Protecting Future Access Now Models for Preserving Locally Created Content

Similar documents
Preservation Standards (& Specifications) (&& Best Practices)

DIGITAL STEWARDSHIP SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FORM

Addressing the E-Journal Preservation Conundrum: Understanding Portico

Libraries and Disaster Recovery

DRS Update. HL Digital Preservation Services & Library Technology Services Created 2/2017, Updated 4/2017

Introduction to Digital Preservation. Danielle Mericle University of Oregon

Copyright 2008, Paul Conway.

Importance of cultural heritage:

Can a Consortium Build a Viable Preservation Repository?

Conducting a Self-Assessment of a Long-Term Archive for Interdisciplinary Scientific Data as a Trustworthy Digital Repository

An overview of the OAIS and Representation Information

Developing a Research Data Policy

GETTING STARTED WITH DIGITAL COMMONWEALTH

The e-depot in practice. Barbara Sierman Digital Preservation Officer Madrid,

The OAIS Reference Model: current implementations

File Format Considerations in the Preservation of e- Books

Different Aspects of Digital Preservation

Susan Thomas, Project Manager. An overview of the project. Wellcome Library, 10 October

Trusted Digital Repositories. A systems approach to determining trustworthiness using DRAMBORA

ISO Self-Assessment at the British Library. Caylin Smith Repository

BUILDING A NEW DIGITAL LIBRARY FOR THE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF AUSTRALIA

The National Bibliographic Knowledgebase

RUtgers COmmunity REpository (RUcore)

Digital preservation activities at the German National Library nestor / kopal

Building for the Future

Data Curation Handbook Steps

Protection of the National Cultural Heritage in Austria

DRS Policy Guide. Management of DRS operations is the responsibility of staff in Library Technology Services (LTS).

SNHU Academic Archive Policies

Emory Libraries Digital Collections Steering Committee Policy Suite

UNCLASSIFIED. Mimecast UK Archiving Service Description

DRI: Dr Aileen O Carroll Policy Manager Digital Repository of Ireland Royal Irish Academy

University of British Columbia Library. Persistent Digital Collections Implementation Plan. Final project report Summary version

Institutional Repository using DSpace. Yatrik Patel Scientist D (CS)

Digital Preservation DMFUG 2017

Woodson Research Center Digital Preservation Policy

Fedora Commons: Taking on the Challenge of the Next Generation of Scholarly Communication

Draft Digital Preservation Policy for IGNCA. Dr. Aditya Tripathi Banaras Hindu University Varanasi

Brown University Libraries Technology Plan

Better skilled workforce

Building on to the Digital Preservation Foundation at Harvard Library. Andrea Goethals ABCD-Library Meeting June 27, 2016

Digits Fugit or. Preserving Digital Materials Long Term. Chris Erickson - Brigham Young University

DRI: Preservation Planning Case Study Getting Started in Digital Preservation Digital Preservation Coalition November 2013 Dublin, Ireland

Appendix B SUBSCRIPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Addendum to British Columbia Electronic Library Network Electronic Products License Agreement

Digital Preservation Efforts at UNLV Libraries

7.3. In t r o d u c t i o n to m e t a d a t a

Preserving Electronic Mailing Lists as Scholarly Resources: The H-Net Archives

Post Digitization: Challenges in Managing a Dynamic Dataset. Jasper Faase, 12 April 2012

Long Term Digital Preserva2on

PRESERVING DIGITAL OBJECTS

Ex Libris Rosetta A Complete Digital Asset Management and Preservation System

UC Office of the President ipres 2009: the Sixth International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects

Digital Preservation Platform

NRF Open Access Statement Impact Survey

The Need for a Terminology Bridge. May 2009

What do you do when your file formats become obsolete? Lydia T. Motyka Florida Center for Library Automation USETDA 2011

Assessment of product against OAIS compliance requirements

UNT Libraries TRAC Audit Checklist

Preservation and Access of Digital Audiovisual Assets at the Guggenheim

Preservation. Policy number: PP th March Table of Contents

OneUConn IT Service Delivery Vision

Promoting Open Standards for Digital Repository. case study examples and challenges

MAPPING STANDARDS! FOR RICHER ASSESSMENTS. Bertram Lyons AVPreserve Digital Preservation 2014 Washington, DC

Collection Policy. Policy Number: PP1 April 2015

Using JSTOR. September 2014

Scientific Research Data Management Policy

Igitur Archive: Institutional Repository Utrecht University. May , Martin Slabbertje

Evolving the digital library for digital scholarship enablement

The Canadian Information Network for Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

STRATEGIC PLAN

Robin Dale RLG

Defining Economic Models for Digital Libraries :

Applying Archival Science to Digital Curation: Advocacy for the Archivist s Role in Implementing and Managing Trusted Digital Repositories

NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY

New Zealand Government IBM Infrastructure as a Service

Working with a Preservation Software Vendor - The Kentucky Experience Glen McAninch

Conch Appendix: Discovery Questionnaire. Questionnaire Summary

Scholarly collaboration platforms

ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Overview. Austin McLean and Marlene Coles CGS Summer Workshop, July 2017

Safe Havens in a Choppy Sea:

What steps to take. when AV is yet to become a priority for your organisation

Digital Preservation Policy for the PFA Library and Film Study Center. Paul Grammatico. San Jose State University

Implementation of the Data Seal of Approval

The role of PIONIER network in long term preservation services for cultural heritage institutions in Poland

Working with Islandora

Digital Preservation at NARA

Digital Preservation with Special Reference to the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model: An Overview

Agenda. Bibliography

Data management Backgrounds and steps to implementation; A pragmatic approach.

