OWL & SPARQL - 웹정보시스템
|
|
- Phebe Fleming
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 - 웹정보시스템 - OWL & SPARQL Sang-goo Lee School of Computer Science & Engineering Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Seoul National University Seoul, Korea Copyright 2008~2009 SNU. All rights reserved.
2 OWL & Description Logics
3 OWL Web Ontology Language (WOL? -> OWL) is built on top of RDF was designed to be interpreted by computers (not people) is a W3C Recommendation (standard) A richer ontology language relations between classes: e.g., disjointness cardinality: e.g., exactly one richer typing of properties characteristics of properties (e.g., symmetry) Three sublanguages OWL Lite - simplest OWL DL (includes OWL Lite) - constructs with restriction OWL Full (includes OWL DL) - full expressive power OWL & SPARQL - 3
4 OWL Basic Structure (OWL Lite) (In)Equality: equivalentclass, equivalentproperty, sameas, differentfrom, AllDifferent, distinctmembers, Property Characteristics: ObjectProperty, DatatypeProperty, inverseof, TransitiveProperty, SymmetricProperty, FunctionalProperty, InverseFunctionalProperty Property Restrictions: Restriction, onproperty, allvaluesfrom, somevaluesfrom, Restricted Cardinality: mincardinality (only 0 or 1), maxcardinality (only 0 or 1), cardinality (only 0 or 1) Header Information: Ontology, imports Class Intersection: intersectionof Versioning: versioninfo, priorversion, backwardcompatiblewith, incompatiblewith, DeprecatedClass, DeprecatedProperty Annotation Properties: rdfs:label, rdfs:comment, rdfs:seealso, rdfs:isdefinedby, AnnotationProperty, OntologyProperty Extended Structure (OWL DL & Full) Class Axioms: oneof, datarange, disjointwith, equivalentclass, rdfs:subclassof Boolean Combinations of Class Expressions: unionof, complementof, intersectionof Arbitrary Cardinality: mincardinality, maxcardinality, cardinality Filler Information: hasvalue OWL & SPARQL - 4
5 OWL Examples <owl:class rdf:about="#associateprofessor"> <owl:disjointwith rdf:resource="#professor"/> <owl:disjointwith rdf:resource="#assistantprofessor"/> </owl:class> <owl:class rdf:id="faculty"> <owl:equivalentclass rdf:resource="#academicstaffmember"/> </owl:class> <owl:objectproperty rdf:id="istaughtby"> <owl:domain rdf:resource="#course"/> <owl:range rdf:resource= "#academicstaffmember"/> <rdfs:subpropertyof rdf:resource="#involves"/> </owl:objectproperty> OWL & SPARQL - 5
6 OWL Examples (cont.) <owl:objectproperty rdf:id="teaches"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#course"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource= "#academicstaffmember"/> <owl:inverseof rdf:resource="#istaughtby"/> </owl:objectproperty> <owl:class rdf:about="#firstyearcourse"> <rdfs:subclassof> <owl:restriction> <owl:onproperty <owl:allvaluesfrom </owl:restriction> </rdfs:subclassof> </owl:class> rdf:resource="#istaughtby"/> rdf:resource="#professor"/> OWL & SPARQL - 6
7 Description Logics? A family of logic based Knowledge Representation formalisms Descendants of semantic networks and KL-ONE Describe domain in terms of concepts (classes), roles (relationships) and individuals Distinguished by: Formal semantics (typically model theoretic) Decidable fragments of FOL Provision of inference services Sound and complete decision procedures for key problems OWL & SPARQL - 7
8 DL Basics Concepts (unary predicates/formulae with one free variable) E.g., Person, Father, Mother Roles (binary predicates/formulae with two free variables) E.g., haschild, hashudband Individual names (constants) E.g., Alice, Bob, Cindy Subsumption (relations between concepts) E.g. Female Person Operators (for forming concepts and roles) And(Π), Or(U), Not ( ) Universal qualifier ( ), Existent qualifier( ) Number restriction :,, = Inverse role ( - ), transitive role ( + ), Role hierarchy OWL & SPARQL - 8
9 Example OWL & SPARQL - 9
10 Role example (Inverse Role) hasparent = haschild - hasparent(bob,alice) -> haschild(alice, Bob) (Transitive Role) ancestor + ancestor(bob,david), ancestor(david, Mack) -> ancestor(bob,mack) (Role Hierarchy) hasmother hasparent hasmother(bob,alice) -> hasparent(bob, Alice) HappyFather Father Π 1 haschild.woman Π 1 haschild.man OWL & SPARQL - 10
11 OWL as DL: Axioms [Ian Horrocks] OWL & SPARQL - 11
12 OWL as DL: Class Constructors [Ian Horrocks] OWL & SPARQL - 12
13 DL Knowledge Base Knowledge Base [Ian Horrocks] Tbox (schema) HappyFather Person Π 1 haschild.woman Π 1 haschild.man Abox (data) Happy-Father(Bob) Inference System Interface Tbox (terminology, taxonomy): a set of axioms describing structure of domain (i.e., a conceptual schema) ABox (membership assertions): a set of axioms describing a concrete situation (data), e.g.: John:HappyFather; <John,Mary>:hasChild Separation has no logical significance But may be conceptually and implementationally convenient OWL & SPARQL - 13
