Creating a Knowledge Based Model using RapidPlan TM : The Henry Ford Experience

Similar documents
8/4/2016. Emerging Linac based SRS/SBRT Technologies with Modulated Arc Delivery. Disclosure. Introduction: Treatment delivery techniques

7/29/2017. Making Better IMRT Plans Using a New Direct Aperture Optimization Approach. Aim of Radiotherapy Research. Aim of Radiotherapy Research

Coverage based treatment planning to accommodate organ deformable motions and contouring uncertainties for prostate treatment. Huijun Xu, Ph.D.

Hugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France. Sunday 17 July 2016

Auto-Segmentation Using Deformable Image Registration. Disclosure. Objectives 8/4/2011

Monaco VMAT. The Next Generation in IMRT/VMAT Planning. Paulo Mathias Customer Support TPS Application

radiotherapy Andrew Godley, Ergun Ahunbay, Cheng Peng, and X. Allen Li NCAAPM Spring Meeting 2010 Madison, WI

GPU applications in Cancer Radiation Therapy at UCSD. Steve Jiang, UCSD Radiation Oncology Amit Majumdar, SDSC Dongju (DJ) Choi, SDSC

Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., UCSF. Pam Akazawa, CMD, UCSF. Cynthia Chuang, Ph.D., UCSF

The MSKCC Approach to IMRT. Outline

Dose Distributions. Purpose. Isodose distributions. To familiarize the resident with dose distributions and the factors that affect them

IMRT site-specific procedure: Prostate (CHHiP)

Basic Radiation Oncology Physics

CONTOURING ACCURACY. What Have We Learned? And Where Do We Go From Here? BEN NELMS, PH.D. AUGUST 15, 2016

Monaco Concepts and IMRT / VMAT Planning LTAMON0003 / 3.0

How would, or how does, the patient position (chin extended) affect your beam arrangement?

Dosimetric impact of the 160 MLC on head and neck IMRT treatments

iplan RT Image Advanced Contouring Workstation - Driving Physician Collaboration

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Implementation. Outline. Acknowledgement. History of VMAT. IMAT Basics of IMAT

VALIDATION OF DIR. Raj Varadhan, PhD, DABMP Minneapolis Radiation Oncology

Optimization in Brachytherapy. Gary A. Ezzell, Ph.D. Mayo Clinic Scottsdale

Current state of multi-criteria treatment planning

Photon beam dose distributions in 2D

Using a research real-time control interface to go beyond dynamic MLC tracking

Title: Toward Truly Optimal IMRT Dose Distribution: Inverse Planning with Voxel- Specific Penalty

Radiation therapy treatment plan optimization

Image Guidance and Beam Level Imaging in Digital Linacs

A Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System

8/3/2017. Contour Assessment for Quality Assurance and Data Mining. Objective. Outline. Tom Purdie, PhD, MCCPM

An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors

ROBUST OPTIMIZATION THE END OF PTV AND THE BEGINNING OF SMART DOSE CLOUD. Moe Siddiqui, April 08, 2017

CHAPTER 9 INFLUENCE OF SMOOTHING ALGORITHMS IN MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATIONS OF CYBERKNIFE TREATMENT PLANS: A LUNG PHANTOM STUDY

IMRT and VMAT Patient Specific QA Using 2D and 3D Detector Arrays

A hybrid framework for optimizing beam angles in radiation therapy planning

Tumor motion during liver SBRT

FAST, precise. qa software

A Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System

arxiv: v3 [physics.med-ph] 6 Dec 2011

Accounting for Large Geometric Changes During Radiotherapy. Disclosures. Current Generation DIR in RT 8/3/2016

ICARO Vienna April Implementing 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT in clinical practice: Recommendations of IAEA- TECDOC-1588

IMSURE QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE QA SOFTWARE

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

Two Effective Heuristics for Beam Angle Optimization in Radiation Therapy

Data. ModuLeaf Mini Multileaf Collimator Precision Beam Shaping for Advanced Radiotherapy

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

Radiotherapy Plan Competition TomoTherapy Planning System. Dmytro Synchuk. Ukrainian Center of TomoTherapy, Kirovograd, Ukraine

Analysis of RapidArc optimization strategies using objective function values and dose-volume histograms

