IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2017 Page 1 of 21

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 113 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Paper 22 Tel: Entered: January 29, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Case 2:05-cv DPH-MKM Document 27 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Paper 13 Tel: Entered: January 16, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

GOOGLE S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH PATENT RULE

Case 2:07-cv JCC Document 52 Filed 08/28/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER FOR UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBER 5,257,387

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. ServiceNow, Inc. Petitioner. BMC Software, Inc.

Paper Entered: May 1, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Paper 7 Tel: Entered: January 14, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

5/15/2015. Mangosoft v. Oracle. Case No. C JM. Plaintiff s Claim Construction Hearing Presentation. May 19, U.S.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 5:10-cv SL Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/30/10 1 of 8. PageID #: 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 86 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 771

Paper Entered: January 14, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv PBS Document 12 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Paper Date Entered: June 9, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

The following acknowledges applicable legal standards, which are more fully set forth in the parties' briefs.

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Paper Entered: February 27, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper Entered: May 24, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 49 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

United States District Court, M.D. Florida. BILLINGNETWORK PATENT, INC, Plaintiff. v. CERNER PHYSICIAN PRACTICE, INC. and Vitalworks, Inc, Defendants.

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. KYOCERA CORPORATION, and MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC Petitioners,

Craig Crandall Reilly, Law Office Of Craig C. Reilly, Alexandria, VA, for Defendants. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 5:18-cv LHK Document 55 Filed 12/06/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. Petitioner. COMPLEMENTSOFT, LLC Patent Owner

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Defendant. :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-CV-251-DF-CE

Paper Entered: June 23, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper 10 Tel: Entered: October 10, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,301,833 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

ORDER CONSTRUING THE TERMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 5,825,631; 5,717,761; 6,950,444; 5,880,903; 4,937,819; 5,719,858; 6,131,159; AND 5,778,234

Paper 17 Tel: Entered: September 5, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Case 1:10-cv LMB-TRJ Document 259 Filed 01/22/13 Page 1 of 75 PageID# 5910

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION PATENT CASE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Attorneys for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.

Case 3:18-cv G Document 1 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case5:08-cv PSG Document374 Filed11/19/12 Page1 of 4. [See Signature Page for Information on Counsel for Plaintiffs]

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. APPLE INC. Petitioner,

Case3:08-cv WHA Document237 Filed11/30/09 Page1 of 6

AIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00362

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD AMAZON.COM, INC., - vs. - SIMPLEAIR, INC.

Darren E. Donnelly, David Douglas Schumann, J. David Hadden, Laurie Charington, Lynn H. Pasahow, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, for Plaintiff.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 8:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

18 Civ. 269 COMPLAINT. Complaint for patent infringement against Defendants FanDuel, Inc. and FanDuel Limited

Paper No Date Entered: August 19, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. In the Inter Partes Review of: Attorney Docket No.:

John Allcock, DLA Piper US, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California. CABLE & WIRELESS INTERNET SERVICES, INC, Plaintiff. v. AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Defendant.

Case 2:09-cv NBF Document Filed 05/03/13 Page 1 of 16. EXHIBIT H Part 2

John L. Haller, Richard P. Sybert, Gordon and Rees, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-662

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Paper Date Entered: September 9, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 32 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv DLC Document 30 Filed 04/04/19 Page 1 of 22. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Petitioner

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. Petitioner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-KING

DEC OF MCNALLY ISO AMERANTH S OPPO TO DEFS MOTION TO 11-cv DMS (WVG)

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 Frank M. Weyer, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 TECHCOASTLAW 0 Whitley Ave. Los Angeles CA 00 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 fweyer@techcoastlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Frank M. Weyer and Troy K Javaher FRANK M. WEYER and TROY K. JAVAHER, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, MYSPACE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. CV 0-00 MRP (FFMx PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY DEFENDANTS MYSPACE, INC. AND FACEBOOK, INC. Date: October, 00 Time: :00 A.M. Ctrm: Judge: Hon. Mariana R. Pfaelzer

