Monaco Concepts and IMRT / VMAT Planning LTAMON0003 / 3.0
|
|
- Samson Perry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 and IMRT / VMAT Planning LTAMON0003 / 3.0
2 and Planning Objectives By the end of this presentation you can: Describe the cost functions in Monaco and recognize their application in building a successful plan. Explain the sequencing parameters and how they affect planning. Produce IMRT and VMAT plans. 2 Focus where it matters
3 Advanced Monaco Contents Part 1: Monaco Concepts - Constrained Optimization - Voxels and Structure Layering - Biological Optimization - Cost Functions Serial Parallel Targets Settings Part 2: Sequencing Parameters Part 3: Monaco Planning Part 4: Multicriterial Planning 3 Focus where it matters
4 Monaco Templates Monaco is a template-based planning system What does this mean? Templates store beam geometries, calculation parameters, calculation settings, physician s intent, IMRT constraints, and so on. In a few clicks, the plan is ready for calculation. What are the benefits of template-based planning? Provides efficient ways to standardize the planning approach. With consistent templates, planning VMAT / IMRT is much easier. Decreases time to build plans. 4 Focus where it matters
5 Monaco Templates Class Solutions Templates can be used to create class solutions; a method of standardizing planning approaches across a whole clinic. Templates can be stored by delivery type and anatomical site. 5 Focus where it matters
6 Monaco Templates Class Solutions Templates can be imported and exported from your system with the Manage Templates option. - This allows for template sharing. - The use of predefined templates is in no way to be construed as Elekta acting in any way to provide medical direction or advice. Full responsibility of the clinical use of shared template(s) resides with the healthcare professional providing patient care services. 6 Focus where it matters
7 Monaco Templates Class Solutions Class solutions are prescription templates you can create for one patient and use on most others for a particular anatomical site. Class solutions are possible for the following reasons: - Patient geometries in a population do not vary much. - Constrained optimization guarantees consistency in most treatment goals. - Cost functions capture rules for ranking dose distributions correctly. - The definition of treatment goals is comprehensive. 7 Focus where it matters
8 Constrained Optimization The approach to optimization in Monaco is different to early inverse planning. In traditional systems, you create a plan to achieve target coverage then lower doses to organs at risk (OAR s) as a secondary process until the target coverage is compromised. With Monaco, the OAR doses (dose limiting cost functions) are prioritized and will be achieved before dose to targets (objective functions) are met. Only when the OAR doses are achieved will Monaco prioritize target objectives. 8 Focus where it matters
9 Constrained Optimization There may be limits to the target dose to achieve this. If the Target dose has not been met, it will typically be because an OAR or dose limiting cost function is too harsh. You have the option to relax or change the cost function or accept the lower target dose. 9 Focus where it matters
10 Constrained Optimization OAR PTV Compromise OAR PTV 10 Focus where it matters
11 Constrained Optimization OAR PTV OAR PTV 11 Focus where it matters
12 Constrained Optimization Constrained Optimization is a more structured and logical way to plan. As Monaco has completed the OAR constraints problem, Monaco is able to inform where conflicts are and highlight which cost functions are affecting the dose to targets. This gives you power in terms of optimization. There is no guess work in what to change to achieve the target objective. This is a more structured approach to planning and leads to less iterations. 12 Focus where it matters
13 Constrained Optimization The Children's Party Think of constrained optimization as if it were a children's party at feeding time. On one side of the Table, we sit the big children, our Targets. On the other side, we sit the small children, our OARs. We put all the food in the middle and allow the small children to get what they want first. When they have their food, we allow the big kids to eat. 13 Focus where it matters
14 Constrained Optimization The Children's Party If one of our big children does not have enough food, we can look at our small children and know which of our small children has too much food and is preventing the big kid from eating. We have the decision of taking away from the small child to give to the big child. This is how Monaco works. The system gives you the information you need to complete your plan. 14 Focus where it matters
15 Constrained Optimization Its not quite that simple. There is an order in which cost function objectives or constraints must be met. Some of them (Quadratic Overdose) will be used in conjunction with target coverage and this can add a little confusion. So the next slide is important to understand how to plan on Monaco. 15 Focus where it matters
16 Constrained Optimization 1st Order Constraints Goal will always be met. Serial, Parallel, Quadratic Overdose, Max Dose 2nd Order Constraints Goal will be met UNLESS there is a 1st Order constraint. Quadratic Under Dose, Under Dose DVH 1st Order Objective Goal will be met unless a 1 st or 2 nd Order Constraints prevents this. Target EUD, Target Penalty 2nd Order Objective Goal will be met or succeeded unless Constraints prevent and UNLESS 1 st objectives are not met. Cost functions that have Multi Criterial option order 16 Focus where it matters
17 Constrained Optimization How does constrained optimization make it easier to produce a plan? How does Monaco tell us where the conflicts are? Lets take a look at an example. 17 Focus where it matters
18 Constrained Optimization After Stage 1 calculation look for areas of high weight and impact. Try to get these as low as you can. Values around 1 2 show a reasonable return in plan quality in Stage 2. Look for areas where there is low weight and impact. These areas can be reduced to make the plan work harder. When you are happy with Stage 1 calculation, calculate Stage Focus where it matters
19 Constrained Optimization The IMRT constraints tab is a key source of information for the planner. This is where you can see how your plan is performing. Locate conflicts and adjust parameters in order to achieve your goal. Most of your planning time will be spent in this tab. 19 Focus where it matters
20 Constrained Optimization After the plan has run through to Stage 2, you can review the dose. Note how PTVnx is under the required dose. Now, use the constrained optimization concept in the IMRT constraints to resolve this. 20 Focus where it matters
21 Constrained Optimization Note the Isoeffect for the PTVnx is under the Isoconstraint this is confirming what we saw in the DVH statistics. The rest of the targets look pretty good and their impact and weight are relatively low. This tells us, it is not the targets that are impacting on each others coverage. On the whole, the cost functions (CF s) in the targets are relatively good. 21 Focus where it matters
22 Constrained Optimization The dose limiting cost functions of the Targets are not restricting dose to PTVnx, so we can focus on the OARs. Note the high weight and relative impact for the brainstem. This is the system informing us that the brainstem is restricting dose to the target. This is the indicator from constrained optimization. 22 Focus where it matters
23 Constrained Optimization Look closer and you can see the parotids and optic nerves are also a problem. In this case, our body constraint is also too tight. Let s focus on this structure initially. We want target coverage but not at the expense of our OAR. 23 Focus where it matters
24 Constrained Optimization If we primarily focus on the body quadratic overdose of 54Gy, we can see the high weight of This cost function is controlling dose to the patient. This weight suggests that the body structure comes into close proximity to PTVnx. 24 Focus where it matters
25 Constrained Optimization With the constrained optimization concept, expect the PTVnx dose to increase and the weight to decrease. Once this is done, re-run the calculation. There is no need to change anything else at this stage. Doing one step at a time will speed up the calculation and make it easier to understand your changes. Repeat this step until the weight and impact has significantly reduced or when you are no longer happy with the dose to the body. 25 Focus where it matters
26 Constrained Optimization As expected, PTVnx coverage has improved. The weight and relative impact of this cost function has reduced. If we look again, we can see the 30Gy quadratic overdose now has a high weight. Repeat the process with this cost function. 26 Focus where it matters
27 Constrained Optimization To recap: - Dose limiting cost functions will always be achieved. - Only when these are met will dose to the targets be prioritized. - Use this to your advantage and follow the clues. - The weight, isoeffect, and relative impact on the IMRT constraints is your key to identifying conflicts and achieving your planning objectives. 27 Focus where it matters
28 Voxels and Structure Layering Monaco is a voxel-based planning system. The entire volume is split into tiny voxels. The advantage is being able to control voxels and not structures. The voxels extend out from the isocenter and are based on the grid size. The finer the grid size, the greater the number of voxels. 28 Focus where it matters
