Quality Report Generated with version

Similar documents
Quality Report Generated with version

Near-Infrared Dataset. 101 out of 101 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled

28 out of 28 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled. 0.02% relative difference between initial and optimized internal camera parameters

Quality Report Generated with Pix4Dmapper Pro version

Laptop Generated Quality Report Phase 1 Time 00h:26m:45s Phase 2 Time 02h:30m:06s Phase 3 Time 01h:20m:19s Total Time All phases 04h:17m:10s

Quality Report Generated with Pro version

Paris-Le Bourget Airport. 557 out of 557 images calibrated (100%), all images enabled

Quality Report Generated with Pix4Ddiscovery version

Quality Report Generated with Pro version

Processed :36:54 Average Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) Time for Initial Processing (without report)

Quality Report Generated with Postflight Terra 3D version

Quality Report Generated with Pix4Dmapper Pro version

Getting Started with Pix4D for Agriculture 3.3

TRAINING MATERIAL HOW TO OPTIMIZE ACCURACY WITH CORRELATOR3D

2. POINT CLOUD DATA PROCESSING

Tutorial (Beginner level): Orthomosaic and DEM Generation with Agisoft PhotoScan Pro 1.3 (with Ground Control Points)

Geometry of Aerial photogrammetry. Panu Srestasathiern, PhD. Researcher Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (Public Organization)

Tutorial (Beginner level): Orthomosaic and DEM Generation with Agisoft PhotoScan Pro 1.3 (without Ground Control Points)

Photogrammetric Performance of an Ultra Light Weight Swinglet UAV

Drone2Map: an Introduction. October 2017

Drone2Map for ArcGIS: Bring Drone Imagery into ArcGIS. Will

Camera Drones Lecture 3 3D data generation

Accuracy Assessment of an ebee UAS Survey

Digital Photogrammetric System. Version 5.3 USER GUIDE. Processing of UAV data

Producing Ortho Imagery In ArcGIS. Hong Xu, Mingzhen Chen, Ringu Nalankal

GEOSYSTEMS... 2 UAV Workflow ERDAS IMAGINE UAV Feature Overview Section ERDAS IMAGINE UAV Feature... 2

Introduction. Acute3D S.A.S. WTC Valbonne Sophia Antipolis. 120 route des Macarons.

Multiray Photogrammetry and Dense Image. Photogrammetric Week Matching. Dense Image Matching - Application of SGM

Accuracy Assessment of POS AVX 210 integrated with the Phase One ixu150

Aerial Triangulation Report 2016 City of Nanaimo Aerial Mapping Project

٥...: (Picture element) Pixel ٧...:

STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE. To produce high-quality results, consider the following best practices before starting processing:

CORRELATOR3D TM Whitepaper

SimActive and PhaseOne Workflow case study. By François Riendeau and Dr. Yuri Raizman Revision 1.0

DENSE 3D POINT CLOUD GENERATION FROM UAV IMAGES FROM IMAGE MATCHING AND GLOBAL OPTIMAZATION

The raycloud A Vision Beyond the Point Cloud

P h a s e O n e i X U - RS A c c u r a c y A n a l y s i s. T h e f o r e f r o n t o f a e r i a l p h o t o g r a p h y

Generating highly accurate 3D data using a sensefly exom drone

EVOLUTION OF POINT CLOUD

A step by step introduction to TopoFlight

ifp Universität Stuttgart Performance of IGI AEROcontrol-IId GPS/Inertial System Final Report

UAV data acquisition and processing

Structure from Motion (SfM) Photogrammetry Data Exploration and Processing Manual

Best Practices for Managing Aerial and UAS Frame Imagery. Cody Benkelman, Jie Zhang

A New Protocol of CSI For The Royal Canadian Mounted Police

EVALUATION OF WORLDVIEW-1 STEREO SCENES AND RELATED 3D PRODUCTS

Automated Air Photo Orthorectification and Mosaicking Geomatica 2015 Tutorial

VOLUME COMPUTATION OF A STOCKPILE A STUDY CASE COMPARING GPS AND UAV MEASUREMENTS IN AN OPEN PIT QUARRY

CONTENTS. Quick Start Guide V1.0

FOUR-BAND THERMAL MOSAICKING: A NEW METHOD TO PROCESS THERMAL IMAGERY FROM UAV FLIGHT YICHEN YANG YALE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Exterior Orientation Parameters

Simply powerful. Pix4Dmapper features the raycloud. Read more on Next generation aerial image processing software

Multiview Photogrammetry 3D Virtual Geology for everyone

USE OF VERTICAL AERIAL IMAGES FOR SEMI-OBLIQUE MAPPING

Assessing 3D Point Cloud Fidelity of UAS SfM Software Solutions Over Varying Terrain

