A multi-disciplinary approach to Urban CIP

Transcription

1 The European Commission s science and knowledge service Joint Research Centre A multi-disciplinary approach to Urban CIP George M. Karagiannis

2 The Joint Research Centre at a glance 3000 staff Almost 75% are scientists and researchers. Headquarters in Brussels and research facilities located in 5 Member States. 2

3 Outline European Reference Network on CIP Urban CIP Building safety Impact of natural hazards on technological systems 3

4 What is ERNCIP? A JRC-facilitated network of securityrelated experts volunteering to address issues of pre-standardization at EU-level towards fostering the development of innovative and competitive security solutions Tomas Bata Luzern Kassel Gdansk Trento NPL CERN ENISA Patras Bristol IACIE INRIA STUK VTT ENER CNCT MOVE JRC HOME GROW Academia BAM ENEA LNEC AEA CETAQUA Thales ICRA EU Inst. CEA DSTL Robert Koch ENCS Research Facilities TNO Ecoind ISO CEN/ CEN. EON PSE EDP ETSI IATA Portugal Belgium France Shell ECAC Raja RATP Operators Nether lands NIST Memb. states Cyprus Spain Finavia ACI GDF Suez EOS Mutix Industry Czech Hungary Poland Romania Denmark Greece Elster EDP Sweden IBM UK L3 ABB S:can Vituki Germany Austria Finland Thessaloniki Alliander Fraunhofer Switzerlands Honey well Morpho Rapiscan Smiths Aster Iconal Siemens APCO Cyber Security Center VCE 4

5 ERNCIP deliverables We have three main types of deliverables from ERNCIP: 1. Recommendations for standardisation and research activities 2. Recommendations in support of EU policy 3. Guidance to infrastructure operators on protective security Plus the ERNCIP Inventory: an online database of facilities in the EU with capabilities for testing security solutions 5

6 ERNCIP core activities 1. Develop and Operate the ERNCIP Inventory 135 experimental facilities from 24 Member States are registered in the ERNCIP Inventory 6

7 ERNCIP core activities 2. Facilitate Thematic Groups currently seven active 450+ experts from 200+ organisations in 18 Member States have participated in ERNCIP thematic groups 7

8 Thematic Groups Chemical & Biological Detection Chemical/Biological(CB) Risks to Drinking Water Detection of Indoor Airborne CB agents Weapons & Explosives Threats Detection of explosives and weapons at secure locations Resistance of structures against explosive effects Radiological & Nuclear Threats Radiological/Nuclear threats to critical infrastructure Physical Security Early Warning Zones (video and biometric technologies) Sponsors DG HOME B4 Innovation and Industry for Security, June 2017 to May 2019 DG HOME D2 Terrorism and Radicalisation, April 2017 to March 2019 DG CNECT, March 2017 to February 2018 Cybersecurity IACS components Cybersecurity Certification Framework 8

9 Impact of natural hazards on the power grid Earthquakes Damage caused by inertial loading and ground failure Heavy equipment and ceramics most affected Recovery driven by access and widespread damage. Recovery time ranges from a few hours to months (most commonly 1-4 days) Space weather Damage from geomagnetically-induced currents; potential for system-wide impact Transmission and generation equipment most vulnerable Recovery driven by delayed effects and potentially by system-wide impact Recovery time <24 hours if protective systems work; repairs may take months. Floods Moisture/dirt devastating to electrical equipment; explosive failures possible. Erosion and landslides cause foundation damage. Substations and transmission towers most vulnerable. Recovery driven by access and widespread damage. Recovery time ranges from <24 hours to 3 weeks; longer with hurricane damage Source: T&D World Magazine (2014) Source: Queensland Government (2017) 9

10 Resilience Recovery is progressive Earthquake Taiwan, 1999 Hurricane Sandy USA, 1999 Factors affecting resilience: Robustness of individual network components to external shocks Network interconnections increase resilience by providing alternative power supply routes Network configuration Capability to meet response-generated demands Availability of spare parts and equipment items 10

11 11 Climate change and critical infrastructure: floods

12 Natech Risk Assessment Natural hazard triggered technological accidents Simultaneous hazardous releases from multiple sources over wide areas Simultaneous response needs to cope with the natural and technological events Hazardous material releases hampering emergency response activities Greater physical, economic, and environmental damage due to cascading events JRC Rapid Natech Risk Assessment and Mapping System (RAPID-N) Integrated natural hazard impact and hazardous consequence assessment Rapid local and regional analysis with dynamic model building Useful for land use planning, emergency management, and early-warning purposes World-wide data availability (e.g. refineries, power plants) Publicly available at Models Plants Hazards Assessment 12

13 Database of European building stock Data from Eurostat Census Hub dwellings by period of construction total number of buildings / dwellings population dwellings in low/medium/high seismic vulnerability class reference peak ground acceleration (PGA) 13 The majority of buildings in Europe are reaching or have exceeded their service life

14 Seismic classification of EU building stock In seismic-prone regions, the majority of buildings were designed without provisions for earthquake resistance or with moderate-level seismic codes Vulnerable buildings may impact a large part of the population 14

15 Standards for long-term resilience of buildings The Eurocodes complete set of state-of-theart standards for the structural design of buildings and infrastructures prevent the creation of new and reduction of existing risks related to natural and manmade disasters Share of houses that collapsed in the 1995 Kobe earthquake, by year of construction (World Bank, Learning from Megadisasters) tool to Build Back Better through post-disaster recovery 15

16 Stay in touch EU Science Hub: ec.europa.eu/jrc Facebook: EU Science Hub - Joint Research Centre LinkedIn: Joint Research Centre YouTube: EU Science Hub 16

17 17 Thank you for your attention!