Original Article (HNPCC) Downloaded from tmuj.iautmu.ac.ir at 19: on Friday March 22nd Log rank

Similar documents
HEREDITARY COLORECTAL CANCER: INFORMATION-BASED APPROACH. Elena Manilich. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

QUICK START GUIDE. A Publication of

Dynamic Data Integration in Clinical Research

EVIDENCE SEARCHING IN EBM. By: Masoud Mohammadi

2. Take a few minutes to look around the site. The goal is to familiarize yourself with a few key components of the NCBI.

Supplementary Appendix

Modelling Personalized Screening: a Step Forward on Risk Assessment Methods

Original Article. Downloaded from tmuj.iautmu.ac.ir at 20: on Friday March 22nd (

Gene signature selection to predict survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC patients

cbioportal /5/401

Collecting Public Health Data at a Global Scale. D. Cenk Erdil, PhD Marist College

National Core Content Collection April 2015 March 2018

CS47300: Web Information Search and Management

Original Article. Downloaded from iau-tmuj.ir at 5: on Friday October 12th 2018 CVA. <Starkestein. (

Classification and Optimization using RF and Genetic Algorithm

Downloaded from ijn.iums.ac.ir at 22:58 IRDT on Friday March 22nd 2019

P A T I E N T C E N T E R E D M E D I C A L H O M E ( P C M H ) A T T E S T A T I O N O F F A C I L I T Y C O M P L I A N C E

Annotating PDFs for ereturn version 1.0; August 28, 2007; full release

Optimization of fuzzy multi-company workers assignment problem with penalty using genetic algorithm

Contents. Making Sense of Statistics 00 Getting Personal: Factors that Modify Your Risk 00 It s a Numbers Game 00

Tutorial. Identification of Variants Using GATK. Sample to Insight. November 21, 2017

A Comparison of Modeling Scales in Flexible Parametric Models. Noori Akhtar-Danesh, PhD McMaster University

Updates and Errata for Statistical Data Analytics (1st edition, 2015)

Medical Information. Objectives 3/9/2016. Literature Search : PubMed. Know. Evaluation 2. Medical informatics Literature search : PubMed PICO Approach

Synoptic Reporting in Tumor Pathology Advantages of a Web-Based System

Objectives. Literature Search : PubMed. Know. Evaluation. Medical informatics Literature search : PubMed PICO Approach

PhD: a web database application for phenotype data management

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * **

stepwisecm: Stepwise Classification of Cancer Samples using High-dimensional Data Sets

Hybridization of Genetic Algorithm and Linear Programming for Solving Cell Formation Problem with Alternative Process Routings

PAKISTAN HOW TO SPEED UP THE INTRODUCTION OF EHEALTH SERVICES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Genetic Algorithm for Finding Shortest Path in a Network

Resampling Methods. Levi Waldron, CUNY School of Public Health. July 13, 2016

esprat Guide (electronic Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool)

SPS Graduate Program Curricula

EBHC International Library

!" # $ % & $ '$ !" #$% & '( "88, A *? #&( ) .!" # " $%&' ( ) * +, -.# / $ Stepwise linear discriminate analysis

RADIOMICS: potential role in the clinics and challenges

Estimating survival from Gray s flexible model. Outline. I. Introduction. I. Introduction. I. Introduction

JeffTrial Subject Registration Clinical Coordinator Training. Kimmel Cancer Center JeffTrials version 13.0 Ver. 1.2

In cloud computing, IaaS approach is to

A Novel Hyper-Active Algorithm to Estimate Missing Microarray Attributes

The partial Package. R topics documented: October 16, Version 0.1. Date Title partial package. Author Andrea Lehnert-Batar

Stepwise: Stepwise Classification of Cancer Samples using Clinical and Molecular Data

Are We Integrating Biologic Advances in Multiple Myeloma Into Clinical Practice?

Searching the Cochrane Library

Introduction to Systems Biology II: Lab

Class Prediction Methods Applied to Microarray Data for Classification

Model-based Recursive Partitioning for Subgroup Analyses

Office of Human Research

Information retrieval Database researches and teaching staff and students at the Charité

Introduction to The Cochrane Library

INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER 150, cours Albert Thomas, Lyon Cedex 08, France

Tutorial. Identification of somatic variants in a matched tumor-normal pair. Sample to Insight. November 21, 2017

An informatics framework for testing data integrity and correctness of federated biomedical databases.

