APC APPLICATION NOTE #114

Similar documents
APC APPLICATION NOTE #146

Cooling. Highly efficient cooling products for any IT application. For More Information: (866) DATA CENTER SOLUTIONS

Improving Rack Cooling Performance Using Blanking Panels

Power and Cooling for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

APC by Schneider Electric Elite Data Centre Partner

Current Data Center Design. James Monahan Sept 19 th 2006 IEEE San Francisco ComSoc

InRow Chilled Water. Up to 70kW. Close-coupled, chilled water cooling for medium to large data centers. Row-Based Cooling.

The Efficient Enterprise. All content in this presentation is protected 2008 American Power Conversion Corporation

ENCLOSURE HEAT DISSIPATION

High Tech Getting Too Hot? High Density Environments Require A Different Cooling Approach

Rack Air Containment System (ACCS1000 ACCS1007) Overview

Virtualization and consolidation

Mission Critical Facilities & Technology Conference November 3, 2011 Cooling 101. Nick Gangemi Regional Sales Manager Data Aire

A) Differences between Precision and Comfort Cooling Here are the major differences exist between precision air conditioning and comfort systems.

APC InfraStruXure Solution Overview

Moving Containment Inside the Enclosure. Jeff Markle Great Lakes Case & Cabinet

Reducing Data Center Cooling Costs through Airflow Containment

One Stop Cooling Solution. Ben Tam Business Development Manager

Where s the Heat Coming From. Leland Sparks Global Account Technical Consultant Belden

Variable Density, Closed-Loop, Water-Cooled Data Center Solution

Implementing Hot and Cold Air Containment in Existing Data Centers

APC APPLICATION NOTE #74

APC APPLICATION NOTE #126

Close Coupled Cooling for Datacentres

Using CFD Analysis to Predict Cooling System Performance in Data Centers Ben Steinberg, P.E. Staff Applications Engineer

Recapture Capacity for Existing. and Airflow Optimization

Liquid Cooling Package LCP Cooling Systems

Ten Cooling Solutions to Support High- Density Server Deployment

How to Sell APC s Cisco Approved Solution for Nexus 7018

Total Modular Data Centre Solutions

Evaporative free air cooling technology Providing evaporative free air cooling solutions.

Deploying High-Density Zones in a Low-Density Data Center

The Energy. David L. Moss Dell Data Center Infrastructure

Combining Cold Aisle Containment with Intelligent Control to Optimize Data Center Cooling Efficiency

Power & Cooling Considerations for Virtualized Environments

Fundamentals of CFD and Data Center Cooling Amir Radmehr, Ph.D. Innovative Research, Inc.

DC Energy, Efficiency Challenges

Efficiency of Data Center cooling

Switch to Perfection

Rittal Cooling Solutions A. Tropp

Cooling on Demand - scalable and smart cooling solutions. Marcus Edwards B.Sc.

Ten Cooling Solutions to Support High-density Server Deployment. Schneider Electric Data Center Science Center White Paper #42

APC by Schneider Electric Solutions for Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Blade Applications

Industry leading low energy evaporative fresh air cooling.

Application of TileFlow to Improve Cooling in a Data Center

Google s Green Data Centers: Network POP Case Study

NetShelter CX Technical Guide

Avoidable Mistakes that Compromise Cooling Performance in Data Centers and Network Rooms

Thermal management. Thermal management

NetShelter CX Performance Guide

INNOVATE DESIGN APPLY.

PROCESS & DATA CENTER COOLING. How and Why To Prepare For What s To Come JOHN MORRIS REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF SALES

INNOVATE DESIGN APPLY.

Hot vs Cold Energy Efficient Data Centers. - SVLG Data Center Center Efficiency Summit

Survey and Audit Service Schedule. Airflow and Thermal Imaging Survey Service Schedule. Data Centre Solutions Expertly Engineered

APC InRow Cooler Prototype Initial Report - Test Setup Verification. H. Coles, S. Greenberg Contributing: J. Bean (APC) November 18, 2011

Datacenter Efficiency Trends. Cary Roberts Tellme, a Microsoft Subsidiary

7 Best Practices for Increasing Efficiency, Availability and Capacity. XXXX XXXXXXXX Liebert North America

Design and Installation Challenges: Aisle Containment Systems

MSYS 4480 AC Systems Winter 2015

Environmental Data Center Management and Monitoring

HIGH DENSITY DATACOM INTEGRATED COOLING SYSTEM.