Lessons from the implementation

International Implementation of Digital Library Software/Platforms 2009 ASIS&T Annual Meeting Vancouver, November 2009

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (QIP) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEGREE PROGRAM

Digital Preservation in Theory and in Practice

Preserving repository content: practical steps for repository managers

Metadata Sharing Policy

Defining OAIS requirements by Deconstructing the OAIS Reference Model Date last revised: August 28, 2005

The library s role in promoting the sharing of scientific research data

SNIA 100 Year Archive Survey 2017 Thomas Rivera, CISSP

State Government Digital Preservation Profiles

Using JSTOR. May 2016

Transcription:

Protecting Future Access Now Models for Preserving Locally Created Content By Amy Kirchhoff Archive Service Product Manager, Portico, ITHAKA Amigos Online Conference Digital Preservation: What s Now, What s Next August 12, 2011

Amy Kirchhoff Archive Service Product Manager Portico, JSTOR amy.kirchhoff@ithaka.org 609-986-2218 2

ITHAKA is a not-for-profit organization that helps the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways. We pursue this mission by providing innovative services that aid in the adoption of these technologies and that create lasting impact. 3

Ithaka S+R is a research and consulting service that focuses on the transformation of scholarship and teaching in an online environment, with the goal of identifying the critical issues facing our community and acting as a catalyst for change. JSTOR is a research platform that enables discovery, access, and preservation of scholarly content. Portico is a digital preservation service for e- journals, e-books, and other scholarly e-content. 4

Over 2,000 societies, and associations have committed content to Portico through 132 publishers agreements.» E-journal titles 12,204» E-book titles 107,117» D-collections 45 5

6 ANYONE CAN BE A PUBLISHER

The NEH and IMLS awarded a grant to Portico, in partnership with Cornell University Library, through the Advancing Knowledge: The IMLS/NEH Digital Partnership grant program to develop a practical model for how preservation can be accomplished for digital content at cultural heritage organizations. White Paper: http://www.portico.org/presentations-publications/ 7

A Preservation Model some metadata some files digital song some metadata some files digital slide some metadata some files digital journal article some metadata some files digital book 8

JISC Digitisation Programme: Preservation Study Portico Locally Created Content Study Many thanks to JISC and NEH for funding. 9

Reasonable Preservation Questions The IT department backs up the server, is that sufficient? We make a tape backup every 3 months, are we covered? The high resolution master files are on an external drive in Joe s office, is that OK? Can we keep this collection safe without preserving it? What will make this digital collection safe enough? 10

Reasonable Preservation Questions IT DEPENDS 11

Reasonable Preservation Questions No Action Backup Byte Replication Full Managed Preservation No Protection Near-Term Protection Mid-Term Protection Long-Term Protection CONTENT PROTECTION CONTINUUM 12

Reasonable Preservation Questions No Action Backup Byte Replication Full Managed Preservation CONTENT PROTECTION CONTINUUM II 13

Digital preservation is the series of management policies and activities necessary to ensure the enduring usability, authenticity, discoverability, and accessibility of content over the very long-term. The key goals of digital preservation include: Usability Authenticity Discoverability Accessibility the intellectual content of the item must remain usable via the delivery mechanism of current technology the provenance of the content must be proven and the content an authentic replica of the original the content must have logical bibliographic metadata so that it can be found by end users through time the content must be available for use to the appropriate community FULL MANAGED DIGITAL PRESERVATION 14

ANALYSIS FROM THE STUDIES 15

Survey Analysis Ephemera / Special Collections Photographs Art / Tech Slides ETDs Books Course Materials Oral Histories Campus Publications Institutional Records Working/Tech Papers Datasets Journals Newspapers Websites Primary Source Video Preprints / articles Music Audio 16 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% DIGITAL CONTENT CONSIDERED IN STUDIES

Survey Analysis The 27 institutions, and at least 30 projects, reviewed were using: 36 distinct pieces of software 94 instances of software 3.13 pieces of content management software, on average 17

Survey Analysis Repository System File Servers Local Delivery Systems Catalog Systems Preservation Systems Audio/Visual Systems Third Party Delivery Systems Image Repository System Journal Delivery System Search Tools 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 COUNT OF INDIVIDUAL INSTANCES OF TYPES OF SYSTEMS IN USE ACROSS ALL ORGANIZATIONS 18

