TG-148 overview. Introduction. System Overview. System Overview. QA for Helical Tomotherapy: Report of the AAPM Task Group 148. Conflict of Interest:

Similar documents
Tomotherapy Physics. Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance. Emilie Soisson, MS

IMRT and VMAT Patient Specific QA Using 2D and 3D Detector Arrays

Quality assurance of a helical tomotherapy machine

TomoTherapy Related Projects. An image guidance alternative on Tomo Low dose MVCT reconstruction Patient Quality Assurance using Sinogram

DoseLab for TomoTherapy. AAPM Task Group 148 Background

Design and performance characteristics of a Cone Beam CT system for Leksell Gamma Knife Icon

THE WIRELESS PHANTOM PERFORM ACCURATE PATIENT QA IN LESS TIME THAN EVER!

Quick Reference Datasheet For All RIT113 Packages

ImPACT. Information Leaflet No. 1: CT Scanner Acceptance Testing

Position accuracy analysis of the stereotactic reference defined by the CBCT on Leksell Gamma Knife Icon

The team. Disclosures. Ultrasound Guidance During Radiation Delivery: Confronting the Treatment Interference Challenge.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Implementation. Outline. Acknowledgement. History of VMAT. IMAT Basics of IMAT

Using a research real-time control interface to go beyond dynamic MLC tracking

Initial Clinical Experience with 3D Surface Image Guidance

Monte Carlo methods in proton beam radiation therapy. Harald Paganetti

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Clinical implementation of photon beam flatness measurements to verify beam quality

Comparison of absorbed dose distribution 10 MV photon beam on water phantom using Monte Carlo method and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm

TOMOHD. Product Specifications

Evaluation of AutoQA Lite TM Image Quality Measurement Software

IMSURE QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE QA SOFTWARE

ph fax Deming Way Middleton WI USA

TPS COMMISSIONING. Laurence Court University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center 4/3/2017 1

Disclosure. Outline. Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., Page 1. LINAC and MLC QA for IMRT. Received research support from Siemens Medical Solutions

Radiotherapy Plan Competition TomoTherapy Planning System. Dmytro Synchuk. Ukrainian Center of TomoTherapy, Kirovograd, Ukraine

7/31/2011. Learning Objective. Video Positioning. 3D Surface Imaging by VisionRT

FAST, precise. qa software

Delta 4 PT. True Volumetric Pre-treatment Verification. The difference is clear

Automated Image Analysis Software for Quality Assurance of a Radiotherapy CT Simulator

S. Guru Prasad, Ph.D., DABR

Qalitätssicherung an Multileafkollimatoren. Dr. Lutz Müller Würzburg jan 2004

Table of Contents. About AQUA

ViewRay System Commissioning

IAEA-TECDOC-1583 Commissioning of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Systems: Testing for Typical External Beam Treatment Techniques

Real-time monitoring of linac performance using RT plans and logfiles

Evaluation report. X-ray tomographic image guided radiotherapy systems CEP10071

8/2/2017. PerFRACTION from Sun Nuclear Automated Transit Dosimetry for In-Vivo QA

Acceptance Testing and Commissioning of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Systems. Bruce Curran University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, MI

Code of practice: Create a verification plan for OCTAVIUS Detector 729 in Philips Pinnacle³

DAILY LINAC QA BEAM QA

Optimization of CT Simulation Imaging. Ingrid Reiser Dept. of Radiology The University of Chicago

Feasibility study of performing IGRT system daily QA using a commercial QA device

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

Photon beam dose distributions in 2D

Version 5.6. Quick Start Guide

4 Measurement. and Analysis. 4.1 Overview and Underlying Principles 4-1

The IORT Treatment Planning System. radiance. GMV, 2012 Property of GMV All rights reserved

A novel method to correct for pitch and yaw patient setup errors in helical tomotherapy

Chapter 9 Field Shaping: Scanning Beam

Quality Assurance for Tomotherapy Systems

Implementation of the EGSnrc / BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code - Application to medical accelerator SATURNE43

Goals. Scope/exclusions. Outline: follow outline of MPPG (plus rationale & some implementation experiences)

Introduction. Quality Assurance for Image- Guided Radiation Therapy. Justification for IGRT. Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

A secondary monitor unit calculation algorithm using superposition of symmetric, open fields for IMRT plans

Overview of Proposed TG-132 Recommendations

Protocol. Technical evaluation of X-ray tomographic image-guided radiotherapy devices CEP10070

Evaluation of 3D Gamma index calculation implemented in two commercial dosimetry systems

Automated Quality Assurance for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

8/2/2016. Measures the degradation/distortion of the acquired image (relative to an ideal image) using a quantitative figure-of-merit

Spectral analysis of non-stationary CT noise

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

Raising the Bar in IMRT QA

RITtrend allows you to effectively manage all your physics QA data in one powerful and customizable package.

