LIBRARY HOMEPAGE PROTOTYPE USABILITY TEST REPORT. Submitted by Dana M. Smith Usability GRA, Library Systems Office

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "LIBRARY HOMEPAGE PROTOTYPE USABILITY TEST REPORT. Submitted by Dana M. Smith Usability GRA, Library Systems Office"

Transcription

1 LIBRARY HOMEPAGE PROTOTYPE USABILITY TEST REPORT Submitted by Dana M. Smith Usability GRA, Library Systems Office

2 CONTACT INFORMATION: For more information about this report, please contact: Dana Smith Usability GRA, Library Systems Office Georgia State University Library Doug Goans Web Development Librarian Georgia State University Library 100 Decatur Street, SE Library North Office 529 Atlanta, GA CHANGE HISTORY: Issue Date Description of Changes Submission of initial report to Doug Goans Final Report Addition of Appendix Material 5/17/2004 2

3 Contents Abstract... 4 Introduction... 5 Background & Premise... 5 Study Objectives... 7 Usability Test Method... 8 Test Results & Analysis Introduction Pre-Test Questionnaire (Demographics) Usability Questionnaire Task Analysis Post Test Interview Conclusions Design Recommendations Appendix A. Homepage Prototype Design Process Appendix B. Usability Test Instruments Appendix C. Test Facilitator Documents /17/2004 3

4 Abstract This document details the GSU Library Homepage Prototype Usability Testing conducted during April 7 th - 15 th Fifteen (15) GSU students (also library website users) participated in usability test sessions held to gather reaction regarding a new Library Homepage Design. This new design and corresponding functional web prototype were developed based on the results from the focus group study held by the Library Systems Office last semester. A graphic of the prototype design is located in Appendix A. The usability test results in this report outline basic demographic information gathered using a presession questionnaire, answers recorded from a questionnaire related to a graphic display version of the new design, and task analysis using the functional web prototype. Responses from a post-test interview were also documented by the test facilitators. Test Facilator observations were recorded as notes during the sessions. All sessions were video recorded for later review by the principal investigator. Copies of the test instruments are located in Appendix B; completed test documentation is located in Appendix D. The conclusions drawn from analysis of the usability test results support the following: The users had no problem identifying the preferred homepage links for 3 out of 10 questions. Users had a serious identification problem for navigation terms associated with finding a subject librarian although they made a reasonable connection with the choices offered. The other issues are mostly likely due to unfamiliarity with online services and users ignorance. Users had no problem performing 2 out of 5 tasks given; 2 of the remaining tasks involve third party applications used by the library and out of our control. Future design recommendations for new GSU Library homepage based on the test results include: Better terminology regarding Ask a Librarian, Research Guides, and Contact Us and the related information behind these links. An online tutorial to supplement the in-class tutorial offered by GSU Libraries, specifically tailored to online users and corresponding online library services. 5/17/2004 4

5 Introduction Background & Premise The GSU Library Web Development Team conducted a focus group study at GSU Library on Friday, December 5 th, Twenty-two (22) library website users participated across three (3) focus group sessions to discuss the current homepage design (refer to Figure 2) and four (4) new prototype designs. Results and suggestions from the focus group study included: Offer fewer text link choices. Users struggled to make choices (based on importance or value) because of no visual hierarchy on the home page. The graphics featured in Figure 1 are highly recognized and valued by GSU students and faculty These could possibly be altered (design and color wise), but should NOT BE REMOVED from the home page for the new design. Figure 1: GSU Library Homepage Favored Icons GSU library website users are drawn to graphics and color for navigation and distinguishing between topic sections on pages. GSU library website users are a captive audience (it is necessary for classes and research), but would appreciate more user-centered (student) features less News & events specific; more relevant information like hours of operation should be readily apparent. A One-Sentence Tagline should explain briefly the mission of GSU Library, and tell users what they ll gain from visiting the site. This would be more welcoming and indicative of a home page design. Simple illustrations, boxes, and colors are most helpful; excessive use of underlines is not. Also, users often dismiss elaborate graphics as ads (such SFX@GSU). All participants appreciated the use of graphics and pictures, as long as it was enhancing or reinforcing a message. Overall, the focus group revealed that GSU library website users are enthusiastic and receptive about a new design, as long as it is user-friendly and enhances their ability to get their work done in a timely fashion. Their design preferences lean toward a more sophisticated look that is easy to navigate, visually appealing, and quick to download (regardless of connection speed). These recommendations were used to develop a new homepage design for the GSU Library Website Homepage. This new proposed homepage design is featured in Figure 3: 5/17/2004 5

6 Figure 2: Current GSU Library Homepage Figure 3: Homepage Design Prototype 5/17/2004 6

7 Study Objectives The GSU Library Homepage Prototype Usability Study seeks to discover user reaction regarding the new design and identify areas (if any) for improvement. Usability is the measure of the quality of a user's experience when interacting with a product or system whether a Web site, a software application, mobile technology, or any user-operated device. Usability is a combination of factors that affect the user's experience with the product or system, including *: Ease of Learning: How fast can a user who has never seen the user interface before learn it sufficiently well to accomplish basic tasks? Efficiency of Use: Once an experienced user has learned to use the system, how fast can he or she accomplish tasks? Memorability: If a user has used the system before, can he or she remember enough to use it effectively the next time or does the user have to start over again learning everything? Error Frequency & Severity: How often do users make errors while using the system, how serious are these errors, and how do users recover from these errors? Subjective Satisfaction: How much does the user like using the system? * Source: With regard to the GSU Library Homepage, our usability goals are to increase user productivity and increase the quality of website visits by reducing (or eliminating) user frustration and confusion. The homepage serves as a portal of crucial tools for our faculty, staff, and student body, and must produce a trustworthy and reliable online experience. For these reasons, it is important to determine if this new proposed homepage design is serving audience needs and providing a pleasant user experience before implementation of the design can take place. 5/17/2004 7

8 Usability Test Method Two common web usability inquiry methods were combined for our study: cognitive walkthrough and task analysis. A cognitive walkthrough involves observing and listening to user s behaviors while they execute familiar tasks and having an informal dialogue regarding the web interface tested (for a measure of qualitative results). A task analysis involves scripted scenarios (designed by principal investigator) for users to complete in order to access ease or difficulty. Both usability test methods should be conducted with a minimum of *12-15 participants (maximum of 20) for meaningful test results. *Source: It is important prior to usability testing to identify the most popular features/sections of the webpage in question. With regard to the GSU Library Homepage, the following areas of interest were targeted for testing: Finding general library information such as: o Map/Directions to GSU Library o Library hours of operation o Phone Number and location of important departments (i.e., Circulation Desk) o Contact information and location of subject reference librarians Utilizing library services online such as: o Finding articles, books and other reference materials online o examine if a book is available or checked out o Accessing Course Reserve materials o Online Interlibrary Loan requests We also wanted to capture user attitudes regarding design considerations specific to web interfaces. In particular, we asked users to rate the following webpage attributes from least important to most important with regard to websites in general and specifically with reference to the new GSU Library homepage design: Appealing color & layout design Easy to navigate & understand Useful information & content Meaningful navigation links; correspond to linked information Number of navigation options available Easy to read text/font size Quality of graphics and/or photos Easy access to the features you use most often 5/17/2004 8

