Studies of 1 µm-thick silicon strip detector with analog VLSI readout arxiv:physics/981234v1 [physics.ins-det] 18 Dec 1998 T. Hotta a,1, M. Fujiwara a, T. Kinashi b, Y. Kuno c, M. Kuss a,2, T. Matsumura a, T. Nakano a, S. Sekikawa d, H. Tajima e and K. Takanashi a a Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka 567, Japan b Department of Physics, Yamagata University Yamagata, Yamagata 99, Japan c Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies (IPNS), High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 35, Japan d Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 35, Japan e Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan Abstract We evaluate the performances of a 1 µm-thick silicon strip detector (SSD) with a 3 MeV proton beam and a 9 Sr β-ray source. Signals from the SSD have been read out using a VLSI chip. Common-mode noise, signal separation efficiency and energy resolution are compared with those for the SSD s with a thickness of 3 µm and 5 µm. Energy resolution for minimum ionizing particles (MIP s) is improved by fitting the non-constant component in a common-mode noise with a linear function. 1 Introduction A silicon strip detector (SSD) has the highest position resolution among the electric tracking devices in particle physics experiments. However, an error in measuring the track angle is dominated by the multiple scattering effect for particles with a low velocity. If the effect is reduced with a very thin SSD, new experiments which are impossible by the present technology will be realized. 1 Corresponding author. e-mail hotta@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp 2 Present Address: Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA 2366, USA Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 2 February 28
One example is a search for the T violation in the decay of B mesons [1], in which the T-violating transverse τ + polarization in the decay B Dτ + ν will be measured to a precision of 1 2. In order to obtain the τ polarization the decay vertices of B and τ must be measured separately. A simulation shows that the experiment will be feasible only with very thin SSD s at asymmetricenergy B factories. In general, a thin SSD has a small signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio because the energy deposit in the detector is proportional to the thickness and its large capacitance results in a large noise. Thus careful treatment of a noise in the off-line analysis is important. In this paper, we evaluate the performances of a 1 µm-thick silicon strip detector. The performances are compared with those of the 3 µm and 5 µmthick silicon strip detectors. 2 Detector Single-sided silicon detectors with the dimensions of 1 cm 1.3 cm have been fabricated by Hamamatsu Photonics. The strip pitch is 1 µm. The widths of implantation strips and aluminum electrodes are 42 µm and 34 µm, respectively. Three detectors with different thicknesses (1 µm, 3 µm, and 5 µm) were tested. The 1 µm-thick SSD was made by etching a 3 µmthick wafer. The analog VLSI chips (VA2 3 ) [2] are used as a readout circuit of the detectors. An SSD and a VLSI chip were mounted on a printed circuit board called hybrid board. 3 Experiment Two different particles were used for evaluation of the detector performances. A proton beam was used to measure the response of detectors for baryons or heavy particles. To see the response for light and high velocity particles which satisfy the minimum ionizing particle (MIP) condition (E/m > 3), electrons from a 9 Sr β-ray source was used. The experiment was carried out with a proton beam at the Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University. Scattered protons from a 12 C target were momentum analyzed by a magnetic spectrometer. A detector system that consists of an SSD and two trigger plastic scintillation counters was placed 3 Produced by Integrated Detector and Electronics AS (IDEAS), Oslo, Norway. 2
The schematic view of the readout system. he spectrometer. The momentum of detected protons he momentum spread of <.5%. The energy loss for V/c is 68 kev for the 1 µm-thick SSD, which is about hat for the minimum ionizing protons. schematically shown in Fig. 1. The hybrid board conp and a VA2 chip was connected to a repeater card, converters for logic signals, buffer amplifier for analog ustable bias supply for the VA2 chip. The VA2 chip was based timing board which received a trigger signal and for VA2 and a VME based flash ADC board. Analog m VA2 was sent to a flash ADC through the repeater gger counters were placed in front of the SSD. The rected to the hybrid board with a ribbon cable for both gnals. The length of the ribbon cable was about 15 cm. Trigger Counter SSD Trigger VA2 Timing Module Hybrid Board Flash ADC VME Repeater Card e characteristics of silicon strip detectors, the operation 2 readout chips were fixed to standard values without measurement. Signal shaping time was about 7 ns. in 4 µsec clock repetition. Typical trigger rate was beam test, measurements with a 9 Sr β-ray source were Sr β-ray source was placed at 15 mm from the SSD. ze of 2 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness was ons perpendicularly to the SSD. In order to realize the dition, a high energy component of β-rays was selected n counter placed behind the SSD. Operation parameters e same as those at the proton beam test. Readout clock r rate at the β-ray source test was about 7 Hz. 3
