CASE 1 TWO LANE TO FOUR LANE DIVIDED TRANSITION GEO-610-C NOT TO SCALE GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE FOR MATCH LINE LINE MATCH. 2 (0.6m) shoulder transition

Similar documents
Geometric Layout for Roadway Design with CAiCE Visual Roads

A parabolic curve that is applied to make a smooth and safe transition between two grades on a roadway or a highway.

PE Exam Review - Surveying Demonstration Problem Solutions

Horizontal and Vertical Curve Design

JCE 4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering. Horizontal and Vertical Curves

The Transition Curves (Spiral Curves)

AED Design Requirements: Superelevation Road Design

AUTODESK AUTOCAD CIVIL 2009 AND AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D Rule-Based Road Design using AutoCAD Civil and AutoCAD Civil 3D

INPUT DATA PROCEDURES

Horizontal Alignment

Transition Curves for Roads Designers Manual

CEE 3604 Transportation Geometric Design. Highways. Transportation Engineering (A.A. Trani)

Roadway Alignments and Profiles

NCDOT Civil Geometry for GEOPAK Users

1.4.3 OPERATING SPEED CONSISTENCY

CHAPTER 11. Learn to use GEOPAK Automated Superelevation dialog box and Autoshape Builder to apply superelevation to a roadway.

Sight Distance on Vertical Curves

WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Page 2D-12 Revised the following language in the last sentence on the page from; as shown in Figure 2D-3. To; as shown in Chapter 2H, Figure 2H-35.

OPTIMAL 3D COORDINATION TO MAXIMIZE THE AVAILABLE STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE IN TWO-LANE ROADS

* 28" 2'-0" NUT ROUTED 6" x 8" WOOD BLOCK GROUND LINE SHEET APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT DATE: VERT.

Request for FTE Design Exceptions & Variations Checklist

ENGINEERING SURVEYING (221 BE)

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Sight Distance on Interchange Connectors

Components of Alignment. Horizontal Alignment. Vertical Alignment. Highway Design Project. Vertical Alignment. Vertical Alignment.

DESIGN CRITERIA MEMORANDUM

Civil 3D Introduction

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Workshop Nevada DOT Las Vegas, NV February 13, 2014

Paul DiGiacobbe, PE, DBIA MASER Consulting Ryan Putt, PE HNTB Corporation Kevin Poad, PE HNTB Corporation

Estimation of Suitable Grade Value for Stopping Sight Distance Computation on Vertical Curves

COMMISSION POLICY POLICY #9.16

Mn/DOT CADD DATA Standards General Information

HW3 due today Feedback form online Midterms distributed HW4 available tomorrow No class Wednesday CEE 320

Another Look at the Safety Effects of Horizontal Curvature on Rural Two-Lane Highways

Design Elements Horizontal Milos N. Mladenovic Assistant Professor Department of Built Environment

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Modelling to Track Negative Externalities Influencing on Speed Control with GIS

OPTIMIZING HIGHWAY PROFILES FOR INDIVIDUAL COST ITEMS

DELAWARE COUNTY SECONDARY ROAD DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MEMORANDUM

New Technologies for Pavement Evaluation

AUTOCAD CIVIL 2009 AND AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D Road Rehabilitation and Reconstruction with AutoCAD Civil and AutoCAD. Civil 3D

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Particular attention has been paid to the editor s graphics (highlighting of IPs and Elements, tangent points and chainage direction).

Highway Alignment. Three-Dimensional Problem and Three-Dimensional Solution YASSER HASSAN, SAID M. EASA, AND A. O. ABD EL HALIM

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Bentley Civil Guide. SELECT series 3. Setting Up Superelevation SEP Files. Written By: Lou Barrett, BSW-Development, Civil Design

Bentley ConceptStation Workshop 2017 FLUG Spring Training Event

Federica Zampa Sineco SpA V. le Isonzo, 14/1, Milan, 20135, Italy

about touching on a topic and then veering off to talk about something completely unrelated.

MDOT. SIGNS Contracts (pp.27-37) Updated May 14, 2009

Located at Located in the Traffic Signing Category.

