Confirmatory Factor Analysis on the Twin Data: Try One

Similar documents
Introduction to SAS proc calis

Conditional and Unconditional Regression with No Measurement Error

Page 1 of 8. Language Development Study

STA431 Handout 9 Double Measurement Regression on the BMI Data

Introduction to SAS proc calis

A Beginner's Guide to. Randall E. Schumacker. The University of Alabama. Richard G. Lomax. The Ohio State University. Routledge

Multiple Group CFA in AMOS (And Modification Indices and Nested Models)

Conducting a Path Analysis With SPSS/AMOS

CMAT Newsletter: March 2003

Repeated Measures Part 4: Blood Flow data

Study Guide. Module 1. Key Terms

SEM 1: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

SAS/STAT 9.2 User s Guide. The TCALIS Procedure. (Experimental) (Book Excerpt)

Bivariate (Simple) Regression Analysis

CS 395T Lecture 12: Feature Matching and Bundle Adjustment. Qixing Huang October 10 st 2018

Stat 500 lab notes c Philip M. Dixon, Week 10: Autocorrelated errors

can be used when running the LCVSEM macro from other macros to control the notes generated in the log area

lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling

SAS Structural Equation Modeling 1.3 for JMP

Week 5: Multiple Linear Regression II

Description Remarks and examples References Also see

ST512. Fall Quarter, Exam 1. Directions: Answer questions as directed. Please show work. For true/false questions, circle either true or false.

CH5: CORR & SIMPLE LINEAR REFRESSION =======================================

Chapter 15 Mixed Models. Chapter Table of Contents. Introduction Split Plot Experiment Clustered Data References...

Supplementary Notes on Multiple Imputation. Stephen du Toit and Gerhard Mels Scientific Software International

SEM 1: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Instrumental variables, bootstrapping, and generalized linear models

SEM 1: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Curve Fitting Igor Pro compared with pro Fit

WebSEM: Structural Equation Modeling Online

CHAPTER 12 ASDA ANALYSIS EXAMPLES REPLICATION-MPLUS 5.21 GENERAL NOTES ABOUT ANALYSIS EXAMPLES REPLICATION

Simulating Multivariate Normal Data

ST706: Spring One-Way Random effects example.

THIS IS NOT REPRESNTATIVE OF CURRENT CLASS MATERIAL. STOR 455 Midterm 1 September 28, 2010

Estimation of a hierarchical Exploratory Structural Equation Model (ESEM) using ESEMwithin-CFA

**************************************************************************************************************** * Single Wave Analyses.

CHAPTER 18 OUTPUT, SAVEDATA, AND PLOT COMMANDS

CSSS 510: Lab 2. Introduction to Maximum Likelihood Estimation

by John Barnard and Walter T. Federer Cornell University

Everything taken from (Hair, Hult et al. 2017) but some formulas taken elswere or created by Erik Mønness.

University Park, IL Carbondale, IL 62901

STAT:5201 Applied Statistic II

Linear regression Number of obs = 6,866 F(16, 326) = Prob > F = R-squared = Root MSE =

Annexes : Sorties SAS pour l'exercice 3. Code SAS. libname process 'G:\Enseignements\M2ISN-Series temp\sas\';

Non-Linear Least Squares Analysis with Excel

GETTING STARTED WITH THE STUDENT EDITION OF LISREL 8.51 FOR WINDOWS

Lab Session 1. Introduction to Eviews

Chapter 15: Forecasting

Unified Visualizations of Structural Equation Models

Binary IFA-IRT Models in Mplus version 7.11

Beta-Regression with SPSS Michael Smithson School of Psychology, The Australian National University

MODELING FORCED-CHOICE DATA USING MPLUS 1

CHAPTER 7 EXAMPLES: MIXTURE MODELING WITH CROSS- SECTIONAL DATA

schooling.log 7/5/2006

Solution to Bonus Questions

Expectation-Maximization Methods in Population Analysis. Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D. ICON plc.

