Pavement Preservation and the Role of Bituminous Surface Treatments A Washington State View. Minnesota Pavement Conference February 14, 2008

Similar documents
Development of Warm Mix Asphalt Policies and Specifications in Minnesota

INPUT DATA PROCEDURES

Polymer-Modified Asphalts Enhancing HMA Performance. New Orleans, Louisiana January 28, 2003

Reliability of Results Depends On:

Road Surface Texture Evaluation with 3-D Laser Data

Recent Innovations in the Management of Irish National Roads

HDM Manager Version 3.0:

I-96 Case Study: Jointed Concrete Pavement Curling and Warp Presented in the Context of Pavement Asset Management

Detecting and Correcting Localized Roughness Features

Ministry of Transportation Ministry of Transportation. Warm Mix Asphalt OHMPA Fall Seminar December 11, Seyed Tabib

Hot-Mix Asphalt and Flexible Pavement Design: the MEPDG

DARWIN-ME Pavement Analysis and Design Manual for NJDOT

New Technologies for Pavement Evaluation

Georeferencing West Virginia DOT s Roadside Assets: An Asset Inventory Case Study. Geoff Dew April 13,

NJDOT Companion Manual to the 1993 AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures

Data Mining of the Caltrans. Pavement Management System (PMS) Database

Data-Mining of State Transportation Agencies Projects Databases

North Central Superpave Center Update. Becky McDaniel NCAUPG Meeting January 28, 2004 Omaha, Nebraska

CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF WEST VIRGINIA PRESENTS THE

North Central Superpave Center. Marketing Plan and Strategy

EVALUATION OF WARM MIX ASPHALT PERFORMANCE 2007 TO PRESENT BASED ON FIELD PERFORMANCE AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION

Illinois Bituminous Paving Conference Imad L. Al-Qadi. ICT - Where Transportation and Excellence Meet

FINAL REPORT ON LONG TERM OUTDOOR AGING STUDY OF WARM MIX SAMPLES MTE SERVICES, INC & THREE YEAR COMPARISON OF PG HMA & WMA

Alaska University Transportation Center

2.3. Quality Assurance: The activities that have to do with making sure that the quality of a product is what it should be.

Summary Listing of Ohio LTAP elearning Courses

Instructions for Using the PMIS MapZapper. Version 3.400

Local Road Surface Selection Tool Technical Report

Developing an Integrated Management System for the Urban Transportation Infrastructure

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. Another Look at Delineation of Uniform Pavement Sections Based on FWD Deflections Data

Instructions for Completing A Material Placement Notification (MPN) Through the CDOT Website

8/8/2018 Council Approval Presentation. 8/14/2018 MOVEBR Infrastructure Enhancement and Traffic Mitigation Plan 1

California Pavement Preservation (CP 2 ) Center

CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF WEST VIRGINIA PRESENTS THE

Oregon House Transportation & Economic Development Committee

Approval of Medical Center New Entrance Agreement

DESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM

Student Guide. Product P2. Validation of TxDOT Flexible Pavement Skid Prediction Model: Workshop

Pavement Surface Microtexture: Testing, Characterization and Frictional Interpretation

Combined Ranking Method for Screening Collision Monitoring Locations along Alberta Highways

Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis

Multi-Speed Deflectometer. An innovative tool for local authority network asset management

Guidelines for Traffic Counting. May 2013

Escambia-Santa Rosa Regional ATMS. Escambia-Santa Rosa Regional Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Florida Alabama TPO

Los Anseles W Department of 5* Water & Power

STUDY REPORT #1 ADDENDUM

FY International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Benchmarking Results

DISTRIBUTION OF QUANTITIES

NEW INDICATORS OF RIDING COMFORT BASED ON VEHICLE DYNAMICS. Pertti Virtala & Juho Meriläinen

Todd V. Scholz, Ph.D., P.E. Roadworthy Research & Design 1580 Royal Drive Reno, NV and

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Business Plan

Write an expression in x that represents the length:

SCDOT Technician Certification Program at Tri-County Tech. April 27, 2017 Columbia, SC

Site 17 W3-160 KEY: District Department of Transportation 55 M Street, SE, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20003

RPMA - Roadway Project Mapping Application

Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description G Planned Connecticut Avenue Northbound at Military Road Northwest

State of Wisconsin/Department of Transportation RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING: March 31, 2007

