Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Memorandum of Understanding: Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project

Similar documents
Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project

Away from Isolation: Caltrans Arterial Management

East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCSA) Financing Overview

Board of Directors April 25, BART The Next 40 Years BART Metro Vision Update Enhancing Service, Capacity and Coverage

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Arterial Performance Measures Framework

Managed Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options Proposed next steps

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

Core Capacity Transit Study. San Francisco County Transportation Authority October 17, 2017

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

Creating Dallas-Fort Worth s Transportation System: Celebrating Partnerships and Milestones

NORTH COUNTY CORRIDOR EXPRESSWAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. SUBJECT: Jacobs Engineering Contract; Task Order #2 and Task Order #3 Acceptance

Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (ACCMA)

Metrobus 30s Line Enhancements

AZTech Capability Maturity Model

NCTCOG MTP Policy Bundle Application for TXDOT

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK~ (Sharon Perlstein, City Engineerl.J'r (Oscar Delgado, Director of Public Works~~ -

Dallas City Council August 2, Jody Puckett, Assistant City Manager (I) City Manager s Office

Deployment of ITS Projects in Pasadena A Local Agency Perspective

TMC of the Future. Matt Lee Associate Vice President

Texas Clear Lanes. Congestion Relief Initiative

MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018

Traveler Information System

The Blue Line Extension

Mountain Corridor Incident Management Program

2014 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) UPDATE

2011 Congestion Management Program Update

Cedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project

Agenda Overview. Process Update Overview of Revised Goals Transportation Trends Small Group Breakout Questions and Comments Next Steps Meeting Close

South Central ROP Projects

Doug Couto Texas A&M Transportation Technology Conference 2017 College Station, Texas May 4, 2017

VIDEO-BASED AUTOMATIC INCIDENT DETECTION ON SAN-MATEO BRIDGE IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Caltrans Connected Corridors Program and Corridor System Management/Pilot Project

SUBJECT: PRESTO operating agreement renewal update. Committee of the Whole. Transit Department. Recommendation: Purpose: Page 1 of Report TR-01-17

KEEPING DATA ACCURATE WITH THE DUSA APPLICATION

National Operations Center of Excellence. Douglas W. Wiersig, P.E. Director of Transportation and Public Works, City of Fort Worth, Texas

Engaging Maryland toward CAV advancements Christine Nizer, Administrator

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

Final Report. Interstate-680 Bus-on-Shoulder Feasibility Assessment. prepared for

Executive Summary. City of Goodyear. Prepared for: Prepared by: November, 2008 Copyright 2008, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Recommendation to Board. Final Action

Northern Virginia Transportation Authority

South Central Pennsylvania Regional Operations Plan Candidate Project Listing (DRAFT)

Dulles Area Transportation Association

DOWNTOWN TUNNEL / MIDTOWN TUNNEL / MLK EXTENSION PROJECT PROCUREMENT PROCESS

Managing DC Work Zones via a Citywide Transportation Management Plan. ITE Mid-Colonial District Annual Meeting May 20, 2014

SACOG Board of Directors

Intelligent Transportation Systems. Scott Tyler, P.E. City Traffic Engineer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRESNO

Public-Private Partnerships in Transit

Transportation & Mobility

Real Time Transit. API Reference. Version 2.0

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM

San Antonio TransGuide: TOC Update ITS Texas 2009

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Business Plan

responsibilities the MOU outlines include each agencies commitment

STATEWIDE INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION RELIABILITY PROGRAM

EMP MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT. Environmental Mitigation Program Working Group January 8, 2018

MAJOR PROJECTS STRATEGY

511 DFW TRAVELER INFORMATION LESSONS LEARNED

Figure 1: Summary Status of Actions Recommended in June 2016 Committee Report. Status of Actions Recommended # of Actions Recommended

Dallas Streetcar Central Link Locally Preferred Alternative Selection

DIXIE REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Deploying High Efficiency Outdoor Lighting: Regional Streetlight Procurement Program (RSLPP)

Veirs Mill Road Metrobus Improvements Request to Conduct Public Hearing

LAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY

Escambia-Santa Rosa Regional ATMS. Escambia-Santa Rosa Regional Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Florida Alabama TPO

SMART REGION STARNET PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND MODERNIZATION STRATEGY DRAFT. December 20, 2018

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

S-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for Critical Infrastructure Protection

Advanced Transportation Optimization Systems (ATOS)