Package merror. November 3, 2015

Week 4: Simple Linear Regression III

Baruch College STA Senem Acet Coskun

Chapter 9 Robust Regression Examples

A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Two Web Site Usability Instruments

Regression on the trees data with R

May 24, Emil Coman 1 Yinghui Duan 2 Daren Anderson 3

I How does the formulation (5) serve the purpose of the composite parameterization

NCSS Statistical Software

Multivariate Normal Random Numbers

Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks

1.1 Matlab Based LOCO

PSY 9556B (Feb 5) Latent Growth Modeling

Experimental Data and Training

Package robustreg. R topics documented: April 27, Version Date Title Robust Regression Functions

Week 4: Simple Linear Regression II

[/TTEST [PERCENT={5}] [{T }] [{DF } [{PROB }] [{COUNTS }] [{MEANS }]] {n} {NOT} {NODF} {NOPROB}] {NOCOUNTS} {NOMEANS}

Cut Out The Cut And Paste: SAS Macros For Presenting Statistical Output ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

ZunZun.com. User-Selectable Polynomial. Sat Jan 14 09:49: local server time

Path Analysis using lm and lavaan

E-Campus Inferential Statistics - Part 2

Computational Optical Imaging - Optique Numerique. -- Single and Multiple View Geometry, Stereo matching --

Nina Zumel and John Mount Win-Vector LLC

Generalized Least Squares (GLS) and Estimated Generalized Least Squares (EGLS)

STAT 5200 Handout #25. R-Square & Design Matrix in Mixed Models

The lavaan tutorial. Yves Rosseel Department of Data Analysis Ghent University (Belgium) December 18, 2017

Two-Stage Least Squares

lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more Version (BETA)

Section 2.2: Covariance, Correlation, and Least Squares

Notes for Student Version of Soritec

Set up of the data is similar to the Randomized Block Design situation. A. Chang 1. 1) Setting up the data sheet

Time-Varying Volatility and ARCH Models

Multidimensional Latent Regression

Lecture 24: Generalized Additive Models Stat 704: Data Analysis I, Fall 2010

Stable Specification Searches in Structural Equation Modeling Using a Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm

Introduction to Factor Analysis for Marketing

Appendix B BASIC MATRIX OPERATIONS IN PROC IML B.1 ASSIGNING SCALARS

Introduction to Mixed Models: Multivariate Regression

Computational Optical Imaging - Optique Numerique. -- Multiple View Geometry and Stereo --

Factorial ANOVA. Skipping... Page 1 of 18

Variogram Inversion and Uncertainty Using Dynamic Data. Simultaneouos Inversion with Variogram Updating

Reddit Recommendation System Daniel Poon, Yu Wu, David (Qifan) Zhang CS229, Stanford University December 11 th, 2011

Stat 5100 Handout #14.a SAS: Logistic Regression

Generalized Additive Model

Transcription:

Confirmatory Factor Analysis on the Twin Data: Try One /************ twinfac2.sas ********************/ TITLE2 'Confirmatory Factor Analysis'; %include 'twinread.sas'; proc calis corr; /* Analyze the correlation matrix */ var progmat reason verbal /* Name the observed vars */ headlng headbrd headcir bizyg height weight; lineqs progmat = lambda1 F1 + e1, reason = lambda2 F1 + e2, verbal = lambda3 F1 + e3, headlng = lambda4 F2 + e4, headbrd = lambda5 F2 + e5, headcir = lambda6 F2 + e6, bizyg = lambda7 F2 + e7, height = lambda8 F2 + e8, weight = lambda9 F2 + e9; std /* Variances (not standard deviations) of exogenous vars */ F1 F2 = 2 * 1, e1-e9 = 9 * psi:; cov F1 F2 = phi12; /* Notice that psi1-psi9 are being treated as free parameters, even though Var(X_j)=1 implies psi_j = 1 - lambda_j^2. MLEs will be just right, to fit the ones on the diagonal of the correlation matrix. For example, lambda1-hat = 0.6759, and psi1-hat = 0.54315 = 1-(lambda1-hat)^2 */ Twin Data 1 Covariance Structure Analysis: Pattern and Initial Values The 9 Endogenous Variables Manifest progmat reason verbal headlng headbrd headcir bizyg height weight Latent The 11 Exogenous Variables Manifest Latent F1 F2 Error e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8 e9 Page 1 of 7

