MWR L1 Algorithm & Simulator

Similar documents
An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment. SAC-D/Aquarius. MWR Geometric Correction Algorithms. Felipe Madero

Simulation of Brightness Temperatures for the Microwave Radiometer (MWR) on the Aquarius/SAC-D Mission. Salman S. Khan M.S. Defense 8 th July, 2009

Appendix E. Development of methodologies for Brightness Temperature evaluation for the MetOp-SG MWI radiometer. Alberto Franzoso (CGS, Italy)

SAC-D/Aquarius. HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino. An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment

Microwave Radiometer (MWR) Evaluation of Multi-Beam Satellite Antenna Boresight Pointing Using Land-Water Crossings, for the Aquarius/ SAC-D Mission

MODIS Atmosphere: MOD35_L2: Format & Content

Revision History. Applicable Documents

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 4

Simulation and Analysis of an Earth Observation Mission Based on Agile Platform

The SMOS ocean salinity retrieval algorithm

Working with M 3 Data. Jeff Nettles M 3 Data Tutorial at AGU December 13, 2010

Geometric Rectification of Remote Sensing Images

ASTER User s Guide. ERSDAC Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center. 3D Ortho Product (L3A01) Part III. (Ver.1.1) July, 2004

Camera Parameters Estimation from Hand-labelled Sun Sositions in Image Sequences

ENVISAT Post-Launch Products ASAR

TES Algorithm Status. Helen Worden

Analysis Ready Data For Land

ASTER User s Guide Part II Level 1 Data Products (Ver.5.1) March, 2007 ERSDAC Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center

Status and description of Level 2 products and algorithm (salinity)

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. Offset Tracking Tutorial Issued August Jun Lu Luis Veci

2017 Summer Course on Optical Oceanography and Ocean Color Remote Sensing. Introduction to Remote Sensing

VIIRS Radiance Cluster Analysis under CrIS Field of Views

The inclusion of cloudy radiances in the NCEP GSI analysis system

GLOBAL PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT PRECIPITATION PROCESSING SYSTEM. File Specification AMSUBBASE. Preliminary Version

Analysis Ready Data For Land (CARD4L-ST)

MHS Instrument Pre-Launch Characteristics

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. TOPS Interferometry Tutorial Issued May 2014

S-NPP CrIS Full Resolution Sensor Data Record Processing and Evaluations

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 2

Sentinel-2 Calibration and Validation : from the Instrument to Level 2 Products

Overview of LFI maps generation and their characteristics

OCEANSAT-2 OCEAN COLOUR MONITOR (OCM-2)

STEREO EVALUATION OF ALOS/PRISM DATA ON ESA-AO TEST SITES FIRST DLR RESULTS

LAB EXERCISE NO. 02 DUE DATE: 9/22/2015 Total Points: 4 TOPIC: TOA REFLECTANCE COMPUTATION FROM LANDSAT IMAGES

Geometric Accuracy Evaluation, DEM Generation and Validation for SPOT-5 Level 1B Stereo Scene

S2 MPC Data Quality Report Ref. S2-PDGS-MPC-DQR

GEOG 4110/5100 Advanced Remote Sensing Lecture 4

Radar Data Processing, Quality Analysis and Level-1b Product Generation for AGRISAR and EAGLE campaigns

THE FUNCTIONAL design of satellite data production

Calculation of beta naught and sigma naught for TerraSAR-X data

Calibration of HY-2A Satellite Scatterometer with Ocean and Considerations of Calibration of CFOSAT Scatterometer

Radiometric Calibration of TerraSAR-X Data Beta Naught and Sigma Naught Coefficient Calculation

CORRECTING RS SYSTEM DETECTOR ERROR GEOMETRIC CORRECTION

The Staggered SAR Concept: Imaging a Wide Continuous Swath with High Resolution

Terrain correction. Backward geocoding. Terrain correction and ortho-rectification. Why geometric terrain correction? Rüdiger Gens

InSAR Operational and Processing Steps for DEM Generation

DEVELOPMENT OF CAMERA MODEL AND GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION/VALIDATION OF XSAT IRIS IMAGERY

Calibration of SMOS geolocation biases

ASCAT Verification, Calibration & Validation Plan

IMAGE CORRECTIONS 11.1 INTRODUCTION. Objectives. Structure 11.1 Introduction Concept of Image Distortion and Correction

Measuring Ground Deformation using Optical Imagery

Utilization of AGI STK and S-NPP Operational Data to Generate JPSS-1 Proxy Test Data

Summary of Publicly Released CIPS Data Versions.

