LIDAR MAPPING FACT SHEET

Similar documents
N.J.P.L.S. An Introduction to LiDAR Concepts and Applications

Technical Considerations and Best Practices in Imagery and LiDAR Project Procurement

An Introduction to Lidar & Forestry May 2013

Aerial and Mobile LiDAR Data Fusion

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)

Airborne LiDAR Data Acquisition for Forestry Applications. Mischa Hey WSI (Corvallis, OR)

Terrain Modeling and Mapping for Telecom Network Installation Using Scanning Technology. Maziana Muhamad

Hamilton County Enhances GIS Base Mapping with 1-foot Contours

ALS40 Airborne Laser Scanner

CLASSIFICATION OF NONPHOTOGRAPHIC REMOTE SENSORS

Merging LiDAR Data with Softcopy Photogrammetry Data

Terrestrial GPS setup Fundamentals of Airborne LiDAR Systems, Collection and Calibration. JAMIE YOUNG Senior Manager LiDAR Solutions

COMPUTING SOLAR ENERGY POTENTIAL OF URBAN AREAS USING AIRBORNE LIDAR AND ORTHOIMAGERY

Overview. 1. Aerial LiDAR in Wisconsin (20 minutes) 2. Demonstration of data in CAD (30 minutes) 3. High Density LiDAR (20 minutes)

About LIDAR Data. What Are LIDAR Data? How LIDAR Data Are Collected

LIDAR and Terrain Models: In 3D!

Municipal Projects in Cambridge Using a LiDAR Dataset. NEURISA Day 2012 Sturbridge, MA

LiDAR Applications in Surveying and Engineering

Airborne Laser Survey Systems: Technology and Applications

Workshops funded by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund

UAV Surveying II. Precision. Accuracy. Reliability

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Radiohead House of Cards

LIDAR an Introduction and Overview

2010 LiDAR Project. GIS User Group Meeting June 30, 2010

Reality Check: Processing LiDAR Data. A story of data, more data and some more data

APPENDIX E2. Vernal Pool Watershed Mapping

UTILIZACIÓN DE DATOS LIDAR Y SU INTEGRACIÓN CON SISTEMAS DE INFORMACIÓN GEOGRÁFICA

Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR

LiDAR data overview. Dr. Keiko Saito Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)

Integrated Multi-Source LiDAR and Imagery

Quinnipiac Post Flight Aerial Acquisition Report

A Method to Create a Single Photon LiDAR based Hydro-flattened DEM

Course Outline (1) #6 Data Acquisition for Built Environment. Fumio YAMAZAKI

LiDAR & Orthophoto Data Report

UAS based laser scanning for forest inventory and precision farming

Introduction Photogrammetry Photos light Gramma drawing Metron measure Basic Definition The art and science of obtaining reliable measurements by mean

Mayden VP of Business Development Surdex Corporation

Mobile LiDAR for Ground Applications. Spar 2006, March Paul Mrstik, Terrapoint Canada Inc. Craig Glennie, Terrapoint USA LLC

Lidar Sensors, Today & Tomorrow. Christian Sevcik RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems

UAV Flight Operations for Mapping. Precision. Accuracy. Reliability

LiDAR-Maps. and More for. Engineers. TechTime New Mapping Tools for Transportation Engineering. Airborne LiDAR. Digital Cameras

EXTRACTING SURFACE FEATURES OF THE NUECES RIVER DELTA USING LIDAR POINTS INTRODUCTION

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) - National Geospatial Program (NGP) and the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS)

Existing Elevation Data Sets. Quality Level 2 (QL2) Lidar Data Sets. Better Land Characterization More Accurate Results!

