Copper-based Broadband Solutions

Transcription

1 Copper-based Broadband Solutions VDSL, FTTB, FTTC and coax August 2017

2 Iskratel Group Competent and credible global integrator of infocommunications solutions 70 years of experience 30 locations worldwide 900 employees Customers in 50 countries EU-based R&D and own manufacturing facilities We leverage our ICT expertise in delivering integrated solutions across telco, transport, public safety and energy industries. Iskratel headquarters in Kranj, Slovenia, EU Slide No. 1

3 TELCO We enable the most favourable way to network modernisation with integrated and proven solutions, using our own and our partners' products. PUBLIC SAFETY We integrate our solutions, based on extremely reliable platforms, into all areas of public safety within the communities and industry verticals. TRANSPORT We aim to become one of the leading solution providers of infocommunications and smart infrastructures, improving safety and efficiency with innovative and reliable solutions. PUBLIC SAFETY TELCO ENERGY We empower mission-critical environments with solutions for operational communications and control systems from day-to-day operations to emergency responses in critical situations. TRANSPORT ENERGY Slide No. 2

4 Iskratel Broadband-Networks Portfolio P2P GE/FE FTTH GPON FTTH VDSL from CO FTTC and FTTB Coax integration Service awareness Open broadband access Public VoIP Corporate VoIP Fibre-based broadband Copper-based broadband Software-defined broadband Voice modernisation FTTH home gateways DSL home gateways Universal home gateways Customer-premises equipment SI3000 Lumia SI3000 MSAN SI3000 Peso Broadband access and aggregation Outdoor and indoor cabinets Transport and backhaul Infrastructure and transport Slide No. 3

5 Iskratel Copper-based Broadband Central office VDSL2 ADSL2+ POTS DSL from central office 20 Mbps per user P2P/GPON fibre VDSL2 FTTB/dp with VDSL or Eth 100 Mbps per user P2P/GPON fibre VDSL2 Vectoring FTTC with VDSL 50 Mbps per user SI3000 Lumia SI3000 Lumia ODU outdoor cabinet Innbox CPE Slide No. 4

6 Iskratel Coax-based Broadband Central office GPON fibre DOCSIS CMTS at remote location 1 Gbps per group GPON fibre DOCSIS CMTS at remote cabinet 1 Gbps per group SI3000 Lumia GPON OLT DOCSIS Access Hub Mini CMTS DOCSIS CPE Slide No. 5

7 DSL from central office Slide No. 6

8 DSL from Central Office VDSL2 ADSL2+ POTS DSL from central office 20 Mbps per user SI3000 Lumia Innbox CPE Easy and complete reuse of existing copper infrastructure Scalable solution for all customer densities Very low investment Fast service activation Slide No. 7

9 DSL from Central Office: Relevant Products Central office: SI3000 Lumia Scalable multi-service broadband access and aggregation VDSL2/ADSL2+/vectoring, P2P/GPON FTTH, POTS/ISDN State-of-the-art, service-aware SDN platform for residential, business, and cloud services and apps Customer premises: Innbox home gateways DSL gateways Innbox V45 and Innbox V51 VDSL2/ADSL2+ w/ vectoring, FE/GE Ethernet, 3G/LTE Universal gateway Innbox V60-U VDSL2/ADSL2+, FE/GE/GPON fibre, FE/GE Ethernet, 3G/LTE Complete home-networking capabilities Slide No. 8

10 VDSL Vectoring Slide No. 9

11 Influence of Interference on DSL Speed Real life shows big influence of interference between copper pairs in the same cable on ADSL line speed Copper pair Downstream speed Upstream speed Old pair 1,369 Mb/s 856 kb/s New pair 4,180 Mb/s 944 kb/s Slide No. 10

12 VDSL2 Vectoring Towards the magic number: 100 Mbps Can operators really achieve 100 Mbps on existing copper lines? 100 Mbps allows delivery of competitive services and meets national broadband targets, which typically call for 100 Mbps by 2020 Slide No. 11

13 Lumia and VDSL Vectoring Vectoring employs the coordination of transmitted signals to reduce crosstalk and improve performance Vectoring uses active noise cancellation much like noise-cancelling headphones Vectoring cancels FEXT generated by a group of near-end transceivers and interfering with the far-end transceivers Measure noise Estimate crosstalk 3 3 Generate "anti-noise" Slide No. 12

