Reviewed by CeemanB. Vellaithurai WSU ID:

Similar documents
Performance Assessment of Communication Network in WAMS

Chapter 2 State Estimation and Visualization

Failure Diagnosis and Cyber Intrusion Detection in Transmission Protection System Assets Using Synchrophasor Data

Applications of PTP in non-telecom networks. Anurag Gupta November 1 st -3 rd 2011, ITSF 2011

A Case for Multi-Function PMU

Digital Transformation of Power Delivery

Capacity Planning for Next Generation Utility Networks (PART 1) An analysis of utility applications, capacity drivers and demands

PMU Communication Network Analysis

Chapter 7 CONCLUSION

Routing Protocols in MANETs

Specifications for the Power Grid Simulator

Report: A Comparison of Synchrophasor Protocols

Networking for Data Acquisition Systems. Fabrice Le Goff - 14/02/ ISOTDAQ

Specifications for the Power Grid Simulator

SCE WASAS Combined Disturbance Fault Recorder (DFR) and Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) Specifications. Anthony Johnson

Homework 1. Question 1 - Layering. CSCI 1680 Computer Networks Fonseca

IEEE 1588v2 Time Synchronization in Energy Automation Applications Case Studies from China

Semantic Security Analysis of SCADA Networks to Detect Malicious Control Commands in Power Grids

THE OSI MODEL. Application Presentation Session Transport Network Data-Link Physical. OSI Model. Chapter 1 Review.

Solved MCQ of Computer networking. Set-1

ITEC 3210 M - Applied Data Communications and Networks. Professor: Younes Benslimane, Ph.D.

Networking and TCP/IP. John Kalbach November 8, 2004

Table of Contents. Cisco Introduction to EIGRP

Networking interview questions

Hybrid Control and Switched Systems. Lecture #17 Hybrid Systems Modeling of Communication Networks

Design and Performance Evaluation of a New Spatial Reuse FireWire Protocol. Master s thesis defense by Vijay Chandramohan

Investigating the Use of Synchronized Clocks in TCP Congestion Control

Question 7: What are Asynchronous links?

Redundancy in Substation LANs with the Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (IEEE 802.1w)

NIST Framework for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards - Overview of PMU Performance Testing

ECSE 414 Fall 2014 Final Exam Solutions

Synchrophasor Implementation Experience and Integration Challenges in Indian Grid

LS Example 5 3 C 5 A 1 D

PAP13 - Harmonization of IEEE C with IEC and Precision Time Synchronization

CS610 Computer Network Final Term Papers Solved MCQs with reference by Virtualians Social Network

A SIMULATION TOOL TO STUDY WIDE-AREA CONTROL SYSTEMS

CS 421: COMPUTER NETWORKS SPRING FINAL May 21, minutes

Interface The exit interface a packet will take when destined for a specific network.

CMSC 611: Advanced. Interconnection Networks

JULIO OLIVEIRA, ABB POWER GRIDS GRID AUTOMATION, DECEMBER 01 ST ABB Ability - Digital Substations. FISE 7a Edición

NASPI Reliability Coordinator Data Quality Survey Summary. Alison Silverstein NASPI Project Manager March 21, 2016

Routing with a distance vector protocol - EIGRP

BIAMP SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT GROUP TECHNICAL NOTES. Vocia Interfacing external CobraNet inputs and Outputs VOCIA COBRANET INPUTS & OUTPUTS

A Virtual Smart Grid

Jim McGhee, Utility Market Manager, RuggedCom Inc.

A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols. Broch et al Presented by Brian Card

EE-311 Data Communication & Networks

Internetworking Part 1

An Insight into IEC Protocol mplementation with ERLPhase new generation Devices

Flexible High-Speed Load Shedding Using a Crosspoint Switch

The Network Layer and Routers

Simulation & Performance Analysis of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocol

Toward a Reliable Data Transport Architecture for Optical Burst-Switched Networks

PMU Networking with IP Multicast

Part 5: Link Layer Technologies. CSE 3461: Introduction to Computer Networking Reading: Chapter 5, Kurose and Ross

Simulation of Power System Substation Communications Architecture Based on IEC Standard

Improving the Data Scheduling Efficiency of the IEEE (d) Mesh Network

SIPROTEC 5 Application Note

EE122 Spring 2001 Final

Phasor Technology Research Road Map to Improve Grid Reliability and Market Efficiency. Presented to TAC on April 5, 2005 and PAC on April 22, 2005

Using Time Division Multiplexing to support Real-time Networking on Ethernet

Lecture Outline. Lecture 2. OSI model and networking. The OSI model and networking. The OSI model and networking. The OSI model and networking

A Hybrid Systems Modeling Framework for Fast and Accurate Simulation of Data Communication Networks. Motivation

Chapter 6: DataLink Layer - Ethernet Olivier Bonaventure (2010)

