Spoilt for Choice Which Integration Framework to choose? Mule ESB. Integration. Kai Wähner

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Spoilt for Choice Which Integration Framework to choose? Mule ESB. Integration. Kai Wähner"

Randall Adams
5 years ago
Views:

1 Spoilt for Choice Which Integration Framework to choose? Integration vs. Mule ESB vs.

Main Tasks Evaluation of Technologies and Products Requirements Engineering Enterprise Architecture Management Business Process Management Architecture and Development of Applications Planning and

2 Main Tasks Evaluation of Technologies and Products Requirements Engineering Enterprise Architecture Management Business Process Management Architecture and Development of Applications Planning and Introduction of SOA Integration of Legacy Applications Cloud Computing Consulting Developing Speaking Coaching Writing Contact Blog: Social Networks: Xing, LinkedIn Seite 2

3 What is the Key Message? Seite 3

4 Key Messages Do not reinvent the integration wheel! Seite 4

5 Key Messages Do not reinvent the integration wheel! There are some good alternatives for Integration! Seite 5

6 Key Messages Do not reinvent the integration wheel! There are some good alternatives for Integration! Often an ESB is the wrong Choice! Seite 6

7 Agenda 1) Systems Integration 2) Integration Frameworks 3) Spring Integration 4) Mule ESB 5) Apache Camel 6) And the Winner is Seite 7

8 Agenda 1) Systems Integration 2) Integration Frameworks 3) Spring Integration 4) Mule ESB 5) Apache Camel 6) And the Winner is Seite 8

9 What is the Problem? Growth Applications Interfaces Technologies Products Seite 9

10 Heterogeneity Seite 10

11 Spaghetti Solutions Everybody communicates to everybody Seite 11

12 Solution: Systems Integration All Roads lead to Rome Seite 12

13 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Seite 13

14 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Spring Integration vs. Mule ESB vs. Apache Camel Seite 14

15 Agenda 1) Systems Integration 2) Integration Frameworks 3) Spring Integration 4) Mule ESB 5) Apache Camel 6) And the Winner is Seite 15

16 Wishes Standardized Modeling Efficient Realization Automatic Testing Seite 16

17 Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP) Seite 17

18 Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP) Seite 18

19 Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP) 19

20 Relation between EIPs and Integrations Frameworks Integration vs. Mule ESB vs. implement Seite 20

21 Comparison Criteria Open source Basic concepts / architecture Testability Commercial support Error handling Monitoring Enterprise readiness Developer-centric vs. designer-centric Expandability Deployment Popularity Tool support Connectivity Domain specific language (DSL) Seite 21

22 Similarities Seite 22

23 Connectivity Integration of different Technologies Seite 23

24 Domain Specific Languages (DSL) A domain-specific language (DSL) is a programming language or specification language dedicated to a particular problem domain, a particular problem representation technique, and / or a particular solution technique. Wikipedia Seite 24

problem domain, a particular problem representation technique, and / or

25 Domain Specific Languages (DSL) A domain-specific language (DSL) is a programming language or specification language dedicated to a particular problem domain, a particular problem representation technique, and / or a particular solution technique. Wikipedia Internal DSL Seite 25

26 Architecture (Exemplarily: Apache Camel => Concepts are all the same, only different names) Seite 26

27 Deployment Standalone Application Server Web Container Spring Container OSGi Cloud Seite 27

28 Enterprise-Ready Maturity Transactions Concurrency Error handling Monitoring Testability Seite 28

29 Licensing Integration vs. Mule ESB vs. Apache License Common Public Atttribution License (CPAL) Apache License Seite 29

30 Commercial Support Integration vs. Mule ESB vs Seite 30

31 Tool Support Integration Graph for Spring Integration Mule Studio for Mule ESB Fuse IDE for Apache Camel Talend Studio for Apache Camel Seite 31

32 Upcoming Procedure Concepts of each Framework Code Example Live Demo Seite 32

33 Comparison Criteria Focus Open source Basic concepts / architecture Testability Commercial support Error handling Monitoring Enterprise readiness Developer-centric vs. designer-centric Expandability Deployment Popularity Tool support Connectivity Domain specific language (DSL) Seite 33

34 Agenda 1) Systems Integration 2) Integration Frameworks 3) Spring Integration 4) Mule ESB 5) Apache Camel 6) And the Winner is Seite 34

35 Connectivity AMQP Feed File FTP(S) GemFire HTTP TCP UDP JDBC JMS Mail MongoDB Redis RMI SFTP Stream Twitter Web Service XML XMPP How to create own custom adapter? Seite 35

36 DSLs (Not production-ready yet) XML (Not production-ready yet) Seite 36

37 Code Example Seite 37

38 Code Example Seite 38

39 Live Demo Spring Integration in Action Seite 39

40 Integration Graph Seite 40

41 Integration Graph Pro Visual Designer for Spring Integration flows Vice versa Editing (code generation vs. coding by hand) Open Source (part of Spring IDE at github) Simple Eclipse plugin Just Spring Integration Export of flow diagrams Contra Non-intuitive usability Unclear diagrams Immature (e.g. missing documentation, problems with code examples) Seite 41

42 Agenda 1) Systems Integration 2) Integration Frameworks 3) Spring Integration 4) Mule ESB 5) Apache Camel 6) And the Winner is Seite 42