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

Regional Operations Traffic Signals Task Force Meeting #1 February 13, 2007

Municipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex

Mike Mollenhauer. Director of the Center for Technology

M50 Demand Management Study

National Operations Center of Excellence

ontents Ten Year Strategic Plan Turbo Architecture Output Appendix

STATE STREET CORRIDOR

Project Summary. Feb. 2014

Opportunities To Succeed

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) UPDATE

Office of the Mayor CONSENT CALENDAR April 7, 2015

Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008

Bay Area Regional Bicycle Share Pilot Project. Karen Schkolnick, BAAQMD SPUR Evening Forum: Bike Sharing Around the Bay June 25, 2013

33 Smart Corridor. NW 33 Innovation Corridor Council of Governments. May 11, 2017

Bus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018

Delivering urban efficiency through collaboration. Today. 林美真

Major Comments and Responses 2018 Update. Transportation Advisory Board September 19, 2018

Meeting Date: October 24, 2018

Virginia Transit Update

Santa Clara County. San Francisco City and County. Marin County. Napa County. Solano County. Contra Costa County. San Mateo County

November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING

Response to Santa Barbara County Grand Jury Reports (1) Santa Barbara County Emergency Operations Center (2) Emergency Public Information

3 ITS Standards Deployment and Testing Strategies

Webinar on Shared Transportation Services - Leveraging GTFS with Regional Partners. June 20, 2018

Panel Discussion ITS Roll-Out Plans from Road Authorities Across Canada

THEA CV PILOT OVERVIEW, STATUS, CHALLENGES, AND LESSONS LEARNED

Transcription:

Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 1, 2012 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, Interim City Manager Submitted by: Andrew Clough, Director, Public Works Subject: Memorandum of Understanding: Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the documents necessary for the City of Berkeley to join other parties in the Memorandum of Understanding for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project. SUMMARY This action is the next step for Berkeley s participation in the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project (I-80 ICM), a regional effort to reduce congestion, enhance safety, and increase the efficiency for all modes of travel along the I-80 corridor and designated portion of San Pablo Avenue. As stated in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): The primary goal of the I-80 ICM project is to enhance the effectiveness of the existing transportation network, including the freeway, ramps, parallel arterials, and the crossing arterials in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, as well as the transit service. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 63,917 Supporting the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Project Concept and Funding Plan in December 2007. Other parties to the I-80 ICM Project MOU are: the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC), Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC), Contra Costa County, AC Transit, WestCAT, and the cities of Oakland, Emeryville, Albany, El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Pinole, and Hercules. The California Transportation Commission (CTC) funded Project costs of approximately $88 million. The City of Berkeley benefits from installation of traffic control devices within its boundaries worth approximately $200,000, in return for carrying an annual expenditure for maintenance estimated at $11,520. The Project is expected to be completed in the first quarter of calendar year 2014. FISCAL IMPACTS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE ACTION The estimated cost for the City to operate and maintain the devices obtained through this project is $11,520 per year. Funding for the project will be recommended for 2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: (510) 981-7000 TDD: (510) 981-6903 Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: manager@cityofberkeley.info Website: http://www.cityofberkeley.info/manager

Memorandum of Understanding: CONSENT CALENDAR Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project May 1, 2012 appropriation in the 2014 budget from the annual Measure B Local Streets & Roads allocation. CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS The I-80 corridor, from the Bay Bridge Toll Plaza in Oakland to the Carquinez Bridge in Crockett, is one of the key traffic corridors in the Bay Area and, according to an MTC Monitoring Report, was ranked as the most congested corridor for the last consecutive 6 years. The Project corridor consists of the I-80 freeway, San Pablo Avenue (State Route 123), and crossing connectors, which in Berkeley are Gilman Street, University Avenue, and Ashby Avenue. The I-80 ICM Project will create an integrated, comprehensive and multi-modal management system along the I-80 corridor, including parallel arterials and the connecting roadways in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. The project will create an effective solution to freeway and arterial management, providing rapid incident management and real-time traveler information to the public. The purpose of the MOU (see Attachment 2) is to: 1. Confirm support from all project partners, particularly local support for ramp metering and other freeway elements; 2. Articulate key operations and maintenance (O&M) principles for continuing project development; 3. Clarify ownership, O&M, and management responsibilities; 4. Clarify the distribution of costs and funding sources; 5. Outline the framework for multi-agency cooperation, collaboration, and conflict resolution; 6. Identify which Smart Corridor devices will be made part of the I-80 ICM project; and 7. Signify the ongoing commitment of the project partners to deliver the project and make it a success. Within the City of Berkeley, the transportation infrastructure would be enhanced through the project-paid improvements worth approximately $200,000 by adding the following hardware: 1. Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption devices: 5 locations 2. Trailblazer signs along San Pablo: 6 locations 3. Upgraded traffic signal controllers along San Pablo: 16 locations 4. Vehicle Video detection cameras: 11 locations 5. Traffic signal interconnect: 1 Page 2

