Terrafirma: a Pan-European Terrain motion hazard information service.

Similar documents
The STUN algorithm for Persistent Scatterer Interferometry

GMES TERRAFIRMA. Validation of existing processing chains in Terrafirma stage 2 LIST OF OSP DELIVERABLES EXTENDED

PSI Precision, accuracy and validation aspects

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. TOPS Interferometry Tutorial Issued May 2014

InSAR Operational and Processing Steps for DEM Generation

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Interferometric Evaluation of Sentinel-1A TOPS data

First TOPSAR image and interferometry results with TerraSAR-X

PSIC-4 validation activities

Ground deformation monitoring at the Phlegrean Fields (Naples, Italy) from the exploitation of SAR data in the framework of CAT-1 and DUP activities

Combining Airborne LIDAR and Satellite RADAR for a Dynamic DEM. Ramon Hanssen, Delft University of Technology

ON THE USE OF POINT TARGET CHARACTERISTICS IN THE ESTIMATION OF LOW SUBSIDENCE RATES DUE TO GAS EXTRACTION IN GRONINGEN, THE NETHERLANDS

MULTI-TEMPORAL INTERFEROMETRIC POINT TARGET ANALYSIS

In addition, the image registration and geocoding functionality is also available as a separate GEO package.

Combination of GNSS and InSAR for Future Australian Datums

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. Interferometry Tutorial Issued March 2015 Updated August Luis Veci

Interferometry Tutorial with RADARSAT-2 Issued March 2014 Last Update November 2017

AMBIGUOUS PSI MEASUREMENTS

SENTINEL-1 SUPPORT IN THE GAMMA SOFTWARE

MULTI-TEMPORAL SAR DATA FILTERING FOR LAND APPLICATIONS. I i is the estimate of the local mean backscattering

TANDEM-X: DEM ACQUISITION IN THE THIRD YEAR ERA

Mission Status and Data Availability: TanDEM-X

GMES TERRAFIRMA: VALIDATION OF PSI FOR USERS RESULTS OF THE PROVENCE INTER-COMPARISON

Individual Interferograms to Stacks

Individual Interferograms to Stacks!

ARTIFICIAL SCATTERERS FOR S.A.R. INTERFEROMETRY

GAMMA Interferometric Point Target Analysis Software (IPTA): Users Guide

Repeat-pass SAR Interferometry Experiments with Gaofen-3: A Case Study of Ningbo Area

THE STUN ALGORITHM FOR PERSISTENT SCATTERER INTERFEROMETRY. Bert M. Kampes, Nico Adam

Lateral Ground Movement Estimation from Space borne Radar by Differential Interferometry.

THREE DIMENSIONAL SAR TOMOGRAPHY IN SHANGHAI USING HIGH RESOLU- TION SPACE-BORNE SAR DATA

Persistent Scatterers Interferomatry Independent Validation and Intercomparison of Results. Executive Summary

WIDE BASELINE INTERFEROMETRY WITH VERY LOW RESOLUTION SAR SYSTEMS

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

10.1 Conversions. Grid to Geodetic

Digital Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data

Geometric and Radiometric Calibration of RADARSAT Images. David Small, Francesco Holecz, Erich Meier, Daniel Nüesch, and Arnold Barmettler

GMES TERRAFIRMA. Validation of existing processing chains in Terrafirma stage 2. Final report

The 2017 InSAR package also provides support for the generation of interferograms for: PALSAR-2, TanDEM-X

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. Offset Tracking Tutorial Issued August Jun Lu Luis Veci

SUBSIDENCE MONITORING USING CONTIGUOUS AND PS-INSAR: QUALITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON PRECISION AND RELIABILITY

ALOS-PALSAR performances on a multiple sensor DInSAR scenario for deformation monitoring

Generate Glacier Velocity Maps with the Sentinel-1 Toolbox

TerraSAR-X Applications Guide

IDENTIFICATION OF THE LOCATION PHASE SCREEN OF ERS-ENVISAT PERMANENT SCATTERERS

The Staggered SAR Concept: Imaging a Wide Continuous Swath with High Resolution

Scene Matching on Imagery

DEFORMATION MONITORING OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE BY TOMOGRAPHIC SAR USING MULTI-VIEW TERRASAR-X DATA STACKS

