BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
- Christine Morrison
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Proceeding to Consider Amendments to the Revised Right-Of-Way Rules Adopted by Decision Rulemaking SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) COMBINED OPENING COMMENTS AND PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT FRANK MCNULTY GLORIA ING Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) Gloria.Ing@sce.com Dated: May 3, 2017
2 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Proceeding to Consider Amendments to the Revised Right-Of-Way Rules Adopted by Decision Rulemaking SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) COMBINED OPENING COMMENTS AND PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Pursuant to the CPUC s direction on page 20 of Rulemaking , which was issued by the Commission on April 3, 2017, Southern California Edison Company (SCE) submits the combined opening comments and prehearing conference statement. 1 In terms of a prehearing conference statement, SCE provides the following statement: SCE was an active participation in Rulemaking , which led to the Commission amending the rights-of-way (ROW) rules in Decision No to accommodate Commercial Mobile Radio Service carriers (CMRS). As stated in SCE s Comments on the Proposed Decision of Commissioner Picker on the Order Granting Petition , filed March 9, 2017, SCE believes that workshops are necessary to understand the differences between (1) wireless technologies of CMRS providers as permitted in D , (2) fixed wireless technologies by Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) as permitted in D , (3) wireless attachments by CLECs as being contemplated in the rulemaking, and (4) the necessary and correct pricing model for CLEC wireless attachments, if approved by the Commission. SCE looks forward to participating in R The schedule on page 19 of R indicates that the opening comments and prehearing conference statement should be combined. 1
3 Below are the SCE s responses to the 22 questions identified in the April 3, 2017 rulemaking. The six questions raised in ALJ Kenney s May 1, 2017 ruling setting forth the prehearing conference largely appear to be encompassed in the 22 questions, as indicated by SCE below. 1. The matters set forth in Rule 6.2, including any objections to the preliminary scoping memo regarding the category of this proceeding, need for hearings, issues to be considered, and/or the schedule. Comments that include factual assertions must be verified in accordance with Rule SCE s RESPONSE: SCE has no objections to the preliminary scoping memo regarding the category of this proceeding, need for hearings, issues to be considered, or the schedule. 2. Whether it is in the public interest to apply the Revised ROW Rules adopted by D for CMRS carriers pole attachments to CLECs wireless pole attachments. SCE s RESPONSE: At this time, SCE does not take a position on this issue. SCE is interested in participating in this proceeding and assisting in the development of a robust record to determine whether it is in the public interest to apply Revised ROW Rules adopted by the Commission in D for CMRS carriers pole attachments to CLECs wireless pole attachments. 3. The specific amendments to the Revised ROW Rules that are necessary to provide CLECs with nondiscriminatory access to utility ROW for wireless pole attachments. Such amendments may include, but are not limited to, WIA s proposed amendments in Appendix A of this Order. SCE s RESPONSE: At this time, SCE does not offer any specific amendments to the Revised ROW Rules. 2 Question 1 from the May 1, 2017 ruling appears to be incorporated in Question 1 from the rulemaking. 2
4 4. A list and description all pole attachments covered by WIA s Petition, including (A) all wireline and wireless facilities and equipment; (B) the amount of pole space needed for such attachments; (C) the weight of such attachments; (D) the wind load of such attachments; and (E) the amount of pole space and pole load-bearing capacity (weight and wind load) that will be needed for all elements of a typical CLEC wireless pole installation. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes that WIA and CLECs should address item 4 so that parties can discuss in a workshop. 5. Whether existing Commission regulations for the design, construction, operation, inspection, and maintenance of CLECs wireless pole attachments, such as GO 95, adequately protect public safety, worker safety, and the reliability of co-located utility pole attachments (e.g., power lines and telephone lines). If not, the party s comments shall provide the following information: a) A detailed explanation regarding why existing regulations do not adequately protect safety and/or reliability. b) Whether the asserted threat to public safety and/or reliability is disproportionately associated with CLEC wireless pole attachments and, if so, why? c) Detailed proposal(s) to mitigate the threat(s), such as the text for a new GO 95 rule. The scope of new regulations, if any, is limited to wireless pole attachments and any other facilities installed on poles due to the presence of wireless pole attachments. SCE s RESPONSE: At this time, SCE is not aware of any supplemental regulations needed for CLECs wireless pole attachments. 6. A list and description of the services that CLECs may offer to the public (including other communications carriers) using pole attachments that are installed pursuant to amended Revised ROW Rules that may be adopted in this proceeding. Such services might include, but are not limited to, the following: a) Fixed wireless, point-to-multipoint service. b) CMRS. c) Wi-Fi service. d) Broadband wireless internet access service. e) Providing other carriers with access to, or interconnection with, wireless facilities and infrastructure. f) Providing backhaul service for other wireless carriers. 3
