Virtualization techniques: Opportunities for fixed/mobile convergence

Transcription

1 Virtualization techniques: Opportunities for fixed/mobile convergence Fabrice Guillemin Orange Labs, IMT/IMT/OLN/CNC/NCA Networking May 21, 2015

2 Overview Introduction Convergent gateway: design principles and implementation Use cases Further issues related to convergent gateways 2 interne Orange

3 Introduction: Fixed/mobile convergence Fixed/mobile convergence is a recurrent issue in the design of networks Architecture of mobile and fixed access networks has been inherited from principles of the 80 s for fixed and 90 s for cellular networks Mobile networks are greatly centralized: all traffic converges to a few concentration points (Packet GateWays, PGW) architecture of cellular networks designed by 3GPP and that of ADSL/FTTH fixed networks by Broadband Forum However, customers usage is changing (data traffic explosion, content services, streaming on cellular networks, user generated content, P2P, ) densification of the radio coverage (3G/4G, WiFi, small/femto/macro cells) IP has become the common convergence layer (even if L4/L3 functions are not in force, information is already packetized according to IP principles at the access) Key challenge: design of backhaul and mobile core networks for 5G 3

4 Architecture of fixed networks OTT services GigaBit Ethernet, use of VLAN for wall gardened services VoD TV STB 24/24 PC ToIP DSLAM IP/MPLS backhaul NE NE NM NC NC NM RBCI PF Orange Home GateWay BAS IP functions actually begin above the BNG (or BAS) 4

5 Architecture of cellular networks RAN Evolved Packet Core 2G 3G LTE Non 3GPP Untrusted Non-3GPP IP Access Trusted Non-3GPP IP Access NodeB enodeb BSC RNC S1-U Gb Iu S12 S1-MME S16 S3 S10 SGSN S4 MME S11 epdg SGW S6a Gr/S6d S2c S2b S2a S5 Gxc PGW S6b Gx SGi PCRF Rx+ Operator Services Internet Corporate Services SWx AAA HSS Control plane User plane Only a few PGW (less than 10 for the Orange France network) 5

6 Rationale for introducing a Convergent Gateway (CGW) Three main drivers: change of usage with smartphones and tablets (studies show that users are massively using WiFi in the domestic networks) densification of radio network (WiFi via fixed access or hot spots, femto, small, macro cells) explosion of traffic Usage massive usage by customers of the wireless technology to connect to the Internet (mobile and WiFi) customers wish to access the Internet without taking care of the access technology (WiFi, 3G/4G, wired) The customer is surrounded by many access networks but can hardly switch from one network to another (different authentication, addressing, customer s profile, routing, charging, ) 6

7 Limitations due separate architectures In terms of usage: each access network has its own addressing system and allocates IP addresses via PPP or DHCP NAT, local DHCP, at the home gateway NAT, (DHCP), at the PGW Addressing systems and policies are different Is IPv6 sufficient to overcome this problem? Unique IPv6 address per device? What about mobility, roaming, etc.? IP address changes when switching from one access network to another Applications need to adapt themselves in order to be resistant to IP address changes (issues with VPN, conversational and real time constrained applications, ) Many applications are resilient to IP address changing (e.g., adaptive streaming) but for real time applications (voice) this is still an open issue 7

8 Cost of separate architectures Customers generate more and more mobile traffic to cope with traffic explosion, centralized PGWs have to be continually upgraded and some links of the network have to be upgraded to carry traffic towards these gateways When a user switch from one network to the other, complex signaling procedures are run (notably radio bearer (de)activation) because of centralized control, huge amount of signaling traffic can appear (up to 30% of network radio capacity) all over the network Bearer activation is a source of latency (QUIC ) Centralized functions are vulnerable points in the architecture (Single Point of Failure, need for resilience at extra cost) Separate AAA need to be maintained Challenge: AAA without smart cards for unified access? 8

9 Technological trends L2/L1 concentration higher in the network larger distance between ONUs and OLT in optical access BBU hostelling in mobile networks development of new convergence points in the network (NGPoP) colocation of OLT and BBU hostels in NGPoPs Distribution of some IP features lower in the network: NGPoP host more network services distributed CDN to make information available closer to the end user Fog computing (distribution of data centers) Need for a new type of network element realizing the convergence between fixed and mobile access: The convergent gateway 9

