Basics of treatment planning II

Similar documents
Basics of treatment planning II

ELECTRON DOSE KERNELS TO ACCOUNT FOR SECONDARY PARTICLE TRANSPORT IN DETERMINISTIC SIMULATIONS

Basic Radiation Oncology Physics

Transitioning from pencil beam to Monte Carlo for electron dose calculations

Electron Dose Kernels (EDK) for Secondary Particle Transport in Deterministic Simulations

Proton dose calculation algorithms and configuration data

A SYSTEM OF DOSIMETRIC CALCULATIONS

GPU Based Convolution/Superposition Dose Calculation

Release Notes for Dosimetry Check with Convolution-Superposition Collapsed Cone Algorithm (CC)

Monte Carlo methods in proton beam radiation therapy. Harald Paganetti

Photon beam dose distributions in 2D

Introduction to Biomedical Imaging

Photon Dose Algorithms and Physics Data Modeling in modern RTP

15 Dose Calculation Algorithms

Accuracy of treatment planning calculations for conformal radiotherapy van 't Veld, Aart Adeodatus

Calculation algorithms in radiation therapy treatment planning systems

Monitor Unit (MU) Calculation

Ch. 4 Physical Principles of CT

Dose Distributions. Purpose. Isodose distributions. To familiarize the resident with dose distributions and the factors that affect them

EXTERNAL PHOTON BEAMS: PHYSICAL ASPECTS

Central Slice Theorem

Investigation of tilted dose kernels for portal dose prediction in a-si electronic portal imagers

Effects of the difference in tube voltage of the CT scanner on. dose calculation

Dose Calculations: Where and How to Calculate Dose. Allen Holder Trinity University.

gpmc: GPU-Based Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for Proton Radiotherapy Xun Jia 8/7/2013

SYSTEM LINEARITY LAB MANUAL: 2 Modifications for P551 Fall 2013 Medical Physics Laboratory

Influence of electron density spatial distribution and X-ray beam quality during CT simulation on dose calculation accuracy

Dosimetry Simulations with the UF-B Series Phantoms using the PENTRAN-MP Code System

An Investigation of a Model of Percentage Depth Dose for Irregularly Shaped Fields

Loma Linda University Medical Center Dept. of Radiation Medicine

Analysis of Radiation Transport through Multileaf Collimators Using BEAMnrc Code

Verification of dose calculations with a clinical treatment planning system based on a point kernel dose engine

COMPARISON OF DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS FOR LEKSELL GAMMA KNIFE PERFEXION USING MONTE CARLO VOXEL PHANTOMS

REAL-TIME ADAPTIVITY IN HEAD-AND-NECK AND LUNG CANCER RADIOTHERAPY IN A GPU ENVIRONMENT

Automated Image Analysis Software for Quality Assurance of a Radiotherapy CT Simulator

Michael Speiser, Ph.D.

Advantages of multiple algorithm support in treatment planning system for external beam dose calculations

3D DETERMINISTIC RADIATION TRANSPORT FOR DOSE COMPUTATIONS IN CLINICAL PROCEDURES

Digital Scatter Removal in Mammography to enable Patient Dose Reduction

Digital Image Processing

Tomographic Reconstruction

Monte Carlo simulations

DUAL energy X-ray radiography [1] can be used to separate

I Introduction 2. IV Relative dose in electron and photon beams 26 IV.A Dose and kerma per unit incident fluence... 27

Voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo methods applied to internal and external dose calculations.

S. Guru Prasad, Ph.D., DABR

IMSURE QA SOFTWARE FAST, PRECISE QA SOFTWARE

Engineered Diffusers Intensity vs Irradiance

Spectral analysis of non-stationary CT noise

A dedicated tool for PET scanner simulations using FLUKA

Dose Calculation and Optimization Algorithms: A Clinical Perspective

GPU applications in Cancer Radiation Therapy at UCSD. Steve Jiang, UCSD Radiation Oncology Amit Majumdar, SDSC Dongju (DJ) Choi, SDSC

Artifact Mitigation in High Energy CT via Monte Carlo Simulation

CT vs. VolumeScope: image quality and dose comparison

10 MV x - ray scatter dose - spread kernel construction using the Bjarngard scatter

Monte Carlo simulations. Lesson FYSKJM4710 Eirik Malinen

Comparison of internal and external dose conversion factors using ICRP adult male and MEET Man voxel model phantoms.