Twin Data 3 Observations 74 Model Terms 1 Variables 9 Model Matrices 4 Informations 45 Parameters 19 Variable Mean Std Dev progmat 37.98649 8.64203 reason 53.35135 16.51063 verbal 74.72297 24.21764 headlng 186.37838 7.08887 headbrd 146.87838 6.16653 headcir 543.48649 16.59117 bizyg 130.55405 5.88856 height 1651 83.54899 weight 121.70946 21.80848 Correlations progmat reason verbal headlng headbrd progmat 1.0000 0.5503 0.6136 0.3138 0.1609 reason 0.5503 1.0000 0.7537 0.1582 0.0728 verbal 0.6136 0.7537 1.0000 0.2777 0.1467 headlng 0.3138 0.1582 0.2777 1.0000 0.3002 headbrd 0.1609 0.0728 0.1467 0.3002 1.0000 headcir 0.3314 0.2589 0.3149 0.8336 0.6775 bizyg 0.1843 0.2173 0.2473 0.4541 0.8046 height 0.2840 0.1403 0.2241 0.5915 0.4609 weight 0.2290 0.1452 0.1557 0.5695 0.4942 Correlations headcir bizyg height weight progmat 0.3314 0.1843 0.2840 0.2290 reason 0.2589 0.2173 0.1403 0.1452 verbal 0.3149 0.2473 0.2241 0.1557 headlng 0.8336 0.4541 0.5915 0.5695 headbrd 0.6775 0.8046 0.4609 0.4942 headcir 1.0000 0.7247 0.6115 0.6915 bizyg 0.7247 1.0000 0.6631 0.6570 height 0.6115 0.6631 1.0000 0.6677 weight 0.6915 0.6570 0.6677 1.0000 Determinant 0.000831 Ln -7.092601 NOTE: Some initial estimates computed by instrumental variable method. Page 2 of 7

Twin Data 4 Vector of Initial Estimates Parameter Estimate Type 1 lambda1 0.80267 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[1:1] 2 lambda2 0.75550 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[2:1] 3 lambda3 0.84070 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[3:1] 4 lambda4 0.99696 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[4:2] 5 lambda5 0.52745 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[5:2] 6 lambda6 1.08009 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[6:2] 7 lambda7 0.57605 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[7:2] 8 lambda8 0.60346 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[8:2] 9 lambda9 0.68732 Matrix Entry: _GAMMA_[9:2] 10 phi12 0.35431 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[2:1] 11 psi1 0.35572 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[3:3] 12 psi2 0.42921 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[4:4] 13 psi3 0.29322 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[5:5] 14 psi4 0.01000 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[6:6] 15 psi5 0.72180 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[7:7] 16 psi6 0.01000 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[8:8] 17 psi7 0.66817 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[9:9] 18 psi8 0.63583 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[10:10] 19 psi9 0.52759 Matrix Entry: _PHI_[11:11] Twin Data 5 Levenberg-Marquardt Optimization Scaling Update of More (1978) Parameter Estimates 19 Functions (Observations) 45 Optimization Start Active Constraints 0 Objective Function 15.817194358 Max Abs Gradient Element 894.29834165 Radius 58849.958394 Actual Max Abs Over Rest Func Act Objective Obj Fun Gradient Pred Iter arts Calls Con Function Change Element Lambda Change 1 0 2 0 2.82086 12.9963 19.6725 0 0.0955 2 0 3 0 2.51280 0.3081 4.9467 0 0.146 Page 3 of 7