Mission Status and Data Availability: TanDEM-X

The 2017 InSAR package also provides support for the generation of interferograms for: PALSAR-2, TanDEM-X

Definition of Level 1B Radiance product for OMI

Sentinel-1 Toolbox. Interferometry Tutorial Issued March 2015 Updated August Luis Veci

University of Technology Building & Construction Department / Remote Sensing & GIS lecture

Files Used in this Tutorial

Geometric Correction

ADEOS-II AMSR GROUND DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM

Evaluation of Clouds and the Earth s Radiant Energy System (CERES) scanner pointing accuracy using a coastline detection system

Reprocessing of Suomi NPP CrIS SDR and Impacts on Radiometric and Spectral Long-term Accuracy and Stability

Results of Cross-comparisons using multiple sites

Data Representation in Visualisation

Updates on Operational Processing of ATMS TDR and SDR Products

SNAP-Sentinel-1 in a Nutshell

Repeat-pass SAR Interferometry Experiments with Gaofen-3: A Case Study of Ningbo Area

ALOS Data Service and Mission Operations

ALOS PALSAR. Orthorectification Tutorial Issued March 2015 Updated August Luis Veci

Page : 1/43. KOMPSAT-5 Image Data Manual V1.0 /

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 54, NO. 5, MAY David G. Long, Fellow, IEEE, and Mary J.

Interferometry Tutorial with RADARSAT-2 Issued March 2014 Last Update November 2017

Satellite Attitude Determination

Calibration of IRS-1C PAN-camera

Suomi NPP CrIS Reprocessed SDR Long-term Accuracy and Stability

Preprocessing of Satellite Images. Radiometric and geometric corrections

DERIVATION of the BACKSCATTERING COEFFICIENT σ o in ESA ERS SAR PRI PRODUCTS

UCD discussion from SSIG. B. Cecconi, S. Erard, P. Le Sidaner Observatoire de Paris

Alaska SAR Facility. RADARSAT Modified Antarctic Mapping Mission. Calibration Plan

SMOS L1 Project Status

Retrieval of Sea Surface Temperature from TRMM VIRS

A Correlation Test: What were the interferometric observation conditions?

Operational use of the Orfeo Tool Box for the Venµs Mission

Geometric and Radiometric Calibration of RADARSAT Images. David Small, Francesco Holecz, Erich Meier, Daniel Nüesch, and Arnold Barmettler

In addition, the image registration and geocoding functionality is also available as a separate GEO package.

Beginner s Guide to VIIRS Imagery Data. Curtis Seaman CIRA/Colorado State University 10/29/2013

ENVI Automated Image Registration Solutions

MTG-FCI: ATBD for Clear Sky Reflectance Map Product

IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 9, NO. 3, MARCH

Verification of MSI Low Radiance Calibration Over Coastal Waters, Using AERONET-OC Network

ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTOS FROM VERY HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGERY

SPOT6. First 3D assessments. August 30 h, Astrium Services 2012

3 - SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR (SAR) SUMMARY David Sandwell, SIO 239, January, 2008

A GLOBAL BACKSCATTER MODEL FOR C-BAND SAR

Modern Surveying Techniques. Prof. S. K. Ghosh. Department of Civil Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee.

MODULE 3 LECTURE NOTES 3 ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTIONS

Background and Accuracy Analysis of the Xfactor7 Table: Final Report on QuikScat X Factor Accuracy

ENMAP RADIOMETRIC INFLIGHT CALIBRATION

Evaluation of Satellite Ocean Color Data Using SIMBADA Radiometers

Transcription:

MWR L1 Algorithm & Simulator Héctor Raimondo & Felipe Madero 19-21 July 2010 Seattle, Washington, USA

MWR Overview & characteristics 2 of 57

Overview & Characteristics 3 of 57

Overview & Characteristics 4 of 57

Products definitions & Processing levels 5 of 57

Products definitions q Basic Products: Specification of the Processing Levels: ü Level 0A (raw counts) ü Level 1A (L0A + eath location) ü Level 1B1 (L1A + abs. rad. corr.) ü Level 1B2 (L1B1 + along track resampling) ü Level 1B3 (L1B2 + map projection) q Derived Products: ü Wind Speed (WS) ü Wind Direction (WD) ü Ice Concentration (IC) ü Columnar Water Vapor (WV) ü Cloud Liquid Water (CLW) ü Rain Water (RW) 6 of 57