AIRPHEN. The Multispectral camera from HIPHEN

USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (DRONE/FLYCAM) TECHNOLOGY IN SURVEY WORK OF PORTCOAST

Phase One ixa-r-180 Aerial Triangulation

Ingesting, Managing, and Using UAV (Drone) Imagery in the ArcGIS Platform

Extracting Elevation from Air Photos

2018 SimActive Inc. All rights reserved.

Efficient Processing of UAV Projects

Agisoft PhotoScan Change Log

PERFORMANCE OF LARGE-FORMAT DIGITAL CAMERAS

UAS Campus Survey Project

COMPARISON OF LASER SCANNING, PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND SfM-MVS PIPELINE APPLIED IN STRUCTURES AND ARTIFICIAL SURFACES

Calibration of IRS-1C PAN-camera

Reality Modeling Drone Capture Guide

Determining the Optimum Number of Ground Control Points for Obtaining High Precision Results Based on UAS Images

PROBLEMS AND LIMITATIONS OF SATELLITE IMAGE ORIENTATION FOR DETERMINATION OF HEIGHT MODELS

Unmanned Aerial Systems: A Look Into UAS at ODOT

Files Used in this Tutorial

Leica - Airborne Digital Sensors (ADS80, ALS60) Update / News in the context of Remote Sensing applications

Chapters 1 9: Overview

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHOD:

Data Acquisition, Leica Scan Station 2, Park Avenue and 70 th Street, NY

arxiv: v1 [cs.cv] 28 Sep 2018

Sasanka Madawalagama Geoinformatics Center Asian Institute of Technology Thailand

Geomatica OrthoEngine Orthorectifying VEXCEL UltraCam Data

Photogrammetry: DTM Extraction & Editing

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF DEM OBTAINED FROM SATELLITE IMAGES SPOT-5 AND TK-350

MASI: Modules for Aerial and Satellite Imagery

Introduction. Prerequisites. Ballbar - QC20-W - Analysis LAST UPDATED: 12/01/2018

On Grid: Tools and Techniques to Place Reality Data in a Geographic Coordinate System

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOLUTIONS OF NON-STANDARD PHOTOGRAMMETRIC BLOCKS INTRODUCTION

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF COMBINED IMU/GNSS DATA FOR DIRECT GEOREFERENCING IN THE CONTEXT OF UAV-BASED MAPPING

Chapters 1 7: Overview

Chapters 1 7: Overview

New Features In TerraPhoto. What s New in Terrasolid v011? Webinar 15 February Feb 2011 What's New in Terrasolid v011? 2

Chapters 1 5. Photogrammetry: Definition, introduction, and applications. Electro-magnetic radiation Optics Film development and digital cameras

The use of different data sets in 3-D modelling

3DReshaper Version 2016 MR1 Beginner s Guide Image

LiDAR & Orthophoto Data Report

3DReshaper Help 2017 MR1. 3DReshaper Beginner's Guide. Image

3DReshaper Help DReshaper Beginner's Guide. Image

Digital Photogrammetric System. Version 6.3 USER MANUAL. Aerial triangulation

PRISM geometric Cal/Val and DSM performance

TRIMBLE BUSINESS CENTER PHOTOGRAMMETRY MODULE

UAV s in Surveying: Integration/processes/deliverables A-Z. 3Dsurvey.si

UAS to GIS Utilizing a low-cost Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) for Coastal Erosion Monitoring

Transcription:

Quality Report Generated with version 3.3.67 Important: Click on the different icons for: Help to analyze the results in the Quality Report Additional information about the feature Click here for additional tips to analyze the Quality Report Summary Project Processed Camera Model Name Average Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) thermomap - solar pannel 2015-Mar-12 15:35:33 thermomap_9.0_640x512 (Thermal IR) 14.23 cm / 5.6 in Area Covered 0.0779 km2 / 7.7938 ha / 0.0301 sq. mi. / 19.2688 acres WGS84 WGS84 / UTM zone 32N full Aerial nadir 1 optimize externals and all internals 03m:00s Image Coordinate System Output Coordinate System Processing Type Feature Extraction Image Scale Camera Model Parameter Optimization Time for Initial Processing (without report) Quality Check Images median of 898 keypoints per image Dataset 292 out of 293 images calibrated (99%), 782 images disabled Camera Optimization 2.85% relative difference between initial and final focal length Matching median of 537.857 matches per calibrated image Georeferencing no 3D GCP Preview Figure 1: Orthomosaic and the corresponding sparse Digital Surface Model (DSM) before densification.