5 g) Other wireless and wireline services (list and describe). SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes that CLEC s are obliged to address items 6a-g so that parties can discuss in a workshop. Additionally, the term fixed wireless is undefined in the Revised ROW Rules and should be considered in this proceeding. 7. The specific Commission regulatory authority that a CLEC must possess to install wireless pole attachments pursuant to amended Revised ROW Rules that may be adopted in this proceeding, and an explanation as to why such regulatory authority is required. Such regulatory authority might include, for example, the following: a) CPCN to provide full facilities-based competitive local exchange service or limited facilities-based local exchange service. (1) Must a CPCN include explicit authority to install wireless pole attachments? Please explain your response and cite relevant provisions in the California Public Utilities Code, Commission decisions, and other controlling legal authority. b) An up-to-date WIR to provide facilities-based CMRS on file at the Commission. (1) Are there circumstances where a WIR is required in addition to a CPCN? If yes, please explain your response and cite relevant provisions in the California Public Utilities Code, Commission decisions, and other controlling legal authority. SCE s RESPONSE: Regarding 7a and 7b, SCE believes that a CLEC must have CPUC authority to install wireless pole attachments, whether such authority exists via a WIR, CPCN, or some other vehicle. Similar to how the CPUC defined Commercial Mobile Radio Service carriers in Section II of the ROW rules, the CPUC should amend the Revised ROW Rules to provide a definition for CLECs that would set forth the qualifications CLECs need under the ROW rules to seek access to poles in order to install wireless facilities. c) Final environmental impact report, negative declaration, or other document(s) required by CEQA. SCE s RESPONSE: Please refer to Conclusion of Law 40 on page 136 and Section 4 of D , which SCE believes would also be applicable for CLECs. 4
6 8. Whether the per-foot fee for CMRS pole installations should apply identically to CLEC wireless pole installations, including a CLEC s wireline attachments installed on the same pole as the CLEC s wireless pole attachments. Any party that contends the per-pole fee should apply to a CLEC s wireline attachments installed on the same pole as the CLEC s wireless attachments shall address the following matters: a) Why it is reasonable for a CLEC to pay a per-pole fee for wireline attachments on the same pole as the CLECs wireless attachments, when a CMRS carrier is required by the Revised ROW Rules to pay a per-foot fee for all of its pole attachments, including any wireline attachments. b) How to distinguish the elements of a CLEC pole installation that are subject to the per-pole fee adopted by D and the elements that are subject to the per-foot fee adopted by D SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes CLECs should respond to items 8a and 8-b (above) in detail and the issue of the CMRS per-foot fee for wireless attachments must be addressed in a workshop. 9. Whether the per-pole fee that was adopted by D for CLEC pole attachments that are used to provide fixed wireless, point-to-multipoint service should remain in effect, or whether all CLEC wireless pole attachments (including attachments used to provide fixed wireless, point-tomultipoint services) should be subject to the per-foot fee adopted by D SCE s RESPONSE: Similar to Items 6 and 8, SCE believes CLEC s should respond in detail and that Item 9 must be addressed in a workshop. 10. Whether a Commission decision to amend the Revised ROW Rules to apply to CLEC s wireless pole attachments is exempt from the CEQA and, if so, why. Any assertion that CEQA does not apply must cite the relevant statues and/or regulations where the exemption is listed. Conversely, any assertion that CEQA does apply must (A) cite the relevant statues and/or regulations that show this, and (B) list the steps that need to occur under CEQA before the Commission can amend the Revised ROW Rules. SCE s RESPONSE: Please refer to Conclusion of Law 40 on page 136 and Section 4 of D , which SCE believes would also be applicable for CLECs. 3 SCE believes that the reference to D was an error. 5
