Workshop on PJM ARR and FTR Market 2012/2013

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Workshop on PJM ARR and FTR Market 2012/2013"

Transcription

1 Workshop on PJM ARR and FTR Market 2012/ PJM

2 Training Objectives At the completion of this training, you should be able to Understand the concepts and principles of Auction Revenue Rights and Financial Transmission Rights Understand how to participate in the Annual ARR Allocation and FTR Auctions Understand the Market Settlements for FTRs and ARRs Describe the Market Participant activities that can be performed using PJM eftr 2

3 Agenda (AM) Introduction / FTR Market Schedule Overview of Financial Transmission Rights (FTRs) Overview of Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) Overview of Simultaneous Feasibility Test (SFT) Break Long-Term Transmission Rights Annual Allocation Process Lunch 3

4 Agenda (PM) FTR Auctions & Bilateral Trading Market Settlements Annual ARR Allocation Example Annual FTR Auction Example 4

5 Appendices and References Appendix A: FTR Auction Clearing Mechanism Appendix B: eftr - Market User Interfaces Appendix C: ARR Reassignment Example Other Documents about FTRs available on PJM.com FTR Manual eftr User Guide Frequently Asked Questions 5

6 6

7 Introduction PJM

8 What are ARRs Auction Revenue Rights are entitlements allocated annually to Firm Transmission Service Customers that entitle the holder to receive an allocation of the revenues (or charges) from the Annual FTR Auction 8

9 Financial Transmission Rights are financial instruments awarded to bidders in the FTR Auctions that entitle the holder to a stream of revenues (or charges) based on the hourly Day Ahead congestion price differences across the path What are FTRs? 9

10 ARR/FTR Relationship ARRs provide revenue stream to the firm transmission customer to offset purchase price of FTRs Entire PJM System Capability Annual Allocation ARRs Allocated (MWs) Auction Revenue Rights Annual FTR Auction FTRs Awarded To Bidders (MWs & Price) Auction Revenue 10

11 FTR Market Schedule PJM

12 2012/2013 ARR/FTR Annual and Long Term Auction Timeline 12

13 2012/2013 Annual ARR/FTR Market Timeline 13

14 Annual ARR/FTR Market Timeline Annual Allocation Stage 1A Participants may relinquish Stage 1 ARRs Annual Allocation Stage 1B Annual Allocation Stage 2 (3 Rounds) ARR Trading Annual FTR Auction (4 Rounds) February 29, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 12, April 2, 2012 April 3, 2012 April 30, 2012

15 Date Annual Allocation Stage 1 Activity February 29, 2012 Window opens at 0001 to submit requests for ARRs for Stage 1A. March 1, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 8, 2012 March 9, 2012 Window closes for Stage 1A. All ARR requests submitted by 1700 via eftr. Deadline for PJM to post awarded ARRs for Stage 1A by Window opens at 0001 to submit requests for ARRs for Stage 1B. Window closes for Stage 1B. All ARR requests submitted by 1700 via eftr. Deadline for PJM to post awarded ARRs for Stage 1B by Participants may relinquish Stage 1 ARRs. 15

16 Annual Allocation Stage 2 Opens 0001 Closes 1700 Results 1700 Round 1 March 12, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 16, 2012 Round 2 March 19, 2012 March 20, 2012 March 23, 2012 Round 3 March 26, 2012 March 27, 2012 March 30, 2012 u*arrs will start June 1, 2012, and end May 31,

17 Date April 2, 2012 Activity ARR trading period ends. ARR Trading 17

18 Annual FTR Auction Opens 0001 Closes 1700 Results 1700 Round 1 April 3, 2012 April 5, 2012 April 9, 2012 Round 2 April 10, 2012 April 12, 2012 April 16, 2012 Round 3 April 17, 2012 April 19, 2012 April 23, 2012 Round 4 April 24, 2012 April 26, 2012 April 30, 2012 u*ftrs will start June 1, 2012, and end May 31,

19 Long Term FTR Auction Opens 0001 Closes 1700 Results 1700 Round 1 June 1, 2012 June 5, 2012 June 12, 2012 Round 2 September 4, 2012 September 6, 2012 Round 3 December 3, 2012 December 5, 2012 September 13, 2012 December 12, 2012 u*ftrs will start June 1, 2013, June 1, 2014, or June 1,

20 20

21 Overview of Financial Transmission Rights (FTRs) PJM

22 What are FTRs? Financial Transmission Rights are financial instruments awarded to bidders in the FTR Auctions that entitle the holder to a stream of revenues (or charges) based on the hourly Day Ahead congestion price differences across the path 22

23 Challenge: Why do we need FTRs? LMP exposes PJM Market Participants to price uncertainty for congestion cost charges During constrained conditions, PJM Market collects more from loads than it pays generators Solution: Provides ability to have price certainty FTRs provide hedging mechanism that can be traded separately from transmission service? 23

24 Characteristics of FTRs Economic value based on Day-Ahead Congestion Prices Defined from source to sink can be in form of obligation or option obligation can be benefit or liability option can be benefit but never liability Financial entitlement, not physical right Independent of energy delivery Must be simultaneously feasible 24

25 Economic Value of FTRs FTR Target Allocation = (FTR MW ) * (Congestion Price FTR Sink Congestion Price FTR Source) FTR Target Allocation is equal to the FTR MW amount times the congestion price difference from the FTR sink point to the FTR source point Congestion Price based on the clearing prices from Day-Ahead Market If Congestion Price FTR Sink < Congestion Price FTR Source the FTR is a liability if FTR defined as Obligation the FTR has zero value if defined as Option 25

26 How are FTRs Acquired? FTRs are acquired in several market mechanisms 1. Annual FTR Auction multi - round entire system capability minus approved Long-Term FTRs 2. Long-Term FTR Auction multi - round purchase residual system capability assuming the self-scheduling of ARRs 3. Monthly FTR Auction single - round purchase left over capability 4. FTR Secondary Market bilateral trading 26

27 Types of FTR Products FTRs can be acquired in two forms FTR Obligations FTR Options 27

28 What are FTR Obligations Worth? Benefit the hourly congestion value is positive FTR same direction as congested flow Liability the hourly congestion value is negative FTR opposite direction as congested flow 28

29 What are FTR Options Worth? A Benefit the hourly congestion value is positive FTR same direction as the congested flow. Neither a Benefit or a Liability the hourly congestion value is zero FTR opposite direction to the congested flow. FTR Option cannot have negative value 29

30 FTR Credits and Congestion Charges Congestion Charge = MWh*(Day-ahead Sink Congestion Price - Day-ahead Source Congestion Price) FTR Credit = MW*(Day-ahead Sink Congestion Price - Day-ahead Source Congestion Price) 30

31 FTR Obligation is a Benefit Thermal Limit FTR Obligation = 100 MW Bus A Source (Sending End) Congestion Price = $15 Energy Delivery = 100 MWh Bus B Sink (Receiving End) Congestion Price = $30 Congestion Charge = 100 MWh * ($30-$15) = $1500 FTR Obligation Credit = 100 MW * ($30-$15) = $

32 FTR Obligation is a Liability Thermal Limit FTR Obligation = 100 MW Bus A Source (Sending End) Congestion Price = $15 Energy Delivery = 100 MWh Bus B Sink (Receiving End) Congestion Price = $30 Congestion Charge = 100 MWh * ($30-$15) = $1500 FTR Obligation Credit = 100 MW * ($15-$30) = $

33 FTR Option is a Benefit Thermal Limit FTR Option= 100 MW Bus A Source (Sending End) Congestion Price = $15 Energy Delivery = 100 MWh Congestion Price = $30 Congestion Charge = 100 MWh * ($30-$15) = $1500 FTR Option Credit = 100 MW * ($30-$15) = $1500 Bus B Sink (Receiving End) 33

34 FTR Option is Neither a Benefit/Liability Thermal Limit FTR Option= 100 MW Bus A Source (Sending End) Congestion Price = $15 Energy Delivery = 100 MWh Bus B Sink (Receiving End) Congestion Price = $30 Congestion Charge = 100 MWh * ($30-$15) = $1500 FTR Option Credit = 100 MW * ($15-$30) = $-1500 = $0 ***When calculated, the FTR Option Credit is negative, therefore the economic value will equal zero.****** 34

35 Summary FTRs are financial instruments used to hedge congestion costs FTRs can be acquired in the Annual FTR Auction, Long-Term FTR Auction, Monthly FTR Auction, or Secondary Market FTRs can be Obligations or Options obligation can be benefit or liability option can be benefit but never liability FTRs must be simultaneously feasible 35

36 36

37 Overview of Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) PJM

38 What are ARRs? Auction Revenue Rights are entitlements allocated annually to Firm Transmission Service Customers that entitle the holder to receive an allocation of the revenues (or charges) from the Annual FTR Auction 38

39 Annual ARR Allocation Allocated to Firm Transmission Service Customers annually in a two-stage allocation process First stage protects native load utilization of the transmission system providing long-term certainty Second stage provides flexibility to adjust hedging paths annually property rights allocated to Firm Transmission Customers as Auction Revenue Rights Supports retail programs by reassigning ARRs/FTRs as load switches between LSEs within planning period 39

40 Characteristics of ARRs Economic value based on LMPs from the Annual FTR Auction Defined from source to sink Only available as an obligation obligation can be benefit or liability Financial entitlement, not physical right Must be simultaneously feasible 40

41 Economic Value of ARR ARR Target Allocation = (ARR MW ) * (LMP ARR Sink - LMP ARR Source ) ARR Target Allocation is equal to the ARR MW amount times the average price difference from the ARR sink point to the ARR source point over the 4 rounds LMPs based on the average nodal clearing prices over the 4 rounds of the Annual FTR Auction ARRs can be a benefit or a liability 41

42 How are ARRs Acquired? ARRs are acquired in the following mechanisms 1. Annual Allocation Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) requested by Firm Transmission Customers are allocated on an annual basis 2. Daily ARR Reassignment ARRs allocated for the planning period will be reassigned on a proportional basis within a zone as load switches between LSEs within the planning period 42

43 What can the holder do with the ARR? Convert ARR into FTR by self-scheduling FTR into Annual Auction on exact same path as ARR Reconfigure ARR by bidding into Annual Auction to acquire FTR on alternative path or for alternative product May retain allocated ARR and receive associated allocation of revenues from the auction 43

44 Daily ARR Reassignment ARRs allocated for the planning period will be reassigned daily on a proportional basis within a zone as load switches between LSEs within the planning period. An LSE that loses load in a zone will lose ARRs if the LSE has a net positive economic ARR position for that zone An LSE that loses load in a zone will not lose ARRs if the LSE has a net negative economic ARR position for that zone An LSE that opted for a direct allocation of FTRs and that loses load will lose a proportional share of each FTR 44

45 Daily ARR Reassignment Process STEP 1 How Does Load Shifts? STEP 2 Who Loses ARR? STEP 3 Who Gains ARR? Compare each LSE s daily deviation of Network Peak Load in zone Analyze each LSE s net economic position. For each LSE losing load AND have a net positive position for that zone, a. determine load lost % b. reduce each ARR owned by that percentage Assign total set of forfeited ARRs to LSEs that gain load in zone a. determine percentage of ARRs to be assigned to each LSE gaining load b. assign LSE gaining load % of each ARR in this set of forfeited ARRs 45

46 Daily ARR Reassignment March A reassignment will occur on June 1 by comparing the actual June 1 load contribution to the estimated June 1 load contribution Daily ARR Reassignments Jan 1 June 1 ARRs are allocated in March for the next planning period using an estimate of peak load contributions for June 1 An ARR reassignment for January 1 will not be conducted because new zonal loads are uploaded and allocated on January 1 46

47 Residual ARRs ARRs prorated in Stage 1 of the Annual ARR Allocation may be allocated Residual ARRs for increased transmission capability made available by certain transmission upgrades made during the planning year that were not modeled in the Annual ARR Allocation. Residual ARR MWs plus previously awarded Stage 1 and Stage 2 MWs cannot exceed the Network Service Peak Load value for a particular participant Residual ARRs are effective the first month the increased transmission capability is modeled in the Monthly FTR Auction Economic value of Residual ARRs are based on the MW amount and the nodal clearing price difference between the source and sink nodes for FTR Obligations resulting from each monthly FTR Auction the Residual ARR is effective. 47

48 Summary ARRs entitle the holder to receive allocation of Annual FTR Auction revenues ARRs are allocated to Firm Transmission Service Customers ARRs may be converted to an FTR by self-scheduling the ARR into the Annual FTR Auction ARRs are reassigned on a proportional basis within a zone as load switches between LSEs within the planning period ARRs are only available as an obligation obligation can be benefit or liability ARRs must be simultaneously feasible Residual ARRs may be available within a planning period for increased transmission capability 48

49 Overview of Simultaneous Feasibility Test (SFT) PJM

50 What is a Simultaneous Feasibility Test? Test to ensure that all subscribed transmission entitlements are within the capability of the existing transmission system Test to ensure the PJM Energy Market is revenue adequate under normal system conditions NOT a system reliability test NOT intended to model actual system conditions 50

51 Feasibility of ARRs and FTRs ARRs must be simultaneously feasible to ensure that Annual FTR Auction revenues are sufficient to cover ARR Target Allocations FTRs must be simultaneously feasible to ensure that total congestion charges collected from Day Ahead and Balancing Markets are sufficient to cover FTR Target Allocations 51

52 Test Conditions and Criteria FTRs or ARRs are modeled as generation at source point and load at sink point Single contingency test criteria Perform DC powerflow analysis to evaluate ability of all system facilities to remain within normal thermal ratings evaluate ability to sustain the loss of any single contingency event with all system facilities remaining within applicable short-term, emergency ratings 52

53 SFT Data Inputs u Uncompensated Parallel Flow Injections u Transmission Outages u Existing FTRs or ARRs u Facility Ratings u PJM Network Model u List of Contingencies u Interface Ratings SFT (DC Powerflow) 53

54 SFT Example #1 180 MW 300 MW A Net Flow = 480 MW 500 MW Rating B 180 MW 300 MW FTR 1 : 300 MW Obligation from A to B FTR 2 : 180 MW Obligation from A to B Net Flow on Line A-B = 480 MW Line A-B Flow = Line A-B Rating therefore both FTRs are simultaneously feasible 54

55 SFT Example #2 300 MW 300 MW A Net Flow = 600 MW 500 MW Rating B 300 MW 300 MW FTR 1 : 300 MW Obligation from A to B FTR 2 : 300 MW Obligation from A to B Net Flow on Line A-B = 600 MW Line A-B Flow > Line A-B Rating therefore both FTRs are NOT simultaneously feasible 55