Bentley Civil Workshop

Clearance in Order to Provide Stopping Sight Distances

Trimble s RoadLink Utility Tutorials

1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/14

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE WAY INTERSECTION PROBLEM FOR M CYCLE SYSTEMS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Section 7 - Introducing Roadway Modeling

Sight Distance on Horizontal Alignments with Continuous Lateral Obstructions

Sight Distance Relationships Involving Horizontal Curves

Digital Terrain Model V 6.5

Welcome!! Traffic Control Technician. Training Course

Chapter 1: Introducing Roadway Modeling

Bentley Civil Workshop

Design Elements Vertical Milos N. Mladenovic Assistant Professor Department of Built Environment

Overview September 7, 2017

Northwest Needs Improvements Survey

AN AUTOMATIC HORIZONTAL CURVE RADII MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR ROADWAY SAFETY ANALYSIS USING GPS DATA

Chapter V Earth Work & Quantities. Tewodros N.

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS

Construction Surveying Curves

CONTRIBUTION TO THE INVESTIGATION OF STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE

Delivering 3D Engineered Model Data for Highway Construction

Course Instructions. 3 Easy Steps to Complete the Course: 1.) Read the Course PDF Below.

Traffic Impact Analysis Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC

ANGLES 4/18/2017. Surveying Knowledge FE REVIEW COURSE SPRING /19/2017

SPECIAL PROVISION PROJECT # F-I80-1(61)24 PIN # SECTION 01554M TRAFFIC CONTROL. D. Portable Variable Speed Limit (PVSL) System and Equipment.

Implementation of BIM for Bridge Design A Case Study

KANABEC COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Chad T. Gramentz, P.E. County Engineer 903 Forest Avenue East Mora, MN

Bentley OpenRoads Workshop 2017 FLUG Fall Training Event

Table of Contents. Note to Self-Paced Users of the Day 2 Seminar Handbook. Notices 1. Quick Reference 2. Seminar Outline 14

5/17/2017. Steven Popke, PE Wisconsin DOT Bureau of Project Development Methods Development Unit

Smoothness of Pavement in Weighin-Motion

CREATING CURVE DATA ON LOCAL ROADS TO SUPPORT SAFETY ANALYSIS

SURVEYING AND ROAD DESIGN FUNDAMENTALS

Calipatria Solar Farm TIA

DESIGN OF HIGHWAY USING EXCEL PROGRAM

Safety Impacts at Intersections on Curved Segments

Road Intersections Near Level Crossings: Intersection Awareness in Illinois. Brian Vercruysse Illinois Commerce Commission

Work Type Definition

Route Surveying. Topic Outline

InRoads File Types. Below is a list of the primary file types used for InRoads in the road design process.

Mailbox Policy for the Municipality of Fort Fairfield

Trigonometry for Surveyors p. 1 Trigonometry p. 1 Angles and Their Measurement p. 1 Expressing the Fractional Part of a Degree in Minutes and Seconds

Engineering Surveying - II CE313. Route Survey Lecture 03 Muhammad Noman

Alignments CHAPTER INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES

TCP MDT Digital Terrain Model - V7

Lesson 6: Traffic Analysis Module (TAM)

Crash Prediction Modeling for Curved Segments of Rural Two-Lane Two-Way Highways in Utah

CTRE SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION FINAL REPORT OF HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

Grade 9 Math Terminology

GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF A HIGHWAY USING MXROAD

Transcription:

CASE 1 2 (0.6m) Joint Line See sheet #5 for description of variables 4 (1.2m) Transition taper is tangent to Edge of Pavement curve at this point. 1:25 Paved shoulder transition 16 (4.m) Median width 16 (4.m) GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE FOR BY: Michigan Department of Transportation ENGINEER OF DELIVERY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY DRAWN BY: ECH BY: TWO LANE TO FOUR LANE DIVIDED TRANSITION CHECKED BY: IRG/JAT ENGINEER OF DEVELOPMENT 06/03/2010 SHEET 1 OF5

Median width 16 (4.9m) 4 (1.2m) CURVE 1 Joint line 2 (0.6m) See sheet #5 for description of variables 3 sec x 1.47 Design Speed (mph) desirable 3 sec x 0.27 Design Speed (kph) desirable other distances may be required based on physical constraints CASE 2 1:25 Paved shoulder transition 2 OF 5