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTION... II. THE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION STANDARD 0 III. MYSPACE AND FACEBOOK EACH INFRINGE CLAIMS,,,, AND OF THE PATENT VI. CONCLUSION 0 ii

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: 0 0 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE NO. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., U.S. (.. C.A.R. Transp. Brokerage Co., Inc. v. Darden Rest., Inc. F.d ( th Cir. 000. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, U.S. (.. Elbex Video, Ltd. v. Sensormatic Electronics, Corp., 0 F.d (Fed. Cir. 00, Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., U.S. ( Phillips v. AWH Corp., F.d 0 (Fed. Cir. 00.. STATUTES U.S.C.... U.S.C...., U.S.C.... U.S.C...., U.S.C.... U.S.C.... RULES FRCP.. FRCP.. iii

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: 0 0 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES Pursuant to FRCP (a, FRCP, and U.S.C. and, Plaintiffs Frank Weyer and Troy Javaher ( Plaintiffs, move for summary adjudication of patent infringement against Myspace, Inc. ( Myspace and Facebook, Inc. ( Facebook for their unauthorized practice of the exclusive rights granted to Plaintiffs under U.S. Patent No.., which issued January, 00 ( the patent. Exh.. I. INTRODUCTION This action is a straightforward action for patent infringement. The patent at issue is U.S. Patent No.., which issued January, 00 ( the patent. The patent covers a specific method for providing internet home pages for members of a group. The method includes storing information about a member, associating the member s home page with an individual URL, and including on a member s home page data about the member and separate controls for sending a message to the member and for submitting a comment about the member. As shown in detail below, Myspace and Facebook each practice the patented invention by providing home pages for its members that include the features required by the patent claims. The patent has a single independent claim and fourteen dependent claims. Plaintiffs are moving for summary adjudication of infringement by each of Myspace and Facebook of claims,,,, and. II. THE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION STANDARD A party is entitled to summary adjudication of a claim or defense if the evidence establishes that there is no genuine dispute as to the material facts. FRCP (c. Plaintiffs, as the moving parties, bear the initial burden of establishing the absence of a genuine dispute. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., U.S., The Exhibits are attached to the Declaration of Frank Weyer ( Weyer Decl. filed concurrently herewith.

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: 0 0 (. Once that initial burden is met, the burden shifts to the opposing party, Myspace, to establish a triable issue of material fact with significant probative evidence. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, U.S., (; C.A.R. Transp. Borkerage Co., Inc. v. Darden Rest., Inc., F.d, 0 ( th Cir. 000. If all the admissible evidence submitted establishes that no reasonable trier of fact could find in favor of the opposing party, summary adjudication of issues is proper. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., U.S., (. III. MYSPACE AND FACEBOOK DIRECTLY INFRINGE THE PATENT BY PRACTICING THE PATENTED METHOD OF THE PATENT. A patent owner has the exclusive right to practice the patented invention. U.S.C. (a(. Anyone who practices that patented invention without the authorization of the patent owner directly infringes the patent, and: ( is liable for damages; and ( is subject to being enjoined from further infringement. U.S.C. (a and -. Determining Myspace and Facebook s infringement of the patent involves interpreting the meaning of the claims and determining whether Myspace and Facebook perform the method steps set forth in the claims. See e.g. Elbex Video, Ltd. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp., 0 F.d, 0 (Fed. Cir. 00. The Court is not required to separately interpret every term or phrase in a patent claim, especially in situations where the meaning of a claim term or phrase is readily apparent. Phillips v. AWH Corp., F.d 0, - (Fed. Cir. 00 (en banc. There is a strong presumption that claim terms have their ordinary and customary meaning to one of ordinary skill in the art. Elbex at. Thus, to determine infringement in this case, the facts are applied to the claims