Outline. Outline 7/24/2014. Fast, near real-time, Monte Carlo dose calculations using GPU. Xun Jia Ph.D. GPU Monte Carlo. Clinical Applications

Significance of time-dependent geometries for Monte Carlo simulations in radiation therapy. Harald Paganetti

3D SCANNER. 3D Scanning Comes Full Circle. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools

Thank-You Members of TG147 TG 147: QA for nonradiographic

Acknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., UCSF. Pam Akazawa, CMD, UCSF. Cynthia Chuang, Ph.D., UCSF

Spiral CT. Protocol Optimization & Quality Assurance. Ge Wang, Ph.D. Department of Radiology University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH. The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

INSTRUCTIONS RPD INFORMATION RPD PRODUCT INFORMATION. Address 5218 Barthel Industrial Drive Albertville, MN Website

MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays

Calibration and quality assurance for rounded leaf-end MLC systems

Indrin Chetty Henry Ford Hospital Detroit, MI. AAPM Annual Meeting Houston 7:30-8:25 Mon 08/07/28 1/30

Transitioning from pencil beam to Monte Carlo for electron dose calculations

A Geant4 based treatment plan verification tool: commissioning of the LINAC model and DICOM-RT interface

Lucy Phantom MR Grid Evaluation

Image Guidance and Beam Level Imaging in Digital Linacs

A dedicated tool for PET scanner simulations using FLUKA

Influence of electron density spatial distribution and X-ray beam quality during CT simulation on dose calculation accuracy

gpmc: GPU-Based Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for Proton Radiotherapy Xun Jia 8/7/2013

C a t p h a n / T h e P h a n t o m L a b o r a t o r y

Michael Speiser, Ph.D.

New Technology in Radiation Oncology. James E. Gaiser, Ph.D. DABR Physics and Computer Planning Charlotte, NC

PET-CT in Radiation Treatment Planning

Corso di laurea in Fisica A.A Fisica Medica 4 TC

3DVH : SUN NUCLEAR On The Accuracy Of The corporation Planned Dose Perturbation Algorithm Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools *Patent Pending

Preface. Med. Phys. 35(9), , Mechanical QA. Radiation Survey Mechanical tests Light radiation Table, Collimator, Gantry Jaws.

3/27/2012 WHY SPECT / CT? SPECT / CT Basic Principles. Advantages of SPECT. Advantages of CT. Dr John C. Dickson, Principal Physicist UCLH

ICARO Vienna April Implementing 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT in clinical practice: Recommendations of IAEA- TECDOC-1588

Analysis of Radiation Transport through Multileaf Collimators Using BEAMnrc Code

URGENT IMPORTANT FIELD SAFETY NOTIFICATION

URGENT IMPORTANT FIELD SAFETY NOTIFICATION

The MSKCC Approach to IMRT. Outline

Machine and Physics Data Guide

Monte Carlo Treatment Planning: Implementation of Clinical Systems

Verification measurements of an emc algorithm using a 2D ion chamber array

Image Quality Assessment and Quality Assurance of Advanced Imaging Systems for IGRT. AAPM Penn-Ohio Chapter Sep 25, 2015 Soyoung Lee, PhD

MR-guided radiotherapy: Vision, status and research at the UMC Utrecht. Dipl. Ing. Dr. Markus Glitzner

CLINICAL ASPECTS OF COMPACT GANTRY DESIGNS

Transcription:

QA or Helical Tomotherapy: Report o the AAPM Tas Group 148 Members: Conlict o Interest: r. John Balog owns TomoTherapy stoc. Katja Langen (Co-chair) Nio Papaniolaou (Co-chair) Walter Grant Richard Crilly Murty Goddu Chengyu Shi avid Followill Chester Ramsey John Balog Gustavo Olivera r. Gustavo Olivera is an employee o TomoTherapy Inc. and has a inancial interest in TomoTherapy, Inc. Introduction TG-148 provides QA guidelines speciic or helical tomotherapy. Adapt guidelines rom current TG reports where appropriate (e.g. output constancy test). Generate technology speciic guidelines or QA aspects that are not covered elsewhere (e.g. speciic mechanical alignment tests). TG-148 overview Introductory chapters. eine TomoTherapy speciic terminology. Cover unique aspects o technology and clinical implementation. Provide QA guidelines or treatment delivery, imaging, and treatment planning system. Recommendations on what to test. Provide examples o how to test. Provide summary o QA aspects according to requency. System Overview System Overview Front view Lateral view Gantry continuously rotates while patient is translated through beam plane rom: W. Kalender, Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications 1