Calibration Details Number of Calibrated Images 292 out of 1075 Number of Geolocated Images 1075 out of 1075 Initial Image Positions Figure 2: Top view of the initial image position. The green line follows the position of the images in time starting from the large blue dot. Computed Image/GCPs/Manual Tie Points Positions

Figure 3: Offset between initial (blue dots) and computed (green dots) image positions as well as the offset between the GCPs initial positions (blue crosses) and their computed positions (green crosses) in the top-view (XY plane), front-view (XZ plane), and side-view (YZ plane). Red dots indicate disabled or uncalibrated images. Overlap

Number of overlapping images: 1 2 3 4 5+ Figure 4: Number of overlapping images computed for each pixel of the orthomosaic. Red and yellow areas indicate low overlap for which poor results may be generated. Green areas indicate an overlap of over 5 images for every pixel. Good quality results will be generated as long as the number of keypoint matches is also sufficient for these areas (see Figure 5 for keypoint matches). Bundle Block Adjustment Details Number of 2D Keypoint Observations for Bundle Block Adjustment 162560 Number of 3D Points for Bundle Block Adjustment 46870 Mean Reprojection Error [pixels] 0.282475 Internal Camera Parameters thermomap_9.0_640x512 (Thermal IR). Sensor Dimensions: 10.9 [mm] x 8.7 [mm] EXIF ID: senseflythermal_0.0_640x512 Focal Length Principal Point x Principal Point y R1 R2 R3 T1 T2 Initial Values 558.824 [pixel] 9.500 [mm] 320.000 [pixel] 5.440 [mm] 256.000 [pixel] 4.352 [mm] -0.294 0.104-0.019 0.000 0.000 Optimized Values 542.859 [pixel] 9.229 [mm] 319.488 [pixel] 5.431 [mm] 257.795 [pixel] 4.383 [mm] -0.298 0.115-0.028 0.001-0.002 2D Keypoints Table Number of 2D Keypoints per Image Number of Matched 2D Keypoints per Image Median 898 538 Min 562 194 Max 1322 991 Mean 911 557 3D Points from 2D Keypoint Matches In 2 Images 25865 Number of 3D Points Observed

In 3 Images 8421 In 4 Images 4030 In 5 Images 2328 In 6 Images 1593 In 7 Images 1070 In 8 Images 812 In 9 Images 644 In 10 Images 470 In 11 Images 376 In 12 Images 270 In 13 Images 209 In 14 Images 182 In 15 Images 130 In 16 Images 97 In 17 Images 92 In 18 Images 62 In 19 Images 46 In 20 Images 27 In 21 Images 35 In 22 Images 29 In 23 Images 19 In 24 Images 18 In 25 Images 12 In 26 Images 6 In 27 Images 4 In 28 Images 5 In 29 Images 7 In 30 Images 2 In 31 Images 1 In 32 Images 2 In 33 Images 1 In 36 Images 1 In 37 Images 2 In 39 Images 1 In 44 Images 1 3D Points from 2D Keypoint Matches

Number of matches 25 70 141 212 282 353 424 494 565 636 Figure 5: Top view of the image computed positions with a link between matching images. The darkness of the links indicates the number of matched 2D keypoints between the images. Bright links indicate weak links and require manual tie points or more images. Geolocation Details Absolute Geolocation Variance Min Error [m] Max Error [m] Geolocation Error X [%] Geolocation Error Y [%] Geolocation Error Z [%] - -5.68 0.34 0.34 0.00-5.68-4.54 0.00 2.05 0.00-4.54-3.41 0.00 3.42 0.00-3.41-2.27 1.37 4.45 0.00-2.27-1.14 4.45 11.30 8.90-1.14 0.00 44.18 27.74 41.78 0.00 1.14 44.18 28.08 39.73 1.14 2.27 4.11 9.93 7.88 2.27 3.41 1.37 8.90 1.71 3.41 4.54 0.00 3.42 0.00 4.54 5.68 0.00 0.34 0.00 5.68-0.00 0.00 0.00 Mean -0.011407-0.051550-0.000175 Sigma 0.859653 2.013749 0.897636 RMS Error 0.859729 2.014409 0.897636 Min Error and Max Error represent geolocation error intervals between -1.5 and 1.5 times the maximum accuracy of all the images. Columns X, Y, Z show the percentage of images with geolocation errors within the predefined error intervals. The geolocation error is the difference between the intial and computed image positions. Note that the image geolocation errors do not correspond to the accuracy of the observed 3D points. Geotag Orientational Variance RMS [degree] Omega 4.877134 Phi 5.007280 Kappa 6.719228 Geolocation RMS error of the orientation angles given by the difference between the initial and computed image orientation angles. Point Cloud Densification details Summary Processing Type aerial nadir Image Scale multiscale, 1/2 (half image size, default) Point Density optimal Minimum Number of Matches 3 Use Densification Area yes Use Annotations yes Time for Densification (without report and 3D textured mesh) 02m:25s Results Number of 3D Densified Points 368757 Average Density (per m 3 ) 1.31