29 Voxels and Structure Layering By optimizing voxels rather than contours, we reduce the need for additional help contours seen in more primitive systems. This gives us simpler prescriptions, a faster overall planning time, and a more intuitive planning experience. Especially, in conjunction with constrained optimization. 29 Focus where it matters
30 Voxels and Structure Layering Since Monaco is a voxel-based planning system, there are multiple voxel-based tools that also give useful feedback. The means the feedback received in constrained optimization is not limited to the IMRT constraints tab. This is an example of the Variation tool. 30 Focus where it matters
31 Voxels and Structure Layering PTV 1. PTV higher in layering order than Rectum. Rectum PTV Rectum 2. Rectum higher in layering order than PTV. PTV 2a. Rectum optimized over all voxels. Rectum PTV2 PTV1 3. PTV2 higher in layering order than PTV1. 31 Focus where it matters
32 Biological Optimization Accounts for the response of tissues to dose as well as the volume effect of organs using Equivalent Uniform Dose. This means that the biological based cost functions ensure the required dose volume affect is achieved. It is a more intuitive way to plan for improved dose distributions compared to the traditional DVH physical point methods. 32 Focus where it matters 32
33 Biological Optimization The Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) represents the dose that causes the same effect if applied homogeneously to the entire organ volume. Stated another way, the EUD represents any two or more dose distributions that yield the same radio-biological effect. In Monaco, it is expressed as the Isoconstraint and Isoeffect. The Isoconstraint is the EUD you are asking for. The Isoeffect is the calculated EUD, or what you are getting. 33 Focus where it matters
34 Biological Optimization EUD is similar to the mathematical concept of an average. That is why the Isoeffect may or may not match your DVH statistics. While you may not be able to evaluate your plan directly using Isoeffect, the concept of EUD is a useful planning tool when combined with the logical concept of constrained optimization. 34 Focus where it matters
35 Biological Optimization To manage this in Monaco, we work on the theory there are two types of biological responses to radiation exhibited by normal tissue. Monaco is able to take these responses into account while optimizing to ensure the best possible outcomes for the patient. The two dose limiting cost functions are based on two types of organs. 35 Focus where it matters
36 Biological Optimization Serial OAR s Will not function once any of the volume has received a maximum dose Example: Spinal Cord Parallel OAR s Will not function once a % of the volume has received a specific dose or if they are paired organs where one of the organs will compensate for loss of function in the damaged organ Example: Lungs, kidney 36 Focus where it matters
37 Biological Optimization Serial is represented by the chain because when one link breaks, the chain is broken. If you irradiate a small portion to a high dose, the organ no longer functions regardless of the volume that receives a low dose. Parallel is represented by the rope because you can break some strands, but it will still function. There is a point where you break too many strands and the rope becomes useless. Parallel organs respond to radiation in the same way. There are also organs like the rectum that although technically are serial there is a dose volume response as well so they may have both parallel and serial constraints to take care of the high dose and restrict the volume receiving a certain dose. 37 Focus where it matters
38 Biological Optimization The serial constraint allows the optimizer to put its resources into constraining a max dose to keep hot spots under control but still work to reduce the high dose. This DVH shows use of Monaco Serial constraint on the spinal cord and brainstem vs. another systems plan using maximum dose. Both achieve the specified max dose but the Monaco plan spares significantly more cord and brainstem for the same dose to the target. Monaco Solid Line Other Anonymous TPS - Dashed Line 38 Focus where it matters
39 Biological Optimization The parallel constraint controls the dose to a specified portion of the organ while allowing overlapping target structures to receive the prescribed dose. This DVH shows use of Monaco parallel constraint to control the dose to the bladder while maintaining dose to the target and significantly improving the dose to the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) in this case. Monaco Solid Line Other Anonymous TPS - Dashed Line 39 Focus where it matters
40 Biological Optimization In the simplest terms, biological optimization is a much simpler method of controlling and achieving the required DVH. We control them changing the EUD and with a power law exponent value. Before we come to that though, it is important to understand how the EUD works for both cost functions. - For target EUD, target penalty, and serial cost functions, the isoconstraint/effect is a dose unit. - For parallel cost function, the Isoconstraint/effect is a volume. 40 Focus where it matters
41 Cost Functions Serial To control the serial, you can change the EUD value. Remember the EUD value is not a max dose, therefore the value set may not give you the max you require but more the dose effect. PTV 70 Gy EUD 32 Gy EUD 36 Gy EUD 40 Gy (k = 12 for this example) Slide information courtesy of M. Alber Focus where it matters
42 Cost Functions Serial 42 Focus where it matters Decreasing the EUD (Isoconstraint) will decrease the Maximum Dose
43 Cost Functions Serial 43 Focus where it matters Decreasing the EUD (Isoconstraint) will decrease the Maximum Dose
44 Volume Monaco Concepts Cost Functions Serial This diagram shows a common effect of a physical cost function in other treatment planning systems. This can be achieved with physical cost functions within Monaco. But as we will learn, the biological cost functions prove a more powerful planning tool. Maximum Dose Cost Function (Controls only a single point on DVH) Spinal Cord < 45 Gy 45 Gy 44 Focus where it matters 44
45 Volume Monaco Concepts Cost Functions Serial With one cost function, we are controlling much more of the DVH. By selecting a suitable EUD value, we are able to achieve the max dose effect and impact on the lower doses in the volume. EUD-based Serial Cost Function (Controls many points on DVH, emphasis on high doses) Spinal Cord EUD < 35 Gy dose 45 Focus where it matters 45
46 Cost Functions Serial The voxel-based tool Variation shows where the cost function is applied and you can see the effect upon the DVH and where the cost function is being applied. 46 Focus where it matters
47 Cost Functions Serial You have seen how the EUD effects the cost function, but the real strength comes from the Power Law Exponent (PLE) or K Value. The K value (PLE) works different for the serial and parallel. The K value (PLE) for the serial cost function ranges from 1 through Focus where it matters
48 Cost Functions Serial A Power Law Exponent (PLE) or K value of 1 will apply evenly across the whole curve. This will give a mean dose effect. 48 Focus where it matters 48
49 Cost Functions Serial A Power Law Exponent (PLE) or K value of 10 will apply more towards the maximum end of the curve. 49 Focus where it matters 49
50 Cost Functions Serial A Power Law Exponent or K value of 20 will exhibit much more of a maximum dose effect. 50 Focus where it matters 50
51 Cost Functions Serial The Variation tool shows where the cost function is applying. The image below shows the larynx. As you can see, the CF is applying evenly across the structure giving the mean dose. 51 Focus where it matters
52 Cost Functions Serial Similarly, the variation will show where the cost function is applying. Note how it applies more towards the high dose Planning Target Volume (PTV). 52 Focus where it matters
53 Volume Monaco Concepts Cost Functions Parallel A Monaco parallel cost function applies over a much greater area giving you much more control over the DVH curve. 50 % Parallel Model Cost Function (Controls many points on DVH, emphasis on mean dose) 30 Gy dose 53 Focus where it matters
54 Biological Optimization Parallel 54
55 Cost Functions Parallel The Power Law Exponent or K value for the parallel affects the cost function different to the serial cost function. The values range from 1-4 and there can be a decimal increase. 55 Focus where it matters
56 Volume Monaco Concepts Cost Functions Parallel This is an example of a physical cost function. Note how it is only applying to one single point and we have no control above and below this value. 50 % DVH Cost Function (Physical - Controls only a single point on DVH) 50 % of parotid < 30 Gy 30 Gy dose 56 Focus where it matters
57 Volume Monaco Concepts Cost Functions Parallel In this example, we have asked for 30Gy at 50% with a K value of 1. The low K value applied evenly across the whole curve. 50 % 57 Focus where it matters 30 Gy dose 57
58 Volume Monaco Concepts Cost Functions Parallel A medium K value will apply more towards the values you have set but still has some control over the higher and lower doses. 50 % 58 Focus where it matters 30 Gy dose 58