Airborne Differential SAR Interferometry: First Results at L-Band

Interdisciplinary Approach to Design, Analysis, and Modeling of Deformation Surveys

Interferometric processing. Rüdiger Gens

A GLOBAL BACKSCATTER MODEL FOR C-BAND SAR

Coherence Based Polarimetric SAR Tomography

DEFORMATION MEASUREMENT USING INTERFEROMETRIC SAR DATA

Quality of the TanDEM-X DEM

THE PERMANENT SCATTERERS TECHNIQUE. Sept. 3, 2007 Lecture D1L7 Terrain Motion Rocca

APPLICATION OF SAR INTERFEROMETRIC TECHNIQUES FOR SURFACE DEFORMATION MONITORING

Navigation for Future Space Exploration Missions Based on Imaging LiDAR Technologies. Alexandre Pollini Amsterdam,

SAR time series. JM Nicolas F. Tupin

GMES TERRAFIRMA. ESRIN/Contract no /03/I-IW. S5: Service Portfolio Specifications Version 2.02 April Geraint Cooksley NPA

RADARGRAMMETRY AND INTERFEROMETRY SAR FOR DEM GENERATION

RESOLUTION enhancement is achieved by combining two

Three critical concerns for marine seismics with portable systems. Source strength and tuning Streamer length 2D vs. 3D

DINSAR: Differential SAR Interferometry

Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI

TerraS ar-x / T ande M-X Capabilities & Utility

Deformation Monitoring Using Sentinel-1 SAR Data

URBAN FOOTPRINT MAPPING WITH SENTINEL-1 DATA

A new method for measuring deformation on volcanoes and other natural terrains using InSAR persistent scatterers

SEA SURFACE SPEED FROM TERRASAR-X ATI DATA

Experimental Radar Modes with TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X

A STATISTICAL-COST APPROACH TO UNWRAPPING THE PHASE OF INSAR TIME SERIES

VALIDATION OF PERSISTENT SCATTERERS INTERFEROMETRY OVER A MINING TEST SITE: RESULTS OF THE PSIC4 PROJECT

Operational use of the Orfeo Tool Box for the Venµs Mission

ALOS PALSAR VERIFICATION PROCESSOR

Hydrological network detection for SWOT data. S. Lobry, F. Cao, R. Fjortoft, JM Nicolas, F. Tupin

LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR LONG-TERM TERRAIN DEFORMATION WITH DINSAR (CPT: COHERENT PIXELS TECHNIQUE)

Do It Yourself 8. Polarization Coherence Tomography (P.C.T) Training Course

Correcting INS Drift in Terrain Surface Measurements. Heather Chemistruck Ph.D. Student Mechanical Engineering Vehicle Terrain Performance Lab

ANALYSIS OF THE GEOMETRIC ACCURACY PROVIDED BY THE FORWARD GEOCODING OF SAR IMAGES

2-PASS DIFFERENTIAL INTERFEROMETRY IN THE AREA OF THE SLATINICE ABOVE- LEVEL DUMP. Milan BOŘÍK 1

Filtering, unwrapping, and geocoding R. Mellors

ifp Universität Stuttgart Performance of IGI AEROcontrol-IId GPS/Inertial System Final Report

Signal Processing Laboratory

PSIC4 Persistent Scatterers Interferometry Independent Validation and Intercomparison of Results. Final Report

Simulation of Brightness Temperatures for the Microwave Radiometer (MWR) on the Aquarius/SAC-D Mission. Salman S. Khan M.S. Defense 8 th July, 2009

Memorandum. Clint Slatton Prof. Brian Evans Term project idea for Multidimensional Signal Processing (EE381k)

PS wave AVO aspects on processing, inversion, and interpretation

Motion compensation and the orbit restitution

A New Method for Correcting ScanSAR Scalloping Using Forests and inter SCAN Banding Employing Dynamic Filtering

COSMO SkyMed Constellation

SAOCOM 1A INTERFEROMETRIC ERROR MODEL AND ANALYSIS

DLR Contributions to Spaceborne Polar Observing Systems - SAR

MODIS Atmosphere: MOD35_L2: Format & Content

MODULE 3 LECTURE NOTES 3 ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTIONS

DEM Processing Chain & Data Products

INSAR QUALITY CONTROL: ANALYSIS OF FIVE YEARS OF CORNER REFLECTOR TIME SERIES

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

Innovative Visual Navigation Solutions for ESA s Lunar Lander Mission Dr. E. Zaunick, D. Fischer, Dr. I. Ahrns, G. Orlando, B. Polle, E.