7 11. Whether a hearing is needed. Any party that requests a hearing must (A) identify the disputed material facts, (B) summarize the evidence that the party intends to offer at a hearing, and (C) provide a schedule for all hearing-related events. 4 SCE s RESPONSE: At this time, SCE does not believe that evidentiary hearings are needed but reserves the right to request hearings if factual disputes exist. 12. A proposed schedule for this proceeding, including all major events contemplated by the party such as additional written comments, workshops, workshop reports, mediation, discovery cutoff, evidentiary hearings and/or briefs, requests for oral argument, etc. 5 SCE s RESPONSE: SCE suggests the attached schedule which is similar to the one included in the ALJ s Ruling issued February 9, 2015 in R be considered for use in this proceeding. Event Public Workshop Schedule Date-Timeframe Scoping Memo Issued Day 0 Any party who plans to participate in the workshops s notice of their planned participation to the service list. Public Workshops - Northern California SED places public workshop notice in the Commission s Daily Calendar. After the initial workshop notice, SED will place. Notice(s) of all additional workshop meetings in the Commission s Daily Calendar. Day 5 Day (Time and Location TBD) Public Workshops Southern California Day (Time and Location TBD) Public Workshops Northern California Day (Time and Location TBD) Workshop Report filed and served. Day 96 4 Question 3 from the May 1, 2017 ruling appears to be incorporated in this Question 11 from the rulemaking. 5 Questions 4 and 5 from the May 1, 2017 ruling appears to be incorporated in this Question 12 from the rulemaking. 6
8 Opening comments on Workshop Report filed and served. Day 116 Reply comments filed and served. Day 126 Deadline for filing motions for evidentiary hearings or alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Any such motion may request hearings or ADR, but not both. Deadline for filing responses to any motions for evidentiary hearings or ADR. Evidentiary hearings or ADR, if needed. Day 131 Day 138 TBD 13. If not included in the response to Item 4, above, a description of all types of pole attachments installed by CLECs for radiofrequency transport services, an explanation of how these attachments differ if at all from the attachments that are the subject of Petition , and a best estimate of the number of California poles that currently have such attachments. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes that CLECs should address item 13 so that parties can discuss in a workshop. 14. If not included in the response to Item 5, above, an explanation of whether pole attachments installed by CLCs for radiofrequency transport services present any additional or unique issues pertaining to safety or reliability. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes that CLECs should address item 14 so that parties can discuss in a workshop. 15. The estimated number of existing utility poles that will have CLEC wireless pole attachments installed over the next ten years (through 2027) as a result of this rulemaking proceeding. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes that CLECs should address item 15 so that parties can discuss in a workshop. 16. The estimated number of existing utility poles that will have to be replaced with larger and/or stronger poles over the next ten years (through 2027), as a result of this rulemaking proceeding, in order to provide sufficient space and/or load-bearing capacity for CLECs wireless pole attachments. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes that CLECs should address item 16 so that parties can discuss in a workshop. 7
9 17. The estimated number of new utility poles (not replacement poles) that will be installed over the next ten years (through 2027), as a result of this rulemaking proceeding, by CLECs that have CPCNs to provide facilitiesbased local exchange services. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE believes that CLECs should address item 17 so that parties can discuss in a workshop. 18. Whether there is sufficient space and load-bearing capacity on the existing stock of utility poles to support ubiquitous, competitive, and affordable telecommunications services, including wireline services, wireless services, and broadband. SCE s RESPONSE: In those cases where there is insufficient space or load bearing capacity on existing utility poles for wireline or wireless telecommunication attachments, SCE believes the correct approach is to replace the pole or deny access. 19. Whether the provisions of the ROW Rules that require CLECs, CMRS carriers, and CATV corporations to pay for most, if not all, of the cost of replacing existing poles with stronger and/or larger poles to support additional telecommunications attachments pose a barrier to entry. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE does not believe that replacing existing poles with stronger and/or larger poles to support additional telecommunication attachments (wireline or wireless) poses a barrier to market entry and that it is inappropriate for electric utility ratepayers to subsidize such cost associated with non-utility attachments. 20. Whether the provisions of the ROW Rules that provide access to surplus space on public utility poles (and other public utility ROW) on a first come, first served basis are a barrier to achieving the State s goal of universal access to affordable, high quality broadband telecommunications services. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE does not believe that the first come, first served feature of the Revised ROW Rules is a barrier to achieving the State s goal of universal access to affordable, high quality broadband telecommunications services. These provisions are longstanding and appear to be the fairest method in a competitive market. 8