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: 0 0 as interpreted to determine whether Myspace and Facebook perform each of the stemps set forth in the claims at issue. Elbex Video, 0 F.d at 0. As demonstrated herein, Myspace and Facebook each infringe the patent by performing each of the method steps set forth in claims,,,, and, as those claims are interpreted using the readily apparent, ordinary and customary meaning of each claim term. A. Introduction to the Patented Method of Claim of the Patent Claim of the patent claims a method for providing individual online presences for each of a plurality of members of a group of members. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. As explained in the patent specification, the term internet presence refers to an internet e-mail address and/or website, or other means for receiving or sending communications via the internet. (Exh., pg., col., line to col., line. The term members of a group of members means members of any group for which the invention has been implemented. (Exh., pg. 0, col., lines -. The term plurality is a well known term of art used in patents which means two or more. Thus, claim claims a method for providing and internet address and/or website for two or more members of a group of members for whom the invention has been implemented. For Myspace, a group of members for which the invention has been implemented is members who sign-up with Myspace. For Facebook, a group of members for which the invention has been implemented is members who sign up with Facebook. According to news reports Myspace has about,000,000 members and Facebook has over 00,000,000. (Exhs. -0. The method as claimed in claims,,,, and includes specific method steps performed by certain apparatus. The apparatus recited in claims,,,, and includes an interface server computer and a database system connected to Claim is the only independent claim of the patent. Claims,,, and are dependent on claim. That is, they include all of the claim elements of claim, plus the additional claim elements added by each respective dependent claim.

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: 0 0 the interface server computer. (Exh., pg., col., line to col., line. As explained in the patent specification, the Interface server 0 provides an interface to user computer 00 (for example in the form of one or more web pages that allows the user to select the intended recipient and specify the form of communication the user would like to use (e.g. sending an e-mail message or visiting the recipient's website. (Exh., pg. 0, col., lines -. Further, interface server 0 may be implemented as a dedicated server computer, a virtual server hosted by an internet service provider ("ISP", as a system of multiple interconnected computers, or may be implemented in any other appropriate manner. (Exh., pg. 0, col., lines -. The interface server computer can be accessed by specifying its URL. For the example embodiments described in the patent specification, the URL s for the interface server computer are www.everymd.com and www.interfaceserver.com. (Exh., pg. 0, col., lines -. The URL s for Myspace s and Facebook s interface server computers are www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com, respectively. (Weyer Decl. and. With respect to the claimed data base system, as explained in the patent specification, Data base may be directly connected to interface server 0, or may be connected to interface server 0 by the internet or by any other network or other telecommunications means. Data base may comprise a data base server system, data base files accessible by a data base manager program, or any other form of data base system. (Exh., pg. 0, col., lines -. Further, Data base may be directly connected to interface server 0, or may be connected to interface server 0 by the internet or by any other network or other telecommunications means. (Exh., pg. 0, col., lines -. Finally, data base need not In computing, a Uniform Resource Locator (URL is a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI that specifies where an identified resource is available and the mechanism for retrieving it. In popular usage and in many technical documents and verbal discussions it is often incorrectly used as a synonym for URI. The best-known example of a URL is the address of a web page on the World Wide Web, e.g. http://www.example.com. (Exh..

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: 0 0 comprise a separate system but may be integrated into interface server 0. (Exh., pg. 0, col., lines -. Claims,,,, and of the patent each recite certain method steps performed by the interface server computer and data base system. As shown in detail below, Myspace and Facebook each infringe claims,,,, and because their respective interface server computers (e.g. the computer systems at www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com, respectively perform all of the method steps recited in those claims. B. Myspace and Facebook Each Infringe Claim of the Patent Claim of the patent recites certain method steps performed by an interface server computer and a connected data base system. As shown below, the interface server computers and data base systems of Myspace and Facebook perform each of the claimed method steps of claim.. Myspace and Facebook Each Maintain a Database of Member Information The first step of claim is maintaining a database comprising information associated with each of said plurality of members at a database system connected to said interface server computer. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. Myspace and Facebook clearly maintain a database of information associated with their members at a database system connected to their interface server computers at www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com. That must be the case because when an individual member s Myspace or Facebook home page is requested from the Myspace or Facebook interface server computers, the received page contains information about the member (such as, for example, the member s name, birthday, residence city, etc.. To do so, that information must have been stored in a database, and the database must be connected to the interface server computers. Examples of information about a member shown on actual home pages of members of Myspace and Facebook are reproduced below (Exhs. - and -:

