Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the GUI and the Bottom-up-Method

Similar documents
Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the Static Structural Module of. Ansys Workbench 14.0

Module 1.2: Moment of a 1D Cantilever Beam

Structural static analysis - Analyzing 2D frame

Structural static analysis - Analyzing 2D frame

NonLinear Materials AH-ALBERTA Web:

Two Dimensional Truss

Structural modal analysis - 2D frame

Course in ANSYS. Example0153. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

NonLinear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Aufgabe 1: Dreipunktbiegung mit ANSYS Workbench

ANSYS 5.6 Tutorials Lecture # 2 - Static Structural Analysis

Exercise 1: 3-Pt Bending using ANSYS Workbench

Example Cantilever beam

Example Plate with a hole

Module 1.5: Moment Loading of a 2D Cantilever Beam

Institute of Mechatronics and Information Systems

Module 1.7: Point Loading of a 3D Cantilever Beam

Chapter 2. Structural Tutorial

file://c:\documents and Settings\sala\Configuración local\temp\~hha54f.htm

Module 3: Buckling of 1D Simply Supported Beam

Structural modal analysis - 2D frame

Module 1.6: Distributed Loading of a 2D Cantilever Beam

Ansys Lab Frame Analysis

Course in ANSYS. Example Truss 2D. Example0150

Course in ANSYS. Example0505. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

Course in ANSYS. Example0303. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

TWO-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM OF THE THEORY OF ELASTICITY. INVESTIGATION OF STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTORS.

Bell Crank. Problem: Joseph Shigley and Charles Mischke. Mechanical Engineering Design 5th ed (New York: McGraw Hill, May 2002) page 87.

Essay 5 Tutorial for a Three-Dimensional Heat Conduction Problem Using ANSYS

Course in ANSYS. Example0154. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

Course in ANSYS. Example0410. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

Exercise 2: Mesh Resolution, Element Shapes, Basis Functions & Convergence Analyses

ANSYS. Geometry. Material Properties. E=2.8E7 psi v=0.3. ansys.fem.ir Written By:Mehdi Heydarzadeh Page 1

Course in ANSYS. Example0601. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

Lecture # 5 Modal or Dynamic Analysis of an Airplane Wing

Statically Indeterminate Beam

6. Results Combination in Hexagonal Shell

Course in ANSYS. Example0500. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

Latch Spring. Problem:

Multi-Step Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Deep Beam With Web Opening

ANSYS Tutorials. Table of Contents. Grady Lemoine

Course in ANSYS. Example0152. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

Course in ANSYS. Example0504. ANSYS Computational Mechanics, AAU, Esbjerg

Elastic Analysis of a Deep Beam with Web Opening

Release 10. Kent L. Lawrence. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Texas at Arlington SDC PUBLICATIONS

Institute of Mechatronics and Information Systems

ANSYS Tutorial Release 11.0

3. Check by Eurocode 3 a Steel Truss

Analysis Steps 1. Start Abaqus and choose to create a new model database

Coupled Structural/Thermal Analysis

5. Shell Reinforcement According To Eurocode 2

CHAPTER 8 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

IJMH - International Journal of Management and Humanities ISSN:

Modelling and Analysis Lab (FEA)

Buckling Analysis of a Thin Plate

ECE421: Electronics for Instrumentation

1.992, 2.993, 3.04, 10.94, , Introduction to Modeling and Simulation Prof. F.-J. Ulm Spring FE Modeling Example Using ADINA

Dhanalakshmi College Of Engineering

Chapter 3. Thermal Tutorial

ENGINEERING TRIPOS PART IIA FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Chapter 3 Analysis of Original Steel Post

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS LABORATORY MANUAL ANSYS. Course Instructor: Dr. R.Ganesan

CHAPTER 4. Numerical Models. descriptions of the boundary conditions, element types, validation, and the force

MECH 3130: Mechanics of Materials. Fall Laboratory Manual. Volume II

ANSYS EXERCISE ANSYS 5.6 Temperature Distribution in a Turbine Blade with Cooling Channels

Figure E3-1 A plane struss structure under applied loading. Start MARC Designer. From the main menu, select STATIC STRESS ANALYSIS.