ERS AND ENVISAT DIFFERENTIAL SAR INTERFEROMETRY FOR SUBSIDENCE MONITORING

Transcription:

Terrafirma: a Pan-European Terrain motion hazard information service www.terrafirma.eu.com The Future of Terrafirma - Wide Area Product Nico Adam and Alessandro Parizzi DLR Oberpfaffenhofen Terrafirma User Workshop, Essen, 22 March 2011 Page 1

Introduction What is the Wide Area Product (WAP)? Challenges in processing wide areas Summary Page 2

What is the WAP? Subsidence monitoring product with Pan-European coverage It is a mosaic of single full fame stacks 100 Km x 100 Km per stack for actual sensors e.g. ERS and 250 Km x 250 Km per stack for Sentinel-1 interferometric wide swath mode. It is based on PSI long time phase stable point scatterers are used for the estimation, no use of additional distributed scatterers or SBAS processing, the deformation information is irregular sampled, the quality of the estimate varies spatially (e.g. quality is reduced over rural areas) and in some areas the deformation information can be missing. Page 3

What is the WAP? Subsidence monitoring product with Pan-European coverage It is a mosaic of single full fame stacks 100 Km x 100 Km per stack for actual sensors e.g. ERS and 250 Km x 250 Km per stack for Sentinel-1 interferometric wide swath mode. It is based on PSI long time phase stable point scatterers are used for the estimation, no use of additional distributed scatterers or SBAS processing, the deformation information is irregular sampled, the quality of the estimate varies spatially (e.g. quality is reduced over rural areas) and in some areas the deformation information can be missing. Page 4

What is the WAP? It is easy to interpret estimated and provided motion is restricted to a linear deformation model. it maintains high resolution information (i.e. no spatial averaging of persistent scatterers) each point is characterised by: latitude, longitude, PS height with respect to the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), PU the average velocity and a quality indicator. It includes a preview for the characterisation of the test site. map can be reduced in resolution. could be named motion zone map. 0.3 mm 1 year std. dev. of slope uncertainty: 0.3 mm/y Page 5

What is the WAP? It is easy to interpret estimated and provided motion is restricted to a linear deformation model. it maintains high resolution information (i.e. no spatial averaging of persistent scatterers) each point is characterised by: latitude, longitude, PS height with respect to the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), the average velocity and a quality indicator. It includes a preview for the characterisation of the test site. map can be reduced in resolution. 0.3 mm 1 year std. dev. of slope uncertainty: 0.3 mm/y could be named motion zone map. Page 6

What is the WAP? It is easy to interpret estimated and provided motion is restricted to a linear deformation model. it maintains high resolution information (i.e. no spatial averaging of persistent scatterers) each point is characterised by: latitude, longitude, PS height with respect to the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), the average velocity and a quality indicator. It includes a preview for the characterisation of the test site. map can be reduced in resolution. could be named motion zone map. Page 7

What is the WAP? It is easy to interpret estimated and provided motion is restricted to a linear deformation model. it maintains high resolution information (i.e. no spatial averaging of persistent scatterers) each point is characterised by: latitude, longitude, PS height with respect to the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), the average velocity and a quality indicator. It includes a preview for the characterisation of the test site. map can be reduced in resolution. could be named motion zone map. Page 8

What is the WAP? It does not deliver internal data e.g.: Time series, Atmospheric correction, DEM updates. It combines acquisitions taken from one path direction alone No combination of ascending and descending. It is automatically generated It is not hand tuned in difficult situations. It is reduced in cost compared to the existing Terrafirma H1 product. Currently, 25K per stack of 100 Km x 100 Km. Processing costs are subject of optimization in order to lower the price in the future. Page 9