User Manual. Ver. 3.0 March 19, 2012

Site Specific Data Items (SSDI)

Information Services & Systems. The Cochrane Library. An introductory guide. Sarah Lawson Information Specialist (NHS Support)

WISER. Protocol Creation, Activation, and Management TRAINING MANUAL. Wake Integrated Solution for Enterprise Research. For Oncology Studies

TRIP: Turning Research Into Practice. Training Guide 8

Quality Improvement of Liver Ultrasound Images Using Fuzzy Techniques

FCDS IDEA USER ACCOUNT Page 1 2. FACILITY ACCESS ADMINISTRATOR (FAA) Page 3 5. FCDS ABSTRACTOR CODE Page 6 9

The Process of the Literature Review: Searching & Managing the Literature

High Value Reports in HCT Status Update Feb 2016

Instructions for Using the ACG Mobile App

Introduction Data processing plan Data Dissemination Data Storage Sharing Census data Conclusion

Medical Visualization: Visualizing the Invisible. Noeska Smit UiB Dept. of Informatics

NOTICE: This is the author s version of a work that was accepted for publication

Semi-automatic detection of Gd-DTPA-saline filled capsules for colonic transit time assessment in MRI

Nursing Reference Center Plus - Overview -

Calculating measures of biological interaction

Statistics (STAT) Statistics (STAT) 1. Prerequisites: grade in C- or higher in STAT 1200 or STAT 1300 or STAT 1400

Keep Current with Health Science Literature Create a Subject or Journal Alerts with My NCBI

A fast breast nonlinear elastography reconstruction technique using the Veronda-Westman model

Biomedical Genomics Workbench APPLICATION BASED MANUAL

Using topic map standard to deploy a knowledge repository of melanoma case images for diagnosis support

USER MANUAL VP PLANNING

REDCap User Guide 3 Entering Patient Data on REDCap

On Demand Phenotype Ranking through Subspace Clustering

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Stakeholder Feedback on a pcodr Expert Review Committee Initial Recommendation (Manufacturer)

Quality of information on the Internet for Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Tumor Recognition in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy Images

ARES: Advanced Networking for Distributing Genomic Data. Gianluca Reali University of Perugia

USER MANUAL VP PLANNING

SPS Graduate Program Curricula

BaseSpace Variant Interpreter Release Notes

Finding the evidence: how to get the most from your searching

International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research. (IJAER) 2018, Vol. No. 15, Issue No. VI, June e-issn: , p-issn:

Joint CI-JAI advanced accelerator lecture series Imaging and detectors for medical physics Lecture 1: Medical imaging

Huntington s Disease and Vertex Pharmaceuticals

Genetic Programming. Charles Chilaka. Department of Computational Science Memorial University of Newfoundland

Data Mining in Bioinformatics: Study & Survey

Field Searching: Focus on EBSCOhost

MeSH : A Thesaurus for PubMed

Effective Medical Writing

Subgroup identification for dose-finding trials via modelbased recursive partitioning

Learning Pit Pattern Concepts for Gastroenterological Training

Pancreatic cancer in adults:

In order to mine data. P. Pearl O Rourke, MD Partners HealthCare Boston, MA

Searching NHS Evidence

Transcription:

> >>?> @ >> @ 44 40 > <89? < @? <20 @?@> Original Article?> @?>? @>@? @ @>??> 4 > >@? 4 3 2 <? > <? < @ >@ < @ 6 5 >?? <? @ @ >> < @? < @??> > < E @> > @ >> 2 @ @ >> < @? < @??> > <?? > @> > @ >> 3 @ @ >> < @? < @??> > <?@ @ @> > < @ @ @ >> < @? < @??> > <?? > @> > < @ 5 @? < @??> > < @ @ >> <? > > 6 @? < @??> > < @ @ >> <> >?> @ >?@. > @?> @> @ > @? @>@? @ 4 @ :@ @ @>??> 4 > @> @? < > @ >?> @. > >>?> @? @? @? > @ >.>?> @?>? @>@? @? 60 @?>? @>@? @? 6 2 < -?> :??@? @> > @> @? @??> > 383-387 @ @ >. Log rank @?> @ >?@> @?@??> @> > @>>> @? > () @>?>?.? < >. >? @ >?> @> > @>? > >? @ 82/5?>? > >?> > @> > <> @?>> @ > @>?>>?> @?> @@ @> 4 > :?>??>?> @ @>??>. (p=0/044)?> 56/4 >>? > @@?> @ >?>.(p=0/038) (%95CI=/06-8/) 2/93? @>?> >>? > @>.> >> >?> > @> >>> @ >. >? >?> < > @ :@. > >>? >? @?>? @>@??> @. @ <()?>? @>@? @ <?>? @>@? @ <> :@ @ E>@?. @>>> @ >?> >? 46?>.() @ > @ @? @?> @ @> >?> @ >??> @ (0000?> 7) @ >? @ 5000 @ @> @ > @> > > >?>?@ @? >? >.> > @ 680 @ @? 450 @ 30 <384 @?>.(2) > @ > @ @?> @ @ @ @>? @>@? @ 300 >@ @ @ @. @ >?>? @?> @ @ < @??> > < @ @ >> <@> :@ @??>> (email: mah_haghighi@hotmail.com) 388/3/20 :?>? 388/7/30 :??

