Introduction to Positron Emission Tomography

Similar documents
Introduction to Emission Tomography

Implementation and evaluation of a fully 3D OS-MLEM reconstruction algorithm accounting for the PSF of the PET imaging system

Corso di laurea in Fisica A.A Fisica Medica 5 SPECT, PET

Review of PET Physics. Timothy Turkington, Ph.D. Radiology and Medical Physics Duke University Durham, North Carolina, USA

Emission Computed Tomography Notes

Medical Imaging BMEN Spring 2016

Constructing System Matrices for SPECT Simulations and Reconstructions

Workshop on Quantitative SPECT and PET Brain Studies January, 2013 PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brasil Corrections in SPECT and PET

Positron. MillenniumVG. Emission Tomography Imaging with the. GE Medical Systems

Cherenkov Radiation. Doctoral Thesis. Rok Dolenec. Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Samo Korpar

Conflicts of Interest Nuclear Medicine and PET physics reviewer for the ACR Accreditation program

SPECT QA and QC. Bruce McBride St. Vincent s Hospital Sydney.

8/2/2017. Disclosure. Philips Healthcare (Cleveland, OH) provided the precommercial

Fits you like no other

Fits you like no other

Positron Emission Tomography

Fast Timing and TOF in PET Medical Imaging

3-D PET Scatter Correction

Characterization of a Time-of-Flight PET Scanner based on Lanthanum Bromide

COUNT RATE AND SPATIAL RESOLUTION PERFORMANCE OF A 3-DIMENSIONAL DEDICATED POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) SCANNER

James R Halama, PhD Loyola University Medical Center

Performance Evaluation of radionuclide imaging systems

Continuation Format Page

FRONT-END DATA PROCESSING OF NEW POSITRON EMIS- SION TOMOGRAPHY DEMONSTRATOR

in PET Medical Imaging

REMOVAL OF THE EFFECT OF COMPTON SCATTERING IN 3-D WHOLE BODY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY BY MONTE CARLO

Time-of-Flight Technology

Extremely Fast Detector for 511 kev Gamma

3/27/2012 WHY SPECT / CT? SPECT / CT Basic Principles. Advantages of SPECT. Advantages of CT. Dr John C. Dickson, Principal Physicist UCLH

GPU implementation for rapid iterative image reconstruction algorithm

Image reconstruction for PET/CT scanners: past achievements and future challenges

Evaluation of Centrally Located Sources in. Coincidence Timing Calibration for Time-of-Flight PET

Philips SPECT/CT Systems

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

Diagnostic imaging techniques. Krasznai Zoltán. University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre Department of Biophysics and Cell Biology

BME I5000: Biomedical Imaging

Performance Evaluation of the Philips Gemini PET/CT System

Technological Advances and Challenges: Experience with Time-Of-Flight PET Combined with 3T MRI. Floris Jansen, GE Healthcare July, 2015

Ch. 4 Physical Principles of CT

Validation of GEANT4 for Accurate Modeling of 111 In SPECT Acquisition

C a t p h a n / T h e P h a n t o m L a b o r a t o r y

The great interest shown toward PET instrumentation is

ISO ISO ISO OHSAS ISO

CHAPTER 11 NUCLEAR MEDICINE IMAGING DEVICES

Q.Clear. Steve Ross, Ph.D.

Improvement of contrast using reconstruction of 3D Image by PET /CT combination system

Semi-Quantitative Metrics in Positron Emission Tomography. Michael Adams. Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University.

SUV Analysis of F-18 FDG PET Imaging in the Vicinity of the Bladder. Colleen Marie Allen. Graduate Program in Medical Physics Duke University

Biomedical Imaging. Computed Tomography. Patrícia Figueiredo IST

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Nucl Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 February 9.

Modeling and Incorporation of System Response Functions in 3D Whole Body PET

Identification of Shielding Material Configurations Using NMIS Imaging

SNIC Symposium, Stanford, California April The Hybrid Parallel Plates Gas Counter for Medical Imaging

Introduction to Biomedical Imaging

Image Acquisition Systems

Digital Image Processing

Image Reconstruction Methods for Dedicated Nuclear Medicine Detectors for Prostate Imaging

MOHAMMAD MINHAZ AKRAM THE EFFECT OF SAMPLING IN HISTOGRAMMING AND ANALYTICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF 3D AX-PET DATA

Determination of Three-Dimensional Voxel Sensitivity for Two- and Three-Headed Coincidence Imaging

An educational tool for demonstrating the TOF-PET technique

Assessment of OSEM & FBP Reconstruction Techniques in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Using SPECT Phantom as Applied on Bone Scintigraphy

Computational Medical Imaging Analysis

Nuclear Medicine Imaging

RICE UNIVERSITY. Optimization of Novel Developments in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging. Tingting Chang

Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution

218 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, VOL. 44, NO. 2, APRIL 1997

In-vivo dose verification for particle therapy

Tomographic Reconstruction

664 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, VOL. 52, NO. 3, JUNE 2005

Introduc)on to PET Image Reconstruc)on. Tomographic Imaging. Projec)on Imaging. Types of imaging systems

Multi-slice CT Image Reconstruction Jiang Hsieh, Ph.D.