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Fig. Information from Myspace home page for Tech Coast Law Fig. Information from Facebook home page for TechCoast Law. Myspace and Facebook Each Allot Individual URL s to Each of a Plurality of Members The second step of claim is allotting individual URLS to each of said plurality of members by associating an individual URL with each individual member of said plurality of members in said database system. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. Myspace and Facebook allot individual URL s to their members. A form of URL used by Myspace is http://www.myspace.com/membernameornumber. An example is http://www.myspace.com/. (Weyer Decl. and. A form of URL used by Facebook is http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=membernameornumber. An example is http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=00000. (Weyer Decl. and. It is clear that the individual URL s are associated with the individual members in the database systems of Myspace and Facebook because Myspace and Facebook each provide a search facility where one can search their respective databases by member names, and in response to such a search the database provides the members URL s. (Weyer Decl. and, Exhs. and.

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page 0 of Page ID 0 0. Myspace and Facebook Each Associate a Home Page of a Member with the Member s Alloted Individual URL that Includes Information about the Member, a First Control for Submitting a Comment About the Member, and a Second Control for Sending a Message to the Member. The third step of claim is associating an individual home page for each said individual member of said plurality of members with said individual URL allotted to said individual member in said database system, said individual home page comprising information from said database associated with said individual member; a first control for submitting a comment about said individual member; and a second control separate from said first control for sending a message other than said comment to said individual member. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. Myspace and Facebook each associate an individual home page for a member with the URL allotted to that member. Those home pages are displayed, for example, when the URL for the member is entered in an internet browser such as Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, or Apple Safari. As shown in the Myspace and Facebook home pages for Tech Coast Law reproduced below (Weyer Decl. -0 and -, Exhs. - and -, the home pages of Myspace and Facebook members include information about the member, a first control for posting a comment about the member, and a second control for sending a message to the member:

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #:0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 Information about member Second control for sending a message First control for submitting a comment Fig. Myspace Home Page for Tech Coast Law (Exh.

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 Second control for sending a message Information about member First control for submitting a comment Fig. Facebook Home Page for TechCoast Law (Exh.. The www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com Server Computers Each Provide Member s Homepages in Response to Receiving Requests for the URL s Associated with the Member The last two steps of claim are receiving by said interface server an online request for said individual URL from a requesting source; providing said individual home page by said interface server computer to said requesting source. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. The interface server computers of Myspace and Facebook each provide a member s individual home page in response to receiving a request for the individual URL associated with the member. For example,

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 in response to receiving a request for the URL http://www.myspace.com/, Myspace s interface server computer at www.myspace.com returns the individual Myspace home page for Tech Coast Law shown in Fig. above. (Weyer Decl. -0 Exhs. -. Similarly, in response to receiving a request for the URL http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=00000, Facebook s interface server computer at www.facebook.com returns the individual Facebook home page for TechCoast Law shown in Fig. above. (Weyer Decl. -, Exhs. -. As shown above, Myspace and Facebook perform each of the method steps of independent claim. Accordingly, Myspace and Facebook each infringe independent claim. C. Myspace and Facebook Each Infringe Claim of the Patent Claim of the patent adds to the method of claim the additional step of providing by said interface server computer a message entry interface in response to activation of said second control. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. Myspace and Facebook s interface server computers at www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com each provide a message entry interface in response to activation of the respective second controls (i.e. the controls for sending a message to a member on a member s home page. For example, upon activating the control shown in Fig. above, Myspace s interface server computer provides the message entry interface shown below (Weyer Decl., Exh. : 0

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 Fig. Myspace Message Entry Interface (Exh. Similarly, upon activating the control shown in Fig. above, Facebooks s interface server computer provides the message entry interface shown below (Weyer Decl., Exh. : Fig. Facebook Message Entry Interface (Exh.