14 VDSL Vectoring in SI3000 Lumia Building blocks of system-level VDSL vectoring Lumia with vectoring backplane 64-port VDSL2 subscriber blade 256-port VDSL2 vectoring engine Vectoring-enabled CPE Single shelf supports two times 256-port vectoring Slide No. 13

15 Fibre to the Building (FTTB) and Fibre to the Cabinet (FTTC) Slide No. 14

16 Rate [Mbps] Can VDSL2 Meet the Digital Agenda? EU agenda 2020: 30 Mb/s for all users Length [m] 17a DS 17a US 8b DS 8b US Length 17a DS 17a US 8b DS 8b US 0 100,174 60,114 60,897 14, ,174 60,114 60,902 14, ,174 60,114 60,906 14, ,034 53,529 58,611 14, ,123 30,444 48,940 12, ,359 11,393 39,492 8,922 1,000 41,778 5,923 32,418 4,982 1,100 37,085 3,856 30,132 3,332 1,200 33,208 2,067 27,845 1,681 1,400 21,986 1,137 1,600 18,659 1,110 1,800 16,053 1,100 2,000 13,546 1,085 2,200 11,227 1,052 2,400 9,384 1,033 2,600 7,868 1,030 2,800 6, ,000 5, ,200 4, ,400 3, ,600 2, ,750 2, Slide No. 15

17 Shortening the Local Loop Before......and after Slide No. 16

18 FTTB/dp and FTTC P2P/GPON fibre VDSL2 FTTB/dp with VDSL or Eth 100 Mbps per user P2P/GPON fibre VDSL2 Vectoring FTTC with VDSL 50 Mbps per user SI3000 Lumia SI3000 Lumia ODU outdoor cabinet Reuse of existing (in-building) copper infrastructure Complete range of access (local-loop) technologies Cost-effective upgrade to FTTx Innbox CPE Improved bandwidth and quality of service Slide No. 17

19 FTTB/dp and FTTC: Relevant Products Central office and cabinets: SI3000 Lumia Scalable multi-service broadband access and aggregation VDSL2/ADSL2+/vectoring, P2P/GPON FTTH, POTS/ISDN State-of-the-art, service-aware SDN platform for residential, business, and cloud services and apps Outdoor/indoor cabinets: ODU family Various sizes for all densities: urban, suburban, rural Included batteries, distribution frame, splitters Customer premises: Innbox home gateways DSL gateways Innbox V45 and Innbox V51 Universal gateway Innbox V60-U Slide No. 18

20 ODU Family of FTTB/C Outdoor and Indoor Cabinets ODU-SI I ODU-SI M ODU-M2 ODU-XS 128 VDSL2 128 POTS 576 VDSL2 576 POTS 320 VDSL2 320 POTS 1216 VDSL2 576 P2P FTTH 456 POTS 128 Vectorised VDSL P2P FTTH 48 Slide No. 19

21 FTTC Outdoor Cabinet ODU-SI I Up to 576 VDSL2 or POTS ports 10-slot Lumia chassis MDF with splitters 24-hour backup for POTS Steel construction IP55 protection Vandal-resistant W D H (mm) Wide temperature range From 40 C to +50 C Slide No. 20

22 FTTC Outdoor Cabinet ODU-SI M Up to 320 VDSL2 or POTS ports 6-slot or 2-slot Lumia chassis MDF with splitters 24-hour backup for POTS Steel construction IP55 protection Vandal-resistant W D H (mm) / /1800 Wide temperature range From 40 C to +50 C Slide No. 21

23 FTTC Outdoor Cabinet ODU-M2 Up to 576 VDSL2, 1216 POTS or 456 P2P FTTH ports 20-slot Lumia chassis Spacious and flexible MDF with splitters 24-hour backup for POTS Steel construction Vandal-resistant Cooling with heat exchanger Simple maintenance Cold start Min. heat exchanger power C Cost-optimised solution Slide No. 22

24 FTTB FTTC FTTdp FTTC/FTTB Outdoor/Indoor Cabinet ODU-XS Fast and simple installation Instant service activation Various deployment options Slide No. 23

25 FTTC/FTTB Solution with ODU-XS Ideal for (remote) villages with ~ households Reuse of existing copper infrastructure Uplink: POTS and power supply from CO Downlink: VDSL2 for high-bandwidth services to end users GPON or GE P2P optical uplink Possible cascading of cabinets Spacious distribution frame for up to 600 pairs Slide No. 24