Motion Correction in PET Image. Reconstruction

ADVANCES IN FLUKA PET TOOLS

Outline. What is Positron Emission Tomography? (PET) Positron Emission Tomography I: Image Reconstruction Strategies

CT NOISE POWER SPECTRUM FOR FILTERED BACKPROJECTION AND ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION

Evaluation of attenuation and scatter correction requirements in small animal PET and SPECT imaging

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS

Principles of PET Imaging. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Fundamental Principles WHAT IS PET?

The Design and Implementation of COSEM, an Iterative Algorithm for Fully 3-D Listmode Data

Basics of treatment planning II

The Effects of PET Reconstruction Parameters on Radiotherapy Response Assessment. and an Investigation of SUV peak Sampling Parameters.

Design and assessment of a novel SPECT system for desktop open-gantry imaging of small animals: A simulation study

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Motion compensation for 4D PET/CT Kruis, M.F. Link to publication

Low-Dose Dual-Energy CT for PET Attenuation Correction with Statistical Sinogram Restoration

Deviceless respiratory motion correction in PET imaging exploring the potential of novel data driven strategies

Impact of X-ray Scatter When Using CT-based Attenuation Correction in PET: A Monte Carlo Investigation

A Comparison of the Uniformity Requirements for SPECT Image Reconstruction Using FBP and OSEM Techniques

USING cone-beam geometry with pinhole collimation,

Detector simulations for in-beam PET with FLUKA. Francesco Pennazio Università di Torino and INFN, TORINO

PURE. ViSION Edition PET/CT. Patient Comfort Put First.

Attenuation map reconstruction from TOF PET data

SPECT: Physics Principles and Equipment Design

Radiology. Marta Anguiano Millán. Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad de Granada

In the short span since the introduction of the first

Quality control phantoms and protocol for a tomography system

Detection of Lesions in Positron Emission Tomography

2005 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record M Influence of Depth of Interaction on Spatial Resolution and Image Quality for the HRRT

Reconstruction from Projections

Computed Tomography. Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances. Jiang Hsieh THIRD EDITION. SPIE PRESS Bellingham, Washington USA

Symbia E and S System Specifications Answers for life.

Transcription:

Planar and SPECT Cameras Summary Introduction to Positron Emission Tomography, Ph.D. Nuclear Medicine Basic Science Lectures srbowen@uw.edu System components: Collimator Detector Electronics Collimator Types: Parallel, Converging, Diverging, Pinhole, Multi-pinhole Performance: Penetration, Resolution, Efficiency Detector: Components: Scintillator crystal, Optical spacer, PMTs Performance: Efficiency, Intrinsic (spatial) resolution, Energy resolution Acquisition modes: Frame vs List mode Static (time-averaged), Dynamic (TAC), Gated (cardiac / respiration) Camera QA corrections: Uniformity, Linearity, Photo-peak window, Multi-energy registration SPECT QA/QC: Center-of-rotation, Head tilt, uniformity PET Definition Positron Uses positron ( + ) emitting radio-isotopes to label physiologic tracers (e.g. glucose metabolism, cell proliferation, hypoxia) Positrons are unstable in that they annihilate with electrons, resulting in two anti-parallel photons each with energy 511 kev PET scanners measure coincident annihilation photons and collimate the source of the decay via coincidence detection Emission The source of the signal is emission of annihilation photons from within the patient, as opposed to photons transmitted through the patient in x-ray imaging Tomography Three-dimensional volume image reconstruction through collection of projection data from all angles around the patient Positron Annihilation Parent nucleus: unstable due to excessive P/N ratio ( 18 F, 11 C, 13 N, 15 O, 14 I) ( 18 O, 11 B, 13 C, 15 N, 14 Te) + + + proton decays to neutron neutrino also emitted (inconsequential to PET) P N P N N P P N P N N P e+ positron emission positron may scatter ~ 1 mm e- e+ positron annihilates with an electron: mass energy is converted to electromagnetic energy resulting in two anti-parallel annihilation photons 1

