Forward Time-of-Flight Geometry for CLAS12
|
|
- Corey Caitlin Lindsey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Forward Time-of-Flight Geometry for CLAS12 D.S. Carman, Jefferson Laboratory ftof geom.tex April 13, 2016 Abstract This document details the nominal geometry for the CLAS12 Forward Time-of- Flight System (FTOF). 1 FTOF Overview The Forward Time-of-Flight System (FTOF) is a major component of the CLAS12 forward detector used to measure the time-of-flight of charged particles emerging from interactions in the target. The average path length from the target to the FTOF counters is roughly 7 m. The requirements for the FTOF include excellent timing resolution for particle identification and good segmentation to minimize counting rates and to provide for flexible triggering options. The system specifications call for an average time resolution of σ T OF =80 ps at the more forward angles of CLAS12 and 150 ps at angles larger than 35. The system must also be capable of operating in a high-rate environment. The maximum counting rate occurs in the most forward direction where, at an operating luminosity of cm 2 s 1, the average rate per scintillator is approximately 250 khz. The CLAS12 detector is built around a six-coil toroidal magnet that divides the active detection area into six 60 -wide azimuthal regions called sectors. In each of the six sectors of CLAS12, the FTOF system is comprised of three arrays of counters, referred to as panels, named panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2. Each panel consists of a set of rectangular scintillators with a PMT on each end. Panel-1 refers to the counters located at forward angles (roughly 5 to 35 ) (where two panels are necessary to meet the 80 ps average time resolution requirement) and panel-2 refers to the sets of counters at larger angles (roughly 35 to 45 ). The positioning and attachment of the FTOF detector arrays to the Forward Carriage of CLAS12 are shown in Fig. 1. Each of the six panel-1a arrays contains 23 counters. The new highly segmented panel-1b arrays each contain 62 counters. Finally, each panel-2 array consists of 5 counters. The FTOF counter arrays in the angular range from 5 to 35 consist of two sets of six triangular arrays. Just upstream of the Preshower Calorimeter (PCAL) detectors, the panel-1a arrays are mounted. These detector sets were refurbished from the panel-1 TOF counters from the decommissioned CLAS spectrometer. Upstream of the panel-1a arrays the new panel-1b arrays are mounted. In the angular range from 35 to 45 the panel-2 arrays 1
2 Figure 1: View of the FTOF counters for CLAS12 highlighting the location of the panel-1 and panel-2 counters. The panel-1b counter arrays are shown in orange and the panel-2 counter arrays, mounted around the perimeter of the Forward Carriage, are shown in red. The panel-1a counter arrays mounted just downstream of the panel-1b arrays are not visible in this picture. The Forward Carriage is roughly 10 m in diameter. are mounted. These detectors were refurbished from the panel-2 arrays of the CLAS TOF system. A summary of the FTOF technical parameters is given in Table 1. 2 Nominal FTOF Geometry 2.1 Model Geometry The geometry for each FTOF array is specified by a limited set of parameters. Figure 2 shows a view of the scintillator arrays in a single representative sector. This view is in the sector mid-plane and the key parameters used to specify the geometry are indicated. These parameters include: R a - distance from the nominal CLAS12 center to the small angle upstream edge of panel-1a counter #1. R b - distance from the nominal CLAS12 center to the small angle upstream edge of panel-1b counter #1. th a min - polar angle of the ray marking R a. th b min - polar angle of the ray marking R b. th 1 tilt - tilt angle of the panel-1a and panel-1b arrays relative to a line perpendicular to the z-axis (or electron beamline). thick 1a - thickness of the panel-1a scintillators. 2
3 Parameter Design Value Panel-1a Angular Coverage θ = 5 35, φ : 50% at 5 85% at 35 Counter Dimensions L = 32.3 cm cm, w h = 15 cm 5 cm Scintillator Material BC-408 PMTs EMI 9954A, Philips XP2262 Design Resolution 90 ps 160 ps Panel-1b Angular Coverage θ = 5 35, φ : 50% at 5 85% at 35 Counter Dimensions L = 17.3 cm cm, w h = 6 cm 6 cm Scintillator Material BC-404 (#1 #31), BC-408 (#32 #62) PMTs Hamamatsu R9779 Design Resolution 60 ps 110 ps Panel-2 Angular Coverage θ = 35 45, φ : 85% at 35 95% at 45 Counter Dimensions L = cm cm, w h = 22 cm 5 cm Scintillator Material BC-408 PMTs Photonis XP4312B, EMI 4312KB Design Resolution 145 ps 160 ps Table 1: Table of parameters for the scintillators, PMTs, and counters for the FTOF panel- 1a, panel-1b, and panel-2 arrays. w 1a - width of the panel-1a scintillators. thick 1b - thickness of the panel-1b scintillators. w 1b - width of the panel-1b scintillators. gap 1a 1b - separation between panel-1a and panel-1b. R 2 - distance from the nominal CLAS12 center to the small angle upstream edge of panel-2 counter #1. th 2 min - polar angle of the ray marking R 2. th 2 tilt - tilt angle of the panel-2 arrays relative to a line perpendicular to the z-axis. thick 2 - thickness of the panel-2 scintillators. w 2 - width of the panel-2 scintillators. gap 1a - gap between neighboring panel-1a counters (not shown). gap 1b - gap between neighboring panel-1b counters (not shown). gap 2 - gap between neighboring panel-2 counters (not shown). 3
4 The nominal values of the FTOF geometry parameters for each sector are listed in Table 2. Note that there are two values listed for gap 1b. The smaller value is the gap between scintillation bars mounted to a single backing structure and the larger value is the gap between scintillation bars on neighboring backing structures. Tables 10, 11, and 12 in the Appendix (Section 4) contain a listing of the coordinates of the center point on the upstream face of each scintillator in panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2 in Sector 1 (see Fig. 3 for the CLAS12 sector naming convention) calculated using these values. The coordinates are listed in the Hall B coordinate system with the z-axis along the electron beamline pointing downstream, the x-axis pointing toward beam left, and the y-axis pointing upward, thus defining a righthanded coordinate system. The origin is located at the center of the nominal CLAS12 target position. Figure 2: View of the FTOF scintillators for panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2 in the sector mid-plane with the key parameters indicated. There are five main users of the FTOF geometry information: 1. The designers working with the CAD program laying out the detectors on their support frames and their positions on the Forward Carriage; 2. The developers working on the event display program; 4