14 DL Knowledge Base Example Tbox (terminology, taxonomy) Abox (membership assertions) OWL & SPARQL - 14
15 Description Logic Family DLs are a family of logic based KR formalisms Particular languages mainly characterised by: Set of constructors for building complex concepts and roles from simpler ones Set of axioms for asserting facts about concepts, roles and individuals ALC (Attributive Language with Complements) is the smallest DL ALC ::= A C C D C D R.C R.C Constructors include booleans (and, or, not), and Restrictions on role successors OWL & SPARQL - 15
16 OWL Full, DL, Lite SHOIQ = OWL DL S =ALCR + : ALC with transitive role H = role hierarchy O = nominal, e.g, WeekEnd = {Saturday, Sunday} I = Inverse role Q = qualified number restriction e.g. 1 haschild.man N = number restriction e.g. 1 haschild OWL Lite = SHIF(D n ) F = functionality: ( 1 R) Complexity SHOIQ: NExpTime (adding transitive roles => undecidable: OWL full) SHIF: ExpTime OWL & SPARQL - 16
17 Triple store & SPARQL
18 Triples as Graph createtriplestore( seminar.db" ) addtriple (Person1 first-name Steve) addtriple (Person1 isa Organizer) addtriple (Person1 age 52) addtriple (Person2 first-name Jans) addtriple (Person2 isa Psychologist) addtriple (Person2 age 50) addtriple (Person3 first-name Craig) addtriple (Person3 isa SalesPerson) addtriple (Person3 age 32) addtriple (Person1 colleague-of Person2) addtriple (Person1 colleague-of Person3) addtriple (Person1 likes Pizza) addtriple ( Person3 neighbour-of Person1) addtriple ( Person3 neighbour-of Person2) [Franz, Inc., 2008] OWL & SPARQL - 18
19 Query the Graph (select (?xname?yname) (?x colleague-of?y) (?y neighbour-of?x) (?x first-name?xname) (?y first-name?yname)) [Franz, Inc., 2008] OWL & SPARQL - 19
20 Triple Store A system to provide a mechanism for persistent storage and access of RDF graphs. Persistent RDF storage Why? Relational model vs OO model vs RDF model Everything is modeled as triples => very flexible cf. relational model Simple cf. relational model, OO model Standards based cf. OO model OWL & SPARQL - 20
21 Triple Store Architectures In memory Internal data representation of graph Will not scale RDB based Built on top of a relational DB - easy implementation Not optimized for RDF graph RDF specific Specially designed storage system for RDF graphs Optimized but New (not mature) AllegroGraph, Sesame, Oracle 11g (?) Issues Scalability Language support: SPARQL Level of inference: RDFS, OWL (levels), Interoperability: APIs Relational-to-RDF mapping OWL & SPARQL - 21
22 Triple Store Benchmarks Lehigh University Benchmark (LUBM) Ontology: The benchmark ontology (named Univ-Bench) Data Generator(UBA): Tool to generate synthetic OWL data over the Univ-Bench ontology in the unit of a university Test Queries: 14 test queries Tester (UBT) : The test module Ontology Benchmark (UOBM) extends the LUBM benchmark in terms of inference and scalability testing UOBM ontology and data set Berlin SPARQL Benchmark (BSBM) designed along an e-commerce use case SPARQL and SQL version available SP 2 Bench a scalable RDF data generator a set of benchmark queries OWL & SPARQL - 22
23 SPARQL SPARQL is a query language and a protocol for accessing RDF designed by the W3C RDF Data Access Working Group. a W3C Recommendation: SPARQL Query Language for RDF, SPARQL Query language can be used to get information from RDF graphs. It provides facilities to: extract information in the form of URIs, blank nodes, plain and typed literals. extract RDF subgraphs. construct new RDF graphs based on information in the queried graphs. OWL & SPARQL - 23
24 The Semantic Web Layer Tower OWL & SPARQL - 24
25 Basic Graph Pattern Triple Patterns Matching a triple pattern to a graph: bindings between variables and RDF Terms?book dc:title?title Data rdf:type rdf:type rdf:property Query SELECT?x?v WHERE {?x?x?v } Query Result x rdf:type v rdf:property OWL & SPARQL - 25
26 Basic Graph Pattern - Multiple Matches foaf: < _:a foaf:name "Johnny Lee". _:a foaf:mbox <mailto:jlow@example.com>. _:b foaf:name "Peter Guy". _:b foaf:mbox <mailto:peter@example.org>. [ Written in Turtle format: Terse RDF Triple Language ] Query PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?name?mbox WHERE {?x foaf:name?name.?x foaf:mbox?mbox } Query Result name "Johnny Lee " "Peter Guy" mbox <mailto:jlow@example.com> <mailto:peter@example.org> OWL & SPARQL - 26
27 Value dc: : ns: < :book1 dc:title "SPARQL Tutorial". :book1 ns:price 42. :book2 dc:title "The Semantic Web". :book2 ns:price 23. Query Data PREFIX dc: < PREFIX ns: < SELECT?title?price WHERE {?x ns:price?price. FILTER?price < 30.?x dc:title?title. } title "The Semantic Web" 23 price Query Result OWL & SPARQL - 27