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 Accordingly, by performing all of the steps of claim as well as the additional step added by claim, Myspace and Facebook each infringe claim. D. Myspace and Facebook Each Infringe Claim of the Patent Claim of the patent adds to the method of claim the additional step of providing by said interface server computer a comment entry interface in response to activation of said first control. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. Myspace and Facebook s interface server computers at www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com each provide a comment entry interface in response to activation of the respective first controls (i.e. the controls for submitting a comment about a member on a member s home page. For example, upon activating the control shown in Fig. above, Myspace s interface server computer provides the comment entry interface shown below (Weyer Decl., Exh. : Fig. Myspace Comment Entry Interface (Exh. Similarly, upon activating the control shown in Fig. above, Facebooks s interface server computer provides the comment entry interface shown

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 below (Weyer Decl., Exh. : Fig. Facebook Comment Entry Interface (Exh. Accordingly, by performing all of the steps of claim as well as the additional step added by claim, Myspace and Facebook each infringe claim. E. Myspace and Facebook Each Infringe Claim of the Patent Claim of the patent adds to the method of claim the additional step of receiving by said interface server computer a message entered into said message entry interface. (Exh., pg., col., lines -0. After a user enters a message into Myspace and Facebook s message entry interfaces shown in Figs. and above and clicks on their respective Send controls, the interface server computers at www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com each provide a confirmation message that the message entered into the message entry interface has been sent, thereby demonstrating that the message has been received by the interface server computers (to send the messages, the interface server computers must have first received them. The confirmation messages provided by the Myspace and Facebook interface servers are shown in Figs. and 0 below (Weyer Decl. and 0, Exhs. and : Fig. Myspace Confirmation of Message Being Sent (Exh.

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 Fig. 0 Facebook Confirmation of Message Being Sent (Exh. 0 Accordingly, by performing all of the steps of claims and as well as the additional step added by claim, Myspace and Facebook each infringe claim. F. Myspace and Facebook Each Infringe Claim of the Patent Claim of the patent adds to the method of claim the additional step of receiving by said interface server computer a comment entered into said comment entry interface. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. After a user enters a comment into Myspace and Facebook s respective comment entry interfaces shown in Figs. and above and clicks on their respective Submit and Share controls, the comments entered into the comment entry interfaces appear on the home page of the member about whom the comment has been posted, as shown Figs. and below (Weyer Decl. -, Exhs. and :

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 Fig. Comment Appears on Member s Myspace Home Page (Exh. Fig. Comment Appears on Member s Facebook Home Page (Exh. To be able to post the comments entered into the comment entry interface on a member s home page, the Myspace and Facebook interface server computers must have received those comments. Accordingly, by performing all of the steps of claims and as well as the additional step added by claim, Myspace and Facebook each infringe claim.

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 G. Myspace and Facebook Each Infringe Claim of the Patent Claim of the patent adds to the method of claim the additional step of sending by said interface server computer a message to an existing e-mail address for said individual member in response to receiving said message entered into said message entry interface.. (Exh., pg., col., lines -. After a user enters a message into Myspace and Facebook s message entry interfaces shown in Figs. and above and clicks on their respective Send controls, the interface server computers at www.myspace.com and www.facebook.com each send a message to an existing email address of the member for whom the message has been entered into their respective message entry interfaces informing the member that a message has been sent to them. Examples of such messages sent by the Myspace and Facebook interface servers to existing email addresses of an individual member are shown in Figs. and below (Weyer Decl. - and 0-, Exhs. 0 and :

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #: Filed 0/0/0 Page 0 of Page ID 0 0 Fig. Myspace Message Sent to Existing Email Address of Member (Exh. 0 Fig. Facebook Message Sent to Existing Email Address of Member (Exh. Accordingly, by performing all of the steps of claims, and as well as the additional step added by claim, Myspace and Facebook each infringe claim. he

Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document #:0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID 0 0 IV. CONCLUSION As shown above and as summarized in the infringement claim charts of Exhs. and, there are no triable issues of material fact concerning Myspace and Facebook s infringing use of the methods claimed in Claims,,,, and of the patent. Summary adjudication of patent infringement, therefore, should be granted. Respectfully submitted, TECHCOASTLAW Dated: September, 00 By: Frank M. Weyer (State Bar No. 0 0 Whitley Ave. Los Angeles, CA 00 (0 - Fax (0-0 fweyer@techcoastlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs FRANK M. WEYER TROY K. JAVAHER