5 Parameter R a R b th a min th b min th 1 tilt thick 1a w 1a thick 1b w 1b gap 1a 1b R 2 th 2 min th 2 tilt thick 2 w 2 gap 1a gap 1b gap 2 Nominal Value cm cm cm cm 6.0 cm 6.0 cm cm cm cm 22.0 cm cm 0.04 cm, cm cm Table 2: Table of the nominal geometry parameters for the CLAS12 FTOF detector system. S2 S3 S1 S4 S6 S5 Figure 3: View of the upstream face of the Forward Carriage in Hall B showing the CLAS12 sector naming conversion for Sector 1 (S1) through Sector 6 (S6). The dashed lines denote the mid-planes for each sector. 5
6 3. The developers of the Monte Carlo program; 4. Those working on the event reconstruction and calibration software; 5. The survey and alignment team. It is essential that the underlying geometry be the same for all interested parties and that it be derived from a common source, namely the information contained in this document Scintillator Lengths The nominal scintillator layout and naming convention for panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2 are shown in Figs. 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The lengths of the individual bars are given in Tables 3, 4, and 5. In all cases, scintillator #1 in a given array is the one located closest to the beamline. Figure 4: View of the face of a generic FTOF panel-1a array showing the numbering scheme for the 23 scintillators that make up the counters in each of the six sectors of CLAS12. 6
7 Counter Length (cm) Counter Length (cm) Counter Length (cm) Table 3: FTOF panel-1a counter lengths (cm) for each scintillator. Each panel-1a scintillator is 15.0 cm wide. Figure 5: View of the face of a generic FTOF panel-1b array showing the numbering scheme for the 62 scintillators that make up the counters in each of the six sectors of CLAS12. 7
8 Counter Length (cm) Counter Length (cm) Counter Length (cm) Counter Length (cm) Table 4: FTOF panel-1b counter lengths (cm) for each scintillator. Each panel-1b scintillator is 6.0 cm wide. Figure 6: View of the face of a generic FTOF panel-2 array showing the numbering scheme for the 5 scintillators that make up the counters in each of the six sectors of CLAS12. Counter Length (cm) Table 5: FTOF panel-2 counter lengths (cm) for each scintillator. Each panel-2 scintillator is 22.0 cm wide. 8
9 Fig. 7 shows a plot of the FTOF panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2 counter lengths vs. counter number, demonstrating the linearity of the counter lengths in each array. Note that the only deviation from linearity vs. counter number occurs for panel-1a after counter #5. This behavior will have to be captured by the CLAS12 geometry service description. Fits to these data yield the counter length for a given counter number N counter as follows: Panel-1a: L(cm) = N counter (N counter = #1 #5), Panel-1a: L(cm) = N counter (N counter = #6 #23), Panel-1b: L(cm) = 6.40 N counter , Panel-2: L(cm) = N counter panel-2 panel-1a panel-1b Counter Length Counter Number Figure 7: Plot of the scintillator lengths (cm) vs. counter number for each of the FTOF arrays. 2.2 Nominal Geometry The positioning of the individual FTOF scintillators shown in Fig. 2 is based on the design model. The true positioning of the counters must account for the material layers that are wrapped around the bare scintillator material, as well as the nominal gaps between the bars as they are placed on their mounting frames. To determine the nominal scintillator positioning on the frames, we use the known thicknesses of the wrapping materials and the average counter-to-counter gaps determined from the assembled arrays. To determine the nominal geometry and positioning of the FTOF scintillators on the counter frames, the overall radial extent of each counter array must be known (i.e. the length along the sector mid-plane from the inside edge of counter #1 to the outside edge of the last counter). These details from direct measurements of the counters on their associated frames are shown in Table 6. The last two rows of Table 6 show the average overall radial width of each panel and the standard deviation σ of the sector-to-sector variations for each of the different FTOF arrays. 9
10 Array Radial Width (cm) Sector Panel-1a Panel-1b Panel Avg σ Table 6: FTOF overall sector radial width (cm) for panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2. From the information included in Table 6 on the overall radial extents of each counter array, along with knowledge of the wrapping materials and how the counters are stacked on the frames, the nominal gap between each of the counters on the frames can be computed and compared to a sampling of the measured values. The average gap between counters can be determined by the following formula for panel-1a and panel-2: W 1a,2 = (N c W c ) + (2 t material N c ) + (N c 1) gap. (1) For panel-1b the appropriate formula is given by: W 1b = (N c W c ) + (2 t material N c ) + (N c /2 1) gap. (2) In these expressions, the overall sector radial extents (W 1a,1b,2 ) come from the average values given in Table 6, N c is the number of counters in each sector (panel-1a = 23, panel-1b = 62, panel-2 = 5), W c is the nominal width of the bare scintillators in each array (panel-1a = 15.0 cm, panel-1b = 6.0 cm, panel-2 = 22.0 cm), t material is the material thickness on each side of the counters, and gap is the nominal counter-to-counter gap on each frame. Note that for panel-1b, the pairs of counters on a single backing structure have no gap between the scintillators except for the wrapping materials. The separation between counters on neighboring backing structures is given by the value of gap. To determine the nominal average value of gap for each FTOF panel, we need to know the details of the wrapping materials employed in the detector construction. For panel-1a and panel-2 the wrapping materials include: 1 layer of in ( cm) thick Kapton, 2 layers of in ( cm) thick aluminum foil, t material = cm (total thickness per side). For panel-1b, the wrapping materials include: 3 layers of in ( cm) thick Tedlar, 10