28 Optional graph dc: < : ns: < :book1 dc:title "SPARQL Tutorial". :book1 ns:price 42. :book2 dc:title "The Semantic Web". :book2 ns:price 23. PREFIX dc: < PREFIX ns: < Query SELECT?title?price WHERE {?x dc:title?title. OPTIONAL {?x ns:price?price. title price FILTER?price < 30 }} SPARQL Tutorial "The Semantic Web" 23 Query Result OWL & SPARQL - 28
29 Order By PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?name WHERE {?x foaf:name?name } ORDER BY?name PREFIX : PREFIX foaf: < PREFIX xsd: < SELECT?name WHERE {?x foaf:name?name ; :empid?emp } ORDER BY DESC(?emp) OWL & SPARQL - 29
30 In XML Form [SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format] namex namey nicky "Alice" "Bob" "Alice" "Clare" "CT" <?xml version="1.0"?> <sparql xmlns=" <head> <variable name="namex"/> <variable name="namey"/> <variable name="nicky"/> </head> <results> <result> <binding name="namex"> <literal>alice</literal> </binding> <binding name="namey"> <literal>bob</literal> </binding> </result> <result> <binding name="namex"> <literal>alice</literal> </binding> <binding name="namey"> <literal>clare</literal> </binding> <binding name="nicky"> <literal>ct</literal> </binding> </result> </results> </sparql> OWL & SPARQL - 30
31 Query forms and Extensions Query forms SELECT: returns all, or a subset of the variables bound in a query pattern match CONSTRUCT: returns an RDF graph constructed by substituting variables in a set of triple templates DESCRIBE: returns an RDF graph that describes the resources found. ASK: returns whether a query pattern matches or not. Related specifications SPARQL Query Language for RDF defines the syntax and semantics of the SPARQL query language for RDF SPARQL Protocol for RDF defines the remote protocol for issuing SPARQL queries and receiving the results SPARQL Query Results XML Format defines an XML document format for representing the results of SPARQL queries OWL & SPARQL - 31
32 OWL & SPARQL Seoul National University Seoul, Korea Copyright 2008~2009 SNU. All rights reserved.
Semantic Web Technologies: Web Ontology Language
Semantic Web Technologies: Web Ontology Language Motivation OWL Formal Semantic OWL Synopsis OWL Programming Introduction XML / XML Schema provides a portable framework for defining a syntax RDF forms
More informationMain topics: Presenter: Introduction to OWL Protégé, an ontology editor OWL 2 Semantic reasoner Summary TDT OWL
1 TDT4215 Web Intelligence Main topics: Introduction to Web Ontology Language (OWL) Presenter: Stein L. Tomassen 2 Outline Introduction to OWL Protégé, an ontology editor OWL 2 Semantic reasoner Summary
More informationKDI OWL. Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli. University of Trento
KDI OWL Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli University of Trento Roadmap Introduction The OWL Full Language OWL DL and OWL lite Exercises 2 Introduction Chapter 1 3 Requirements for Ontology Languages
More informationSPAR-QL. Mario Arrigoni Neri
SPAR-QL Mario Arrigoni Neri 1 Introduction 2 SPARQL = SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language SPARQL - query language to manipulate information in RDF graphs. It provides support to: extract information
More informationBASI DI DATI II 2 modulo Parte VIII: SPARQL
BASI DI DATI II 2 modulo Parte VIII: SPARQL Prof. Riccardo Torlone Università Roma Tre Outline Querying RDF SPARQL Query Languages: SQL A language for querying collections of tuples: SELECT SALARY, HIRE_DATE
More informationXML and Semantic Web Technologies. III. Semantic Web / 2. Web Ontology Language (OWL)
XML and Semantic Web Technologies XML and Semantic Web Technologies. Semantic Web / 2. Web Ontology Language (OWL) Lars Schmidt-Thieme nformation Systems and Machine Learning Lab (SMLL) nstitute of Economics
More informationQuerying RDF & RDFS. Several query languages exist to retrieve
Knowledge management: Querying with SPARQL 1 Querying RDF & RDFS Several query languages exist to retrieve resulting triples from RDF RDQL SERQL SPARQL These languages use triple patterns as input and
More informationSPARQL. Dr Nicholas Gibbins
SPARQL Dr Nicholas Gibbins nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk Semantic Web Applications Technologies considered so far allow us to create representation schemes (RDFS, OWL) and to represent data (RDF) We can put data
More informationWeb Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL Bojan Furlan A Semantic Web Primer, G. Antoniou, F. van Harmelen Requirements for Ontology Languages Ontology languages allow users to write explicit, formal conceptualizations
More informationOpen Geospatial Consortium Inc.
