptive Signal System log 18.0-3.0-1 The Adaptive Signal System log shall include all events directed by the external inputs. 18.0-3.0-2 The Adaptive Signal System log shall include all external output state changes. The Adaptive Signal System log shall include all actual parameter values that are subject to user-specified 18.0-3.0-3 values. 19

Verification Case ID: 11 Verification Case Name: Equipment failure management Verification Objective: To verify the requirements listed below 999.006 (project specific) The Adaptive Signal System shall maintain near-optimal adaptive operation in the event of a communications failure, and rely on historical data specific to the time-of-day and day-of-week in the event of detector failure. In the event of a detector failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm to user-specified recipients. (This requirement may be fulfilled by sending the alarm to a designated list of recipients by a designated 13.1.0-3 means, or by using an external maintenance management system. In the event of communications failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm to user-specified recipients. (This requirement may be fulfilled by sending the alarm to a designated list of recipients by a 13.2-2 designated means, or by using an external maintenance management system. In the event of adaptive processor failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm to user-specified recipients. (This requirement may be fulfilled by sending the alarm to a designated list of recipients by a 13.3-2 designated means, or by using an external maintenance management system. 13.2-3 The Adaptive Signal System shall issue an alarm within 1 minute of detection of a failure. 13.1.0-5 The permanent failure log shall be searchable, archivable and exportable. In the event of a communications failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall log details of the failure in a 13.2-4 permanent log. 13.2-5 The permanent failure log shall be searchable, archivable and exportable. The Adaptive Signal System shall operate non-adaptively when the number of failed detectors connected to a 2.1.1.0-2.0-2 signal controller exceeds a user-defined value. The Adaptive Signal System shall operate non-adaptively when the number of failed detectors in a group 2.1.1.0-2.0-3 exceeds a user-defined value. 2.1.1.0-2.0-4 The Adaptive Signal System shall operate non-adaptively when a user- defined communications link fails. During adaptive processor failure, the Adaptive Signal System shall provide all local detector inputs to the local 13.3-4 controller. 20