11 1 layer of in ( cm) thick aluminized Polyester film, t material = cm (total thickness per side). Using Eqs. (1) and (2) this gives the following nominal average counter-to-counter gap values: Panel-1a: gap = cm, Panel-1b: gap = cm (gap between counter pairs as noted above), Panel-2 : gap = cm. The computed gaps can be compared against a sampling of the measured counter-tocounter gaps. For panel-1a, the typical measured gaps fell into the range from cm to cm. For panel-1b, the typical measured gaps were in the range from cm to cm. For panel-2, the typical measured gaps fell into the range from cm to cm. The measured gaps are reasonably consistent with the average values computed for these gaps. 2.3 FTOF Relative Geometry To accommodate the size of the photomultiplier tubes on the side of the Preshower Calorimeter (PCAL) modules, a translational shift of all of the PCAL modules on the Forward Carriage was required. These shifts, which amounted to cm, are indicated in Fig. 8. Thus each PCAL module was shifted along the directions indicated in Fig. 8 by this distance. However, each of the FTOF arrays is mounted such that they are (roughly) symmetric about the sector mid-plane. Fig. 9 shows for a single representative sector the FTOF panel-1a array in relation to the active areas of the Region 2 drift chamber and the LTCC, projected downstream to the position of panel-1a. Also shown are the active areas of the PCAL and EC projected upstream to the panel-1a position. Fig. 10 shows the same projections but at the location of the FTOF panel-1b array. 3 Survey Plans The survey plans and requirements to locate the panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2 FTOF arrays after installation on the Forward Carriage in Hall B are detailed in the document: CLAS12 Forward Time-of-Flight Survey Requirements, carman/ftof/notes/ftof survey.pdf. The general approach to the FTOF survey was based on surveying the individual FTOF arrays after they were installed with respect to optical survey monuments positioned on the Forward Carriage. When the Forward Carriage is moved from its downstream installation position into its nominal upstream running position, the monument points will be surveyed again. These two sets of survey information will then provide the locations of the FTOF arrays at their nominal locations. 11
12 S S S S S S Figure 8: View of the face of the Forward Carriage indicating the translational shift directions of the PCAL modules relative to the sector mid-planes. Panel 1a Projections DC Region 2 LTCC EC PCAL Figure 9: View of the active area outlines of the Forward Carriage detectors in a single sector projected to the location of FTOF panel-1a. 12
13 Panel 1b Projections DC Region 2 LTCC EC PCAL Figure 10: View of the active area outlines of the Forward Carriage detectors in a single sector projected to the location of FTOF panel-1b. The survey information will then be analyzed to determine the X, Y, and Z translational shifts of each array in their local sector-based coordinate system, as well as the associated pitch, roll, and yaw angles about these different coordinate axes. These translational and rotational offsets compared to the ideal model geometry will need to be included in the FTOF geometry service. For the nominal geometry, all FTOF arrays are assumed to be positioned symmetry about the sector mid-plane. Note that the survey information does not locate each of the counters in the different arrays. The survey data is most useful to define the as installed plane of each of the counter arrays. The locations of the individual counters within each array will be determined using the nominal geometry information from Section FTOF Materials The FTOF system includes material layers and supports that lie within the active area of the detector. These materials will need to be properly included within the Monte Carlo detector description. The material layers include the reflective and light-tight layers that are used to wrap the individual scintillator bars and the supports include the composite backing structures that support the bars from flexing and are used to attach them to the sector frames that lie in the detector shadow region. Note that the tape used to attach the scintillator bars to the backing structures are not included in this specification. The specification of the FTOF material layers and supports for panel-1a, panel-1b, and panel-2 are included in Tables 7, 8, and 9, respectively. 13
14 Material Layer Thickness Comment Scintillator Layers Al foil t=0.001 in 2 layers per side Kapton t= in 1 layer per side Pb sheet t=0.005 in upstream face only Backing Structure St.St. skin (304SS) t= in 1 layer on either side of foam Polyurethane foam (FR-3705) t=1.00 in ρ=5 lb/ft 3 Table 7: FTOF layers and support specifications for panel-1a. The 5.0-cm thick scintillator bars of panel-1a are assumed. Material Layer Thickness Comment Scintillator Layers Aluminized Polyester film t= in 1 layer per side Kapton t= in 3 layers per side Backing Structure St.St. skin (304SS) t=0.029 in 1 layer on either side of foam Polyurethane foam (FR-3705) t=1.971 in ρ=5 lb/ft 3 Table 8: FTOF layers and support specifications for panel-1b. The 6.0-cm thick scintillator bars of panel-1b are assumed. Material Layer Thickness Comment Scintillator Layers Al foil t=0.001 in 2 layers per side Kapton t= in 1 layer per side Pb sheet t=0.005 in upstream face only Backing Structure St.St. skin (304SS) t= in 1 layer on either side of foam Polyurethane foam (FR-3705) t=3.00 in ρ=5 lb/ft 3 Table 9: FTOF layers and support specifications for panel-2. The 5.0-cm thick scintillator bars of panel-2 are assumed. 14