OGC 09-010 Open Geospatial Consortium Inc. Date: 2009-07-27 Reference number of this OGC project document: OGC 09-010 Version: 0.3.0 Category: OGC Discussion Paper Editor: Kristin Stock OGC Catalogue Services
More informationSemantic Technologies
Semantic Technologies Part 14: Werner Nutt Acknowledgment These slides are based on the Latex version of slides by Markus Krötzsch of TU Dresden W. Nutt Semantic Technologies 2014/2015 (1/66) OWL W. Nutt
More informationOWL Web Ontology Language
1 de 14 09/05/2017 08:32 a.m. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004 New Version Available: OWL 2 (Document Status Update, 12 November 2009) The OWL Working Group has produced
More informationShort notes about OWL 1
University of Rome Tor Vergata Short notes about OWL 1 Manuel Fiorelli fiorelli@info.uniroma2.it [1] this presentation is limited to OWL 1 features. A new version of OWL (OWL 2), which adds further features
More informationOWL an Ontology Language for the Semantic Web
OWL an Ontology Language for the Semantic Web Ian Horrocks horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk University of Manchester Manchester, UK OWL p. 1/27 Talk Outline OWL p. 2/27 Talk Outline The Semantic Web OWL p. 2/27 Talk
More informationJans Aasman, Ph.D. CEO Franz Inc Optimizing Sparql and Prolog for reasoning on large scale diverse ontologies
Jans Aasman, Ph.D. CEO Franz Inc Ja@Franz.com Optimizing Sparql and Prolog for reasoning on large scale diverse ontologies This presentation Triples and a Graph database (2 minutes, I promise) AllegroGraph
More informationOWL and tractability. Based on slides from Ian Horrocks and Franz Baader. Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester
OWL and tractability Based on slides from Ian Horrocks and Franz Baader Where are we? OWL Reasoning DL Extensions Scalability OWL OWL in practice PL/FOL XML RDF(S)/SPARQL Practical Topics Repetition: DL
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES
FOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES OWL Syntax & Intuition Sebastian Rudolph Dresden, 26 April 2013 Content Overview & XML 9 APR DS2 Hypertableau II 7 JUN DS5 Introduction into RDF 9 APR DS3 Tutorial
More informationDescription Logic. Eva Mráková,
Description Logic Eva Mráková, glum@fi.muni.cz Motivation: ontology individuals/objects/instances ElizabethII Philip Philip, Anne constants in FOPL concepts/classes/types Charles Anne Andrew Edward Male,
More informationWeb Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen 1 Lecture Outline 1. Basic Ideas of OWL 2. The OWL Language 3. Examples 4. The OWL Namespace 5. Future Extensions 2 Requirements for Ontology
More informationOWL a glimpse. OWL a glimpse (2) requirements for ontology languages. requirements for ontology languages
OWL a glimpse OWL Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations among conceptual objects lecture 7: owl - introduction of#27# ece#720,#winter# 12# 2# of#27# OWL a glimpse (2) requirements
More informationLogical Foundations for the Semantic Web
Logical Foundations for the Semantic Web Reasoning with Expressive Description Logics: Theory and Practice Ian Horrocks horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk University of Manchester Manchester, UK Logical Foundations
More informationWeb Ontology Language: OWL by Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen
Web Ontology Language: OWL by Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen Reference: `A Semantic Web Primer, by Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen, The MIT Press, 2004 Lecture Outline 1. Basic Ideas of
More informationOWL Tutorial. LD4P RareMat / ARTFrame Meeting Columbia University January 11-12, 2018
OWL Tutorial LD4P RareMat / ARTFrame Meeting Columbia University January 11-12, 2018 Outline Goals RDF, RDFS, and OWL Inferencing OWL serializations OWL validation Demo: Building an OWL ontology in Protégé
More informationWeb Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL 1 Requirements for Ontology Languages Ontology languages allow users to write explicit, formal conceptualizations of domain models The main requirements are: a well-defined syntax
More informationChapter 4 Web Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen 1 Lecture Outline 1. Basic Ideas of OWL 2. The OWL Language 3. Examples 4. The OWL Namespace 5. Future Extensions 2 Requirements for Ontology
More informationAn Introduction to the Semantic Web. Jeff Heflin Lehigh University
An Introduction to the Semantic Web Jeff Heflin Lehigh University The Semantic Web Definition The Semantic Web is not a separate Web but an extension of the current one, in which information is given well-defined
More informationSemantic Web Test
Semantic Web Test 24.01.2017 Group 1 No. A B C D 1 X X X 2 X X 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X 6 X X X X 7 X X 8 X X 9 X X X 10 X X X 11 X 12 X X X 13 X X 14 X X 15 X X 16 X X 17 X 18 X X 19 X 20 X X 1. Which statements
More informationINF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2017
INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2017 Lecture 10: OWL, the Web Ontology Language Leif Harald Karlsen 20th March 2017 Department of Informatics University of Oslo Reminders Oblig. 5: First deadline
More informationl A family of logic based KR formalisms l Distinguished by: l Decidable fragments of FOL l Closely related to Propositional Modal & Dynamic Logics
What Are Description Logics? Description Logics l A family of logic based KR formalisms Descendants of semantic networks and KL-ONE Describe domain in terms of concepts (classes), roles (relationships)
More informationINF3580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2012
INF3580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2012 Lecture 10: OWL, the Web Ontology Language Martin G. Skjæveland 20th March 2012 Department of Informatics University of Oslo Outline Reminder: RDFS 1 Reminder:
More informationSPARQL. Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli. University of Trento
SPARQL Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli University of Trento Roadmap Introduction Basic query forms SELECT CONSTRUCT ASK DESCRIBE Other clauses and modifiers SPARQL Federated Query Exercises 2
More informationSemantic Web Ontologies
Semantic Web Ontologies CS 431 April 4, 2005 Carl Lagoze Cornell University Acknowledgements: Alun Preece RDF Schemas Declaration of vocabularies classes, properties, and structures defined by a particular
More informationAperçu de SPARQL. Exemples tirés
Aperçu de SPARQL Exemples tirés https://www.w3.org/tr/2013/rec-sparql11-query-20130321/ 1 1 Requête simple Un premier exemple dont les parties seront détaillées par la suite. Données @prefix foaf: .