10 21. Whether urban streetscapes can accommodate more pole attachments, the replacement of existing poles with larger poles, and possibly more poles. SCE s RESPONSE: SCE recognizes there is sensitivity by cities, counties, etc. regarding the replacement of existing poles with larger poles, and that additional, larger poles may impact urban streetscapes with the installation of additional CLEC attachments. However, this matter seems to be best addressed by cities, counties, and incoming CLECs through the city s and county s permitting processes in situations where a CLEC s intended attachment(s) would require larger and/or additional poles. 22. Any other matters that are relevant to the scope, schedule, and/or conduct of this rulemaking proceeding. SCE s RESPONSE: With respect to the recommended workshops and recommended schedule (above), SCE suggests these meetings be facilitated and chaired by the SED s Electric Safety and Reliability Branch, with assistance from co-chairs if/as-needed. Also, these workshops should be publicly noticed in advance of the workshops on the Commission s Daily Calendar and include teleconference capability. Respectfully submitted, FRANK MCNULTY GLORIA ING /s/ Gloria Ing By: Gloria Ing Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) Gloria.Ing@sce.com May 3,
11 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Proceeding to Consider Amendments to the Revised Right-Of-Way Rules Adopted by Decision Rulemaking CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) COMBINED OPENING COMMENTS AND PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT on all parties identified on the attached service list for R Service was effected by transmitting copies via to all parties who have provided an address and by placing copies in sealed envelopes and causing such envelopes to be delivered by hand or by overnight courier to the offices of the Assigned ALJ(s) or other addressee(s). ALJ Timothy Kenney CPUC 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA Executed on May 3, 2017, at Rosemead, California. /s/ Olivia Gutierrez Olivia Gutierrez Legal Administrative Assistant SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
12 CPUC - Service Lists - R Page 1 of 3 5/3/2017 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R CPUC - ORDER GRANTIN FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: MAY 1, 2017 DOWNLOAD THE COMMA-DELIMITED FILE ABOUT COMMA-DELIMITED FILES Back to Service Lists Index Parties SUZANNE TOLLER ATTORNEY DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 800 SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION (WIA) FORMERLY PCIA Information Only BRUCE SMITH IGOR GRINBERG GRC & REGULATORY SUPPORT REGULATORY AFFAIRS PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ONLY ONLY ONLY, CA ONLY, CA INNA VINOGRADOV ICOMMLAW ONLY ONLY, CA MARIA BROWNE ATTORNEY DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP ONLY ONLY, DC DARAH FRANKLIN GOOGLE INC. D. ZACHARY CHAMP WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION
13 CPUC - Service Lists - R Page 2 of 3 5/3/ MASSACHUSETTS AVE., STE MONTGOMERY STREET, STE. 500 WASHINGTON, DC ALEXANDRIA, VA FOR: WIA (FORMERLY PCIA) GLORIA M. ING KAREN CHUNG SR ATTORNEY MGR - PROJECT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CA ROSEMEAD, CA FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY CASE ADMINISTRATION JESUS.G ROMAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VERIZON 8631 RUSH STREET SAND CANYON AVE. D201 ROSEMEAD, CA IRVINE, CA WILLIAM K. SANDERS MARGARET TOBIAS DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TOBIAS LAW OFFICE CITY HALL RM PENNSYLVANIA AVE 1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (SAN FRANCISCO) DAVID J. MILLER MICHELLE CHOO AVP - SR. LEGAL COUNSEL ASSISTANT AT&T SERVICES, INC. AT&T SERVICES, INC. 430 BUSH STREET, ROOM BUSH STREET, 3ND FL. NO. 9 SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA THOMAS SELHORST JAMES W. TOMLINSON SENIOR PARALEGAL DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP AT&T CALIFORNIA, INC. 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE BUSH STREET, 3RD FL, NO. 14 SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA SARAH DEYOUNG ANITA TAFF-RICE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ATTORNEY CALTEL ICOMMLAW 50 CALIFORNIA ST., STE PALOS VERDES, NO. 298 SAN FRANCISCO, CA WALNUT CREEK, CA State Service ALEXANDER J. ABRAMSON AROCLES AGUILAR BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH LEGAL DIVISION AREA ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA
14 CPUC - Service Lists - R Page 3 of 3 5/3/2017 CAMERON REED CAROLINA CONTRERAS COMMUNICATIONS AND WATER POLICY BRANCH OFFICE OF THE SAFETY ADVOCATE AREA AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: ORA FOR: OSA DOROTHY DUDA GLENN SEMOW EXECUTIVE DIVISION BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH ROOM 5116 AREA 3-F 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA MICHAEL C. AMATO MICHAEL MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH ROOM 3211 ROOM 3-F 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA TIMOTHY KENNEY TOVAH TRIMMING DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES LEGAL DIVISION ROOM 5015 ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) REPLY COMMENTS
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Proceeding to Consider Amendments to the Revised Right-Of-Way Rules Adopted by Decision 16-01-046. Rulemaking
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In The Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for Authority to Lease Certain Fiber Optic Cables to CELLCO
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities: Cerritos
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation into the November 2018 Submission of Southern California Edison Risk Assessment and Mitigation Phase I.18-11-006