59 Volume Monaco Concepts Cost Functions Parallel A high K value will apply more directly on the value you have selected and will not have any control above and below the selected values. It then starts to act more like a physical cost function. 50 % 59 Focus where it matters 30 Gy dose 59
60 Cost Functions Parallel The parallel can be tricky to use at times. If you use a low K value, be sure to compensate for that effect by reducing the values you require as the cost function will apply above and below the values. This will often incur a penalty on the target. - Although this will be highlighted by high weight and relative impact in the IMRT constraints tab. 50 % 30Gy 60 Focus where it matters
61 Cost Functions Parallel Ref dose 3500, mean Organ damage 40%, Power Law Exponent 4.0. Higher K value gives better target coverage. 61 Focus where it matters
62 Cost Functions Parallel Ref dose 3500, mean Organ damage 40%, Power Law Exponent (K value) 1.0. Low K gives better mean dose, but worse target coverage, because it works on entire curve, including high dose area. 62 Focus where it matters
63 Cost Functions Parallel The Variation tool shows the effect of the cost function within the structure and DVH. 63 Focus where it matters
64 Cost Functions Remember one rule does not fit all. The biological cost functions are a way to better control the DVH. Think about the effect you want, then assign the cost function with an EUD and a K value that will achieve it. 64 Focus where it matters
65 Cost Functions Targets There are two Target cost functions: - Biological cost function named Target EUD - Physical cost function named Target Penalty They react differently and these will be discussed next. 65 Focus where it matters
66 Cost Functions Target EUD Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) is the absorbed dose that, when homogeneously given to a tumor, yields the same mean surviving clonogen number as the given non-homogeneous irradiation. It allows the optimizer flexibility when searching for a good overall solution. Can be controlled by cell sensitivity. Increasing cell sensitivity decreases the volume that is allowed to be below the Prescription, but may not be achievable depending on other (hard) constraints. 66 Focus where it matters
67 Cost Functions Target Penalty Target Penalty is a physical cost function. It is an objective version of the Quadratic Underdose. It is a quadratic penalty constraint which starts at the threshold dose. The iso effect is a DVHbased physical parameter. Can result in a steeper Target DVH than an EUD-based cost function. 67 Focus where it matters
68 Cost Functions Targets There are different scenarios where both cost functions perform well. If the target is simple with minimal OAR, then the Target EUD works well. It also performs well in SBRT plans where a target dose max is not a requirement. If the plan requires more complexity, then the Target Penalty is the stronger performing cost function. The Target Penalty can also be worked harder by increasing the minimum volume %. 68 Focus where it matters
69 Cost Functions Quadratic Overdose The Quadratic Overdose allows a Max dose and an RMS excess to be set. The RMS is really just a dose tolerance. It is much more flexible than a hard max and gives the system room to breath. 69 Focus where it matters
70 Cost Functions Quadratic Overdose This shows the difference between using a Target Penalty with and without a Quadratic Overdose controlling hot spots. 70 Focus where it matters
71 Cost Functions Quadratic Overdose The Quadratic Overdose is a powerful cost function that can be used to control multiple areas of the plan. The RMS is a key value to allow flexibility. Remember you will know if the values you have set are working because the weight and relative impact from constrained optimization will tell you. 71 Focus where it matters
72 Cost Functions Maximum Dose Maximum Dose is a hard constraint. No penalty is applied until the threshold dose. Very inflexible when compared to Biological cost functions. Can be used to control the global max when applied to the external contour and optimize over all voxels is selected. 72 Focus where it matters
73 Cost Functions Monte Carlo Monte Carlo can result in more small hot spots. Try not to be too harsh on these, remember it is a more accurate representation of actual patient dose. Most protocols are moving towards a volume maximum rather than a point dose max because of this. 73 Focus where it matters
74 Cost Functions Monte Carlo Densities > 3.0g/cm3 Although the appropriate range for use is 0-3 g/cm3, the patient CT and CT to ED tables may generate RED values as high as 15 g/cm3. The user must be cognizant of the dose calculation inaccuracies associated with use of values out of the appropriate range. - Appreciate that the max doses in or near high density structures have a degree of error in the calculated dose. - Do not let these false hotspots contribute to the penalty applied to the cost function you have chosen to control overall maximums, which may inadvertently suppress plan quality and target coverage. 74 Focus where it matters
75 Cost Functions Monte Carlo Statistical Uncertainty There are two options to calculate the statistical uncertainty: - Statistical Uncertainty Per Control Point Is the Percentage uncertainty per voxel on a per segment basis you are willing to accept. - Statistical Uncertainty Per Calculation Is the Percentage uncertainty you are willing to accept per calculation. Using the Per Calculation method is generally better as the calculation time is faster due to a lower number of histories. Default value is 1% per calculation. - Lower values can be helpful when planning cases with low density structures. 75 Focus where it matters
76 Cost Functions Controlling Hot Spots There are several methods of controlling hot spots in Monaco. Remember to consider the Monte Carlo effect. Quadratic Overdose can control maximum dose within targets well. It is more flexible than the maximum dose cost function. Maximum Dose is useful when used on the external contour with apply over all voxels enabled. This controls the global max. 76 Focus where it matters
77 Cost Functions Controlling Hot Spots To use the maximum dose to control the global max dose, apply it to the external contour. Use the Optimize over all voxels in volume option to apply it to all voxels in the study set. This applies a global ceiling to the optimization. 77 Focus where it matters
78 Cost Functions The Shrink Margin The Shrink Margin removes voxels in a structure away from adjacent targets. These voxels will not be used by the cost function for optimization. Extremely useful when multiple targets are being optimized to transition between a high dose and a low dose. Can be used in place of Optimization rings. Allows a transition zone between a high dose target and an overlapping or adjacent OAR. 78 Focus where it matters
79 Cost Functions The Shrink Margin Multiple Targets 79 Focus where it matters
80 Cost Functions The Shrink Margin For the transition zone from PTV76 to PTV45, we apply two different Quadratic Overdose. One has a zero shrink margin and is set to the higher dose target. This will work to keep the high dose inside the target. The second Quadratic Overdose has a shrink margin of 0.6cm applied and a lower dose value. This will work to keep the dose inside the structure homogeneous. 80 Focus where it matters
81 Cost Functions The Shrink Margin Multiple Targets 81 Focus where it matters
82 Cost Functions The Shrink Margin Multiple Targets The Shrink margin applied should always be divisible by the grid size. If not, there maybe an over or under estimation of the margin applied. Remember if the values are not working you will have an idea of this by the weight, relative impact, and by using the Voxel tools. 82 Focus where it matters
83 Cost Functions Conformality The purpose of the dose conformality cost function is to shape the high dose volume tightly around one or several target volumes without being too restrictive to the optimum dose. The concept of the dose conformality cost function is novel in two ways: - The cost function uses local importance weights that depend on the distance of a voxel to the nearest target volume and the dose prescribed to this voxel to modify the local effectiveness of the cost function. - The cost function does not require an absolute iso-constraint for prescription, which would be difficult to determine. Instead, it estimates a feasible measure of dose conformality for each case, and then requires you to prescribe how much more or less conformal the dose distribution should be than this estimate. Hence, it requires only a relative iso-constraint out requiring too many defined parameters. 83 Focus where it matters
84 Cost Functions Conformality This means the cost function is going to squeeze dose into the target by penalizing voxels further away. The cost function can optimize over a 4cm radius or an 8cm. - This is adjusted by selecting the Optimize over all voxels option. Values can be set from A good starting point is The value can then be lowered until the desired conformity. 84 Focus where it matters
85 Cost Functions Conformality Conformality works well for single target volumes and stereo volumes. It can struggle more with complex head and neck plans. - This is due to multiple dose volumes as well as additional structures and large changes in the patient geometry (remember if conformality is applied to the patient, higher structures will own the voxels). 85 Focus where it matters