More informationMaking BioPAX SPARQL
Making BioPAX SPARQL hands on... start a terminal create a directory jena_workspace, move into that directory download jena.jar (http://tinyurl.com/3vlp7rw) download biopax data (http://www.biopax.org/junk/homosapiens.nt
More informationSimplified Approach for Representing Part-Whole Relations in OWL-DL Ontologies
Simplified Approach for Representing Part-Whole Relations in OWL-DL Ontologies Pace University IEEE BigDataSecurity, 2015 Aug. 24, 2015 Outline Ontology and Knowledge Representation 1 Ontology and Knowledge
More informationQuerying Data through Ontologies
Querying Data through Ontologies Instructor: Sebastian Link Thanks to Serge Abiteboul, Ioana Manolescu, Philippe Rigaux, Marie-Christine Rousset and Pierre Senellart Web Data Management and Distribution
More informationThe Semantic Web. Craig Knoblock. (based on slides by Yolanda Gil, Ian Horrocks, Jose Luis Ambite, and Tom Russ)
The Semantic Web Craig Knoblock (based on slides by Yolanda Gil, Ian Horrocks, Jose Luis Ambite, and Tom Russ) The Semantic Web W3C s Tim Berners-Lee: Weaving the Web : I have a dream for the Web and it
More informationModeling LMF compliant lexica in OWL-DL
19 21 June 11th International conference DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. Modeling LMF compliant lexica in OWL-DL Malek Lhioui 1, Kais Haddar 1 and Laurent Romary 2 1 : Multimedia, InfoRmation
More informationChapter 4 OWL. Outline. A Brief History of OWL: SHOE. The OWL Family Tree
Chapter 4 OWL Outline 1. A bit of history 2. Basic Ideas of OWL 3. The OWL Language 4. Examples 5. The OWL Namespace 6. Future Extensions Based on slides from Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen The
More informationJOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY
JOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY Online at http://www.jot.fm. Published by ETH Zurich, Chair of Software Engineering JOT, 2005 Vol. 4, No. 1, January-February 2005 Ontology Modeling and MDA Dragan Djurić,
More informationKnowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language
Knowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language 1 RDF/RDFS RDF: triples for making assertions about resources RDFS extends RDF with schema vocabulary, e.g.: Class, Property type, subclassof, subpropertyof
More informationIntelligent Agents. Pınar Yolum Utrecht University. Spring 2018 Pınar Yolum
Intelligent Agents Pınar Yolum p.yolum@uu.nl Utrecht University Spring 2018 Pınar Yolum Web Ontology Language Spring 2018 Pınar Yolum Based largely on Dean Allemang; James Hendler, Semantic Web for the
More informationSemantic Web. Ontology and OWL. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Fall 95-96
ه عا ی Semantic Web Ontology and OWL Morteza Amini Sharif University of Technology Fall 95-96 Outline Introduction & Definitions Ontology Languages OWL (Ontology Web Language) 2 Outline Introduction &
More informationBuilding Blocks of Linked Data
Building Blocks of Linked Data Technological foundations Identifiers: URIs Data Model: RDF Terminology and Semantics: RDFS, OWL 23,019,148 People s Republic of China 20,693,000 population located in capital
More informationOntology-Based Data Access
Ontology-Based Data Access ISWC 2007 Tutorial Diego Calvanese 1, Domenico Lembo 2 1 Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 2 Sapienza Università di Roma 6th Int. Semantic Web Conference Busan, South Korea Nov.
More informationContents. G52IWS: The Semantic Web. The Semantic Web. Semantic web elements. Semantic Web technologies. Semantic Web Services
Contents G52IWS: The Semantic Web Chris Greenhalgh 2007-11-10 Introduction to the Semantic Web Semantic Web technologies Overview RDF OWL Semantic Web Services Concluding comments 1 See Developing Semantic
More informationWeb Data and Declarative Programming
and Declarative Programming Universidad de Almería. jalmen@ual.es March 2, 2010 Table of contents 1 2 XML RDF OWL 3 Querying and Reasoning with SPARQL 4 with 5 Querying and Reasoning with Research Lines
More informationOWL Full and UML 2.0 Compared
OWL Full and UML 2.0 Compared This document is intended to establish the relationship between the relevant features of UML 2.0 and OWL as part of the development of the Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM).