Indian National Olympiad in Informatics, 2014

Using the NIST Framework for Metrics 5/14/2015

SECTION 115 MATERIALS CERTIFICATION SCHOOLS PROGRAM

Contractor Quality and Contractor Buy In in Minnesota

S-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT

Essentials for professional use

Smoothness of Pavement in Weighin-Motion

Managed Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options Proposed next steps

DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PHASE I FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS

HDM-4 Inputs and Options

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description A Proposed I-395 Southwest after Exit 4, Eastbound

Data Center UPS Systems Why 1% Efficiency Matters

Math 381 Discrete Mathematical Modeling

OPTIMIZING 3D SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS DATA COLLECTION BY RE-USING THE DATA FOR PROJECT LEVEL ROAD DESIGN

SCDOT TENTATIVE LETTINGS December 2018 Subject To Change Without Notice

Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) Location/Linear Referencing System (LLRS) Design Process

Adaptive Signal Control in Atlanta District. Rebecca Wells, P.E. TxDOT Atlanta

MAJOR DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIORS AND FUNCTIONS. Features ProVAL 2.7 ProVAL 3.0* Separated project analysis file (*.pv2) and imported data files

Baltimore City Department of Public Works

Hands-on Exercise. All samples files are installed to the following folders depending on the OS:

ADOT Experience with Warm Mix Asphalt. Chad Auker Flagstaff Regional Materials Engineer ADOT - Materials Group

Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

The Practical Side of Cell Phones as Traffic Probes

Facebook West Campus. Planning Commission Meeting February 25, 2013

Teen Driving & Distracted Driving. Strategies To Save Lives. NCSL December 9, 2010

NCHRP 9-47A Update October 13, 2010

A NEW METHOD FOR ALIGNING AND SYNCHRONISING ROAD PROFILE DATA FOR BETTER ROAD ROUGHNESS GROWTH ANALYSIS. Robert P. Evans 1* and Arul Arulrajah 1

20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified

FWD Data Analysis. version Office of Materials Pavement Engineering Section Pavement Design Unit 1400 Gervais Ave Maplewood, MN

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Agenda. What would a 30% reduction in energy use do for your budget? The next generation of energy and infrastructure projects in MI

Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Secretary. Word Processor. Streets and Facilities Supervisor. Traffic Signal Technician.

Highlands Ranch Fire & Emergency Services Unification

3D Milling. Tom Abell

I-95 Corridor Coalition. Multi-State VMT-Based Road-User Fee Initiative. Mark F. Muriello

3D Laser Imaging for Pavement Survey at 60 mph and True 1mm Resolution

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Inside Southern part of 3rd Street Tunnel

XRMS XRMSSEG ROADWAY INVENTORY SEGMENTS

MID-ATLANTIC REGION TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

SW 8th Avenue Corridor & Financing

South Central ROP Projects

Proposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update

Transcription:

Pavement Preservation and the Role of Bituminous Surface Treatments A Washington State View Minnesota Pavement Conference February 14, 2008 1

The Situation 2 WSDOT policy, in essence, mandated use of BSTs for routes with an ADT < 2,000. Pavement preservation funding level (real dollars) is down. Pavement preservation funding is a WSDOT account used to pay for contract HMA and BST projects. Questions What is a reasonable ADT upper limit for application of BSTs? What kinds of pavement performance can we expect if more BSTs are done and fewer HMA overlays?

WSDOT Pavements by Surface Type PCC 11% BST 28% Surface Lane Miles BST 5,000 HMA 11,000 PCC 2,000 Total 18,000 HMA 61% 3

Preservation Policies and Practices Surface Common Preservation Comments Hot Mix Asphalt 45-mm overlay 10-16 year intervals most common All traffic levels All ESAL levels Bituminous Surface Treatment Single shot (application) BST 5-10 year intervals most common Lower traffic pavements AADT < 4,000 ESALs < 50,000/yr Portland Cement Concrete Either HMA overlay or dowel bar retrofit plus grinding Most over 30 years old Limited rehabilitation to date Most prevalent on NHS routes 4

WSDOT Lane-Miles by ADT AADT BST HMA Lane-miles Flexible (BST+HMA) All Types (BST+HMA+PCC) 0-2000 3,157 1,834 4,991 4,993 (28%) 2000-4000 819 1,645 2,464 2,486 (14%) 4000-6000 190 1,423 1,613 1,631 (9%) 6000-8000 8 840 848 934 (5%) 8000-10000 1 567 568 660 (4%) 10000-20000 4 2,094 2,098 2,572 (15%) 20000-40000 0 1,610 1,610 2,029 (11%) 40000-80000 0 1,032 1,032 1,360 (8%) 80000-160000 0 436 436 640 (4%) >=160000 0 132 132 360 (2%) 42% 5