Basic Products L0A l Raw Sample Counts of the instrument l Without radiometric/geometric corrections l Easy to access: The User doesn't need to know the downlink format in order to work with the data l Includes telemetry from the spacecraft (eph, att) and from the sensor (timestamp, temperatures, etc) l Includes all auxiliary information needed to make corrections: radiometric coefficients, geometric vectors and matrices, etc. l Includes information related to the quality of the data (lossed lines, crc problems, etc). 7 of 57

Basic Products L1A Results from applying the following processes to the L0A data: l Earth Location parameters calculation (included in the geoloc file) l It doesn't contain radiometric corrections (units are digital numbers) l It doesn't contain any geometric corrections l Contains telemetry information from the spacecraft and sensor l Contains information related to the quality of the data l Contains all the information needed for the remainder corrections (absolute radiometric correction coefficients, etc) 8 of 57

Geoloc File Contents Each measurement will be associated with the following data: Ø Latitude Ø Longitude Ø Zenith angle to the spacecraft Ø Azimuth angle to the spacecraft Ø Range to the spacecraft Ø Zenith angle to the sun Ø Azimuth angle to the sun Ø Zenith angle to the moon Ø Azimuth angle to the moon 9 of 57

Basic Products L1B - L1B1 l Results from applying the following processes to the L1A data: l Absolute radiometric correction l It doesn't contain any geometric corrections l Contains telemetry information from the spacecraft and sensor l Contains information related to the quality of the data l Contains Earth Location Parameters (geoloc) l Contains all the information needed for the remainder corrections L1B1 is the main input for the generation of derived products. 10 of 57

Basic Products L1B - L1B2 l Results from applying the following processes to the L1B1 data: l l Along track resampling Earth Location parameters calculation (included in the geoloc file) l It doesn't contain any geometric corrections besides along track resampling l The objetive of along track resampling is to reduce superposition among neighbour lines, and probably to improve along track resolution, while maintaining the radiometric performance. l Contains telemetry information from the spacecraft and sensor l Contains information related to the quality of the data l Contains Earth Location Parameters (geoloc) l Contains all the information needed for the remainder corrections 11 of 57

Basic Products L1B - L1B3 l Results from applying the following processes to the L1B2 data: l l Resampling to a Map Projection Earth Location Parameters Calculation l It is desirable to use L1B2 as input, as the resampling process assume there is no superposition among neighour measurements at the input. l Contains information related to the quality of the data l Contains Earth Location Parameters (geoloc) l Contains all the information needed for the remainder corrections 12 of 57

Product Performance l Radiometric Resolution (Noise Equivalent Delta Temperature) is less than 0.5 K rms at all the channels l Brightness temperature stability is less than 1 K l Spatial Resolution is less that 54 Km l Spatial Accuracy is less than 10 Km 13 of 57

Processor: Project, Architecture & Flow Diagram 14 of 57

Software Project l The MWR processor is being developed as part of the MWP (MicroWave Processors) project at CONAE l The MWP System is defined as a set of units which shall be part of CUSS (Conae User Segment Service) l The development is guided by a software prototype developed with Python l The testing will be supported by a MWR simulator which is currently operative, developed also using Python l The specification of the algorithms to the software provider is based on radiometric and ATBD documents, which were developed hand-in-hand with the software prototype l The design enables data based parallelization. 15 of 57

Execution Flux - MWR 16 of 57

Simulation from Windat Data 17 of 57

Goals The first objetive of the simulation is to obtain a MWR L1A product using as input a calibrated Windsat Product. As secondary objectives, it is desirable to obtain L0A products from Windsat Products, and to obtain a tool so as to obtain simulated MWR data from other sources. The result of this will be used to: l Develop and test L2 Algorithms and Processors l Develop and test L1 Prototypes and Processors 18 of 57

First Version l Collaboration with the University of Central Florida in Orlando, Florida. l Geometrically it is an intelligent resampler of the Windsat product. It doesn't generate an exact MWR Geometry. l Radiometrically it is based on a conversion from Windsat Bt to MWR Bt, based on a comparison made using a Radiometric Transfer Model. l It is a matlab based system that is currently being operationally executed at CONAE using a Linux system, with an Octave environment. It generated ENVI products as output. l Its results has been already submitted to L2 science group. 19 of 57

MWR Geometry and First Version Geometry 20 of 57

Windsat Orbit idr_r21082_23_d20070201_for 21 of 57

Simulated MWR Orbit with first version ( Salman Footprint de MWR simulado a partir de Windsat (código MATLAB, tesis de 22 of 57