9 GSU IRB approval for the Library Usability Test Study was granted in March The usability test sessions were scheduled to take place in the Center for Teaching & Learning, Library South. The sessions were offered at the following days and times, with testing scheduled on the hour: Wed, April 7 th through Fri, April 9 th 9:00am-5:00pm Saturday, April 10 th 10:00am-3:00pm Monday, April 12 th through Thursday April 15 th 9:00am-5:00pm A target of 20 students for recruitment was set. Each participant would receive candy/snacks and a $5 GSU Panthercard applied credit for their time. Participants were recruited from the focus group recruit list (those who indicated interest in the focus group, but did not participate), notices on the library homepage, signs placed in the library, and word of mouth. Upon arriving to the test location and signing in, a participant would do the following: 1. Read and sign the IRB-based informed consent form. The facilitator would also sign the consent form, and make a copy of the form for the participant. 2. Complete the Pretest Questionnaire. This will capture basic demographic information and technology preferences. 3. Next, he/she would complete the Usability Test Questionnaire using a static (non-functioning) display of the prototype for reference. Ideally, this will be an individual printout or monitor display at the participant s workstation. This will ensure testing of home page design items vs. entire website functionality. 4. Next, he/she would complete a Usability Task Analysis using a functional version of the prototype on their workstation. This would test a combination of home page and website functionality. 5. Last, he/she would complete a one-on-one interview by test facilitator. A blank copy of the consent form, pre-test questionnaire, usability questionnaire, task analysis and postinterview are located in Appendix B of this report. It was determined that all testing should occur one-on-one, meaning participants would be individually tested with a test facilitator present during the entire session. Testing in this manner would reduce influences or distractions that could occur during testing multiple individuals at the same time. The test facilitator s role during testing is to answer any questions, record notes and observations during the session, collect the completed documentation, and administer the post-test interview. Test Facilitator Training for GSU staff was conducted on Monday, April 5 th ; corresponding training documentation is included in Appendix C. During the training, three (3) library student workers participated in a practice 5/17/2004 9

10 run of the usability testing, which revealed no issues with the test instruments. This practice was also helpful for the facilitators to understand the particulars involved with testing. Acknowledgements: Dana Smith compiled and analyzed the test results and authored this report. Doug Goans and Dana Smith served as Principal Investigators for this study. Karen Hopkins, Tamla Williams, Patti Lee and Doug Goans served as Usability Test Facilitators. Many thanks go to Harry Dangle and Faye Borthick in the Center for Teaching and Learning, Tim Merrit in the ITC, Mohammad Gharib in the Library Media Center, and Rod Bustos in the Systems Office for assistance with testing facilities and equipment. Denita Hampton helped recruit participants for the pre-test. Laura Burtle, Jake Houle and Doug Goans also provided advisement, expertise, and input on the project overall. 5/17/

11 Test Results & Analysis Introduction The GSU Library Homepage Usability Testing took place between Wednesday, April 7 th and Thursday, April 15th. The number of participants was 15, consisting of 13 undergraduate and 2 graduate students. The following is a description of the average participant, based on the results gathered from the presession questionnaire: Average age between years old Undergraduate student, upperclassman (junior or senior) status Daily Internet user Comfortable with using Internet (self rating Intermediate to Expert) Uses the GSU Library Website on a weekly basis The students who participated in the usability study came from varied educational backgrounds and majors of study. A breakdown of the various majors is featured below: Major Course of Study marketing policy studies hospitality adm lang. studies no response poli sci bus/finance journalism film prod biology/pre-med crim just account. MPA The following sections will describe the data collected from each aspect of the testing. 5/17/

12 Pre-Test Questionnaire (Demographics) The pre-test questionnaire is used to measure user entry behaviors, attitudes and preferences about the Internet and the GSU Library website. # of responses Age Most participants were years of age 2 undergraduates identified and Oldest identified = It should be noted that the 2 graduate students who participated were in the age range. The individuals identifying as older are all undergraduates, and would be considered non-traditional students. 12 Gender Most participants were male, about 60% of the 15. # of responses male female # of responses Student Classification freshman sophomore junior senior grad student All participants were sophomore classification or above, inferring they had experience with GSU s online presence and the Library. 5/17/

13 While students had experience using the library from their GSU academic experience, the data will show not all have significant experience with using the library s online/electronic features and services. # of responses Online Frequency daily weekly monthly All reported using the Internet frequently Although the majority used the Internet on a weekly basis, they are not using the GSU Library Site that frequently. It can be inferred the participants are using the Internet for communication, entertainment, or other purposes. # of responses Internet Proficiency beginner intermediate advanced One participant rated themselves as beginner The rest of the participants feel comfortable using the Internet. Frequent use of the Internet and (self reported) proficiency seem to go hand in hand with these participants. # of responses GSU Library Website Usage daily weekly monthly "rare" "every 3 months" Two participants added the rare and every 3 months categories. Most participants use the Library site on a weekly basis. 5/17/

14 It should be noted that the individual who reported using the GSU Library site rarely was a senior undergrad student, but did not identify a major. This student may just use the brick and mortar library exclusively. # of responses Preferred Computer Platform mac windows unix other Overwhelmingly, Windows is the preferred operating system. It should be noted the individual comfortable with Macs is majoring in Film Production (where Macs are used almost exclusively). The last item on the questionnaire asked participants to rank (from most to least important) given criteria for evaluating a website. There were ten (10) criteria given ranging from website features to aesthetics and design. The following chart illustrates the criteria our participants identified as most important. Web Criteria Ranked Most Important # of responses short download color/layout easy nav useful info working links number of nav easy to read graphics/pics search The participants are clearly in favor of a website having a short download time, easy navigation, and having useful information. Aesthetics were not deemed very important, as gleaned from the next chart: 5/17/

15 Web Criteria Ranked Least Important # of responses short download color/layout easy nav useful info working links number of nav easy to read graphics/pics search The overwhelming response to the least important factor for a website was the quality of graphics or photos; next was the color & layout. One individual selected working links as being least important, which would indicate their standards for web experience are really low, and/or they have a high level of patience for potentially frustrating web experiences. Usability Questionnaire This questionnaire was given with regard to a graphic (JPEG) display of the prototype design. This would allow for users to take into account the navigation terminology, placement and hierarchy within the layout. It would also allow for users to give their first instinctual answer, since they could not actually click on a functional site to verify their answer. Users were asked to identify which link or button they would select from the design to find the given information (phrased in the form of questions). Out of the 10 questions given, 4 of them resulted in consistent, correct answers from our participants. These questions were: Question 1: How would you find articles online? Participants selected either Finding Articles (button) or Articles (text menu link) both would satisfy finding online articles. Question 5: How would you find the GSU Library hours during Exam Week? All but one participant selected Hours (text menu link); one person selected About the Library both would yield the correct information. Question 6: How would you determine if a book is available for checkout? 5/17/

16 Most users selected Find Books (button) or Books (text menu link); 3 participants did choose Borrow Materials (text menu link) Question 8: How would you find the phone # for the Circulation Desk? All but one participant selected Contact Us (text menu link) which would yield the desired information. One person selected Ask A Librarian (text menu link). The other questions drew varied responses. They are discussed in more detail in the following charts. It should be noted that the correct answers are really the preferred answers given by GSU Library. There is usually more than one path to the desired information. These correct answers are the best (shortest) path to the information requested. Note: For the charts, B = Button, U = Utility Menu, M = Text menu # of responses Question 2: Current GALILEO Password B: Search GALILEO U: Passwords M: Student Services B: Find Books Apparently participants made the association the Galileo link would give the desired information; this is actually incorrect. The correct answer is Passwords only 4 people selected this. This misconception could be due to users unfamiliarity with using GALILEO (and the password). Question 3: Map/Directions to Library # of responses M: Visitor Info M: Contact Us M: About the Library M: More (About Library) The correct answer is Visitor Info ; however the other About Library choices may yield the desired information. 5/17/