4 /@>? @ @ @? @ >> >?@ @?> @ >? @ < @ - @ >?> > @ @ @ @? 387 >?@ 383 @ @ > @> @ @ > @ @ @? @ @??> @ @ @ @ @ @ @? @ @ >@?> > > > @ @ @ @ @ @ > @ > > @ >?>. @ > > 2?>.? <> >?> @ @ > Bethesda @ @ @ @ >@ 60 <>> > @ @ 6 @?>?>? @>@? @ @@ @?> @?> < @ > >? @ @ @ >.? @ @>@? @ @ >> > @? @ @@ > @@ > @> @@ @ @@ @@?> () @@?> @ >. @ @> @ > 2002 @ @?> (Bethesda guidelines) :?>?. @ 50?>. @ > @?> @? @?? >.2 60?> @@ (MSI-H). >>? @ @?> @@ @ @@??> @?> @@.3. >>?> @ @@> @?> @ @ @?> @ > @.4. >? > @>> @ @ @ @ > @ @>?> @ @ @ > @ @> > @.5?> @@ @? @? @>@? @.() >? > @> > @?> @ > @ @ < @?>? @ @ @> @ > @ @ @ >??>?>? >? >> >. @ @?> >>? > >?> @> > < < @ < @ @ @??>??> >? @. @ > > @? @? @ <@??> @ @ @> @ @ @? @> > @>?.? @>@? @ @?> @? >> > @? >?>?> @? > >.> @?> @ >> > @ @ @ @ @ @?> @ @ @ @ @ >? @ @>? @ > @ @ @>? > @?. > @ @@?@??> @> @@ > @@ > @@ @ @@ @@. @@ >? @ Log-Rank @?> @? (Kaplan-Meier) > @>. @ > > @> 89? @? 20 @?@> @ > < @ > @>>> @ >?> @> > > >>??@ @? >? >?> 8/ @> >?@ @> @> >?>> @ @ @ @ @ @?> @?> 7/5 @?> @?> @>?@ @ <> @ @ @ > @. @? @ @>>?> @? @>@? @ >.(3) > > > @> > @> >. > > @> @? @.> @ @ @?> @?>? @> @ >? @@@@@ @> @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@@@?> (Hereidatary Non Polyposis Colorectal FAP (Familial Adenomatous Polyposis) @ Cancer) 20 @ @ @ @?> >?> @ @?> 80 @. @?> 5-0 <@ @ @ >?> @?> @?>.(4) >??> @ @? @ < @ > >?> @ >? < @ @?> < @>) @??> @? @?@ @ >?> @?>?> 2/6 (? @ > > < @?>. @ > @@? @??> @>?> 4/ @ @>>?>? > @?@ >?>?>?> 7/9 @?> 7/7 >?>.(5) > @ > @? @ @>>?> @ @ @ @ @ @ <>?> @??> @ @ @ @ > @. @ >@>>> @ >? @> > @ @ @ @? > @>>> @ > @? <@? > @ @?.(6<7) >?>>? @?? >?> @ > @ >? @ Henry Lynch > <996 @?> @> @ @ > @ > @ @ @? @>? @>@? @ @ > @ @ @ @ @ @.(8) @ @ @ @? >? @>@? @??> @ >. > Lynch @? >? @? @?>? @>@? @ >? @ <> >?.> @ @ @ @ > @ @> @? >> @ @>?> FAP.> @ @?> >?? @ @>@? @ @ @ @ @ @?> 5-0 > @ @ @ > @ <>?>> @ @E @ @>? @ @ @ @ @ @?> @ @ @? >?>@ @ >.(9<0). > > @ @ @ > @ @ @ @ > @> @ >? > @>? @?> > @ @ @ @>??> > @> @ > >@ @? @>@? @?>? =