Zoom of products Windsat Footprint Details. West Cost of EEUU is resalted in yellow. First version simulation details. The different incidence angle of the horns results in the observed stripping. 23 of 57

Example ENVI Product 24 of 57

Second Version l CONAE Delopment. Made using a Python environment. l Currently its execution is operational. Its results has already been submited to L2 science group. l Geometrically, tries to simulate the MWR Geometry as exactly as posible. l Radiometrically, uses a similar conversion from Winsat Bt to MWR Bt, based on the same Radiation Transfer Model. But also uses the measired antenna pattern as a basis for integration of Windat data. l It also simulate more exactly the times associated to a MWR acquisiton: non null foorprint integration time, the 8 measurement cycles, the expected differences between acquisition and time tagging at platform. 25 of 57

Acquisiton times 26 of 57

Orbit and Attitude Simulation l The second version integrates the Windsat data based on a simulated SAC-D orbit, with simulated yaw steered attitude l To get SAC-D state vectors, it is used a SGP4 propagator specifically translated to python for this project. It can also use externally generated state vectors. It remains to add position measurement errors. l To get attitude, It generates SAC-D yaw steering quaternions. It remains to add attitude measurement errors, and probably, some basic simulator of attitude dynamics. l A tool has been developed in order to help to obtain the appropiate SAC- D orbit that acquires over a given Windsat Product. 27 of 57

Simulated orbit over a Windsat product 28 of 57

Radiometric and Geometric Parameters l The radiometric conversion coefficients are configurable in this version. l The geometric parameters (line of sights, alignment matrices, antenna pattern (tipically -3dB) contours, are also configurable. l We are currently using the best geometric parameters available, which resulted from antenna pattern measurements made at CONAE. 29 of 57

Example measured Line of sight and -3dB contour 30 of 57

Antenna Pattern l The measured MWR antenna patterns are used to get a weighted mean of the input Windsat footprints over the desired antenna pattern contour. l It is configurable the contour to use (-3dB, -5dB, -10dB, ). 31 of 57

Simulated MWR Product Results from Second Version of simulator 32 of 57

Zoom of Simulated MWR Product 33 of 57

Science and Supplementary Data 34 of 57

BEAM Ø The beam number indicates the horn that is beign measured for each radiometer. Both radiometers (23.8 GHz and 36.5 GHz) have 8 horns. The 23.8 horns has only V polarization. The 36.5 horns has both V and H polarization. Ø The 36.5 Ghz radiometer has no receptors for +45 and -45 polarizations. The signals for this polarizations are synthetized from H and V polarizations. Ø Two horns are measured at the same time, one per each radiometer. The horns of each radiometer are sequentially measured from number 0 to number 7. Ø Each beam will contain 5 measurements: 23.8_V, 36.5_H, 36.5_V, 36.5_-45 and 36.5_-45. 35 of 57

MWR Science Data 36 of 57

MWR Frame A MWR frame is compoused of the following information: science data associated to a beam plus HK data (Id, telemetry data, etc) for the time of acquisition of the beam. There are 82 data items each one of 16 bits. (15 science data items (1 beam) = 30 bytes and 67 HK data items & CRC = 134 bytes). 37 of 57

Id & Telemetry Data Ø Id MSB è Operation Mode (Mission, Stand Alone, Standby, Calibration, SACalibration & Diagnostic) Ø Id LSB è Horn. Ø In the telemetry data is contained the temperatures, voltages and currents of the different components of the instrument, plus temperatures of the container of MWR. Ø The temperatures govern the behaviour of the radiometer. The transfer function of the receptor depends strongly on temperature changes. 38 of 57

Science Data 39 of 57

Engineering Product - L0 Identificador Antena Antena 23.8 GHz 36.5 GHz 0x01 Bocina 2 Bocina 1 0x02 Bocina 4 Bocina 3 0x03 Bocina 6 Bocina 5 0x04 Bocina 8 Bocina 7 0x05 Bocina 1 Bocina 2 0x06 Bocina 3 Bocina 4 0x07 Bocina 5 Bocina 6 0x08 Bocina 7 Bocina 8 40 of 57

Radiometric Corrections 41 of 57

Antenna Pattern T ML : apparent temperature of the scene as observed by the main lobe T SL : apparent temperature of the scene as observed by the secondary lobe T FA : physic temperature of the antenna (horn). T A : apparent temperature as observed by the antenna. T A : temperature transpased from the antenna to the receptor of the radiometer. η L : radiation eficiency of the antenna. η M : antenna main lobe efficiency (T ML ) Si η L = 1 è T A = T A y T A = η M * T ML + (1 - η M ) * T SL è T ML = (1 / η M ) * T A ((1 - η M )/ η M ) * T SL 42 of 57