DESIGN SPEED 50 40 MEDIAN WIDTHS DELTA 6^41 6^19 5^4 5^23 4^4 4^19 3^49 7^3 7^ 6^31 6^00 5^15 4^40 4^02 ^50 ^19 7^32 6^57 6^04 5^ 4^40 10^ 9^44 ^50 ^09 7^0 6^ D1 R1 T1 4.06 4.54 37.00 359.15.19 27.91 254.54 327.63 30. 279.59 257.3.16 200. 172.93 5.03 277.71 251.47 231.95 202.41.13 155.64 259. 243.92 2.47 204.09 17.56 15.91 137.61 L1 91. 2.22 773.33 717.7 640.00 575.56 50.9 654. 615.71 55.57 5. 450.00 400.00 345.71 5.9 554.44 502.22 3.33 404.44 3.00 3. 517.50 46.67 441.67 407.50 356.67 317.50 275.00 R2 D2 L2 445.56 4. 36.67 35.9.00 27.7 254.44 2.10 205.24 6.19 171.43 150.00 133.33 5.24 1.61 151. 1.97 1. 0.30 9.. 13.00 1.7 7.7 10.67 95..67 73.33 E2 6.51 5.1 4.90 4.22 3.35 2.71 2.12 3.64 3.22 2.65 2.25 1.72 1. 1.01 3.10 2.75 2. 1.92 1. 1.16 0.6 3.13 2.76 2.2 1. 1.4 1.17 0. 310.44 312.95 310.10 313.9 30. 312.13 309.25 4.3 420.69 420.22 422.17 4.09 4.50 423.42 6.9 5.56 6.43 5.93 6. 5.0 7.31 305. 306.19 305.1 305.79 305.31 305.03 305.64 371.62 3.91 3.91 3.91 3.91 3.91 3.91 327.31 23.19 1007.01 975.65 925.41 91.39 33.61 7. 749.49 0. 6.91 22.90 799. 761.0 735.03 9.10 759.31 73.1 710.1 69.10 65.63 634.73 612.53 6. 6.62 4. 56.54 559.34 539.16 519.27 344.1 349.30 349.6 356.61 356. 5.27 9.35 451.50 452.6 455.47 4.44 4.0 4.66 40. 392.93 393. 396. 39.99 404.73 40.30 416.47 32.15 3. 331.6 334.01 337.52 341.20 347.37 524.75 420. 420. 420. 420. 420. 4. 42.63 371.12 376.64 3.33 325.12 T2 223.03 0.77 193.50 179.5 1.09 3.96 127.27 109. 102.75 93.20.79 75.05 66. 57.64 0. 75.74 6.5 63. 55.20 49.13 42.45 69.19 65.05 59.01 54.43 42.3.69 972. 939.51 6.03.95 7.97 741.9 69.53 0.62 25. 77. 761.15 7.27 66.03 652.3 733.57 7.45 60.56 656.2 6.00 592.42 563.52 624.20 6.30 579. 55.61 527.3 503.22 477.73 E1 13.01.62 9.0.44 6.71 5.42 4.24 10.92 9.67 7.95 6.74 5.16 4.0 3.04.3 10.0.27 7.04 5. 4.25 3.17.73 10.37.53 7. 5.56 4.40 3.30 *Note all distances are in feet and speeds in mph. Values are based on a 12 lane width. CURVE 1 DATA CURVE 2 DATA CASE 1 DATA CASE 2 DATA 3 5 PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn OF FILE:

CURVE 1 DATA CURVE 2 DATA CASE 1 DATA CASE 2 DATA 4 5 DESIGN SPEED 120 100 0 MEDIAN WIDTHS DELTA 6^33 6^13 5^ 5^12 4^39 4^12 3^42 7^32 7^05 6^19 5^49 5^06 4^32 3^56 ^51 ^ 7^27 6^53 6^04 5^ 4^42 10^43 10^07 9^04 ^23 7^25 6^3 5^4 R1 *Note all distances are in meters and speeds in kph. Values are based on a 3.6m lane width. T1 137.33 130.33 7.3 10.9 97.44.00 77.52 9.75 92. 2.77 76. 66.0 59.37 51.51 92.6 7. 7.13 72.17 63.59 56.59 49.25.41 79.66 71. 65.96 5.33 52.16 45.59 L1 274.37 0.40 234.57 7.2 1.7 175.93 154.99 197.22 1.44 165.37 152.2 133.52 1.6 102.97 1.35 174. 156.03 4.16 127.06 3.10 9.44 16.34 15.91 2.42 131.69 6.50 104.20 91. E1 3.93 3.54 2.7 2.47 1.9 1.61 1.25 3.25 2.7 2.2 1.93 1.49 1.17 0. 3.59 3.19 2.54 2.17 1.6 1.33 1.01 3.95 3.52 2.2 2.41 1.9 1.51 1.15 R2 T2 6.67 65.16 5.69 54.49 4.72 44.00 3.76 32.92 30.95 27.59 25.40 22.27 19.79 17.17 27.0 25.55 22.79.05.55 16.51. 23.45 22.13 19.2.32 16.20.49 12.66 L2 137. 130.20 7. 10.91 97.39 7.96 77.49 65.74 61.1 55.12 50.76 44.51 39.56 34.32 54.06 51.01 45.51 42.05 37.06 32.99 2.71.76 44. 39.56.5 32. 2. 25.31 E2 1.96 1.77 1.43 1.24 0.99 0.1 0.63 1.0 0.96 0.76 0.64 0.50 0.39 0. 1.05 0.93 0.74 0.63 0.49 0.39 0. 1.10 0.9 0.7 0.67 0.52 0.42 0.32 304.3 3.77 275.37 3.72 245.9 231.50 6.49 4.66 257.52 243.91 235.59 224.10 2.41 203.61 224.79 2.02 206.4 19.1. 179. 1. 1. 179.34 169.20 162.6 153.64 1. 137.3 100.3 100.01 100.62 101.33 100.54 100. 100.67 135. 135.72 135.04 135. 135.92 135.92 135.42 107.55 107. 107.32 107.04 107.10 107.55 107.25 0. 0.39 0.16 0.33 0.40 0.52 0.2 315.2 304.79 27.61 276.90 0.65 247. 235.05 273.74 7. 254.75 247.37 237.54 2.55 2.07 232.50 2.20 5.65 20.75 199.47 192.54 1. 191.2 6.07 176.72 171.00 162.6 156.50 9.64 1.35 1.09 2.92 1.57 5.34 6.50 9. 4.45 5.45 5.95 7.05 9.41 151.10 152.91 5.35 5.47 6.5 7.05 1. 120.30 1.90 6.1 7.22 7.77.56 9. 90.91 92.15 161. 127.62 130.17 3.9 5.0 9. PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn OF FILE:

DESCRIION OF VARIABLES = length of 2 to 1 transition = distance from of curve 1 to of curve 2 (case 1) = distance from of curve 1 to of curve 2 (case 2) = tangent distance along the curve to the 2 (0.6m) point (case 1) = tangent distance along the curve to the 2 (0.6m) point (case 2) = distance from transitioning pavement widths = distance into curve 1 from that is required such that transition taper is tangent to the curve = distance between curve 1 and curve 2 (case 1) = distance between curve 1 and curve 2 (case 2) NOTES: 1. Provide the driver with sight distance along the full length of the 2 to 4 lane transition. 2. Full paved shoulders should be used along lane drop tapers. Use a 1:25 taper transition where it joins the normal median shoulder width. 3. The data provided in the tables are examples of typical situations. For combinations of design speeds, lane widths, median widths, and curve data not given in the table, the designer should interpolate a delta value (}) using median widths and calculate the remaining values. 4. If the lane drop is on a curve, plot offsets for taper and connect with appropriate curve. Design lane drops on tangent alignment if possible. 5. Spirals should be used on new alignments based on the design speed of the curve and the radius as shown in the table of the Road Standard Plan R-107-Series. 6. The cross slope in the gore area between the 2 (0.6m) point and the 22 (6.6m) point should not exceed %, with a 6% maximum algebraic difference in grades between the gore and the adjacent paved shoulder. 7. The design speed of the vertical alignment should meet or exceed the design speed of the horizontal alignment.. Each transition should be designed to provide decision sight distance at its merge points. See Geometric Design Guide GEO-300-Series. 9. Current AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" and MDOT Guidelines should be used for sight distance requirements. 10. These design concepts are for new construction. Where modification may be needed for retrofitting to existing road features, consult the Geometric Review and Congestion Analysis Unit of the Division of Operations. 5 OF 5