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH. The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

Use of Deformable Image Registration in Radiation Therapy. Colin Sims, M.Sc. Accuray Incorporated 1

Interactive Treatment Planning in Cancer Radiotherapy

TRAJECTORY- BASED TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY FOR CRANIAL RADIOSURGERY

REAL-TIME ADAPTIVITY IN HEAD-AND-NECK AND LUNG CANCER RADIOTHERAPY IN A GPU ENVIRONMENT

Investigation of tilted dose kernels for portal dose prediction in a-si electronic portal imagers

The Dose Junction Issue Associated with Photon Beams for Large Volume Radiation Therapy and the Sensitivity to Set-up Error

State-of-the-Art IGRT

An Automatic Approach for Satisfying Dose-Volume Constraints in Linear Fluence Map Optimization for IMPT

Comparison of 3D and 2D gamma passing rate criteria for detection sensitivity to IMRT delivery errors

Dose Calculation and Optimization Algorithms: A Clinical Perspective

Secondary 3D Dose QA Fully Automated using MOSAIQ's IQ Engine. MOSAIQ User Meeting May Antwerp

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

Megan A. Wood, M.S. Under the direction of Larry DeWerd, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin Medical Radiation Research Center (UWMRRC)

Evaluation of 3D Gamma index calculation implemented in two commercial dosimetry systems

A Mimetic Algorithm for Simultaneous Multileaf Collimator Aperture Shape and Dosimetric Optimization in CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery

arxiv: v1 [physics.med-ph] 26 Oct 2009

Transitioning from pencil beam to Monte Carlo for electron dose calculations

Tomotherapy Physics. Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance. Emilie Soisson, MS

NEW METHOD OF COLLECTING OUTPUT FACTORS FOR COMMISSIONING LINEAR ACCELERATORS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS

3DVH : SUN NUCLEAR On The Accuracy Of The corporation Planned Dose Perturbation Algorithm Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools *Patent Pending

Delta 4 PT. True Volumetric Pre-treatment Verification. The difference is clear

1. Learn to incorporate QA for surface imaging

New Technology in Radiation Oncology. James E. Gaiser, Ph.D. DABR Physics and Computer Planning Charlotte, NC

8/2/2017. PerFRACTION from Sun Nuclear Automated Transit Dosimetry for In-Vivo QA

A fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: A Monte Carlo study

Evaluation of fluence-based dose delivery incorporating the spatial variation of dosimetric leaf gap (DLG)

TPS COMMISSIONING. Laurence Court University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center 4/3/2017 1

A Genetic Algorithm approach to Full Beam Configuration Inverse Planning in Coplanar Radiotherapy

Chapter 9 Field Shaping: Scanning Beam

arxiv: v1 [physics.med-ph] 22 Dec 2011

Photon Dose Algorithms and Physics Data Modeling in modern RTP

7/31/2011. Learning Objective. Video Positioning. 3D Surface Imaging by VisionRT

7/31/ D Cone-Beam CT: Developments and Applications. Disclosure. Outline. I have received research funding from NIH and Varian Medical System.

CARS 2008 Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Walk Through of CERR Capabilities. CERR: Introduction. Outline. Getting CERR: Control Panel. Documentation Support Community

enal++: a new and effective off-line correction protocol for rotational setup errors when using a robotic couch

Applied Optimization Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)

Qalitätssicherung an Multileafkollimatoren. Dr. Lutz Müller Würzburg jan 2004

Trajectory optimization for dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy

Dynalog data tool for IMRT plan verification

Beam Orientation Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy using Adaptive l 1 Minimization

Dosimetric Analysis Report

ADAPTIVE HYBRID SURGERY ANALYSIS

3DVH FAQs. What is PDP questions

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 16, NUMBER 6, 2015

An optimization framework for conformal radiation treatment planning

A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT

PET/CT multimodality imaging for radiotherapy planning in lung cancer The medical physicist point of view Isabelle Gardin Rouen CHB and Quant.I.

Computational modelling and analysis: IOP Medical Physics Group

Shared datasets for IMRT, beam angle optimization, and VMAT research

This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.