17 Contact Us should imply contact information (such as phone, address, ). This may be a good place to provide a redundant or supplemental link to map/directions from (or near) where the address information is located. Question 4: Starting Biology Paper Research # of repsonses The correct answer is Research Guides, which the majority of participants selected. 0 M: Research Guides M: Ask a Librarian Search Box B: Finding articles B: Search GALILEO The other choices could yield the desired information for Biology research, however the route may be more time-consuming. # of responses Question 7: Course Reserve Materials M: Course Reserves M: Special Collections B: Find Books (GIL Online Catalog) M: Ask a Librarian Again, the majority picked the correct answer ( Course Reserves ), but the varied responses indicate unfamiliarity with library online services. Question 9: Biology Librarian Office Hours # of responses M: Visitor Info M: Faculty Services M: Ask a Librarian M: Contact Us M: More (About Library) M: Student Services Search Box The correct selection is Research Guides (which no one selected) A second choice is Contact Us 1 user did select this. The majority of users are making a reasonable connection between Ask a Librarian and seeking office hours for a subject librarian. Also, many of the comments recorded during this questionnaire indicated 5/17/

18 most of our participants were not aware of subject librarians, research guides or how either would be useful. Question 10: Getting a book not at GSU Library # of responses M: Library Service M: Interlibrary Loan M: Borrow Materials M: Contact Us M: Find Information B: Search GALILEO M: Books The correct selection is Interlibrary Loan, which the majority of participants selected. The most plausible explanation for the varied answers is that most participants were not aware of how to use Interlibrary Loan (or did not understand or recognize the terminology). Task Analysis The usability task analysis featured the functional version of the prototype at the participant s workstation. This tested a combination of home page design and website functionality, since the rest of the website kept the current design. This was also an opportunity to gather opinions on other features not operated by GSU Libraries, such as GIL, GALILEO, or ERes. Tasks 1 and 5 were easily handled by users. Each task was completed quickly (based on average time calculated from all responses), and had a high rate of correct responses. A summary of the task details and responses is featured below: Average Time to Complete Task Percentage of Correct Responses Task 1: Locate the current GALILEO password minutes 87% Task 2: Find out why you might NOT be able to renew a book minutes 93% For Tasks 2, 3, and 4, the time to complete the task was varied among all participants, indicating a measure of difficulty. Despite being slower, the correct response rate was fairly high for Tasks 3 and 4; 5/17/

19 Task 2 had a correct response rate of 60%. Typically, a correct response rate of 80% indicates suitable usability and understanding. The varied completion time are illustrated below: ID #235 ID #231 ID #230 ID #220 ID #165 ID #150 ID #110 ID #100 ID #90 ID #70 ID #50 ID #40 ID #30 ID #20 ID #10 Task 2: Psychology Librarian Name & time (minutes) ID #235 ID #231 ID #230 ID #220 ID #165 ID #150 ID #110 ID #100 ID #90 ID #70 ID #50 ID #40 ID #30 ID #20 ID #10 Task 3: Education Article Database (Full-Text) time (minutes) 5/17/

20 Task 4: AAS1000 Course Reserve ID #235 ID #231 ID #230 ID #220 ID #165 ID #150 ID #110 ID #100 ID #90 ID #70 ID #50 ID #40 ID #30 ID #20 ID # time (minutes) Post Test Interview The responses given during the post test interview were very favorable and appreciative of the new homepage design. Average responses are detailed below; users were asked score each criteria between 1 (low) and 5 (high). GSU Library Homepage Criteria Average Score appealing color & design 4.13 easy to navigate & understand 4.00 useful information & content 4.57 navigation links correspond to information 4.37 # of navigation options available 4.57 easy to read text/font size 4.37 quality of graphics and/or photos 4.10 easy access to most popular features /17/

21 Conclusions The following conclusions can be drawn from the usability test data collected: GSU Library Website users liked the new homepage design. The overwhelming preference was for the structured text link menus. By using these links, there was less dependence on the 4 button/icon navigation options and even feedback indicating they needed to be updated (design wise). The users had no problem identifying the preferred homepage links for the following information: finding articles online finding the GSU Library hours, department phone #, and related information determining if a book is available for checkout The users had no problem performing the following online tasks: Locating the current GALILEO password Finding out why one might NOT be able to renew a book The most serious Identification problem for navigation terms occurred with the following: Finding the Biology Reference Librarian s office hours The other identification problems may stem from users being unfamiliar with the library services. This may be countered by a help section or online tutorial. The most serious task performance issues occurred with the following: Finding the Psychology Reference Librarian s name and address The other task performance problems may stem from the third party applications with the GSU Library website. The ones featured in this study to perform database searching and course reserves access are beyond the direct control of Georgia State University. 5/17/

22 Design Recommendations The following design suggestions are recommended: Better terminology regarding Ask a Librarian, Research Guides, and Contact Us and the related information behind these links. An online tutorial to supplement the in-class tutorial offered by GSU Libraries, specifically tailored to online users and corresponding online library services. Add the Georgia State University (GSU) main website link to the utility menu (currently WebCT GoSOLAR Passwords ) Change the Passwords link name to something more intuitive (this may require soliciting suggestions from users). Suggestions include library passwords, off-campus access passwords Also include information about where to look up the current GALILEO password after selecting the GALILEO link (if possible). Provide multiple access (links) to information about Reference/Subject Librarians. For instance, many student sought this information under Ask a Librarian, which is a reasonable deduction however, the corresponding info is not currently there. Include candid photos of students using the library along with the renderings of the new library facilities. 5/17/

23 Appendix A. Homepage Prototype Design Process Prototype #1: Prototype #2: 5/17/

24 Prototype #3: Prototype #4: 5/17/

25 Prototype #5: FINAL Usability Test Prototype Design: 5/17/

26 Appendix B. Usability Test Instruments Spring 2004 Usability Test Questionnaire 1 Which navigation link would you select to find information about the following topics? 1. Finding articles online 2. Current GALILEO password 3. Map/Directions to GSU Library 4. How to get started doing research for a Biology paper 5. Library hours during Exam Week 6. If a book is available or checked out 7. Materials on reserve for a class 8. Circulation Desk Phone Number 9. Office hours of the Biology Librarian 10. Getting a book not owned by Library 5/17/

27 2 Spring 2004 Usability Test Task Analysis Task (1): Locate the current GALILEO password. Task (2): Find out the name of the Psychology librarian and his or her address. Task (3): Find a database that might have full-text articles on the topic of Education. Task (4): Find a list of items on reserve for Laura Burtle s African American Studies class (AAS1000). Task (5): Find a reason why you might NOT be able to renew your book online. 5/17/

28 Spring 2004 Usability Test Post Interview (to be administered by test facilitator): 3 Please rate the new homepage prototype using the criteria below: 1 = Poor 2 = Below Average 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent 1. Appealing color & layout design Easy to navigate & understand Useful information & content Navigation links correspond to information Number of navigation options available Easy to read text/font size Quality of graphics and/or photos Easy access to most popular features /17/

29 Appendix C. Test Facilitator Documents Spring 2004 Usability Test Task Analysis Script and Steps for Test Facilitators SETUP Turn on Laptop and set the home page to the IMAGE ONLY version. Clear the browser history cache. Make sure videotape is ready to go. Make sure students have their PantherCard and keep it handy ( they might need it for the first hands-on task with the active site). STEP 1. All participants must read, sign, and date the consent form. Ask if they want a copy. STEP 2. Ask for PantherCard ID to make a copy (photocopy or digital camera shot) so we may put a $5 PantherCash gift on it for participating. 5/17/

