CNSC Management Response to CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations INFO-0825

Similar documents
nuclearsafety.gc.ca Implications of the Fukushima Daiichi Accidents for the New Builds Design Requirements in Canada

IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety

Status of Cyber Security Implementation at Canadian NPPs

Capacity building in the IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety

The Fukushima accident Consequences for Japan and France

CNSC Presentation to the Federal Agency for Nuclear Control

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE AND RESPONSIBLE USE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation ( NERC ) hereby submits

Protecting Canada s Nuclear Industry THE

Safety of Nuclear Installations

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Event Actions

IAEA Activities under the Nuclear Safety Action Plan

GNSSN. Global Nuclear Safety and Security Network

Technical Report REVISION SHEET. STUDSVIK UK LIMITED ENSREG Stress Tests : Final Report NO PROTECTIVE MARKING NO PROTECTIVE MARKING.

CIP Standards Development Overview

Joint Statement of the Eminent Persons Group for the 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit

Nuclear Safety and Security in Brief

INTEGRATED REGULATORY REVIEW SERVICE (IRRS)

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/62/L.30 and Add.1)]

Knowledge Management in Licensing & Design Bases. Thomas Koshy, Head Nuclear Power Technology Development Division of Nuclear Power

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Fifth Committee (A/61/592/Add.4)]

UAE s National Integrated Planning for nuclear power infrastructure development

Nuclear Security. Resolution adopted on 30 September 2016 during the tenth plenary meeting

Jacques Régaldo, Chairman of WANO

Safety of Nuclear Installations

A Nuclear Security Regime in Japan: Enhancement Efforts & Global Contributions

Public Safety Canada. Audit of the Business Continuity Planning Program

Cybersecurity Presidential Policy Directive Frequently Asked Questions. kpmg.com

International cooperation on Nuclear Safety, Emergency Preparedness, and Response in East and Southeast Asia

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 14 December [without reference to a Main Committee (A/61/L.44 and Add.1)]

Nuclear Safety and Security in Brief

Electricity Sub-Sector Coordinating Council Charter FINAL DISCUSSION DRAFT 7/9/2013

International Atomic Energy Agency Meeting the Challenge of the Safety- Security Interface

IAEA Perspective: The Framework for the Security of Radioactive Material and Associated Facilities

Reviewed by ADM(RS) in accordance with the Access to Information Act. Information UNCLASSIFIED.

Multilateral Arrangements in Safety, Licensing & Regulations Capacity Building for Nuclear Safety and Security

OPG Comments on REGDOC-1.1.5, Licence Application Guide: Small Modular Reactor Facilities

MNsure Privacy Program Strategic Plan FY

Cybersecurity. Quality. security LED-Modul. basis. Comments by the electrical industry on the EU Cybersecurity Act. manufacturer s declaration

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL MANUAL CHAPTER 0609

Promoting accountability and transparency of multistakeholder partnerships for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda

Progress of the UAE Nuclear Power Program -Regulator s Perspective

Canada Life Cyber Security Statement 2018

IT Governance Framework at KIT

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/60/488/Add.3)]

NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION CORPORATE PLAN TO

STRATEGY ATIONAL. National Strategy. for Critical Infrastructure. Government

CHARTER OUR MISSION OUR OBJECTIVES OUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Audit Report. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)

Global Nuclear Safety and Security Regime

GC0102 Mod Title: EU Connection Codes GB Implementation Mod 3

TURNING STRATEGIES INTO ACTION DISASTER MANAGEMENT BUREAU STRATEGIC PLAN

UAE Ambassador Alkaabi led the UAE delegation during the Nuclear Security Conference

Performance- Based Approach to the Security of Radioactive Sealed Sources: A Canadian Perspective

Chapter 18 SaskPower Managing the Risk of Cyber Incidents 1.0 MAIN POINTS

Nuclear Criticality Safety RD-327

IAEA Programme on Instrumentation and Control System Design and Engineering for Operating NPPs

COMMENTARY. Federal Banking Agencies Propose Enhanced Cyber Risk Management Standards

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EXPORTERS PRINCIPLES OF CONDUCT. Tokyo, Japan January 16, 2013*

Subject: Audit Report 18-84, IT Disaster Recovery, California State University, Sacramento

REPORT 2015/186 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

ERO Enterprise Strategic Planning Redesign

DISCUSSION PAPER. Recommendations for a common UN System wide agenda on NCDs

IMO MEASURES TO ENHANCE MARITIME SECURITY. Outcome of the 2002 SOLAS conference. Information on the current work of the ILO

Policies and Procedures Date: February 28, 2012

WNA CORDEL Group and its Roadmap to greater Standardization of Reactor Designs

FERC Reliability Technical Conference Panel III: ERO Performance and Initiatives ESCC and the ES-ISAC

HARMONIZATION OF NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Signed on December 22 nd, 2015 MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY MINISTRY OF ECONOMY, TRADE AND INDUSTRY

Government Resolution No of February 15, Resolution: Advancing National Regulation and Governmental Leadership in Cyber Security

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations

2014 ITU Plenipotentiary Conference PP-14 SNAPSHOT OF SOME OF THE KEY ISSUES

The contribution of ETSON to improved emergency preparedness in the light of the Fukushima NPS accident

Number: USF System Emergency Management Responsible Office: Administrative Services

FORUM LOAD DESPATCHERS (FOLD)

Subject: Audit Report 16-50, IT Disaster Recovery, California State University, Fresno

certification.setac.org Certification Contact of Environmental Risk Assessors Phone: certification.setac.