FHWA IRI Thresholds for Interstate Highways Description PSR Rating IRI NHS Ride Quality Very Good 4.0 <1.0 m/km Good 3.5-3.9 1.0-1.5 m/km Fair 3.1-3.4 1.5-1.9 m/km Mediocre 2.6-3.0 1.9-2.7 m/km Acceptable (0-2.7 m/km) Poor 2.5 >2.7 m/km Less than Acceptable (>2.7 m/km) 6

Existing IRI Sorted by ADT ADT (2002) Average IRI (m/km) 0-2000 1.7 2000-4000 1.6 4000-6000 1.7 6000-8000 1.6 8000-10000 1.8 10000-20000 2.0 20000-40000 1.4 40000-80000 1.3 80000-160000 1.2 >=160000 1.6 7

WSDOT Pavement Preservation Funds Biennium Total Funds by Pavement Type 1,2 Funds 1,2 HMA BST PCC Other 1995-1997 258.9 163.2 16.4 28.7 50.6 1997-1999 305.1 234.1 18.1 36.0 17.0 1999-2001 259.7 198.8 23.7 27.2 9.9 2001-2003 248.2 213.2 17.7 5.3 11.9 2003-2005 221.0 184.0 21.7 1.6 13.8 2005-2007 206.9 145.0 37.8 20.1 4.0 2007-2009 241.9 177.1 46.5 16.6 1.7 Average 248.8 187.9 26.0 19.4 15.6 Note 1: Includes project engineering, construction engineering, safety, taxes. Note 2: Funds shown unadjusted for inflation. 8

Percentages of Pavement Preservation Funding by Type Biennium HMA BST Other 1995-1997 63% 6% 31% 1997-1999 77% 6% 17% 1999-2001 77% 9% 14% 2001-2003 86% 7% 7% 2003-2005 83% 10% 7% 2005-2007 70% 18% 12% 2007-2009 73% 19% 8% 9

Preservation Pinch 250% Percent Difference from 1995 Value 200% 150% 100% 50% 1995 Baseline = 100% HMA Price per Ton in Place WSDOT Preservation Funding 0% 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Year 10

Preservation Funds by Lane-Mile per Year Biennium Overall Funding Per Lane Mile Per Year 1,2 Preservation Funds by Pavement Type $/Lane-Mile/Year 1,2 HMA BST PCCP 1995-1997 7,200 7,600 1,700 6,300 1997-1999 8,500 10,900 1,900 8,000 1999-2001 7,300 9,200 2,500 6,000 2001-2003 6,900 9,900 1,800 1,200 2003-2005 6,200 8,500 2,200 400 2005-2007 5,800 6,700 3,900 4,400 2007-2009 6,800 8,200 4,800 3,700 Averages (1995-2009) 7,000 8,700 2,700 4,300 Note 1: Funding shown includes project engineering, construction engineering, safety, and taxes. Note 2: Amounts shown not adjusted for inflation. 11

Initial Bottom Line Not enough funding to fully preserve the route system. Increasing use of BSTs in lieu of 45mm thick HMA overlays however overlays are still and will continue to be the preservation treatment of choice. How did we examine the efficacy of increased BST use? First, let s quickly look at HMA performance. 12

Quick look at HMA Overlay Performance Performance for more recent (post Superpave) projects Rutting IRI Life by western and eastern Washington Projects placed between 1996 and 2001 Evaluated with 2006 pavement condition survey Pavement age: 5 to 10 years ½inch HMA only 26 projects 13

Average Performance 225 200 175 IRI PSC Rut 9 8 7 IRI (in/mi) or PSC 150 125 100 75 50 25 6 5 4 3 2 1 Rut (mm) 0 7 8 9 5 7 8 10 5 7 9 5 6 8 5 7 5 9 6 PG 58-22 PG 58-34 PG 64-22 PG 64-28 PG 64-34 0 14 Age (yrs) PG 70-28 PG 70-34 PG 76-28

Rutting 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 Rut (mm) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 PG 58-22 PG 58-34 PG 64-22 PG 64-28 PG 64-34 PG 70-28 PG 70-34 PG 76-28 15