43 Mule ESB Seite 43

44 Standalone / Web Application Deployment Seite 44

45 Connectivity AS400 Data Queue Abdera Amazon SQS jbpm CICS CTG CXF FTP Hibernate HTTP/S Legs4Mule IMAP/S Servlet SFTP SMTP/S SOAP STDIO TCP UDP VM XMPP WebSphere MQ WSDL Atom Base64 encoded Byte arrays CSV Encrypted GZIP Hex Strings HTML/ XHTML Java Objects JSON EDI COBOL Copybook XML Amazon S3 Authorize.net Apple Push Bit.ly CMIS CyberSource Facebook Flickr HBase Magento JCR JDBC Jersey Jetty JMS LDAP Multicast POP3/S Quartz Restlet RMI SAP Many more Connectors + easy to create own Connectors Seite 45

46 Connectivity Several Proprietary Connectors available, for instance: Seite 46

47 OSGi Support? OSGi adds another complexity to building applications. [...] OSGi is a great specification for middleware vendors, but a terrible specification for the end user. Ross Mason, MuleSoft, November Seite 47

48 DSLs XML Seite 48

49 Code Example Seite 49

50 Live Demo Mule in Action Seite 50

51 Mule Studio Seite 51

52 Mule Studio Pro Visual Designer for Mule Flows Visual Live Monitoring Vice versa Editing (Code generation vs. coding by hand) Simple Eclipse plugin Just Mule Intuitive GUI Contra Proprietary Subscription required for many enterprise features (such as monitoring) Seite 52

53 Agenda 1) Systems Integration 2) Integration Frameworks 3) Spring Integration 4) Mule ESB 5) Apache Camel 6) And the Winner is Seite 53

54 DSLs XML (Not production-ready yet) Seite 54

55 Connectivity SQL Twitter JMX File AWS RMI CXF HTTP MongoDB TCP FTP RSS Akka Netty Bean-Validation LDAP Atom Lucene AMQP SMTP MQ JDBC XSLT IRC Jetty jclouds EJB Quartz JMS Many more Components + easy to create own Components Seite 55

56 Community Mailing Lists? Blogs? Articles? Conference talks? ESBs? Jobs? Seite 56

57 Community Mailing Lists? Blogs? Articles? Conference talks? ESBs? Jobs?... Even JBoss new ESB SwitchYard uses Camel inside! Seite 57

58 Code Example Seite 58

59 Code Example Seite 59

60 Live Demo Apache Camel in Action Seite 60

61 Tool Support Fuse IDE vs. Talend Open Studio for ESB Seite 61

62 Fuse IDE Seite 62

63 Fuse IDE Pro Visual Designer for Camel routes Visual Live Monitoring (for debugging, browsing, tracing) Vice versa Editing (code generation vs. coding by-hand) Just a simple Eclipse-Plugin Just Camel Intuitive GUI Export of route diagrams JUnit Test Wizard (generates scaffolding for tests) Contra Proprietary Subscription required Only XML DSL (this is not really a contra, because only Camel offers other DSLs) Seite 63

64 Talend Open Studio for ESB Seite 64

65 Talend Open Studio for ESB Pro Visual Designer for Camel routes Visual Live Monitoring Open Source (at github) Community Edition (not all features) Zero Coding Contra Zero Coding Only Java DSL (plus a lot of boilerplate code) No vice versa code editing (only code generation) No intuitive user interface => no simple Eclipse plugin => based on Eclipse, but it is more an own product (1GB) => full ESB only Seite 65

66 Agenda 1) Systems Integration 2) Integration Frameworks 3) Spring Integration 4) Mule ESB 5) Apache Camel 6) And the Winner is Seite 66

67 And the Winner is... Integration Mule ESB Seite 67

68 When to use? Integration Mule ESB Seite 68

69 When to use? Spring Project Typical JVM Technologies No additional Framework Integration Mule ESB Seite 69

70 When to use? Integration One of the available proprietary Connectors is required Mule ESB Seite 70

71 When to use? Integration Mule ESB In all other Cases Seite 71

72 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Seite 72

73 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Integration Connectivity Routing Transformation Seite 73

74 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Integration Connectivity Routing Transformation Spring Integration vs. Mule ESB vs. Apache Camel Seite 74

75 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Seite 75

Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Integration Connectivity

76 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Integration Connectivity Routing Transformation Middleware Product Integration Business Process Management Business Activity Monitoring Registry / Repository Rules Engine Seite 76

77 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Integration Connectivity Routing Transformation Middleware Product Integration Business Process Management Business Activity Monitoring Registry / Repository Rules Engine Seite 77

Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Apache ServiceMix, Mule ESB, WSO2 ESB vs.

78 Alternatives for Systems Integration No Tool Integration Framework Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Low High Complexity of Integration Apache ServiceMix, Mule ESB, WSO2 ESB vs. IBM Message Broker, IBM ESB, Oracle ESB, webmethods ESB Middleware Product Integration Business Process Management Business Activity Monitoring Registry / Repository Rules Engine Seite 78

79 Did you get the Key Messages? Seite 79

80 Key Messages Do not reinvent the integration wheel! There are some good alternatives for Integration! Often an ESB is the wrong Choice! Seite 80

81 Did you get the Key Messages? Seite 81

82 Become a Part of the Open Source Community Seite 82

MaibornWolff et al: Email: kai.waehner@mwea.

83 Thank you for your Attention. Any Questions? Integration or Mule ESB or = Smart EAI MaibornWolff et al: kai.waehner@mwea.de Blog:

Systems Integration in the Cloud Era. Kai Wähner, MaibornWolff et al GmbH

Systems Integration in the Cloud Era Kai Wähner, MaibornWolff et al GmbH Kai Wähner (MaibornWolff et al GmbH, Munich, Germany) Main Tasks Evaluation of Technologies and Products Requirements Engineering