You Could Kill Someone and Go to Jail for Talking or Texting While Driving California Vehicle Code Sections 23123, 23124

Similar documents
An ordinance adding Section to CHAPTER 28, MOTOR VEHICLES AND

ULCT Local Officials Day January 30, 2019

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

CHART BOOK: HAND-HELD MOBILE DEVICE USE TRENDS FOR MISSISSIPPI ADULTS

DISTRACTION & INJURY: HOLDING BACK THE TIDE DISCLOSURE & ACCREDITATION

Road and Street Maintenance Supervisors Conference

CITY OF DUBUQUE ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY REVISED OCTOBER 24, 2011 RETROACTIVE TO JANUARY 1, 2011

PRESS RELEASE. Manteca Police Department to Step Up Enforcement for Distracted Drivers

If you knew the #1 killer in American teenagers, would you try to stop it?

Distracted Driving Social Media Posts

Distracted Driving Accident Claims Involving Mobile Devices Special Considerations and New Frontiers in Legal Liability

AVOID DISTRACTIONS WHILE DRIVING

Distracted Driving. Applicable Regulations. Introduction/Overview

ITSMR RESEARCH NOTE EFFECTS OF CELL PHONE USE AND OTHER DRIVER DISTRACTIONS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY: 2006 UPDATE. Introduction SUMMARY

I MINA'TRENT AI UNU NA LIHESLATURAN GUAHAN 2011 (FIRST) Regular Session

Distracted Driving Accident Claims Involving Mobile Devices Special Considerations and New Frontiers in Legal Liability

Alaska no no all drivers primary. Arizona no no no not applicable. primary: texting by all drivers but younger than

WHAT CAN BE DONE? MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNERS ASSOCIATION 2011 CONFERENCE JIM SANTILLI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AT THE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION

Texting and driving. Texting and Driving Report Angel Reyes

Distracted Work. Kentucky Crushed Stone Association - Annual Safety & Education Seminar February Robert Jameson, Central Mine Services, Inc.

There is Nothing Wrong with. Texting and Driving, Right?

Georgia Struck-By Alliance presents Highway Work Zone Safety Stand Down. Work Zone Safety: We re All in This Together

CELLULAR TELEPHONE USE POLICY

Sample Paper APA Style

VEHICLE SAFETY. MBMA Lunch and Learn Webinar December 13 th 12:00PM CST Presenter: MBMA Safety Committee

ITSMR Research Note KEY FINDINGS. Crash Analyses: Ticket Analyses:

Instructions For Cell Phone Use While Driving In Illinois Law Prohibiting

Amy Schick NHTSA, Occupant Protection Division April 7, 2011

Preventing Back-Over. Distracted Driving: Incidences. June 2018 Presented by Tom Deutsch Integrated Loss Control, Inc.

Distracted Driving & Voice-to-Text Overview. Christine Yager Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Current prohibitions:

UC Berkeley Research Reports

CELLULAR TELEPHONE USE POLICY

TEXTING WHILE DRIVING

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mobile, Alabama, is aware of growing

Distracted Driving. EMEA Claims Conference EMEA Claims Conference Rüschlikon, March 6th & 7th 2018 Marion Villalobos, Constanze Brand

Why driving while using hands-free cell phones is risky behavior. Drivers through Better Training

MSMC PRESENTS. Distracted Driving Laws in Michigan Talking to Our Kids. (800)

Cell Phones & Distracted Driving

Objectives DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Don t Drive Distracted. Attorney Joe Troy

Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance DISTRACTIVE DRIVING

environmental crime prosecution - the Netherlands -

Impact of Traffic Safety Laws Northeast Transportation Safety Conference October 25, 2017

PRESS RELEASE. Computer Forensic Investigations Explode For Chester County Law Enforcement

MLA Research Paper (Daly)

Washington Driver Survey Distracted Driving Attitudes & Behavior

Sgt. Scott Melander Woodbury Police Department

ITSMR Research Note. Crashes Involving Cell Phone Use and Distracted Driving KEY FINDINGS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION. Crash Analyses.

CRIME ANALYSIS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

Distracted Driving- A Review of Relevant Research and Latest Findings

SECTION 9 POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Arizona State Troopers Highway Patrol Division Sergeant John Paul Cartier

RESOLUTION DIGEST

Cell Phones & Distracted Driving

Distracted Driving: Avoid Becoming A Statistic

ORDINANCE NO. _ CITY OF LEOTI, KANSAS

Cellular Site Simulator Usage and Privacy

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 2 Filed 06/20/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA I. BACKGROUND

Current Status and Future Plan of HELP

Date of Next Review: May Cross References: Electronic Communication Systems- Acceptable Use policy (A.29) Highway Traffic Act

Instruction for completing Sentence Forms that Contain Macros

MLA Research Paper (Daly)