Appendix B: Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

Module 1.7W: Point Loading of a 3D Cantilever Beam

Melting Using Element Death

Transient Thermal Conduction Example

Learning Module 8 Shape Optimization

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING. Part-1

Abaqus/CAE Axisymmetric Tutorial (Version 2016)

Statically Indeterminate Beam

ANSYS Tutorial Version 6

CE366/ME380 Finite Elements in Applied Mechanics I Fall 2007

Installation Guide. Beginners guide to structural analysis

Prescribed Deformations

Torsional-lateral buckling large displacement analysis with a simple beam using Abaqus 6.10

Reinforced concrete beam under static load: simulation of an experimental test

ME 442. Marc/Mentat-2011 Tutorial-1

Linear Static Analysis of a Plate with Hole

Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

LAB MANUAL. Dharmapuri ME6711-SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS. Regulation : Branch : B.E. Mechanical Engineering

Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Settlement Analysis of a Strip Footing Linear Static Analysis (Benchmark Example)

CE Advanced Structural Analysis. Lab 4 SAP2000 Plane Elasticity

Abaqus CAE Tutorial 6: Contact Problem

Buckling of Euler Column

Abaqus CAE Tutorial 1: 2D Plane Truss

General modeling guidelines

Finite Element Method using Pro/ENGINEER and ANSYS

THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM OF THE THEORY OF ELASTICITY STRESS IN A THICK-WALLED PRESSURE VESSEL

Introduction to MSC.Patran

ME Optimization of a Frame

Revised Sheet Metal Simulation, J.E. Akin, Rice University

Linear Buckling Analysis of a Plate

Linear Bifurcation Buckling Analysis of Thin Plate

Stiffened Plate With Pressure Loading

Transcription:

Exercise 1 3-Point Bending Using the GUI and the Bottom-up-Method Contents Learn how to... 1 Given... 2 Questions... 2 Taking advantage of symmetries... 2 A. Preprocessor (Setting up the Model)... 3 A.1 Build the Geometry by Means of the Bottom-up Method... 3 A.1.1 Create Keypoints... 3 A.1.2 Create Lines via Connecting the Keypoints... 3 A.1.3 Create Area via Connecting the Lines... 3 A.1.4 Visualization of the created elements... 3 A.2 Material Properties... 4 A.2.1 Define Material Properties... 4 A.3 Meshing... 5 A.3.1 Assign the Finite Element Type... 5 A.3.2 Define Real Constants... 7 A.3.3 Meshing... 8 A.4 Applying Loads and Boundary Conditions... 9 A.4.1 Boundary Conditions... 9 A.4.2 Applying the Loads... 9 B. Solving... 10 B.1 Basic Settings: Analysis Type... 10 B.2 Start solving... 11 C. Postprocessor... 11 C.1 Contour Plot of Deformed Shape... 11 C.2 Contour Plot: X-Component of Total Strain... 14 C.3 Contour Plot X-Component of Stress... 14 C.4 Contour Plot: Von-Mises Equivalent Stress... 15 Answering the Questions:... 15 Learn how to use the ANSYS GUI (graphical user interface) build a model using the bottom up method take advantage of symmetries perform a full analysis consisting of pre-processing, solution and post-processing Page 1 of 15

Given Beam under 3-point bending with a centric applied force F as shown in Fig. 1 w h F t L Fig. 1: Beam under 3-point bending. Relevant geometrical and material data for our problem are given in Table 1: F L h t E ν σyield = 500,000 N = 2,000 mm = 60 mm = 20 mm = 210,000 N/mm 2 = 0.3 = 235 N/mm 2 Applied force Length of the beam Height of the beam cross section Thickness of the beam cross section Young s modulus Poisson s ration Allowable stress: yield stress of steel Table 1: Geometry and material data. Questions Due to this classic 2-dimensional mechanical problem we can state two questions: 1. Will the beam break and were would it start breaking? 2. If not, what would be the maximum deflection w? Taking advantage of symmetries Can we take advantage of symmetries? Please, draw a simplified beam model which takes advantage of symmetry! Fig. 2: Space for drawing of simplified beam model taking advantage of symmetry. Page 2 of 15