30 STEP 3. Read the following to them: Hello. Thank you for participating in our web site usability study. My name is, and I work for the GSU Library. I will be asking you some questions today about our new library home page that is being built. We want to make sure the new library home page is usable and that you are able to find information to help you with your research and class assignments. Therefore, I will be asking you some questions, which you will answer by looking at and using the new home page. The whole study should not take any longer than 40 to 50 minutes. I will be writing down important points you bring up while using the new home page. To make sure we capture all your suggestions, we need you to talk out loud. More importantly, let us know when you re stuck or if something does not make sense. As you us the home page, some of the links may not work as intended since this is a mock-up, or test version of the new home page. I will clue you to stop searching or to move on to the next task if this happens. Keep in mind that we are testing this new design of the library home page, not you! If you find that something does not make sense or the answer isn t obvious, this is the necessary information we need to make changes. Do you have any questions? 5/17/

31 STEP 4. Ask them to fill out the demographic survey. STEP 5. Bring up the IMAGE version of the new home page (added to the favorites list on the laptop) STEP 6. Conduct the 10 question test. They can refer to the list while you fill out your form. Record their selections and any comments they make STEP 7. Bring up the WORKING version of the new home page (set as default home page on the laptop) STEP 8. Conduct the 5 task test. They can refer to the list of tasks while you fill out your form. Ask them to begin and to let you know when they find the answer to the task and when they are moving on to the next task. Record the time they start and end, which links they use and any comments they make. If 5 minutes have passed but they have not completed a task prompt them to move on to the next task. Explain that you will follow up on that task in a post-test interview later. If they are silent you may inquire as to what they are thinking, what parts of the page they are looking at, and so forth. Ask open ended questions to get them to talk (not just questions where they would answer yes or no). STEP 8. Conduct the post-test interview. Tell them they may use the site to click and surf if needed to demonstrate anything they want to talk about or show you. They may refer to the list of rating questions while you write down their ratings and any comments. STEP 9. Show them the style preference choices, circle their preference and write any comments they make. STEP 10. Ask them if they have any other questions or comments. Thank them for participating. Deliver all the materials to Doug in the systems office or arrange for him to pick them up at your office. 5/17/

32 1 Spring 2004 Usability Test Questionnaire Which navigation link would you select to find information about the following topics? 11. Finding articles online 12. Current GALILEO password 13. Map/Directions to GSU Library 14. How to get started doing research for a Biology paper 15. Library hours during Exam Week 16. If a book is available or checked out 17. Materials on reserve for a class 18. Circulation Desk Phone Number 19. Office hours of the Biology Librarian 20. Getting a book not owned by Library 5/17/

33 Spring 2004 Usability Test Task Analysis Please answer the questions to the best of your ability using the website available. 2 Task (1): Locate the current GALILEO password. Time Start: Time End: Answer found?: Click 1: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 2: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 3: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 4: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 5: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Comments: 5/17/

34 Task (2): Find out the name of the Psychology librarian and his or her address. Time Start: Time End: Answer found?: Click 1: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 2: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 3: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 4: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 5: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Comments: 5/17/

35 Task (3): Find a database that might have full-text articles on the topic of Education. Time Start: Time End: Answer found?: Click 1: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 2: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 3: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 4: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 5: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Comments: 5/17/

36 Task (4): Find a list of items on reserve for Laura Burtle s African American Studies class (AAS1000). Time Start: Time End: Answer found?: Click 1: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 2: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 3: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 4: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 5: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Comments: 5/17/

37 Task (5): Find a reason why you might NOT be able to renew your book online. Time Start: Time End: Answer found?: Click 1: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 2: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 3: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 4: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Click 5: [ Menu or Button or Other ] Comments: 5/17/

38 Spring 2004 Usability Test Post Interview (to be administered by test facilitator): 3 Q1. What is your favorite thing about the new homepage prototype? Q2. What is your least favorite thing about the new homepage prototype? Please rate the new homepage prototype using the criteria below: 1 = Poor 3 = Average 5 = Excellent 2 = Below Average 4 = Good 1. Appealing color & layout design 2. Easy to navigate & understand 3. Useful information & content 4. Navigation links correspond to information 5. Number of navigation options available 6. Easy to read text/font size 7. Quality of graphics and/or photos 8. Easy access to most popular features 5/17/

39 Spring 2004 Usability Test Style Preference (to be administered by test facilitator): 4 (this link is in the Favorites list on the laptop) Circle their preference and write down any comments. Style # 1 ( what they have been using) Style #2 5/17/

Library Outages - Guerilla Test Round 2

Library Outages - Guerilla Test Round 2 University of Michigan Deep Blue deepblue.lib.umich.edu 2008-02 Library Outages - Guerilla Test Round 2 Bhaskaran, Pratibha; Williams, Krystle http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107027 Library Outages Guerilla

More information

Usability Test Report: Homepage / Search Interface 1

Usability Test Report: Homepage / Search Interface 1 Usability Test Report: Homepage / Search Interface 1 Summary Emily Daly, Bendte Fagge, and Steph Matthiesen conducted usability testing of the homepage and search interface in the newly redesigned Duke

More information

Usability Testing Report of College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (CLAS) Website

Usability Testing Report of College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (CLAS) Website Usability Testing Report of College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (CLAS) Website Submitted to: Ceily Hamilton, Director of Information Technology Alex Chapin, Executive Director of Academic Technology Compiled

More information

Website Usability Study: The American Red Cross. Sarah Barth, Veronica McCoo, Katelyn McLimans, Alyssa Williams. University of Alabama

Website Usability Study: The American Red Cross. Sarah Barth, Veronica McCoo, Katelyn McLimans, Alyssa Williams. University of Alabama Website Usability Study: The American Red Cross Sarah Barth, Veronica McCoo, Katelyn McLimans, Alyssa Williams University of Alabama 1. The American Red Cross is part of the world's largest volunteer network

More information

Interim Report: Ask a Librarian Reference Service User Feedback (Fall 2016)

Interim Report: Ask a Librarian  Reference Service User Feedback (Fall 2016) Interim Report: Ask a Librarian Email Reference Service User Feedback (Fall 2016) Report Authors: Martha Stuit, Harold Tuckett, Karen Reiman-Sendi Contact Information: htuckett@umich.edu Report Date: February

More information

Library Website Migration and Chat Functionality/Aesthetics Study February 2013

Library Website Migration and Chat Functionality/Aesthetics Study February 2013 Library Website Migration and Chat Functionality/Aesthetics Study February 2013 Summary of Study and Results Georgia State University is in the process of migrating its website from RedDot to WordPress

More information

Usability Test Report: Bento results interface 1

Usability Test Report: Bento results interface 1 Usability Test Report: Bento results interface 1 Summary Emily Daly and Ian Sloat conducted usability testing on the functionality of the Bento results interface. The test was conducted at the temporary

More information

Usability Test: 1 News, Events, and Exhibits

Usability Test: 1 News, Events, and Exhibits Assessment & User Experience Department Usability Test: 1 News, Events, and Exhibits Recommendations 1. Make the Exhibits at the Library and Upcoming Library Events headings on their respective boxes on

More information

NYU LIBRARY SERVICES: CARD SORT REPORT

NYU LIBRARY SERVICES: CARD SORT REPORT NYU LIBRARY SERVICES: CARD SORT REPORT HTTP://LIBRARY.NYU.EDU/SERVICES/ OCTOBER 22, 2013 REVISED FEBRUARY 1, 2014 PREPARED BY: NGOZI OKORO, SAMANTHA RADDATZ, AND SUSAN YOUNG TABLE OF CONTENTS Methodology...