Learning Objectives LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING. Sensing. Blacksburg, VA July 24 th 30 th, 2010 LiDAR: Mapping the world in 3-D Page 1

QUALITY CONTROL METHOD FOR FILTERING IN AERIAL LIDAR SURVEY

VALIDATION OF A NEW 30 METER GROUND SAMPLED GLOBAL DEM USING ICESAT LIDARA ELEVATION REFERENCE DATA

EVOLUTION OF POINT CLOUD

Project Report Nooksack South Fork Lummi Indian Nation. Report Presented to:

New Requirements for the Relief in the Topographic Databases of the Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya

Data Acquisition; Maintenance, and Dissemination

AIRBORNE GEIGER MODE LIDAR - LATEST ADVANCEMENTS IN REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS RANDY RHOADS

Terrestrial Laser Scanning: Applications in Civil Engineering Pauline Miller

The Use of UAV s for Gathering Spatial Information. James Van Rens CEO MAPPS Winter Conference January, 2015

ENY-C2005 Geoinformation in Environmental Modeling Lecture 4b: Laser scanning

Adrian Cosmin Ghimbaşan 1 Cornel Cristian Tereşneu 1 Iosif Vorovencii 1

Cooperating Technical Partners Information Exchange. LIDAR QA/QC and Extracting Building Footprints

LIDAR 101 & 2014 MO/AR LIDAR PARTNERS PROJECT. NEMO GIS Workshop

SPAR, ELMF 2013, Amsterdam. Laser Scanning on the UK Highways Agency Network. Hamish Grierson Blom Uk

Volumetric Calculations. Sample Data

Lidar Technical Report

Applications of LiDAR in seismic acquisition and processing Mark Wagaman and Ron Sfara, Veritas DGC

Lidar Standards. Chatham County, Georgia. Jason Lee, Noel Perkins and Vincent Grevemberg

[Youn *, 5(11): November 2018] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor

LiDAR QA/QC - Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment report -

Summary of Research and Development Efforts Necessary for Assuring Geometric Quality of Lidar Data

Automated Feature Extraction from Aerial Imagery for Forestry Projects

Photo based Terrain Data Acquisition & 3D Modeling

Trends in Digital Aerial Acquisition Systems

Evaluation of Multi-Return LIDAR for Forestry Applications

LiDAR Engineering and Design Applications. Sample Data

CREATING CUSTOMIZED SPATIAL MODELS WITH POINT CLOUDS USING SPATIAL MODELER OPERATORS TO PROCESS POINT CLOUDS IN IMAGINE 2014

UAV s in Surveying: Integration/processes/deliverables A-Z. 3Dsurvey.si

Assimilation of Break line and LiDAR Data within ESRI s Terrain Data Structure (TDS) for creating a Multi-Resolution Terrain Model

2-4 April 2019 Taets Art and Event Park, Amsterdam CLICK TO KNOW MORE

Corridor Survey of Both Existing and New to be Built Pipelines on Land Using LiDAR Scanning

High resolution survey and orthophoto project of the Dosso-Gaya region in the Republic of Niger. by Tim Leary, Woolpert Inc.

LIDAR Workshop IPSRS Commission 1

The Applanix Approach to GPS/INS Integration

Should Contours Be Generated from Lidar Data, and Are Breaklines Required? Lidar data provides the most

QUANTIFICATION OF AVAILABLE SOLAR IRRADIATION ON ROOFTOPS USING ORTHOPHOTOGRAPH AND LIDAR DATA

Automated Extraction of Buildings from Aerial LiDAR Point Cloud and Digital Imaging Datasets for 3D Cadastre - Preliminary Results

Leica ALS70. Airborne Laser Scanners Performance for diverse Applications

LiDAR data pre-processing for Ghanaian forests biomass estimation. Arbonaut, REDD+ Unit, Joensuu, Finland

A COMPARISON OF LIDAR TERRAIN DATA WITH AUTOCORRELATED DSM EXTRACTED FROM DIGITALLY ACQUIRED HIGH OVERLAP PHOTOGRAPHY BACKGROUND

CO-REGISTERING AND NORMALIZING STEREO-BASED ELEVATION DATA TO SUPPORT BUILDING DETECTION IN VHR IMAGES

Data Acquisition Through the Geospatial Products and Services Contract (GPSC)

STARTING WITH DRONES. Data Collection and Remote Sensing with UAVs, etc. Dr. Bill Hazelton LS

