Risk Assessment of Damages due to Lightning Discharges: A Case Study to a Telecommunication System in Singburi Province of Thailand.

Similar documents
2 Principle of lightning protection

Manual for overvoltage protection for LED luminaires rev 1

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Technology Live Workshop

INTERNATIONAL. Protection against lightning Part 4: Electrical and electronic systems within structures

BS EN :2012 Part 2: Risk Management

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication TECHNICAL REPORT

Lightning Protection for a Complex Isolated Renewable and Diesel Power Network Micro Grid

ITU-T Recommendations and the Resistibility of Telecommunication Equipment

ALLTEC PROTECTION PYRAMID TM FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR FIELD

BS th Edition wiring regulations Furse overview

Overvoltage Protection

Cirprotec Technical Article No. 5

PREVENTING DOWNTIME OF E911 CENTERS

Operating tunnels safely Overvoltage protection for critical systems in tunnels

SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICES

ITU-T K.85. Requirements for the mitigation of lightning effects on home networks installed in customer premises

Lightning and Surge Protection of Cellular Transmit Sites

Session Two: Effective Surge Protection Installation

Telcordia GR-1089-CORE Issue 4 Topics Primary Protection

Retrofitting sewage plants with lightning and surge protection measures

PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS Comprehensive lightning protection

Chapter 1 Introduction to Outside Plant

LIGHTNING PROTECTION

Tel: Web: Lightning and surge protection help pages

Commercial and Industrial LV Power Protection

Introduction to Surge Protection

Code for Design Protection of Structures Against Lightning

Lightning and Surge Protection for PV Systems

LIGHTNING AND SURGE PROTECTION

Outdoor Risk and Equipment Protection

LIGHTNING PROTECTION FOR ROOFTOP PV PLANTS LIGHTNING & SURGE PROTECTION SYSTEM

Fundamentals of Thyristor Overvoltage Circuit Protection

Surge Protection. Presenter: Joe Zullo Chirico Scientific LLC

ITU-T K.66. Protection of customer premises from overvoltages SERIES K: PROTECTION AGAINST INTERFERENCE. Recommendation ITU-T K.

Lightning Protection and Grounding Guidelines

Coordination of Surge protection devices

Application Note. Table 1. Test requirements by equipment type

1278 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, VOL. 21, NO. 3, JULY 2006

INTRODUCTION TO SPECIFYING SURGE PROTECTION SURGE PROTECTION NOTE 1 INTRODUCTION TERMS PROBABILITY OF SURGES APPEARING:

Surge Protection for Industry

RUFIS. Remote Radio Head (RRH) Unit Field Installation System. Ease your transition towards next generation base stations

GROUNDING & PROTECTION OF NEWER ELEMENTS in TELECOM

Making the Right Choices In Lightning & Surge Arrestors Some Basics:

Presented by: Ron Hotchkiss Chairman, IEEE PES Surge Protective Devices Committee

CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM OF MAINS INDEPENDENT RENEWABLE ENERGY HYBRID-SYSTEMS PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES

ENGR. MARITES R. PANGILINAN, P.E.E.

The Wave Breaking Factor and it s Vital Role in Surge Protection Device Coordination. Hans Slagter, DEHN + SOHNE

M ISCELLANEOUS A CCESSORIES O BSTRUCTIONS LIGHTS MISCELLANEOUS ACCESSORIES OBSTRUCTION LIGHTS

ITU-T K.118. Requirements for lightning protection of fibre to the distribution point equipment SERIES K: PROTECTION AGAINST INTERFERENCE

YOU NEED A WHOLE- HOUSE PROTECTION SYSTEM

Equipment protection

Line reactors SINAMICS. SINAMICS G130 Line reactors. Safety information 1. General. Mechanical installation 3. Electrical installation

First Year Operation Events for EgyptSat-1: Ground Control Station Lightening strike and Protection Measures"

AC Surge Protection Devices

Lightning and Surge Protection of Photovoltaic Installations. Leutron GmbH 2013 Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany

LIGHTNING DANGEROUS CAUSED BY POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES INSIDE STRUCTURES

Over Voltage Protection Standardization in Japan

USER MANUAL MODEL 570/ Base-T (CAT-5) Surge Protectors SALES OFFICE (301) TECHNICAL SUPPORT (301)

SE Engineering, PC strives to be a leader in the power system engineering field by providing our customers with the highest level of quality,

AN579 Application note

Design of Lightning Protection Systems. DEHNsupport Toolbox Software.