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities: Eldorado-Lugo-Mohave
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E For a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities With Voltages
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U338-E)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Approval of Green Energy Programs. Application No. 18-09-015 NOTICE OF
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E for Authority to Lease Available Land at Walnut Substation
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF COMMUNICATION
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation into the November 2018 Submission of Southern California Edison Risk Assessment and Mitigation Phase. I.18-11-006
More informationJuly 1, 1999 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION
Donald A. Fellows, Jr. Manager of Revenue and Tariffs July 1, 1999 (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Notice of Proposed Construction of Facilities
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities With Voltages
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities With Voltages
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Amended Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Approval of Energy Efficiency Rolling Portfolio Business Plan.
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Authority To Increase Its Authorized Revenues For Electric Service In 2018,
More informationFILED :59 PM
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 E) for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide (i) full-facilities-based
More informationNovember 14, 2008 Advice Letter 2265-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 November 14, 2008 Advice Letter 2265-E Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. REPLY BRIEF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (March 19, 2009)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No. ER07-1034-002 REPLY BRIEF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (March 19, 2009)
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Evaluate Telecommunications Corporations Service Quality Performance and Consider Modification to Service
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Promote Policy and Program Coordination and Integration in Electric Utility Resource Planning. Order Instituting
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Approval of the Results of Its 2016 Energy Storage and Distribution Deferral
More information2015 General Rate Case
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: SCE-1 J. P. Shotwell (U -E) 01 General Rate Case Testimony Regarding Accessibility Issues Developed Jointly By SCE and Center for Accessible Technology Before the
More informationDEERE AFFIDAVIT Attachment FF
DEERE AFFIDAVIT Attachment FF Attachment FF consists of a Report and three Attachments. The Report and Attachments 1 and 2 to the Report are Public, Attachment 3 to the Report is Pacific Bell Proprietary
More informationUpdates and Modifications to Report
QUARTERLY COMPLIANCE REPORT (APRIL 2017) OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) REGARDING STATUS OF TRANSMISSION PROJECTS AND GENERATION INTERCONNECTION PROJECTS Pursuant to Commission Decision
More informationDecember 10, 2012 Advice Letter 2797-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor December 10, 2012 Advice Letter 2797-E Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations P O
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities: Leatherneck
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) The New Jersey Board of Public ) Utilities Petition for Delegated ) CC Docket No. 95-116 Authority to Implement
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF PCIA THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of AT&T Petition to Launch a Proceeding Concerning the TDM-to-IP Transition; Petition of the National Telecommunications
More informationNext Generation 911; Text-to-911; Next Generation 911 Applications. SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission)
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/29/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-25274, and on FDsys.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
More informationFrom: Laura Manz, Vice President of Market & Infrastructure Development
California Independent System Operator Corporation Memorandum To: ISO Board of Governors From: Laura Manz, Vice President of Market & Infrastructure Development Date: May 8, 2009 Re: Decision for Conditional
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Implement Electric Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plans Pursuant to Senate Bill 901 (2018). R.18-10-007 (Filed
More informationCALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL)
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL) (Date Filed / Received Stamp by CPUC Industry Division) Date AL served on parties: July 31, 2013 Company Name: AT&T California
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Access to Telecommunications Equipment and Services by Persons with Disabilities Petition for Rulemaking Filed by the
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) IP-Enabled Services ) WC Docket No. 04-36 ) E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service ) WC Docket No. 05-196 Providers
More informationBoard Meeting Notice and Agenda. July 12, :00 a.m.