ASME Section III New Developments

REPORT ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF USERS OF SATELLITE DATA TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (SATCOM FORUM)

Notice to Members. Branch Office Definition. Executive Summary. Questions/Further Information AUGUST 2002

History of NERC August 2013

Client Services Procedure Manual

Pakistan's Strategic Export Controls (Latest Developments)

Hazard Management Cayman Islands

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office SOP 1027 LU

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Stakeholder Feedback on a pcodr Expert Review Committee Initial Recommendation (Provincial Advisory Group [PAG])

Due Diligence Checklist #20

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Security techniques Information security risk management

Building & Housing Update

LVTS RULE 11 CHANGE MANAGEMENT, TESTING AND CERTIFICATION 2018 CANADIAN PAYMENTS ASSOCIATION

Nuclear Security Governance Experts Group Workshop on Improving Nuclear Security Regime Cohesion Asan Institute Seoul, July

Raidis Zemdegs WNA/CORDEL

Engineering and Technical Risk Management Solutions

ISO/IEC JTC 1 N

GUIDANCE ON THE SECURITY ASSESSMENT OF GENERIC NEW NUCLEAR REACTOR DESIGNS

The Global Nuclear Safety and Security Network. GNSSN Governance Plan

Joint ICTP-IAEA School of Nuclear Energy Management November 2012

EDF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE: FROM NUCLEAR PHYSICS TO MEDIA ISSUES.

History of NERC December 2012

TVA Response to the Fukushima Event and Lessons Learned from Recent Natural Disasters

Transcription:

CNSC Management Response to CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations INFO-0825 October 2011

CNSC Management Response to CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2011 Catalogue number CC172-77/1-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-19521-6 Published by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Catalogue number INFO-0825 Extracts from this document may be reproduced for individual use without permission provided the source is fully acknowledged. However, reproduction in whole or in part for other purposes requires prior written permission from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Également publié en français sous le titre de : Réponse de la direction aux recommandations du Groupe de travail de la CCSN sur Fukushima Document availability This document can be viewed on the CNSC Web site at nuclearsafety.gc.ca. To order a printed copy of the document in English or French, please contact: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 280 Slater Street P.O. Box 1046, Station B Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 CANADA Tel.: 613-995-5894 or 1-800-668-5284 (in Canada only) Facsimile: 613-995-5086 E-mail: info@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca Web site: nuclearsafety.gc.ca

CNSC Management Response to the CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations INFO-0825 October 2011

Message from the Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations Officer The CNSC Fukushima Task Force Report constitutes the Canadian stress test applied to Canadian operating nuclear reactors. The results of this stress test confirm the safe operation of nuclear power reactors in Canada. This proposed CNSC Management Response to the CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations outlines the framework that the CNSC intends to follow in implementing the recommendations of the Task Force in a timely and transparent manner. The framework builds upon the conclusions and recommendations of the Task Force s review of the Canadian nuclear power plant operators responses to the CNSC request, under subsection 12(2) of the General Nuclear Safety and Control Regulations, to reexamine the safety cases of their nuclear power plants. Many of these recommendations were already being considered and implemented by the CNSC and licensees as part of normal regulatory oversight. I accept the conclusions and recommendations of the Task Force report. I believe that the proposed improvements will further strengthen the safety case of Canadian nuclear power plants. Ramzi Jammal Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations Officer Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission i

CNSC Management Response to the CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations Overview On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake, followed by a devastating tsunami, struck Japan. The combined impact of the earthquake and tsunami on the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant caused a severe nuclear accident. In response to these events, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) established the CNSC Fukushima Task Force (the Task Force ) to evaluate operational, technical and regulatory implications for Canadian nuclear power plants. On September 30, 2011, the Task Force completed its review of the lessons learned from the accident and presented its findings in the CNSC Fukushima Task Force Report. The report particularly emphasizes: the capability of Canadian nuclear power plants to withstand conditions similar to those that triggered the Fukushima nuclear accident emergency preparedness and response in Canada the effectiveness of the CNSC s regulatory framework The Task Force concluded that Canadian nuclear power plants are safe and pose a very small risk to the health and safety of Canadians and the environment. The Task Force made 13 recommendations to further enhance the safety of nuclear power plants in Canada. These are presented in section 10 of the Task Force report. Recommendations For the purpose of this Management Response, the Task Force recommendations can be divided into two broad categories: Technical and operational recommendations, which pertain to design and operational enhancements to strengthen reactor defence in depth and technical cooperation at the international level. Regulatory recommendations, which require Commission approval to amend the CNSC regulatory framework and processes and the Commission approval and direction to enhance emergency preparedness. Technical and operational recommendations The Task Force confirmed that Canadian nuclear power plants are safe and have a strong design relying on multiple layers of defence. Nevertheless, the Task Force recommended strengthening the safety case of nuclear power plants as it relates to the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident. The review findings, upon which these recommendations are based, have been determined through comparison with the Nuclear Power Plant Safety Review Criteria. These criteria exceed the applicable requirements and expectations of the current CNSC regulatory framework. A mapping of the recommendations to each finding is included as Appendix D of the CNSC Task Force report. These recommendations are technical and operational in nature, and CNSC staff will implement them through normal regulatory oversight of the current CANDU fleet. Consequently, CNSC management has been instructed by the Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations Officer to address each recommendation in the form of a comprehensive action plan that details measures required of licensees to strengthen reactor defence in depth. 1

