Kick Off meeting teleconference

Transcription

1 AP242 Benchmark #2 1 Kick Off meeting teleconference CAD test cases - Workpackage n 1 16 th of February 2016 Report v1 benchmark.ap242.org

2 Attendees 2 n Jochen Boy n Chris Fellows n Jacques Heinisch n Guillaume Hirel n Kjell Bengtsson n Joe Lackner n Gauthier Wahu n William Gallego n Steve Bee n Toni Qin n Michaeil Mayr n Olivier Tabaste n Patrick Klintworth n Frédéric Chambolle n Frédéric Darré n Feldovss Bernd n Eric Ledeme n Christian Caillet n Mark Fischer n Mark Lobo n Wayne Catalfano n Pierre Duchier n Jose Coronado n Alexandre Loire n Jean-Yves Delaunay n Véronique Dubillot n Kevin Le Tutour

3 Agenda 3 n Short project introduction n Benchmark n 1 results n Benchmark n 2 planning of CAD workpackage and PDM workpackage. n Project Organization n CAD Test cases list presentation n CAD Test methodology n STEP Functionalities coverage by the Vendor solutions n Next

4 Project introduction 4

5 AFNeT & ProSTEP ivip associations are conducting the second STEP AP242 benchmark 5 n ISO STEP AP242 Ed1 is available n Objectives: Complete & neutral quality control of AP242 based implementations allow our communities to reach a status of maturity for these applications n Functionalities & systems to be benchmarked are given by the user communities n Test criteria formal correctness of the file fulfilment of end-to-end validation properties end-user validation n This project is composed of two work-packages : WP 1: CAD workpackage managed by AFNeT. WP 2: PDM workpackage managed commonly by ProSTEP ivip and AFNeT.

6 Roles of AFNeT & ProSTEP ivip 6 n AFNeT and ProSTEP ivip are hosting the STEP AP 242 Benchmark Activities and thereby guaranty the neutrality, comprehensiveness and quality of the benchmark performance and the results. n Both parties are collecting funding from the user community to contract all relevant services. The amount of this funding has directly influence on the amount of tests which are conducted within the benchmark. AFNeT: with member companies from manufacturing industry, IT, business and research, is the main actor in France for the promotion of IT standards and open systems since 30 years and has conducted Benchmark n 1. ProSTEP ivip: 180 international member companies from manufacturing industry, IT business and research, contributes with experiences of 8 STEP Benchmarks and 5 JT Benchmarks over the last 20 years. n AFNeT and ProSTEP ivip care for the dissemination of the Benchmark results.

7 AP242 Benchmark n 1 (1/2) 7

8 AP242 Benchmark n 1 (2/2) 8 n CAD & converters systems n Viewers n Scoped test cases

9 Planning Benchmark n Feb March May June Sept Oct 2017 Feb Kick Off WP1 CAD 16/02 Finalization and preview Preparation Benchmark WP1 CAD Software installation Tests Kick Off WP2 PDM Evaluation and validation Publication Report Publication Benchmark WP2 PDM Preparation and installation Tests, evaluation and validation PDM-IF 1st test round 2nd test round 3rd test round

10 Project organization CAD WP 10 Provide use cases AP242 Benchmark #2 Steering Committee - Steven Vettermann, ProSTEP ivip - Jean Brangé, AFNeT Provide fundings Define priorities Define business scenarios Provide roadmap Validate Benchmark results Report to CAD Core technical team Industrial partners of the project Provide datasets - Pierre Duchier, CIMPA - Kevin Le Tutour, Boost Conseil Testing team Design build, lead test Drive test review Select reference CAD test models Provide benchmarked products, licenses & settings CAD Vendors partners Produce result report Share project documents Run tests Infrastructures Publication website Internal collaboration website AFNeT Test & validation platform

11 List of CAD test cases 11 Id TC1 TC2 TC3a TC3b TC3c TC4 TC6a TC6b TC6c TC6d Title 3D exact geometry 3D tessellated geometry PMI graphic polyline (3D exact geometry) PMI graphic tessellated (3D exact geometry) PMI semantic link with graphic (3D exact geometry) PMI graphic tessellated (3D tess geometry) CAD assembly AIM P21 Monolithic (one file including assembly + exact geometry data) CAD assembly AIM P21 ext ref assembly STEP tessellated geometry compressed CAD assembly BOM XML ext ref assembly STEP tessellated geometry compressed CAD assembly AIM P21 Nested assembly STEP exact geometry Test case in grey = priority 2