Data center cooling evolution. The hottest way to save energy. Lucio Bustaffa: Product Development Manager BlueBox Group

Data Center Energy and Cost Saving Evaluation

Optimizing Cooling Performance Of a Data Center

Server Room & Data Centre Energy Efficiency. Technology Paper 003

Effectiveness and Implementation of Modular Containment in Existing Data Centers

Green IT and Green DC

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

DATA CENTER EFFICIENCY: Data Center Temperature Set-point Impact on Cooling Efficiency

Schneider Electric Cooling Portfolio. Jim Tubbesing Heath Wilson APC/Schneider North Texas Rep Tubbesing Solutions

Product Brochure DENCO Close Control Units Row-DENCO. High Density Cooling for Data Centres

A Green Approach. Thermal

AisleLok Modular Containment vs. Legacy Containment: A Comparative CFD Study of IT Inlet Temperatures and Fan Energy Savings

HIGH DENSITY RACK COOLING CHOICES

CHILLED WATER. HIGH PRECISION AIR CONDITIONERS, FROM 7 TO 211 kw

SMART SOLUTIONS TM INTELLIGENT, INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE DATA CENTER

A Data Center Heat Removal System That Saves... 80% Discover Inertech s Award-winning Data Center Heat Removal System

Smart Data Centres. Robert M Pe, Data Centre Consultant HP Services SEA

Data Center Temperature Rise During a Cooling System Outage

Rethinking Datacenter Cooling

Rittal White Paper 506: Cold Aisle Containment for Improved Data Center Cooling Efficiency By: Daniel Kennedy

High Efficient Data Center Cooling

IT Air Conditioning Units

Rack cooling solutions for high density racks management, from 10 to 75 kw

LCP Hybrid Efficient performance with heat pipe technology

Symmetra PX. Symmetra PX 48kW Scalable from 16kW to 48kW. Modular, Scalable, High-Efficiency Power Protection for Data Centers

Close-coupled cooling

Scalable, Secure. Jason Rylands

Calculating Total Power Requirements for Data Centers

Why would you want to use outdoor air for data center cooling?

Running Your Data Center Under Ideal Temperature Conditions

Certified 1. AMCO Enclosures Containment Brochure. Hot/Cold Aisle Containment Solutions ACB3.0. Designed and Manufactured in the USA

Rear Door Heat Exchanger

Configurable power distribution

ASHRAE Data Center Standards: An Overview

HP Modular Cooling System: water cooling technology for high-density server installations

Five Strategies for Cutting Data Center Energy Costs Through Enhanced Cooling Efficiency

Reducing Energy Consumption with

MECHANICAL AND THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR RACK DEPLOYMENT OF THE DELL POWEREDGE M-SERIES. One Dell Way Round Rock, Texas

Transcription:

APPLICATION NOT #4 Using the Rack Air Containment System with the InfraStruXure InRow SC By David Roden Abstract The InfraStruXure InRow SC (ACSC00 and ACSC0) is a self-contained air conditioner for server rooms and wiring closets. This application note provides guidelines for using the Rack Air Containment System (RACS) with these units. Additional information regarding RACS with InRow units can be found in Application Note AN-90. Introduction The InfraStruXure InRow SC is an air cooled, self-contained, cooling-only air conditioner designed to be placed in-row, between equipment racks. The in-row design allows the SC to draw in air from the rear, capturing heat from the IT equipment in the hot aisle and neutralizing it before it mixes with the room air. Conditioned air is then discharged into the cold aisle, ready for immediate use by the equipment in the adjacent racks. Figure InRow unit with RACS The Rack Air Containment System (RACS) is a modular front and rear plenum for use in isolating the supply and return air between an APC Netshelter SX rack enclosure and an APC InRow cooling solution. The containment system is designed to create a separate environment for air distribution in order to prevent mixing of hot and cold air streams, resulting in a more predictable cooling pattern. The modular design and ability to retrofit to an existing Netshelter SX rack enables medium to high density racks to be cooled in an autonomous environment without overcooling the room mixed with lower density loads. Rear containment only configurations capture the hot exhaust air in a plenum that is also connected to one or more in-row cooling unit. The in-row cooling units are designed to draw air in a back to front pattern. The warm air in the RACS plenum is drawn to the in-row cooling unit(s) where it is cooled and discharged out the front and back into the room at a room neutral temperature. _

