AGC California CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2010

Transcription

1 AGC California CONSTRUCTION OUTLOOK 2010 Southern California Ontario, California February 23, 2010 CALIFORNIA COURTS BUILDING PROGRAM: Planning, Design and Construction

2 S. Ernest Swickard, AIA Assistant Director Design and Construction Services Rona G. Rothenberg, FAIA Senior Manager Design and Construction Services Judicial Council of California Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Court Construction and Management

3 California-Established in 1850

4 Access to Justice for all Americans Central Justice Center, Orange County Richard Neutra, Architect, Circa 1966

5 California Courts Statistics 6 appellate districts with 9 separate facilities, some leased Over 2000 judicial officers serving a population of 34 Million Over 500 trial court buildings, with ~2,100 courtrooms 10 Million square feet of trial court space in 24 Million gross square feet of courtcounty shared buildings (30% of the inventory is in Los Angeles)

6 California Court Locations

7 California Court Locations Relative Court Sizes

8 More statistics... About the buildings: 70% built before 1980 >80% constructed under pre-1998 codes 23 are trailers or other temporary buildings 25% lack space to assemble jurors Almost 100% have poor security and are functionally deficient

9

10

11

12

13

14 A Court Building Program for the 21 st Century

15 Judicial Council of California Governing Body of the California Courts Mission Statement: Under the leadership of the Chief Justice and in accordance with the California Constitution, the law, and the mission of the judiciary, the Judicial Council shall be responsible for setting the direction and providing the leadership for improving the quality and advancing the consistent, independent, impartial, and accessible administration of justice.

16 AOC Mission Statement Excellence Leadership Service The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) shall serve the Chief Justice, the Judicial Council, and the courts for the benefit of all Californians by advancing leadership and excellence in the administration of justice that continuously improves access to a fair and impartial judicial system.

17 Program History and Background Consolidation of municipal and superior courts since 1997 Ongoing judicial branch reform through unification of over 200 separate municipal and superior courts into 58 courts, one per county, as a separate but equal branch of government Ongoing transfer of facilities from the counties to the state

18 Completion of Courthouse Transfers Authorized by the Trial Court Facilities Act of 2002 All courthouses in California now managed by the Administrative Office of the Courts Remarkable historic achievement 7 year process Over 100 people from the AOC involved Negotiated transfer agreements with all 58 counties One of the largest conveyances of buildings in history of California

19 San Diego County Courthouse

20 LA South District Long Beach Courthouse

21 El Dorado Branch Courthouse, South Lake Tahoe

22 LA Southwest Division South Bay Courthouse

23 Facilities Program Overview Transfers Completed Facility Management Leases Managed 532 buildings 19 million square feet 240 leases, licenses, concessions Facility Modifications Completed over 2,000 Nearly 840 in progress Contacts to Customer Service Center CAFM Capital Projects Managed 8,000 per month, over 110,000 since inception 1,000+ users 6 complete, 54 active projects, $6.5 billion

24 Moving Forward Next Year Facility Management - 19 million square feet Facility Modifications (Deferred Maintenance) $80 million annually More than 1,500 projects/year

25 Moving Forward Next Year 54 Capital Projects - $6.5 billion 1 Performance-Based Infrastructure 7 more in Construction 5 in Design 41 in Acquisition 22 A/E selections

26 How We Will Implement the Program Office of Court Construction and Management formed over 7 years ago Staff of over 155 people Headquartered in San Francisco Regional Offices in San Francisco, Burbank and Sacramento Authority to plan, acquire, design, construct, facility management

27 OCCM OFFICE OF COURT CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT Mission To create and maintain court buildings that reflect the highest standards of excellence.

28 The way we were... From 10 staff in 2002 to over 20 staff in 2004

29 The way we are now Over 50 staff in 2005 Over 80 staff in staff at the end of 2009 includes OCCM staff and AOC division support staff that implement our projects

30 Organizational Chart Regional Manager Superior Court OCCM Project Manager Department of Finance (DOF) Consultant Subcontractor Consultant Architects/ Engineers or Contractor Subcontractor Consultant Subcontractor OCCM Real Estate and Asset Management Real Estate and Asset Management Facility Management Operations and Maintenance FMU Engineering CEQA OCCM Business and Planning Business and Finance Utilities Planning OCCM Design and Construction Services Project Management Standards Peer Reviews Construction Inspection OCCM Risk Management Office of the General Counsel Emergency Response Services Information Services CJER (A/V) Finance/Accounting & Business Services Center for Families Children & the Courts

31 How We Are Funded Capital Projects and Facility Modification Projects - fines and fees Facility Management Fees County Facility Payments transfer agreements Staff costs fines and fees General Fund minimal funding

32 Design Excellence

33 California Trial Court Facilities Standards 2006 Edition Adopted by the Judicial Council effective April 21, 2006

34 Five Essential Standards Principles of Design (Design Excellence) Courtrooms Courthouse Security Infrastructure for Technology Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, Lighting

35 Construction Cost

36 Cost Considerations Initial Cost Life Cycle Cost Risk Assessment Operations Impact Threat Assessment

37

38 General Project Schedule YEARS Site Selection & Acquisition Preliminary Plans (Schematic Design & Design Development) Working Drawings Bidding Construction

39 Project Delivery

40 Project Delivery Judicial Council approved, December 7, 2007: Court Facilities Contracting Policy. To provide Californians the best value initially and over the long-term operational life of court facilities the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) will follow competitive practices as set forth in these policies and procedures when contracting with qualified firms and individuals for products and services to be used in the planning, acquisition, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of trial and appellate court facilities.