Design and performance characteristics of a Cone Beam CT system for Leksell Gamma Knife Icon

DOSE-CALCULATION ALGORITHMS USED IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING MANUEL SALGADO FERNÁNDEZ

Machine and Physics Data Guide

Assesing multileaf collimator effect on the build-up region using Monte Carlo method

Evaluation of Spectrum Mismatching using Spectrum Binning Approach for Statistical Polychromatic Reconstruction in CT

Comparison of Predictions by MCNP and EGSnrc of Radiation Dose

2D DOSE MEASUREMENT USING A FLAT PANEL EPID

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

MEDICAL IMAGING 2nd Part Computed Tomography

C a t p h a n / T h e P h a n t o m L a b o r a t o r y

Hidenobu Tachibana The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Radiology Dept. The Cancer Institute of JFCR, Physics Dept.

New Technology in Radiation Oncology. James E. Gaiser, Ph.D. DABR Physics and Computer Planning Charlotte, NC

Tomotherapy Physics. Machine Twinning and Quality Assurance. Emilie Soisson, MS

VALIDATION OF A MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHM FOR CLINICAL ELECTRON BEAMS IN THE PRESENCE OF PHANTOMS WITH COMPLEX HETEROGENEITIES

Image-based Monte Carlo calculations for dosimetry

Geant4 in Brachytherapy

VCU Radiation Oncology

Iterative regularization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy optimization. Carlsson, F. and Forsgren, A. Med. Phys. 33 (1), January 2006.

Spiral CT. Protocol Optimization & Quality Assurance. Ge Wang, Ph.D. Department of Radiology University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA

Medical Image Reconstruction Term II 2012 Topic 6: Tomography

Comparison of absorbed dose distribution 10 MV photon beam on water phantom using Monte Carlo method and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm

Introduction to Medical Imaging. Cone-Beam CT. Klaus Mueller. Computer Science Department Stony Brook University

Implementation of the EGSnrc / BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code - Application to medical accelerator SATURNE43

Development a simple point source model for Elekta SL-25 linear accelerator using MCNP4C Monte Carlo code

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL IMAGING- 3D LOCALIZATION LAB MANUAL 1. Modifications for P551 Fall 2013 Medical Physics Laboratory

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

An Automated Image-based Method for Multi-Leaf Collimator Positioning Verification in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Slide 1. Technical Aspects of Quality Control in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Slide 2. Annual Compliance Testing. of MRI Systems.

Recognition and Measurement of Small Defects in ICT Testing

Code characteristics

UNCOMPROMISING QUALITY

PCRT 3D. Scalable Architecture System. User-Friendly. Traceable. Continuos Development

A prototype table-top inverse-geometry volumetric CT system

Dose Calculation and Verification for Tomotherapy

Medical Imaging BMEN Spring 2016

CLINICAL ASPECTS OF COMPACT GANTRY DESIGNS

Simulation of Diffuse Optical Tomography using COMSOL Multiphysics

Voxels and Medical Applications. FLUKA Beginners course

Integrated proton-photon treatment planning

BME I5000: Biomedical Imaging

An Intuitive Explanation of Fourier Theory

ADVANCING CANCER TREATMENT

Index. aliasing artifacts and noise in CT images, 200 measurement of projection data, nondiffracting

Transcription:

Basics of treatment planning II Sastry Vedam PhD DABR Introduction to Medical Physics III: Therapy Spring 2015 Dose calculation algorithms! Correction based! Model based 1

Dose calculation algorithms! Representation of patient and dose distribution! Block of tissue of uniform density! Contour external surface with solder wire! Contours obtained from CT Dose calculation algorithms! Modern algorithms! 3D point by point/voxel by voxel description of patient (CT)! Spatial reliability of CT (<2%)! Dose uncertainty (photon beams) <1%! Typical CT scan! 50 100 images! 2.5 5 mm slice thickness! 512x512 pixels per imaging plane! 2-16 bytes to store HU value data 2

Dose calculation algorithms! Speed! Processor power! Grid spacing! Non uniform sample spacing within grid! Calculation algorithm Correction based algorithms 3

Dose calculation algorithms! Correction based! Semi empirical! Based on measured data (PDD, Profiles etc.,)! Reference calibration condition! Dose/MU @ a defined location in water phantom for a defined field size! Corrections for:! Attenuation! Contour irregularity! Beam modifiers! Tissue inhomogeneities! Scatter (Scattering volume, field size, shape and radial distance)! Geometry (Non reference SSD/depth) MU Isocentric setup 4

MU Non Isocentric setup Correction based algorithms! Limited accuracy! 3D heterogeneity corrections at tissue interfaces! Lack of complete electronic equilibrium! Secondary check for MUs calculated from more complex model based algorithms 5