Connecticut Association of Assessing Officers CT Statewide GIS Data Acquisition & Services. June 22, :00 am

Using ArcGIS Server Data to Assist in Planimetric Update Process. Jim Stout - IMAGIS Rick Hammond Woolpert

Chapters 1 9: Overview

Overview of the Trimble TX5 Laser Scanner

Surveying like never before

Contents of Lecture. Surface (Terrain) Data Models. Terrain Surface Representation. Sampling in Surface Model DEM

2. POINT CLOUD DATA PROCESSING

Using LiDAR (Light Distancing And Ranging) data to more accurately describe avalanche terrain

Remote Sensing Sensor Integration

CE 59700: LASER SCANNING

Using Mobile LiDAR To Efficiently Collect Roadway Asset and Condition Data. Pierre-Paul Grondin, B.Sc. Surveying

Leica Systems Overview

Transcription:

1. LIDAR THEORY What is lidar? Lidar is an acronym for light detection and ranging. In the mapping industry, this term is used to describe an airborne laser profiling system that produces location and elevation data to define the surface of the earth and the heights of above-ground features. Mounted on either a helicopter or a fixed-wing aircraft, lidar systems use the near-infrared portion of the electro-magnetic light spectrum (1064 nm) to collect data night or day, in shadow, and beneath clouds. Using semi-automated techniques the raw lidar data is processed to generate a number of useful end products, including an accurate bare-earth terrain model in which trees, vegetation, and manmade structures have been edited out. Lidar systems collect height and elevation data using light from the near-infrared wavelength. How does it work? Lidar systems vary by manufacturer, but all use the following instrumentation: a laser source and detector; a scanning mechanism and controller; airborne GPS and IMU equipment; a high-accuracy, high-resolution clock for timing laser emissions, reflections, GPS/IMU, and scan-angle measurements; high performance computers; and high capacity data recorders. With these components, lidar data collection is possible: A pulse of laser light is emitted and the precise time is recorded The reflection of that pulse from the surface is detected and the precise time is recorded Using the constant speed of light, the time difference between the emission and the reflection can be converted into a slant range distance (line-of-sight distance) With the very accurate position and orientation of the sensor provided by the airborne GPS and inertial measurement unit (IMU) data, the XYZ coordinate of the reflective surface can be calculated What are the benefits of lidar? Lidar offers many advantages over traditional photogrammetric methods for collecting elevation data. These include high vertical accuracy, fast data collection and processing, robust data sets with many possible products, and the ability to collect data in a wide range of conditions. 2. TECHNICAL OVERVIEW System calibration. System calibration must occur for each mission. This involves flying a specific pattern of flight lines to highlight systematic offsets to which adjustments are applied during the processing. Ground control also is used to determine any vertical bias that may occur from flight to flight. Collection Parameters. Lidar missions are tailored to meet individual project specifications, based on intended data use. Important collection parameters include: Point spacing and point density. Also referred to as average or nominal post spacing, point spacing is a one-dimensional measurement of points along a line. Point density refers to the number of points in a given area. The greater the number of points, the denser the dataset. Pulse rate. The pulse rate is the speed by which the lidar sensor emits laser pulses. Lidar systems can have fixed or variable pulse rates. Higher pulse rates are associated with denser data sets. The chosen pulse rate for a specific mission will impact the maximum operational altitude (higher pulse rates require lower altitudes). Field of view. The field of view (FOV) refers to a sensor s scan angle. The FOV can be fixed or variable and impacts the flying altitude and pulse rate (wider scan angles require higher altitudes and lower pulse rates). For areas containing intense shadows (mountainous regions, for instance) a narrow FOV is preferable to keep the beam nearly perpendicular to the earth s surface. Aircraft altitude. The altitude (and speed) of the aircraft during lidar missions depends on the desired point spacing/point density, pulse rate, and field of view. Typically, missions flown at high altitudes and fast speeds produce less dense datasets. Terrain features, aircraft safety, and air traffic control regulations must also be considered when choosing an altitude for a project. Turning Spatial Data into Knowledge 1