System Overview binary MLC System Overview binary MLC System Overview Front view - QA o mechanical alignments - QA o beam parameters - QA o mechanical alignments - QA o beam parameters - Alignment o Linac in y-direction against y-jaw sweep y-jaw in y-direction, measure output 2

- Alignment o Linac in x-direction against MLC measure Tongue & Groove proile, loo or symmetry - Alignment o Linac beam divergence perpendicular to plane o rotation Mechanical alignment QA For treatment - 3 commissioned ield sizes in y-direction: 1, 2.5, and 5 cm Treatment ield centering: test that all ields have common center Mechanical alignment QA MLC centering and twist: test that MLC is centered and parallel to plane o rotation Gantry @ 0 Irradiate ilm positioned at iso Swing gantry to 180 Close central leas Film Iso Mechanical alignment QA MLC centering and twist: test that MLC is centered and parallel to plane o rotation Two outer areas should be parallel- no twist Central area should be centered between outer areas-no oset - QA o mechanical alignments - QA o beam parameters 3

Fan Beam X-direction Beam parameter QA no lattening ilter X-direction beam proile: Monthly: consistency 400 mm 10, 25, or 50 mm Y-direction Annual: agreement with model TG-142 tolerance Beam parameter QA Beam parameter QA Longitudinal beam proile: Percentage epth ose: Monthly: consistency Annual: agreement with model 1% FWHM tolerance Monthly: consistency Annual: agreement with model TG-142 tolerance Beam parameter QA Monitor output using static and/or rotational procedures: Beam parameter QA Monitor rotational output variation monthly aily (within 3%) Monthly (with calibrated IC) within 2 % Fixed gantry No MLC action Rotating gantry MLC action e.g. phantombased treatment plan Tolerance 2% 4

- QA o mechanical alignments - QA o beam parameters Synchronicity (quarterly) Gantry angle: Consistency and accuracy during tx Couch speed: Uniormity Couch translation per gantry rotation: Synchronicity Example tests are detailed in Fenwic et al. (PMB, 49, 2933-2953) - QA o mechanical alignments - QA o beam parameters Miscellaneous (monthly) Interrupted procedure = Uninterrupted procedure (tolerance 3% in delivered dose) Couch travel: actual distance = digital readout (tolerance 1 mm) Misc. couch aspects (level, sag, travel perpendicular to treatment plane) Lasers: Stationary (green) Movable (red) Miscellaneous Lasers: Miscellaneous aily: Red=Green at initialization Monthly: Red laser movement=planned movement Annual (green): Virtual iso to treatment plane = 70 cm x and z location cross in center o imaging plane 5

- QA o mechanical alignments - QA o beam parameters Calibration TG-51 equivalent static beam calibration: Problem: Q values in TG-51 are a unction o P @ 100 cm SS or 10 by 10 cm ield >> not achievable on Tomo (85 cm SS, max ield length 5 cm) >> IAEA/AAPM joint committee proposed noncompliant beam calibration ormalism (Alonso et al., Med Phys, 35, 5179-86, 2008) Calibration Allow two calibration routes: Machine-speciic reerence ield: (static delivery) Plan class speciic reerence ield: pcsr (rotational delivery) Calibration-machine speciic reerence ield () Tomo-: 5 cm by 10 cm @85 cm SS = w,q Q M N,w,Q 0, re Q,Q (Alonso et al., Med Phys, 35, 5179-86, 2008) Calibration-machine speciic reerence ield () Tomo-: 5 cm by 10 cm @85 cm SS = w,q Q M N,w,Q 0, re Q,Q Calibration-machine speciic reerence ield () Tomo-: 5 cm by 10 cm @85 cm SS = w,q Q M N,w,Q 0, re Q,Q Corrected reading in -ield Chamber calibration actor 6