MONITORING ABSTRACT KEYWORDS. TRANSFORMERS MAGAZINE Special Edition: Bushings, 2017

National Standard of The People s Republic of China

ABB Surge Arresters Contribution to Power Quality Line Side Protection

Lightning Protection as Per IEC & Key Factors of Installation, Maintenance

"Powering and Protecting Networks and Equipment Connected to It" Jim Pelegris ITW/LINX

White Paper Surge Protective Devices in Automatic Transfer Switches

GUIDE TO VERIFYING SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICES INSTALLED IN LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS ARE COMPLIANT WITH UL 96A.

Technical Requirements for High-voltage DC Power Feeding Interfaces of ICT equipment

Small Power Station Surge Protection Analysis and Plan

REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH

An Overview of Surge Protection for the Smart Grid IEEE PES/SPDC WG Matt Wakeham, Chair

10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Process Industry Requirements Steffen Graber Pepperl+Fuchs

Overvoltage Protection Devices

Lightning Surge Response Improvement by Combinations of Varistors and Gas Discharge Tubes

Lightning Surge Response Improvement by Combinations of Varistors and Gas -Discharge -Tubes

SURGE PROTECTION OPTION

DGSZV-EP DIGITAL GALVANIC LONGITUDINAL DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION. Application field

Dirty Power... A Guide to Surge Suppression & Filtering. Surge & Signal Protection for Business-Critical Continuity. EmersonNetworkPower.

DRAFT. Application Note: Modbus/RS485 Wiring for Conext Core XC Series Inverters. 1.0 Introduction DANGER. 1.1 Related Documents

LPI SST Surge Filters

Data Sheet. Surge protection devices - A technical overview

CPS block & CPS nano UL rd Ed. Surge protective devices (SPD)

Technical Data Sheet Medium Current Power Surge Filters

Lightning Current Equipotential Bonding SPDs

G5 PDU Installation Guide

4-W HDSL/56Kbps Isolation Card With 130/190V Span Powering. Description & Installation P30140

PROTEC Z LV the universal solution for transient switching protection for LV motors, generators, transformer LV secundaries, VSD and UPS equipment

Systems which use a conventional POTS subscriber line to dial a compatible system and transfer digital data.

Important Information KX-NTV150. Communication IP Camera. IP Video Doorphone. Model No. Model No. KX-NTV160

Exercise 2. Single Bus Scheme EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE. The single bus scheme DISCUSSION

DEHN tests and analyses DEHN Test Centre.

Operating instructions IO-Link master CabinetLine AL19xx

VersaPoint I/O Module

Reliability in Surge Protection. Photovoltaic Systems.

SERIES K: PROTECTION AGAINST INTERFERENCE

Secondary Surge Arrester Instruction Manual Page 1 of 5

ELG4125: System Protection

Point-of-Use Surge Protection

Transcription:

Proceedings of the 2007 WSEAS Int. Conference on Circuits, Systems, Signal and s, Gold Coast, Australia, January 17-19, 2007 216 Risk Assessment of Damages due to Lightning Discharges: A Case Study to a System in Singburi Province of Thailand. P.Unahalekhaka Rajamangala University of Ttechnology Suvarnabhumi,Thailand K.Chinnabutr Rajamangala University of Technology Isan,Thailand S.Paijit TOT Public Company Limited,Thailand S.Asawasripongtorn Kasetsart University,Thailand Abstract: - The paper describes a case study on risk assessment of damages to a telecommunication site with adjacent antenna mast. The site is located in the town centre of Singburi Province of Thailand. The risk analysis is based on an IEC standard [1, 2] and ITU T recommendation [3, 4]. The aim of the risk analysis is to study the effect from the ac power supply lines on the annual number of expected damages due to lighting discharges. The analysis shows that by reducing the route length of power cables the frequency of damage can be decreased significantly. Also, the implementation of SPDs at the entrance of power cables into the telecommunication contribute to a further decrement of damage. Key-Words: - Risk assessment, Overvoltage, Number of damage, Surge protective device, Lightning discharges and Site 1 Introduction networks are vulnerable to electrical damages from lightning or other surges. As the networks become more complex and the wide spread use of radio stations with high antenna mast for wireless communication has significantly increased the risk for damages. Where the general public, subscriber or employees are concerned, safety from electrical shock and other hazard should be of prime consideration. Protection of plant and equipment is a secondary consideration. Various protection measures are available and the most appropriate protection measure to be provided can be determined by risk assessment procedure described in this paper. 2 Lightning disturbances affecting a telecommunication site IEC 62305 2 [1] describes four different paths [Fig. 1] to which over voltages entering a network within a telecommunication due to lightning strikes for the following sources:- S1 : flashes to the. S2 : flashes near the. S3 : flashes to connected telephone service lines or power lines. S4 : flashes near connected telephone service lines or power lines. Flashes to the or connected telephone service lines may cause physical damage and life hazards. Flashes near the or near connected telephone service lines as well as flashes to the or connected telephone service lines may cause failure of electrical or electronic systems due to overvoltages resulting from resistive and inductive coupling of these systems with the lightning current. Moreover, failures caused by lightning overvoltages in subscribers installations and in power supply lines may also generate switching type overvoltages in the installation. The number of lightning flashes influencing the and the telephone services depends on the dimensions and the characteristics of the telecommunication structure and of the connected telephone service lines, on the environment characteristics of the and the connected telephone service lines, as well as on lightning ground flash density in the region where the and the telephone service lines are located. The probability of lightning damage depends on the, the telephone service lines, and the lightning current characteristics;

Proceedings of the 2007 WSEAS Int. Conference on Circuits, Systems, Signal and s, Gold Coast, Australia, January 17-19, 2007 217 as well as on the type and efficiency of applied protection measures. The annual mean amount of the consequential loss depends on the extent of damage and the consequential effects which may occur as a result of a lightning flash. The effect of protection measures results from the features of each protection measure and may reduce the damage probabilities or the amount of consequential loss. The risks involved in failing to address the issue of lightning overvoltage protection can be summarized by the following:- Partial or complete loss of operations and system downtime resulting in lost revenue. Customer complaints in response to system downtime. Physical damage to equipment resulting in repair or replacement costs. Danger to staffs and other personnel from the effects of lightning discharges. 3 Risk Assessment The risk assessment of possible damage due to lightning consists of the assessment of the following quantities related to the location of the network under consideration. Key parameters described by [2] include lightning flash density, earth resistivity, nature of the installation (buried, aerial, shielded or unshielded cable) and resistibility of equipment to be protected. Completion of risk assessment will determine the extent to which protection measures need to be undertaken in order to satisfy the requirements of standards and performance targets of the network provider. The selection of the most appropriate protection measures will be based on the information gained from the risk assessment process as well as additional considerations given to the cost and benefit analysis. Installation costs of the protection components required are to be compared with the savings from greater reliability of the telecommunication services and lower maintenance and repair costs. Optimum choice must be based on balancing minimum costs against maximal operational efficiency of the network. 3.1 Risk Analysis The risk, defined in [1] as the probable average annual loss in a and in connected telephone service lines due to lightning flashes depend on : The annual number of lightning flashes influencing the target and the connected telephone service lines. The probability of damage by one of the influencing lightning flashes. The mean amount of consequential loss. Lightning flashes influencing the may be divided into Flashes terminating on the. Flashes terminating near the direct to connected telephone service lines or near the telephone lines. S2 S4 S3 S1 S3 S4 Telephone service lines Equipment Fig. 1 Different sources of disturbances such as lightning discharge that influences on telecommunication system.