86 Cost Functions Controlling conformity with Quadratic Overdose You can control the dose to the patient by using the quadratic overdose cost functions and a series of stepped shrink margins. The shrink margins are used instead of optimization contours. Start with a value close to the PTV target dose with a small RMS value. 86 Focus where it matters
87 Cost Functions Controlling conformity with Quadratic Overdose The first quadratic overdose is set to the same value as the target dose with no shrink margin. The cost function is applying directly against the PTV keeping the target dose inside the target. 87 Focus where it matters
88 Cost Functions Controlling conformity with Quadratic Overdose The second quadratic overdose is set to a smaller dose value and has a shrink margin of 0.9cm applied. This is not applying in the voxels 0.9cm to the target. It only applies its penalty in the colored voxels. 88 Focus where it matters
89 Cost Functions Controlling conformity with Quadratic Overdose The third quadratic overdose is set to an even smaller dose value and has a shrink margin of 2.4cm applied. This is not applying in the voxels 2.4cm to the target. Again, it only applies its penalty in the colored voxels. 89 Focus where it matters
90 Cost Functions Controlling conformity with Quadratic Overdose You can adjust the values in Stage 1 until weight and relative impact is involved. At this point, you know you have reasonable values and the cost functions are working. The values set may need adjusting for the Stage 2 calculation. However, the system will tell you this through the constrained optimization. 90 Focus where it matters
91 Monaco Planning Sequencing The sequencing parameters will affect the quality AND deliverability of your plan just as much as the constraints will. Sequencing parameters will define and shape control points/segments as defined in the above workflow. The following slides will help to explain and review the parameters as well as give some tips. 91 Focus where it matters 91
92 Monaco Planning Cost Functions The Surface Margin The Surface Margin is available for Target cost functions. It is designed to limit the need for clipping contours at the patient surface. The surface margin allows the system to ignore low doses in the build up region. Meaning the system does not try to force dose into the build up region. 92 Focus where it matters
93 Monaco Planning Cost Functions The Surface Margin Where targets are drawn out to the patient surface and the margin is applied there may be a drop in coverage because the system is not forcing dose there. The advantage of the surface Margin is a decrease in MU and a decrease in the global max dose. The Physician should try to avoid drawing targets to the skin surface. 93 Focus where it matters
94 Monaco Planning Cost Functions The Surface Margin 94 Focus where it matters
95 Monaco Planning Cost Functions The Surface Margin 95 Focus where it matters
96 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Target Margin If you apply a larger margin, Monaco assigns more of the surrounding voxels to the target in optimization. If you apply a smaller margin, Monaco assigns fewer surrounding voxels to the target in optimization. 96 Focus where it matters
97 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Target Margin For normal planning, try not to restrict the margin too tight, this can affect the sequencing result. Normal Tight Very Tight 97 Focus where it matters 97
98 Monaco Planning Sequencing and Parameters Segment Shape Optimization When Segment Shape Optimization is selected, the optimizer has the freedom to move the MLC leaves to better meet the IMRT Constraints, starting with the open field as designated by the Target and Avoidance margins. The MLCs may only move +/- 1 mm for each SSO loop and the optimizer will use up to five SSO loops allowing for a maximum of +/- 5 mm from the original positions. This allows much improved plan quality and deliverability. 98 Focus where it matters
99 Monaco Planning Sequencing and Parameters Segment Shape Optimization Filter shapes changed in the Optimization Console. Do not make Stage 2 changes until 2-3 loops have occurred. This will give it a chance to converge prior to altering its optimization pathway. Skipping Forward will bypass SSO loops continuing. 99 Focus where it matters
100 Monaco Planning Sequencing and Parameters Control Points The Monaco Smart Sequencer is not limited by number of segments, nor segments per degree. This means that areas of high modulation can be provided where required and areas requiring less modulation to have less control points. The sequencer will always try to reduce the number of control points. 100 Focus where it matters
101 Monaco Planning Sequencing and Parameters Control Points The number of segments allowed should represent the complexity of the plan. For example, a head and neck will require more control points than a prostate. That said, give the system room to work out the modulation and always go slightly above the control points you require. Monaco will generally give less control points than the maximum set. 101 Focus where it matters
102 Monaco Planning Sequencing and Parameters Control Points Typically, 120 will work well for Prostates and will work for head and neck. Work these values out as part of commissioning which gives you the best plan quality, deliverability, and QA results. Increasing the Max Number of Control Points will increase calculation time. 102 Focus where it matters
103 Monaco Planning Sequencing and Parameters Number of Arcs There are two ways to set multiple rotations in Monaco. One method is to have two or more beams within the beam spreadsheet. Monaco will not allow duplicate beams so for example, if all parameters are the same, one must be defined clockwise and the other counter-clockwise. The advantage of this method is to allow collimator rotations and floor twist or to vary the increment setting per beam. 103 Focus where it matters
104 Monaco Planning Sequencing and Parameters Number of Arcs The second method is to allow two rotations of the same beam. This is done by setting the Max Number of Arcs to greater than 1. This method will automatically rotate the beam twice. It will export only one beam to MOSAIQ. 104 Focus where it matters
105 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Number of Arcs Do not be afraid of having multiple rotations. Remember having double the rotation does not mean double the delivery time. The number of segments does increase but the number of MUs is relatively the same. Although Monaco copes well with complex plans due to smart sequencing and only one full rotation. Allowing multiple arcs has several advantages. 105 Focus where it matters
106 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Number of Arcs When you add two Arcs rather than two beams, Monaco enhances the segmentation process. It essentially splits the fluence through the central X axis. On one rotation, Monaco will optimize one half of the volume. With the second rotation, Monaco will optimize the other half. Lets take a look at an example. 106 Focus where it matters
107 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Number of Arcs Take a prostate with nodes and a unilateral nodal volume: Monaco Optimizes and segments this half during the first Rotation. 107 Focus where it matters
108 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Number of Arcs Take a prostate with nodes and a unilateral nodal volume: Monaco Optimizes and segments this half during the second rotation. 108 Focus where it matters
109 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Number of Arcs If we look at the segment for 200 degrees on the first rotation, we can see the segments optimizing the right side of the volume. 109 Focus where it matters
110 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Number of Arcs The same gantry angle on the return rotation is segmenting the other side of the volume. 110 Focus where it matters
111 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Number of Arcs The effect of this is seen in the two plans below: 1 Arc 2 Beams 1 Beam 2 Arcs Note how the dose between the unilateral volumes is better. 111 Focus where it matters
112 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters The Increment Value The increment value splits the beam into a series of sectors. Each sector represents one sweep of the sweep sequencer. Number of sector in a full rotation = arc / Inc 112 Focus where it matters 112
113 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters The Increment Value Prior to Stage 1, the system divides the arc into sectors to simulate the arc during Stage 1. The number of sectors is determined by diving the total arc degree by the increment value. For example, a 360 arc with a 30 degree increment equals 12 sectors. 113 Focus where it matters
114 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters The Increment Value The sectors are created in 30 degree increments starting 15 degrees in front and after each angle. Generally, the treatment starts at 180 degrees so the first sector is split. 114 Focus where it matters
115 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Sweep Sequencer The sweep sequencer moved the leaves from their start to end position in a continuous, uni-directional manner. The length that they do this is determined by the sector. From the first sector, the leaves will sweep to the left direction of the BEV then change to the left as sectors alternate. Therefore the increment value is key. A starting value of 30 generally works well, lowering to 20 for more complex volumes. - Lowering the sweep sequencer allows time for the MLC to move and modulate to accommodate the complex target. 115 Focus where it matters