15 Appendix Using the values in Table 2 the x and z coordinates at the center of the upstream face of each bar can be computed for counter N using: Panel-1a & Panel-2 Panel-1b x = R sin(th min) + [(N 1)(t + gap) + 0.5t] cos(th tilt) (3) z = R cos(th min) [(N 1)(t + gap) + 0.5t] sin(th tilt) (4) N pair = (mod(n, 2) + N)/2, N member = mod(n + 1, 2) (5) x = R sin(th min) + [(2t + gap 1 + gap 2 )(N pair 1) + (t + gap 1 )N member + 0.5t] cos(th tilt) (6) z = R cos(th min) [(2t + gap 1 + gap 2 )(N pair 1) + (t + gap 1 )N member + 0.5t] sin(th tilt) (7) Counter x (cm) y (cm) z (cm) R (cm) Table 10: Table of the nominal coordinates in the Hall B coordinate system locating the center point on the upstream face of the scintillators for each FTOF counter in panel-1a for Sector 1. 15
16 Counter x (cm) y (cm) z (cm) R (cm) Counter x (cm) y (cm) z (cm) R (cm) Table 11: Table of the nominal coordinates in the Hall B coordinate system locating the center point on the upstream face of the scintillators for each FTOF counter in panel-1b for Sector 1. Counter x (cm) y (cm) z (cm) R (cm) Table 12: Table of the nominal coordinates in the Hall B coordinate system locating the center point on the upstream face of the scintillators for each FTOF counter in panel-2 for Sector 1. 16
Forward Time-of-Flight Detector Efficiency for CLAS12
Forward Time-of-Flight Detector Efficiency for CLAS12 D.S. Carman, Jefferson Laboratory ftof eff.tex May 29, 2014 Abstract This document details an absolute hit efficiency study of the FTOF panel-1a and
More informationTORUS Field Mapping. Joseph Newton Old Dominion University CLAS Collaboration Meeting March 2017
TORUS Field Mapping Joseph Newton Old Dominion University CLAS Collaboration Meeting March 2017 Objectives and Physics Specifications TORUS consists of six superconducting coils which produces a symmetric,
More informationPerformance of the GlueX Detector Systems
Performance of the GlueX Detector Systems GlueX-doc-2775 Gluex Collaboration August 215 Abstract This document summarizes the status of calibration and performance of the GlueX detector as of summer 215.
More informationPrimEx Trigger Simultation Study D. Lawrence Mar. 2002
PRIMEX NOTE 6 PrimEx Trigger Simultation Study D. Lawrence Mar. 2002 Introduction This documents describes a Monte Carlo simulation study for the PrimEx o experiment. The study focused on determining trigger
More informationUpgraded Swimmer for Computationally Efficient Particle Tracking for Jefferson Lab s CLAS12 Spectrometer
Upgraded Swimmer for Computationally Efficient Particle Tracking for Jefferson Lab s CLAS12 Spectrometer Lydia Lorenti Advisor: David Heddle April 29, 2018 Abstract The CLAS12 spectrometer at Jefferson
More informationA New Segment Building Algorithm for the Cathode Strip Chambers in the CMS Experiment
EPJ Web of Conferences 108, 02023 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/ epjconf/ 201610802023 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 A New Segment Building Algorithm for the Cathode Strip Chambers in the
More informationThree-Dimensional Laser Scanner. Field Evaluation Specifications
Stanford University June 27, 2004 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center P.O. Box 20450 Stanford, California 94309, USA Three-Dimensional Laser Scanner Field Evaluation Specifications Metrology Department
More informationImproved Detector Response Characterization Method in ISOCS and LabSOCS
P Improved Detector Response Characterization Method in ISOCS and LabSOCS *1 1 1 1 1 R. VenkataramanP P, F. BronsonP P, V. AtrashkevichP P, M. FieldP P, and B.M. YoungP P. 1 PCanberra Industries, 800 Research
More informationWork in Tbilisi. David Mchedlishvili (SMART EDM_lab of TSU) GGSWBS , Tbilisi. Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft David Mchedlishvili (SMART EDM_lab of TSU) Work in Tbilisi GGSWBS 18 23.08.2018, Tbilisi JEDI: Charged-Particle EDM Search Main principle: Inject polarized particles
More informationDeeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Jefferson Lab
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Jefferson Lab June 16-17, 2016 Frederic Georges (PhD student) PhD Supervisor: Carlos Muñoz Camacho Institut de Physique Nucléaire d Orsay CNRS-IN2P3 Université Paris-Sud,
More informationSimulating the RF Shield for the VELO Upgrade
LHCb-PUB-- March 7, Simulating the RF Shield for the VELO Upgrade T. Head, T. Ketel, D. Vieira. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil European Organization for Nuclear Research
More informationLight and the Properties of Reflection & Refraction
Light and the Properties of Reflection & Refraction OBJECTIVE To study the imaging properties of a plane mirror. To prove the law of reflection from the previous imaging study. To study the refraction
More informationLCLS Undulator Quadrupole Fiducialization Plan
LCLS-TN-07-7 LCLS Undulator Quadrupole Fiducialization Plan Zachary Wolf, Michael Levashov, Eric Lundahl, Ed Reese, Catherine LeCocq, Robert Ruland Stanford Linear Accelerator Center August 14, 2007 Abstract
More informationInsertion Device Alignment for the Diamond Light Source
Insertion Device Alignment for the Diamond Light Source A. Mariani Diamond Light Source, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon. OX11 0DE, UK This paper covers the survey and alignment techniques selected for the build
More informationA Scintillating Fiber Tracker for Cosmic Muon Tomography
A Scintillating Fiber Tracker for Cosmic Muon Tomography Carsten Mai I. Physikalisches Institut B der RWTH Aachen GK Seminar Bad Honnef, September 2011 Outline A Particle Physicist's Approach to Archeological
More informationIdentification of Shielding Material Configurations Using NMIS Imaging
Identification of Shielding Material Configurations Using NMIS Imaging B. R. Grogan, J. T. Mihalczo, S. M. McConchie, and J. A. Mullens Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, MS-6010, Oak Ridge,
More informationIntroduction to 3D Machine Vision
Introduction to 3D Machine Vision 1 Many methods for 3D machine vision Use Triangulation (Geometry) to Determine the Depth of an Object By Different Methods: Single Line Laser Scan Stereo Triangulation