12 CAD Test cases overview: geometry 12 n TC1: 3D exact geometry Type of geometry: o o o solids, Shells / independent surface, independent curves and points User defined attributes Color of the solids and surface, styling of the independent curves Geometric validation properties n TC2: 3D tessellated geometry Type of geometry: o o o solids, Shells / independent surface, independent curves and points Color of the solids and surface, styling of the independent curves Validation properties Example of the potential test model Candidate native format: CATIA V5 CREO NX Inventor Solidwork* Solidedge* 3Dexperience* * not yet available in this format for the model in the illustration

13 CAD Test cases overview: PMI 13 n TC3a PMI graphic polyline (3D exact geometry) & TC3b PMI graphic tessellated (3D exact geometry) & TC4 PMI graphic tessellated (3D tess geometry) PMI graphic presentation Saved views Cross highlight PMI Validation properties n TC3c PMI semantic link with graphic (3D exact geometry) PMI semantic representation Saved views Cross highlight PMI Validation properties Example of the potential test model Candidate native format: CATIA V5 CREO NX Solidwork Inventor* Solidedge* 3Dexperience* * not yet available in this format for the model in the illustration

14 CAD Test cases overview: Assembly 14 n TC6a CAD assembly AIM P21 Monolithic (one file including assembly + exact geometry data) n TC6b CAD assembly AIM P21 ext ref assembly STEP tessellated geometry compressed n TC6c CAD assembly BOM XML ext ref assembly STEP tessellated geometry compressed n TC6d CAD assembly AIM P21 Nested assembly STEP exact geometry n Assembly structure n Assembly Validation properties n External reference to geometry Example of the potential test model Candidate native format: CATIA V5 CREO NX Solidwork* Inventor* Solidedge* 3Dexperience* * not yet available in this format for the model in the illustration

15 CAD Test methodology 15 The CAD test strategy is the same as the benchmark #1: 1. the creation of STEP files from all the selected applications; 2. the selection per test case of one of the STEP file based on the syntax check and the loop tests (conversion from STEP to native with the same application used for the conversion from native to STEP); 3. the import of the selected files into all of the selected applications.

16 Vendor solutions covering the proposed Test Cases 16 Vendors Solution Name Supported interfaces Comments Autodesk Inventor Professionnal 2017 STEP export & import CAD system CoreTechnologie 3DEvolution CATIAV5, CATIAV6, NX, CREO, Inventor, SolidWorks STEP Converter 3DAnalyzer STEP Viewer Dassault Systèmes CATIAV5-6R2016 STEP export & import CAD system 3DEXPERIENCER2016x STEP export & import CAD system PTC Creo Parametric STEP export & import CAD system Siemens STEP/JT JT STEP Converter Theorem CADVerter NX STEP Converter TechSoft3D Tetra 4D Converter CATIAV5, CATIAV6, NX, CREO, Inventor, SolidWorks, SolidEdge, JT, 3D PDF, PARASOLID, ACIS. STEP Converter STEP Viewer Kisters 3DViewStation CATIAV5, CATIAV6, NX, CREO, Inventor, SolidWorks, SolidEdge, JT, 3D PDF, PARASOLID, ACIS. STEP Viewer Datakit CrossManager CATIA V5, CATIA V6, NX, Creo, AP242 Benchmark #2 -Inventor, CAD WP SolidWorks, KickOff SolidEdge, 3D PDF STEP Converter

17 Next 17 n CAD WP Test list scope will be decided by the Steering Committee during the next month n CAD WP Installation phase date: from March 15 th n CAD WP Test phase date: from May 15 th n KickOff PDM WP planned in June 2016 Will consider the result of the PDM-IF 1 st test round

18 Contacts WP1 CAD 18 n Software installation Kevin Le Tutour AFNeT 30 rue de Miromesnil Paris, France kevin.letutour@boost-conseil.com Tel.: +33 (0) Mobile: +33 (0) n Public Website: benchmark.ap242.org Download here Benchmak #1 report