116 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Beamlet Width Beamlet width is used during Stage 1 to define the resolution of the fluence map. In Stage 2, you use it during SSO to fine tune the segment shapes. The smaller the beamlet width, the finer the fluence grid. A good starting point for most plans is The fluence length is determined by the MLC left width. 116 Focus where it matters
117 Monaco Planning Sequencing Parameters Beamlet Width Note the difference between the two resolutions. The plan quality maybe improved by using a finer grid, but there will likely be more smaller segments. 117 Focus where it matters
118 Monaco Planning Building a Simple Prostate Plan Lets follow this theory and apply it to a simple prostate plan. We will keep beam and segmentation parameters simple and focus on cost functions. General rules: - Keep things simple. - If a cost function is not required, do not put it in. - If its already there and not needed, take it out. 118 Focus where it matters
119 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Prostate Plan 119 Focus where it matters
120 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Prostate Plan Parameters 120 Focus where it matters 120
121 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Prostate Plan Keep the Constraints simple. In this example, we have gone for a Target Penalty. Remember the Target Penalty works best when adjacent to the OAR. Enter the Rx dose and coverage required. 121 Focus where it matters 121
122 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Prostate Plan To control the max dose to the target, we are going to add a Quadratic Overdose to the PTV Structure. We have gone 1Gy above the target as the reference dose and the RMS of 1.5Gy. This means that we are saying the PTV is allowed to go above the Target dose by 1Gy. Plus an average of 1.5Gy higher than this. 122 Focus where it matters 122
123 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Prostate Plan To control the rectum dose, we are only using one Serial cost function. We have set the EUD at 45Gy and a K value (PLE) of 5. This will mean the cost function will apply at the low and high doses. A shrink margin has been used to reduce conflict with Target coverage. 123 Focus where it matters 123
124 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Prostate Plan To control the bladder dose, we are also only using one serial cost function. This time we have set the EUD at 52Gy and a K value of 8. Optimize over all voxels is being used here. This means the voxels in the overlap region will be shared with the PTV Target Penalty cost function. 124 Focus where it matters 124
125 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Monaco Plan For the Patient dose, we have multiple approaches. A Quadratic Overdose of the target dose plus a very minimal RMS. This will ensure coverage but make sure target dose stays within the target. The Max dose cost function is being used with an optimize over all voxels and has been set to limit the global maximum dose. 125 Focus where it matters 125
126 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Monaco Plan Focus first on the Isoconstraint and the Isoeffect. The Isoconstraint tells us what we asked the system for. The Isoeffect is the observed result. With Constraint Optimization, we know the Isoconstraint will ALWAYS be met for Dose Limiting cost functions. 126 Focus where it matters 126
127 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Monaco Plan We can see that the Isoeffect for the target penalty is lower than the Isoconstraint. This indicates that the target dose has not been met. Therefore, an OAR or quadratic overdose on the patient or Target must be preventing it. This will be indicated by a high weight. 127 Focus where it matters 127
128 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Monaco Plan So if the theory is correct we can increase the isoconstraint on the PTV Quadratic Overdose and our coverage will improve. 128 Focus where it matters 128
129 Monaco Planning Build a Simple Monaco Plan We increased the QO in 0.1 Gy step increments until we reached our objectives. Note how the weight has decreased and isoeffect on the target penalty increased. Our PTV coverage has also increased. 129 Focus where it matters 129
130 Thank you
Monaco VMAT. The Next Generation in IMRT/VMAT Planning. Paulo Mathias Customer Support TPS Application
Monaco VMAT The Next Generation in IMRT/VMAT Planning Paulo Mathias Customer Support TPS Application 11.05.2011 Background What is Monaco? Advanced IMRT/VMAT treatment planning system from Elekta Software
More informationHow would, or how does, the patient position (chin extended) affect your beam arrangement?
1 Megan Sullivan Clinical Practicum II Parotid Lab July 29, 2016 PLAN 1: IPSILATERAL WEDGE PAIR TECHNIQUE The ipsilateral wedge pair technique consisted of an anterior oblique field at 45 degrees and a
More information7/29/2017. Making Better IMRT Plans Using a New Direct Aperture Optimization Approach. Aim of Radiotherapy Research. Aim of Radiotherapy Research
Making Better IMRT Plans Using a New Direct Aperture Optimization Approach Dan Nguyen, Ph.D. Division of Medical Physics and Engineering Department of Radiation Oncology UT Southwestern AAPM Annual Meeting
More informationHugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France. Sunday 17 July 2016
Hugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France Sunday 17 July 2016 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Material 3. Optimization process 4. Results 5. Comments 6. Conclusion
More informationIMSURE QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE QA SOFTWARE
QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE Software for accurate and independent verification of monitor units, dose, and overall validity of standard, IMRT, VMAT, SRS and brachytherapy plans no film, no phantoms, no linac
More informationRadiation therapy treatment plan optimization
H. Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan MOPTA Lehigh University August 18 20, 2010 Outline 1 Introduction Radiation therapy delivery 2 Treatment
More informationCreating a Knowledge Based Model using RapidPlan TM : The Henry Ford Experience
DVH Estimates Creating a Knowledge Based Model using RapidPlan TM : The Henry Ford Experience Karen Chin Snyder, MS, DABR AAMD Region V Meeting October 4, 2014 Disclosures The Department of Radiation Oncology
More informationIMRT site-specific procedure: Prostate (CHHiP)
IMRT site-specific procedure: Prostate (CHHiP) Scope: To provide site specific instructions for the planning of CHHIP IMRT patients Responsibilities: Radiotherapy Physicists, HPC Registered Therapy Radiographers
More informationTomotherapy Physics. Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance. Emilie Soisson, MS
Tomotherapy Physics Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance Emilie Soisson, MS Tomotherapy at UW- Madison Treating for nearly 5 years Up to ~45 patients a day on 2 tomo units Units twinned to facilitate
More informationThe MSKCC Approach to IMRT. Outline
The MSKCC Approach to IMRT Spiridon V. Spirou, PhD Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY Outline Optimization Field splitting Delivery Independent verification
More informationAn experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 13, NUMBER 4, 2012 An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors
More informationADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT
3 ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT SUPPORTING CLINICS WORLDWIDE RaySearch is advancing cancer treatment through pioneering software. We believe software has un limited potential, and that it is now the driving
More informationICARO Vienna April Implementing 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT in clinical practice: Recommendations of IAEA- TECDOC-1588
ICARO Vienna April 27-29 2009 Implementing 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT in clinical practice: Recommendations of IAEA- TECDOC-1588 M. Saiful Huq, Ph.D., Professor and Director, Dept. of Radiation
More informationFAST, precise. qa software
qa software FAST, precise Software for accurate and independent verification of monitor units, dose, and overall validity of standard, IMRT, rotational or brachytherapy plans no film, no phantoms, no linac
More informationADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT
The RayPlan treatment planning system makes proven, innovative RayStation technology accessible to clinics that need a cost-effective and streamlined solution. Fast, efficient and straightforward to use,
More informationRadiotherapy Plan Competition TomoTherapy Planning System. Dmytro Synchuk. Ukrainian Center of TomoTherapy, Kirovograd, Ukraine
Radiotherapy Plan Competition 2016 TomoTherapy Planning System Dmytro Synchuk Ukrainian Center of TomoTherapy, Kirovograd, Ukraine Beam Geometry 6MV fan beam 3 jaw options 1.0, 2.5 and 5 cm 64 leaves binary
More informationVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Implementation. Outline. Acknowledgement. History of VMAT. IMAT Basics of IMAT
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Implementation Daliang Cao, PhD, DABR Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA Acknowledgement David M. Shepard, Ph.D. Muhammad K. N. Afghan, Ph.D. Fan Chen, Ph.D.