Study: Even hands-free devices prove too distracting for drivers

Instructions For Cell Phone Use In School Zone Arkansas Laws

NEWTON COUNTY OPEN RECORDS ACT POLICY

Persuasive Speech Outline

WIRELESS DEVICES: ACCEPTABLE USE AND GUIDELINES

STAFF REPORT. Evaluate the Use of Body Cameras

Safety and Security in a Digital Age. South Carolina Bar Convention Family Law Section January 22, 2010

City of Seattle. IT Policy. Internal Controls Over Voice Communications. Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor Bill Schrier, Chief Technology Officer

A CQE does not guarantee a license or a job

Nashville MTA: Distracted Driving Bob Baulsir. Metropolitan Transit Authority General Manager of Administration Nashville, TN

EXHIBIT 2. [Revisions to Division II of the San Francisco Transportation Code.] Resolution amending San Francisco Transportation Code, Division II, by

Along for the Ride Reducing Driver Distractions

Kentucky Wireless Information Network Service (Ky-WINS)

Cell Phone Use & Driving Impact on Employee Safety, Productivity and Employer Liability

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblywoman ANNETTE QUIJANO District 20 (Union)

Traffic Ticket Defense By Mark Sutherland READ ONLINE

Traffic Safety Facts Research Note

Waste Transportation Safety Program. New and Renewal Act 90 Authorization Online Greenport Application Instructions.

Presented by Michelle Ellison Director of INSafe & Marketing

Driver Policy For the Use of Mobile Phones

Matthew H. Brown Curriculum Vitae. Education

SOLUTION BRIEF. Video Changes the Future of Policing

MINDS ON SETTING THE STAGE. News in Review October 2014 Teacher Resource Guide DISTRACTED DRIVERS: License to Kill

Should Handheld Cell Phone Use While Driving Be Banned? By Jak Kimball

SAINT Voice. SAINT Police Systems White Paper. Increase Situation Awareness Reduce Distraction Limit Liability. June 1, 2013

Distracted Driving Enforcement in New York

MLA Research Paper (Levi)

WIRELESS DEVICES: ACCEPTABLE USE AND GUIDELINES

Student Volunteering Cardiff (SVC) Transport Policy. August 2004

Personal. Name Last: First: Middle: City: State: Zip: Contact numbers Home ( ) - Work ( ) - Other ( ) - Cell ( ) -

A GUIDE TO THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAIL

H. R To reduce unsolicited commercial electronic mail and to protect children from sexually oriented advertisements.

Please follow up with your references to ensure that each reference letter has been sent to the PFAC office signed, dated with business card attached.

A Case Study: 3D Laser Scanning and Ballistic Trajectory Analysis in Officer Involved Shooting

RUSSELL BOHSE.

Review of distracted driving factors. George Yannis, Associate Professor, NTUA

Transcription:

You Could Kill Someone and Go to Jail for Talking or Texting While Driving California Vehicle Code Sections 23123, 23124 You Could Kill Someone and Go to Jail for Talking or Texting While Driving California Vehicle Code Sections 23123, 23124 Haverhill, Mass., February 2011 Aaron Deveau was only 17 years old when he struck and killed Donald Bowley, a 55- year old father of three and critically injured the deceased man s girlfriend who was a passenger in the car Bowley had been driving. Aaron s attention wasn t focused on the road that day, it was focused on the 193 text messages he had been sending using his smartphone. One particular text cost a man his life. According to police investigators, the teenager had been texting a minute before the fatal crash and continued texting after the accident. By taking his eyes off the road, Aaron altered the course of his life and that of his victim for the worse. Forever. Deveau s case drew national attention. In June 2012, he became the first person at the time to be convicted under a stringent new Massachusetts law calling for severe punishment for anyone who causes injury or property damage while driving distracted due to reading, sending and receiving text messages. Deveau was convicted of both vehicular homicide and negligent operation, as well as several other traffic violations and was sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison. Additionally, Deveau s license to drive a vehicle was suspended for 15 years. Deveau must live the rest of his life with the burden of knowing he killed someone when he foolishly tried to text and drive at the same time a lesson he is certain never to forget, and hopefully will not repeat.