Board Meeting Notice and Agenda July 12, 2018 10:00 a.m. Meeting location: State Personnel Board 801 Capitol Mall, Rm 150 Sacramento, CA 95814 Teleconference location: 505 Van Ness Ave Hearing Room C San
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN WIRELESS DEVICES WITH 3G CAPABILITIES AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Investigation No. 337-TA-800 COMPLAINANT INTERDIGITAL
More informationDecember 21, 1998 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL AND HAND DELIVERY
Alden Adkins Sr. V. P. and General Counsel BY ELECTRONIC MAIL AND HAND DELIVERY Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street,
More informationMay 17, Vikie Bailey-Goggins Oregon Public Utility Commission 550 Capitol St., NE Suite 215 Salem, OR Re: IC. Dear Ms.
Qwest 421 Southwest Oak Street Suite 810 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: 503-242-5420 Facsimile: 503-242-8589 e-mail: carla.butler@qwest.com Carla M. Butler Lead Paralegal May 17, 2010 Vikie Bailey-Goggins
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Revisions to Rules Authorizing the Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations in the 698-806 MHz Band Public Interest Spectrum
More informationSBC Long Distance Application - Personal Communications Industry Association Comments. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
SBC Long Distance Application - Personal Communications Industry Association Comments Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of Application by SBC Communications, Inc.,
More informationRESOLUTION NO. 14-R-
RESOLUTION NO. 14-R- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA DIRECTING AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY COMPRISING
More informationThe South Dakota Unified Certification Program Agreement. 700 Broadway Ave. Pierre, SD
The South Dakota Unified Certification Program Agreement 700 Broadway Ave. Pierre, SD 57501-2586 South Dakota Unified Certification Program Agreement The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT)
More informationBEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Seeks Comment on Improving Wireless Network Resiliency Through Encouraging
More informationMarch 1, 2013 Advice Letter 2840-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor March 1, 2013 Advice Letter 2840-E Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations P O Box
More informationSTATE OF MUNNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
STATE OF MUNNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION David C. Boyd Chair Phyllis A. Reha Commissioner J. Dennis O Brien Commissioner Thomas Pugh Commissioner Betsy Wergin Commissioner In
More informationDecember 5, 2012 Advice Letter 2441-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor December 5, 2012 Advice Letter 2441-E Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations P O
More information151 FERC 61,066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER DENYING REHEARING. (Issued April 23, 2015)
151 FERC 61,066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Norman C. Bay, Chairman; Philip D. Moeller, Cheryl A. LaFleur, Tony Clark, and Colette D. Honorable.