More informationBasic Radiation Oncology Physics
Basic Radiation Oncology Physics T. Ganesh, Ph.D., DABR Chief Medical Physicist Fortis Memorial Research Institute Gurgaon Acknowledgment: I gratefully acknowledge the IAEA resources of teaching slides
More informationOptimization in Brachytherapy. Gary A. Ezzell, Ph.D. Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Optimization in Brachytherapy Gary A. Ezzell, Ph.D. Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Outline General concepts of optimization Classes of optimization techniques Concepts underlying some commonly available methods
More informationInteractive Treatment Planning in Cancer Radiotherapy
Interactive Treatment Planning in Cancer Radiotherapy Mohammad Shakourifar Giulio Trigila Pooyan Shirvani Ghomi Abraham Abebe Sarah Couzens Laura Noreña Wenling Shang June 29, 212 1 Introduction Intensity
More informationCHAPTER 9 INFLUENCE OF SMOOTHING ALGORITHMS IN MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATIONS OF CYBERKNIFE TREATMENT PLANS: A LUNG PHANTOM STUDY
148 CHAPTER 9 INFLUENCE OF SMOOTHING ALGORITHMS IN MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATIONS OF CYBERKNIFE TREATMENT PLANS: A LUNG PHANTOM STUDY 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.1.1 Dose Calculation Algorithms Dose calculation
More information8/4/2016. Emerging Linac based SRS/SBRT Technologies with Modulated Arc Delivery. Disclosure. Introduction: Treatment delivery techniques
Emerging Linac based SRS/SBRT Technologies with Modulated Arc Delivery Lei Ren, Ph.D. Duke University Medical Center 2016 AAPM 58 th annual meeting, Educational Course, Therapy Track Disclosure I have
More informationUsing a research real-time control interface to go beyond dynamic MLC tracking
in partnership with Using a research real-time control interface to go beyond dynamic MLC tracking Dr. Simeon Nill Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden
More informationCurrent state of multi-criteria treatment planning
Current state of multi-criteria treatment planning June 11, 2010 Fall River NE AAPM meeting David Craft Massachusetts General Hospital Talk outline - Overview of optimization - Multi-criteria optimization
More informationGPU applications in Cancer Radiation Therapy at UCSD. Steve Jiang, UCSD Radiation Oncology Amit Majumdar, SDSC Dongju (DJ) Choi, SDSC
GPU applications in Cancer Radiation Therapy at UCSD Steve Jiang, UCSD Radiation Oncology Amit Majumdar, SDSC Dongju (DJ) Choi, SDSC Conventional Radiotherapy SIMULATION: Construciton, Dij Days PLANNING:
More informationCoverage based treatment planning to accommodate organ deformable motions and contouring uncertainties for prostate treatment. Huijun Xu, Ph.D.
Coverage based treatment planning to accommodate organ deformable motions and contouring uncertainties for prostate treatment Huijun Xu, Ph.D. Acknowledgement and Disclosure Dr. Jeffrey Siebers Dr. DJ
More informationApplied Optimization Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
Applied Optimization Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) 2009-05-08 Caroline Olsson, M.Sc. Topics History of radiotherapy Developments that has led to IMRT The IMRT process How
More informationIterative regularization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy optimization. Carlsson, F. and Forsgren, A. Med. Phys. 33 (1), January 2006.
Iterative regularization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy optimization Carlsson, F. and Forsgren, A. Med. Phys. 33 (1), January 2006. 2 / 15 Plan 1 2 3 4 3 / 15 to paper The purpose of the paper
More informationAcknowledgments. Ping Xia, Ph.D., UCSF. Pam Akazawa, CMD, UCSF. Cynthia Chuang, Ph.D., UCSF
Page 1 Quality Assurance of IMRT Delivery Systems - Siemens Lynn J. Verhey, Ph.D. Professor and Vice-Chair UCSF Dept. of Radiation Oncology AAPM 22 Annual Meeting, Montreal Acknowledgments Ping Xia, Ph.D.,
More informationROBUST OPTIMIZATION THE END OF PTV AND THE BEGINNING OF SMART DOSE CLOUD. Moe Siddiqui, April 08, 2017
ROBUST OPTIMIZATION THE END OF PTV AND THE BEGINNING OF SMART DOSE CLOUD Moe Siddiqui, April 08, 2017 Agenda Background IRCU 50 - Disclaimer - Uncertainties Robust optimization Use Cases Lung Robust 4D
More informationTitle: Toward Truly Optimal IMRT Dose Distribution: Inverse Planning with Voxel- Specific Penalty
Type of the article: Original article Title: Toward Truly Optimal IMRT Dose Distribution: Inverse Planning with Voxel- Specific Penalty Authors: Pavel Lougovski (1), Jordan LeNoach (1), Lei Zhu (1), Yunzhi
More informationDose Calculations: Where and How to Calculate Dose. Allen Holder Trinity University.
Dose Calculations: Where and How to Calculate Dose Trinity University www.trinity.edu/aholder R. Acosta, W. Brick, A. Hanna, D. Lara, G. McQuilen, D. Nevin, P. Uhlig and B. Slater Dose Calculations - Why
More informationA Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System
A Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System Shabbir Ahmed, Ozan Gozbasi, Martin Savelsbergh Georgia Institute of Technology Ian Crocker, Tim Fox, Eduard Schreibmann Emory University
More informationVALIDATION OF DIR. Raj Varadhan, PhD, DABMP Minneapolis Radiation Oncology
VALIDATION OF DIR Raj Varadhan, PhD, DABMP Minneapolis Radiation Oncology Overview Basics: Registration Framework, Theory Discuss Validation techniques Using Synthetic CT data & Phantoms What metrics to
More informationIntegrated proton-photon treatment planning
Pinnacle 3 Proton Planning Integrated proton-photon treatment planning Philips Pinnacle 3 Proton Planning specifications Pinnacle 3 Proton Planning is designed to simplify treatment planning for proton
More informationA Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System
A Fully-Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System Shabbir Ahmed, Ozan Gozbasi, Martin Savelsbergh Georgia Institute of Technology Tim Fox, Ian Crocker, Eduard Schreibmann Emory University
More informationTreatment Planning Optimization for VMAT, Tomotherapy and Cyberknife
Treatment Planning Optimization for VMAT, Tomotherapy and Cyberknife Kerem Akartunalı Department of Management Science Strathclyde Business School Joint work with: Vicky Mak-Hau and Thu Tran 14 July 2015
More informationPhoton beam dose distributions in 2D
Photon beam dose distributions in 2D Sastry Vedam PhD DABR Introduction to Medical Physics III: Therapy Spring 2014 Acknowledgments! Narayan Sahoo PhD! Richard G Lane (Late) PhD 1 Overview! Evaluation
More informationSecondary 3D Dose QA Fully Automated using MOSAIQ's IQ Engine. MOSAIQ User Meeting May Antwerp
Secondary 3D Dose QA Fully Automated using MOSAIQ's IQ Engine MOSAIQ User Meeting May 31 2013 - Antwerp Contents Project goal and collaboration Secondary 3D Dose QA project justification Secondary 3D Dose
More informationIMRT and VMAT Patient Specific QA Using 2D and 3D Detector Arrays
IMRT and VMAT Patient Specific QA Using 2D and 3D Detector Arrays Sotiri Stathakis Outline Why IMRT/VMAT QA AAPM TG218 UPDATE Tolerance Limits and Methodologies for IMRT Verification QA Common sources
More informationNew Technology in Radiation Oncology. James E. Gaiser, Ph.D. DABR Physics and Computer Planning Charlotte, NC
New Technology in Radiation Oncology James E. Gaiser, Ph.D. DABR Physics and Computer Planning Charlotte, NC Technology s s everywhere From the imaging chain To the planning system To the linac To QA..it..it
More informationCONTOURING ACCURACY. What Have We Learned? And Where Do We Go From Here? BEN NELMS, PH.D. AUGUST 15, 2016
CONTOURING ACCURACY What Have We Learned? And Where Do We Go From Here? BEN NELMS, PH.D. AUGUST 15, 2016 FIRST THINGS FIRST Happy Medical Dosimetrist s Week! OUTLINE 1. Objectives 2. The importance of
More informationMapCHECK 2 & 3DVH. The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays
MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools THE GOLD STANDARD FOR 2D ARRAYS The MapCHECK 2 is the world s most selected independent 2D measurement array.
More informationMapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays
MapCHECK 2 & 3DVH The Gold Standard for 2D Arrays Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools THE GOLD STANDARD FOR 2D ARRAYS The MapCHECK 2 is the world s most selected independent 2D measurement array.
More informationDose Calculation and Optimization Algorithms: A Clinical Perspective
Dose Calculation and Optimization Algorithms: A Clinical Perspective Daryl P. Nazareth, PhD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY T. Rock Mackie, PhD University of Wisconsin-Madison David Shepard,
More informationMonte Carlo methods in proton beam radiation therapy. Harald Paganetti
Monte Carlo methods in proton beam radiation therapy Harald Paganetti Introduction: Proton Physics Electromagnetic energy loss of protons Distal distribution Dose [%] 120 100 80 60 40 p e p Ionization
More informationA hybrid framework for optimizing beam angles in radiation therapy planning
A hybrid framework for optimizing beam angles in radiation therapy planning Gino J. Lim and Laleh Kardar and Wenhua Cao December 29, 2013 Abstract The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to examine strengths
More informationTransitioning from pencil beam to Monte Carlo for electron dose calculations
Transitioning from pencil beam to Monte Carlo for electron dose calculations Jessie Huang-Vredevoogd (jyhuang4@wisc.edu) University of Wisconsin NCC AAPM October 12, 2019 1 Topics to cover Background RayStation
More informationChapter 9 Field Shaping: Scanning Beam
Chapter 9 Field Shaping: Scanning Beam X. Ronald Zhu, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX June 14-18, 2015 AAPM - Summer School 2015, Colorado Spring Acknowledgement
More informationComprehensive treatment planning for brachytherapy. Advanced planning made easy
Comprehensive treatment planning for brachytherapy Advanced planning made easy Oncentra Brachy offers a variety of smart tools that facilitate many of the repetitive tasks for you. In contemporary brachytherapy,
More informationApplied Optimization Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
Applied Optimization Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) 2008-05-08 Caroline Olsson, M.Sc. Topics Short history of radiotherapy Developments that has led to IMRT The IMRT process
More information3DVH : SUN NUCLEAR On The Accuracy Of The corporation Planned Dose Perturbation Algorithm Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools *Patent Pending
3DVH : On The Accuracy Of The Planned Dose Perturbation Algorithm SUN NUCLEAR corporation Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools *Patent Pending introduction State-of-the-art IMRT QA of static gantry
More informationNEW METHOD OF COLLECTING OUTPUT FACTORS FOR COMMISSIONING LINEAR ACCELERATORS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS
NEW METHOD OF COLLECTING OUTPUT FACTORS FOR COMMISSIONING LINEAR ACCELERATORS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON SMALL FIELDS AND INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY by Cindy D. Smith A Thesis Submitted to the
More informationApplied Optimization: Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
Applied Optimization: Application to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) 2010-05-04 Caroline Olsson, M.Sc. caroline.olsson@vgregion.se Topics History of radiotherapy Developments that has led
More informationarxiv: v3 [physics.med-ph] 6 Dec 2011
Multicriteria VMAT optimization David Craft, Dualta McQuaid, Jeremiah Wala, Wei Chen, Ehsan Salari, Thomas Bortfeld December 5, 2011 arxiv:1105.4109v3 [physics.med-ph] 6 Dec 2011 Abstract Purpose: To make
More informationReal-time monitoring of linac performance using RT plans and logfiles
Real-time monitoring of linac performance using RT plans and logfiles NCCAAPM Wisconsin Dells 7 April 2017 Mark Wiesmeyer, PhD, DABR Technical Product Manager Technical talk with insights and results based
More informationMachine and Physics Data Guide
WWW..COM Machine and Physics Data Guide STANDARD IMAGING, INC. 3120 Deming Way Middleton, WI 53562-1461 May / 2008 2008 Standard Imaging, Inc. TEL 800.261.4446 TEL 608.831.0025 FAX 608.831.2202 www.standardimaging.com
More informationInitial Clinical Experience with 3D Surface Image Guidance
Initial Clinical Experience with 3D Surface Image Guidance Amanda Havnen-Smith, Ph.D. Minneapolis Radiation Oncology Ridges Radiation Therapy Center Burnsville, MN April 20 th, 2012 Non-funded research
More informationBrilliance CT Big Bore.
1 2 2 There are two methods of RCCT acquisition in widespread clinical use: cine axial and helical. In RCCT with cine axial acquisition, repeat CT images are taken each couch position while recording respiration.
More informationTEPZZ Z754_7A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: A61N 5/10 ( )
(19) TEPZZ Z74_7A_T (11) EP 3 07 417 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: 0..16 Bulletin 16/ (1) Int Cl.: A61N / (06.01) (21) Application number: 16163147.8 (22) Date of filing:
More informationAnalysis of RapidArc optimization strategies using objective function values and dose-volume histograms
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1, WINTER 2010 Analysis of RapidArc optimization strategies using objective function values and dose-volume histograms Mike Oliver, a Isabelle
More information3DVH FAQs. What is PDP questions
3DVH FAQs What is PDP questions 1. Explain the PDP in layman terms. How does PDP work? a. Very simply, PDP uses measured diode data, and compares it to the expected treatment plan data. The differences
More informationDosimetric impact of the 160 MLC on head and neck IMRT treatments
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 15, NUMBER 6, 2014 Dosimetric impact of the 160 MLC on head and neck IMRT treatments Prema Rassiah-Szegedi, a Martin Szegedi, Vikren Sarkar, Seth Streitmatter,
More informationPerformance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning
Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning Ana Marıa Barragan Montero, a) and Kevin Souris Universite catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche
More informationMINIMAX OPTIMIZATION FOR HANDLING RANGE AND SETUP UNCERTAINTIES IN PROTON THERAPY
MINIMAX OPTIMIZATION FOR HANDLING RANGE AND SETUP UNCERTAINTIES IN PROTON THERAPY Albin FREDRIKSSON, Anders FORSGREN, and Björn HÅRDEMARK Technical Report TRITA-MAT-1-OS2 Department of Mathematics Royal
More informationAn Optimisation Model for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
An Optimisation Model for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Matthias Ehrgott Department of Engineering Science University of Auckland New Zealand m.ehrgott@auckland.ac.nz Abstract Intensity modulated
More informationTRAJECTORY- BASED TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY FOR CRANIAL RADIOSURGERY
TRAJECTORY- BASED TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY FOR CRANIAL RADIOSURGERY JAMES ROBAR, PHD, FCCPM LEE MACDONALD, MSC CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, PHD, MCCPM DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY, CANADA CLASS SOLUTIONS IN SRS/SRT
More informationAn optimization framework for conformal radiation treatment planning
An optimization framework for conformal radiation treatment planning Jinho Lim Michael C. Ferris Stephen J. Wright David M. Shepard Matthew A. Earl December 2002 Abstract An optimization framework for
More informationAnthropomorphic Verification of the Eclipse AAA Algorithm for Spine SBRT Treatments Involving Titanium Implants
Anthropomorphic Verification of the Eclipse AAA Algorithm for Spine SBRT Treatments Involving Titanium Implants Mike Grams Clinical Medical Physicist Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN NCCAAPM Meeting, April 17,
More informationAn Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo
An Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) refers to a suite of processes for simulating a posterior distribution based on a random (ie. monte carlo) process. In other
More informationDynalog data tool for IMRT plan verification
Dynalog data tool for IMRT plan verification Poster No.: R-0051 Congress: 2014 CSM Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: V. Sashin; FOOTSCRAY/AU Keywords: Computer applications, Radiation physics, Experimental,
More information10.1 Overview. Section 10.1: Overview. Section 10.2: Procedure for Generating Prisms. Section 10.3: Prism Meshing Options
Chapter 10. Generating Prisms This chapter describes the automatic and manual procedure for creating prisms in TGrid. It also discusses the solution to some common problems that you may face while creating
More informationGrupo Física Médica de Sevilla (CTS-233) Antonio Leal Plaza alplaza@us.es Dept. Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Fac. Medicina. Univ. Sevilla http://grupos.us.es/medicalphysics/ Overview Introduction to
More informationHigh Throughput Computing and Sampling Issues for Optimization in Radiotherapy
High Throughput Computing and Sampling Issues for Optimization in Radiotherapy Michael C. Ferris, University of Wisconsin Alexander Meeraus, GAMS Development Corporation Optimization Days, Montreal, May
More informationradiotherapy Andrew Godley, Ergun Ahunbay, Cheng Peng, and X. Allen Li NCAAPM Spring Meeting 2010 Madison, WI
GPU-Accelerated autosegmentation for adaptive radiotherapy Andrew Godley, Ergun Ahunbay, Cheng Peng, and X. Allen Li agodley@mcw.edu NCAAPM Spring Meeting 2010 Madison, WI Overview Motivation Adaptive
More information8/3/2017. Contour Assessment for Quality Assurance and Data Mining. Objective. Outline. Tom Purdie, PhD, MCCPM
Contour Assessment for Quality Assurance and Data Mining Tom Purdie, PhD, MCCPM Objective Understand the state-of-the-art in contour assessment for quality assurance including data mining-based techniques
More informationTHE WIRELESS PHANTOM PERFORM ACCURATE PATIENT QA IN LESS TIME THAN EVER!