Newport Beach, California, August 2008 California is cracking down on texting while driving. Distracted driving could lead to vehicular manslaughter, which comes with severe penalties. Martin Bert Kuehl didn t see the light turn green at the intersection of Dover Drive and Westcliff Street in Newport Beach, Calif. on August 29, 2008. He also didn t see Martha Ovalle, a nanny, step into the crosswalk in front of his SUV. Kuehl was busy texting on his cellphone when the driver behind him honked the horn to get Kuehl s attention. Distracted by his text messaging, Kuehl stepped on the gas, striking Martha Ovalle and killing her. Though it was unknown to investigators called to the scene of the homicide why Ovalle was in the crosswalk illegally, California traffic laws state that a driver must give right of way to any pedestrian regardless. Kuehl admitted to Newport Beach police officers that he did not see Martha in the crosswalk when he hit her, although he also admitted he had an unobstructed view. In January 2009, Kuehl was found guilty of committing gross negligence and convicted of vehicular manslaughter. On April 9, 2009, Martin Bert Kuehl was sentenced to serve four years in prison for killing Martha while driving distracted due to texting on a mobile device. Using a Wireless Device while Driving in California The California legislature has enacted Vehicle Code Section 23123 and Vehicle Code Section 23123.5 in order to help decrease the frequency of talking, texting and emailing while driving. On July 1, 2008, California made it illegal for anyone over the age of 18 to use a wireless telephone while driving a motor vehicle, unless the device had hands free listening and talking features (i.e. Bluetooth). On January 1, 2009, it became illegal

for individuals to drive a vehicle while writing, sending or reading text messages, instant messages or emails. Drivers under the age of 18 are prohibited from using a wireless device for any reason while driving a motor vehicle (California Vehicle Code section 23124). Talking while Driving Penalties VC 23123 Vehicle Code Section 23123 prohibits a driver from talking on the phone in a vehicle unless the telephone is equipped with hands free talking and listening features. Using push to talk features is not allowed under current California law. A violation of the law is an infraction, punishable by a fine of $20 for a first offense and $50 for each subsequent offense. Additionally, these fines are subject to what is known as a penalty assessment meaning, the ultimate cost to you is much higher than $20 or $50. The penalty assessment can be as much as 260 percent of the base fine, which means you could have to pay as much as $52 for a first offense and $130 for each subsequent offense if you are convicted of violating the law. Exempt from Vehicle Code 23123 are emergency response personnel when acting in an official capacity, as well as to anyone calling for assistance from the police, fire department or another county or state agency in an emergency. While it is permissible to dial phone numbers while driving, the California Department of Motor Vehicles discourages such practice. Emailing and Texting while Driving Penalties VC 23123.5 California also prohibits the use of any wireless communication device to write, send or read a text message, email or instant message pursuant to Vehicle Code section 23123.5. The definition of wireless communication device includes ipads or other similar tablets, ipods and all smartphones. Similar to Vehicle Code Section 23123, Vehicle Code Section 23123.5 does not prohibit the use of reading or entering data into any device for the purpose of making or receiving a telephone call. Similar emergency provisions exist for this code section as well. If you are convicted of violating Vehicle Code Section 23123.5, you face the same fines as you would for violating Vehicle Code section 23123; $20 for the first offense, $50 for each subsequent offense, and a penalty assessment of up to 260 percent. Because of the high rate of frequency of distracted driving, law enforcement personnel are paying much closer attention to drivers who willfully violate the laws

against driving while talking on a non-hands free cell phone and texting/emailing while driving, especially among younger drivers. Your chances of being involved in a traffic collision increase dramatically when your attention is diverted from watching the road and driving responsibly. A fine pales in comparison to what could happen to you if you practice distracted driving by using your smartphone or wireless device to talk, text or email while behind the wheel. Vehicular Manslaughter Penalties PC 192(c) Distracted driving can cost lives and could cost you your freedom, just like what happened to Kuehl in 2008. If you kill someone while you were talking or texting while driving, you could be facing vehicular manslaughter charges. California s vehicular manslaughter laws punish acts of driving that kill another person because the driver: Drives in an unlawful way, Drives in a lawful but dangerous way, or Knowingly causes the accident for financial gain Prosecutors are likely to charge you with Penal Code 192(c) if you killed another person while you were texting or talking on your cell phone without the assistance of a hands-free device. Vehicular manslaughter in California is what s known as a wobbler offense. This means that the prosecutor has the option to charge you with either a felony or a misdemeanor. The District Attorney s office usually decides this based on: The facts of your case, and Your criminal history If you are convicted of misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter, you face up to one year in county jail. If you are convicted of felony vehicular manslaughter, you face between two and ten years in prison. You could also be sued civilly by the family of the person(s) you killed for wrongful death and could be liable for significant monetary damages in addition to any criminal punishment as a result of your conviction for this offense.

Contact the California Criminal Defense Attorneys at Wallin & Klarich If you or someone you care about has been charged with distracted driving while talking/texting, you need to call an attorney at Wallin & Klarich immediately. At Wallin and Klarich, we have over 30 years of experience successfully defending our clients who have been charged with driving-related crimes. We are familiar with all of the elements that the district attorney must prove in order to convict you of a crime, especially where a death has occured. With offices in Los Angeles, Sherman Oaks, Torrance, Tustin, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, West Covina and Victorville, the knowledgeable criminal defense attorneys at Wallin & Klarich can help you no matter where you are located. Wallin & Klarich can help you negotiate for reduced charges in order to allow you to avoid jail time, retain your driving privilege and maintain your employment.