More information

Usability Test Report: Requesting Library Material 1

Usability Test Report: Requesting Library Material 1 Usability Test Report: Requesting Library Material 1 Summary Emily Daly and Kate Collins conducted usability testing on the processes of requesting library material. The test was conducted at the temporary

More information

Folsom Library & RensSearch Usability Test Plan

Folsom Library & RensSearch Usability Test Plan Folsom Library & RensSearch Usability Test Plan Eric Hansen & Billy Halibut 1 Table of Contents Document Overview!... 3 Methodology!... 3 Participants!... 3 Training!... 4 Procedure!... 4 Roles!... 4 Ethics!5

More information

Discovering Information through Summon:

Discovering Information through Summon: Discovering Information through Summon: An Analysis of User Search Strategies and Search Success Ingrid Hsieh-Yee Professor, Dept. of Library and Information Science, Catholic University of America Shanyun

More information

Lo-Fidelity Prototype Report

Lo-Fidelity Prototype Report Lo-Fidelity Prototype Report Introduction A room scheduling system, at the core, is very simple. However, features and expansions that make it more appealing to users greatly increase the possibility for

More information

Western Libraries Website Re-Design Update ( July 2016)

Western Libraries Website Re-Design Update ( July 2016) Western Washington University Western CEDAR Usability & Design Working Group Documents Western Libraries Departmental, Committee, and Working Group Documents 7-2016 Western Libraries Website Re-Design

More information

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio October 30, 2012 WR 305.01 Written By: Kelsey Carper I pledge on my honor that I have not given or received any unauthorized assistance in the completion of

More information

IBM MANY EYES USABILITY STUDY

IBM MANY EYES USABILITY STUDY IBM MANY EYES USABILITY STUDY Team Six: Rod Myers Dane Petersen Jay Steele Joe Wilkerson December 2, 2008 I543 Interaction Design Methods Fall 2008 Dr. Shaowen Bardzell EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We asked three

More information

Usability Report. Author: Stephen Varnado Version: 1.0 Date: November 24, 2014

Usability Report. Author: Stephen Varnado Version: 1.0 Date: November 24, 2014 Usability Report Author: Stephen Varnado Version: 1.0 Date: November 24, 2014 2 Table of Contents Executive summary... 3 Introduction... 3 Methodology... 3 Usability test results... 4 Effectiveness ratings

More information

PNC.com, Weather.com & SouthWest.com. Usability Analysis. Tyler A. Steinke May 8, 2014 IMS 413

PNC.com, Weather.com & SouthWest.com. Usability Analysis. Tyler A. Steinke May 8, 2014 IMS 413 PNC.com, Weather.com & SouthWest.com Usability Analysis Tyler A. Steinke May 8, 2014 IMS 413 2 P a g e S t e i n k e Table of Contents Introduction 3 Executive Summary 3 Methodology 4 Results 4 Recommendations

More information

Usability Services at the University of Maryland: Who, What and How

Usability Services at the University of Maryland: Who, What and How Usability Services at the University of Maryland: Who, What and How Gina M. Jones University of Maryland Coordinator, Web Services Office of Information Technology gj35@umail.umd.edu ABSTRACT Web Services,

More information

Usability Test Report: Link 2.0 1

Usability Test Report: Link 2.0 1 Usability Test Report: Link 2.0 1 Summary Emily Daly and Ian Sloat conducted usability testing on the functionality of the Get it @Duke sidebar. The test was conducted at the temporary main entrance of

More information

USABILITY REPORT A REPORT OF USABILITY FINDINGS FOR OFF THE BEATEN PATH WEBSITE

USABILITY REPORT A REPORT OF USABILITY FINDINGS FOR OFF THE BEATEN PATH WEBSITE USABILITY REPORT A REPORT OF USABILITY FINDINGS FOR OFF THE BEATEN PATH WEBSITE Prepared by: Cori Vandygriff, Joseph Kmetz, Cammy Herman, and Kate DeBusk To: Off the Beaten Path Team From: Cammy Herman

More information

Usability Report Cover Sheet

Usability Report Cover Sheet Usability Report Cover Sheet Project Overall Project: MLibrary Website Project Title: Search/Browse Card Sort Committee & Members Usability Group: Suzanne Chapman (chair), Shevon Desai, Kat Hagedorn, Julie

More information

Selected Members of the CCL-EAR Committee Review Of McGraw-Hill 'AccessScience' May, 2001

Selected Members of the CCL-EAR Committee Review Of McGraw-Hill 'AccessScience' May, 2001 Selected Members of the CCL-EAR Committee Review Of McGraw-Hill 'AccessScience' May, 2001 During Spring, 2001, selected members of the California Community College Libraries, Electronic Access to Information

More information

Usability Study of the Coates Library Website at Trinity University: Two Years Later

Usability Study of the Coates Library Website at Trinity University: Two Years Later Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Library Faculty Research Coates Library 7-2-2008 Usability Study of the Coates Library Website at Trinity University: Two Years Later Benjamin R. Harris Trinity

More information

A Comparative Usability Test. Orbitz.com vs. Hipmunk.com

A Comparative Usability Test. Orbitz.com vs. Hipmunk.com A Comparative Usability Test Orbitz.com vs. Hipmunk.com 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Participants... 5 Procedure... 6 Results... 8 Implications... 12 Nuisance variables... 14 Future studies...

More information

EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT 2

EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT 2 EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT 2 CS5760 Graduate Human-Computer Interaction Abstract An investigation of the user interface domain, heuristic principles, and critical usability concerns for the current design and

More information

MiPhone Phone Usage Tracking

MiPhone Phone Usage Tracking MiPhone Phone Usage Tracking Team Scott Strong Designer Shane Miller Designer Sierra Anderson Designer Problem & Solution This project began as an effort to deter people from using their phones in class.

More information

Usability Testing Report: Lilly Library s Homepage 1

Usability Testing Report: Lilly Library s Homepage 1 Usability Testing Report: Lilly Library s Homepage 1 Summary On April 20, 2015, Emily Daly and Jaci Wilkinson conducted usability testing in the lobby of Lilly Library. Seven participants were interviewed

More information

Electronic Gateway Functional Team Website Usability Working Group Usability Test September 2005

Electronic Gateway Functional Team Website Usability Working Group Usability Test September 2005 Electronic Gateway Functional Team Website Usability Working Group Usability Test September 2005 Queen s University Library website http://library.queensu.ca/ SUMMARY There were 11 testers, drawn from

More information

GRADY NEWSOURCE KATE DEVLIN, LEAH MOSS, ANDREA SKELLIE & ASHLEY PANTER

GRADY NEWSOURCE KATE DEVLIN, LEAH MOSS, ANDREA SKELLIE & ASHLEY PANTER GRADY NEWSOURCE KATE DEVLIN, LEAH MOSS, ANDREA SKELLIE & ASHLEY PANTER INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY THE CLIENT GRADY NEWSOURCE Grady Newsource is a student production of the Grady College of Journalism &

More information

Consumers Energy Usability Testing Report

Consumers Energy Usability Testing Report Consumers Energy Usability Testing Report SI 622 Section 2 Group 2: Katrina Lanahan, Michael Grisafe, Robert Wang, Wei Wang, Yu-Ting Lu April 18th, 2014 1 Executive Summary This report addresses a usability

More information

Cognitive Walkthrough Evaluation

Cognitive Walkthrough Evaluation Columbia University Libraries / Information Services Digital Library Collections (Beta) Cognitive Walkthrough Evaluation by Michael Benowitz Pratt Institute, School of Library and Information Science Executive