THE WIRELESS PHANTOM PERFORM ACCURATE PATIENT QA IN LESS TIME THAN EVER! Confidence in complex treatments Modern radiation therapy uses complex plans with techniques such as IMRT, VMAT and Tomotherapy.
More informationA SYSTEM OF DOSIMETRIC CALCULATIONS
A SYSTEM OF DOSIMETRIC CALCULATIONS INTRODUCTION Dose calculation based on PDD and TAR have Limitations The dependence of PDD on SSD Not suitable for isocentric techniques TAR and SAR does not depend on
More informationOPTIMIZATION MODELS FOR RADIATION THERAPY: TREATMENT PLANNING AND PATIENT SCHEDULING
OPTIMIZATION MODELS FOR RADIATION THERAPY: TREATMENT PLANNING AND PATIENT SCHEDULING By CHUNHUA MEN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
More informationURGENT IMPORTANT FIELD SAFETY NOTIFICATION
Subject: Incorrect Movement of the Treatment Table Product: MOSAIQ Scope: Sites affected will be those: 1. Running MOSAIQ and, 2. Treating on linear accelerators with the RATM license Notification Released:
More informationDose Distributions. Purpose. Isodose distributions. To familiarize the resident with dose distributions and the factors that affect them
Dose Distributions George Starkschall, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Purpose To familiarize the resident with dose distributions and the factors that affect them
More informationA fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: A Monte Carlo study
A fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: A Monte Carlo study Indrin J. Chetty, a) Mihaela Rosu, Neelam Tyagi, Lon H. Marsh, Daniel
More informationA new quadratic optimization approach to beam angle optimization for fixed-field
A new quadratic optimization approach to beam angle optimization for fixed-field intensity modulated radiation therapy using compressed sensing Junbo Peng 1, Ailin Wu 2 and Lei Zhu 1,* 1 Department of
More informationSignificance of time-dependent geometries for Monte Carlo simulations in radiation therapy. Harald Paganetti
Significance of time-dependent geometries for Monte Carlo simulations in radiation therapy Harald Paganetti Modeling time dependent geometrical setups Key to 4D Monte Carlo: Geometry changes during the
More informationELECTRON DOSE KERNELS TO ACCOUNT FOR SECONDARY PARTICLE TRANSPORT IN DETERMINISTIC SIMULATIONS
Computational Medical Physics Working Group Workshop II, Sep 30 Oct 3, 2007 University of Florida (UF), Gainesville, Florida USA on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL (2007) ELECTRON DOSE
More informationApplication of polynomial chaos in proton therapy
Application of polynomial chaos in proton therapy Dose distributions, treatment parameters, robustness recipes & treatment planning Master Thesis S.R. van der Voort June, 215 Supervisors: Dr. Ir. D. Lathouwers
More informationThe first thing we ll need is some numbers. I m going to use the set of times and drug concentration levels in a patient s bloodstream given below.
Graphing in Excel featuring Excel 2007 1 A spreadsheet can be a powerful tool for analyzing and graphing data, but it works completely differently from the graphing calculator that you re used to. If you
More informationOPTIMIZATION METHODS IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING
OPTIMIZATION METHODS IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING By DIONNE M. ALEMAN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.med-ph] 26 Oct 2009
arxiv:0910.4934v1 [physics.med-ph] 26 Oct 2009 On the tradeoff between treatment time and plan quality in rotational arc radiation delivery 1. Introduction David Craft and Thomas Bortfeld Department of
More informationRaising the Bar in IMRT QA
MapCHECK 2TM Raising the Bar in IMRT QA The leader in quick and precise measurement of modulated radiotherapy beams Benefits Proven solution for film-less rotational delivery and IMRT QA - More than 1500
More informationInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores de Coimbra Institute of Systems Engineering and Computers INESC - Coimbra
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores de Coimbra Institute of Systems Engineering and Computers INESC - Coimbra Humberto Rocha Joana Matos Dias On the Optimization of Radiation Therapy Planning
More informationEvaluation of 3D Gamma index calculation implemented in two commercial dosimetry systems
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2015 Evaluation of 3D Gamma index calculation implemented
More informationTypes of Edges. Why Edge Detection? Types of Edges. Edge Detection. Gradient. Edge Detection
Why Edge Detection? How can an algorithm extract relevant information from an image that is enables the algorithm to recognize objects? The most important information for the interpretation of an image
More informationPhoton Dose Algorithms and Physics Data Modeling in modern RTP
Photon Dose Algorithms and Physics Data Modeling in modern RTP Niko Papanikolaou, PhD Professor and Director of Medical Physics University of Texas Health Science Center of San Antonio Cancer Therapy &
More informationCombining segment generation with direct step-and-shoot optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Combining segment generation with direct step-and-shoot optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy Fredrik CARLSSON Technical Report TRITA-MAT-2007-OS3 Department of Mathematics Royal Institute
More informationTomographic Reconstruction
Tomographic Reconstruction 3D Image Processing Torsten Möller Reading Gonzales + Woods, Chapter 5.11 2 Overview Physics History Reconstruction basic idea Radon transform Fourier-Slice theorem (Parallel-beam)
More informationCode of practice: Create a verification plan for OCTAVIUS Detector 729 in Philips Pinnacle³
Technical Note D655.208.03/00 Code of practice: Create a verification plan for OCTAVIUS Detector 729 in There are basically three ways to carry out verification of IMRT fluences. For all options, it is
More informationInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores de Coimbra Institute of Systems Engineering and Computers INESC - Coimbra
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores de Coimbra Institute of Systems Engineering and Computers INESC - Coimbra Humberto Rocha Brígida da Costa Ferreira Joana Matos Dias Maria do Carmo Lopes
More informationCurveCompare v1.0 INSTRUCTIONS
CurveCompare v1.0 INSTRUCTIONS Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Installation... 2 Platform... 2 Verifying (or Installing) the Necessary.NET Framework... 2 Downloading and Storing the CurveCompare Executable(s)...
More informationTracePro Tutorial Tissue Optics
TracePro Tutorial Tissue Optics Splitting the Screen To view the System Tree, select Window Split, then drag the mouse to the right to position the vertical splitter bar. Alternatively, you can place your
More information