56 Revenue Adequacy using SFT Examples Day Ahead Market Congestion Price = $10 Congestion Price = $20 Energy Flow = 500 MW A B 500 MW Rating Day Ahead Congestion Charge = 500 MW ($20 - $10) = $5,000 FTR Target Allocation (using SFT Example 1 FTRs) Total FTR Target Allocation = 480 MW ($20 - $10) = $4,800 FTR Target Allocation (using SFT Example 2 FTRs) Total FTR Target Allocation = 600 MW ($20 - $10) = $6,000 56

57 SFT Example #3 Net Flow = 500 MW 1000 MW 500 MW A 500 MW Rating B 1000 MW 500 MW FTR 1 : 500 MW Obligation from B to A FTR 2 : 1000 MW Obligation from A to B Net Flow on Line A-B = 500 MW Line A-B Flow = Line A-B Rating therefore both FTRs are simultaneously feasible 57

58 SFT Example # MW 500 MW A Net Flow = 500 MW or 1000 MW 500 MW Rating B 1000 MW 500 MW FTR 1 : 500 MW Option from B to A FTR 2 : 1000 MW Obligation from A to B Net Flow on Line A-B = 500 MW - or Net Flow on Line A-B = 1000 MW (must ignore counterflow created by Option) Line A-B Flow > Line A-B Rating therefore both FTRs are NOT simultaneously feasible 58

59 Revenue Adequacy using SFT Examples Day Ahead Market Congestion Price = $10 Energy Flow = 500 MW Congestion Price = $20 A B 500 MW Rating Day Ahead Congestion Charge = 500 MW ($20 - $10) = $5,000 FTR Target Allocation (using SFT Example 3 FTRs) FTR 1 Target Allocation = 500 MW ($10 - $20) = -$5,000 FTR 2 Target Allocation = 1000 MW ($20 - $10) = $10,000 Total FTR Target Allocation = $5,000 FTR Target Allocation (using SFT Example 4 FTRs) FTR 1 Target Allocation = 500 MW ($10 - $20) = 0 FTR 2 Target Allocation = 1000 MW ($20 - $10) = $10,000 Total FTR Target Allocation = $10,000 59

60 Maintaining Feasibility Feasibility of requests is maintained by: Annual Allocation requests prorated in proportion to MWs requested and inverse proportion to effect on binding constraint Annual/Long-Term/Monthly Auctions requests awarded to highest bidder 60

61 Long-Term Transmission Rights 61

62 LTTR Rules Provide a LTTR based on a priority Stage 1A ARR allocation for base load that ensures longer term certainty with flexibility to opt-out on an annual basis. Creates a link between the PJM planning process and the Stage 1A ARR allocation to ensure transmission system is upgraded to maintain Stage 1A ARRs for base load plus projected 10 year growth of base load Provides a mechanism to establish new Stage 1A resources to cover base load plus projected 10-year growth of base load. Provides a mechanism to replace existing stage 1 resource points with alternative stage 1 resources Provides a mechanism for identifying upgrades and cost needed to support requests for 30-year ARRs. Provides a process to purchase Long-Term FTRs on an annual basis that covers one or three planning years. 62

63 Stage 1A ARR Allocation Network customers request stage 1A ARRs up to their pro-rata share of the zonal base load from historic resources Qualifying transmission customers request stage 1A ARRs up to 50% of transmission reservation MW amount Maintains flexibility of an annual ARR by allocating each year in annual allocation process giving holder ability to opt-out A savings clause protects stage 1A ARRs for a 10- year period if subsequent statutory or regulatory changes are introduced A link between the PJM planning process and the Stage 1A ARR allocation to ensure transmission system is upgraded to maintain Stage 1A ARRs for base load plus projected 10 year growth of base load 63

64 Stage 1A link to Planning Process PJM will conduct annual SFT of Stage 1A ARRs to assess feasibility for each year remaining in the term of the rights Zonal growth rate applied to each zone s base load to develop zonal base loads for years 2 through 10 SFT of all requested Stage 1A ARRs plus additional ARRs to cover load growth Zonal load growth covered by "dispatching" the Stage 1 resources available to each zone in economic order according to historic LMP values If an SFT violation occurs in any year of the analysis then upgrade is identified and recommended for inclusion into the PJM RTEP 64

65 Addition of New Stage 1 Resources New Base resources may be designated if the MW amount of a zone s Stage 1 resources are less than the zonal Base Load. must be either self-owned resources or supply contracts for firm capacity and energy having a contract term of ten years or greater new resource must be simultaneously feasible with all existing Stage 1 and 2 ARRs new resource must be simultaneously feasible with all eligible Stage 1A ARRs in 10-year SFT model 65

66 Alternate Stage 1 Resources Network Customers may replace, on a going forward basis, its current Stage 1 historic resource points and MWs with alternative Stage 1 source point(s) of an electrically equivalent MW amount Electrically equivalent defined as consuming an equal or lesser amount of transmission capability on constraints without creating new overloads must be either self-owned resources or supply contracts for firm capacity and energy having a contract term of ten years or greater must be simultaneously feasible with all existing Stage 1 and 2 ARRs must be simultaneously feasible with all eligible Stage 1A ARRs in 10-year SFT model Total Alternative Stage 1 source point(s) MWs allowed cannot exceed MWs associated with original Stage 1 ARRs 66

67 30-Year Incremental ARRs Section 7.8 of Schedule 1 of OA gives any party the right to obtain LT 30-year Incremental ARRs provided the party fully funds the upgrade needed to support the requested rights Part VI of Tariff sets up a single queue for processing these requests along with interconnection requests (generation and merchant transmission) and transmission service requests On Attachment EE, Customer specifies IARR source, sink and MW amount PJM will assess feasibility of request against existing base system ARR capability and stage 1A ARR capability for future 10 year period In system impact study, PJM will determine upgrades and cost needed to make the request feasible In accordance with existing rules, the customer funding such transmission upgrades will be entitled to the incremental 30-year ARRs created by the upgrade. 67

68 Long-Term FTRs On an annual basis, subsequent to the annual FTR auction, PJM conducts a long-term auction for FTRs effective for the three planning years following the planning year of the current annual FTR auction. The Long-Term FTR Auction offers for sale the residual system capability available assuming the self-scheduling of ARRs that may occur on an annual basis. These ARRs will be modeled as fixed injections and withdrawals in the Long-Term FTR Auction along with already approved Long-Term FTRs The Long-Term FTR Auction is a multi-round auction consisting of three rounds in which one-third of the feasible FTR capability will be offered in each round. FTR Option products are not available in the Long-Term FTR Auctions FTR acquired in the Long-Term FTR Auctions may have terms of one year, for each of the three planning years covered by the auction, or a term of three years, for the entire three-year period covered by the auction. 68

69 Annual Allocation Process PJM

70 Characteristics of the Annual Allocation Long Term Allocation on an annual basis ARRs are acquired for duration of Planning Period Allocated to Firm Transmission Service Network Integration Service Firm Point to Point Entire Capability of the Transmission System Within Planning Period, Network ARRs are reassigned as load shifts Shorter term Pt-to-Pt ARRs may be requested via OASIS 70

71 Characteristics of the Annual Allocation (cont.) Two Stage Allocation Process Stage1 assigns candidate ARR sources for each zone from resources historically designated to serve load in the zone Stage 1A for historical resources up to base load Base Load defined as minimum of daily peak loads for each transmission zone from previous year escalated by one-year s projected load growth. Maximum MW available to each historical resource will be share of the historical resource capability. Qualifying Firm Point-to-Point Customers may request up to 50% of the qualifying transmission service reservation MW level Stage 1B for historical resources up to peak load Maximum MW available to each historical resource will be share of the historical resources capability minus Stage 1A MWs allocated from resource. Qualifying Firm Point-to-Point Customers may submit request for the remainder of their qualifying transmission service reservation MW level that was not covered by Stage 1A ARR MWs 71

72 Characteristics of the Annual Allocation (cont.) Stage 2 is a 3 round iterative approach which allows LSEs to request additional ARRs from a variety of potential ARR source points Total MWs requested by LSE cannot exceed LSE s share of zonal peak load and each round of Stage 2 is limited to 1/3 of the remaining peak load amount not covered in Stage 1 allocation 72

73 Stage 1A and 1B Stage 2 Annual Allocation ustage 1A and Stage 1B performed separately with both using a Single Allocation Process uthe ARR source is designated from Generation Resources that historically served load in each transmission zone or historic load aggregation Zone uentire system capability is available for allocation u3 Round Allocation Process uthe ARR source is designated from any generation bus, hub, zone or interface u1/3 of remaining system capability allocated in each round Sink points are zone or aggregate where load is located 73

74 Stage 1 Annual Allocation Process Stage 1 Annual Allocation Process Stage 1A performed prior to Stage 1B each LSE in a zone assigned a pro-rata amount of the MW capability from each historical generation resource assigned to the zone LSE chooses the set of ARRs that it wants to request based on the resources assigned ARRs must source at the designated resource and sink at the LSE s aggregate load in the transmission zone or load aggregation zone ARR request is limited to an amount not greater that the assigned resource MW capability Total ARR MW request cannot exceed LSE share of zonal base load for Stage 1A and zonal peak load in stage 1B 74

75 Stage 1 Annual Allocation Process Stage 1 - Annual Allocation Process (cont) Firm Pt-to-Pt requests are made for reservations deemed as Qualifying up to 50% of Reservation MW level for Stage 1A and remainder in Stage 1B PJM performs Simultaneous Feasibility Test (SFT) to determine the set of ARRs that can be awarded to each LSE PJM notifies each LSE of the ARR awards and binding constraints from Stage 1A and Stage 1B A participant may surrender any portion of the ARRs awarded in Stage 1 prior to commencement of Stage 2 subject to Simultaneous Feasibility 75

76 Historical Generation Resource Stage 1 - Valid Sources PJM determines a set of eligible ARR sources for each transmission zone or for each historic load aggregation zone within a transmission zone based on the historical reference year that corresponds to the LMP-based market implementation for the transmission zone Historic load aggregation zone is sub-region of a zone that was served under a separate set of supply contracts than other load in zone 1998 = Reference Year for PJM 2002 = Reference Year for APS and RECO 2004 = Reference Year for ComEd, AEP, Dayton, DUQ 2005 = Reference Year for Dominion 2010 = Reference Year for ATSI 76

77 Stage 1 - Annual Allocation Process Stage 1 Opens MW Capability Assigned to each LSE Requests Submitted Simultaneous Feasibility Test Requests Approved PJM will assign each LSE a prorata amount of the MW capability from each historical generation resource LSE submits ARR request via eftr LSE chooses the set of ARRs that it wants to request based on the resources assigned Request is limited to an amount not greater than the designated MW Amount Limited to LSEs share of zonal base load for Stage 1A and peak load for Stage 1B Qualifying Pt-to-Pt customers submit ARR request via /spreadsheet All requests are tested for feasibility by PJM. Approved ARRs and binding constraints are posted on eftr 77

78 Stage 1 Reminder to AEP Zonal Customers In Stage 1, AEP zonal customers with zonal settlement will request ARRs that sink at the AEP w.o. MON Power aggregate and the MON Power aggregate Pro-rata share of AEP NSPL is allocated to the AEP w.o. MON Power and MON Power stage 1 zones AEP stage 1 resources are assigned to load located in the AEP w.o. MON Power aggregate and will sink at this aggregate APS stage 1 resources are assigned to load located in MON Power aggregate and will sink at this aggregate In Stage 2, AEP zonal customers with zonal settlement will request ARRs that sink at the AEP zone 78

79 Stage1 Configuration for AEP Zonal Customers AMOS MW HATFIELD MW 16.4 MW APS AEP w.o. MON Power 1.2% 98.8% MON Power 79

80 Stage 2 Annual Allocation Process Stage 2 Annual Allocation Process Stage 2 is an iterative allocation process that consists of three sequential rounds, with 1/3 of the remaining system ARR capability allocated in each round LSE may view results of each round before submitting ARR request for the next round In each round, LSE chooses the set of ARRs that it wants to request from any generator bus, hub, external interface or zone Total ARR MWs requested by LSE in each round of Stage 2 is limited to 1/3 of the remaining peak load amount not covered in Stage 1 allocation 80

81 Stage 2 Annual Allocation Process Stage 2 - Annual Allocation Process (cont) Qualifying Pt-to-Pt requests in each round of Stage 2 is limited to 1/3 of the service level not covered in Stage 1 allocation Firm Pt-to-Pt Transmission not deemed as Qualifying but subject to base transmission charge eligible for ARR requests in Stage 2 PJM performs Simultaneous Feasibility Test (SFT) to determine the set of ARRs that can be awarded to each LSE PJM notifies each LSE of the ARR awards and binding constraints after each round of Stage 2 81

82 Stage 2 Annual Allocation Process Stage 2 Opens Requests Submitted in each Round Simultaneous Feasibility Test Each Round Closes Requests Approved LSE submits ARR request via eftr LSE chooses the set of ARRs from any generator bus, hub, external interface or zone ARR request are limited to 1/3 of the Network customer s Peak load remaining unallocated after Stage 1 Pt-to-Pt customers submit ARR request via /spreadsheet All requests are tested for feasibility by PJM 1/3 of remaining system capability awarded in each round Approved ARRs and binding constraints are posted on eftr after each round Stage 2 is an iterative allocation process that consists of four sequential rounds, with 1/3 of the remaining system ARR capability allocated in each round 82

83 Simultaneous Feasibility Test All ARR requests are tested for feasibility. If all ARR requests are simultaneously feasible then all requests can be approved If all ARR requests are not simultaneously feasible then ARRs are allocated proportional to MW requested and inversely proportional to effect on constraint Prorated ARR MW Value = Line Capacity * (Requested ARRs MW) * (1) (Total ARR MWs) (effect on constraint) 83

84 A B Proration Example C D Line AB Capacity = 50 MW Requests # Requested ARRs Path Effect on Line AB Line AB Flow (FTRs) #1 200 MW A to B MW #2 200 MW C to D MW Total Flow on Line AB 150 MW line flow exceeds line capability by 100 MW Requests cannot be fully allocated without exceeding Line A-B capacity 84