CS519: Computer Networks

SDG&E s Accomplishments and Future Plans

Performance Analysis of TCP Variants

CS 43: Computer Networks Switches and LANs. Kevin Webb Swarthmore College December 5, 2017

Key Performance Aspects of an LTE FDD based Smart Grid Communications Network

A Software Development Toolkit for Real-Time Synchrophasor Applications

Application of synchronized monitoring for dynamic performance analysis. Monitoring Power System Dynamic Performance Using Synchronized Sampling

Network Management & Monitoring

ECE 650 Systems Programming & Engineering. Spring 2018

CS 421: COMPUTER NETWORKS SPRING FINAL May 16, minutes

Module 2 Storage Network Architecture

ZT series FAQ. ICP DAS Co., LTD 1

Trends in Distribution Automation for Active Distribution Grids. Univ.-Prof. Antonello Monti, Ph.D.

Gateway Design Challenges

Lecture (02) Network Protocols and Standards

Real-time and Reliable Video Transport Protocol (RRVTP) for Visual Wireless Sensor Networks (VSNs)

Analysis of End-to-End Delay Characteristics among Various Packet Sizes in Modern Substation Communication Systems based on IEC 61850

CSE 123A Computer Networks

Kyland solution for IEEE1588 Precision Time Synchronization in Electric Utilities

Networking Issues in LAN Telephony. Brian Yang

Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering & Technology (JECET)

Systems. Roland Kammerer. 10. November Institute of Computer Engineering Vienna University of Technology. Communication Protocols for Embedded

Introduction to Networking & NTP

Karl Iliev, San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Special expressions, phrases, abbreviations and terms of Computer Networks

Overview of Networks

Computer Networks. Routing Algorithms

Transport Layer Protocols TCP

Digital Substation Overview of Technology, Industry

Hands-On Wide Area Storage & Network Design WAN: Design - Deployment - Performance - Troubleshooting

OSI Model. Teran Subasinghe MBCS, Bsc.(Hons) in Computer Science - University of Greenwich, UK

Introducing IP Quality of Service

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Improved OLSR Protocol for VANET

Area Limitations on Smart Grid Computer Networks

Name of Course : E1-E2 CFA. Chapter 15. Topic : DWDM

Developing a Roadmap for A Smart(er) and Strong Transmission Grid

Transcription:

Reviewed by CeemanB. Vellaithurai WSU ID: 11253840

Introduction Smart Grid Communication Infrastructure/Communication Architecture Data Assumptions Simulation Assumptions Good contributions Drawbacks Research Project

Power delivery levels Transmission Distribution Why Transmission over Distribution level? Distribution level is not very well represented. This is changing with increase in smart meters More power being dealt with at transmission level Fast action needed to prevent damage of equipment incase of faults Applications at transmission level are time critical and need fast communication to support required actions.

Substation Substations transformvoltagefrom high to low, or the reverse, or perform any of several other important functions Measurements are taken at substations and sent to control centers

Sensing equipment in the field (Substation) Current or Voltage Transformer Data Concentrator Substation Gateway Measuring Devices Relays/PMU

Phasor Measurement Units (PMU) Measurement sampling rate is very high. Ranges between 30 to 120 samples per second Time synchronized through GPS. Hence, time stamped data is available Provides better time resolution due to higher sampling rate

Before PMUs? Measurement devices in the field were polled (Refers to request for data from a device) at some interval of time This interval of time used to range from a few seconds to a few minutes Polling requests reach different devices at different points of time, meaning the snapshot obtained about the system is not at a particular instant of time Data is not time stamped

So what is the problem? An application called State Estimator is used at control centers to estimate the state of the system Takes measurements from the system as input and estimate unknown parameters. Usually bus angle Also used to eliminate any erroneous measurements The filtered data is then used by various other applications

So what is the problem? Since most applications use State Estimator (SE) results, they are delayed by the computation time and frequency of running of the SE Since polling is not time synchronized, and data is not time stamped. Hence, it does not reflect the state of the system at a particular instant of time This makes it inaccurate Becomes a bottle neck in the system

PMU Advantage Since Voltage and angle are available directly from PMU, the SE problem changes from solving a set of non linear equations to solving linear equations. This greatly reduces the time required for computation. Better time resolution. Accurate snapshot of the system, due to availability of time stamped data. Data is accurate and reliable.

Taken from EE 581 Advanced Topics in Power System course taught by Dr. Anurag K Srivastava 10

PMU Advantage Computation time of SE is greatly reduced. Better time resolution. Accurate snapshot of the system, due to availability of time stamped data. Data is accurate and reliable. PMU data facilitates real time monitoring and control of power system. Provides better view of state of the system. Key Assumption: In this paper, it is assumed that all measurements are taken by PMUs only

Latency Requirement The Latency Requirement for an application is defined as the time between when the state was measured and when it was acted up by the application. Data Window It is the time period for which data needs to be collected before it can be used by an application.