CNSC Management Response to the CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations Regulatory recommendations The Task Force performed a detailed review of the CNSC regulatory framework and processes and confirmed that the Canadian regulatory framework is strong, comprehensive and effectively applied to the whole range of plant conditions. In recognition of the results of this review, the Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations Officer will refer these recommendations to the Commission as part of the detailed CNSC Action Plan. In addition, the Task Force concluded that the emergency preparedness and response measures in Canada, both onsite and offsite, are adequate. Nevertheless, the Task Force identified further improvements through streamlining emergency preparedness between onsite and offsite authorities. This conclusion is accepted by the Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations Officer, and this recommendation is referred to the Commission for direction. Implementation The implementation plan of the technical and operational recommendations will consist of action items that take into consideration differences in reactor designs and locations, and that identify lead CNSC directorates, completion dates and closure criteria. The regulatory recommendations that deal with amendments to existing licences or CNSC regulations and regulatory documents will be referred to the Commission for approval or direction. This Management Response establishes the following general guidance for implementing these recommendations, consistent with risk-informed considerations and related cost-benefit implications: Short term by December 31, 2012 Medium term by December 31, 2013 Long term by December 31, 2015 The public and stakeholders are invited to provide their written comments on the Task Force Report and proposed Management Response. This input will be incorporated into a comprehensive CNSC Action Plan that will be presented to the Commission at a public Commission meeting on February 15, 2012. Next Steps To ensure transparency and public input to the process, the following actions will be undertaken: October 28, 2011 December 1, 2011 Posting of the Task Force report and CNSC Management Response for public comment December 15, 2011 January 20, 2012 (tentative) Posting of Commission Member Document (CMD) for public comment on the: CNSC Action Plan, and Disposition Report of comments received from the first public and stakeholder review 2

CNSC Management Response to the CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations January 20, 2012 February 8, 2012 (tentative) Disposition of comments received from the second public and stakeholder review and revisions to the CNSC Action Plan as required February 15, 2012 (tentative) Commission public meeting on the revised CNSC Action Plan Conclusion This CNSC Management Response describes the basis upon which the Task Force recommendations will be implemented in a timely and transparent manner. These actions, together with comments from the public and stakeholders, demonstrate CNSC management s commitment to ensure the robustness of Canada s regulatory framework and safety of nuclear power plants in Canada. In addition, the CNSC has agreed to undergo international peer reviews, first by participating in an Integrated Regulatory Review Service mission led by the International Atomic Energy Agency and, subsequently, by fulfilling its obligation to the Convention on Nuclear Safety by submitting a national report on the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident for an Extraordinary Meeting to be held in Vienna, Austria, in August 2012. 3

CNSC Management Response to the CNSC Fukushima Task Force Recommendations Acknowledgements I commend the hard work and dedication of the CNSC Fukushima Task Force members who worked diligently and relentlessly in preparing this report to ensure that the safety of the public and the environment is never compromised: Chair: Greg Rzentkowski Director General, Directorate of Power Reactor Regulation Vice-Chair: Gerry Frappier Technical Leads: Tom Schaubel Phil Webster Pat Hawley Scientific Secretary: Hatem Khouaja Project Management: Albert Thibert Technical Specialists Sanja Simic David Newland Chantal Morin Chris Harwood Luc Sigouin Director General, Directorate of Assessment and Analysis Director, Directorate of Power Reactor Regulation Director, Directorate of Power Reactor Regulation Director, Directorate of Assessment and Analysis Technical Advisor, Directorate of Power Reactor Regulation Senior Regulatory Program Officer, Directorate of Power Reactor Regulation Technical Specialist, Directorate of Assessment and Analysis (severe accidents) Director, Directorate of Regulatory Improvement and Major Projects (requirements for new builds) Technical Specialist, Directorate of Assessment and Analysis (probabilistic safety assessment) Technical Specialist, Directorate of Assessment and Analysis (deterministic safety analysis) Director, Directorate of Security and Safeguards (emergency response) Special appreciation is also directed to the numerous CNSC staff members, in a wide range of disciplines, who provided expert advice and timely assistance to the Task Force members. 4