Calibration-machine speciic reerence ield () Tomo-: 5 cm by 10 cm @85 cm SS = w,q Q M N,w,Q 0, re Q,Q Calibration-machine speciic reerence ield () Tomo-: 5 cm by 10 cm @85 cm SS = w,q Q M N,w,Q 0, re Q,Q Q under standard conditions Correction or IC response rom (hypothetical) standard to ield Calibration-determine Q,Q0 Measure Q in ield, convert to Q Q = 1.35805 Q 3 244.493 Q 2 +14672.98 Q 293479.4 Example: Calibration-determine Q,Q0 Example: Q = 58.74 Q Q = 58.74 Q= 59.66 Q Q= 59.66 Thomas et al., Med Phys, 32, 1346-53, 2005 Small correction Calibration-machine speciic reerence ield () Tomo-: 5 cm by 10 cm @85 cm SS = w,q Q M N,w,Q 0, re Q,Q Calibration-plan-class speciic reerence ield (pcsr) pcsr: as close as possible to a inal clinical delivery scheme, but delivers a homogeneous absorbed dose to an extended geometrically simple target volume pscr w,q pscr = pcsr Q pcsr M N,W,Q o Q,Q o, re Q,Q pcsr, Q pcsr, Q Monte Carlo Calculations by Jerai = 0.997 (Jerai et al., Med Phys, 32, 570-7, 2005) (uane et al., Med Phys, 33, 2093, 2006) uane (experimental) = 1.003 For 2.5 and 5 cm ield 7

Calibration-plan-class speciic reerence ield (pcsr) pcsr: as close as possible to a inal clinical delivery scheme, but delivers a homogeneous absorbed dose to an extended geometrically simple target volume Calibration O the two calibration routes, the calibration via pcsr-ield (rotational delivery) is the relevant route or tomotherapy. pscr w,q pscr = pcsr Q pcsr M N,W,Q o Q,Q o, re Q,Q pcsr, Q pcsr, Q (Alonso et al., Med Phys, 35, 5179-86, 2008) = 1 For 2.5 and 5 cm ields Imaging QA - Spatial/Geometry Tests - Image Quality Tests - MVCT osimetry Spatial/Geometry Tests - MVCT Image Reconstruction Accuracy (Annual) Image nown object, chec dimension, orientation, and location Tolerance: within 1 MVCT pixel Spatial/Geometry Tests - Image Registration tests (Annual) Use phantom with high contrast object: position with respect to external lasers or use nown oset Tolerance: within 1 MV/V pixel (larger pixel is limiting) aily imaging Test -Test imaging, registration, alignment chain 1) Scan 2 ) Register -compare to nown osets 3) Align -test automatic couch setup Tolerance: Consistency within 2 mm 8

Phantom-based end-to-end test - osimetric end-to-end test o registration accuracy (Annual) Phantom based end-to-end test, image, register, treat Analyze spatial accuracy o dose distribution in phantom using ilm dosimetry Accounts or registration, dose calculation, and delivery accuracy Image Quality (monthly) - Noise - Uniormity - Spatial resolution - CT-number - MVCT ose Noise Standard deviation o HU in uniorm phantom Uniormity In uniorm phantom, central and peripheral ROI: Typical noise level: 50-70 HU central region 25-35 HU in peripheral region Tolerance: less than 25 HU dierence Spatial resolution Resolution o high contrast object: CT number Important i MVCT is used or dose calculations Monitor HU or water, lung, bone equivalent material Tolerance: 1.6 mm object should be resolved Tolerance: less than 30 HU or water less than 50 HU or lung/bone 9

MVCT dosimetry Monthly MVCT QA Multiple slice average dose (MSA) measurement: Test Consistency Scan phantom with IC inserted In cheese phantom: 1-3 cgy or Normal scan 0.48 1.56 1.824 HU Noise Uniormity Spatial resolution ose On monthly basis: less than 30 % variation 0.33 - can be done with 1 MVCT scan Treatment Planning QA Geometric validation tests osimetric validation test TPS- Geometric test (annual) Test CT data import- dimensions, orientation, text Test integrity o imported structure set -volume and dimension TPS- osimetric tests (annual) Generate phantom-based plans test with IC measurements Generate plans or on- and o-axis targets Generate plans or each commissioned ield size TPS- Patient Plan QA (QA) Recalculate plan in phantom geometry: Expectation: 90% o measurements pass 3%/3mm test Example: Cheese phantom, IC and Film Tolerance: 3%/3 mm 10

Frequency: aily, monthly, quarterly, annual Example: System Maintenance Provide guidance o what to test ater wor on: Magnetron/SSM Linac/Target Y-Jaw MCL Where is TG-148 now? - Initial submission to TPC in March - Received TPC reviews in late April - Re-submission to TPC in July 11