Proceedings of the 2007 WSEAS Int. Conference on Circuits, Systems, Signal and s, Gold Coast, Australia, January 17-19, 2007 218 Lightning influencing the telephone service lines may be divided into. Flashes terminating on the telephone service lines. Flashes terminating near the service or direct to a structure connected to the service. The purpose of risk analysis as described by [1] is to reduce the expected risk of damage (R p ) due to lightning to a value which is equal to or lower than the tolerable risk of damage (R a ). 3.2 Configuration of the telecommunication site and networks under investigation. A site located in Singburi province, Thailand, is selected for the risk assessment of damages due to lightning discharges. The site composed of a center with physical connection via telephone service lines to subscribers installations and with physical connection via ac power lines to the Utility in Singburi Province, Thailand is given in Fig. 2. 3.3 Sources of Damage under Consideration Sources of damage due to lightning discharges to a site under investigation can be divided to four main contributing factors which include: 1. Direct strikes to the site. 2. Nearby strikes to ground. 3. Lightning discharges to or in the vicinity of incoming telephone and ac power supply cables. 4. Direct discharges to adjacent antenna masts with metallic connection to the site. 3.4 Calculation of Frequency of damage (F) Risk areas for the telecommunication System under investigation shown in table 1 and may be defined as the areas shown in Fig.3. Lightning discharges confined to these areas are assumed to damage itself or at least the installed electronic equipment inside. A 1 = Equivalent risk area for direct strikes the. A 2 = Risk area for discharges to ground nearby the effect the network by resistive and inductive coupling. A 3 = Risk area for direct strikes to adjacent antenna masts, with metallic connection to the network A 4 = Risk area for incoming telephone service lines. A 5 = Risk area for incoming power lines. The sum of the areas gives the total risk area for the site and corresponds to the average number of damages every year, F, at a normalized lightning intensity N g of 1 flash to ground per km 2 and year. Regarding the local lightning flash density, the number of yearly prospective number of damages, F, is expressed by formula (1) F N g (A 1 p 1 +A 2 p 2+A 3 p 3 +A 4 p 4+A 5 p 5 ) (1) where the different values of probability factor p depend on the existing or planned protective measure, which decrease the probability of damages. The five terms represent damages caused by 1. direct strike to the 2. nearby strikes to ground 3. direct discharges to antenna tower with metallic connection to and 4. lightning discharges to or in the vicinity of incoming telephone service lines. 5. lightning discharges to or in the vicinity of incoming power lines. The value of lightning ground flash density is calculated by using the following approximate formula [2] N g = 0.04 T d 1.25 per km 2 and year (2) where Td = 70 is the average number of thunderstorm registered per year. 3.5 Risk of damage, R The risk R that a site will suffer serious damages can be estimated to which is simplified to For t = 1 year and F << 1 R = (1 e F T ) δ (3) R = F δ = Σ F i δ i (4) The factor δ is determined with respect to the prospective consequent damages in relation to the full hardware value of the equipment and to the effects of a total loss of service.

