NDIA San Diego Fall Industry Forum

Transcription

1 Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I) Program Executive Office Space Systems (PEO SS) NDIA San Diego Fall Industry Forum 24 October 2017 RDML Carl Chebi Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited (19 OCTOBER 2017) Integrated Information Warfare for the 21 st Century PEOC4I.NAVY.MIL

2 The Future Navy Deliver integrated warfighting capability. More powerful, more capable More Platforms Increased Capability Greater connectivity from seabed to space Faster. We need this more powerful fleet in the 2020s, not the 2040s Our Challenge.While managing g at the program level Accelerated delivery of required capability that is affordable, integrated, and interoperable 2

3 Desired End State Missiles Warships with Variable Depth Sonar Carrier Strike Group 1 USVs with Sonar Carrier Strike Group 2 SURTASS Warships with Towed Array Theater ASW Command USW Command RF Optical Optical Acoustic SOF Vehicles UUVs Submarines Large UUVs Torpedoes Distributed Netted Systems Comms Gateway to UUV Allied Submarines Connecting networks, platforms, and weapons to provide increased warfighting capability through spatial and spectral diversity 3

4 PEO Focus Areas Understand future capability roadmaps Define Capability SoS big R I&I, DWO, NCIP, DCIP Develop, test, field, and train at the capability level Today SoS integration occurring too late Inspecting in quality / backing into System r interoperable capability Future Build in quality - Capture capability SoS Requirements early and flow them down to System requirements Acquire, test, install, and field capability at the speed of technology Disaggregate our IT systems hardware, operating system, and applications Derive ility requirements: upgradeability, interoperability, installability, usability, testability Analysis SoS R Analysis SoS R System r System r SoS r SoS r System r System r System r Accelerated delivery of required capability that is affordable, integrated, and interoperable 4

5 Integrated Warfighting Capability Develop, test, field, and train at the capability level OBSERVE Orient PLAN FIND FIX Observe Decide TRACK Act TARGET ENGAGE Capability ASSESS Portfolio Function Sample Thread Scoring Define Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs). Link outcomes to funding requirements. 5 5

6 Capability-Based Approach Develop, test, field, and train at the capability level Problem Set FLEET FORCES Operational/Mission Need (Desired Effect) OPNAV Resourcing (Validate CDD and Resource Programs) Gap Identification and Resource Recommendations ICTB I ICTB II ASN (RDA) (SYSCOM/PEO) Execution/Deliver Effects ICTB III Integrated Fires Battlespace Awareness Assured C2 Capability Areas Counter C4I OTH-T IO/ Non-Kinetic Fires Maritime Battlespace C2 Battle Management Aids Assured Comms Thin Line NC3 Cyber Resilience Undersea Networking SoS Engineering and Acquisition Management 6

7 Information Warfare Platform 1.0 Disaggregate IT systems hardware, operating system, and applications Disaggregate HW, Data, and OS from applications Build a common foundation Provide HW, Data, and OS as a service to all applications Rapidly field small/agile apps that leverage IW Platform foundation Design Design Field Field Test Develop Develop Test Combat System 7

8 C4I Baseline Roadmap Derive ility requirements: upgradeability, interoperability, installability, usability, testability Various Shipboard Networks * Available Radio Frequency (RF) Paths * ` ` ` Can be different security levels Line-of-Sight Network 1 ` ` ` Network 2 Voice Video Teleconference SATCOM 1 SATCOM 2 * Networks and RF paths shown are examples and do not represent all networks and RF paths supported by ADNS Various program schedules Multiple configurations ADNS GPS/GPNTS ADNS CANES NMT Budget variability Ship availability schedule Common Development processes Architecture and software Test/certification/requirements Reduced installation/total ownership cost Increased training proficiency Increased cyber resiliency Given the variables above: How do we develop, test, install, and train to a C4I baseline that is always changing? How do we capture variable C4I baselines in the digital domain to enable faster. DEVOPS, MBSE, Digital Twin, Persistent CM, Automatic Test. 8

9 Training Roadmap Multi-Purpose Reconfigurable Training System Can simulate multiple platforms and baseline versions hosted on the same trainer Ease of system reconfiguration to place in any training scenario Trains operators on the entire submarine radio room C4I system Training is conducted in a team learning environment designed to meet Submarine Training Certification Instructors are able to inject faults and causalities at any point How do we achieve and maintain a training proficiency at the SoS capability level across multiple C4I baselines? How do we capture variable C4I baselines in the digital domain to enable tailored virtual environment training? DEVOPS, MBSE, Digital Twin, Persistent CM, Automatic Test. 9

10 Cyber Security Opportunities Defense in Depth/Protect, Defend, Respond, Restore Challenges Material Variable C4I Baselines, EOL Hardware, Software Cyber Hygiene System CM, Scan/ Patch, Monitoring Manning, Training, Expertise Where we need to go: Design in CYBER Digital representation of C4I baselines Tools designed to work in maritime environment that enable: Increased, real-time cyber situational awareness Automated cybersecurity functions Reduced operator workload 10

11 The Environment Would Should Could $5B/80%/97%/32% 11

12 In Bill Belichick We Trust.. All Others Bring Data Digital Twin, Cloud Ashore and Afloat, DEVOPs, Core Services, Virtualized Training Environment, Dynamic Configuration Management, Cyber Hygiene, Automatic Patching, App store, MBSE Where are our opportunities? Speed Affordability Integrated Warfighting Capability What are you doing? What should we be doing? What can you do to help us go faster, drive down cost, and deliver integrated capability? High entry barrier - PMs are doing a great job..you may disturb their plan. Looking for your ideas on how to keeps comms open/data flowing. 12

13 Accelerated delivery of required capability that is affordable, integrated, and interoperable Questions The United States Navy will be ready to conduct prompt and sustained combat incident to operations at sea

14 Phase I Premise PEO C4I programs are funded to meet their documented requirements. However: ¾ N oo ver-a arching requirements requirements to to identify identify integrated integrated No over-arching Syystem of of Systems Systems (SoS) (SoS) gaps gaps n ecessary tto o create create System necessary effe ectss. effects. No m etriccs to sscore core gaps. gaps. ¾ No metrics Fundin ng no ot ccorrectly orrectly allocated allocated to to align align fielding fielding of of ¾ Funding not systems leading leading tto o capabilities/effects. capabilities/effectts.. systems Fleet Design Document points the way towards platform agnostic SoS framework.

15 SSEE CCOP GPNTS DCGS-N CANES MEDUSA GRAYWING CCOP SSEE Platform Wholeness MEDUSA GRAYWING CCOP NOBLE GCCS-M SSEE MUOSLMMT GCCS-M NITES-Next C2OIX C2P FSBS/NC3 MTC2 MTC2 LINK-16 NMT NTCDL CSRR COMMS AT DEPTH Navy Tactical Analytics Framework CANES DMR CND ICADS GPNTS ADNS NMT STACC ADNS ADNS RADIANT MERCURY CANES CANES MOC NC3 LTS LBS UUV CANES Phase II IW MIW OLW/MOC STW SUW Joint Capability Alignment AMW ASW ATFP EW EXW IAMD