16 Ride

HMA Overlay Life Pavement life is also a function of Construction practices Specifications Material selection Average Overlay Life (years) 18 16 14 12 10 8 East West All 6 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 17

$21,000 per lane-mile $240,000 per lane-mile 18

Key Question Could we save money by using BSTs on some roads that are currently surfaced with HMA? What is the effect on the WSDOT preservation budget? What is the effect on long-term network performance? What is the effect on the traveling public? Further What is a reasonable upper level of AADT, at which BST resurfacings can be used? What is a reasonable upper level of annual ESALs at which BST resurfacings can be used? What combination of BST resurfacings and HMA overlays produce a cost effective rehabilitation strategy? 19

HDM-4 (v2.03) The Highway Development and Management System software Integrates multiple models in a unified analysis Economic Material Structural Condition UW and WSDOT has experience with HMD-4 20

Preservation Strategies Modeled 21 HMA overlay only Only apply 45-mm overlays to all sections Triggers: 10% cracking, 10 mm rutting, 3.5 m/km IRI BST applications only Only apply BST surfaces to all sections Triggers: 10% cracking, 3.5 m/km IRI (no rutting trigger) BST and HMA treatment combination Apply a combination of BSTs and HMA overlays to all sections Triggers: BST: 10% cracking HMA: 3.5 m/km IRI For instance: 2 cycles of BSTs then 1 cycle of HMA overlay Open selection with any of the above three strategies HDM-4 is free to choose for each individual section, which of the 3 above strategies to use

HDM-4 Modeling Observations Model may be biased towards existing trends The treatment strategy selected is highly dependent on the initial roughness The BST/HMA combination strategy is often selected regardless Not able to fine-tune the BST effects enough The HDM-4 model schedules a large number of treatments in the first year HDM-4 is difficult to master HDM-4 software support is almost non-existent. 22

Preservation Strategy Comparison ADT less than 8,000 and annual design lane ESALs less than 40,000 Scenario a Equilibrium IRI c (m/km) Net Present Value b HMA overlay only 1.90 $17,758 BST application only 3.68 $17,856 BSTs interspersed with HMA overlays triggered at 3.5 m/km IRI 2.72 $18,170 Open selection 2.96 $18,187 Notes: a. Budget limitations are not used in triggering a resurfacing. b. All costs are in millions of present-day dollars. c. The IRI that a given scenario can maintain over time. 23

HDM-4 Estimated Roughness Conditions AADT less than 8,000 and annual design lane ESALs less than 40,000 4 BST applictaion only 3 Open selection IRI (m/km) 2 BSTs interspersed w ith HMA overlays triggered at 3.5 m/km IRI HMA overlay only 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Year 50 24

HDM-4 Results The NPV of all strategies are the same Increasing the use of BSTs appears to be economically feasible Agency expense and user costs increase over time for all strategies except the HMA overlay only option Reduced agency expenses will result in rougher pavements and higher user costs Higher BST use shifts cost from the agency to the user unless 25

HDM-4 Conclusions HDM-4 is of limited but some use. Routes with AADT > 2,000 are viable for BSTs. Considering more BSTs is not a mistake. The cost of maintaining a road network is largely a zero-sum game. 26

Overall Assessment (1) Analyses via HDM-4 showed that more lane-miles of BST OK from a NPV view. ADT criterion increases from 2,000 to 4,000-5,000. WSDOT Pavement Policy has been changed to reflect this. And there physically is no ADT limit for BSTs. More BSTs will likely increase the IRI on the route system but by a limited amount (cycles of BST/HMA overlays, level-up quantities, etc, limit IRI increases). BSTs will rarely be used through towns and cities or at major intersections. 27

Overall Assessment (2) Performance in Washington State BSTs apparently exceed typical national stats. HMA at or above national stats. Differences between western and eastern Washington need to be reduced. Does WSDOT need more pavement preservation funds? Of course but how much? Likely something close to $10,000/lane-mile/year. 28

Overall Assessment (3) Is WSDOT likely to get that much pavement preservation funding anytime soon NO. So what can be done? Tweak the mix of BST and HMA overlays (in progress). Maximize quality of both hence performance life. Monitor carefully via PMS. Don t do anymore HDM-4 analyses! 29

Thanks for you attention Questions? Contributors include Steve Muench, UW and Linda Pierce, WSDOT 30