Survey Analysis 19

Survey Analysis 20

Survey Analysis Institutions with InterInstitutional Collaborations Institutions with IntraInstitutional Collaborations Without 37% Without 43% With 63% With 57% COLLABORATION 21

Survey Analysis With 7% Without 93% INSTITUTIONS WITH AND WITHOUT PRESERVATION POLICIES 22

Survey Analysis Additional Themes The size of a cultural heritage organization is neither a predictor for risk nor amount or quality of digital content. Many cultural heritage organizations do not have staff to support either preservation or access systems in-house. Cultural heritage organizations would benefit from a turn-key solution that provides both access and preservation for a large variety of formats and content types. Cultural heritage organizations do not often have a sustainability plan associated with their digital content. The digital content is not considered a product that must be sustained, it is considered another outlet for their special collections. 23

INITIAL STEPS TO PROTECT CONTENT 24

Initial Steps to Protect Content 1 Locate all content 2 3 Initiate regular backups Test retrieval from backups 4 Develop a long-term preservation plan 25

Initial Steps to Protect Content PRESERVATION (OR PROTECTION) PLANNING 1 2 3 4 5 Who: Identify the key players involved with long-term preservation of the targeted content What: Describe or characterize the collection and content Where: Document the locations of all the copies of the content and metadata. When: Document the targeted preservation timeframe and impact of loss. How: Document how the key content management and preservation tasks will occur. 26

Survey Analysis Collection Management Content Management 27

Initial Steps to Protect Content Disaster Recovery User Error Recovery WHY BACKUP? 28

Initial Steps to Protect Content CALCULATING A BACKUP SOLUTION 1 1 2 29

Initial Steps to Protect Content CALCULATING A BACKUP SOLUTION 1 1 2 1 11.33 3 11.58 51.09 28 2 30

31 PRESERVATION

A Preservation Model OAIS An Open Archival Information System Participates In Preservation Planning Participates In Descriptive Information Descriptive Information SIP Ingest Data Management Access Queries Result Sets Orders Producer AIP Archival Storage AIP DIP Consumer Participates In Administration Participates In 32 Management

A Preservation Model Preservation planning Users query & deliver automated or manual export for reprocessing deposit & update Archive Delivery Content receipt Content Receipt Processing & archival deposit Processing and Reprocessing Update, reprocessing & migration Archive management Content export 33 Local Backup Cloud Storage Backup

Content export Update, reprocessing & migration A Preservation Model for Preservation planning Preservation Service Archive management Content receipt Processing & archival deposit Cultural Heritage Organizations 34

A Preservation Model Will the software meet your input throughput needs? Will it meet your batch or otherwise loading needs? Will the software meet your output throughput needs? SELECTING SOFTWARE How complicated is the software to manage? Do you have appropriate staff to both install the software and maintain it over time? Will the software capture the preservation metadata you have identified as necessary in your policies? Can the software support maintaining the original master versions of your content files and the web-ready versions of your content files side-by-side with the metadata for the files? Can the software export the original master version of your content files with the metadata for those files? How much does the software cost initially? Consider both internal costs such as staff time and external costs. How much will it cost to maintain? Consider both internal costs such as staff time and external costs such as licensing fees. 35

A Preservation Model COMMUNITY MONITORING the community of file format experts the community of preservation experts your content provider community your designated user community 36

A Preservation Model limit limit the types of formats allowed in the collection to those with a proven long-life migrate migrate files in troublesome formats to new formats both accept all file formats, but through written policies, assign different preservation commitments to different types of files CONTENT FORMATS 37

A Preservation Model PRESERVATION POLICIES 38

A Preservation Model METADATA & PACKAGING 39

A Preservation Model METADATA & PACKAGING PACKAGING 40

A Preservation Model METADATA & PACKAGING PACKAGING & PRESERVATION METADATA 41

A Preservation Model PACKAGING PRESERVATION METADATA METS DIDL PREMIS OAI-ORE 42

A Preservation Model Access rights are not preservation rights Get preservation rights at the point of deposit Document preservation rights in the preservation metadata Tricky area embedded content Tricky area research and privacy rights RIGHTS 43

A Preservation Model Start Up Annual COSTS 44

A Preservation Model Allowing sponsorship of the collection Permitting advertising on the collection RECOVERING COSTS Encouraging donations to support the collection Building an endowment Creating premium services for purchase, the revenues from which can subsidize the preservation service. Enlisting support from funding bodies, scholarly and professional societies, and publishers Charging for access to the collection and using the revenue to subsidize the preservation costs. Charging for participation in the preservation service 45 Relying upon support from a parent organization or government

A Preservation Model Do-It-Yourself Collaboration Third Party Preservation Service ORGANIZATIONAL MODEL 46

Content export Update, reprocessing & migration A Preservation Model for Preservation planning Preservation Service Archive management Content receipt Processing & archival deposit Cultural Heritage Organizations 47

THANK YOU. Amy Kirchhoff amy.kirchhoff@ithaka.org http://www.portico.org