26 Extra Small Outdoor/Indoor Cabinet ODU-XS 128 Up to 48 FE/GE FTTH or 128 VDSL2/ADSL2+ ports Two-slot Lumia chassis Spacious and flexible MDF/ODF Fan-based cooling From 40 C to +50 C Possible chaining/cascading AC or remote power supply Mountable on a pedestal, wall or pole Easy installation and maintenance W D H (mm) /1225 Slide No. 25

27 Integration with Coax-Based Last Mile and Migration to GPON Slide No. 26

28 Iskratel Coax-based Broadband GPON fibre DOCSIS CMTS at remote location 1 Gbps per group GPON fibre DOCSIS CMTS at remote cabinet 1 Gbps per group SI3000 Lumia GPON OLT DOCSIS Access Hub Mini CMTS Reuse of existing (in-building) coaxial infrastructure Reuse of existing (DOCSIS-based) management system Cost-effective migration towards FTTH Improved bandwidth and quality of service DOCSIS CPE Slide No. 27

29 Unification of DOCSIS GPON Management GPON fibre GPON NMS GPON OLT GPON ONT Management and provisioning system DOCSIS NMS CMTS DOCSIS DOCSIS CPE Reuse of existing DOCSIS management system Simple migration of DOCSIS provisioning to GPON Provisioning of OLT and ONT integrated into DOCSIS management Slide No. 28

30 Coax-based Broadband: Relevant Products Central office: SI3000 Lumia Scalable multi-service broadband access and aggregation P2P/GPON FTTH, VDSL2/ADSL2+/vectoring, POTS/ISDN State-of-the-art, service-aware SDN platform for residential, business, and cloud services and apps Remote mini CMTS: Teleste DOCSIS Access Hub (DAH) FTTH experience over coax Wide availability of subscriber modems Smooth evolution to distributed CMTS architecture Robust, EMC-protected, fan-free design Slide No. 29

31 Migration from DOCSIS Coax to GPON Fibre Slide No. 30

32 GPON vs. DOCSIS 3.1 in Six Simple Points Six truths about selecting the right step forward (and a bonus one) Point #1: Investment and return Point #2: Sustainable investment cycle Point #3: Operating and maintenance costs Point #4: Services and revenue Point #5: Migration to PON Point #6: Migration to DOCSIS 3.1 Point #7: (Bonus) Slide No. 31

33 Point #1 Investment and Return Fibre deployment yields lower TCO and better return at about the same cost as migration from DOCSIS 3.0 to 3.1 CAPEX per bit of bandwidth (cost per capacity) is lower for GPON GPON throughput is less expensive than DOCSIS 3.x DS frequencies for DOCSIS are licensable; e.g. for 1 Gbps, 24 EuroDocsis channels (50 Mbps each) are needed, yielding 24 times the license (per optical node) GPON's next step (XG/NG-PON) indisputably better than DOCSIS 3.1 DOCSIS 3.x is problematic in terms of upstream (DS:US=5:1) and cannot challenge GPON (2:1); increase of DOCSIS' upstream requires more nodes and more active equipment (massive investment on top of DOCSIS 3.1) Slide No. 32

34 Point #2 Sustainable Investment Cycle Sticking to DOCSIS is a constant investment into weak future prospects DOCSIS 3.x requires a constant investment with long return (licenses!) Fibre is future proof, coax is not Capacities of copper coax are approaching the theoretical limits Capacity of fibre infrastructure may last for decades: additional capacity is only a wavelength away DOCSIS 3.1 (10G/2G) may offer more than GPON (2.5G/1.25G) today but fibre infrastructure allows reuse for XG/NG-PON with better capacity than DOCSIS 3.1 Co-deployment (of coax+fibre) is not a sustainable solution it only delays the inevitable migration from DOCSIS 3.0 to fibre Slide No. 33

35 On points #1 and #2 Comparative TCO Analysis From year 3 on, PON with RF overlay provides a significantly better TCO DOCSIS requires continuous investment in additional channels to keep up with growing traffic consumption Normalised TCO for RFoG (24-ch DOCSIS 3.0) and xpon RFoG xpon, RF overlay Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Source: Bell Labs Consulting, 2016 Slide No. 34