?> @?>? @>@? @ @>??> 4 > > @ @> @ >@?> @?>? @>@? @.(2 @@ ) >?>> > @ @> > @ @>? > @? - @@ p-value (?>) >> > @? 0/43 ( 49/6) 60 > ( 50/4) 6 @? @? 0/298 ( 65/3) 79 < 50 ( 22/3) 27 64-50 ( 2/4) 5 > 65 @??> 0/64 ( 7/3) 2 ( 30/6) 37 ( 52/) 63 >? @ 0/845 ( 76/9) 93 @ ( 23/) 28 @? @? 0/044 ( 50/4) 6 >>? > ( 49/6) 60 @ @ @ @ @>? @?> @ > @? -2 @@ @?> @> > @? p-value > @? * 0/064 (0/94-9/90) 3/ 04 @??> 0/5 ( 0/47-4/57) / 46 -- > @? 0/038 ( /06-8/) 2/ 93 >>? > -- * %95 @> @> > >> >> > Cox?> @ > >>?> @ >> @ /42 ) @@ @ @@? @ @@?> @ @@ > @@ > @@ (P-value) @ @ >?>. @> > (Regression @ > > @?>?>> @> 0/05. 3 > @ SPSS?> @>? @.???> >@?> @> > 2 >?> (@ @ 78-22 @ >> @ ) @ @ 47/25±2/9 @ @ @? @@ @@ @>? @@ @ @@. @@ > @@ @> @@ @ @@ 53/59 ±4/35 @@?> @ @@ 44/33±0/74 @ > @ > @ @?>? @ @>@? @ @ @ @ @>? >> @ > @ > > >?>> >@ > >.(P=0/008) @ @ > @ > > @ @>? @?>.> @ @ @ 50 @? >> @ > @ @? @ > @ >?> < @ > @ @?>? @ @>?>> (?> 85) 5 < @ 42 @?> @ @? @ @ @ >> >?> @ >.(P=0/035) @ >>? @ @ @?> ( @?> 68/9) @ @>? @ > @>?> >? @?>> >@ @?> @?>> @ >@ @ @.(?>> ) >>> @ >>? > @ @? @ @ @?> < @? @ < @.( @@ ) @ > @@??> > @>?>? @ @ @ @> @? @>@? @?> @ @ > >? @. >? @ @ @>>> > >.> > >? @>@? @ @> @ > @?> @ @ @ > @ @>? > @> > >. >?>? >? @?? > ( @ ) @ -?>> @? @ @ >?> @>?>> @?@??> @.(2) @ @? @ >?>@ < > 0/25?> @?> <>?> @ > @??>?> @ >>> @

43 /@>? @ @ 89? @? 20 @?@> @ @ @>? @ >>> @ > > @@ @ > @ @ @ @ > @>?>>?> @ @ @ > @> @>??> @ @>?> @ > @ <>?>> < @ > >?> @ >>? > >?>?> >? > @> @ >.(8) > @ @ >> > >?>? @ > @?> @ @ @ @ > @ @ >> >> > @ @ @ > @ @ @> @ @ < >@> @? @ > @ @??@?> > <?@?> > >?> @?> @ @ @ @ @ @?> @ > @?. > >?> > @>?> @ @> @ @> @ @ @ > > > >> @ > @ @ @?>? @ @>@? @ @ >> >?> >?> @ @??>? @>@? @?> @ @ @ @ >> @ >?> > @ > @ > @> @ @ >? @ > @ @ @ > >? @>@? @ >? > @ @ E @ @ @?@ @ @ @? @?> @ @ >.? @>@? @ @ @? 77 @>> @?> @ 78/4 @ @??> @ 3/5 > @ < @ @ >?> @ @ > @ @ @ @?>> @ > @ @ @@ @?> @ @ @ @ @ >.(NS) @ < @ >?? < > @ @ > > >?> @>? @ > > @ > @ @ @ @?>>??> > @?.(9) @ @ @ @ @> @ @.> >@ @>?>> > @ > @ @?>? @ @ @>? @ @ > @ >?> @ @>? @ @ @?> @ @>?> >? >? < > @ > @ @>? @> > @?> > @ @ > @ @. @ @?> @ @ @? @?@> @?>?> @ @ > @>? @ > @ @ @ > @ >? @??>. >? >?> < @ @? >>? @ >> @ > @>??> > @ @. >>? @ @? DNA @ @?> @ >? > > E > <> @ @ @ @ > @ >@ @ @ >. @ > >@ @ >>? @ >. > E >> @ @? >@ > @ @ @>? @ @ 4 > @ @ >>> @ @ > > @ (%56/4) >>? @ > >?>?> (?> 82/5) @> @ @ >? @ @ @> @ >.(P=0/044) @> @ @ >>> @?> @>?. > @> @ @ @?> 65 @>? @ @> @ @ @ 5 > @ @ @ >? > > @ @ >?> 44 >>? > @>? < @ @ @ > @?> @ > @> @@.(3) >>>?> @ @ @>? @?> @ > @ @ >>> @ @ @@ > @@.(4) @@ > @@ >>? @@ > @>? @@ @@ @@ @ > @ <>>> @ @ >? @ @ @ @>?> @> @ > @ @> @ @ @?> 55/2 @> 5 > @> @ @ @> @ @ @ @ @ >?> 42/5 >>? >.(5) > >@ @?> > @?> @ >? @>? @ >@ @ @?>? < >?>.>?> @ @? @ @ @ @ >??> >@ >.> @. > @ > @ @> (Grad of Tumor)??>?> @ @ @ @ @ > @?> > @> @.>?> @ > @>? @ > @ @ @ @? @?> > >?>> @ @ > > @?> @ @ >.>?> @ @? @?> @ @>>> @ >?>?>.(6) @ @ @ @ @ >. > >> > > @@? @ @ > >? @??> >>> @ @ @ >. @? @>@? @ @>? @> @??> @?.>?>> > >?> < @ @ @ > @ @ >>??> >?> > @?> @? @ @ @?> @ @ @>>> @ @ @@ @ @? @?> @ @ > @@?> @ @ @ @@@ @ @ > @?> @ @?> <>?>> @? @ > > @? >> @ @? @ @> @ >.(7) > >??>?> @ @ @>>> REFERENCES. Aaltonen LA, Salovaara R, Kristo P. Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. N Engl J Med 998; 338: 48 87.