More informationJans Aasman, Ph.D. CEO Franz Inc GeoSpatial with AllegroGraph
Jans Aasman, Ph.D. CEO Franz Inc Ja@Franz.com GeoSpatial with AllegroGraph Why the RDF community needs GeoTemporal reasoning capabilities Most of the Semantic Web projects are about People and their relationships
More informationEvaluating DBOWL: A Non-materializing OWL Reasoner based on Relational Database Technology
Evaluating DBOWL: A Non-materializing OWL Reasoner based on Relational Database Technology Maria del Mar Roldan-Garcia, Jose F. Aldana-Montes University of Malaga, Departamento de Lenguajes y Ciencias
More informationDeep integration of Python with Semantic Web technologies
Deep integration of Python with Semantic Web technologies Marian Babik, Ladislav Hluchy Intelligent and Knowledge Technologies Group Institute of Informatics, SAS Goals of the presentation Brief introduction
More informationBryan Smith May 2010
Bryan Smith May 2010 Tool (Onto2SMem) to generate declarative knowledge base in SMem from ontology Sound (if incomplete) inference Proof of concept Baseline implementation Semantic memory (SMem) Store
More informationKnowledge Representation for the Semantic Web
Knowledge Representation for the Semantic Web Winter Quarter 2010 Pascal Hitzler Slides 6 02/04/2010 Kno.e.sis Center Wright State University, Dayton, OH http://www.knoesis.org/pascal/ KR4SW Winter 2010
More informationSemantic Web KM: A Knowledge Machine for Semantic Webs
SIG-SWO-044-07 KM Semantic Web KM: A Knowledge Machine for Semantic Webs 1,2 1,3 Seiji Koide 1,2 Hideaki Takeda 1,3 1 1 National Institute of Informatics 2 2 Ontolonomy, LLC 3 3 SOKENDAI Univ. (The Graduate
More informationChapter 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE OWL WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE 1. INTRODUCTION. Jeff Heflin Lehigh University
Chapter 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE OWL WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE Jeff Heflin Lehigh University Abstract: Key words: 1. INTRODUCTION The OWL Web Ontology Language is an international standard for encoding and
More informationFormalising the Semantic Web. (These slides have been written by Axel Polleres, WU Vienna)
Formalising the Semantic Web (These slides have been written by Axel Polleres, WU Vienna) The Semantics of RDF graphs Consider the following RDF data (written in Turtle): @prefix rdfs: .
More informationFHIR RDF Sample side by side comparisons
1 2 FHIR RDF Sample side by side comparisons V10 Tony Mallia 12/1/15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Contents 1 Datatypes (section
More informationDescription Logics and OWL
Description Logics and OWL Based on slides from Ian Horrocks University of Manchester (now in Oxford) Where are we? OWL Reasoning DL Extensions Scalability OWL OWL in practice PL/FOL XML RDF(S)/SPARQL
More informationReasoning with the Web Ontology Language (OWL)
Reasoning with the Web Ontology Language (OWL) JESSE WEAVER, PH.D. Fundamental & Computational Sciences Directorate, Senior Research Computer Scientist Discovery 2020 Short Course on Semantic Data Analysis
More informationExtracting Ontologies from Standards: Experiences and Issues
Extracting Ontologies from Standards: Experiences and Issues Ken Baclawski, Yuwang Yin, Sumit Purohit College of Computer and Information Science Northeastern University Eric S. Chan Oracle Abstract We
More informationDescription Logics. F. Description Logics. This section is based on material from Ian Horrocks:
Description Logics F. Description Logics OWL DL ist äquivalent zur Beschreibungslogik SHOIN(D n ). Auf letzterer basiert also die Semantik von OWL DL. Unter Beschreibungslogiken (Description Logics) versteht
More informationFor return on 19 January 2018 (late submission: 2 February 2018)
Semantic Technologies Autumn 2017 Coursework For return on 19 January 2018 (late submission: 2 February 2018) Electronic submission:.pdf and.owl files only 1. (6%) Consider the following XML document:
More informationThe Semantic Web. What is the Semantic Web?