Proceedings of the 2007 WSEAS Int. Conference on Circuits, Systems, Signal and s, Gold Coast, Australia, January 17-19, 2007 219 18 km. Telephone service lines networks Antenna mast Power substation To subscribers Fig. 2 Configuration of a telecommunication and networks under investigation. Power cables A5 Telecom Telecom cables Telephone service lines Antenna tower Antenna mart A2 A1 A4 A3 Fig. 3 Risk areas for lightning discharges 3.6 Probability Factor p The probability factor p according to [3] can be divided into two parts. The first part associated with the natural protective characteristic of the installation ( material, aerial or underground network). The second part associated with the specific protective measures provided at the or cabinet interface and such installed in the internal and external network (surge protective devices, cable shields and isolation techniques). The values of probability factors p 1, p 2, p 3, p 4 and p 5 are extracted from [3] corresponding to the network under investigation are 0.1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.01 and 0.01 respectively. 3.7 Results of the risk analysis The aim of the risk analysis in this paper is to study the effect from the power supply lines on the number of expected damages due to lightning discharges. The existing site is physically connected to ac power supply originating from a substation. However, the medium voltage distribution lines also supply other loads on the same route in the vicinity of the site. This extends the line to a further length of 18 kilometers contributing to a very significant additional risk area. With the information on parameters of the above system the risk for loss of service R loss and the risk for physical damages to site R damage are estimated and the results are shown in table 2. The calculated risk level is comparatively higher than the tolerable risk of damage as recommended by ITU-T K.39 [3]. By reducing the power cables route redundancy by a decrement of 3 kilometers interval starting from 18 km. length the resultant total number of damages per year and the number of damages due to lightning discharges in the vicinity of power cables (F power ) are found to vary as shown in Fig. 4(a). the frequency of damages due to the power cables in proportion to the total number of damages per year are found to reduce considerably as shown in table 3 and Fig. 4(b). 4 Conclusions Assessment of the risk of damages to a site presented in this paper is calculated based on condition that the site is not provided with any

Proceedings of the 2007 WSEAS Int. Conference on Circuits, Systems, Signal and s, Gold Coast, Australia, January 17-19, 2007 220 particular protective measures. Inherent natural protective parts of the construction of the or in the outside cable plant can offer some possible reduction in the penetrating fields and currents. The likelihood that damage should occur is expected to be significantly lower than in the theoretical case. The analysis shows that route length reduction and implementation of SPDs at the interface of the power supply cables and the entrance of the existing site can significantly reduce the total number of damages per year. Table 1. Risk areas for the telecommunication System under investigation F ( damages / year ) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 length ( km) (a) Ftotal Fpower Risk areas km 2 A 1 0 (cover by A 2 ) A 2 0.108686 A 3 0.21029 A 4 45.097205 A 5 48.296089 F ( damages / year ) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Ftotal Fpower Table 2. Risk for loss of service and risk for physical damages to equipment in the existing telecommunication in Singburi Province, Thailand. R damage 0.8307 R loss 0.0113 Table 3. Number of damages due to the power line proportion to the total number of damages. Length of power line 3 6 9 12 15 18 (km) F total 1.69 2.18 2.66 3.15 3.64 4.12 F F power total F power 1.65 2.13 2.62 3.10 3.59 4.08.100% 97.2 97.9 98.3 98.5 98.7 98.9 References: [1] IEC 62305 2, Protection against lightning - Part 2: Risk management [2] IEC 61643-22, Low-voltage surge protective devices Part 22: Surge protective devices connected to telecommunications and signalling networks Selection and application principles, Reference number CEI/IEC 61643-22:2004. 0.0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 length ( km) (b) Fig. 4 Variation of number of damages per year (a) without SPDs (b) with SPDs at the incoming lines of low-voltage power of telecommunication [3] ITU-T Recommendation K.39, Risk assessment of damages to telecommunication sites due to lightning discharges. [4] IEC 1662 Technical Report, Assessment of the risk of damage due to lightning. [5] Z.Janklovics, The Place and Role of Power Supply in the Overvoltage Protection and Risk Assessment of Damages to Sites due to Lightning Discharges HTC PKI s Development Institute, H- 1456 P.O.B. 2. Budapest, IX. Zombori u. 1. Hungary. [6] ITU-T Recommendation K.20, Resistibility of telecommunication switching equipment to overvoltages and overcurrents. [7] ITU-T Recommendation K.40, Protection against LEMP in telecommunications centres.