More informationRAY TRACING TIIROUGH MAGNET SYSTEMS. E. A. Taylor. The Spectrometer Facilities Group (SFG) has written a simple Ray Tracing
RAY TRACING TIIROUGH MAGNET SYSTEMS SLAC-TN-71-26 December 1971 INTRODUCTION E. A. Taylor The Spectrometer Facilities Group (SFG) has written a simple Ray Tracing program which is intended as a supplement
More informationExperiment 8 Wave Optics
Physics 263 Experiment 8 Wave Optics In this laboratory, we will perform two experiments on wave optics. 1 Double Slit Interference In two-slit interference, light falls on an opaque screen with two closely
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 13 Jan 2015
The Assembly of the Belle II TOP Counter Boqun Wang, On behalf of the Belle II PID Group Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA University of Cincinnati preprint UCHEP-14-01
More informationTORCH: A large-area detector for precision time-of-flight measurements at LHCb
TORCH: A large-area detector for precision time-of-flight measurements at LHCb Neville Harnew University of Oxford ON BEHALF OF THE LHCb RICH/TORCH COLLABORATION Outline The LHCb upgrade TORCH concept
More informationEngineered Diffusers Intensity vs Irradiance
Engineered Diffusers Intensity vs Irradiance Engineered Diffusers are specified by their divergence angle and intensity profile. The divergence angle usually is given as the width of the intensity distribution
More information11.0 Measurement of Spindle Error Motion
11.0 Measurement of Spindle Error Motion 11.1 Introduction The major spindle error motion is caused by the alignment of the spindle rotational axis, the centerline of the tool holder and the centerline
More informationTime and position resolution of high granularity, high counting rate MRPC for the inner zone of the CBM-TOF wall
Time and position resolution of high granularity, high counting rate MRPC for the inner zone of the CBM-TOF wall M. Petris, D. Bartos, G. Caragheorgheopol, M. Petrovici, L. Radulescu, V. Simion IFIN-HH
More informationStatus of the TORCH time-of-flight detector
Status of the TORCH time-of-flight detector Neville Harnew University of Oxford (On behalf of the TORCH collaboration : the Universities of Bath, Bristol and Oxford, CERN, and Photek) August 7-9, 2017
More informationThe goal of this lab is to give you a chance to align and use a Pockel s Cell.
880 Quantum Electronics Lab Pockel s Cell Alignment And Use The goal of this lab is to give you a chance to align and use a Pockel s Cell. You may not take this lab unless you have read the laser safety
More informationThe LHCb upgrade. Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade main drivers Overview of the sub-detector modifications Conclusions
The LHCb upgrade Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade main drivers Overview of the sub-detector modifications Conclusions OT IT coverage 1.9
More informationIntroduction to Biomedical Imaging
Alejandro Frangi, PhD Computational Imaging Lab Department of Information & Communication Technology Pompeu Fabra University www.cilab.upf.edu X-ray Projection Imaging Computed Tomography Digital X-ray
More informationDetermination of the aperture of the LHCb VELO RF foil
LHCb-PUB-214-12 April 1, 214 Determination of the aperture of the LHCb VELO RF foil M. Ferro-Luzzi 1, T. Latham 2, C. Wallace 2. 1 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 2 University of Warwick, United Kingdom LHCb-PUB-214-12
More informationUpdate of the BESIII Event Display System
Update of the BESIII Event Display System Shuhui Huang, Zhengyun You Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China E-mail: huangshh28@mail2.sysu.edu.cn, youzhy5@mail.sysu.edu.cn Abstract. The BESIII
More informationLocating the neutrino interaction vertex with the help of electronic detectors in the OPERA experiment
Locating the neutrino interaction vertex with the help of electronic detectors in the OPERA experiment S.Dmitrievsky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia LNGS seminar, 2015/04/08 Outline
More informationCalypso Construction Features. Construction Features 1
Calypso 1 The Construction dropdown menu contains several useful construction features that can be used to compare two other features or perform special calculations. Construction features will show up
More informationISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE
ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE Sezione di Genova INFN/TC-07/9 July 9, 2007 STUDY OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MIRRORS OF THE DIRECTIONAL OPTICAL MODULE FOR THE NEMO NEUTRINO UNDERWATER TELESCOPE
More informationFull Offline Reconstruction in Real Time with the LHCb Detector
Full Offline Reconstruction in Real Time with the LHCb Detector Agnieszka Dziurda 1,a on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 1 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract. This document describes the novel, unique
More informationSoLID GEM Detectors in US
SoLID GEM Detectors in US Kondo Gnanvo University of Virginia SoLID Collaboration Meeting @ JLab, 08/26/2016 Outline Design Optimization U-V strips readout design Large GEMs for PRad in Hall B Requirements
More informationG4beamline Simulations for H8
G4beamline Simulations for H8 Author: Freja Thoresen EN-MEF-LE, Univ. of Copenhagen & CERN Supervisor: Nikolaos Charitonidis CERN (Dated: December 15, 2015) Electronic address: frejathoresen@gmail.com
More informationATLAS Muon Endcap Alignment
Muon Endcap Alignment Jim Bensinger Brandeis University/BMC Siena_04 May 24, 2004 Basic Concept of Endcap Muon Alignment To determine the location of the muon endcap chambers, a grid is setup with alignment
More informationMeasurement of fragmentation cross-section of 400 MeV/u 12 C beam on thin targets
Measurement of fragmentation cross-section of 400 MeV/u 12 C beam on thin targets Candidate: Abdul Haneefa Kummali Supervisor : Dr. Vincenzo Monaco PhD School - Department of Physics XXVII cycle 14-February-2014
More information[Type text] [Type text] [Type text] GearPro Procedure
GearPro Procedure Pictured below is the GearPro main screen. In this manual the icons on the top right corner (Chapter 1), far left side (Chapters 2-5), and far right side (Chapters 6&7) will be discussed.