85 A B Proration Example (cont.) C D Line AB Capacity = 50 MW Requests # Requested ARRs (FTRs) Path Prorated ARRs (FTRs) Effect on Line AB Line AB Flow #1 200 MW A to B 50 MW [50MW (200MW / 400MW) ( 1 / 0.50)] #2 200 MW C to D 100 MW [50MW(200MW / 400MW)( 1 / 0.25) Total Flow on Line AB MW MW 50 MW ARR requests can be fully allocated 50 MW line capability fully subscribed 85

86 Summary Auction Revenue Rights are allocated to Firm Transmission Service customers (Network and Firm Pointto-Point) ARRs are requested annually during the Annual Allocation and are acquired for the entire next planning period The Annual Allocation is a two-stage allocation process All Requests must be simultaneously feasible Within the Planning Period, Network Service ARRs are reassigned as load shifts within a zone Requests associated with shorter term point-to-point service may be made via OASIS 86

87 Market User Interfaces for Annual Allocation PJM

88 ARR Requests - Stage 1 88

89 ARR Requests - Stage 1 89

90 ARR Requests - Stage 1 90

91 ARR Requests Stage 2 91

92 ARR Results 92

93 FTR Auctions & Bilateral Trading PJM

94 How are FTRs Acquired? FTRs are acquired in several market mechanisms 1. Annual FTR Auction multi - round entire system capability minus approved Long-Term FTRs 2. Long-Term FTR Auction multi - round purchase residual system capability assuming the self-scheduling of ARRs 3. Monthly FTR Auction single - round purchase left over capability 4. FTR Secondary Market bilateral trading 94

95 Characteristics of the Annual FTR Auction Entire FTR capability of the transmission system minus approved Long-Term FTRs Multi-product auction FTR Options & FTR Obligations Multi-round auction consisting of 4 rounds with 25% available in each round Multi-period auction On Peak, Off Peak, 24 Hour FTRs have a term of one-year 95

96 Multi-round FTR Auction The Annual FTR Auction is a multi-round auction consisting of 4 rounds 25% of the feasible FTR capability of the PJM system is awarded in each round FTRs that were awarded in Long-Term FTR Auctions that are effective for Annual Auction interval are modeled as fixed injections FTRs awarded in one round are modeled as fixed injections in future rounds FTRs awarded in Long-Term FTR Auction may be offered for sale in Annual Auction FTRs that are awarded in one round may be offered for sale in subsequent rounds FTRs that are self-scheduled must be submitted in Round 1 96

97 Annual FTR Auction Process Round Begins Quotes Entered Market Clears FTRs Awarded Calculate ARR Target Allocation Round Ends 25% of the feasible system capability is awarded in each of the four rounds FTRs that were awarded in Long-Term FTR Auctions that are effective for Annual Auction interval are modeled as fixed injections Awarded FTRs from each round are modeled as fixed injections in next Round FTRs awarded in Long-Term FTR Auctions may be offered for sale in Annual Auction FTRs that are awarded in one round may be offered for sale in subsequent rounds Auction Revenues distributed to ARR Holders in proportion to the economic value of the ARRs 97

98 Self Scheduled FTRs ARR holders have the option to convert their ARRs into FTRs by Self-Scheduling FTRs in the Annual FTR Auction only Characteristics of Self Scheduled FTRs Same Source and Sink of ARR Up to ARR MW amount Price Taker 24 Hour FTR Obligation Scheduled in Round 1 of Annual FTR Auction 25% of MW amount will clear in each round 98

99 Characteristics of the Long-Term FTR Auctions Residual FTR capability of the transmission system left over capability assuming Self-Scheduling of current planning year ARRs Approved Long-Term FTRs modeled as fixed injections. Single-product auction FTR Obligations only Multi-round auction Consisting of three rounds held 3 months apart with onethird available in each round. Multi-Period auction On Peak, Off Peak, 24 Hour Any of next three planning years or the full three year period following the planning year of the current annual FTR auction FTRs have a term of one year or three years 99

100 Long-Term FTR Auction Valid Bidding Periods Individual year in next three planning periods after current Annual Auction FTRs Three-year period following current Annual Auction FTRs Long-Term Auction FTRs Annual Auction FTRs Year 1 On/Off On/Off On/Off Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 100

101 Multi-round FTR Auction The Long-Term FTR Auction is a multi-round auction consisting of 3 rounds One-third of the feasible FTR capability of the PJM system is awarded in each round The Long-Term FTR Auction offers for sale the residual system capability available assuming the self-scheduling of ARRs that may occur on an annual basis. These ARRs will be modeled as fixed injections and withdrawals in the Long-Term FTR Auction along with already approved Long-Term FTRs. FTRs that are awarded in previous Long-Term FTR Auctions that are effective for the market interval may be sold in either round FTRs that are awarded in round one may be offered for sale in successive rounds 101

102 Characteristics of the Monthly FTR Auctions Residual FTR capability of the transmission system left over capability from Long-Term and Annual FTR Auction Multi-product auction FTR Options & FTR Obligations Single-round auction Multi-Period auction On Peak, Off Peak, 24 Hour Any of next three individual calendar months or remaining full planning period quarters FTRs have a term of one month or a three month quarter 102

103 Monthly FTR Auctions Valid Bidding Periods Next 3 individual calendar months remaining in planning period Any complete planning period quarter remaining in planning period Jun Jul Aug Sep-Oct-Nov Dec-Jan-Feb Mar-Apr-May On/Off On/Off On/Off On/Off On/Off On/Off 103

104 FTR Secondary Market Bilateral Trading of existing FTRs only Bulletin Board system in PJM eftr FTRs can be split into smaller increments (duration/mw/period) that total the original FTR New owner takes on cost responsibility of purchased FTR FTRs cannot be reconfigured path and product type (Option or Obligation) must remain same Successful trades in eftr transfer ownership adjustments in Monthly Billing Statement independent trades outside of eftr are not adjusted in Monthly Billing Statement 104

105 Comparison of FTR Auctions Annual FTR Auction Long-Term FTR Auction Monthly FTR Auctions Capability Auctioned Entire FTR capability of the transmission system minus approved Long- Term FTRs Residual FTR capability of the transmission system assuming Self- Scheduling of current planning year ARRs Residual FTR capability of the transmission system Auction Format Multi Round Multi Round Single Round FTR Products FTR Obligations FTR Options FTR Obligations FTR Obligations FTR Options FTR On peak On peak On peak Class Types Off peak Off peak Off peak 24 Hour 24 Hour 24 Hour FTR One Year One Year One Month Period One three-year planning period One three-month planning period quarter 105

106 Valid Sources and Sinks Annual and Long-Term Monthly Monthly FTR Auctions FTR Auctions FTR Auctions Next Calendar Month Quarters and 2 nd /3 rd Month FTR Obligations Valid Sources & Sinks are limited to: Hubs Zones Aggregates Interface Buses Generator Buses Valid Sources & Sinks include any single bus or combination of buses for which a Day-ahead LMP is calculated & posted: Hubs Zones Aggregates Valid Sources & Sinks are limited to: Hubs Zones Aggregates Interface Buses Generator Buses Interface Buses Generator/Load Buses FTR Options* Only a subset of paths will be eligible for FTR Options in order to prevent potential auction clearing performance issues *Option Product not available in Long-Term FTR Auction 106

107 Auction Clearing Mechanism The FTR Auctions maximize the quote based bid value of a set of simultaneous feasible FTRs awarded in the auction. The FTR Auctions evaluate the simultaneous feasibility of all outstanding FTRs, in conjunction with new FTRs to be awarded or surrendered by Market Participants 107

108 FTR Auction Process Bids and Offers for FTRs are submitted via eftr Quotes Entered Market Clears FTRs Awarded Winning Quotes determined Highest bid-based valued combination of simultaneously feasible FTRs are selected Auction Results are posted 108

109 Post FTR Auction Input and Output Uncompensated Parallel Flow Injections Transmission Outage Schedules Pre-existing FTRs Facility Ratings FTR Quotes (Buy or Sell) PJM Network Model List of Contingencies Aggregate Price Definitions FTR Auction Software FTRs Awarded in Auction FTRs Sold in Auction Nodal Prices Option Clearing Prices Aggregate Prices Binding Constraints 109

110 Multi-product FTR Auction FTRs in Annual and Monthly FTR Auctions can be acquired in two forms FTR Obligations FTR Options 110

111 Auctioning of FTR Options The clearing price of an FTR Option Buy Bid will never be less than zero can t be paid for something that has no downside The clearing price of an FTR Option will always be greater than or equal to the clearing price of an FTR Obligation for the same path FTR Options will only be available on a subset of paths 111

112 Overlapping Timeframes The Annual, Long-Term, and Monthly FTR Auctions are multi-period auctions with FTR products that can overlap across multiple timeframes FTR products can be On Peak FTRs, Off Peak FTRs and 24 Hour FTRs FTRs awarded in the Annual FTR Auction have a term of one year FTRs awarded in the Long-Term FTR Auctions have a term of one or three years. The various products are cleared simultaneously and the clearing prices of products which overlap are related 112

113 Multi-period FTR Auction - Example #1 Simple radial system A B Line AB On Peak Rating = 100 MW Line AB Off Peak Rating = 120 MW Auction Results FTR Bids Bid Price MW Cleared Clearing Price On Peak 130 MW $100/MW 100 MW $100/MW Off Peak 130 MW $ 95/MW 120 MW $ 95/MW 24 Hour (On Peak + Off Peak) 130 MW $180/MW 0 MW $195/MW 113

114 Multi-period FTR Auction - Example #2 Simple radial system A B Line AB On Peak Rating = 100 MW Line AB Off Peak Rating = 120 MW Auction FTR Bids Bid Price MW Cleared Clearing Price Results On Peak 90 MW $100/MW 90 MW $ 85/MW Off Peak 130 MW $ 95/MW 110 MW $ 95/MW 24 Hour (On Peak + Off Peak) 130 MW $180/MW 10 MW $180/MW 114

115 Multi-period FTR Auction - Example #3 Simple radial system A B Line AB On Peak Rating = 100 MW Line AB Off Peak Rating = 120 MW Auction FTR Bids Bid Price MW Cleared Clearing Price Results On Peak 90 MW $100/MW 0 MW $115/MW Off Peak 130 MW $ 95/MW 20 MW $ 95/MW 24 Hour (On Peak + Off Peak) 130 MW $210/MW 100 MW $210/MW 115

116 Multi-period FTR Auction - Example #4 Simple radial system A B Line AB On Peak Rating = 100 MW Line AB Off Peak Rating = 120 MW Auction FTR Bids Bid Price MW Cleared Clearing Price Results On Peak 90 MW $150/MW 70 MW $150/MW Off Peak 90 MW $ 95/MW 90 MW $ 20/MW 24 Hour (On Peak + Off Peak) 130 MW $170/MW 30 MW $170/MW 116

117 eftr eftr is an internet application that allows PJM Market Participants to participate in Annual ARR Allocation FTR Auctions FTR Secondary Market 117

118 Submitting Valid Auction Quotes Market Source Sink Class (on-peak, off-peak or 24 hour) Period Hedge (option or obligation) Trade (buy, sell or self-schedule for Round 1 of annual auction) Bid MW Bid Price ($/MW-three year for three year Long-Term FTR product or $/MW-year for yearly product or $/MW-month for monthly product or $/MW-quarter for quarterly product) 118

119 FTR Auction Credit Requirement FTR Auction participants must establish an Auction Credit Limit prior to bidding into auction Credit Requirement for a participant s bids may not exceed Credit Limit Credit Requirement for individual FTR bids is price of the FTR bid minus estimate of revenue from the FTR Participant s Credit Requirement is sum of Credit Requirement for each individual FTR bid offset by total value of Participant s ARRs 119

120 FTR Auction Credit Rules Credit requirements apply to All FTR auctions Use monthly weighted average of past three years (50%-30%- 20%) when calculating historical value Separate historic values for on-peak, off-peak and 24-hour FTRs Discount historical value by 10% when calculating credit requirements for FTR paths with positive expected value and add 10% for FTR paths with negative expected value Specific timetable for credit release No credit requirement for participants that self-schedule their ARRs into FTRs since ARR credits offset FTR costs in full 120

121 FTR Auction Credit Calculation Credit Requirement Calculation 1. Starts with a monthly credit calculation for each FTR Monthly Price minus discounted historical value for each month for each FTR 2. Within each month individual FTR credit numbers are added across all FTRs to result in 12 monthly subtotals for the account. For cleared FTRs only, negative individual FTR credit numbers will offset positive numbers within the same month. ARR credits in the account are subtracted from credit requirements each month. Monthly ARR value 3. Credit requirement is the sum of positive monthly subtotals 121

122 Additional Credit Requirements for Undiversified Portfolios FTR credit requirements for undiversified FTR auction bidding Undiversified Portfolio Definitions Flow Undiversified = the FTR Portfolio is net counterflow which means the total value of the portfolio is negative based on FTR auction clearing prices. Geographically Undiversified = The FTR portfolio is Flow Undiversified and the FTR portfolio has lower projected target allocations because of a single transmission outage. The FTR portfolio is the cumulative position for all current and future FTRs cleared in previous auctions and FTRs cleared in any current preliminary auction case. 122

123 Additional Credit Requirements for Undiversified Portfolios (cont) Diversification check performed after preliminary auction clearing Screen for undiversified portfolios (geographically and by flow) Additional collateral: 2 times absolute value of FTR auction-based value if flow undiversified 3 times absolute value of FTR auction-based value if flow and geographically undiversified PJM issues demand for additional credit as required by diversification test Participants bids are removed from auction if demand not satisfied by 4:00 pm next day 123

124 FTR Credit Example Historical LMPs and Hours HISTORICAL LMP NODE JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY A $23 $25 $27 $23 $18 $56 $52 $49 $47 $35 $29 $25 B $36 $38 $40 $54 $49 $34 $30 $27 $25 $45 $42 $38 C $34 $36 $38 $34 $29 $23 $27 $25 $45 $44 $40 $36 D $14 $20 $24 $65 $60 $42 $31 $33 $29 $44 $26 $22 E $37 $40 $43 $37 $52 $24 $33 $31 $60 $56 $47 $42 F $67 $69 $71 $13 $8 $65 $61 $58 $56 $23 $73 $69 G $34 $36 $38 $26 $21 $45 $41 $38 $36 $32 $40 $36 H $3 $5 $7 $67 $62 $13 $9 $6 $4 $16 $9 $5 Assume On-Peak, Off-Peak, and 24-HR historical LMPs are the same for example. 124