41 Delivery Methods Contract with design teams using qualifications-based selection Risk most large capital projects Prequalified General Contractors smaller, remote capital projects Performance Based Infrastructure

42 Delivery Methods On Call Services - IDIQ General Contractors facility modification projects PM / CM extension of staff Estimating as needed Plan Review as needed Inspection extension of staff Materials Testing as needed Commissioning as needed Others as needed

43 Delivery Methods Facility Management Managed by OCCM staff Contract for operations and maintenance

44 Sustainability Measures All new courthouses will be built to LEED Silver Participation in Savings by Design and other utility company programs Energy Star ratings in existing courthouse operations

45 Quality Assurance Design Review of Construction Documents Construction Review of Materials and Installation Other Agencies: State Fire Marshal (SFM), Division of the State Architect (DSA), Corrections Standards Authority (CSA)

46 Program Management Highlights Stay within scope, budget, schedule Trial Court Facilities Standards Start every project with Management Plan Good working relationship with all trades Owner Controlled Insurance Program Facility Performance Evaluation Lessons Learned

47 SB 1732 Projects

48 Fourth District Court of Appeal, Santa Ana Status: Complete Construction Cost: $28M Architect: Carrier-Johnson Contractor: JCM Heery

49 Plumas/Sierra Counties Portola Loyalton Courthouse Cross Jurisdiction Branch Court Estimated Construction Cost: $5.5M Architect: Nacht & Lewis Contractor: (S. W. Allen Design-Bid, G.C. s prequalified)

50 Contra Costa County Richard E. Arneson Courthouse Estimated Construction Cost: $41M Architect: HOK Contractor: Sundt

51 Mono County New Mammoth Lakes Courthouse Estimated Construction Cost: $18.5M Architect: Cavagnero Assoc. Contractor: Sundt

52 Los Angeles County New Long Beach Courthouse Status: RFP in progress for developer teams Construction Cost: $297M Delivery: Performance Based Infrastructure (PBI)

53 New San Bernardino Courthouse Estimated Construction Cost: $284M Architect: SOM Contractor: Rudolph & Sletten,

54 San Joaquin County New Stockton Courthouse Estimated Construction Cost: $228M Architect: NBBJ/Seattle Contractor: Turner, Sacramento

55 Calaveras County San Andreas Courthouse Construction Cost: $38M Architect: DLR Contractor:

56 New Madera Courthouse Construction Cost:$82M Architect: A.C. Martin Delivery:

57 Tulare County Porterville Courthouse Construction Cost: $81K Architect: CO Architects Delivery:

58 Riverside County Mid-County Courthouse Construction Cost: $58M Architect: R.C. Binder Architecture Delivery: Gilbane

59 San Benito County Hollister Courthouse Construction Cost: $32M Architect: SmithGroup Delivery: Kitchell, Sub-bids in 2010

60 Lassen County Susanville Courthouse Construction Cost: $32M Architect: LDBG Design Group Delivery: DBB prequalification by early 2010

61 SB 1407 (Perata) Bonded Future Projects Year One Pending A&E Selection A&E Selection Group 1 Completed Contractors to be solicited after acquisitions are complete and design has started,

62 Project Opportunities **Architect selected previously

63

64 Challenges Maintain funding and legislation as currently authorized

65 Request Your Support SB 1407 We are working with industry associations for support from members WCCC, AIA CC, CMAA, AGC, ACEC, Trades Council, Chambers of Commerce, others May request your support

66 Service Providers We Cannot Do This Without You Our Commitment To You Owner of Choice Fair, objective selection process Fair and reasonable contracts Fair and reasonable project management Pay within 30 days Make timely decisions

67 Service Providers What We Listen Expect From You Do not forget who your client is Quality services cost estimates, schedules, inspections, commissioning, others Quality Design buildings should look good, meet needs of court users, be safe, secure, efficient, and economical to operate and maintain

68 Service Providers What We Expect From You Quality Design documents must be good quality, well coordinated, minimal change orders due to design errors or omissions Quality Construction courthouses will be here for years Safe Jobsite Good Relations with Trades Request for Additional Services only when fully justified

69 Service Providers What We Expect From You Construction Request for Change Orders - only when fully justified Construction Claims none for entire program Outreach to local firms Outreach to small businesses

70 Schedule of Upcoming Solicitations

71 Schedule of Upcoming PM / CM IDIQ RFQ A/E IDIQ February Solicitations Security / AV / IT - March Design Teams 9 projects in January, 8 in March, 5 in May Owner Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) - January Risk Madera - February

72 Schedule of Upcoming Solicitations Risk per project refer to website Prequalified General Contractor per project refer to our website

73 For More Information Program Information: List of Projects: documents/aoc-capitalprojects.pdf

74 Help us build...

75 Questions/Comments