A. Preprocessor (Setting up the Model) A.1 Build the Geometry by Means of the Bottom-up Method The bottom-up method generates the geometry of the system going from key points (0D) to lines (1D) and areas (2D) up to volumes (3D). y 1 keypoints lines area 2 4 x Fig. 3: 2D geometry of the beam 3 A.1.1 Create Keypoints We need to create four keypoints: Main Menu Preprocessor Modeling Create Keypoints In Active CS: Fig. 4: Dialog box for the creation of keypoints Enter the corresponding coordinates of each of the four necessary keypoints and confirm each by pressing [Apply]. After you have entered all four keypoints, press [OK] to close the dialog box. A.1.2 Create Lines via Connecting the Keypoints Main Menu Preprocessor Modeling Create Lines Straight Line Connect the keypoints by clicking with the mouse pointer on the first and then on the second keypoint of each line. After creating the four lines confirm with [OK]. A.1.3 Create Area via Connecting the Lines Main Menu Preprocessor Modeling Create Areas Arbitrary By Lines Pick the four lines by the mouse pointer and then confirm with [OK]. A.1.4 Visualization of the created elements To plot the numeric IDs associated with each created item, select... Utility Menu PlotCtrls which brings up the following dialog box Page 3 of 15

Fig. 5: Dialog box for plot controls, numbering and switch on the numbering of required items (e.g. Keypoints, Areas). Then choose... Utility Menu Plot... to visualize the created items. A.2 Material Properties A.2.1 Define Material Properties Materials define the mechanical behavior of the FE model. We will use a simple linearelastic, isotropic material model. Main Menu Preprocessor Material Props Material Models Fig. 6: Define the material properties. Page 4 of 15

Choose the simplest available material model by selecting (double click) from the tree of available models: Structural Linear Elastic Isotropic (see Fig. 14) Now a dialog box appears (Fig. 7), asking you for certain material parameters: Fig. 7: Define material properties for material model number 1 Enter the material properties Young s modulus (EX) and Poisson s ratio (PRXY). Confirm with [OK] and close the Material Models window (Fig. 6). A.3 Meshing A.3.1 Assign the Finite Element Type Before we can create a mesh for our model, we need to choose which type of finite element we will want to use for our mesh. Preprocessor Element Type Add/Edit/Delete Fig. 8: Empty list of defined element types. Page 5 of 15

Press the button [Add] and select Structural Mass Solid Quad 4node 42 and confirm with [OK]. Fig. 9: Selection of finite element type (type number = 42). Fig. 10: List of defined element types including our previous choice (Plane42). We now have defined an element type with ID 1. Plane42 is a simple two-dimensional solid (plane) with four corner nodes and no interior nodes. Page 6 of 15

Choosing the [Options ] button (Fig. 10) brings up the following window. Fig. 11: Selection of the finite element behavior. Choose Element behavior K3 as Plane strs w/thk (= plane stress with thickness) and confirm with [OK]. Then close the previous window by hitting [Close]. This option is appropriate for plane plate-like structures which are only loaded in direction of the plane (Keyword: plane stress ). A detailed description of the finite element types is available in the help function of ANSYS. Press [Help] in the window (Fig. 11) for a detailed description of the used element type. A.3.2 Define Real Constants Real Constants are simple arrays of floating point numbers. They are used to configure the behavior of element types. Therefore their concrete meaning depends on the element type they are assigned to. Main Menu Preprocessor Real Constants Add/Edit/Delete Page 7 of 15

First push the [Add ] button in... then choose Type 1 and confirm with [OK] Fig. 12: Selection of real constant sets. Fig. 13: Choose the element type. Fig. 14: Define the real constants. Enter the appropriate value for the thickness of the beam and close the dialog box by confirming with [OK] and [Close] the following window. A.3.3 Meshing We now create a mesh by subdividing the geometry into finite elements of the specified type: Preprocessor Meshing Mesh Areas Mapped 3 or 4 sided Pick the area with the mouse pointer and confirm with [OK]. Page 8 of 15