125 FTR Credit Example 125

126 FTR Credit Example (cont) 126

127 Same-Path FTR Bids Calculates the highest possible credit requirement for bids placed on the same path For each set of same-path bids, the credit requirement for each possible outcome is determined and the outcome which produces the highest credit requirement is used to determine the bid credit requirement for the set of same-path bids The price which is determined to cause the highest potential credit requirement will be used for all bids at or above price for buy bids and at or below price for sell offers. 127

128 Example of Credit calculation for same characteristic bids Bid Credit Rule for Same-Path FTRs Bids (cont) Credit Requirements Individual Credit Requirements Same Path Total= $10,684,363 Highest possible credit requirement is at the $300 price so this price is used to determine credit requirement for all bids above $300 Total= $10,498,

129 Summary The FTR Auctions maximize the quote based bid value of a set of simultaneous feasible FTRs awarded in each auction Annual FTR Auction revenues are distributed to ARR Holders in proportion to the economic value of the ARRs The Annual FTR Auction offers for sale the entire FTR capability of the transmission system minus approved Long-Term FTRs for the term of one year The Annual FTR Auction is a multi-product, multi-period, and multi-round auction 129

130 Summary (cont) In the Annual FTR Auction, ARR holders have the option to convert their ARRs into FTRs by Self- Scheduling FTRs this option must be selected in Round 1 The Long-Term FTR Auctions offer FTRs for one or three years after the current Annual FTR Auction where the residual capability after assumed modeled Self- Scheduled ARRs and already approved Long-Term FTRs is available The Monthly FTR Auctions offer for sale or purchase the residual FTR capability of the transmission system for the term of one month or one quarter. The Monthly FTR Auctions are multi-product, multiperiod, single round auctions FTR credit requirements apply to all FTR Auctions 130

131 Market Settlements PJM

132 Annual FTR Auction Settlements The Annual FTR Auction and corresponding ARRs will be settled for on a monthly basis over the course of the planning period for which the Annual FTRs are in effect. Since ARR ownership can change daily through ARR reassignment, PJM Settlements calculates: daily Annual FTR Auction revenues by dividing annual auction revenues by the number of days in the planning period daily ARR credits by dividing ARR Target Allocation by the number of days in the planning period 132

133 Economic Value of ARR ARR Target Allocation = (ARR MW ) * (LMP ARR Sink - LMP ARR Source ) ARR Target Allocation is equal to the ARR MW amount times the average price difference from the ARR sink point to the ARR source point over the 4 rounds LMPs based on the average nodal clearing prices over the 4 rounds of the Annual FTR Auction ARRs can be a benefit or a liability 133

134 ARR Settlements (cont.) If sufficient revenues are collected from the Annual and Monthly FTR Auctions to satisfy ARR Target Allocations then, ARR Credits = ARR Target Allocation Excess auction revenues are used to fund any deficiencies in FTR Target Allocation payments If insufficient revenues are collected from the Annual, Long- Term, and Monthly FTR Auctions to satisfy ARR Target Allocations then, ARR Credits are prorated proportionately ARR deficiencies are funded from (1) any annual excess congestion charges remaining at the end of a planning period after fully funding all FTR target allocations for the planning period then (2) an uplift charge assessed to FTR holders on pro-rata basis according to total Target Allocations for all FTRs held at any time during the planning period 134

135 Long-Term FTR Auction Settlements The Long-Term FTR auctions are billed for in the monthly bill for which the FTRs were in effect. Revenues from the Long-Term FTR auctions are used to first fund any shortfall in ARR Target Allocations then FTR target allocations for the planning period in which the Long-Term FTR is in effect. 135

136 Monthly FTR Auction Settlements The monthly auctions are billed for in the monthly bill for which the FTRs were in effect. Revenues from the monthly auctions are used to first fund ARR Target Allocations then FTR Target Allocations 136

137 FTR Settlements FTR Target Allocation = (FTR MW ) * (Congestion Price FTR Sink Congestion Price FTR Source) FTR Target Allocation is equal to the FTR MW amount times the congestion price difference from the FTR sink point to the FTR source point Congestion Price based on the clearing prices from Day Ahead Market If Congestion Price FTR Sink < Congestion Price FTR Source the FTR is a liability if FTR defined as Obligation the FTR has zero value if defined as Option 137

138 FTR Settlements (cont.) If sufficient congestion charges are collected from the Day Ahead and Balancing Market to satisfy FTR Target Allocations then, FTR Credits = FTR Target Allocation Excess congestion charges are used to cover any deficiencies in FTR Target Allocations within month cover any deficiencies in FTR Target Allocations within planning period any remaining year-end excess covers any deficiencies in ARR Target Allocation from previous months within planning period any remaining year-end excess distributed to FTR participants pro-rata to total FTR Target Allocations If insufficient revenues are collected from the Day Ahead and Balancing Market to satisfy FTR Target Allocations then, FTR Credits are prorated proportionately pro-rata to FTR Target Allocations FTR Target Allocation deficiencies are funded from (1) excess congestion charges from current month and subsequent months then (2) an uplift charge assessed to FTR holders on pro-rata basis according to total Target Allocations for all FTRs held at any time during the planning period 138

139 ANNUAL FTR AUCTION REVENUE MONTHLY FTR AUCTION REVENUE DAY AHEAD MARKET CONGESTION CHARGES BALANCING MARKET CONGESTION CHARGES ARR & FTR Settlements SUM OF MONTHLY ARR TARGET ALLOCATIONS SUM OF MONTHLY FTR TARGET ALLOCATIONS YES ARE ARR TARGET ALLOCATIONS FULLY- FUNDED FOR MONTH? MONTHLY EXCESS ARE FTR TARGET ALLOCATIONS FULLY- FUNDED FOR MONTH? YES NO NO FUND ARRs PRO-RATA TO ARR TARGET ALLCOATION FUND FTRs PRO-RATA TO FTR TARGET ALLOCATION DISTRIBUTE EXCESS ACROSS PRIOR MONTHLY DEFICIENCIES MONTHLY DEFICIENCY MONTHLY DEFICIENCY MONTHLY EXCESS ANNUAL ARR DEFICIENCY BUCKET IF EXCESS EXISTS ANNUAL FTR DEFICIENCY BUCKET ANNUAL EXCESS ARR REVENUE AND CONGESTION CHARGE BUCKET IF EXCESS EXISTS YEARLY DEFICIENCY YEARLY DEFICIENCY DISTRIBUTED TO FTR PARTICPANTS PRO-RATA TO FTR TARGET ALLOCATION FUNDED BY RATIO SHARE OF TOTAL FTR TARGET ALLCOATIONS 139

140 140

141 Annual ARR Allocation Example PJM

142 Annual Allocation Example Demonstrates the following.. How Market Participants request ARRs in Stage 1 How Market Participants request ARRs in Stage 2 How PJM tests all requests for feasibility How PJM approves and allocates ARRs to Market Participants in each Stage 142

143 ARR/FTR Market Timeline Annual Allocation Stage 1A and 1B Annual Allocation Stage 2 (3 Rounds) ARR Trading Annual FTR Auction (4 Rounds) 143

144 System Profiles E 240 MW Thermal Limit D Brighton Sundance A Legend Alta Park City B C Solitude Bus Transmission Line Load Generators 144

145 Market Participants Peak Load = 400 MW Historical Generation Assignment 200 MW from Sundance 280 MW from Solitude Network Transmission Service = 400 MW LSE B Load Serving Entities (LSEs) = 3 Independent Generators = 2 Peak Load = 350 Historical Generation Assignment 300 MW from Brighton LSE C Peak Load = 350 Historical Generation Assignment 300 MW from Brighton LSE D 120 MW from Solitude 120 MW from Solitude Network Transmission Service 350 MW Network Transmission Service 350 MW 145

146 Market Participants Park City Sells to Spot Market Load Serving Entities (LSEs) = 3 Independent Generators = 2 Bilateral with LSE D Firm Service for 70 MW from Bus A to Bus D Alta 146

147 Stage 1A and 1B ARR Requests Submitted Market Participant Peak Load Historical Generation Resource Stage 1 Requested ARRs LSE B 400 MW 200 MW from Sundance 280 MW from Solitude 200 MW from Sundance (Bus D) 200 MW from Solitude (Bus C) LSE C 350 MW 300 MW from Brighton 120 MW from Solitude 300 MW from Brighton (Bus E) 0 MW from Solitude (Bus C) LSE D 350 MW 300 MW from Brighton 120 MW from Solitude 300 MW from Brighton (Bus E) 50 MW from Solitude (Bus C) 147

148 Stage 1A and 1B ARR SFT Summary of Withdrawals and Injections in SFT Injections Withdrawals Ensures all subscribed ARRs are within the capability of the system Ensures that the Annual FTR Auction Revenue is enough to cover economic value of ARRs LSE B LSE C LSE D Brighton Solitude Sundance 400 MW 300 MW 350 MW 600 MW 250 MW 200 MW TOTAL 1050 MW 1050 MW 148

149 Stage 1A and 1B ARR SFT Under the Limit! Brighton 600 MW E 300 MW from E to C 300 MW from E to D Alta A Park City 240 MW Thermal Limit 400 MW B C 200 MW from D to B D 200 MW 350 MW MW 250 MW Sundance Solitude 200 MW from C to B 50 MW from C to D 149

150 Stage 1A and 1B - ARRs Requests Approved All requested ARRs are feasible and can be awarded Market Participant Peak Load Stage 1 Approved ARRs LSE B 400 MW 200 MW from Sundance (Bus D) 200 MW from Solitude (Bus C) LSE C 350 MW 300 MW from Brighton (Bus E) LSE D 350 MW 300 MW from Brighton (Bus E) 50 MW from Solitude (Bus C) 150

151 Stage 1 Allocation - Summary After Stage 1 Allocation.. LSE B and LSE D allocated ARR MWs up to Peak Load not eligible for additional requests in Stage 2 LSE C allocated ARR MWs of 300 MW with Peak Load of 350 MW Eligible to request up to 16.6 MW of ARRs in each round of Stage 2 (16.8 MW in round 1) Line E-D flow = MW after Stage 1 allocation therefore 15.5 MW of Line E-D capability will be allocated in each round of Stage 2 (15.7 in round 1) (240 MW MW) / 3 = 15.5 MW 151

152 Stage 2 Round MW Calculation Stage 2 available is 1/3 remaining after Stage 1 Exact Round percentage distribution Stage 2 Round 1= 33.34% Stage 2 Round 2= 33.33% Stage 2 Round 3= 33.33% Example for total of 50 MW available in Stage 2 Round 1 = 50*.3334= MW Round 2 = 50*.3333= MW Round 3 = 50*.3333= MW Request allowed to be made only to the tenth of a MW Adjusted Round 1 = = 16.8 MW Adjusted Round 2 = = 16.6 MW Adjusted Round 3 = = 16.6 MW 152

153 Stage 2 - ARR Requests Submitted ARR Source Requested ARRs in Stage 2 Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Total Stage 2 ARRs LSE C Brighton (Bus E) 16.8 MW 16.6 MW 16.6 MW 50 MW Alta Alta (Bus A to Bus D) 23.4 MW 23.3 MW 23.3 MW 70 MW Pt-to-Pt customer Alta requests ARRs associated with firm reservation LSE C assumed to request Bus E as ARR source point in each round Stage 2 is a sequential three-round process. This example assumes same requests made in each round. 153

154 Stage 1 + Stage 2 (Round 1) ARR SFT Stage 1 Awarded ARRs Stage 2 (Round 1) Requested ARRs Injections Withdrawals Injections Withdrawals LSE B 400 MW LSE C 16.8 MW LSE C 300 MW Bus D 23.4 MW LSE D 350 MW Brighton 16.8 MW Brighton 600 MW Alta 23.4 MW Solitude Sundance 250 MW 200 MW Summary of Withdrawals and Injections in SFT 154

155 Stage 1 + Stage 2 (Round 1) ARR SFT Brighton Under the Limit! MW E MW from E to C 300 MW from E to D Alta 23.4 MW from A to D A 23.4 MW Park City 209 MW Round 1 Thermal Limit 400 MW B MW C 200 MW from D to B D 200 MW MW MW Sundance Solitude 200 MW from C to B 50 MW from C to D 155

156 Stage 1 + Stage 2 (All Rounds) ARR SFT Stage 1 Awarded ARRs Stage 2 (All Rounds) Requested ARRs Injections Withdrawals Injections Withdrawals LSE B 400 MW LSE C 50 MW LSE C 300 MW Bus D 70 MW LSE D 350 MW Brighton 50 MW Brighton 600 MW Alta 70 MW Solitude 250 MW Sundance 200 MW Summary of Withdrawals and Injections in SFT 156

157 Brighton Under the Limit! 650 MW E 350 MW from E to C 300 MW from E to D Alta 70 MW from A to D Stage 1 + Stage 2 (All Rounds) ARR SFT A 70 MW Park City 240 MW Thermal Limit 400 MW B MW C 200 MW from D to B D 200 MW 420 MW MW Sundance Solitude 200 MW from C to B 50 MW from C to D 157

158 Stage 2 - ARRs Requests Approved All requested ARRs are feasible and can be awarded Market Participant Approved ARRs LSE C 50 MW from Brighton (Bus E) Alta 70 MW from Alta (Bus A) to Bus D (Firm Point-to-Point) 158

159 Final Approved ARRs Stage 1 Approved ARRs Stage 2 Approved ARRs LSE B 200 MW from Sundance (Bus D) 200 MW from Solitude (Bus C) LSE C 300 MW from Brighton (Bus E) 50 MW from Brighton (Bus E) LSE D 300 MW from Brighton (Bus E) 50 MW from Solitude (Bus C) Alta 70 MW from Alta (Bus A) to Bus D (Firm Point-to-Point) 159

160 160

161 Annual FTR Auction Example PJM

162 Annual FTR Auction Example Demonstrates the following.. A Four Round Auction How Market Participants enter bids and offers How Market Participants self-schedule FTRs How PJM clears each Auction Round and awards FTRs How PJM calculates Auction Revenue Right Target Allocations after each round 162

163 Results from Annual ARR Allocation Market Participant Approved ARRs ARRs are awarded to Participants in Annual ARR Allocation LSE B 200 MW from Sundance (Bus D) 200 MW from Solitude (Bus C) LSE C 350 MW from Brighton (Bus E) LSE D 300 MW from Brighton (Bus E) 50 MW from Solitude (Bus C) Alta 70 MW from Alta (Bus A) to Bus D (Firm Point-to-Point) 163