The Semantic Web Alun Preece Computing Science, University of Aberdeen (from autumn 2007: School of Computer Science, Cardiff University) What is the Semantic Web, and why do we need it now? How does the
More informationKnowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language
RDF/RDFS Knowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language RDF: triples for making assertions about resources RDFS extends RDF with schema vocabulary, e.g.: Class, Property type, subclassof, subpropertyof
More informationTable of Contents. iii
Current Web 1 1.1 Current Web History 1 1.2 Current Web Characteristics 2 1.2.1 Current Web Features 2 1.2.2 Current Web Benefits 3 1.2.3. Current Web Applications 3 1.3 Why the Current Web is not Enough
More informationUnit 2 RDF Formal Semantics in Detail
Unit 2 RDF Formal Semantics in Detail Axel Polleres Siemens AG Österreich VU 184.729 Semantic Web Technologies A. Polleres VU 184.729 1/41 Where are we? Last time we learnt: Basic ideas about RDF and how
More informationGoals. Introduction to Ontologybased. Service Semantics. Functional Semantics. Need more than XML Schema. Non-functional Semantics
Goals Introduction to Ontologybased Semantics Semantic Web, ontologies, RDF, OWL, N3 With thanks to Declan O Sullivan To provide some insight into the usefulness of ontologies To provide an understanding
More informationToday: RDF syntax. + conjunctive queries for OWL. KR4SW Winter 2010 Pascal Hitzler 3
Today: RDF syntax + conjunctive queries for OWL KR4SW Winter 2010 Pascal Hitzler 3 Today s Session: RDF Schema 1. Motivation 2. Classes and Class Hierarchies 3. Properties and Property Hierarchies 4. Property
More informationSemantic Web and Python Concepts to Application development
PyCon 2009 IISc, Bangalore, India Semantic Web and Python Concepts to Application development Vinay Modi Voice Pitara Technologies Private Limited Outline Web Need better web for the future Knowledge Representation
More informationAI Fundamentals: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Maria Simi
AI Fundamentals: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Maria Simi Description logics LESSON 6: SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS, DECISION PROBLEMS, INFERENCE Categories and objects [AIMA, Cap 12] Most of the reasoning
More informationSEMANTIC WEB AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFERENCE ENGINES
SEMANTIC WEB AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INFERENCE ENGINES Ms. Neha Dalwadi 1, Prof. Bhaumik Nagar 2, Prof. Ashwin Makwana 1 1 Computer Engineering, Chandubhai S Patel Institute of Technology Changa, Dist.
More informationSemantic Web. MPRI : Web Data Management. Antoine Amarilli Friday, January 11th 1/29
Semantic Web MPRI 2.26.2: Web Data Management Antoine Amarilli Friday, January 11th 1/29 Motivation Information on the Web is not structured 2/29 Motivation Information on the Web is not structured This
More informationOWL 2 Update. Christine Golbreich
OWL 2 Update Christine Golbreich 1 OWL 2 W3C OWL working group is developing OWL 2 see http://www.w3.org/2007/owl/wiki/ Extends OWL with a small but useful set of features Fully backwards
More informationLecture 8 OWL: Web Ontology Language
info-h-509 xml technologies Lecture 8 OWL: Web Ontology Language Stijn Vansummeren February 14, 2017 lecture outline 1 Our story so far 2 Web Ontology Language OWL 3 Reasoning with OWL 1 Part I: Our story
More informationOntologies and OWL. Riccardo Rosati. Knowledge Representation and Semantic Technologies
Knowledge Representation and Semantic Technologies Ontologies and OWL Riccardo Rosati Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Informatica Sapienza Università di Roma 2016/2017 The Semantic Web Tower Ontologies
More informationKnowledge Engineering with Semantic Web Technologies
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0) Knowledge Engineering with Semantic Web Technologies Lecture 3 Ontologies and Logic 3.7 Description Logics
More informationReasoning with DAML+OIL:
Reasoning with DAML+OIL: What can it do for YOU? Ian Horrocks horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk University of Manchester Manchester, UK DAML PI meeting, Nashua, July 2001 p.1/9 DAML+OIL Language Overview DAML+OIL
More informationLogic and Reasoning in the Semantic Web (part I RDF/RDFS)
Logic and Reasoning in the Semantic Web (part I RDF/RDFS) Fulvio Corno, Laura Farinetti Politecnico di Torino Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica e-lite Research Group http://elite.polito.it Outline
More informationReminder: RDF triples
Reminder: RDF triples The RDF data model is similar to classical conceptual modelling approaches such as entity relationship or class diagrams it is based on the idea of making statements about resources
More informationPresented By Aditya R Joshi Neha Purohit
Presented By Aditya R Joshi Neha Purohit Pellet What is Pellet? Pellet is an OWL- DL reasoner Supports nearly all of OWL 1 and OWL 2 Sound and complete reasoner Written in Java and available from http://
More informationOntology-based Metadata for MidArch-Styles
Fakultät II Informatik, Wirtschafts- und Rechtswissenschaften Department für Informatik Abteilung Software Engineering Diploma Thesis Ontology-based Metadata for MidArch-Styles Reiner Jung 7th May 2008
More informationLECTURE 09 RDF: SCHEMA - AN INTRODUCTION
SEMANTIC WEB LECTURE 09 RDF: SCHEMA - AN INTRODUCTION IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD THE SEMANTIC WEB LAYER CAKE 2 SW S16 09- RDFs: RDF Schema 1 IMPORTANT ASSUMPTION The following
More informationHelmi Ben Hmida Hannover University, Germany
Helmi Ben Hmida Hannover University, Germany 1 Summarizing the Problem: Computers don t understand Meaning My mouse is broken. I need a new one 2 The Semantic Web Vision the idea of having data on the
More informationOntoViBe: An Ontology Visualization Benchmark
OntoViBe: An Ontology Visualization Benchmark Florian Haag 1, Steffen Lohmann 1, Stefan Negru 2, and Thomas Ertl 1 1 Institute for Visualization and Interactive Systems, University of Stuttgart, Universitätsstraße
More informationGenea: Schema-Aware Mapping of Ontologies into Relational Databases
Genea: Schema-Aware Mapping of Ontologies into Relational Databases Tim Kraska Uwe Röhm University of Sydney School of Information Technologies Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia mail@tim-kraska.de roehm@it.usyd.edu.au
More information12th ICCRTS. On the Automated Generation of an OWL Ontology based on the Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM)
12th ICCRTS On the Automated Generation of an OWL Ontology based on the Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM) Christopher J. Matheus and Brian Ulicny VIStology, Inc. Framingham, MA, U.S.A.