Application of polynomial chaos in proton therapy

Transcription:

DVH Estimates Creating a Knowledge Based Model using RapidPlan TM : The Henry Ford Experience Karen Chin Snyder, MS, DABR AAMD Region V Meeting October 4, 2014

Disclosures The Department of Radiation Oncology at Henry Ford Hospital has a research agreement with Varian Medical Systems. The speaker has received speakers honoraria from Varian Medical Systems

Varian Medical Systems Fair Balance Safety Statement INTENDED USE STATEMENT Varian Medical Systems linear accelerators are intended to provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated. SAFETY Radiation treatments may cause side effects that can vary depending on the part of the body being treated. The most frequent ones are typically temporary and may include, but are not limited to, irritation to the respiratory, digestive, urinary or reproductive systems, fatigue, nausea, skin irritation, and hair loss. In some patients, they can be severe. Treatment sessions may vary in complexity and time. Radiation treatment is not appropriate for all cancers. Medical Advice Disclaimer Varian as a medical device manufacturer cannot and does not recommend specific treatment approaches. Individual treatment results may vary. For more information, visit MyVarian.com. FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS ONLY

Why use Knowledge Based Models? Inverse Planning Variability Dependent on Planner s skill Balancing clinical objectives Iterative process that can be time consuming

RapidPlan TM Varian s Solution for Knowledge-Based Planning DVH Estimation Model Tumor Site Specific Trained from existing plans that have accepted OAR tradeoffs Uses principal component analysis for each OAR Different sub-volumes use different DVH estimation Automatic objective generation DVH estimates Automatic objectives The estimated DVH PC coefficient From the structure set of current plan

Basic Steps in Creating a KB Model Add Plans to the Model Train and Verify the Model Validate the Model

Basic Steps in Creating a KB Model Training Data Set Add Plans to the Model Train and Verify the Model Validation Data Set Validate the Model

Adding Plans to the Model Add Plans to the Model Geometry of Targets & OARs Plan Quality Treatment Technique Dose Prescription

Adding Plans to the Model Add Plans to the Model Geometry of Targets & OARs Plan Quality Treatment Technique Dose Prescription

Geometry of Targets and OARs - Size, Contouring and Physiology of OARs How do you treat at your clinic? Example: Rectum empty, bladder full and PTV expansions - change the overlap region between the OARs and Target - range of volumes of OARs in the model ie, full rectum as outlier

Geometry of Targets and OARs - Position of OARs relative to target Amount of Overlap Example: HN: amount of overlap with parotids Lung: RTOG 0915, max doses less than Rx dose. No overlap. - Differing volumes in the in-field region, all scenarios

Geometry of Targets and OARs - Position of OARs relative to target Distance of Target to OARs - Differing out-of-field volumes OAR s proximity to Spinal Cord

Geometry of Targets and OARs - Size, Contouring and Physiology of OARs Which OARs do you want the model to support? Example: Stomach and Brachial Plexus - Typical location of target compared to extreme locations - Need sufficient number of cases to train the model to give an estimate - OARs can be included without an estimation (fixed objective)

Adding Plans to the Model Add Plans to the Model Geometry of Targets & OARs Plan Quality Treatment Technique Dose Prescription

Treatment Technique - VMAT, IMRT, both - Gantry Angles - Non-coplanar, coplanar Beam geometry Important in Structure Volume Partitioning - Different out-of-field/in-field/ leaf-transmission and target overlap volumes Target overlap region In-field region Transversal view Leaf-transmission region Out-of-field region Image courtesy of Esa Kuusela, Varian Medical Systemes

Adding Plans to the Model Add Plans to the Model Geometry of Targets & OARs Plan Quality Treatment Technique Dose Prescription

Dose Prescription - Simultaneous Boost (SIB) - Attach multiple PTVs to the structure - Differing Dose Prescriptions - Scaling of doses - Not ideal for different fractionation schemes S.H. Benedict, K.M. Yenice, D. Followill, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101 Med Phys, 37 (2010), pp. 4078 4101

Adding Plans to the Model Add Plans to the Model Geometry of Targets & OARs Plan Quality Treatment Technique Dose Prescription

Plan Quality Physician Preferred Dose Distributions PTV coverage - NTO used, Shoulder of DVH, allowable hot spot OAR Sparing Example: Rib sparing in HFHS Lung SBRT Model