More informationPoS(Baldin ISHEPP XXII)134
Implementation of the cellular automaton method for track reconstruction in the inner tracking system of MPD at NICA, G.A. Ososkov and A.I. Zinchenko Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna,
More informationD&S Technical Note 09-2 D&S A Proposed Correction to Reflectance Measurements of Profiled Surfaces. Introduction
Devices & Services Company 10290 Monroe Drive, Suite 202 - Dallas, Texas 75229 USA - Tel. 214-902-8337 - Fax 214-902-8303 Web: www.devicesandservices.com Email: sales@devicesandservices.com D&S Technical
More information8.882 LHC Physics. Track Reconstruction and Fitting. [Lecture 8, March 2, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements
8.882 LHC Physics Experimental Methods and Measurements Track Reconstruction and Fitting [Lecture 8, March 2, 2009] Organizational Issues Due days for the documented analyses project 1 is due March 12
More informationCLAS12 Offline Software Tools. G.Gavalian (Jlab) CLAS Collaboration Meeting (June 15, 2016)
CLAS12 Offline Software Tools G.Gavalian (Jlab) Overview Data Formats: RAW data decoding from EVIO. Reconstruction output banks in EVIO. Reconstruction output convertor to ROOT (coming soon). Data preservation
More informationCharacterizing x-ray mirrors in reciprocal space
Characterizing x-ray mirrors in reciprocal space Preliminary results from the NIST X-ray Optics Evaluation Double-Crystal Diffractometer D.L. Gil, D. Windover, J.P. Cline, A. Henins National Institute
More informationDiffraction and Interference
Experiment #32 Diffraction and Interference Goals: Perform a quantitative investigation of two-slit interference Explore use of a photodiode to measure light intensity References 1. I. G. Main, Vibrations
More informationPreparation for the test-beam and status of the ToF detector construction
Preparation for the test-beam and status of the ToF detector construction C.Betancourt, A.Korzenev*, P.Mermod HPTPC-ToF meeting May 3, 2018 1 ToF and trigger Channels of the ToF DAQ system are self-triggered
More informationTwo slit interference - Prelab questions
Two slit interference - Prelab questions 1. Show that the intensity distribution given in equation 3 leads to bright and dark fringes at y = mλd/a and y = (m + 1/2) λd/a respectively, where m is an integer.
More informationCLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status and Timeline. Sergey Boyarinov Oct 3, 2017
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status and Timeline Sergey Boyarinov Oct 3, 2017 Notation ECAL old EC (electromagnetic calorimeter) PCAL preshower calorimeter DC drift chamber HTCC high threshold cherenkov counter
More informationAdding timing to the VELO
Summer student project report: Adding timing to the VELO supervisor: Mark Williams Biljana Mitreska Cern Summer Student Internship from June 12 to August 4, 2017 Acknowledgements I would like to thank
More informationUpdate of the BESIII Event Display System
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Update of the BESIII Event Display System To cite this article: Shuhui Huang and Zhengyun You 2018 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1085 042027 View the article
More informationResults on Long Term Performances and Laboratory Tests on the L3 RPC system at LEP. Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli
Results on Long Term Performances and Laboratory Tests on the L3 RPC system at LEP Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli Int. Workshop on Aging Phenomena in Gaseous Detectors October 2-5, 2001 Desy, Hamburg Outline
More informationLaboratory 6: Light and the Laser
Laboratory 6: Light and the Laser WARNING NEVER LOOK DIRECTLY AT LASER LIGHT Index of Refraction: Snell's Law 1. Read the section on physical optics in some introductory physics text. 2. Set the semicircular
More informationVerification of the Hexagonal Ray Tracing Module and the CMFD Acceleration in ntracer
KNS 2017 Autumn Gyeongju Verification of the Hexagonal Ray Tracing Module and the CMFD Acceleration in ntracer October 27, 2017 Seongchan Kim, Changhyun Lim, Young Suk Ban and Han Gyu Joo * Reactor Physics
More informationAn Example Eddy Currents
An Example Eddy Currents Introduction To help you understand how to create models using the AC/DC Module, this section walks through an example in great detail. You can apply these techniques to all the
More informationRay Optics I. Last time, finished EM theory Looked at complex boundary problems TIR: Snell s law complex Metal mirrors: index complex
Phys 531 Lecture 8 20 September 2005 Ray Optics I Last time, finished EM theory Looked at complex boundary problems TIR: Snell s law complex Metal mirrors: index complex Today shift gears, start applying
More informationπ ± Charge Exchange Cross Section on Liquid Argon
π ± Charge Exchange Cross Section on Liquid Argon Kevin Nelson REU Program, College of William and Mary Mike Kordosky College of William and Mary, Physics Dept. August 5, 2016 Abstract The observation
More informationMeasurement of period difference in grating pair based on analysis of grating phase shift
Measurement of period difference in grating pair based on analysis of grating phase shift Chao Guo, Lijiang Zeng State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments Department of Precision
More informationLevel-1 Data Driver Card of the ATLAS New Small Wheel Upgrade Compatible with the Phase II 1 MHz Readout
Level-1 Data Driver Card of the ATLAS New Small Wheel Upgrade Compatible with the Phase II 1 MHz Readout Panagiotis Gkountoumis National Technical University of Athens Brookhaven National Laboratory On
More informationMuon Reconstruction and Identification in CMS
Muon Reconstruction and Identification in CMS Marcin Konecki Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland E-mail: marcin.konecki@gmail.com An event reconstruction at LHC is a challenging
More informationFiducialization Report SRC EPU Advanced Design Consulting
Overview Fiducialiation Report SRC EPU The following is a description of the Fiducialiation process performed at ADC on the SRC EPU. Fiducialiation A Kern E2 theodolite (Figure 1) with a model 190 optical
More informationPolarization of light
Polarization of light TWO WEIGHTS RECOMENDED READINGS 1) G. King: Vibrations and Waves, Ch.5, pp. 109-11. Wiley, 009. ) E. Hecht: Optics, Ch.4 and Ch.8. Addison Wesley, 00. 3) PASCO Instruction Manual
More informationPHYS 1112L - Introductory Physics Laboratory II
PHYS 1112L - Introductory Physics Laboratory II Laboratory Advanced Sheet Diffraction 1. Objectives. The objectives of this laboratory are a. To be able use a diffraction grating to measure the wavelength
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION doi:10.1038/nature10934 Supplementary Methods Mathematical implementation of the EST method. The EST method begins with padding each projection with zeros (that is, embedding
More informationSTRAIGHT LINE REFERENCE SYSTEM STATUS REPORT ON POISSON SYSTEM CALIBRATION
STRAIGHT LINE REFERENCE SYSTEM STATUS REPORT ON POISSON SYSTEM CALIBRATION C. Schwalm, DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract For the Alignment of the European XFEL, a Straight Line Reference System will be used
More informationHow to Measure Wedge. Purpose. Introduction. Tools Needed
Purpose Optical Wedge Application (OWA) is an add-on analysis tool for measurement of optical wedges in either transmission or reflection. OWA can measure a single part or many parts simultaneously (e.g.