Receptor Transfer Function Receptor's transfer function: T A = β0 + β1.t 0 + β2.tf A + β3.tf + (β4.tf + β5.t N ).D Antenna Pattern: T A = off + gan * D T ML : apparent temperature of the scene as observed by the main lobe. T SL : apparent temperature of the scene as observed by the secondary lobe η M : efficiency of the main lobe of the antenna. 43 of 57

Radiometric Calibration Identificador Antena Antena 23.8 GHz 36.5 GHz 0x01 Bocina 2 Bocina 1 0x02 Bocina 4 Bocina 3 0x03 Bocina 6 Bocina 5 0x04 Bocina 8 Bocina 7 0x05 Bocina 1 Bocina 2 0x06 Bocina 3 Bocina 4 0x07 Bocina 5 Bocina 6 0x08 Bocina 7 Bocina 8 44 of 57

Geometric Corrections 45 of 57

Goals The objectives of the corrections are: l To be able to obtain the latitude, longitude, and other earth location information, for each pixel in an image, with the best accuracy at hand l Te be able to interpolate the data along track, so as to reduce overlap and improve geometric resolution, with no reduction on the radiometric quality. l To resample the bands to a given Map Projection 46 of 57

Earth Location Parameters l Plenty earth location parameters are provided: latitude, longitude, range to spacecraft, azimuth and zenith angles to spacecraft, sun, and moon. l Processor inputs (attitude and ephemeris data) are validated, and when suitable, interpolated. l Using geometric auxiliar data, such as line of sight vectors derived from antenna pattern measurements made at CONAE, and alignment matrices measured at Brasil. l The methods used try to obtain the best available accuracy by using systematic methods. So all the needed precession, nutation, polar wander calculations are considered. l DEM based processing is not needed, as the relevant data is obtained over the oceans. l As there are few measurements in an scan, there is no need to grid the data. Every measurement will have earth location parameters associated to it. 47 of 57

Resampling to a Map Projection l Resampling based on a partition of the input space in cells (using the grid of the geoloc), and calculating forward and reverse transformations for each cell, between geodetic coordinates and projected coordinates. l Transformations calculated using Singular Value Decomposition methods. l Interpolation currently using NN, Bilinear and CC. l Currently studying alternatives for doing along track interpolation. 48 of 57

Cross Calibration using Windsat 49 of 57

T b Normalization T b normalization of WS is needed to adjust differences in frequency and incidence angle with MWR RTM used to transform measurements of T b WS to frequency and incidences angles equivalents to MWR 50 of 57

T b Normalization Calculate theoretical T bmwr for geophysical parameters (1 box) T theoretical bmwr (f MWR, θ MWR, ws, SST, wv, CLW) Frequency = 23.8 & 36.5 GHz Incidence Angle = 52 & 58 Calculate theoretical T bws for geophysical parameters (1 box) T bws theoretical (f WS,Ɵ WS, ws, SST, wv, CLW) Frequency = 23.8 & 37 GHz Incidence Angle = 53 51 of 57

T measured bmwr and T measured bws (calibrated) Run RTM in order to: 1) 23.8 GHz: (v, f 1, θ 1 ) (v, f 1, θ 2 ) 1) 36.5 GHz: (v, f 2, θ 1 ) (h, f 2, θ 1 ) (v, f 2, θ 2 ) (h, f 2, θ 2 ) We get T theoretic bmwr y T theoretic bws (using GDAS data) ΔT b theoretic = T bmwr theoretic T bws theoretic T bmwr predicted = T bws measured + ΔT b theoretic 52 of 57

Then: Δ = Bias MWR = T bmwr measured T bmwr predicted So, Δ vs time: Δ Δ time time Variations with time implies corrections, if is constant or varies a little implies no corrections 53 of 57

Product Format 54 of 57

Product formats Ø Processor output: XML files. Ø CUSS will have libraries and tools to automatically generate (from XML files) products in HDF5, and other, formats. Ø CUSS will pack the products using any packing format (rar, zip, gz, tar, etc). The contect of the packet file will be: A folder with the product (XML, HDF5, GeoTiff), The associated metadata in XML format Any other needed data such as calibration files, and auxiliary data files. 55 of 57

END 56 of 57