More informationRDF AND SPARQL. Part IV: Syntax of SPARQL. Dresden, August Sebastian Rudolph ICCL Summer School
RDF AND SPARQL Part IV: Syntax of SPARQL Sebastian Rudolph ICCL Summer School Dresden, August 2013 Agenda 1 Introduction and Motivation 2 Simple SPARQL Queries 3 Complex Graph Pattern 4 Filters 5 Solution
More informationLinked data and its role in the semantic web. Dave Reynolds, Epimorphics
Linked data and its role in the semantic web Dave Reynolds, Epimorphics Ltd @der42 Roadmap What is linked data? Modelling Strengths and weaknesses Examples Access other topics image: Leo Oosterloo @ flickr.com
More information08 OWL SEMANTIC WEB ONTOLOGY WEB LANGUAGE IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD
SEMANTIC WEB 08 OWL ONTOLOGY WEB LANGUAGE IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD WWW.IMRANIHSAN.COM BASED ON SLIDES FROM GRIGORIS ANTONIOU AND FRANK VAN HARMELEN THE OWL FAMILY TREE
More informationOutline RDF. RDF Schema (RDFS) RDF Storing. Semantic Web and Metadata What is RDF and what is not? Why use RDF? RDF Elements
Knowledge management RDF and RDFS 1 RDF Outline Semantic Web and Metadata What is RDF and what is not? Why use RDF? RDF Elements RDF Schema (RDFS) RDF Storing 2 Semantic Web The Web today: Documents for
More informationWhat is the Semantic Web?
What is the Semantic Web? Sir Tim Berners-Lee's vision of the Web as a universal medium for data, information, and knowledge exchange. An evolving extension of the World Wide Web in which the semantics
More informationChapter 3. RDF Schema
Chapter 3 RDF Schema Introduction l RDF has a very simple data model l RDF Schema (RDFS) enriches the data model, adding vocabulary & associated semantics for Classes and es Properties and sub-properties
More informationSEMANTIC WEB 05 RDF SCHEMA MODELLING SEMANTICS IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD
SEMANTIC WEB 05 RDF SCHEMA MODELLING SEMANTICS IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD WWW.IMRANIHSAN.COM INTRODUCTION RDF has a very simple data model RDF Schema (RDFS) enriches the
More informationStandardization of Ontologies
Standardization of Ontologies Kore Nordmann TU Dortmund March 17, 2009 Outline History Related technologies Ontology development General history HTML UNTANGLE HTML 2.0 XML rec. XHTML RDF(S)
More informationRacer - An Inference Engine for the Semantic Web
Racer - An Inference Engine for the Semantic Web Concordia University Department of Computer Science and Software Enineering http://www.cse.concordia.ca/~haarslev/ Collaboration with: Ralf Möller, Hamburg
More informationOWL 2 Syntax and Semantics Sebastian Rudolph
FOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES OWL 2 Syntax and Semantics Sebastian Rudolph OWL OWL Agenda Recap OWL & Overview OWL 2 The Description Logic SROIQ Inferencing with SROIQ OWL 2 DL OWL 2 Profiles
More informationFlexible Tools for the Semantic Web
Flexible Tools for the Semantic Web (instead of Jans Aasman from Franz Inc.) Software Systems Group (STS) Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH) Hamburg-Harburg, Germany (and GmbH & Co. KG) 1 Flexible
More informationConverting a thesaurus into an ontology: the use case of URBISOC
Advanced Information Systems Laboratory Cost Action C2 Converting a thesaurus into an ontology: the use case of URBISOC J. Nogueras-Iso, J. Lacasta Alcalá de Henares, 4-5 May 2007 http://iaaa.cps.unizar.es
More informationOntologies and The Earth System Grid
Ontologies and The Earth System Grid Line Pouchard (ORNL) PI s: Ian Foster (ANL); Don Middleton (NCAR); and Dean Williams (LLNL) http://www.earthsystemgrid.org The NIEeS Workshop Cambridge, UK Overview:
More informationnrql Tutorial Systems & Co. KG Blumenau Hamburg Germany nrql Tutorial p.1/55
nrql Tutorial Systems & Co. KG Blumenau 50 22089 Hamburg Germany www.racer-systems.com nrql Tutorial p.1/55 Overview of Tutorial The nrql Query Language Introductory examples - why nrql? Syntax (query
More information