COMPLAINT REFERRAL FORM

Transcription

1 COMPLAINT REFERRAL FORM Complaint ID: I The following information was provided by the victim and may be forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement or regulatory agencies. Date: 06/11/ :31:59 Victim Information Name: Nicole Guihaume Business Name: Age: Gender: F Address: 9 rue des Perichaux City: Paris Do you live within the city limits?: Yes County: State: Country: France Zip Code/Route: Phone number: Address: nicole@nicoleguihaume.com Name of your local police or sheriff's office: I ignore it Is the complaint you are filing related to the Internet or an online service? Yes Do you have pertinent documents in paper form? Yes Page 1 of 6

2 Information about the Individual/Business that victimized you Business Name: Google Name: Larry Page Gender: M Address: Googleplex Mountainview City: State: California Country: United States Zip Code/Route: Phone number: Address: larrypage@google.com Other Identifiers Web Site: IP Address: IRC Server: Chat Room Name: Usenet Newsgroup: Other: Monetary Loss If you lost money from the incident you are reporting, please specify the total dollar amount of your loss Please indicate the means of payment (select all that apply) Cash Cashier's Check Check/Debit Card Credit Card Money Order Wire Transfer Other (Specify)Defamation by search engine, in criminal network Did you use a third party online payment service such as PayPal, BidPay, Escrow? No Description of the Incident Describe in your own words how you have been victimized. This is my fourth complaint against Larry Page, after I , I and Page 2 of 6

3 I It is, as the former ones, and the ones filed against Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin in relation with the harassment both Bill Gates and I face since June I am unable to read back the first complaints I filed each time I add some new information, always fear not to be clear enough if I do not precise once more the framework, the fact I receive signs through my computer and inside my appartment, that two opposite connections exist...and I also fear to repeat too much. My context is hard, I apologize, aware that these complaints have many defaults. I faced from May 5 to June 8 hard time due to a complaint filed against me by the licra, and asked by a lawyer, Rodolphe Cahn. I consider it is abusive because I did not provoke publicly to hate, violence, discrimination, but tried to understand how the harassment I face has been possible. Furthermore the complaint concerned notes I wrote on my blog October 18, 19 and 26. This blog and its administration were abusively closed by over-blog December 24, immediately after I sent three complaints I filed or completed. I exposed in them the danger Bill Gates faced all December long as he was asked in legal hearings to accuse me of harassing him. His own children were used against him, unaware that the aim was then to kill him and pretend I would have provoked his suicide by harassing him. I knew google was aware of these threats as I used gmail and faced much than abnormal opposition when I warned as I was asked to. For example, December 23, I was outside my home and suddenly had the certainty a danger existed at the moment, I went immediately to a public computer but faced limit in hotmail my principal box, tried gmail but could not remember my pass word and was asked an abnormal number of questions I never faced in the past. At that moment, I had the certainty that the google team was definitely criminal, acted in the context of an agenda in which non jews are considered as existing only to serve jews as rabbi Ovadia Yosef pretended October 18, 2010 on the Jerusalem Post -it was in fact a sermon he did the Saturday before, presented by Jonah Mandel-. Here: Bill Gates never opposed a single word to the descriptions I did of what he faced all December long. Since that day, my opinion did not change, or even worsened. I consider google executives as criminals and cowards used to hide their actions as soon as identified. They do not change because they realize that they abused but because they observe that some people oppose. For example I asked them many times to stop inserting the url of Paul Maurer who defames me since 2010 and used to comment after me as soon as I commented in the past what I do not anymore. As he hacks me continuously, he knew what I wrote, came and wrote the same stupid accusations of nazism and so on. Google immediately presented them linked to my name, though no soft would find such results. It also presented his insane blog inserting the nickname cretinator, my address and the usual insults this internaut uses. I asked them once more to stop inserting this url May 4, received an answer which looked like provocation due to the fact Maurer only uses insults and defamation. I was replied that the informations were accurate and updated. That the reference to this content in their results was justified by the interest of the public to acceed them. I was surprised to observe that they could go that far, and replied to the executive team. Here: One week later, they sent me twice the same mail to inform me that they would erase Maurer link. I cannot obtain the link but it is in this file: I named it Echange mail google removals 20 mai I obtained this removal after I sent widely the last complaint I filed against Larry Page. In the last complement I wrote May 14, I evoked the letter of the 80 academics on the right to be forgotten. I added their addresses in a mailing list. This, in my opinion, is the only reason why google finally pushed out the url of Maurer, but it did not really did so. It let pictures which come from his blog, among which an acknoledgment of receipt I put on line April 2013 on my blog, as I needed to prove I really sent the letter I showed. Another one is a picture of Robert Faurisson when he was aggressed by integrists, and this can be perceived as a threat in my opinion. Something like Either you stop exposing the harassment or we can attack you. This exposes the way this company behaves. Furthermore, as my blogs are abusively closed on a regular basis, it happened to April 29. Once more for so-called antisemitism, though apart from former texts on NDE, only FBI complaints appeared on it. It has been impossible to transfer the url and I use the mail I have with it by OVH. I guess they react their best as I Page 3 of 6