?> @?>? @>@? @ @>??> 4 > > >>?> @ >> @ /44 2. Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Office of Deputy Minister for Health Center for Disease Control, Cancer Office. Iranian annual national cancer registration report, 2005 2006. Tehran: Iranian Center for Disease Control; 2006. 3. Cancer Office of Deputy Minister for Health Center for disease control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian annual national cancer registration report, 2005: Tehran: Iranian Center for Disease Control; 2007. 4. Naccarati A, Pardini B, Hemminki K, Vodicka P. Sporadic colorectal cancer and individual susceptibility: a review of the association studies investigating the role of DNA repair genetic polymorphisms. Mutat Res 2007; 635: 8 45. 5. Boyle P, Langman JS. ABC of colorectal cancer. Epidemiology. BMJ 2000; 32: 805-808. 6. Roncucci L, Fante R, Losi L, Di Gregorio C, Micheli A, Benatti P, et al. Survival for colon and rectal cancer in a population based cancer registry. Eur J Cancer 995; 32A: 295. 7. Marie RG, Erik JB, Robert JC, Robert WB, Josep LM. Predictors of survival after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 987; 60: 238. 8. Nishisho I, Nakamura Y, Miyosshi Y. Mutation of chromosome 5q2 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science 99; 253: 665 69. 9. Lynch HT, Smyrk TC, Watson P. Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposiscolorectal cancer: an updated review. Gastroenterology 993; 04: 535 49. 0. Lynch HT, Smirk TC. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome): updated review. Cancer 996; 78: 49 67.. Piñol V, Castells A, Andreu M, Castellví-Bel S, Alenda C, Llor X, et al. Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. JAMA 2005; 293: 2028-30. 2. Kleinbaum D, Kupper L, eds. Applied regression analysis another multivariable methods. st edition. Boston: Duxburg; 978. p.88 209. 3. Sankila R, Aaltonen LA, Jarvinen HJ. Better survival rates in patients with MLH-associated hereditary colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 996; 0: 682-87. 4. Elsakov P, K Urtinaitis J. Survival from colorectal carcinoma in families as compared to the general population in Lithuania-initial results. Fam Cancer 2006; 5: 369-7. 5. Percesepe A, Benatti P, Roncucci L. Survival analysis in families affected by hereditary non polyposis colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 997; 7: 373-76. 6. Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R, Newland RC, Pheils MT, Smyth E, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg 985; 72: 698. 7. Moghimi-Dehkordi B, Safaee A, Zali MR. Prognostic factors in,38 Iranian colorectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008 ; 7: 683-88. 8. Aarnio M, Mecklin JP, Aaltonen LA. Life-time risk of different cancers in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer () syndrome. Int J Cancer 995; 64: 430 33. 9. Hosseninasab AR, Modir Abbas, Shir yazdi SM. Survival analysis of colorectal cancers, Yazd, 98-2000. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science 2002; 9: 23-29. [In Persian]