arbitrary counts 2 15 1 5 6 4 2 6 4 proton 8 Mev/c 1 µm 3 µm 5 µm 2-1 1 2 3 4 5 max. pulse height (kev) Fig. 2. The maximum pulse height for proton signals (solid lines) and noises (dotted lines) for the 1 µm, 3 µm, and 5 µm-thick SSD s. 4 Analysis and Results An output from each strip has a different offset level. These differences have been trimmed at the first step of the off-line analysis. Solid lines in Fig. 2 show the maximum pulse height distributions after the pedestal trimming for 1 µm, 3 µm, and 5 µm-thick SSD s at the proton beam test. Note that we have neglected the effect of charge division among adjacent strip. Dotted lines show the same distributions under the condition that no charged particle hit the detector. The noise peak and proton signal peak have overlapped for the 1 µm-thick SSD, while the proton signals are clearly distinguished from noises for the 5 µm and 3 µm-thick SSD s. For 1 µm-thick SSD, a strong noise level correlation between non-adjacent channels has been observed. This indicates that the main component of the noise has a common phase and amplitude among the strips. This component called common-mode noise (CMN) has been calculated as an averaged pulse height over all strips. In the calculation, channels with significantly large pulse heights; larger than 3 standard deviation (σ) of the noise distribution, have been excluded. Fig. 3 shows the maximum pulse height distribution after the CMN subtraction for the 1 µm SSD. Proton events are clearly separated from the noise. We have investigated the characteristics of noise more carefully. Fig. 4(a) shows the strip dependence of the noise width after the CMN subtraction. The width depends on the strip number, whereas pulse height differences between 4
arbitrary counts 8 6 4 2 proton 8 MeV/c 1 µm 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 max. pulse height (kev) Fig. 3. Maximum pulse height for protons (solid line) and noise (dotted line) after the CMN subtraction for the 1 µm-thick SSD. 6 4 2 (a) σ (kev) 6 4 2 6 4 (b) 2 (c) 2 4 6 8 1 12 strip number Fig. 4. Strip dependence of the noise width, σ. (a) After subtracting the constant CMN, (b) width of the difference between adjacent strips, (c) After the CMN subtraction by linear-fitting. adjacent two strips shown in Fig. 4(b) have a constant value of about 6. This indicates that the intrinsic σ of the noise is expected to be about 4.2 (= 6/ 2) for all strips. Thus, we conclude that the CMN has a non-constant component. Instead of simply averaging the pulse heights, we fit them with a linear curve to get CMN as a function of a channel number. Fig. 4(c) shows the noise widths after this method is applied. The widths are about 4.2 for all strips as expected. If the CMN is not removed correctly by assuming a constant CMN, a noise width depends on a strip number (Fig. 4(a)). This may cause a strip dependent S/N separation which are not desirable for any experiments. Fitting the CMN with a linear curve is particularly important for the detection of MIP s 5
3 2 electron 9 Sr 1 µm (a) arbitrary counts 1 3 2 1 (b) 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 max. pulse height (kev) Fig. 5. Maximum pulse height of electrons from 9 Sr source for the 1 µm SSD after the CMN subtraction by constant (a) and linear-fitting (b). 1 efficiency.75.5 signal: electron noise: const. CMN noise: lin.-fit CMN.25 1 12 14 16 18 threshold (kev) Fig. 6. Detection efficiency for electrons (dotted curve) with the 1 µm-thick SSD. Solid and dashed curves indicate the fraction of noise peak after the constant CMN-subtraction and the linear-fitting methods were applied, respectively. with a thin SSD where the S/N ratio is small. The maximum pulse height distribution for electrons with 1 µm-thick SSD after subtracting the CMN by linear-fitting is shown in Fig. 5(b) compared with that with a constant CMN subtraction (Fig. 5(a)). Although electron events are not separated from the noise for both cases, the separation of signals from noises is improved by the linear-fitting method 4. Fig. 5 indicates that there is a finite probability of misidentifying a noise as a particle track by selecting the maximum pulse height. The detection efficiency and signal misidentification probability for electrons with 1 µm-thick SSD are plotted as a function of threshold energies in Fig. 6. When a threshold level is set to detect the electron with an efficiency more than 99% the probability of misidentification obtained by linear-fitting of CMN is 27% smaller compared to that by the constant CMN-subtraction method. 4 β-rays were irradiated at the central strips by using a collimator. It is expected that this improvement is clearly seen for the strips near the edge of the detector. 6
Table 1 S/N ratios for β-ray electron signal. SSD thickness 1 µm 3 µm without CMN subtraction 4.91 17.1 constant CMN 7.45 28.7 linear-fitted CMN 7.88 29.7 Table 2 Noise width[kev] at the 9 Sr β-ray source test (and proton beam test). SSD thickness 1 µm 3 µm 5 µm no CMN subtraction 7.34 (27.7) 6.27 (4.77) (3.27) constant CMN 4.83 (4.18) 3.73 (3.58) (2.89) linear-fitted CMN 4.57 (4.14) 3.6 (3.56) (2.84) The S/N ratio obtained from β-ray source tests for the 1 µm and 3 µm SSD s are summarized in Table 1. Better S/N ratio is obtained by fitting CMN with a linear curve. The S/N ratios obtained with the assumption of a constant CMN for both the 1 µm and 3 µm SSD s are slightly worse. For a 3 µm SSD, the difference of two methods in subtracting the CMN is not very important in an actual application because the S/N ratio is sufficiently large. Noise width obtained in the 9 Sr β-ray source test and the proton beam test are summarized in Table 2 in energy unit (kev). The width of CMN at the β-ray source test is different from that at the proton beam test. But the noise after the CMN subtraction is almost the same. There remains a possibility to improve the S/N ratio by considering the charge division among adjacent strips during finding a particle trajectory. Performances of the prototype detector might be improved by optimizing its operating conditions. 5 Conclusion An SSD with a thickness of 1 µm was tested with 8 MeV/c protons and β-rays from 9 Sr source. By using an analog VLSI chip for readout, we remove the CMN. Assuming that CMN is constant among all strips, proton signals are separated from noises for the 1 µm, 3 µm and 5 µm-thick SSD s after the CMN subtraction. We found that a non-constant component in CMN makes the energy resolution worse. For the 1 µm SSD, the signal and noise separation was improved by fitting CMN with a linear curve at a β-ray source test. We conclude that a 1 µm SSD with analog VLSI readout can be used as a very thin tracking device in a future experiment. However, careful treatment 7
of CMN is important for detecting MIP s. Acknowledgements This work has been supported by the Grant-in-Aid for General Science Research (No. 745457 and No. 964358) by the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. References [1] Y. Kuno, Chinese J. of Phys. 32(1994)115. [2] O. Toker, S. Masciocchi, E. Nygård, A. Rudge and P. Weilhammer, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A34(1994)572. 8