4 face hacking, so I shall say nothing. I opened and some texts appeared googling my name. I observed it. Then, one day, only one was present and the words chosen appeared to be the ones which would make one avoid it. It was words I wrote to precise I was sorry for I could not recall in each note the context which is so complex. In google appeared these words: Sur ce blog difficilement lisible par quelqu-un qui n-a pas connu les precedents, qui n-a pas suivi le harcelement decrit. It was at a moment the warnings did not stop concerning the hearing I had, and I was angry, thought that I did all what I could, would I be killed, I could do nothing more. I nevertheless observed the way google behaved as if they began to erase the proofs even before it occurred. What appears now is some other words of my blog. Apart from that, two urls can obviously not have been found by a robot and were surely done in the sole aim to appear in google. I, in fact, send widely my complaints, using mailing lists of professionals which can go to addresses each one. On each single mails authorities coordinates appear who oppose nothing. I had for example the assistant of Tom Enders on the phone and she told me that they were perfectly aware of my situation, that all the mails I sent were forwarded to Peter Kleinschmidt the judicial director. This indicates that if I send mass mail, it is not what we name spam. On each mail appear a link to unsubscribe and I unsubscribe immediately each person who asks for it. Nevertheless google found a link on a Microsoft forum of a andrew@srosxi.org who seems to be Andrew K. Helyer, a geek who has all the means to identify a link to unsubscribe. I guess he only wrote on my s to appear in google in a defamation aim, pretending he had no way to protect him against me. At the moment he did so, I observed that my s to Bill Gates came back in failure message, and I had the certainty he was not responsible for that. It fact, soon after, they were received again. The same thing -to create a link only in an aim of defamation- was done with a small english blog I opened a short time to present my IC3 complaints as it appeared it could help concerning the disappearance of the malaysian flight. This blog was not seen. Googling my name, what appears first is an evaluation of its content by scamadviser to identify if it can content malware. These words appear: Is nicole-guihaume.blog.co.uk legit and trustworthy Traduire cette page check if nicole-guihaume.blog.co.uk is a scam website or a legit website. Is nicole-guihaume.blog.co.uk fraudulent or infected with malware, phishing, fraud,? Here: This is google strategy and so doing, it endangers definitely. I wrote many times that the web was very effective as protection, as are the collective mails. The strategy of harassment is a coward strategy conceived with the determination to act always hidden, never to be identified. Its conception contains the means to erase the proofs and to prevent the victim from taking some. To be present on the web is a protection. It has consequences which can also be used as proofs if we observe websites such as or against which I filed a complaint in August. They only exist to defame the critics, to ridicule the proofs they present. They are part of the teams used by google whose first goal in my opinion is to prevent Gentiles from defending themselves and from even realizing themselves. The way they defame Bill Gates is an illustration. Would someone use the same means to ridicule them, it would be much than easy for their world is a world of lies, treachery, deception and crime. It goes that far that yesterday, as I printed a complaint I filed against Hollande, three lines appeared impossible to read, though the other ones were perfect. The lines which disappeared concerned google. It was: While he opened eight blogs to defame me as he also did on facebook and was not at all seen, google pushed long for him, presenting the url of his blog as first url googling my name. I had to complain numerous times to obtain that it pushed it away. I exposed it here: Would this world go through the criminal period it now faces, the google team should be jailed. Each search engine controlled. Yahoo behaves the same way but is less used, less dangerous. Page 4 of 6

5 Please indicate any medium used by the individual/business in the course of the incident. Bulletin board Chat room Fax In person Internet messaging Mail Newsgroup Telephone Web site Wire Other Please indicate the initial means of contact with the individual/business that victimized you. Was this initial means of contact unsolicited/uninvited? No What was your relationship with the individual/business you are complaining about prior to the incident you are reporting? no prior relationship Did you conduct any research on the individual/business prior to the incident? No How much time has passed since you determined you were victimized? 6 months or more Page 5 of 6

6 Contact Information Are there witnesses or other victims to this crime? Bill Gates, as always, victim and witness number one. Have you reported this crime to any law enforcement or government agencies? Better Business Bureau Consumer protection agency Individual/business that victimized you Police/other law enforcement Private attorney Provide the specific name of each organization, contact name, contact phone number, address, date reported, and report number (if known). I filed many complaints behind the IC3 after my request behind the ECHR was rejected February 14, I filed the first one December 31, 2013, number I The last ones are here: Page 6 of 6