Smart Grid Application Requirements

Simulations in the paper are done using Network Simulator 2 Version 2.34 The simulation is carried out for two different systems IEEE 14 bus system Polish 2383 bus system. This system has 6 different zones and provides complex topology which facilitates deeper analysis.

Control Center Location where smart grid applications are generally run. All Substations send data to control center. Special Protection Scheme (SPS) Substation Implementing protection schemes for special equipment like generators, which might require quick control.

IEEE 14 bus Power System

Bus (think of it as a substation)

S/S 9 S/S 6 S/S 0 S/S 8 S/S 7 S/S 5 S/S 4 S/S 3 Generation Substations S/S 1 S/S 2

S/S 9 S/S 6 S/S 0 S/S 8 S/S 7 S/S 5 S/S 4 S/S 3 Control Center Special Protection Scheme Substation S/S 1 S/S 2 20

S/S 9 S/S 6 S/S 0 S/S 8 S/S 7 S/S 5 S/S 4 S/S 3 Control Center Special Protection Scheme Substation S/S 1 S/S 2

Network CC Gateway CC Server

The parameters used for the different layers is given in the table. Layer Application Transportation Network Data Link Layer Protocol Constant Bit Rate (CBR) UserDatagram Protocol (UDP) Internet Protocol (IP) Ethernet Optic Fiber

Why CBR and UDP? CBR over UDP is used to simulate traffic in the system PMUs have constant rate of transmission. CBR accurately simulates this behavior UDP is chosen over TCP. This is because TCP requires pre allocation of resources. Also, in the case of data loss, retransmission of data might cause additional delays in transmission of subsequent data frames Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) is assumed to be 1500 bytes. This is reasonable for ethernet communications.

Data exchange levels All Substation to Control Center (I) Control Center to Control Substation (II) Generating Substation to Generating Substation (III) SPS to SPS (IV) SPS to Control Center (V) Control Center to Control Center (VI) It is assumed that these are the types of traffic present in the system. They are referred to as type 1 to type 6 traffic in the paper.

Information required Substation configuration Usually Known If not known, can assume generic breaker and a half scheme Connected equipment(generators, transformers etc. and associated measurement devices) The amount of PMU data to be sent can be calculated from the number of phasors to be sent. IEEE C37.118.2 standard provides for calculating the data frame size to be sent from each substation.

Data Frame Reference: IEEE C37.118.2 Standard for Synchrophasor Data Transfer for Power System

Assumptions It is assumed that all communication links are optic fiber with sufficiently high bandwidth to support PMU data transfer. OC-3 i.e. 155 Mbps is assumed Queue Size is set to 5000 Time to Live value is set at 64 hops

Assumptions It is assumed that all communication links are optic fiber with sufficiently high bandwidth to support PMU data transfer. OC-3 i.e. 155 Mbps is assumed Queue Size is set to 5000 Time to Live value is set at 64 hops Number of CC and SPS depends on size of network Shortest Path routing algorithm is used No control frames are being sent in the network. Meaning that there is one way communication, from substation to control center and not vice versa.

Assumptions Static Routing is assumed; i.e., no changes in network topology during simulation. PMU sampling rate is assumed to be set at 60 samples/second Processing delay in gateways is assumed to be zero 30

Assumptions Static Routing is assumed; i.e., no changes in network topology during simulation PMU sampling rate is assumed to be set at 60 samples/second Processing delay in gateways is assumed to be zero Propagation delay Network communication lines are assumed to be present along the transmission lines Power network reactance is converted to miles to calculate propagation delay Propagation delay within a substation network is assumed to be in the order of microseconds.

Metrics calculated from simulation Average Link Usage Maximum Delays for different traffic types Queuing Delays Number of hops

Derives communication architecture from a power system stand point This is important because, communication requirements of a power system are unique and different compared to other systems. Attempts to quantify bandwidth and latency requirements for the emerging smart grid Has been shown that the simulation is scalable (simulation is done for a 2383 bus system)

Considers only PMUs to be present throughout the system This is not true for a real system. The age of using only PMUs is still far away. Considers a static system (uses static routing) Doesn t include control frames. Assumes no disturbance or link failures. Uses NS2. This open source software came about in the early 2000s Development and support have been discontinued.

The authors have explored offline simulation using NS2 for a static case. Network Simulator 3 is a open source network simulator with emulation functionality. Meaning it can integrate with real devices to provide communication backbone.

The paper explores offline simulation. Network Simulator 3 is a open source network simulator with emulation functionality. Meaning it can integrate with real devices to provide communication backbone. SGDRIL lab setup can be used to include real data in the simulation. Simulation will have both real/simulated nodes.

Any Questions/Comments/Concerns/Objections? or anything else you want to ask