Emission Coincidence Detection Tomographic Data Acquisition i time detector i detector j Random rate determined from i, j singles rates All coincidence events acquired over time allows dynamic imaging Group coincidence data into parallel projections (LOR) for tomographic reconstruction j coincidence events detector i-j coincidence Sort LOR into sinograms and/or save list-mode data LOR Projection Angle Coincidence Events: Signal and Noise PET detectors seek simultaneous gamma ray absorptions (simultaneous within ~ 5-1 ns) PET signal components Measured Projections P = T + S + R True Signal Noise from Scatter Noise from Random T! "t # r ij! activity R! "t # r i # r j! activity r ij = photon pair detection rate in detector pixels i,j r i = single photon detection rate in pixel i Scattered coincidence: one or both photons change direction from a scatter before detection True coincidence: anti-parallel photons travel directly to and are absorbed by detectors Random coincidence: photons from different nuclear decays are detected simultaneously NOTE: scattered and random coincidence lines-of-response need not pass through object! S and R has to be estimated and removed Estimation challenges R estimation accurate and efficient (singles method) S estimation can have significant errors (e.g. lung)

PET Acquisition: D vs. 3D Mode Form of collimation (septa) that separate axial slices in D PET - reduces scattered and random events (also reduces trues!) blocked septa & end shielding detector crystals scatter & randoms PET Contrast and Quantitation Noise from Scattered Coincidence Predominantly Compton scatter. Gamma rays scatter off of electrons, change direction and lose energy. results in misplaced events due to change in photon direction (loss of contrast) energy discrimination can eliminate scatter (but not all) correction based on scatter equations, scatter object (CT), measured data Noise from Random Coincidence Random events proportional to singles rates squared Mean random events estimated in two ways: measured with delayed coincidence window (direct measure, high noise due to random rate) calculated based on system singles rates (low noise singles-based calculation) D PET uses axial septa 3D PET uses no septa Attenuation of Signal Gamma rays are absorbed in the patient Variability due to heterogeneity of attenuating tissue Correctable with properly aligned attenuation map Signal and Noise Estimates PET Contrast: D vs. 3D mode Scatter Fraction (SF) SF = S T + S 4 SF = S T + S D = % 3D = 34% DSTE Count Rates: NEMA Cylinder Phantom 1 T NEC = T + S +!R DSTE Measured NEC Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) SNR = T! P ( )! T T + S +!R depends on randoms estimation method Count rate (kcps) 3 1 3D R 3D S 3D T D R D T NEC rate (kcps) 8 6 4 D NEC 3D NEC Noise Equivalent Counts (NEC) T NEC = T + S +!R D S 5 1 15 Phantom activity (mci) FDG oncology patient activity: 5 1 15 Phantom activity (mci) A scan = A inj! e "! ( t scan"t inj ) A scan = ( 1 "15mCi)! 1 6min 11min # 7 "1mCi 3

Annihilation Photon Attenuation PET/CT Attenuation Correction (AC) Anti-parallel gamma ray coincidence detection means that attenuation is independent of position along any line of response. detector 1 detector x µ ( x)dx Attn. of photon 1: P 1 = e Attn. of photon : x a x a x P = e µ ( x)dx CT (diagnostic) PET/CT Scanners" CT scan used for PET AC" CT image is downsampled to PET resolution" Advantages" Fast acquisition" Low image noise" Disadvantages" Higher dose" Attn. coeff. measured with poly-energetic photons < 14 kev" Total attn. of coincidence pair: P C = P 1 P = e a µ ( x)dx same CT, re- sampled to PET resolution Consequences of CTAC! More accurate quantitation" P c is independent of annihilation position x PET/CT Scanners PET Detector Block Clinical PET/CT Micro PET/CT PET scanners are assembled in block modules Each block uses a limited number of PMTs to decode an array of scintillation crystals signal out to processing Two dual photocathode PMTs Reflective light sealing tape gamma rays scintillation light 4

Inside GE Discovery STE PET/CT PET Spatial Resolution Positron Physics Positron Range Photon Non-colinearity Block matrix: BGO crystals" "6 x 8 crystals (axial by transaxial)" "Each crystal:" " "6.3 mm axial" " "4.7 mm transaxial" " Scanner construction" "Axial:" " "4 blocks axially = 4 rings" " "15.7 cm axial extent" "Transaxial:" " "7 blocks around = 56 xtals" " "88 cm BGO ring diameter" " "7 cm patient port" 13,44 individual crystals" Detectors Response function Ring Geometry Non-uniform LOR sampling Depth-of-interaction Reconstruction Filters Resolution components add in quadrature R system = R pos. phys. + R det + R sampl + R recon Positron Physics Resolution Detector Signal Decoding Positron range maximum energy of isotope scatter medium Positron rms range (mm) 3.5 1.5 1.5 18 F 11 C 13 N 68 Ga 15 O 8 Rb.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 Maximum positron kinetic energy (MeV) data from Derenzo, et al. IEEE TNS 33:565-569, 1986 Light Sharing Relative PMTs signal heights depend on crystal of interaction Axial Radial Signal Decoding Energy, E = A + B + C + D Axial position, Z = (C +D) / E Transverse position, X = (B + D) / E Radial position: not determined (no DOI) Transverse Axial A C Photon non-colinearity Non-colinearity: R non-colin =. x Ring Diameter Clinical scanner: Diam. ~ 8-9 cm; R non-col. ~ mm Small animal scanner ~ 15 - cm; R non-col. ~.4 mm A PMTs C B D 5