More informationPerformance of the ATLAS Inner Detector at the LHC
Performance of the ALAS Inner Detector at the LHC hijs Cornelissen for the ALAS Collaboration Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 2, 4297 Wuppertal, Germany E-mail: thijs.cornelissen@cern.ch Abstract.
More informationAN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TREATING THREE-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRICAL EFFECTS OF PARABOLIC TROUGH COLLECTORS
AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TREATING THREE-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRICAL EFFECTS OF PARABOLIC TROUGH COLLECTORS Marco Binotti Visiting PhD student from Politecnico di Milano National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden,
More informationThe ATLAS Conditions Database Model for the Muon Spectrometer
The ATLAS Conditions Database Model for the Muon Spectrometer Monica Verducci 1 INFN Sezione di Roma P.le Aldo Moro 5,00185 Rome, Italy E-mail: monica.verducci@cern.ch on behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration
More informationMuon Walls Setup in the Tilecal. Module 0 Beam Test. (August { September 1996) C. Bromberg, J. Huston, R. Miller, R. Richards, D. Schooltz. E.
TILECAL-NO-xxx 16 December 1996 DRAFT Muon Walls Setup in the Tilecal Module 0 Beam Test (August { September 1996) C. Bromberg, J. Huston, R. Miller, R. Richards, D. Schooltz Michigan State University
More informationSynrad3D Photon propagation and scattering simulation
Synrad3D Photon propagation and scattering simulation G. Dugan, D. Sagan CLASSE, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA Abstract As part of the Bmad software library, a program called Synrad3D has been
More informationDigital Laminography and Computed Tomography with 600 kv for Aerospace Applications
4th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace 2012 - Tu.3.A.1 Digital Laminography and Computed Tomography with 600 kv for Aerospace Applications Malte KURFISS 1, Gerd STRECKENBACH 2 1 YXLON International
More informationHigh Precision Lens Mounting
High Precision Lens Mounting APOMA Tucson Tech Workshop, 10-11 November, 2016 Presentation by Frédéric Lamontagne Institut national d optique (INO) Québec City, Canada 2016 Outline 1. Review of common
More informationStatus report. Eryk Kielar, Krzystof Oliwa, Wojciech Wierba, INP PAN, Cracow, Poland Wojciech Slominski, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
Laser alignment system Status report Leszek Zawiejski Eryk Kielar, Krzystof Oliwa, Wojciech Wierba, INP PAN, Cracow, Poland Wojciech Slominski, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland FCAL Workshop, October
More informationarxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.ins-det] 18 Dec 1998
Studies of 1 µm-thick silicon strip detector with analog VLSI readout arxiv:physics/981234v1 [physics.ins-det] 18 Dec 1998 T. Hotta a,1, M. Fujiwara a, T. Kinashi b, Y. Kuno c, M. Kuss a,2, T. Matsumura
More informationEUDET Telescope Geometry and Resolution Studies
EUDET EUDET Telescope Geometry and Resolution Studies A.F.Żarnecki, P.Nieżurawski February 2, 2007 Abstract Construction of EUDET pixel telescope will significantly improve the test beam infrastructure
More informationDocument Number: SC2/FTS/OPT/002
SCUBA-2 FTS Project Office University of Lethbridge Physics Department 4401 University Drive Lethbridge, Alberta CANADA T1K 3M4 Tel: 1-403-329-2771 Fax: 1-403-329-2057 Email: brad.gom@uleth.ca WWW: http://research.uleth.ca/scuba2/
More informationVELO Module Production - Final Module Metrology
LHCb-2007-087 11 January 2008 VELO Module Production - Final Module Metrology LHCB Technical Note Issue: Draft Revision: 1 Reference: LHCb 2007-087 Created: 10 th October 2006 Last modified: 11 th January
More information12 Alignment. Technical Synopsis
12 Alignment Technical Synopsis This section describes the procedures and methods used to position the LCLS-II components with their required accuracy. Most of the alignment requirements for the injector,
More informationFaculty of Engineering. Irrigation & Hydraulics Department Excel Tutorial (1)
Problem Statement: Excel Tutorial (1) Create an Excel spread sheet that can calculate the flow area A, wetted perimeter P, hydraulic radius R, top water surface width B, and hydraulic depth D for the following
More informationSpherical Geometry Selection Used for Error Evaluation
Spherical Geometry Selection Used for Error Evaluation Greg Hindman, Pat Pelland, Greg Masters Nearfield Systems Inc., Torrance, CA 952, USA ghindman@nearfield.com, ppelland@nearfield.com, gmasters@nearfield.com
More informationCrystal Quality Analysis Group
Crystal Quality Analysis Group Contents Contents 1. Overview...1 2. Measurement principles...3 2.1 Considerations related to orientation and diffraction conditions... 3 2.2 Rocking curve measurement...