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 214 Application of Verizon New Jersey Inc. and Verizon New York Inc. to Discontinue Domestic Telecommunications
More informationEM&V Call. May 31, 2017
EM&V Call May 31, 2017 1 AGENDA Announcements & What s Coming Up? Updates Recent White Papers DR Proceeding (R.13-09-011) CAISO EE Business Plans (A.17-01-013) Legislation ANNOUNCEMENTS Business Forum
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Technology Transitions AT&T Petition to Launch a Proceeding Concerning the TDM-to-IP Transition Connect America Fund GN
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION ORDER
STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION The Citizens Utility Board and : The Environmental Defense Fund : : 14-0507 Proceeding to Adopt the Illinois Open Data : Access Framework. : By the Commission:
More informationRe: Filing of Windstream's Comments to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Case No. NNTRC
New Mexico Office of External Affairs 1660 Old Pecos Trail- Suite D Santa Fe; NM 87505 1:505.9559700 f:505.955.9699 windstream September 19, 2011 Executive Director Navajo Nation Telecommunications Regulatory
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON
ENTERED MAY 05 2nl1 In the Matter of BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON CP 1503 CP 1465 ZA YO GROUP, LLC and ZA YO BANDWIDTH, LLC ORDER Application to Transfer a Certificate of Authority to
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Tribal Mobility Fund Phase I Auction ) AU Docket No. 13-53 Scheduled for October 24, 2013 ) COMMENTS OF AT&T AT&T
More informationBefore the. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90 and 95 of the Commission s Rules to Improve Wireless Coverage Through the Use
More informationDecember 9, 2011 Advice Letter 2613-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor December 9, 2011 Advice Letter 2613-E Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations P O
More informationFebruary 18, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426
California Independent System Operator Corporation February 18, 2015 The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: California
More informationCALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL)
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL) (Date Filed / Received Stamp by CPUC Industry Division) Date AL served on parties: August 15, 2018 Company Name: AT&T California
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matters of Video Device Competition Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Commercial Availability
More informationSignature Page/AT&T-21STATE Page 1 of 2 Broadview Networks, Inc. Version: 2Q14-04/10/14 AMENDMENT BETWEEN BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC D/B/A AT&T ALABAMA, AT&T FLORIDA, AT&T GEORGIA, AT&T KENTUCKY,
More informationStaff Subcommittee on Telecommunications
Staff Subcommittee on Telecommunications Staff Subcommittee on Telecommunications Mobility Fund II What s Mobilizing? Connecting America; Mobility Fund II Catherine J.K. Sandoval Associate Professor Santa
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) The Use of N11 Codes and Other Abbreviated ) CC Docket No. 92-105 Dialing Arrangements ) COMMENTS TO REFRESH THE
More informationUpdates and Modifications to Report
QUARTERLY COMPLIANCE REPORT (JANUARY 2017) OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) REGARDING STATUS OF TRANSMISSION PROJECTS AND GENERATION INTERCONNECTION PROJECTS Pursuant to Commission Decision
More informationFile No. SR-NASD-00-70
November 29, 2000 Ms. Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549-1001 Re: File No. SR-NASD-00-70
More informationNERC Notice of Penalty regarding Upper Peninsula Power Company, FERC Docket No. NP09-_-000
May 7, 2009 Ms. Kimberly Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: NERC Notice of Penalty regarding, FERC Docket No. NP09-_-000 Dear Ms. Bose:
More informationCALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL)
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL) (Date Filed / Received Stamp by CPUC Industry Division) Date AL served on parties: July 11, 2018 Company Name: AT&T California
More informationCALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL)
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL) (Date Filed / Received Stamp by CPUC Industry Division) Date AL served on parties: September 26, 2018 Company Name: AT&T
More informationWORK SESSION: Telecommunications Wireless in the Public Rights of Way
WORK SESSION: Telecommunications Wireless in the Public Rights of Way International Municipal Lawyers Association 81st Annual Conference San Diego, California October 1, 2016 Gail A. Karish Partner Best
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop a Successor to Existing Net Energy Metering Tariffs Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 2827.1,
More information136 FERC 61,039 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No. RM ] Smart Grid Interoperability Standards
136 FERC 61,039 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. RM11-2-000] Smart Grid Interoperability Standards (Issued July 19, 2011) AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
More informationCALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL)
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Advice Letter Filing Summary Sheet (PAL) (Date Filed / Received Stamp by CPUC Industry Division) Date AL served on parties: July 11, 2018 Company Name: AT&T California
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) AT&T Petition to Launch a Proceeding ) GN Docket No. 12-353 Concerning the TDM-to-IP Transition ) ) Petition of
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENTS OF THE INDICATED TRANSMISSION OWNERS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION North American Electric Reliability Corporation Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. ) ) ) ) Docket No. RC09-3-000 MOTION