164 Market Participants bid for FTRs in Annual FTR Auction 164

165 Annual FTR Auction Process Round Begins Quotes Entered Market Clears FTRs Awarded Calculate ARR Target Allocation Round Ends 25% of the feasible system capability is awarded in each of the four rounds FTRs that were awarded in Long-Term FTR Auctions that are effective for Annual Auction interval are modeled as fixed injections Awarded FTRs from each round are modeled as fixed injections in next Round FTRs awarded in Long-Term FTR Auctions may be offered for sale in Annual Auction FTRs that are awarded in one round may be offered for sale in subsequent rounds Auction Revenues distributed to ARR Holders in proportion to the economic value of the ARRs 165

166 Annual FTR Auction - Round 1 First 25% of the feasible system capability is awarded in Round 1 FTRs that are self-scheduled must be submitted in Round 1 Round 1 166

167 Round 1- Quotes Entered FTR Path MW Bid Bid Price Round 1 Bids LSE B No Bid LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C MW $ 100/MW LSE D Bus E-to-Bus D MW $ 100/MW Alta No Bid Round 1 Self Scheduled FTRs Round 1 Offers FTR Path MW Price LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 50.0 MW Price Taker No Offers 167

168 Round 1 Market Clears Power Flows & Nodal Prices $0.0 E D $ MW 12.5 MW MW 33 MW MW E-to-C FTR bid awarded in Round 1 A 121 MW $ MW 88 MW MW 80 MW 12.5 MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round 1 $81.92 B C $

169 Round 1- FTRs Awarded Round 1 FTR Path MW Bid/Offer Price MWs Cleared Clearing Price Revenue LSE B No Bid LSE C E-to-C MW $ 100/MW MW $100.00/MW $ 18, LSE D E-to-D MW $ 100/MW 0.0 MW $149.71/MW $ 0.00 LSE D C-to-D 12.5 MW Price Taker 12.5 MW $ 49.71/ MW $ Alta No Bid Round 1 Total Auction Revenue = $18,

170 Round 1 Calculate ARR Target Allocation Revenues are distributed to ARR holders in proportion to (but not to exceed) the economic value of the ARRs which is determined by following equation: ARR Target Allocation = (ARR MW ) * (LMP ARR Sink - LMP ARR Source ) (# of rounds) Round 1 Total Auction Revenue = $18, Round 1 Total Target Allocation =????????? 170

171 Round 1 - Target Allocation Round 1 ARR Holder ARR MW ARR Sink ARR Source ARR MW # of rounds LMP Sink LMP Source ARR Target Allocation LSE B 200 Bus B Bus D 200/4 $ $ $ 3, LSE B 200 Bus B Bus C 200/4 $ $ $ LSE C 350 Bus C Bus E 350/4 $ $ 0.00 $ 8, LSE D 300 Bus D Bus E 300/4 $ $ 0.00 $11, LSE D 50 Bus D Bus C 50/4 $ $ $ Alta 70 Bus D Bus A 70/4 $ $ $ 2, Round 1 Total Target Allocation = $18,

172 Round 1 Summary Results Round 1 Total Auction Revenue = $18, >= Round 1 Total Target Allocation = $18, Round 1 Auction revenues are enough to satisfy Total ARR Target Allocations therefore ARR Credits = ARR Target Allocations Round 1 Total ARR Credits = $18, Round 1 Total Excess = $

173 Round 1 - Auction Payments Round 1 Market Participant FTR Auction Payment ARR Credits Auction Payment - ARR Credit (1) LSE B $ $ 4, $ 4, LSE C $ 18, $ 8, $9, LSE D $ $11, $11, Alta $ 0.00 $2, $2, TOTAL $18, $18, $ (1) Positive values indicate payment net to PJM 173

174 Annual FTR Auction - Round 2 Second 25% of the feasible system capability is awarded in Round 2 Awarded FTRs from Round 1 are modeled as fixed injections in Round 2 25% of Self-Scheduled FTRs from Round 1 are modeled as fixed injections in Round 2 Round 2 174

175 Round 2- Quotes Entered Round 2 Bids LSE B FTR Path MW Bid Bid Price No Bid LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C MW $ 100/MW LSE D Bus E-to-Bus D MW $ 100/MW Alta No Bid Round 2 Offers No Offers 175

176 Round 2-Fixed Injections Awarded FTRs FTR Path Cleared MW Round LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C MW Round 1 LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 1 Self-Scheduled FTRs FTR Path Cleared MW Round LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 1 176

177 Round 2 Market Clears $0.0 E Power Flows & Nodal Prices 120 MW D 25 MW $ MW 67 MW MW E-to-C FTR bid awarded in Round MW E-to-C FTR bid awarded in Round 2 A 242 MW $ MW $81.92 B 175 MW MW C 162 MW 25 MW 12.5 MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round 2 $

178 Round 2- FTRs Awarded Round 2 FTR Path MW Bid/Offer Price MWs Cleared Clearing Price Revenue LSE B No Bid LSE C E-to-C MW $100.00/MW MW $100.00/MW $ 18, LSE D E-to-D MW $100.00/MW 0.0 MW $149.71/MW $ 0.00 LSE D C-to-D 12.5 MW Price Taker 12.5 MW $ 49.71/ MW $ Alta No Bid Round 2 Total Auction Revenue = $18,

179 Round 2 Calculate ARR Target Allocation Revenues are distributed to ARR holders in proportion to (but not to exceed) the economic value of the ARRs which is determined by following equation: ARR Target Allocation = (ARR MW ) * (LMP ARR Sink - LMP ARR Source ) (# of rounds) Round 2 Total Auction Revenue = $18, Round 2 Total Target Allocation =????????? 179

180 Round 2 - Target Allocation Round 2 ARR Holder ARR MW ARR Sink ARR Source ARR MW # of rounds LMP Sink LMP Source ARR Target Allocation LSE B 200 Bus B Bus D 200/4 $ $ $ 3, LSE B 200 Bus B Bus C 200/4 $ $ $ LSE C 350 Bus C Bus E 300/4 $ $ 0.00 $ 8, LSE D 300 Bus D Bus E 300/4 $ $ 0.00 $11, LSE D 50 Bus D Bus C 50/4 $ $ $ Alta 70 Bus D Bus A 70/4 $ $ $ 2, Round 2 Total Target Allocation = $18,

181 Round 2 Summary Results Round 2 Total Auction Revenue = $18, >= Round 2 Total Target Allocation = $18, Round 2 Auction revenues are enough to satisfy Total ARR Target Allocations therefore ARR Credits = ARR Target Allocations Round 2 Total ARR Credits = $18, Round 2 Total Excess = $

182 Round 2 - Auction Payments Round 2 Market Participant FTR Auction Payment ARR Credits Auction Payment - ARR Credit (1) LSE B $ $ 4, $ 4, LSE C $ 18, $ 8, $ 9, LSE D $ $11, $11, Alta $ 0.00 $2, $2, TOTAL $18, $18, $ (1) Positive values indicate payment net to PJM 182

183 Annual FTR Auction - Round 3 Third 25% of the feasible system capability is awarded in Round 3 Awarded FTRs from Round 1 and Round 2 are modeled as fixed injections in Round 3 25% of Self-Scheduled FTRs from Round 1 are modeled as fixed injections in Round 3 Round 3 183

184 Round 3 Quotes Entered Round 3 Bids LSE B FTR Path MW Bid Bid Price No Bid LSE C No Bid LSE D Bus E-to-Bus D MW $ 200/MW Alta Bus A-to-Bus D 70.0 MW $ 100/MW Round 3 Offers FTR Path MW Offer Offer Price LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C 61.5 MW $ 100/MW 184

185 Round 3 Fixed Injections Awarded FTRs FTR Path Cleared MW Round LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C MW Round 1 LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 1 LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C MW Round 2 LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 2 Self-Scheduled FTRs FTR Path Cleared MW Round LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 1 185

186 Round 3 Market Clears $ MW E Power Flows & Nodal Prices 180 MW D MW $ MW MW E-to-C FTR bid awarded Round MW E-to-C FTR bid awarded in Round MW E-to-D FTR bid awarded Round 3 A 282 MW $46.60 $ MW 165 MW 165 MW MW B C 97 MW 99 MW $ MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round MW C-to-D FTR self scheduled awarded in Round MW E-to-C FTR offer awarded in Round 3 186

187 Round 3 - FTRs Awarded Round 3 FTR Path MW Bid/Offer Price MWs Cleared Clearing Price Revenue LSE B No Bid LSE C E-to-C 61.5 MW $100.00/MW 61.5 MW $133.59/MW -$ 8, LSE D E-to-D MW $200.00/MW MW $200.00/MW $ 32, LSE D C-to-D 12.5 MW Price Taker 12.5 MW $ 66.40/MW $ Alta A-to-D 70.0 MW $100.00/MW No Quotes Cleared $153.40/MW Round 3 Total Auction Revenue = $24,

188 Round 3 Calculate ARR Target Allocation Revenues are distributed to ARR holders in proportion to (but not to exceed) the economic value of the ARRs which is determined by following equation: ARR Target Allocation = (ARR MW ) * (LMP ARR Sink - LMP ARR Source ) (# of rounds) Round 3 Total Auction Revenue = $24, Round 3 Total Target Allocation =????????? 188

189 Round 3 - Target Allocation Round 3 ARR Holder ARR MW ARR Sink ARR Source ARR MW # of rounds LMP Sink LMP Source ARR Target Allocation LSE B 200 Bus B Bus D 200/4 $ $ $ 4, LSE B 200 Bus B Bus C 200/4 $ $ $ 1, LSE C 350 Bus C Bus E 350/4 $ $ 0.00 $ 11, LSE D 300 Bus D Bus E 300/4 $ $ 0.00 $ 15, LSE D 50 Bus D Bus C 50/4 $ $ $ Alta 70 Bus D Bus A 70/4 $ $ $ 2, Round 3 Total Target Allocation = $ 24,

190 Round 3 Summary Results Round 3 Total Auction Revenue = $24, >= Round 3 Total Target Allocation = $24, Round 3 Auction revenues are enough to satisfy Total ARR Target Allocations therefore ARR Credits = ARR Target Allocations Round 3 Total ARR Credits = $24, Round 3 Total Excess = $

191 Round 3 - Auction Payments Round 3 Market Participant FTR Auction Payment ARR Credits Auction Payment - ARR Credit (1) LSE B $ $ 5, $ 5, LSE C -$ 8, $ 11, , LSE D $ 33, $15, $ 17, Alta $ 0.00 $2, $ 2, TOTAL $24, $24, $ (1) Positive values indicate payment net to PJM 191

192 Annual FTR Auction - Round 4 Fourth 25% of the feasible system capability is awarded in Round 4 Awarded FTRs from Round 1, Round 2 and Round 3 are modeled as fixed injections in Round 4 25% of Self-Scheduled FTRs from Round 1 are modeled as fixed injections in Round 4 Round 4 192

193 Round 4 Quotes Entered Round 4 Bids LSE B LSE C FTR Path MW Bid Bid Price No Bid No Bid LSE D Bus E-to-Bus D MW $ 500/MW Alta Bus A-to-Bus D 70.0 MW $ 500/MW Round 4 Offers No Offers 193

194 Round 4 Fixed Injections Awarded FTRs FTR Path Cleared MW Round LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C MW Round 1 LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 1 LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C MW Round 2 LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 2 LSE C Bus E-to-Bus C 61.5 MW Round 3 LSE D Bus E-to-Bus D MW Round 3 LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 3 Self-Scheduled FTRs FTR Path Cleared MW Round LSE D Bus C-to-Bus D 12.5 MW Round 1 194

195 Round 4 Market Clears $ MW E 240 MW Power Flows & Nodal Prices D $ MW MW MW E-to-C FTR bid awarded in Round MW E-to-C FTR bid awarded in Round MW E-to-D FTR bid awarded in Round 3 67 MW E-to-D FTR bid awarded in Round 4 A 289 MW $ MW 185 MW 70 MW A-to-D FTR bid awarded in Round 4 Bus A LMP 174 MW B $ MW 361.6MW C 65 MW 111.5MW $ MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded Round MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round MW E-to-C FTR offer awarded in Round MW C-to-D FTR self schedule awarded in Round 4 195

196 Round 4 - FTRs Awarded Round 4 FTR Path MW Bid/Offer Price MWs Cleared Clearing Price Revenue LSE B LSE C No Bid No Bid LSE D E-to-D MW $500.00/MW 67.0 MW $ /MW $ 33, LSE D C-to-D 12.5 MW Price Taker 12.5 MW $ /MW $ 2, Alta A-to-D 70.0 MW $500.00/MW 70.0 MW $ /MW $ 26, Round 4 Total Auction Revenue = $62,

197 Round 4 Calculate ARR Target Allocation Revenues are distributed to ARR holders in proportion to (but not to exceed) the economic value of the ARRs which is determined by following equation: ARR Target Allocation = (ARR MW ) * (LMP ARR Sink - LMP ARR Source ) (# of rounds) Round 4 Total Auction Revenue = $62, Round 4 Total Target Allocation =????????? 197

198 Round 4 - Target Allocation Round 4 ARR Holder ARR MW ARR Sink ARR Source ARR MW # of rounds LMP Sink LMP Source ARR Target Allocation LSE B 200 Bus B Bus D 200/4 $ $ $ 11, LSE B 200 Bus B Bus C 200/4 $ $ $ 3, LSE C 350 Bus C Bus E 350/4 $ $ 0.00 $ 29, LSE D 300 Bus D Bus E 300/4 $ $ 0.00 $ 37, LSE D 50 Bus D Bus C 50/4 $ $ $ 2, Alta 70 Bus D Bus A 70/4 $ $ $ 6, Round 4 Total Target Allocation = $ 61,

199 Round 4 Summary Results Round 4 Total Auction Revenue = $62, >= Round 4 Total Target Allocation = $61, Round 4 Auction revenues are enough to satisfy Total ARR Target Allocations therefore ARR Credits = ARR Target Allocations Round 4 Total ARR Credits = $61, Round 4 Total Excess = $ 1,

200 Round 4 - Auction Payments Round 4 Market Participant FTR Auction Payment ARR Credits Auction Payment - ARR Credit (1) LSE B $ $ 14, $ 14, LSE C $ 0.00 $ 29, $ 29, LSE D $ 35, $ 39, $ 4, Alta $ 26, $ 6, $ 20, TOTAL $62, $61, $1, (1) Positive values indicate payment net to PJM 200