More information

CPSC 444 Project Milestone III: Prototyping & Experiment Design Feb 6, 2018

CPSC 444 Project Milestone III: Prototyping & Experiment Design Feb 6, 2018 CPSC 444 Project Milestone III: Prototyping & Experiment Design Feb 6, 2018 OVERVIEW... 2 SUMMARY OF MILESTONE III DELIVERABLES... 2 1. Blog Update #3 - Low-fidelity Prototyping & Cognitive Walkthrough,

More information

Usability Testing. November 14, 2016

Usability Testing. November 14, 2016 Usability Testing November 14, 2016 Announcements Wednesday: HCI in industry VW: December 1 (no matter what) 2 Questions? 3 Today Usability testing Data collection and analysis 4 Usability test A usability

More information

Captivat-ing Library Instructional Services. Bradley Brazzeal Assistant Professor/Instructional Services Librarian

Captivat-ing Library Instructional Services. Bradley Brazzeal Assistant Professor/Instructional Services Librarian Captivat-ing Library Instructional Services by Bradley Brazzeal Assistant Professor/Instructional Services Librarian Deborah Lee Associate Professor/Coordinator, Library Instructional Services Mississippi

More information

Chris Jung, Garrick Li, Luyi Lu, Grant Neubauer CSE Autumn d: Usability Testing Review. Usability Test 1

Chris Jung, Garrick Li, Luyi Lu, Grant Neubauer CSE Autumn d: Usability Testing Review. Usability Test 1 Chris Jung, Garrick Li, Luyi Lu, Grant Neubauer CSE 440 - Autumn 2014 3d: Usability Testing Review Usability Test 1 Our first usability test was done with Glenn, a UW student, and took place in the HUB

More information

Momental. Adrienne I. (Observer) Juliana C. (Computer) Meredith M. (Greeter/Facilitator) Nhien T. (Observer)

Momental. Adrienne I. (Observer) Juliana C. (Computer) Meredith M. (Greeter/Facilitator) Nhien T. (Observer) Momental Adrienne I. (Observer) Juliana C. (Computer) Meredith M. (Greeter/Facilitator) Nhien T. (Observer) Introduction Momental Help the moment you need it. We are designing an application to allow Stanford

More information

Usability Testing: A tutorial and Case Study from the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Library

Usability Testing: A tutorial and Case Study from the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Library Usability Testing: A tutorial and Case Study from the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Library Andrea Japzon Drexel University Zimmerman Associates, Inc. Managing Electronic Resources Denver, Colorado

More information

Online Evaluation Tool: Dashboards and Reports

Online Evaluation Tool: Dashboards and Reports Slide 1 Online Evaluation Tool: Dashboards and DeLea Payne, Tad Piner Donna Albaugh, Kim Simmons, Robert Sox, Savon Willard, & Beth Ann Williams Welcome to our Online Evaluation Tool: Completing the Teacher

More information

THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT USER DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION BEST PRACTICES

THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT USER DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION BEST PRACTICES 5 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT USER DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION BEST PRACTICES THIS E-BOOK IS DIVIDED INTO 5 PARTS: 1. WHY YOU NEED TO KNOW YOUR READER 2. A USER MANUAL OR A USER GUIDE WHAT S THE DIFFERENCE?

More information

Documentation of SAP Student Lifecycle Management (IS-HER- CM) BS 7 (EHP 4)

Documentation of SAP Student Lifecycle Management (IS-HER- CM) BS 7 (EHP 4) Documentation of SAP Student Lifecycle Management (IS-HER- CM) BS 7 (EHP 4) Applies to: Student Lifecycle Management EHP4 For more information, visit the Higher Education & Research homepage. Summary This

More information

Web Evaluation Report Guidelines

Web Evaluation Report Guidelines Web Evaluation Report Guidelines Graduate Students: You are required to conduct a usability test for your final project in this course. Please review the project description and the evaluation rubric on

More information

iscreen Usability INTRODUCTION

iscreen Usability INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Context and motivation The College of IST recently installed an interactive kiosk called iscreen, designed to serve as an information resource for student/visitors to the College of IST. The

More information

Experimental Evaluation of Effectiveness of E-Government Websites

Experimental Evaluation of Effectiveness of E-Government Websites Experimental Evaluation of Effectiveness of E-Government Websites A. Basit Darem 1, Dr. Suresha 2 1 Research Scholar, DoS in Computer Science, University of Mysore 2 Associate Professor, DoS in Computer

More information

Usability Test Report: Tool for Books & More Bento Box 1

Usability Test Report: Tool for Books & More Bento Box 1 Usability Test Report: Tool for Books & More Bento Box 1 Summary Emily Daly and Bendte Fagge conducted usability testing that compared books and media search results using the Books & More tab in the search

More information

K-State Libraries Usability Team Report Summer 2013

K-State Libraries Usability Team Report Summer 2013 Running head: K-STATE LIBRARIES USABILITY TEAM REPORT SUMMER 2013 K-State Libraries Usability Team Report Summer 2013 Meagan Duever, Co-chair, Marc Nash, Co-chair Tara Coleman, Diana Farmer, Heather Healy,

More information

Stream Features Application Usability Test Report

Stream Features Application Usability Test Report Stream Features Application Usability Test Report Erin Norton and Katelyn Waara HU 4628: Usability and Instruction Writing Michigan Technological University April 24, 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary

More information

National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Norman, OK Website Redesign Proposal Report 12/14/2015

National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Norman, OK Website Redesign Proposal Report 12/14/2015 National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Norman, OK Website Redesign Proposal Report 12/14/2015 Lindsay Boerman, Brian Creekmore, Myleigh Neill TABLE OF CONTENTS Parts PAGE Abstract... 3 Introduction...

More information

SAP Help for Student Lifecycle Management

SAP Help for Student Lifecycle Management SAP Help for Student Lifecycle Management Applies to: Student Lifecycle Management EHP3 Summary This document describes the features and functions delivered with Student Lifecycle Management EHP3. Author(s):

More information

Users Satisfaction with OPAC Services and Future Demands Of Govt. College University, Lahore

Users Satisfaction with OPAC Services and Future Demands Of Govt. College University, Lahore Users Satisfaction with OPAC Services and Future Demands Of Govt. College University, Lahore Attia Firdous Librarian/Documentation Officer Directorate of Agricultural Information Punjab, Lahore Dr. Farzana

More information

Amsterdam Medical Center Department of Medical Informatics. Improve. Usability evaluation of the sign up process of the Improve app

Amsterdam Medical Center Department of Medical Informatics. Improve. Usability evaluation of the sign up process of the Improve app Amsterdam Medical Center Department of Medical Informatics Improve Usability evaluation of the sign up process of the Improve app Author L.J.M. Heerink Principal investigator Prof. Dr. M.W.M Jaspers Supervised

More information

Visual Appeal vs. Usability: Which One Influences User Perceptions of a Website More?

Visual Appeal vs. Usability: Which One Influences User Perceptions of a Website More? 1 of 9 10/3/2009 9:42 PM October 2009, Vol. 11 Issue 2 Volume 11 Issue 2 Past Issues A-Z List Usability News is a free web newsletter that is produced by the Software Usability Research Laboratory (SURL)

More information

Core Collection Search Portal Usability Report

Core Collection Search Portal Usability Report Core Collection Search Portal Usability Report Metasearch Infrastructure Project California Digital Library Jane Lee November 2004 CONTENTS I. Methodology...3 II. Findings...6 III. Specific User Interface

More information

Easy Survey Creator: User s Guide

Easy Survey Creator: User s Guide Easy Survey Creator: User s Guide The Easy Survey Creator software is designed to enable faculty, staff, and students at the University of Iowa Psychology Department to quickly and easily create surveys

More information

Usability test report: Digital Collections 1

Usability test report: Digital Collections 1 Usability test report: Digital Collections 1 Recommendations to consider 1. Put button to request item for on-site use in the Item Info section or the right sidebar. 2. Reword Start Over to clarify that

More information

Memorandum Participants Method

Memorandum Participants Method Memorandum To: Elizabeth Pass, Associate Professor, School of Writing, Rhetoric and Technical Communication From: Andrew Carnes, WRTC 456 Section 1[ADC] Date: February 2, 2016 Re: Project 1 Competitor

More information

This exam is open book / open notes. No electronic devices are permitted.