Memorandum of Understanding: CONSENT CALENDAR Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (I-80 ICM) Project May 1, 2012 BACKGROUND The source of almost $88 million of funding for the I-80 ICM Project is from the 2007 Bond Measure Act through the California Transportation Commission (CTC). The complete project has 3 parts: the freeway component ($55.3 million); project development local match ($8.1 million), provided by ACCMA and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority; and the local arterial and transit component ($24.3 million), through the Local Arterial Synchronization Account of the bond measure program. Given the level of traffic congestion along the I-80 Corridor, the CTC ranked the I-80 ICM Project as one with the highest cost-benefit ratio submitted for Bond Act consideration, with a return-on-investment of less than one year in transportation costs. The Berkeley portion of the project is expected to be completed by early calendar year 2014. In December 2007, the Berkeley City Council adopted Resolution No. 63,917 Supporting the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Project Concept and Funding Plan. The MOU reflects the goals, policies, and procedures agreed upon by the parties to enhance traffic operations along the I-80 corridor in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. It also identifies the overall commitment and responsibilities of ownership, operation and maintenance of the traffic control equipment installed as part of the Project. RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION This regional project provides the City with project-paid and installed safety and efficiency improvements at some of the major intersections along San Pablo and the crossing connectors to I-80. It offers an excellent benefit without incurring a capital expenditure by the City, and having a very reasonable carrying cost for operation and maintenance. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED Not participating in this regional project was considered, however, it would have deprived the City of Berkeley of increased traffic safety and operational improvements without capital costs. CONTACT PERSON Hamid Mostowfi, P.E., Supervising Traffic Engineer, Public Works, 981-6403 Attachments: 1: Resolution 2: I-80 ICM Memorandum of Understanding 3: Letter of support from PW Transportation Page 3

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S. JOIN OTHER PARTIES IN THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE I-80 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MOBILITY (ICM) PROJECT WHEREAS, Interstate 80 ( I-80 ) is an integrated freeway, arterial and principal transportation corridor from the Carquinez Bridge to the Bay Bridge Toll Plaza, a distance of approximately 20.5 miles, for the movement of people, goods, and services within Contra Costa and Alameda counties; and WHEREAS, Alameda County Congestion Management Agency ( ACCMA ), West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee ( WCCTAC ), Contra Costa Transportation Authority ( CCTA ), California Department of Transportation District 4 ( Caltrans ), and Metropolitan Transportation Commission ( MTC ) (collectively the Sponsoring Agencies ), in partnership with Contra Costa County, the cities of Hercules, Pinole, San Pablo, Richmond, El Cerrito, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, and Oakland, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District ( AC Transit ) and Western Contra Costa Transit Authority ( WestCAT ) (collectively the the Participating Agencies ), jointly participated in the development of a Systems Engineering Management Plan ( SEMP ) and a Project Study Report ( PSR ) defining the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project ( I-80 ICM Project ); and WHEREAS, the I-80 ICM Project was ranked by the California Transportation Commission ( CTC ) as one of the highest cost-benefit ratio projects submitted for the Bond Act consideration, with a return-on-investment of less than one year in transportation costs; and WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies have identified the overall goals of the I-80 Project to include improvement of mobility, enhancement of safety and increase in efficiency for all modes of travel along the corridor; and WHEREAS, due to physical and environmental constraints along the Corridor there are no other viable, short term roadway widening projects that can address congestion and mobility in the Corridor; and WHEREAS, other transportation and commute programs and projects are in place or are planned in the Corridor; and WHEREAS, with the support of the other Sponsoring Agencies, the Project has been funded for its cost of approximately $88 million; and WHEREAS, the projected cost to operate and maintain the devices obtained through this Project to enhance traffic operation and safety within the City of Berkeley is estimated at $11,520 per year; and

WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been developed to support the I-80 ICM Project, and which identifies the overall commitment and responsibilities of ownership, operation and maintenance of the traffic control equipment installed as part of the Project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the documents necessary for the City of Berkeley to join other parties in the Memorandum of Understanding for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project, along with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC), Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC), Contra Costa County, AC Transit, WestCAT, the cities of Oakland, Emeryville, Albany, El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Pinole, and Hercules.