Multiple Return Lidar. Multiple return lidar yields both range and intensity data from a single pass: Range data measures the distance from the sensor to the object struck. Intensity data measures the return signal strength, based on the way the object struck reflects the lidar energy. Intensity data is consistent among similar objects, making it possible to map the information in the form of a matrix, giving the appearance of a gray-scale image. In multiple return lidar systems, the first pulse measures the range to the first object encountered. The last pulse measures the range to the last object. By acquiring first- and last-pulse data simultaneously, it is possible to measure both tree heights and the topography of the ground. LIDAR HEIGHT AND COVER DETERMINATION z x POSITION OF INSTRUMENT GPS + INS Controlled Multiple Return Intensity of Return 1st Return 2nd Return 3rd Return y In this example, the first return measurement is a range value of the tree top; the last return is the ground. Lidar systems can return up to four range values and three intensity values for ground and above-ground elevation data from a single flight. Multiple return lidar enables dense datasets even in treed areas. Note how ground points from first return lidar (left) are limited to the roadway, parking lot, and intermittent areas between trees. The number of ground points in the treed areas increases greatly when first and last returns are combined (right). Lidar Processing for DEM production. Automated and manual procedures are used to process lidar data and associated GPS/IMU data to generate a digital elevation model (DEM). While auto-filtering removes a majority of data artifacts, manual editing is required to achieve an accurate bare-earth surface model, where vegetation, structures, and other above-ground features have been removed. Quality control of the lidar data processing often involves a peer review before final data acceptance. Turning Spatial Data into Knowledge 2

Contours and Lidargrammetry. Topographic contours are extracted automatically from the bare-earth DEM then manually edited to correct any errors. For this process, the use of breaklines lines that define breaks in the topography, such as cliffs, ditches, and rivers is highly recommended as it provides a more realistic representation of the terrain. Breaklines can be extracted by stereo compilation of aerial photography, but since this mandates a separate mission for imagery acquisition, the method can be cost prohibitive unless the imagery is required for other purposes. To eliminate the need for imagery acquisition, a method known as lidargrammetry may be employed. Lidargrammetry enables breaklines to be extracted from stereoscopic pairs of lidar intensity imagery. The intensity data from the lidar collect is projected onto the lidar-derived DEM from two different viewing angles to artificially create two separate images that form a stereo pair. Contours extracted without breaklines may be statistically accurate and meet most nationally recognized standards, but they appear messy and are difficult to interpret (right). With added breaklines, the contours follow the terrain more realistically (left); as a result, interpreting the contours is much more intuitive as terrain features (rivers, roads, etc.) become instantly recognizable. 3. LIDAR MYTHS Though airborne lidar mapping has been mainstream for nearly a decade, many myths persist: Myth 1: More points are always better. Point spacing (the distance between points) and point density (the coverage of points within a given area) are critical considerations for any lidar mapping project. Factors that determine optimum point spacing include desired vertical accuracy, terrain, land cover, and the ultimate data application. For many applications, a lower point density is sufficient and can save time and costs by reducing acquisition time and data processing as well as potential data storage and handling difficulties. Myth 2: Lidar can see through foliage. Lidar does not see through foliage. However, some lidar points do reach the ground through openings in the tree canopy. As the lidar point density increases, so does the probability of obtaining returns from the ground. In fact, lidar systems generate a significantly greater number of ground elevation points in vegetated areas, compared to what typically is achieved through photogrammetric compilation methods at comparable mapping scales. Among other problems, stereo compilation technicians are forced to contend with shadows and radial distortions (e.g. leaning buildings) which can obscure the technician s view of the ground when using traditional aerial photography. Myth 3: Lidar replaces traditional mapping techniques. Lidar is a complement to, not a replacement for, traditional aerial mapping methodologies. For most uses, lidar intensity imagery is not a viable replacement for aerial photography, nor does lidar data provide an option for planimetric mapping. Myth 4: Lidar is an all-weather system. The target must reflect the near infrared portion of the electromagnetic light spectrum for lidar to work. Data collection can occur beneath the clouds and in some haze, but because water absorbs most near infrared light, it will not operate correctly during fog, rain, or snow. Turning Spatial Data into Knowledge 3