Fig. 15: Meshed beam model A.4 Applying Loads and Boundary Conditions A.4.1 Boundary Conditions To setup the necessary support, we need to define nodal displacement constraints: Preprocessor Loads Define Loads Apply Structural Displacement On Nodes Pick the line to be fixed with the mouse pointer and confirm with [OK]. Fig. 16: Applying boundary conditions Set the upper value to All DOF (DOF = degrees of freedom) to apply a fully constrained boundary condition for the selected nodes and confirm with [OK]. A.4.2 Applying the Loads Preprocessor Loads Define Loads Apply Structural Force/Moment On Nodes Pick appropriate nodes to apply the load and confirm with [OK]. Page 9 of 15

Fig. 17: Apply forces on nodes. Enter the values in the appearing window and confirm with [OK]. B. Solving Fig. 18: Beam with elements, load and boundary conditions. B.1 Basic Settings: Analysis Type To set the analysis type to static choose the following path in the menu: Main Menu Solution Analysis Type New Analysis Then select the option Static. Fig. 19: Choose type of analysis. Page 10 of 15

B.2 Start solving Main Menu Solution Solve Current LS and confirm with [OK]. C. Postprocessor The post-processor is a tool to visualize the results of the solution phase. C.1 Contour Plot of Deformed Shape Go to... Main Menu General Postproc Contour Plot Nodal Solu... and then choose: Nodal Solution DOF Solution Y-Component of displacement Fig. 20: Select the type of contour plot. Page 11 of 15

Fig. 21: Deformed shape of the beam (scaled!). Colors represent displacements u y In the command line, first enter /dscale, 1, 1.0 to turn off automatic scaling of the displacement plot. Press [Enter], then enter /replot and again confirm by pressing [Enter]. Fig. 22: Deformed shape of the beam (not scaled!). Discuss the results which can be seen on the two figures above! Page 12 of 15

Correcting the Model: The value of the applied force was erroneously too high and should be corrected from 500,000 to 5,000 Newton. Use the command... Preprocessor Loads Define Loads Delete All Load Data All Forces On All Nodes... to delete the wrong loads. Perform the step earlier described in chapter A.4.2 to apply the correct force onto the nodes. Also, carry out a new solution step (see chapter B.2) and replot the new results (see chapter C.1). Fig. 23: Deformed shape of the beam (not scaled!) resulting from corrected force. Page 13 of 15

C.2 Contour Plot: X-Component of Total Strain General Postproc Plot Results Contour Plot Element Solu In the appearing window choose: Element Solution Total Strain X-Component of total strain Fig. 24: Contour plot of x-component of total strain. C.3 Contour Plot X-Component of Stress General Postproc Plot Results Contour Plot Element Solu In the appearing window choose: Element Solution Stress X-Component of total stress Fig. 25: Contour plot of x-component of stress. Page 14 of 15

C.4 Contour Plot: Von-Mises Equivalent Stress General Postproc Plot Results Contour Plot Element Solu In the appearing window choose the options: Element Solution Stress von Mises stress Answering the Questions: Fig. 26: Contour plot of Von-Mises equivalent stress. 1 Will the beam break and were would it start breaking? With the corrected force (F = 5,000 N) the beam will not break. The maximal predicted von Mises stress reaches values of σpred = 206 N/mm 2 (Fig. 26), whereas the ultimate yield stress σyield = 235 N/mm 2 is higher. That means the failure criterion σpred > σyield is not fulfilled. However, the difference between the two values is small. In many technical applications the factor of security should be 2.0 or even higher. The factor of security σyield/σpred reached in our example is much smaller. The critical region, were we would expect the beginning of a failure, is located at the left end of the half beam (Fig. 26, Symbol MX) at the location of maximum stresses. For the full length beam the critical region would lay in the middle where the force was applied (Fig. 1). 2 If not, what would be the maximum deflection w? We predicted a maximum deflection of w = 11 mm appearing at the free end (right side, symbol MX) of the simplified half model (Fig. 23). The full length beam under 3-pointbending (Fig. 1) will show a maximum deflection of the same amount in the middle. Page 15 of 15