Front and rear (full) containment configurations not only capture the hot exhaust air, but also the supply air from the in-row cooling unit, directing it to the IT equipment inlets in the adjacent rack(s). See Figure for a diagram that shows the airflow in a configuration that includes both front and rear containment. There are limitations to the number of racks and cooling units that can be configured into a single RACS. Careful attention to applying the SC with RACS must be undertaken to prevent the compressor from cycling off during low load conditions. If the compressor cycles off, there is a minimum off time period of 2-minutes where no cooling is provided and the desired rack inlet temperatures may be exceeded. It is therefore recommended that one carefully assess the minimum operating IT load that can be expected prior to operating the InRow SC within a RACS configuration. This can be accomplished by actually measuring the IT load while the system is in a state of low CPU utilization. In situations where the minimum possible load must be known when the IT equipment is not already in place, contact the IT equipment manufacturer for details. Capacity Limits and Room Conditions As a general rule of thumb, the InRow SC can support loads from a minimum of 3kW per unit, up to a maximum of 7kW for the ACSC00 and 6.3kW for the ACSC0, when used with full containment. The upper and lower per unit limits will be affected by the choice of full or rear-only containment and by the normal ambient temperature within the room, which is the average temperature of the entire room during normal operating conditions. The maximum load supported represents the IT load in the rack, not the cooling capacity of the SC unit. Approximately 500 Watts of heat will escape because of air leakage from the RACS and conduction through the component enclosures. This loss is reflected in the lower unit cooling capacity at the rated conditions, as published in the InRow SC Technical Data manual (990-8700). Rear-Only Containment Systems In configurations where only rear containment is used, the min and max heat loads are very dependant on the normal ambient room temperature. As the room temperature increases, the minimum load requirement decreases, as does the maximum load limit. For example, if a server room is normally 72 F (22.2 C) then the minimum load requirement is only.25kw. Additionally, the maximum load limit also falls, to 6.0kW for the ACSC00 and 5.4kW for the ACSC0. See Figures 2 and 3 for charts that show the relationship between room temperature and heat load limits. Minimum heat load requirements are not changed between ACSC00 and ACSC0; only maximum heat load limitations are impacted. Full Containment Systems Configurations that include both front and rear containment are less dependent on the ambient room temperature. For rooms with average temperatures in the range of 69 75 F (20.6 23.9 C) the recommended minimum load is 3kW and the maximum limit is 7kW for the ACSC00 and 6.3kW for the ACSC0. In rooms where the normal ambient falls above or below this range, the heat load minimum and maximum limitations would change in a similar manner to the rear-only containment configurations. 2

Figure 2 Minimum Heat Load versus Room Temperature Rear Containment Only Room Temperature vs Min Heat Load 3.5 Min Load Rear only nclosed RACS [kw] 3.0 2.5 2.0.5.0 0.5 0.0 66 68 70 72 74 Room Temperature Figure 3 Maximum Heat Load versus Room Temperature Rear Containment Only 7.5 Room Temperature vs Max Heat Load 7.0 Max Load Rear only RACS [kw] 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 66 68 7 73 75 78 ACSC00 ACSC0 Room Temperature [F] 3