This exam is open book / open notes. No electronic devices are permitted. SENG 310 Midterm February 2011 Total Marks: / 40 Name Solutions Student # This exam is open book / open notes. No electronic devices are permitted. Part I: Short Answer Questions ( / 12 points) 1. Explain

More information

Usability Test Report: get Interface 1

Usability Test Report: get Interface 1 Usability Test Report: get it@duke Interface 1 Summary Emily Daly, Bendte Fagge, and Candy Guevarra conducted usability testing on the functionality of the get it@duke interface. The test was held outside

More information

Foundation Level Syllabus Usability Tester Sample Exam Answers

Foundation Level Syllabus Usability Tester Sample Exam Answers Foundation Level Syllabus Usability Tester Sample Exam s Version 2017 Provided by German Testing Board Copyright Notice This document may be copied in its entirety, or extracts made, if the source is acknowledged.

More information

End of Summer Usability Study

End of Summer Usability Study End of Summer Usability Study Page 1 Table of Contents: Update Timeline of Events Page 2 Original Project Proposal & What s Changed Page 3 Summary of Usability Survey Results Page 4 Hallway Usability Testing

More information

CAREER SERVICES MANAGER, Powered by Symplicity STUDENT AND ALUMNI INSTRUCTION MANUAL

CAREER SERVICES MANAGER, Powered by Symplicity STUDENT AND ALUMNI INSTRUCTION MANUAL CAREER SERVICES MANAGER, Powered by Symplicity STUDENT AND ALUMNI INSTRUCTION MANUAL HOME TAB Log in at https://law-hamline-csm.symplicity.com/students/. Students For students, your login is your email

More information

itunes Usability Report SUNNY FAGALDE CONCEPTS & PRACTICES IN USABILITY TESTING

itunes Usability Report SUNNY FAGALDE CONCEPTS & PRACTICES IN USABILITY TESTING itunes Usability Report SUNNY FAGALDE CONCEPTS & PRACTICES IN USABILITY TESTING Contents Executive Summary Research Goals Participant Information Methodology Research Findings Recommendations Appendix

More information

First-Time Usability Testing for Bluetooth-Enabled Devices

First-Time Usability Testing for Bluetooth-Enabled Devices The University of Kansas Technical Report First-Time Usability Testing for Bluetooth-Enabled Devices Jim Juola and Drew Voegele ITTC-FY2005-TR-35580-02 July 2004 Project Sponsor: Bluetooth Special Interest

More information

1. The Best Practices Section < >

1. The Best Practices Section <   > DRAFT A Review of the Current Status of the Best Practices Project Website and a Proposal for Website Expansion August 25, 2009 Submitted by: ASTDD Best Practices Project I. Current Web Status A. The Front

More information

Instructional Design: ADDIE Model

Instructional Design: ADDIE Model Instructional Design: ADDIE Model RenWeb Training for Teachers at Trinity Lutheran School EDT 892 Instructional Design Tiffany Gurgel October 2013 EDT 892 Instructional Design - RenWeb Training by Tiffany

More information

A short introduction to. designing user-friendly interfaces

A short introduction to. designing user-friendly interfaces A short introduction to designing user-friendly interfaces Usability is often ignored until it becomes a problem Introduction This booklet is about Usability and User Experience design. It is aimed at

More information

Spring II 2019 Welcome to TechConnections, the City of Sacramento s technology program for adults ages 50+, based at Hart Senior Center.

Spring II 2019 Welcome to TechConnections, the City of Sacramento s technology program for adults ages 50+, based at Hart Senior Center. Spring II 2019 Welcome to TechConnections, the City of Sacramento s technology program for adults ages 50+, based at Hart Senior Center. The program is staffed primarily by volunteers. TechConnections

More information

ONS Beta website. 7 December 2015

ONS Beta website. 7 December 2015 ONS Beta website Terminology survey results 7 December 2015 Background During usability sessions, both moderated and online, it has become clear that users do not understand the majority of terminology

More information

Zoom User Manual. developed. Gary P. Davis. and. David J. Ayersman. for. Students and Employees of New River Community and Technical College

Zoom User Manual. developed. Gary P. Davis. and. David J. Ayersman. for. Students and Employees of New River Community and Technical College Zoom User Manual developed by Gary P. Davis and David J. Ayersman for Students and Employees of Zoom manual.docx Page 1 of 35 Last Updated: August 13, 2018 PREFACE AND OVERVIEW For the fall 2018 term,

More information

OAC FIRST RO U N D USABIL IT Y TES T FIND I N GS. OAC Redesign Project

OAC FIRST RO U N D USABIL IT Y TES T FIND I N GS. OAC Redesign Project OAC FIRST RO U N D USABIL IT Y TES T FIND I N GS OAC Redesign Project Prepared by: Jane Lee Last modified: 11 September 2008 oac_usability_aug2008.doc Page 2 of 22 Table of Contents Introduction...3 Purpose

More information

User Experience Research Report: Heuristic Evaluation

User Experience Research Report: Heuristic Evaluation User Experience Research Report: Heuristic Evaluation SI 622 003 Group 3: Yunqi Hu, Diane Pham, Chieh-Lin Wu, Ruofan Zhang Date: March 31, 2016 Word Count: 2,610 Table of Contents Executive Summary...

More information

Usability Test Report for Programming Staff

Usability Test Report for Programming Staff Evaluation Assignment # 6 Usability Test Report for Programming Staff http://cshci-dev.mtu.edu:8084/ UX Expert : Sree Ram Akula (sreerama@mtu.edu) Programming Staff Development Team http://www.csl.mtu.edu/classes/cs4760/www/projects/s16/group4/www/

More information

SWEN 444 Human Centered Requirements and Design Project Breakdown

SWEN 444 Human Centered Requirements and Design Project Breakdown SWEN 444 Human Centered Requirements and Design Project Breakdown Team Status Reports: (starting in Week 2) Your team will report weekly project status to your instructor, and as you wish, capture other

More information

Due on: May 12, Team Members: Arpan Bhattacharya. Collin Breslin. Thkeya Smith. INFO (Spring 2013): Human-Computer Interaction

Due on: May 12, Team Members: Arpan Bhattacharya. Collin Breslin. Thkeya Smith. INFO (Spring 2013): Human-Computer Interaction Week 6 Assignment: Heuristic Evaluation of Due on: May 12 2013 Team Members: Arpan Bhattacharya Collin Breslin Thkeya Smith INFO 608-902 (Spring 2013): Human-Computer Interaction Group 1 HE Process Overview

More information

CHAPTER 18: CLIENT COMMUNICATION

CHAPTER 18: CLIENT COMMUNICATION CHAPTER 18: CLIENT COMMUNICATION Chapter outline When to communicate with clients What modes of communication to use How much to communicate How to benefit from client communication Understanding your

More information

User Testing Study: Collaborizm.com. Jessica Espejel, Megan Koontz, Lauren Restivo. LIS 644: Usability Theory and Practice

User Testing Study: Collaborizm.com. Jessica Espejel, Megan Koontz, Lauren Restivo. LIS 644: Usability Theory and Practice User Testing Study: Collaborizm.com Jessica Espejel, Megan Koontz, Lauren Restivo LIS 644: Usability Theory and Practice TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION... 4 METHODOLOGY... 5 FINDINGS

More information

Information Architecture

Information Architecture Information Architecture Why, What, & How Internet Technology 1 Why IA? Information Overload Internet Technology 2 What is IA? Process of organizing & presenting information in an intuitive & clear manner.