10 CGW: Design principles and implementation 10

11 CGW principles Convergence of various types of access at Network s Edge: fixed, WiFi, cellular Authentication for cellular and fixed access Open issue: Need for a convergent AAA IP functions start at the CGW: routing, quality of service, mobility Information (in form of IP packet) is delivered to the IP collect network above the CGW no need for centralized platforms Dynamic instantiation on COTS servers/switches through Networks Functions Virtualization: flexible deployment, configuration, upgrades, scaling SDN used for flexible traffic control at Network s Edge 11

12 Location of the CGW same address pool for the APs connected to the CGW IP traffic, no GI functions (e.g., DPI) services in OTT mode enodeb Backhaul Network Convergent GW IP collect Network Internet WiFi Hotspot (public or private) Home Gateway pure IP, IP/MPLS, L2 or L1 possible colocation with NGPoPs need for a connection between addresses and AP 12

13 The functional blocks of the CGW all the functions are hosted by virtual machines (NFV) all the functions are coupled control plane DHCP Server AAA MME (LISP PxTR) L-ANDSF 1 Monitoring vepc WiFi controller address allocation authentication mobility management choice of the best AP supervision of the AP termination of GTP tunnels Control of the WiFi AP forwarding plane 13 switch/router (OVS) CGW 1 ANDSF (Access Network Detection and Selection function): standardized by 3GPP (centralized version), assists the terminal to select the best AN depending upon user s subscription (WiFi offloading)

14 Implementation issues alternative: do nothing in the network and let terminals manage mobility Mobility management (MME): intra CGW MME the need for MME depends on the addressing scheme used for allocating addresses to terminals connected to APs either the addresses depends on APs and in that case addresses may change when one terminal is moving from one AP to the other possible need for MME (LISP tested in lab, SDN solutions under study) or addresses are common to all AP; in that case, need for maintaining a map between the address and the AP for forwarding information (convergence function) inter CGW MME when one terminal moves from one CGW coverage to another CGW coverage possible use of LISP principles if the terminal communicate the identifier of the CGW; if a NAT is implemented in CGW (EID = IPv6 address of the terminal, and local ID = IP address of the CGW to maintain in the map resolver) 14

15 Implementation issues (cont d) vepc: need for open source vepc stacks challenge with the current vepc: break the link between GTP-U and GTP-C GPT-U should be handled by the forwarding function only GTP-C should be hosted by separate VMs address allocation should be done by the global DCHP server More challenging: no more GTP tunnels use the same principles as for fixed networks without PPP tunnels use of DHCP for address allocation, flat IP in the backhaul, unified AAA between fixed and wireless networks Monitoring Is it possible to do monitoring in Virtual Machines? Can (soft) switches do port mirroring at high speeds (> 1Gbit/s)? What is the trade-off between processing capacities and the level of traffic analysis? 15

16 Further issues Convergence Fixe/dMobile AAA Authent Accounting OAM NFV Cloud MNGT Added Value Services Security SDN HA Scalability Mobility (MME, EPC) Monitoring (ANDSF, ) DHCP (Ipv6, ) OVS, ODL, vepc, Charging and accounting: The distribution of the mobile core makes it difficult to count traffic/user reinvent charging? End of capped offers? CGW instantiated in (mini) data centers possibility to couple with added value services: WebRTC TURN servers to enable WebRTC services CDN servers co-located with the CGW. Quality of service and traffic management monitoring functions and Local-ANDSF to perform traffic and QoS management possible API for QoS negotiation how to manage QoS without radio information? Couple traffic management with BBU hostels? 16

17 Use cases for fog/edge computing 17

18 Introduction to use cases The CGW can be coupled to Service/Content processing and storage facilities at the Network s Edge Possible services which could associated with a CGW Services, (WebRTC) Content (incl. User Generated), mini CDN nodes business cloud, IoT data, user s assistance, Several use cases can be anticipated 18

19 Business premises Operator s core (possibly incl. AAA/HSS) 2 1 CGW CGW The CGW is a gateway of the LAN of a business customer, which can optimize the use of radio resources (especially for data) For cellular sessions, the operator s mobile core can be used for AAA 19