Model based algorithms Model based algorithms! Compute dose distribution with a physical model that actually simulates radiation transport through a patient! Radiation transport! Production of megavoltage X-rays in treatment head! Interaction and scattering of photons by Compton Effect! Effects of transport of charged particles near boundaries and tissue heterogeneities 6

Radiation Transport Electron disequilibrium due to greater lateral range of electrons compared to field size Radiation Transport Pencil beam charge particle tracks in phantom 7

Convolution Convolution Energy fluence Energy deposition kernel (Patient density map) Dose 8

Convolution/Superposition! Several variations! Common/essential components! Energy imparted to medium by interactions of primary photons (TERMA)! Energy deposited about a primary interaction site (Kernel)! Kernel! Primary (Primary dose)! First and multiple scatter dose (Can be calculated together or separately)! Kernel also referred to as:! Dose spread array! Differential pencil beam! Point spread function! Energy deposition kernel TERMA! Total energy released per unit mass! Energy imparted to secondary charged particles! Energy retained by scattered photon! Sum of the above should equal energy of the primary photon for each interaction TERMA Mass attenuation coefficient Energy fluence 9

TERMA! Poly energetic nature! Attenuation map for each energy and each depth r from surface! Divergent beam (Inverse square fall off)! Inhomogeneity correction (Geometric vs Radiological depth) TERMA! 3D voxel array with TERMA values is obtained before convolution! Involves:! Array of electron densities from CT slices! Calculating radiological depth for each of the voxels! Calculating TERMA for each voxel 10

Convolution Process! Dose at each point in medium! Primary photon interactions throughout the irradiated volume! Summing dose contributions from each voxel TERMA Primary energy deposition kernel Scatter energy deposition kernel Convolution Process! Convolution can be done by either:! Integrating dose deposited at successive points due to TERMA throughout the medium (Deposition point of view)! Calculating dose contribution throughout the medium due to TERMA at successive interaction points (Interaction point of view) TERMA Primary energy deposition kernel Scatter energy deposition kernel 11

Convolution process Deposition point of view Interaction point of view Convolution process! Deposition point of view! Best if dose is calculated only in a subset of the irradiated volume! TERMA in each voxel must be stored in an array! Interaction point of view! Only a single TERMA value needs to be stored at any time 12

Fourier transform www.betterexplained.com Convolution process: The Fourier Transform! Assuming the kernels are spatially invariant, if the convolution of TERMA with a kernel to obtain dose can be written as,! Fourier transform of the dose is given by, 13

Convolution in Inhomogeneous medium! Kernels are functions of displacement only! In Inhomogeneous media, the fractional energy contribution will depend on both distance between interaction site and deposition site as well as densities at interaction and deposition sites Convolution in Inhomogeneous medium! First approximation! Energy loss by secondary electrons dependent on effective path length (average density through ray tracing)! Incorrect for primary kernel! Electron scattering! No and energy of electrons depends not only on avg density but also on density distribution! Good for scatter kernel! Fluence of onee-scattered photons is proportional to average density! Range of electrons ejected by these photons is very small 14

Convolution in Inhomogeneous medium! Since rate of energy deposition in each voxel is proportional to the density within voxel, kernel value can be obtained by! Substituting into the equation for dose, Variations of convolution! Original Real-Space Convolution (Mackie et al, 1985)! Kernels separated into primary, truncated first scatter (TFS) and residual first and multiple scatter (RFMS) arrays! TFS First scatter dose, relatively close to the interaction site! RFMS Multiple scatter and first scatter not included in TFS! Scatter separation allowed for smaller higher resolution kernel arrays! Average density scaling for a range of densities between interaction and deposition sites for primary and TFS! Avg density of phantom in kernel scaling for RFMS 15

Variations of convolution! Differential pencil beam method (Mohan et al, 1986, Ahnesjo et al., 1987)! Infinitesimal segment of a pencil beam! Equivalent to a convolution kernel except,! Dose deposited in water per unit primary photon collision density, instead of per unit energy imparted by primary photons Variations of convolution! Collapsed cone convolution (Ahnesjo et al., 1989)! Polyenergetic TERMA and kernel! Kernel represented analytically and combines primary and scatter contributions! Functions used to characterize kernel are, 16

Variations of convolution! Collapsed cone convolution (Ahnesjo et al., 1989)! Finite number of polar angles w.r.t. primary beam along which the function is defined! Interaction site apex of a set of radially directed lines spreading out in 3D! Each line is further considered the axis of a cone! Kernel function along each line energy deposited within the entire cone at radius r collapsed onto the line! TERMA is calculated and represented in a cartesian array! Inhomogeneities are accounted for in TERMA array! Reduced computation time when compared to conventional convolution 17