The MED Biodiversity Protection Know ledge Platform

Transcription

1 The MED Biodiversity Protection Know ledge Platform Em anuele Mancosu/Sonsoles San Rom án Europ ean Topic Centre University of Malaga (ETC-UMA) Brid g in g th e Scie n ce -Practice-Policy Ga p in Me d ite rra n e a n Biod ive rsity Prote ction 25 October 20 17, Barcelona MED Biodiversity Protection Community 1

2 PANACeA objectives Aim of the platform as m ain tool to synthetize a n d d isse m in a te scie n tific kn o w le d g e a n d best practice Biodiversity protection efforts by the MED Com m unity of projects: Monitoring protocols on clim ate change and m a rin e litte r Managem ent of Posidonia and beach dunes New technologies for water m onitoring Governance models for fisheries and w e tla n d s. 3

3 MED Biodiversity Protection Knowledge Platform 4

4 MED Biodiversity Protection Knowledge Platform General overview Inputs from MPs by type Synergies with Modular partners Synergies with Axis Sustainable tourism Synergies with the MED programme 5

5 MED Platform implementation Conceptual model - functionalities Conceptual model tools/modules selected I. Search interface I. Search Engine II. Metadata information II. Map Viewer III. Data preview III. Metadata catalogue IV. Data access and/or download IV. Document viewer V. Access to restricted data V. Communication tool VI. Communication with interested users VI. Publishing/upload tool Support the definition on what is a priority and what is not: Geodatabase, geographic data, tabular data 6

6 MED Platform modules Tools versus Software solutions I. Search engine II. Map Viewer III. Metadata catalogue IV. Document viewer V. Communication tool VI. Publishing/upload tool How good is a certain software solution at providing certain functionality? What offers the highest degree and quality of integration achieved among the selected software solutions to provide a coherent user experience? How complex are the configuration, integration and customization, to match budget available and project deadlines? According to the data received from the community! e.g. pilot sites of Biodiversity community 7

7 MED Platform search engine examples 8

8 MED Platform data viewer examples 9

9 MED Platform modules assessment Search engine Functionality Usability Documentation Installation Reliability Average score CKAN ,8 ESRI geoportal ,2 GeoNetwork ,6 GeoNode ,6 Data viewer Functionality Usability Documentation Installation Reliability Average score CKAN ,8 GeoNetwork ,8 GeoNode ,8 10

10 MED Platform metadata catalogue Tools toward software solutions I. Search Engine II. Map Viewer III. Metadata catalogue IV. Document viewer V. Communication tool VI. Publishing/upload tool Contents Introduction 1. Definitions 2. What do we have? 2.1 Metadata schemas 2.2 Keywords thesauri 3. Schema implementation and compatibility 3.1 Schema comparison 3.2 Metadata profile 11

11 MED Platform metadata concept Metadata: set of elements that describe a resource Metadata schema: define fields and structure of the resource information e.g. ISO 19115/19139 Metadata keywords: free text or established by a controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) e.g. GEMET, KEEP Spatial data requirements? Interreg MED requirements? Other projects requirements (e.g. BluetourMED)? Where is the compromise? Software Storage Creation Import Export CKAN (with plugins) Geonetwork (with plugins) Geonode (with plugins) Own schema supporting DCAT-AP 1.1 and the most relevant fields from ISO XML Any schema can be stored Own schema supporting most relevant fields from ISO XML Own schema ISO XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO XML, SensorML Own schema DCAT-AP 1.1 DCAT- JSON, ISO XML ISO XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO XML, SensorML ISO XML (subset) ISO 19139, DCAT RDF ISO XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO XML, SensorML, DCAT RDF Atom, NASA DIF XML, Dublin Core XML, ebrim XML, FGDC XML, ISO XML 12

12 MED Platform physical implementation Option 1 Option 2 13

13 MED Platform entry page - examples 14

14 MED Platform data visualization options Navigation through address bar Metadata information License information 15

15 MED Platform potential use - examples POSBEMED France Italy Spain Greece Cyprus Distribution of the marine Angiosperm Posidonia oceanica and Zostera sp. in the Mediterranean, P. Panayiotides, HCM R 16

16 Aggregation of site data to national extent data Source: MWO

17 MED Platform potential use - examples Human Pressure Indicator 18

18 Cumulative pressure on pilot sites 19

19 Cumulative pressure on pilot sites on-going 20

20 Pilot Protected areas and participating sites 21

21 MED Platform data policy OBJECTIVE: regulating and promoting data resulting from the modular projects in axis 3.2. including data access, data sharing and data utilization of results of the MED Biodiversity Protection Community. Data copyright should be correctly cited when used to produce new knowledge, with an open source policy that does not allow commercial use nor sub-licensing as Interreg MED programme stated in the Programme Manual: Standard for activities and productions. Contents A. Introduction (PANACeA) B. Scope C. Terms and conditions (data policy) D. Access and availability (Data distribution) E. Restrictions F. Copyrights G. No Commercial Use H. No Sub-licensing or Redistribution I. License and Attribution J. Disclaimer of warranty K. Contact Information Draft prepared by ETC-UMA, and circulated among partners 22

22 Next steps: PANACeA MED platform PANACeA platform developments and knowledge exchanges about: Geoportals (AMAre..) Spatial data standards (EMODnet ) Metadata standards Other 20 November 2017 Beta version of the platform December

23 MED Biodiversity Protection Community