What is the WAP? It does not deliver internal data e.g.: Time series, Atmospheric correction, DEM updates. It combines acquisitions taken from one path direction alone No combination of ascending and descending. It is automatically generated It is not hand tuned in difficult situations. It is reduced in cost compared to the existing Terrafirma H1 product. Currently, 25K per stack of 100 Km x 100 Km. Processing costs are subject of optimization in order to lower the price in the future. Page 10

What is the WAP? Standard product for Sentinel-1 Two satellites Launch of Sentinel-1A envisaged in 2013 Launch of Sentinel-1B in 2014+ (few years later) Repeat cycle: 12 days (6 days S-1A / S-1B) Nominal lifetime: 7 years each Sentinel-1: TOPS acquisition mode Page 11

What is the WAP? Standard product for Sentinel-1 Sentinel-1: TOPS acquisition mode TOPS is an acronym: Terrain Observation by Progressive Scans Wide swath coverage similar to ScanSAR however: No scalloping (periodical amplitude modulation) No azimuth varying resolution No azimuth varying ambiguity ratio No azimuth varying Noise Equivalent σ 0 250 km 5m 20m Page 12

What is the actual WAP? Standard product for Sentinel-1 Terrafirma provides preview on Sentinel 1 wide area monitoring Data from ERS instead of Sentinel-1 Similar Resolution Wavelength: C-Band 45 40 35 30 incidence angle [deg] Envisat/ASAR IS4 IS5 IS6 IS7 ground range [km] TOPS 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 Different Coverage Incidence angle Repeat cycle: 35 vs. 12/6 days (factor 3 6) TOPS (scan synchronisation) Wavelength: 5.56 vs. 5.55 cm 25 20 15 ERS IS1 IS2 IS3 S-1A 350 300 250 200 Page 13

Terrafirma: A Pan-European Terrain Motion Hazard Information Service Light Pollution Map PS Candidates Map North Germany Romania Tuscany Sofia/Bukarest NAF Albania Page 14 North Greek

Challenge in processing wide areas Data amount (20x20 km 100x100 km) Difficult atmosphere compensation Low PS density Spatially varying PS quality Spatial error propagation Compensation by new techniques Atmospheric effect mitigation L1 and L2 Norm Network Inversion Robust and operator free processing Page 15

Challenge in processing wide areas Data amount (20x20 km 100x100 km) Difficult atmosphere compensation Low PS density Spatially varying PS quality Spatial error propagation Compensation by new techniques Atmospheric effect mitigation L1 and L2 Norm Network Inversion Robust and operator free processing Page 16

Challenge in processing wide areas Data amount (20x20 km 100x100 km) Difficult atmosphere compensation Low PS density Spatially varying PS quality Spatial error propagation Compensation by new techniques Atmospheric effect mitigation L1 and L2 Norm Network Inversion Robust and operator free processing Page 17

Challenge in processing wide areas No error propagation Data amount (20x20 km 100x100 km) Difficult atmosphere compensation Low PS density Spatially varying PS quality Spatial error propagation Compensation by new techniques Atmospheric effect mitigation L1 and L2 Norm Network Inversion Global error propagation Robust and operator free processing mm/year -4 0 +4 Page 18

PSI Reference Network: Least Redundancy Three arcs per PS Maximum distance: 1km Strong error propagation Unestimated areas High standard deviation Page 19

PSI Reference Network: High Redundancy Ca. 10 arcs per PS Maximum distance: 1km Huge network matrix High memory consumption High computational load Page 20

New Algorithms: PSI Reference Network L1- and L2- norm integration Huge number of variables: # PSs is # unknown * connectivity is equations Page 21

Difficulties: Temporal Variability Temporal data support 35days 12/6 days Trade-off between simple and suitable deformation model Page 22

Summary WAP: Wide Area Product (PSI based) Subsidence monitoring product with Pan-European coverage Many algorithmic updates L1- and L2- norm integration Mitigation of atmospheric effects Delivery of preview in summer Page 23