201 Annual FTR Auction Results Market Participant FTR ARR FTR Auction Payment ARR Credits Auction Payment - ARR Credit (1) LSE B 0 MW 0 MW 200 MW from D to B 200 MW from C to B $ 0.00 $ $ 22, $ 6, $ 22, $ 6, LSE C 300 MW from E to C 350 MW from E to C $ 27, $ 58, $ 30, LSE D 228.8MW from E-to-D 50 MW from C-to-D 300 MW from E-to-D 50 MW from C-to-D $ 65, $ 4, $ 74, $ 4, $ 9, $ 0.00 Alta 70 MW from A-to-D 70 MW from A-to-D $ 26, $ 13, $ 13, TOTAL $124, $122, $ 2, (1) Positive values indicate payment net to PJM 201

202 Annual FTR Auction Settlement Market Participant FTR Auction Payment ARR Credits Annual Auction Payment -ARR Credit (1) LSE B $ $ 28, $ 28, LSE C $ 27, $ 58, $ 30, LSE D $ 70, $ 79, $ 9, Alta $ 26, $ 13, $ 13, TOTAL $124, $122, $ 2, (1) Positive values indicate payment net to PJM 202

203 Annual FTR Auction Settlement (cont) Round FTR Auction Revenue ARR Target Allocation Surplus/ Deficiency Round 1 $ 18, $ 18, $ Round 2 $ 18, $ 18, $ Round 3 $ 24, $ 24, $ Round 4 $ 62, $ 61, $ 1, TOTAL $124, $122, $ 2,

204 Annual FTR Auction Settlements (cont.) Total Auction Revenues = $124, Total ARR Credits = $122, Total Excess = $ 2, Excess revenue from the annual auction is used to fund any shortfall in FTR Target Allocations ARR credits prorated proportionately if there are insufficient annual auction revenues to cover all ARR credits ARR deficiencies may be funded from Long-Term and Monthly Auction revenues and annual Excess Congestion Charges 204

205 Annual Auction Example - Summary FTR Auction revenues are sufficient to cover total ARR Target Allocations because all ARRs were simultaneously feasible FTR Auction revenues exceed total ARR Target Allocation because allocated ARRs did not fully utilize the transmission system 25% of system capability auctioned in each round LSE D self-schedules 50 MW C-to-D FTR in Round MW C-to-D FTR clears in each round and FTR payments equal ARR credits for this FTR 205

206 Annual Auction Summary (cont.) ARRs can be a liability (see LSE B ARR Credits) FTRs awarded in one round are modeled as fixed injections in the subsequent rounds FTRs awarded in one round can be offered for sale in subsequent rounds (LSE C sells E-to-C FTR Round 3) Alta receives 70 MW A-to-D FTR in Round 4 when clearing prices are highest. Alta s 70 MW A-to-D ARR credit does not completely offset Alta s payment for the FTR. 206

207 Appendix A: FTR Auction Clearing Mechanism PJM

208 Determining Winning Quotes Maximize bid-based value of FTR Auction Winning bids and offers are simultaneously feasible with prior committed FTRs 208

209 Determining Winning Quotes Download data from FTR market user database Solve linear program problem Check simultaneous feasibility of FTR auction solution Repeat Steps 2 & 3 Upload results to FTR market user interface 209

210 Step 1: Download Data from Database Uncompensated Parallel Flow Injections Transmission Outages Existing FTRs Facility Ratings FTR Quotes (Buy or Sell) PJM Network Model List of Contingencies Aggregate Price Definitions Optimization Engine 210

211 Step 2: Solve Linear Program Problem Objective: Determine highest valued combination of FTRs to be awarded in auction Calculate clearing prices differences in LMP at sink and source of FTR 211

212 Step 3: Check Simultaneous Feasibility Goal: Ensure that there are sufficient revenues for transmission congestion charges to satisfy all FTRs for the auction under expected conditions subject to transmission facility rating limits subject to transmission interface rating limits first contingency criteria 212

213 Step 5: Post FTR Auction Results Uncompensated Parallel Flow Injections Transmission Outage Schedules Existing FTRs Facility Ratings FTR Quotes (Buy or Sell) PJM Network Model List of Contingencies Aggregate Price Definitions FTR Auction Software FTRs Awarded in Auction FTRs Sold in Auction Nodal Prices Aggregate Prices Binding Constraints 213

214 Appendix A FTR Auction Clearing Mechanism Example PJM

215 The clearing mechanism of the FTR Auctions will maximize the quotebased value of the set of simultaneous feasible FTRs awarded in the auction, or each round of the auction The clearing prices will be calculated for all FTR Obligations at all buses, regardless of whether they are bought or sold in the auction. The clearing prices will be calculated for FTR Options for all valid FTR Option paths, regardless of whether they are bought or sold in the auction. FTR Auction Example Case 215

216 Firm Transmission & FTRs Market Participant Firm Network Firm Point-to Point FTR LSE B Peak Load 400 MW from 400 MW Brighton to LSE B LSE C Peak Load 150 MW from 350 MW Solitude to LSE C 200 MW from Brighton to LSE C LSE D Peak Load 220 MW from 350 MW Solitude to LSE D 130 MW from Sundance to LSE D Alta 70 MW 70 MW from A to D 216

217 Simultaneous Feasibility Test Ensures all subscribed transmission entitlements are within the capability of the system Ensures that the energy market will be revenue adequate Summary of Generation and Load in SFT LSE B LSE C LSE D Brighton Solitude Sundance Alta Generation 600 MW 370 MW 130 MW 70 MW Load 400 MW 350 MW 420 MW 217

218 Simultaneous Feasibility Test 130 MW from D to D Under the Limit! Brighton 600 MW E 400 MW from E to B 200 MW from E to C Alta 70 MW from A to D MW A 230 Park City 240 MW Thermal Limit 400 MW 350 MW B C D 370 MW 130 MW 420 MW 87 Sundance Solitude 220 MW from C to D 150 MW from C to C 218

219 PJM Auction Opens! 219

220 Auction Quotes FTR Buy Bids $5/MW Bid for 40 MW A-to-D FTR $4/MW Bid for 10 MW E-to-B FTR $4/MW Bid for 10 MW A-to-D FTR $4/MW Bid for 10 MW E-to-C FTR FTR Sell Offers $2/MW Sell Offer for 10 MW E-to-C FTR $6/MW Sell Offer for 10 MW A-to-D FTR NOTE: ALL BIDS IN THIS EXAMPLE ARE FOR FTR OBLIGATIONS 220

221 PJM Auction Closes! 221

222 Power Flows All Quotes Modeled E 10 MW 20 MW 248 MW 240 MW Thermal Limit 166 MW D 10 MW $6/MW Sell Offer for 10 MW A-to-D 50 MW FTR $4/MW Buy Bid for 10 MW E-to-B FTR $4/MW Buy Bid for 10 MW E-to-C FTR A $5/MW Buy Bid for 40 MW A-to-D FTR $4/MW Buy Bid for 10 MW A-to-D FTR 50 MW 362 MW 307 MW 103 MW 10 MW 10 MW 10 MW B C 83 MW 10 MW $2/MW Sell Offer for 10 MW E-to-C FTR 222

223 Selecting Winning Quotes (I) Path Buy Quotes MW Quote Quote Price Sensitivity Cost Effectiveness Sensitivity - portion of FTR that flows on Line E-D Cost Effectiveness - ratio of price to sensitivity Effect on Line E-D - MW times Sensitivity Effect on E-D Capability E-to-B 10 $ $ A-to-D 40 $ $ E-to-C 10 $ $ A-to-D 10 $ $ Sell Quotes E-to-C 10 $ $ A-to-D 10 $

224 Selecting Winning Quotes (II) Award bids by selecting from highest to lowest cost effectiveness, until all Line E-D capability is utilized. Compare sell offer cost effectiveness ratios (sorted highest to lowest) to cost of last marginal bid If cost effectiveness of sell offer is favorable to marginal bid cost effectiveness, sell offer is awarded. Additional bids are awarded to consume the FTR capability made available during Step 2. Repeat Steps 1, 2, and 3 until all capability is utilized. 224

225 What is the Commodity? Quote Buy 10 MW from Line E-B Buy 40 MW from Line A-D Sell 10 MW from Line E-C Buy 40 MW from Line A-D (20 MW remaining) Effect on Line E-D Remaining Capability on Line E-D Portion of Quote Awarded MW 10 MW buy (10 MW buy quote) MW 7.4/ = 20 MW buy (40 MW buy quote) MW 10 MW sell (10 MW sell quote) MW 3.2/ = 8 MW buy 8 MW + 20 MW = 28 MW buy (40 MW buy quote) 225

226 Clearing Price Calculation Source Sink Portion of FTR that flows on Line E-D Clearing Price Calculation A D A D is the Marginal FTR Path A B $5.00 * / = $2.05 A C $5.00 * / = $2.83 A E $5.00 * / = -$1.52 E D $5.00 * / = $6.52 E C $5.00 * / = $4.35 E B $5.00 * / = $3.57 B C $5.00 * / = $0.79 B D $5.00 * / = $2.95 C D $5.00 * / = $

227 Auction Results FTR Buy Bids $5/MW Bid for 40 MW A-to-D FTR $4/MW Bid for 10 MW E-to-B FTR $4/MW Bid for 10 MW A-to-D FTR $4/MW Bid for 10 MW E-to-C FTR FTR Sell Offers $2/MW Sell Offer for 10 MW E-to-C FTR $6/MW Sell Offer for 10 MW A-to-D FTR Quotes Cleared 28 $5.00/MW 10 $3.57/MW 0 MW 0 MW Quotes Cleared 10 $4.35/MW 0 MW FTR Auction Revenues (28 MW)($5.00/MW) +(10 MW)($3.57/MW) - (10 MW)($4.35/MW) = $

228 $0.0 E 10 MW 10 MW $1.519 A Auction Results Clearing Prices by Path 240 MW 28 MW 360 MW 240 MW Thermal Limit 299 MW 10 MW 159 MW B 111 MW C 81 MW 10 MW D $3.567 $4.354 Sink A B C D E Source A B C D E MW $

229 Congestion Prices Brighton 600 MW $10/MWh 600 MW Alta 110 MW $14/MWh E $15 $10.44 A 110 MW MW Constrained Day-Ahead Hour Park City 100 MW $15/MWh 240 MW Thermal Limit 300 MW 300 MW B $21.14 Marginal Generators C $ D 124 MW 300 MW $23.51 Sundance 200 MW $30/MWh Solitude 520 MW $30/MWh Total Congestion Charges =$9,

230 Pre-Auction Congestion Credit Target Allocations FTR Source Sink Target Congestion Congestion Allocation Price Price 400 MW from E to B $10.44 $21.14 $4, MW from E to C $10.44 $23.51 $2, MW from A to D $15.00 $30.00 $1, MW from C to D $23.51 $30.00 $1, MW from C to C $23.51 $23.51 $ MW from D to D $30.00 $30.00 $ 0.00 $9,

231 Post-Auction Congestion Credit Target Allocations FTR Source Congestion Price Sink Congestion Price Target Allocation 400 MW from E to B $10.44 $21.14 $4, MW from E to C $10.44 $23.51 $2, MW from A to D $15.00 $30.00 $1, MW from C to D $23.51 $30.00 $1, MW from C to C $23.51 $23.51 $ MW from D to D $30.00 $30.00 $ MW from A to D $15.00 $30.00 $ MW from E to B $10.44 $21.12 $ $9,

232 232

233 Appendix B: eftr - Market User Interfaces PJM

234 Portfolio Management 234

235 Messages 235

236 Reports 236

237 Quotes by Portfolio 237

238 Quotes by Participant 238

239 Market Results - Obligation Clearing Prices 239

240 Market Results - Option Prices 240

241 Market Results by Portfolio 241

242 Market Results by Participant 242

243 Market Results - Constraints 243

244 FTR Trading - Post FTRs 244

245 FTR Trading - Available FTRs 245

246 FTR Trading - Accepted FTRs 246

247 FTR Trading - Confirmed FTRs 247

248 FTR Position 248

249 FTR Credit Summary Total equals some of positive monthly values only 249

250 FTR Credit Detail Total for Cleared credit type is sum of positive and negative monthly cleared credit values. 250

251 ARR Requests - Stage 1 251

252 ARR Requests - Stage 1 252

253 ARR Requests - Stage 1 253

254 ARR Requests Stage 2 254

Residual Auction Revenue Rights Enhancement

Residual Auction Revenue Rights Enhancement Residual Auction Revenue Rights Enhancement Brian Chmielewski Sr. Analyst, Market Simulation Department Markets and Reliability Committee December 22, 2016 Solution Package Overview - Package A Proposed

More information

Residual Auction Revenue Rights

Residual Auction Revenue Rights Residual Auction Revenue Rights Brian Chmielewski Sr. Analyst, Market Simulation Department Market Implementation Committee November 2, 2016 Overview Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) prorated in Stage 1B

More information

Residual Auction Revenue Rights

Residual Auction Revenue Rights Residual Auction Revenue Rights Brian Chmielewski Sr. Analyst, Market Simulation Department Markets and Reliability Committee November 17, 2016 Overview Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) prorated in Stage

More information

Market Settlements Auction Revenue Rights & Financial Transmission Rights. March 2011 Henry Chu

Market Settlements Auction Revenue Rights & Financial Transmission Rights. March 2011 Henry Chu Market Settlements Auction Revenue Rights & Financial Transmission Rights March 2011 Henry Chu Market Settlement Training Series Market Settlements Training Modules: Overview O101 (Feb. 2011) ARR/FTR AF201

More information

Published: December 15, 2017 Revised: December 15, 2017

Published: December 15, 2017 Revised: December 15, 2017 Market Participant Guide: SPP 2018 Congestion Hedging Published: December 15, 2017 Revised: December 15, 2017 Revision History Chart Version Revised By Description of Modifications Revision Date 1.0 Congestion

More information

Published: December 15, 2016 Revised: December 15, 2016

Published: December 15, 2016 Revised: December 15, 2016 Market Participant Guide: SPP 2017 Congestion Hedging Published: December 15, 2016 Revised: December 15, 2016 Revision History Chart Version Revised By Description of Modifications Revision Date 1.0 Congestion

More information

Midwest ISO Overview - ATC Customer Meeting. February 26, 2009

Midwest ISO Overview - ATC Customer Meeting. February 26, 2009 Midwest ISO Overview - ATC Customer Meeting February 26, 2009 Agenda Overview January 2009 Dashboard Module E RAR Timeline Questions 2 Overview January was characterized by seasonal cold temperatures,

More information

Data Miner 2 Release Notes Release 18.09

Data Miner 2 Release Notes Release 18.09 Data Miner 2 Release Notes Release 18.09 Release Date: September 24, 2018 New Features: 1. New feeds These feeds will be available from September 25, 2018 onwards Enhancements: Real Time Temperature Sets

More information

Table of Contents. Preface. SECTION 1 Introduction 1. SECTION 3 Operating Reserve 65. SECTION 2 Energy Market 17

Table of Contents. Preface. SECTION 1 Introduction 1. SECTION 3 Operating Reserve 65. SECTION 2 Energy Market 17 Table of Contents Table of Contents Preface SECTION 1 Introduction 1 Q3 2012 In Review 1 PJM Market Background 2 Conclusions 3 Role of MMU 6 Reporting 7 Monitoring 7 Market Design 8 Recommendations 8 Highlights

More information

Southwest Power Pool Transmission Congestion Rights TCR System Market Participant User Manual. Version 3.4 Last Updated: February 2015

Southwest Power Pool Transmission Congestion Rights TCR System Market Participant User Manual. Version 3.4 Last Updated: February 2015 Southwest Power Pool Transmission Congestion Rights TCR System Market Participant User Manual Version 3.4 Last Updated: February 2015 Copyright 2012-2015 Nexant, Inc. All rights reserved. Nexant, Inc.