3 0 5 0 2.00804 0.5048 0.6923 0.00456 0.509 4 0 6 0 1.97594 0.0321 0.6408 0 0.539 5 0 8 0 1.96564 0.0103 0.5409 0.00138 0.351 6 0 9 0 1.96467 0.000964 0.3653 0 0.0876 7 0 10 0 1.96135 0.00332 0.2692 0.00163 0.378 8 0 11 0 1.96104 0.000306 0.1883 0 0.109 9 0 12 0 1.96102 0.000021 0.2240 0 0.0086 10 0 13 0 1.96023 0.000794 0.1198 0.00133 0.353 11 0 14 0 1.96017 0.000056 0.1210 0 0.0713 12 0 15 0 1.95989 0.000278 0.0552 0.00195 0.425 13 0 16 0 1.95987 0.000025 0.0519 0 0.158 14 0 17 0 1.95987 2.716E-6 0.0455 0 0.0200 15 0 18 0 1.95983 0.000040 0.0339 0.00114 0.324 16 0 19 0 1.95982 3.303E-6 0.0267 0 0.0666 17 0 20 0 1.95981 0.000017 0.0160 0.00198 0.427 18 0 21 0 1.95980 1.826E-6 0.0109 0 0.182 19 0 22 0 1.95980 2.169E-7 0.0126 0 0.0265 20 0 23 0 1.95980 2.349E-6 0.00746 0.00102 0.311 21 0 24 0 1.95980 1.859E-7 0.00784 0 0.0568 22 0 25 0 1.95980 1.223E-6 0.00314 0.00222 0.454 23 0 26 0 1.95980 1.234E-7 0.00314 0 0.213 24 0 27 0 1.95980 1.472E-8 0.00255 0 0.0319 25 0 28 0 1.95980 1.21E-7 0.00222 0.00086 0.283 26 0 29 0 1.95980 1.187E-8 0.00168 0 0.0577 27 0 30 0 1.95980 7.558E-8 0.00104 0.00217 0.448 28 0 31 0 1.95980 9.529E-9 0.000606 0 0.249 29 0 32 0 1.95980 1.508E-9 0.000793 0 0.0507 30 0 33 0 1.95980 8.024E-9 0.000445 0.00083 0.290 31 0 34 0 1.95980 8.7E-10 0.000528 0 0.0636 32 0 35 0 1.95980 5.42E-9 0.000166 0.00249 0.486 33 0 36 0 1.95980 6.39E-10 0.000200 0 0.298 Twin Data 6 Optimization Results Iterations 33 Function Calls 37 Jacobian Calls 34 Active Constraints 0 Objective Function 1.9597989957 Max Abs Gradient Element 0.0001998043 Lambda 0 Actual Over Pred Change 0.2982317727 Radius 0.0011727415 GCONV convergence criterion satisfied. Page 4 of 7