More information

Welcome to our new catalog!

Welcome to our new catalog! Welcome to our new catalog! Use this guide to become familiar with the new catalog's features and functions. To get started, choose one of these topics: Finding your way around Searching Working with search

More information

interview.io Final Report

interview.io Final Report CSE 440 Section D Autumn 2017 interview.io Final Report Track & Manage Job Interviews Contents Contents 1 Team 2 Problem & Solution Overview 2 Initial Paper Prototype 2 Overview 3 Task 1: Tracking Interview

More information

When you are logged into My Siena, you cannot use the Browser s Back and Forward buttons to navigate from one area to another. You need to use the

When you are logged into My Siena, you cannot use the Browser s Back and Forward buttons to navigate from one area to another. You need to use the When you are logged into My Siena, you cannot use the Browser s Back and Forward buttons to navigate from one area to another. You need to use the tabs at the top of the My Siena page or the links directly

More information

Nights & Weekend ROB & PHIL DECEMBER 12, 2008

Nights & Weekend ROB & PHIL DECEMBER 12, 2008 Nights & Weekend ROB & PHIL DECEMBER 12, 2008 Input Surveys R&IS Student Assistant R&IS Faculty & Staff Access Services Students Statistics Totals Services R&IS & Access Service Seniority R&IS Student

More information

Final Report: Ask a Librarian Reference Service User Feedback (Winter 2017)

Final Report: Ask a Librarian  Reference Service User Feedback (Winter 2017) Final Report: Ask a Librarian Email Reference Service User Feedback (Winter 2017) Report Authors: Martha Stuit, Harold Tuckett, Karen Reiman-Sendi Contact Information: htuckett@umich.edu Report Date: April

More information

Analytical &! Empirical Evaluation

Analytical &! Empirical Evaluation Analytical &! Empirical Evaluation Informatics 132 5/22/2012 TODAY Evaluation Due: A3 Paper Prototyping UPCOMING Friday: Group Project Time Monday: Memorial Day, No Class Wednesday: HCI in the Real World

More information

User Experience. 10 Principles to Ensure a Great. on your Website. Issue 3. An Appnovation Digital ebook

User Experience. 10 Principles to Ensure a Great. on your Website. Issue 3. An Appnovation Digital ebook Issue 3 10 Principles to Ensure a Great User Experience on your Website An Appnovation Digital ebook 10 Principles to Ensure a Great User Experience on your Website www.appnovation.com P.1 Thank you for

More information

Federated Searching: User Perceptions, System Design, and Library Instruction

Federated Searching: User Perceptions, System Design, and Library Instruction Federated Searching: User Perceptions, System Design, and Library Instruction Rong Tang (Organizer & Presenter) Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Simmons College, 300 The Fenway, Boston,

More information

Eyetracking Study: Kent State University Library. Janie Ralston

Eyetracking Study: Kent State University Library. Janie Ralston Eyetracking Study: Kent State University Library Janie Ralston Ralston 2 Executive Summary Eyetracking web usability studies allow designers to see where the hot spots are and what information or graphics

More information

N C MPASS. Getting Started. Version 6.8

N C MPASS. Getting Started. Version 6.8 N C MPASS Getting Started Version 6.8 Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN) All rights reserved. Last update: May 24, 2018 This document is the property of OTN. No part of this document may be reproduced

More information

Usability Test Plan for Blogger Mobile Application

Usability Test Plan for Blogger Mobile Application Usability Test Plan for Blogger Mobile Application Prepared For: Kevin McGowan, Project Sponsor Luke Bjerring, Software Engineer Completed By: Alanna Lewis B l o g g e r. c o m 7 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 5 Table

More information

Past Performance Evaluation Report (PPE) Ordering Instructions and Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

Past Performance Evaluation Report (PPE) Ordering Instructions and Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents Past Performance Evaluation Report (PPE) Ordering Instructions and Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents I. OVERVIEW OF PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION... 2 What is the Past Performance Evaluation (PPE)

More information

facebook a guide to social networking for massage therapists

facebook a guide to social networking for massage therapists facebook a guide to social networking for massage therapists table of contents 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 13 15 get the facts first the importance of social media, facebook and the difference between different facebook

More information

1. Select/view stores based on product type/category- 2. Select/view stores based on store name-

1. Select/view stores based on product type/category- 2. Select/view stores based on store name- COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS Context The world of mobile computing is fast paced. There are many developers providing free and subscription based applications on websites like www.palmsource.com. Owners of portable

More information

Blackboard Training Manual PART I

Blackboard Training Manual PART I Blackboard Training Manual PART I Operating a Blackboard Course December, 2010 Prepared by: Department of General Studies And the Faculty Development Center Amy L. Sommerville Edited by: Christopher Braster

More information

ParentConnection User Guide

ParentConnection User Guide ParentConnection User Guide Table of Contents How to Access ParentConnection for the Anchorage School District... Welcome Parents!... Computer Requirements... Finding ParentConnection & Logging In... Your

More information

Design Proposal: Outline

Design Proposal: Outline Design Proposal: Outline This outline should be used as a checklist to help each member of the team make sure that every section of the document meets the requirements for a design proposal. Writing Style

More information

Welcome! The Clarion University Libraries. In This Issue Welcome! CU Libraries Links: Inside The Clarion University Libraries

Welcome! The Clarion University Libraries. In This Issue Welcome! CU Libraries Links: Inside The Clarion University Libraries August 27, 2013 The Clarion University Libraries Volume 9, Number 1 In This Issue Welcome! Libraries Services And Hours Carlson Lab S.W.A.T. Team Library Tip: ID Cards Faculty Tip: Library Staffing Update

More information

Periodicals Tutorial

Periodicals Tutorial Periodicals Tutorial Periodicals Module Introduction Periodical articles are a good source of current information. Online periodical indexes/databases are the best way to locate these articles. Databases

More information

PeopleSoft Departmental Student Records Training. Bloomsburg University

PeopleSoft Departmental Student Records Training. Bloomsburg University PeopleSoft Departmental Student Records Training Bloomsburg University 1 Table of Contents Bloomsburg University Training Notes... 3 Terminology Crosswalk... 3 Term Code Logic... 3 Viewing a Student s

More information

UC Irvine Law Library Website Usability Project Initial Presentation

UC Irvine Law Library Website Usability Project Initial Presentation UC Irvine Law Library Website Usability Project Initial Presentation Informatics 132 Prof. Alfred Kobsa Spring 2011 April 18, 2011 Group Members Julie Darwish Michelle Houang Marcel Pufal Ryan Wade Law

More information

Problem and Solution Overview: An elegant task management solution, that saves busy people time.

Problem and Solution Overview: An elegant task management solution, that saves busy people time. An elegant task management solution, that saves busy people time. Team: Anne Aoki: Storyboarding, design, user studies, writing Alex Anderson: User studies, design Matt Willden: Ideation, writing, user

More information

Research, Development, and Evaluation of a FRBR-Based Catalog Prototype

Research, Development, and Evaluation of a FRBR-Based Catalog Prototype Research, Development, and Evaluation of a FRBR-Based Catalog Prototype Yin Zhang School of Library and Information Science Kent State University yzhang4@kent.edu Athena Salaba School of Library and Information

More information