More information

Southwest Power Pool Transmission Congestion Rights TCR System Market Participant User Manual. Version 2.0 Last Updated: November 2012

Southwest Power Pool Transmission Congestion Rights TCR System Market Participant User Manual. Version 2.0 Last Updated: November 2012 Southwest Power Pool Transmission Congestion Rights TCR System Market Participant User Manual Version 2.0 Last Updated: November 2012 Copyright 2012 Nexant, Inc. All rights reserved. Nexant, Inc. P a g

More information

I. Tariff language for Transmission Losses Applied to Monthly Reported Network Loads: (for tariff)

I. Tariff language for Transmission Losses Applied to Monthly Reported Network Loads: (for tariff) I. Tariff language for Transmission Losses Applied to Monthly Reported Network Loads: (for tariff) * MISO will add the underlined text provided by the Owners Committee to Section 34.2 of the Tariff with

More information

NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 3(2018)

NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 3(2018) NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 3(2018) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

More information

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff Table of Contents 17. Transmission Ownership Rights (TORs)... 2 17.1 TRTC Instructions... 2 17.1.1 Responsibility to Create TRTC Instructions... 2 17.1.2 TOR Scheduling Coordinator Responsibilities...

More information

Guide 8. TCC Automated Market System User s Guide

Guide 8. TCC Automated Market System User s Guide Guide 8 TCC Automated Market System User s Guide Issued: December, 2017 Version: 5.0 Effective Date: 12/13/2017 Prepared By: Planning and TCC Products, Market Structures New York Independent System Operator

More information

Draft Proposal for the Allocation of Congestion Revenue Rights to Merchant Transmission

Draft Proposal for the Allocation of Congestion Revenue Rights to Merchant Transmission The following White Paper proposes a draft methodology for determining the incremental amount of transfer capability that would be the basis for the quantity of Merchant Transmission CRRs to be allocated

More information

European Developments

European Developments European Developments Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. Transmission Workgroup

More information

NETWORK INTEGRATION TRANSMISSION SERVICE. Preamble

NETWORK INTEGRATION TRANSMISSION SERVICE. Preamble Seventh Revised Volume No. 5 (MT) Original Sheet No. 53 III. NETWORK INTEGRATION TRANSMISSION SERVICE Preamble The Transmission Provider will provide Network Integration Transmission Service pursuant to

More information

Business Practice. 1.2 Resources must meet certain FERC specified requirements in order to qualify as Designated Network Resources.

Business Practice. 1.2 Resources must meet certain FERC specified requirements in order to qualify as Designated Network Resources. Business Practice 1. General 1.1 Primary Network Service is a long-term firm service and should only be used by Network Customers when reserving and scheduling delivery of energy from Designated Network

More information

Balancing Programme 1

Balancing Programme 1 Balancing Programme 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS... 22 DISCLAIMER... 33 1 INTRODUCTION... 44 2 BALANCING REGIME WITHIN THE BELUX AREA... 55 2.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF MARKET-BASED BALANCING... 55 2.2 MARKET-BASED

More information

Frequently Asked Questions Real-Time Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee

Frequently Asked Questions Real-Time Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee Frequently Asked Questions Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee What is Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee (RSG)? Midwest ISO has the responsibility to ensure that adequate capacity is available and committed to meet

More information

Open Access Transmission Tariff of Southern Companies

Open Access Transmission Tariff of Southern Companies Open Access Transmission Tariff of Southern Companies Procedures for Reserving Transmission Capacity for Future Load Growth, Designating/Undesignating Network Resources, and Arranging for Other Related

More information

Specific topics covered in this brief include:

Specific topics covered in this brief include: April 2008 Summary Welcome to the Fifteenth National Wind Coordinating Collaborative (NWCC) Transmission Update! Kevin Porter of Exeter Associates, Inc. led the April 28, 2008, Transmission Update conference

More information

Market Participant User Guide ISO Reliability Requirements Application (IRR UI)

Market Participant User Guide ISO Reliability Requirements Application (IRR UI) Market Participant User Guide ISO Reliability Requirements Application (IRR UI) Version 1 Last Revised: November 21, 2011 ISO Public 1 of 84 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 5 1.1 Resource Adequacy

More information

Markets Gateway Roadmap

Markets Gateway Roadmap Markets Gateway Roadmap As of April 17, 2018 www.pjm.com Background Markets Gateway allows users to submit information and obtain data needed to conduct business in the Day-Ahead, Regulation and Synchronized

More information

REDIRECT OF A TRANSMISSION RESERVATION

REDIRECT OF A TRANSMISSION RESERVATION REDIRECT OF A TRANSMISSION RESERVATION In this section: Overview Redirect on a Firm Basis Redirect on a Non-Firm Basis Pricing Validation for Redirects Redirect of a Resale 1.0 OVERVIEW Pursuant to Section

More information

FNM Expansion Training Webinar

FNM Expansion Training Webinar FNM Expansion Training Webinar Cynthia Hinman Lead Client Trainer August 11, 2014 The information contained in these materials is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal or

More information

Strategic Reserve in Belgium Design and functioning

Strategic Reserve in Belgium Design and functioning Strategic Reserve in Belgium Design and functioning Andreas Tirez Director Technical functioning of the markets IAEE March 9, 2015 Paris 1 Strategic Reserve (SR) Generation capacity that is being closed,

More information

1Q17 RESULTS M AY / 2017

1Q17 RESULTS M AY / 2017 RESULTS M AY / 2017 Positivo Tecnologia recorded a net revenue of R$453.5 million in, an increase of 20.7% Continuous progress in the diversification of the business, with mobile phones reaching 32.6%

More information

Revised Pilot Framework Guideline on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms E10-GWG December 2010

Revised Pilot Framework Guideline on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms E10-GWG December 2010 Revised Pilot Framework Guideline on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms E10-GWG-71-03 7 December 2010 Council of European Energy Regulators ASBL 28 rue le Titien, 1000 Bruxelles Arrondissement judiciaire de

More information

Generation Interconnection Process. NEMSTF Education Session 1 January 19, 2012

Generation Interconnection Process. NEMSTF Education Session 1 January 19, 2012 Generation Interconnection Process NEMSTF Education Session 1 January 19, 2012 www.pjm.com Follows FERC Pro Forma Process Queues are open for a 3 month period Spreads Workload Out Over Year Generation,

More information

Agreements and Queue Management

Agreements and Queue Management Agreements and Queue Management Infrastructure Contracts and Management Joanne Bradley, Queue Management Shoukat Ansari, Contract Negotiation PJ Topping, Regulatory Contracts February 27, 2019 Interconnection

More information

RELIABILITY AS A SERVICE FOR BUSINESS. by MidEnterprises, LLC

RELIABILITY AS A SERVICE FOR BUSINESS. by MidEnterprises, LLC RELIABILITY AS A SERVICE FOR BUSINESS by MidEnterprises, LLC THE OPPORTUNITY Less than 30% of commercial facilities have a reliable back-up power supply Only10-15% of those having existing installations

More information

Auction Calendar 2017/2018 for Capacity Allocation Mechanism Network Code

Auction Calendar 2017/2018 for Capacity Allocation Mechanism Network Code CAP682-16 Version date: October 07 2016 Calendar 2017/2018 for Capacity Allocation Mechanism Network Code EXPLANATORY NOTE/DISCLAIMER The Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in Gas Transmission

More information

Resource Adequacy Pre-Market Simulation Training Workshop

Resource Adequacy Pre-Market Simulation Training Workshop Resource Adequacy Pre-Market Simulation Training Workshop Focusing on the following initiatives: Reliability Services Initiative (RSI) Capacity Procurement Mechanism (CPM) Replacement October 21, 2015

More information

Appendix 6: Description of an example methodology and software for FTR grid design and determining FTR rentals

Appendix 6: Description of an example methodology and software for FTR grid design and determining FTR rentals Appendix 6: Description of an example methodology and software for FTR grid design and determining FTR rentals 1. Introduction The Authority has developed prototype software applications for the FTR manager

More information

Nigerian Telecommunications (Services) Sector Report Q2 2016

Nigerian Telecommunications (Services) Sector Report Q2 2016 Nigerian Telecommunications (Services) Sector Report Q2 2016 01 SEPTEMBER 2016 Telecommunications Data The telecommunications data used in this report were obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics

More information

_ Dear Secretary Bose: The attached. Folsom, CA

_ Dear Secretary Bose: The attached. Folsom, CA California Independent System Operator June 29, 2012 The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: California Independent System

More information

MISO PJM Joint and Common Market Cross Border Transmission Planning

MISO PJM Joint and Common Market Cross Border Transmission Planning MISO PJM Joint and Common Market Cross Border Transmission Planning February 28, 2017 1 Agenda 2 Targeted Market Efficiency Projects 2-Year Coordinated System Plan Study FERC Order No. 1000 Interregional

More information

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending January 31, To FCC Contract Oversight Sub-Committee. February 11, 2019

Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending January 31, To FCC Contract Oversight Sub-Committee. February 11, 2019 Billing and Collection Agent Report For period ending January 31, 2019 To FCC Contract Oversight Sub-Committee February 11, 2019 Welch LLP - Chartered Professional Accountants 123 Slater Street, 3 rd floor,

More information

Feasibility Study on Load Flow and Short Circuit Project

Feasibility Study on Load Flow and Short Circuit Project Feasibility Study on Load Flow and Short Circuit Project 101813-01 Prepared by: Transmission Planning Department Cleco Corporation, Inc. 2180 St. Landry Hwy P.O. Box 70 St. Landry, LA 71367 Final November

More information

Regional Booking Platform User Manual To users with Network Users roles

Regional Booking Platform User Manual To users with Network Users roles Regional Booking Platform User Manual To users with Network Users roles 1 Table of Contents 1 Master data... 6 1.1 Users... 6 1.1.1 List of users... 6 1.1.2 Enter a new user (to your own organization)...

More information

Agreements and Queue Management

Agreements and Queue Management Agreements and Queue Management Infrastructure Contracts and Management Emilee Plouff, Contract Negotiation and Regulatory Contracts Joanne Bradley, Queue Management March 6, 2018 Interconnection Process

More information

This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective.

This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Development Steps Completed

More information

CIMA Certificate BA Interactive Timetable

CIMA Certificate BA Interactive Timetable CIMA Certificate BA Interactive Timetable 2018 Nottingham & Leicester Version 3.2 Information last updated 09/03/18 Please note: Information and dates in this timetable are subject to change. Introduction

More information

MISO PJM Joint and Common Market Cross Border Transmission Planning

MISO PJM Joint and Common Market Cross Border Transmission Planning MISO PJM Joint and Common Market Cross Border Transmission Planning May 30, 2018 1 Coordinated System Plan Study 2 Using information from the March 30 Annual Issues Review, the JRPC has decided to perform

More information

MISO-PJM Cross-Border Planning. February 19, 2014 MISO-PJM JCM

MISO-PJM Cross-Border Planning. February 19, 2014 MISO-PJM JCM MISO-PJM Cross-Border Planning February 19, 2014 MISO-PJM JCM Planning Issues at the Seam 2 Background JOA Historical and Projected Congestion Study - 2012 to 2014 Future Scenario based 80+ major project

More information

ARR Registration User Manual

ARR Registration User Manual ARR Registration User Manual Page 1 of 36 Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE... 4 2 SCOPE... 4 3 DEFINITIONS... 4 3.1 Timeline... 6 3.2 Overview of the ARR Registration Process... 7 4 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES...

More information

Business Practice. Non-Firm Transmission Service Request Processing

Business Practice. Non-Firm Transmission Service Request Processing Business Practice Non-Firm 1. General Policies 1.1 Transmission Service Reservation (TSR) priorities are established for Non-Firm pointto-point (PTP) transmission service in accordance with APS s Open

More information

Western Area Power Administration Right of First Refusal Business Practice

Western Area Power Administration Right of First Refusal Business Practice Western Area Power Administration Right of First Refusal Business Practice Transmission Service Request Processing and Offering Right of First Refusal: The processing of requests for transmission service

More information

SPP Recommendation FERC Electronic Quarterly Report Data Dictionary Version 1.1

SPP Recommendation FERC Electronic Quarterly Report Data Dictionary Version 1.1 SPP Recommendation FERC Electronic Quarterly Report Data Dictionary Version 1.1 March 21, 2017 1 FERC EQR Report Data Dictionary Contents Report Columns... 3 Product Codes Table... 9 Sample Report... Error!