4. LIDAR PRODUCTS Many data products are possible from a single lidar mission: Digital surface models. Lidar provides a fast and cost-effective method for producing digital elevation models (DEMs) accurate for use in orthophoto rectification. Two types are available: reflective-surface DEMs from first returns for elevation of above ground features and bare-earth DEMs from all range and intensity values for accurate measurement of the earth s surface. Contours. Supplemented with breaklines, lidar-derived contours can be generated at 1' to 5' intervals, meeting National Map Accuracy Standards in accordance with FEMA lidar mapping specifications. Land-use/land-cover. Lidar data may be used to generate preliminary land-cover classification depicting open, scrub/shrub, urban, and forested classifications, useful for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling in support of floodplain mapping. Intensity images. Similar in appearance to low-resolution photographs, georeferenced lidar intensity images can be used to extract planimetric features and serve as ancillary input for lidar data processing. Intensity images also are used to check the horizontal accuracy of the lidar data and other criteria. Point cloud. Once all the elevation points are computed from each of the individual returns, the resulting dataset consists of a cloud of points that represent elevations of both ground and above-ground features. 5. LIDAR APPLICATIONS Lidar data serves a wide range of applications: Base mapping. Lidar DEMs are accurate for orthorectification as well as for contour generation with supplemented 3D breaklines. Floodplain mapping. Lidar data supports flood hazard analyses and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. Natural resources management. Lidar data is used to calculate tree-stand heights, biomass, and timber volumes and is useful in establishing volume calculations for mineral extraction. Transportation and utility corridor mapping. Lidar data can supplement traditional ground and aerial surveys in the planning and design of new transportation and utility corridors. Urban modeling. 3D models from bare-earth and reflective-surface lidar data can be used in analysis and visualization of urban planning, line-of-sight studies, and viewshed analysis, etc. POINT SPACING VERTICAL ACCURACY (RMSE) CONTOUR INTERVAL Base Mapping APPLICATION SUPPORTED Floodplain Natural Transportation Mapping Resources / Utility Urban Modeling 1 m 0.09 m 1' 2 m 0.20 m 2' 3 m 0.30 m 3' 4 m 0.40 m 4' 5 m 0.51 m 5' Note: this table is for example only. Other scenarios are possible and would be defined on a case-by-case basis depending on specific project requirements. 6. LIDAR PROCUREMENT Industry Standards. Most local and state governments use lidar specifications developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). See http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/lidar_4b.shtm. Published in 2000, the Lidar Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping requires a DEM point spacing of 5 m or less and a vertical accuracy of 30 cm. Adherence to the standards are an important aspect of becoming a FEMA Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP), the advantages of which include potential funding benefits. The American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) is another common reference; their Guidelines for Vertical Accuracy Reporting for Lidar Data was produced in 2004 and incorporates relevant sections of the National Digital Elevation Program s Guidelines for Digital Elevation Data. Turning Spatial Data into Knowledge 4

Project Considerations. Questions to consider when designing projects include: What is the ideal point spacing and point density for the given application(s)? How will the flight design account for the different types of terrain or changes in the elevation? What deliverables should be requested (bare-earth DEM, point cloud data, reflective surface DEM, intensity images, ground survey and acquisition reports, lidar-derived land cover)? What methodology is desired for removing vegetation and above-ground features to generate a bareearth DEM (fully- or partially-automated removal)? What vertical accuracy is needed for the given application(s)? What is the preference between data licensing and data ownership? Costs. Lidar project costs vary based on project specifications. A 500 sq mi project area with 3 m point spacing over flat to moderate terrain may cost $200-300 per sq mi. The same type of project with a 1 m point spacing over an area of 100-500 sq mi may cost $350-450 per sq mi. These rough estimates assume a contiguous, roughly rectangular project block. The location, type of terrain, vegetation cover, and time of year can dramatically affect pricing. Turning Spatial Data into Knowledge 5