Network of Judicial Registers

Transcription

1 Network of Judicial Registers PL BG NL SK SI UK IT PT November, 28

2 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Activities and results of the project (February November 28) New partners: BG, NL partners with operative data exchange:,,,,, partners preparing the data exchange: BG, IT, NL, PL, PT, SI, SK, UK Coaching: : NL : BG, SI, UK [ ] : PT : PL, IT, SK [ ] observers: AT, RO, SE

3 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Activities and results of the project (February November 28) Improvement of common documentation considering especially experiences of new partners Preparation of implementing the table of sanctions and parameters of sanctions developed by the Judicial Workgroup of the project Brainstorming about rules of a common Change Management suitable and practicable for 14 or more project partners Support to the EU Commission with respect to the development of the reference implementation to be connected to Contributing experience to the ECRIS discussion

4 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: Requests sent by partners in Σ: number of requests sent month-year

5 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: - Requests (January 28 - September 28),3% 43,4% 44,3% 5,7% 6,2%,1%

6 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: Notifications sent by partners in Σ: number of notifications sent month-year

7 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: - Notifications (January 28 - September 28) 15,4% 1,8% 38,7% 12,9% 21,9%,4%

8 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Special topic: meets ECRIS Compatibility between and existing common reference table of categories and subcategories of offences new ECRIS table of offences Compatibility between and existing new common reference table of categories, subcategories and parameters of decisions (sanctions) new ECRIS tables of sanctions and parameters of sanctions Brainstorming about inclusion of new ECRIS table of parameters of offences in data exchang

9 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Special topic: Reference Implementation What can/should the reference implementation be used as? (Or not)? Stand-alone application (?) (Manual input and output ) Interface between own register application and data exchange (?) (Automatic input and output ) (?) How can the reference implementation be integrated in the existing data exchange and its further development? Test procedures (?) Responsibilities for decisions touching further development (?) Change management rules and their consequences (?)

10 BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Special topic: Reference Implementation Who will be responsible for the maintenance and the further development of the reference implementation? Decisions about new releases of the reference implementation (?) Financing of normal maintenance of the reference implementation (?) Regular technical support for users of the reference implementation (?) Roll-out of new releases of the reference implementation (?) Maintenance of user-specific features (interfaces, etc.) (?) Financing of agreed changes of the reference implementation (?) Responsibilities and financing in cases of agreed changes of the data structure definitions and the common reference tables (?) Dependency on a special software development company (?) Dependency on special systems archtictures, hardware plattforms etc. (?) (?)

11 Network of Judicial Registers PL BG NL SK SI UK IT PT November, 28