How Many Plans to Include in the Model Complexity of model, and what you want it to include - Prostate ~40, Prostate w/ LN ~ 70, HN SIB ~ 116, SBRT Lung = 105 Overlap of Data points - Basically the same plan/location - Can always add new interesting cases to the model, will need to re-validate

Basic Steps in Creating a KB Model Add Plans to the Model Train and Verify the Model Validate the Model

Train and Verify the Model Train the Model Re-Extract Identify Outliers Add Similar Plans Re-plan Re-contour Dosimetric Geometric Remove Plan Evaluate if Plan is Appropriate Neither?

DVH Tool Validation Tools - OAR of each training patient and corresponding estimate Estimate

Training Log - Outlier Summary and Metrics - Statistics Summary Validation Tools

Validation Tools Regression Plot - DVH PC1 vs Geometric Distribution PC1 2 Std Devs Model Fit

Training log Identifying Geometric Outliers - Cook s Distance (CD) : indicates influential point, alerts you when >4 - Modified Z score (mz) 4 : difference between individual and mean Regression Plot: DVH PC1 vs Geometric Distribution PC1 Contouring issues: partially contoured structure

Training log Identifying Dosimetric Outliers - Studentized Residual (SR) : measures difference between original and estimated data, threshold of >3 will alert - Areal difference of estimate (da) difference in area between estimated and actual DVH Residual Plot: DVH PC vs Estimated DVH PC1 Original Plan is Higher than Estimate Example: Atypical tradeoff between OARs Original Plan is lower than Estimate

Training log Neither? - Cook s Distance (CD) : indicates influential point - Studentized Residual (SR) : measures difference between original and estimated data Regression Plot: DVH PC1 vs Geometric Distribution PC1 Need more data points to fill in regression plot

Goodness- of-fit Statistics Overfitting - Chi square: range 0-1, want to be closer to 1 - Coefficient of determination: close to 1

Basic Steps in Creating a KB Model Add Plans to the Model Train and Verify the Model Validate the Model

Validate the Model The Model Patient Plan Model Estimate Final Dose Calc Estimated Plan Validate DVH Estimation Validate Automatic Priorities Validate the Model

Patient Plan vs Estimate For a particular patient geometry, is your model able to give you a good estimate? Validate the DVH Estimation - Do you need to go back and evaluate your training set/re-train model?

Model Estimate vs Estimated Plan After optimization and final calculation Validate the Objectives - Are the estimated priorities able to achieve the estimated DVH?

Patient Plan vs Estimated Plan How well is your model performing? Are you obtaining clinically acceptable plans? Validate the Overall Model - Use a good range of geometries - Are there exceptions/limitations after validation?

Limitations in our Model Issue in cases where the PTV abuts the heart Max heart dose is 34Gy, 95% of PTV to receive 48Gy Needs additional user modification in order to meet the OAR max dose constraint Plan may not meet other planning criteria, GI, 99% PTV coverage, max dose from PTV+2cm Not supported in the current model Fixed PTV objectives Not many patient cases

Published Models - Varian Provided Models Publication and Sharing - Intended usage and applicability to your clinic - You can modify Varian Models - Need to be independently validated by you before application to clinic - Easily share models http://stairwaytoeducation.com/welcome/wpcontent/uploads/2013/02/sharing_ideas.jpg

Using a RapidPlan Model Integrated part of the Photon Optimizer - Choose the Model - Match OARs to Model Structure - Match PTV to PTV, and set Target Dose - Generate Estimates and Objectives and optimize. Similar to applying a fixed objective template, but with the knowledge of patient geometry and experience of previous planners

Knowledge based models Conclusion - Share knowledge with DVH estimation and automatic objective creation - 3 basic steps in creating your own model - You can create your own models or modify existing models How KB Models can help you - Quality Control of IMRT plans - Standardization - Automation - Inter-institutional sharing www.mindmadpinspiration.com

Thank You The KB Team at HF: Indrin Chetty, PhD Ajlouni Munther, MD Salim Siddiqui, MD, PhD Jinkoo Kim, PhD Anne Reding, CMD Corey Fraser, CMD Varian: Helen Phillips, Esa Kuusela