20 For backhauling crowds Operators HSS Operators Networks CGW Event In the case of crowded events, the cellular network is often saturated The CGW can be used to backhaul radio APs (cellular with limited range or WiFi) 20

21 Further issues related to a CGW 21

22 CGW on the fly The basic design principles of a CGW is that this element should be instantiated on the fly on data centers (OpenStack) distributed at network edges (fog computing) there is hence a need for a tool capable of configuring such elements (typically OpenStack) But CGWs should be interconnected, sometimes with bandwidth constraints OpenStack is not sufficient by itself, there is a need for a tool able to configure the network in order to interconnect CGW (e.g., OpenDaylight), typically when used to backhaul an enterprise network OpenDayLight and Openstackhave been developed for given purposes, there is a need for a tool with a global view of the network in terms of storage, computing and bandwidth GlobalOS 22

23 OpenDayLight (open source, hosted by the Linux foundation) 23

24 OpenStack (for cloud mainly, compute and storage) 24

25 Configuration of a CGW (OpenStack centralized view) OpenStack configuration of CGW Nova configuration of CGW Data center Neutron [ceilometer] Data center VM (vepc ( vepc) Network tunnel configuration. Network tunnel configuration. VM (vepc ( vepc) VM (AAA) VM (AAA) Switch/router (e.g. OVS) CGW L3/L2 tunnel tunnel Neutron agent Neutron agent Switch/router (e.g. OVS) CGW network Openstack can control and configure a CGW from the edge (nothing in the network) 25

26 Configuration of a CGW (OpenStack + ODL) OpenStack OpenStack configuration of CGW Nova Nova configuration of CGW Neutron [ceilometer] Neutron [ceilometer] Data center Network tunnel configuration. Neutron service OpenDaylight Network tunnel configuration. Data center VM (vepc ( vepc) Node config. Node config. VM (vepc ( vepc) VM (AAA) VM (AAA) Switch/router (e.g. OVS) CGW L3/L2 tunnel tunnel Neutron agent Neutron agent Switch/router (e.g. OVS) CGW network 26

27 Configuration of CGW (orchestration) request for VM configuration resource reporting orchestrator (network abstraction) request for VM configuration resource reporting OpenStack network configuration requests/ network abstraction OpenStack configuration of CGW Nova Nova configuration of CGW Neutron [ceilometer] Neutron [ceilometer] Data center Network tunnel configuration. Neutron service OpenDaylight Network tunnel configuration. Data center VM (vepc ( vepc) Node config./monitoring Node config./monitoring VM (vepc ( vepc) VM (AAA) VM (AAA) Switch/router (e.g. OVS) CGW L3/L2 tunnel tunnel Neutron agent Neutron agent Switch/router (e.g. OVS) CGW network 27

28 Global OS: first view API Services Security (network programming language) orchestration by using network abstraction (topology, resources, etc.), scheduling, etc. Openstack OpenDayLight Global OS data center configuration and monitoring (openflow, netconf, etc.) data center data center network 28

29 GlobalOS framework Fault mgt Perf. mgt Network orchestrator Resource allocation Network data collector Network data base Network drivers Network characteristics 29

30 Network programming language Very active domain of research Many languages have been proposed so far static approach NetKAT (Kleen Algebra with Test): express network procedures into an equational system (for formally proving properties of procedures) NICE MERLIN dynamic approach Kinetic VeryFlow Most languages are packet based and do not include resource allocation aspects 30

31 Conclusion Virtualization techniques offer new possibilities for networking instantiation of VMs on the fly for specific tasks (in particular NFV) Convergent gateways: package of VMs realizing control for fixed/mobile convergence (vepc, AAA, DHCP, convergence functions, etc.) Convergent gateways raise many issues addressing, AAA, and mobility management new charging scheme (more difficult to count traffic per user, capped offers vs. usage/network conditions) monitoring: Is it possible to instantiate network probes on VM instead of dedicated hardware? Convergent gateways can be included in a more general framework: GlobalOS a global OS acts as the OS of a computer but at a network scale need for abstraction of network resources resource management, language for network configuration, etc. 31

32 Thank you 32