Available Configurations A limited number of configurations are possible to suit customer needs. Combinations allowed include, SX rack with SC unit, 2 SX racks with SC unit, and SX rack with 2 SC units. See Figure 4 below. In any of these configurations the capacity limitations per SC unit must be met. Given the number of racks with associated heat loads, we can determine if the SC unit (or units) can adequately cool the load in a particular room. See the example below. 2 NetShelter SX enclosures with 2kW heat load each InfraStruXure InRow SC unit Rear containment only Ambient room temperature 72 F (22.2C) The total heat load is 4kW, which corresponds to 4kW per SC unit since there is only one. Referring to the charts we see that for this average room temperature we need a minimum heat load of.25kw and a maximum of 6.0kW per SC unit. Therefore, this configuration is viable based on the capacity limitations. Configurations other than those specified here should not be attempted. They have not been validated by ngineering and undesirable behavior may result. Figure 4 Available Configurations of InRow SC and RACS Component Selection There are several components that can be used for a RACS configuration. See Application Note AN-90 for a list of SKUs and descriptions. The exact configuration of the SC with RACS system will determine the quantities of each component required. For example, when using rear containment only a rear assembly will be required for each rack and SX unit, also one set of end 4

caps will be required. The end cap SKU contains a pair of air blocks to terminate both open ends of either a front or rear plenum section. Using front containment as well will necessitate the addition of a front assembly for each rack and SC unit, as well as another set of end caps. The example below demonstrates how to select the bill of material (BOM) for a SC with RACS configuration. Using Figure 5 as our intended configuration we will select the RACS components required. The system consists of two InRow SC units and one NetShelter SX rack with rear containment only. For this example we select a rear containment assembly for each SC and the rack, as well as one set of end caps. See Table for a summary of the BOM. A second example assumes one SC unit with one rack and full containment. See Figure 6, the BOM for this example is also summarized in Table. Figure 5 Two InRow SC units and one NetShelter SX rack with rear-only containment Figure 6 InRow SC unit and NetShelter SX rack with front and rear containment Table Summary of BOMs for SC with RACS examples Configuration Quantity SKU Description Figure 2 2 ACCS000 ACCS00 ACCS002 Rear Assembly for InRow RC/InRow SC Rear Assembly for NetShelter SX 42U 600mm Wide Rack Air Containment nd Caps ACCS000 Rear Assembly for InRow RC/InRow SC ACCS00 Rear Assembly for NetShelter SX 42U 600mm Wide Figure 3 2 ACCS002 Rack Air Containment nd Caps ACCS003 Front Assembly for InRow RC/InRow SC ACCS005 Front Assembly for NetShelter SX 42U 600mm Wide 5

Operating Modes When using the Rack Air Containment System with the InRow SC, either with full containment or rear-only containment, the user should select the RACS configuration type. Refer to Application Note AN-3 for a thorough discussion on the sequence of operations and configuration types for the InRow SC unit. Using the Spot Cool or In-row configuration type could result in undesirable behavior. Currently the SC does not provide any group control feature. In the configuration that includes two InRow SC units, both need to be operating at all times; they will not operate in a lead-lag manner. Harsh nvironments The Rack Air Containment System is not designed to protect the SC unit, or the IT equipment from environmental hazards. This includes, but is not limited to: dust, dirt, sprayed or dripping water, moisture and corrosive or combustible vapors. If the SC and RACS are used in these, or any similar environments, the unit warranties will be voided. Conclusions The Rack Air Containment System provides added flexibility, efficiency and higher density capabilities for the InRow SC. Multiple configurations of SC units and RACS components are available to satisfy customer needs and with careful planning the installations and operation can be trouble free. For all configurations it is important to carefully consider the minimal and maximize loads that each SC unit will see during operations. During light load conditions, if the minimum load requirement is not observed, the compressor will cycle off. There is a minimum off time period of 2-minutes where no cooling is provided and the desired rack inlet temperatures may be exceeded. About the Author: David Roden is the Product Manager for Small System Cooling at American Power Conversion (APC). Previously David was the Senior Applications ngineer for precision cooling solutions at APC, supporting data center projects worldwide. Prior to joining APC, David served as an officer in the United States Army. He received a Bachelors degree in mechanical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY and is a member of ASHRA. 6