More informationFast pattern recognition with the ATLAS L1Track trigger for the HL-LHC
Fast pattern recognition with the ATLAS L1Track trigger for the HL-LHC On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Uppsala Universitet E-mail: mikael.martensson@cern.ch ATL-DAQ-PROC-2016-034 09/01/2017 A fast
More informationCT Reconstruction with Good-Orientation and Layer Separation for Multilayer Objects
17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, 25-28 Oct 2008, Shanghai, China CT Reconstruction with Good-Orientation and Layer Separation for Multilayer Objects Tong LIU 1, Brian Stephan WONG 2, Tai
More informationGEANT4 Simulation of MOLLER Experiment
GEANT4 Simulation of MOLLER Experiment Mark Dalton UVa (for Dustin McNulty, Luis Mercado and the MOLLER Collaboration) Outline Introduction to the MOLLER experiment Simulation Overview Spectrometer Design
More informationGLAST Silicon Microstrip Tracker Status
R.P. Johnson Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics University of California at Santa Cruz Mechanical Design Detector Procurement Work list for the Prototype Tracker Construction. ASIC Development Hybrids
More informationSiPMs for Čerenkov imaging
SiPMs for Čerenkov imaging Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Trends in Photon Detectors in Particle Physics and Calorimetry, Trieste, June 2-4, 2008 Contents Photon detectors
More informationMONTE CARLO EVALUATION OF DEFINITE INTEGRALS
MISN-0-355 MONTE CARLO EVALUATION OF DEFINITE INTEGRALS by Robert Ehrlich MONTE CARLO EVALUATION OF DEFINITE INTEGRALS y 1. Integrals, 1-2 Dimensions a. Introduction.............................................1
More informationUpdated impact parameter resolutions of the ATLAS Inner Detector
Updated impact parameter resolutions of the ATLAS Inner Detector ATLAS Internal Note Inner Detector 27.09.2000 ATL-INDET-2000-020 06/10/2000 Szymon Gadomski, CERN 1 Abstract The layout of the ATLAS pixel
More informationUNCOMPROMISING QUALITY
ION CHAMBERS UNCOMPROMISING QUALITY Designed with over 30 years of scientific integrity for a broad range of dosimetry measurements in diverse radiation beams Farmer-type Chambers For absolute dosimetry
More informationLaboratório de Raios Cósmicos Prof. Fernando Barão. Apresentação do: LRCsimulator. Gonçalo Guiomar Miguel Orcinha
Laboratório de Raios Cósmicos Prof. Fernando Barão Apresentação do: LRCsimulator Gonçalo Guiomar Miguel Orcinha 0. Plan for the presentation Scintillator Study Trapezoid Study Cosmic-ray Air Shower Study
More informationBeam test measurements of the Belle II vertex detector modules
Beam test measurements of the Belle II vertex detector modules Tadeas Bilka Charles University, Prague on behalf of the Belle II Collaboration IPRD 2016, 3 6 October 2016, Siena, Italy Outline Belle II
More informationThe CMS alignment challenge
The CMS alignment challenge M. Weber a for the CMS Collaboration a I. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen, Germany Abstract The CMS tracking detectors are of unprecedented complexity: 66 million pixel
More informationGood Practice guide to measure roundness on roller machines and to estimate their uncertainty
Good Practice guide to measure roundness on roller machines and to estimate their uncertainty Björn Hemming, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Finland Thomas Widmaier, Aalto University School
More informationExpected Performances of the scintillator counters Time Of Flight system of the AMS-02 experiment
Expected Performances of the scintillator counters Time Of Flight system of the AMS-02 experiment Cristina Sbarra for the AMS-TOF Bologna group (sbarra@bo.infn.it) INFN-Bologna (Italy) Cristina Sbarra
More informationSYNRAD3D PHOTON PROPAGATION AND SCATTERING SIMULATIONS
ECLOUD PROCEEDINGS SYNRAD3D PHOTON PROPAGATION AND SCATTERING SIMULATIONS G. Dugan, D. Sagan, CLASSE, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, US INTRODUCTION The Bmad software library [] has been used very successfully
More informationCOORDINATE MEASUREMENT MACHINES AS AN ALIGNMENT TOOL *
.. SLAC-PUB-5506 March 1991 (W COORDINATE MEASUREMENT MACHINES AS AN ALIGNMENT TOOL * Bernd T. Wand Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford,CA 94309 1. ABSTRACT In February of 1990
More informationThe AMS-02 Anticoincidence Counter. Philip von Doetinchem I. Phys. Inst. B, RWTH Aachen for the AMS-02 Collaboration DPG, Freiburg March 2008
I. Phys. Inst. B, RWTH Aachen for the AMS-02 Collaboration DPG, Freiburg March 2008 Cosmic Rays in the GeV Range world average SUSY DM KK DM good agreement of data and propagation models, but some unexplained
More informationStraightness measurement
Page 1 of 45 Straightness measurement User guide This manual is available in English only 2000-2001 Renishaw - 8 August 2001 Issue 5.1 Procedure for performing straightness measurement Straightness measurements
More informationReflection and Refraction
Reflection and Refraction INTRODUCTION Geometric optics is one of the oldest branches of physics, dealing with the laws of refraction and reflection. The law of reflection 1 was known to the ancient Greeks
More informationPre-Lab Quiz / PHYS 224 Dispersion and Prism
Pre-Lab Quiz / PHYS 224 Dispersion and Prism Name Lab Section 1. What do we investigate in this lab? 2. Describe Snell s Law and draw a diagram. 3. As shown in Figure 4, the specific angle of the prism
More information