More information

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Transition Plan Technical Conference #1

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Transition Plan Technical Conference #1 Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Transition Plan Technical Conference #1 May 5, 2010 1 Why Technical Conferences? Complex subject matter Venue for stakeholders to develop an awareness and understanding of the issues

More information

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 63159-E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 62810-E Schedule D-SDP Sheet 1 APPLICABILITY The Domestic Summer Discount

More information

Designation and Termination of Network Resources

Designation and Termination of Network Resources Transmission & Reliability Services Business Practice: Designation and Termination of Network Resources Posted: February 8, 2010 Effective: May 3, 2010 Revision No.: 5 1. Purpose The purpose of this business

More information

Spectrum Auction and the Case Study from Pakistan. Syed Ismail Shah, PhD Chairman, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority

Spectrum Auction and the Case Study from Pakistan. Syed Ismail Shah, PhD Chairman, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Spectrum Auction and the Case Study from Pakistan Syed Ismail Shah, PhD Chairman, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority E-mail: ismail@pta.gov.pk Overview of the Presentation Spectrum Auctions History of

More information

NorthWestern Energy (NWMT)

NorthWestern Energy (NWMT) NorthWestern Energy (NWMT) Open Access Transmission Tariff and OASIS Business Practices Effective 12/27/2007 These business practices apply to transmission service requests made after 10/4/2006. These

More information

Powerex EIM Implementation Informational Call. Mark Holman, Powerex Don Tretheway, California ISO October 3, 2017

Powerex EIM Implementation Informational Call. Mark Holman, Powerex Don Tretheway, California ISO October 3, 2017 Powerex EIM Implementation Informational Call Mark Holman, Powerex Don Tretheway, California ISO October 3, 2017 Agenda Time Topic Presenter 9:00 9:05 Introduction Kristina Osborne, ISO 9:05 10:05 Powerex

More information

Total Market Demand Wed Jul 26 Thu Jul 27 Fri Jul 28 Sat Jul 29 Sun Jul 30 Mon Jul 31 Tue Aug 01

Total Market Demand Wed Jul 26 Thu Jul 27 Fri Jul 28 Sat Jul 29 Sun Jul 30 Mon Jul 31 Tue Aug 01 MW July 26, 2017 - August 1, 2017 This report provides a summary of key market data from the IESO-administered markets. It is intended to provide a quick reference for all market stakeholders. It is composed

More information

Overview of DSASP; Telemetry/Communication Alternatives

Overview of DSASP; Telemetry/Communication Alternatives Overview of DSASP; Telemetry/Communication Alternatives The New York Independent System Operator Price Responsive Load Working Group May 12, 2010 Agenda Overview of DSASP Market Rules Current Communications/Telemetry

More information

The latest update of power market in Latvia

The latest update of power market in Latvia The latest update of power market in Latvia Ainārs Meņģelsons Public Utilities Commission of Latvia Director of Energy Department 21st Baltic Electricity Market Forum, Vilnius, May 3, 2016 Content Some

More information

Standard INT Dynamic Transfers

Standard INT Dynamic Transfers Standard INT-004-3.1 Dynamic Transfers A. Introduction 1. Title: Dynamic Transfers 2. Number: INT-004-3.1 3. Purpose: To ensure Dynamic Schedules and Pseudo-Ties are communicated and accounted for appropriately

More information

REPORT ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE QUALITY WINDSTREAM FLORIDA, INC.

REPORT ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE QUALITY WINDSTREAM FLORIDA, INC. REPORT ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE QUALITY For WINDSTREAM FLORIDA, INC. Alachua, Brooker, High Springs, Melrose, and Waldo s February 4 March 14, 2008 Division of Service, Safety & Consumer Assistance

More information

Nigerian Telecommunications Sector

Nigerian Telecommunications Sector Nigerian Telecommunications Sector SUMMARY REPORT: Q4 and full year 2015 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS 26th April 2016 Telecommunications Data The telecommunications data used in this report were obtained

More information

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 977 METERING PROTOCOL

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 977 METERING PROTOCOL ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 977 METERING PROTOCOL ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 978 METERING PROTOCOL Table of Contents MP 1 OBJECTIVES, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE MP 1.1 Objective

More information

VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC. Page 1. SECTION 13 - EXHIBIT M - Network-Based IP VPN SERVICE

VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC. Page 1. SECTION 13 - EXHIBIT M - Network-Based IP VPN SERVICE VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC. Page 1 Quote Number or CBS/CNE Tracking Number: 1) Description of Service. Internet Protocol-Virtual Private Network (IP VPN) Service (Service) is a packet-based advanced data

More information

RIGHTMOVE PRODUCT GUIDELINES New Homes. Core Membership means the basic Services to which You are entitled in return for your Core Membership Fee.

RIGHTMOVE PRODUCT GUIDELINES New Homes. Core Membership means the basic Services to which You are entitled in return for your Core Membership Fee. RIGHTMOVE PRODUCT GUIDELINES New Homes DEFINITIONS Core Membership means the basic Services to which You are entitled in return for your Core Membership Fee. Additional Products means the additional Services

More information

Standard INT Dynamic Transfers

Standard INT Dynamic Transfers A. Introduction 1. Title: Dynamic Transfers 2. Number: INT-004-3 3. Purpose: To ensure Dynamic Schedules and Pseudo-Ties are communicated and accounted for appropriately in congestion management procedures.

More information

Agreements & Queue Management

Agreements & Queue Management Agreements & Queue Management Resource Interconnection Fair February 24, 2016 Page 1 Interconnection Process Map You are here Page 2 Topics 1. Generator Interconnection Agreement (GIA) 2. Affected Systems

More information

ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND 2013 CARRIER REVENUE REPORT& SELF INVOICE INSTRUCTIONS

ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND 2013 CARRIER REVENUE REPORT& SELF INVOICE INSTRUCTIONS For questions or assistance with these instructions, contact Rural Telcom Solutions, LLC via Email at: ruraltelcom@ruraltelcom.com, or by mail at: ARHCF P.O. Box 608 Danville, AR 72833 I. Filing Requirements

More information

Technical Rule no. 4 rev. 02 PCE. Validation and technical adequacy verifications and Guarantee Coverage

Technical Rule no. 4 rev. 02 PCE. Validation and technical adequacy verifications and Guarantee Coverage Technical Rule no. 4 rev. 02 Page 1 of 9 Technical Rule no. 4 rev. 02 PCE (under article 4 of the Rules Governing the Forward Electricity Account Trading Platform PCE Rules) Title Validation and technical

More information

Quarter 3, 2007 (2007Q3) Generation Deliverability Assessment Study Plan

Quarter 3, 2007 (2007Q3) Generation Deliverability Assessment Study Plan Quarter 3, (Q3) Generation Deliverability Assessment Study Plan Background and Purpose of Study Phases I & II Generation and Import Deliverability Studies were completed that established the deliverability

More information

Energy Imbalance Market Technical Workshop. BAA Real-Time Congestion Balancing Account August 12, 2013

Energy Imbalance Market Technical Workshop. BAA Real-Time Congestion Balancing Account August 12, 2013 Energy Imbalance Technical Workshop BAA Real-Time Congestion Balancing Account August 12, 2013 Overview BAA Real-Time Congestion Balancing Account Real Time Convergence Bid Settlement Slide 2 BAA Real-Time

More information

Updated December 12, Chapter 10 Service Description IBM Cloud for Government

Updated December 12, Chapter 10 Service Description IBM Cloud for Government Updated December 12, 2018 Chapter 10 Service Description IBM Cloud for Government IBM Cloud for Government This Service Description describes IBM s Cloud for Government available to Clients under the Federal

More information

Maryland Soybeans: Historical Basis and Price Information

Maryland Soybeans: Historical Basis and Price Information Maryland Soybeans: Historical Basis and Price Information Fact Sheet 496 James C. Hanson Extension Specialist, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland Kevin McNew Adjunct

More information

Nigerian Telecommunications (Services) Sector Report Q3 2016

Nigerian Telecommunications (Services) Sector Report Q3 2016 Nigerian Telecommunications (Services) Sector Report Q3 2016 24 NOVEMBER 2016 Telecommunications Data The telecommunications data used in this report were obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics

More information

Program Guidelines. Program Outline

Program Guidelines. Program Outline Program Guidelines Program Outline The Level Up Marketing Assistance Program provides funds to be used toward marketing campaigns through approved vendors by individual producer-level agents contracted

More information

Introduction: Model Relationships Network Model Overview Example Commercial Model Overview Component Hierarchy & Definitions Example of Structure

Introduction: Model Relationships Network Model Overview Example Commercial Model Overview Component Hierarchy & Definitions Example of Structure 1 2 3 Introduction: Model Relationships Network Model Overview Example Commercial Model Overview Component Hierarchy & Definitions Example of Structure MISO Functions Served by the Network Model by the

More information

Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information Fact Sheet 495

Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information Fact Sheet 495 Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information Fact Sheet 495 James C. Hanson, Extension Specialist Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland Kevin McNew, Adjunct

More information

June 2012 First Data PCI RAPID COMPLY SM Solution

June 2012 First Data PCI RAPID COMPLY SM Solution June 2012 First Data PCI RAPID COMPLY SM Solution You don t have to be a security expert to be compliant. Developer: 06 Rev: 05/03/2012 V: 1.0 Agenda Research Background Product Overview Steps to becoming

More information

Network Integration Service

Network Integration Service Network Integration Service MPS PAG Meeting November 21, 2013 Network Service The Transmission Provider will provide firm transmission service over its Transmission System to the Network Customer for the

More information

Auction Calendar 2016/2017 for Capacity Allocation Mechanism Network Code

Auction Calendar 2016/2017 for Capacity Allocation Mechanism Network Code CAP633-15 Version date: January 14 2016 Calendar 2016/2017 for Capacity Allocation Mechanism Network Code EXPLANATORY NOTE/DISCLAIMER The Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in Gas Transmission

More information

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 728 METERING PROTOCOL Table of Contents MP 1 OBJECTIVES, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE

More information

Transmission Service Reference Manual. May 08, 2017

Transmission Service Reference Manual. May 08, 2017 Transmission Service Reference Manual May 08, 2017 Revision History Revision History Date or Version Number April 29, 2015 Version 1.0 May 08, 2017 Version 2.0 Author Shari Brown Julie Gerush Change Description

More information

802 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 19, NO. 2, MAY Role of Distribution Factors in Congestion Revenue Rights Applications

802 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 19, NO. 2, MAY Role of Distribution Factors in Congestion Revenue Rights Applications 802 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 19, NO. 2, MAY 2004 Role of Distribution Factors in Congestion Revenue Rights Applications Minghai Liu, Student Member, IEEE, and George Gross, Fellow, IEEE

More information

Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information Fact Sheet 495

Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information Fact Sheet 495 Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information Fact Sheet 495 Dale M. Johnson, Farm Management Specialist James C. Hanson, Professor and Chair Kevin McNew, Adjunct Professor, Founder and President

More information

An Introduction to Network Codes & The Links Between Codes

An Introduction to Network Codes & The Links Between Codes An Introduction to Network Codes & The Links Between Codes April 2014 About ENTSO-E 41 TSOs from 34 countries 532 million citizens served 828 GW generation 305 Thousand Km of transmission lines Ten-Year

More information

Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Resources (ESDER) Stakeholder Initiative. Revised Scope and Schedule

Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Resources (ESDER) Stakeholder Initiative. Revised Scope and Schedule Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Resources (ESDER) Stakeholder Initiative Revised Scope and Schedule June 25, 2015 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Background... 3 3 Stakeholder process...

More information

Coordinate Interchange

Coordinate Interchange Coordinate Interchange Purpose: The purpose of this standard is to define procedures for market participants to request the implementation of Interchange Transactions. Applicability: This Standard applies

More information

Coordinate Interchange

Coordinate Interchange Coordinate Interchange Purpose: The purpose of this standard is to define procedures for market participants to request the implementation of Interchange Transactions. Applicability: This Standard applies

More information

July 30, Q2 Quarterly Report on Progress in Processing Interconnection Requests; Docket No. ER

July 30, Q2 Quarterly Report on Progress in Processing Interconnection Requests; Docket No. ER California Independent System Operator Corporation The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 July 30, 2010 Re: Q2 Quarterly

More information

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE REGULATIONS, RATES, AND CHARGES Applying to the Provision of DSL For Customers of Wilson Telephone Company, Inc. This DSL Service Guide does not include Internet

More information

From: Laura Manz, Vice President of Market & Infrastructure Development

From: Laura Manz, Vice President of Market & Infrastructure Development California Independent System Operator Corporation Memorandum To: ISO Board of Governors From: Laura Manz, Vice President of Market & Infrastructure Development Date: May 8, 2009 Re: Decision for Conditional

More information

NFX MARKET DATA FEED INTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS. NFX Market Data Feed

NFX MARKET DATA FEED INTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS. NFX Market Data Feed NFX Market Data Feed Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 PURPOSE... 3 1.2 ARCHITECTURE... 3 2 SESSION CHARACTERISTICS... 4 2.1 REAL-TIME PRODUCTION DATA... 4 2.2 PRE-LAUNCH TEST DATA... 4 2.3 TRANSMISSION

More information

Implementation Date for Reporting Trade-for-Trade Extended Failed Trades

Implementation Date for Reporting Trade-for-Trade Extended Failed Trades Rules Notice Technical UMIR Please distribute internally to: Institutional Legal and Compliance Operations Trading Desk Contact: Kevin McCoy Director, Market Regulation Policy Telephone: 416.943.4659 Fax:

More information

The Insider s Guide To Transfers. John Sweeting - Senior Director, Registration Services Cathy Clements Transfer Services Manager

The Insider s Guide To Transfers. John Sweeting - Senior Director, Registration Services Cathy Clements Transfer Services Manager The Insider s Guide To Transfers John Sweeting - Senior Director, Registration Services Cathy Clements Transfer Services Manager Overview Transfer Basics M&A Transfer Procedure & Tips Specified Recipient

More information

Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information

Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information Maryland Corn: Historical Basis and Price Information The local basis, defined as the cash price minus futures price, reflects important information about regional supply and demand for a commodity. Corn

More information

Contingency Reserve Sharing; Ancillary Services Market. Presented to the JCM Joint Stakeholder Meeting

Contingency Reserve Sharing; Ancillary Services Market. Presented to the JCM Joint Stakeholder Meeting Contingency Reserve Sharing; Ancillary Services Market Presented to the JCM Joint Stakeholder Meeting 1 Agenda Products and Nature of Current Services Contingency Reserve Sharing Group (CRSG) Agreement

More information

Assessing Opportunities to Exploit Stranded Power

Assessing Opportunities to Exploit Stranded Power Assessing Opportunities to Exploit Stranded Power Andrew A. Chien *University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory w/ Fan Yang, Rich Wolski (UCSB), Victor Zavala, Kibaek Kim (Argonne) UCSB Institute

More information

Electricity Market Reform

Electricity Market Reform Electricity Market Reform Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. John Perkins, Feed

More information

Regulating and pricing network access

Regulating and pricing network access Regulating and pricing network access László Szabó ERRA Training 5-8 March, 2013, Budapest Lecture outline Network: an essential infrastructure Getting connected Pricing the use of existing electricity

More information