36 On points #1 and #2 Comparative TCO Analysis 5-year TCO per household connected 37 % lower for PON with RF overlay, 52 % lower for PON w/o RF overlay 1.20 Normalised 5-year TCO, 64-split PON OPEX CPE CAPEX Hub CAPEX RFoG, 24-ch D3.0, low split RFoG, 24-ch D3.1, mid split xpon, RF overlay xpon, IPTV Source: Bell Labs Consulting, 2016 Slide No. 35

37 Point #3 Operating and Maintenance Costs Maintenance costs for DOCSIS are higher than for PON DOCSIS requires maintenance of active amplifiers, while PON is passive Copper coax is sensitive to temperature variation DOCSIS requires tuning of signal amplifiers several times per year PON infrastructure requires no maintenance Operating costs for DOCSIS are higher than for PON DOCSIS requires power supply for active amplifiers, while PON is passive DOCSIS requires controlled (and cooled) locations for active amplifiers Passive PON infrastructure incurs no operating costs Slide No. 36

38 Point #4 Services and Revenue PON enables a wider range of services, generates more revenue Nonlinear experience of TV (i.e. unicast-based VoD and time-shifted TV) reduces the value of classical broadcast TV distribution, and of "classical" coax-based systems High asymmetry of DOCSIS 3.x is an issue (DOCSIS DS:US=5:1, GPON 2:1) that reduces its usefulness for more symmetrical services (e.g. cloud, videocomm, gaming, business services, IoT, community sources, CCTV) Rollout of full-duplex DOCSIS (FDX) not expected before 2019*, and will require massive new investments on top of DOCSIS 3.1 GPON OLTs evolve with SDN and NFV, hence they inherently enable new services (OTT, cloud, VoD, gaming etc.) for new revenue * Source: Heavy Reading report, 2017 Slide No. 37

39 Point #5 Migration to PON Migration to PON is sustainable and non-disruptive Migration to passive optical network is similar to coaxial only the medium is different Sustainable migration from DOCSIS to PON CATV RF overlay protects existing investments into TV head end Integration of service provisioning with a provisioning proxy End-to-end service visibility and provisioning is guaranteed (from OLT to ONT) Only two major steps of migration to PON 2017: Upgrade to GPON 2022: Upgrade to XG/NG-PON Slide No. 38

40 Point #6 Migration to DOCSIS 3.1 Migration to DOCSIS 3.1 is a continuous disruption DOCSIS 3.1 is incompatible with DOCSIS 3.0 new CMTS, new modems Migration to DOCSIS 3.1 is a perpetual investment (licensable frequencies) Six disruptive steps of migration to DOCSIS : Network segmentation and CMTS capacity upgrade 2018: Upgrade to DOCSIS 3.1 for DS service capacities 2020: Upgrade and rebuild for US service capacities 2022: Legacy RF TV shutdown, necessary migration to IPTV due to lack of spectrum 2023: Network re-segmentation (node splits) 2025: Complete saturation of US/DS channels... and an inevitable migration to PON Slide No. 39

41 Bonus Point #7 Customer Perception Never underestimate customers' perception and experience Customers' perception is simple: Fibre is the future Justified or not customers will always prefer fibre (to copper) if given a choice Your competition emphasises this too without fibre, you may get left behind If migrating to DOCSIS 3.1, consider the perception of service disruptions Any changes to frequency spectrum in order to improve data capacity affect/alter existing services (e.g. changed broadcast TV scheme, less analogue TV channels) and negatively impact customers' satisfaction Slide No. 40

42 Migration from DOCSIS Coax to GPON Fibre Before... SI3000 Lumia GPON OLT GPON fibre DOCSIS Access Hub Mini CMTS DOCSIS coax DOCSIS CPE CMTS at remote location 1 Gbps per group...and after SI3000 Lumia GPON OLT GPON fibre Passive optical splitter Innbox ONT GPON FTTH 2.4 Gbps per group Slide No. 41

43 Why Iskratel Broadband Solutions? Sustainable investment cycle New business models guarantee return of investment Increased revenue, reduced customer churn Support for wholesale and open-access models Extended life cycle with new services Decreased operating and maintenance expenses Slide No. 42

44 Selected Broadband Customers Slide No. 43

45 Visit youtube.com/iskratelsi3000 twitter.com/iskratel linkedin.com/company/iskratel facebook.com/iskratel Slide No. 44

46 Copper-based Broadband Solutions VDSL, FTTB and FTTC August 2017