Predicted Model Matrix progmat reason verbal headlng headbrd progmat 1.0000 0.5542 0.6186 0.1961 0.1625 reason 0.5542 1.0000 0.7504 0.2379 0.1971 verbal 0.6186 0.7504 1.0000 0.2656 0.2201 headlng 0.1961 0.2379 0.2656 1.0000 0.5641 headbrd 0.1625 0.1971 0.2201 0.5641 1.0000 headcir 0.2328 0.2824 0.3152 0.8080 0.6694 bizyg 0.1791 0.2172 0.2425 0.6215 0.5149 height 0.1560 0.1892 0.2112 0.5413 0.4485 weight 0.1713 0.2078 0.2320 0.5946 0.4926 Predicted Model Matrix headcir bizyg height weight progmat 0.2328 0.1791 0.1560 0.1713 reason 0.2824 0.2172 0.1892 0.2078 verbal 0.3152 0.2425 0.2112 0.2320 headlng 0.8080 0.6215 0.5413 0.5946 headbrd 0.6694 0.5149 0.4485 0.4926 headcir 1.0000 0.7376 0.6424 0.7057 bizyg 0.7376 1.0000 0.4942 0.5428 height 0.6424 0.4942 1.0000 0.4728 weight 0.7057 0.5428 0.4728 1.0000 Determinant 0.005900 Ln -5.132802 Twin Data 7 Fit Function 1.9598 Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) 0.7411 GFI Adjusted for Degrees of Freedom (AGFI) 0.5518 Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) 0.0882 Parsimonious GFI (Mulaik, 1989) 0.5352 Chi-Square 143.0653 Chi-Square DF 26 Pr > Chi-Square <.0001 Independence Model Chi-Square 517.76 Independence Model Chi-Square DF 36 RMSEA Estimate 0.2484 RMSEA 90% Lower Confidence Limit 0.2094 RMSEA 90% Upper Confidence Limit 0.2889 ECVI Estimate 2.5630 ECVI 90% Lower Confidence Limit 2.0728 ECVI 90% Upper Confidence Limit 3.1728 Probability of Close Fit 0.0000 Bentler's Comparative Fit Index 0.7570 Normal Theory Reweighted LS Chi-Square 114.7882 Akaike's Information Criterion 91.0653 Page 5 of 7

Bozdogan's (1987) CAIC 5.1596 Schwarz's Bayesian Criterion 31.1596 McDonald's (1989) Centrality 0.4534 Bentler & Bonett's (1980) Non-normed Index 0.6635 Bentler & Bonett's (1980) NFI 0.7237 James, Mulaik, & Brett (1982) Parsimonious NFI 0.5227 Z-Test of Wilson & Hilferty (1931) 8.3720 Bollen (1986) Normed Index Rho1 0.6174 Bollen (1988) Non-normed Index Delta2 0.7619 Hoelter's (1983) Critical N 21 Twin Data 8 Manifest Variable Equations with Estimates progmat = 0.6759*F1 + 1.0000 e1 Std Err 0.1091 lambda1 t Value 6.1948 reason = 0.8199*F1 + 1.0000 e2 Std Err 0.1044 lambda2 t Value 7.8501 verbal = 0.9153*F1 + 1.0000 e3 Std Err 0.1009 lambda3 t Value 9.0674 headlng = 0.8251*F2 + 1.0000 e4 Std Err 0.0965 lambda4 t Value 8.5485 headbrd = 0.6836*F2 + 1.0000 e5 Std Err 0.1040 lambda5 t Value 6.5716 headcir = 0.9792*F2 + 1.0000 e6 Std Err 0.0862 lambda6 t Value 11.3555 bizyg = 0.7533*F2 + 1.0000 e7 Std Err 0.1006 lambda7 t Value 7.4908 height = 0.6561*F2 + 1.0000 e8 Std Err 0.1053 lambda8 t Value 6.2317 weight = 0.7206*F2 + 1.0000 e9 Std Err 0.1022 lambda9 t Value 7.0486 Page 6 of 7

Variances of Exogenous Variables Standard Variable Parameter Estimate Error t Value F1 1.00000 F2 1.00000 e1 psi1 0.54315 0.10258 5.29 e2 psi2 0.32781 0.08843 3.71 e3 psi3 0.16231 0.09048 1.79 e4 psi4 0.31918 0.05964 5.35 e5 psi5 0.53267 0.09154 5.82 e6 psi6 0.04114 0.03487 1.18 e7 psi7 0.43261 0.07620 5.68 e8 psi8 0.56956 0.09727 5.86 e9 psi9 0.48069 0.08352 5.76 Twin Data 9 Covariances Among Exogenous Variables Standard Var1 Var2 Parameter Estimate Error t Value F1 F2 phi12 0.35170 0.11204 3.14 Page 7 of 7