Detector Resolution PET Ring Geometry Effect on Resolution Data Sampling Error: Coincidence lines-of-response are not uniformly spaced across a ring detector Interpolate to uniform spacing, or account for non-uniformity in reconstruction w center Depth-of-Interaction error: entrance position and true line-of-response w/ edge photon penetration Peaks for different crystals at different positions" Window center and width adjusted for each crystal" detection position and assigned line-of-response Resolution Effect of Smoothing vs. Noise with FBP Human abdomen simulation with cm diam. lesion :1 contrast PET Sensitivity 1. Absorption efficiency of detectors scintillation crystal attenuation coefficient scintillation crystal thickness detector response uniformity more counts (less noise) less smoothing (more noise). Solid angle coverage of object by detectors PET ring diameter smaller diameter pro: increases solid angle and sensitivity, reduces system cost con: leads to DOI resolution degradation con: limits patient size PET ring axial length larger axial extent pro: increases solid angle and sensitivity con: increases system cost 6

Detector Sensitivity vs. Resolution Tradeoff Inorganic scintillation crystals relevant PET scanner property sensitivity Geometric Efficiency vs. Sensitivity PET scanner sensitivity scales with the number of detectable coincidence events, which in turn scales as max. This results in lower sensitivity at the end of any PET scanner axial center plane m ax scanner axis axial end plane edg e source energy & spatial resolution counting speed (randoms rate, dead- time sensitivity max Full max photo- sensor matching, manufacturing cost Limited edge = o *crystal thickness, t: typically BGO scanners use t = 3cm, LSO scanners use t = cm for cost reasons. PET scanners are not made from NaI(Tl) or BaF due to low sensitivity, despite other advantages Graph from Emission Tomography, Eds. Wernick, Aarsvold, pg.186 PET scanner axis QA for PET Scanners: Evaluation of Performance Metrics PET Image Formation Workflow Current specifications based on National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Standard Sensitivity - both system and per transaxial slice (measured with a line source) Primary Detection Decoding Detector corrections Spatial resolution - measured with a point source and an analytical image reconstruction algorithm at several positions in the scanner FOV (x,y,z resolution) Uniformity - measured with a uniform cylinder of activity Count rate - measured with a decaying line source in a solid, cold cylinder Coincidence Processing Data Binning Data Corrections Dead time correction accuracy - measured from the count rate data Scatter fraction - measured from the count rate data Attenuation correction accuracy, contrast performance - from a non-cylindrical phantom with hot and cold spheres. Image Reconstruction 7

October 18, 11 Email: srbowen@uw.edu Nuclear Medicine Basic Science Lectures Stephen Bowen Analytic Reconstruction Backprojection Iterative Reconstruction Filtered Backprojection f ( ) f ( k) initial image estimate measured data p(k) = Hf (k) + n compute estimated projection data From WikiBooks Basic Physics of Digital Radiography FBP assumes linear projections and does not account for many sources of variability in LOR Backprojection leads to streak artifacts in PET images Reconstructed PET/CT images p p p ( k) compare measured and estimated projection data f (k) f (k+1) update image estimate based on ratio or difference There are many ways to: model the system (and the noise) compare measured and estimated projection data update the image estimate based on the differences between measured and estimated projection data decide when to stop iterating Modern Times: Time-of-Flight Time-of-flight capability is now offered in many new PET scanners" Measure time difference of detection of coincidence gammas" No AC kvct AC-CT Defines a line segment in space, shorter than distance between detectors" Improves image signal to noise that is a function of the object size." Conventional LOR OS-EM FBP TOF Gaussian SOR fused segment length!x = cdt/!x c = speed of light Dt = timing resolution AC: Attenuation Correction OS-EM: Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization FBP: Filtered Back-Projection!x = 7.5 cm for the Dt ~.5 ns typical of TOF PET scanners 8

PET Introduction Summary PET concept Physics of positron emission, photon annihilation, coincidence detection PET components D collimated vs. 3D acquisition mode, detector block PET resolution Positron range, detector response, line-of-response sampling, depth-of-interaction Take home 1: clinical PET resolution ~ 5 mm, small animal PET ~ 1 mm PET quantitation CT attenuation correction Take home : separable attenuation correction makes PET more quantitative than SPECT or MRI PET sensitivity Absorption efficiency, geometric efficiency Take home 3: PET sensitivity 1 3 greater than SPECT, 1 6 greater than MRI PET image formation Acquisition Reconstruction 9