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (NOT CONSOLIDATED) And Related Matters. Application Application
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies, Procedures and Rules for Development of Distribution Resources Plans Pursuant to Public
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CRIMINAL DIVISION FELONY BRANCH
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CRIMINAL DIVISION FELONY BRANCH In the Matter of the Search of www.disruptj20.org ) Special Proceeding No. 17 CSW 3438 that Is Stored at Premises Owned, Maintained,
More informationRe: File No. SR-NASD Amendments to NASD Rules 1013 and 1140
August 28, 2003 Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549-1001 Re: File No. SR-NASD-2003-136
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation into the State of Competition Among Telecommunications Providers in California, and to Consider and Resolve
More informationAdvice Letters 4350-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor March 25, 2014 Advice Letters 4350-E Brian K. Cherry Vice President, Regulation
More informationFCC FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. In the Matter of ) Telephone Number Portability ) CC Docket No ) RM 8535
FCC 96-286 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of ) Telephone Number Portability ) CC Docket No. 95-116 ) RM 8535 FIRST REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: June
More informationFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING CODE COMMISSION
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN RE: PETITION FOR DECLARATORY STATEMENT BY VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LP
More informationAugust 19, Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C
7852 Walker Drive, Suite 200, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 phone: 301-459-7590, fax: 301-577-5575 internet: www.jsitel.com, e-mail: jsi@jsitel.com Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission
More informationSubject: Joint Filing PG&E, SDG&E, SoCalGas, & SCE - Low Income Customer Data Sharing With Water Utilities
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor February 27, 2014 Advice Letter 2962-E Megan Scott-Kakures Vice President, Regulatory Operations
More informationNEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rules
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rules What are we proposing? The Department of Buildings (DOB) is proposing to amend 1 RCNY 104-09
More informationCalifornia Code of Regulations TITLE 21. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION 1. DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES CHAPTER 1. OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT
California Code of Regulations TITLE 21. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION 1. DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES CHAPTER 1. OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT SUBCHAPTER 2.5. VOLUNTARY CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM Program
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Spectrum and Service Rules for Ancillary Terrestrial Components in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Big LEO Bands Review of the Spectrum
More informationCALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL
FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 727 METERING PROTOCOL FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 728 METERING PROTOCOL Table of Contents MP 1 OBJECTIVES, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE
More informationMark T. Bryant, Ph.D.
Profile Economic and policy analysis with particular emphasis on the telecommunications industry. Experience Self-Employed, Consulting Economist - 2002-present Provided economic analysis and expert testimony
More informationrvic November
rvic 201 Brooks Street, P.O. Box 812 Charleston, West Virginia 25323 Phone: (304) 340-0300 Fax: (304) 340-0325 November 19.201 8 Electronic Service Only J. Andrew Gipson, Esq. Counsel, Boomerang Wireless
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTING FERC ORDER 717C STANDARDS OF CONDUCT Version 1.2 Updated June 14, 2017 Purpose: To provide Southern California Edison s (SCE) overall
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIZON OPPOSITION TO PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION 1
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Connect America Fund Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund WC Docket No. 10-90 WT Docket No. 10-208 VERIZON OPPOSITION
More informationScreening Procedures for Access to ISO Register of Transmission Facilities and Entitlements
Screening Procedures for Access to ISO Register of Transmission Facilities and Entitlements In accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) order issued on January 24, 2003 (as modified
More informationThe Staff Report highlights just how critical a comprehensive review of the
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER AND AARP ON THE STAFF REPORT ON PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAMS I. Introduction On April 14, 2006,
More informationJanuary 30, Docket Nos. ER and ER Interconnection Queue Quarterly Progress Report, Q4 2014
California Independent System Operator Corporation The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 January 30, 2015 Re: California
More informationSAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY
CITY OF C 3 SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL AGENDA: 10/06/15 ITEM: A.io Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh SUBJECT: AMENDING THE MASTER DATE: October 2, 2015 AGREEMENT
More informationMarch 15, 2011 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
California Independent System Operator Corporation VIA ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20246 Re: California
More informationCALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 977 METERING PROTOCOL
ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 977 METERING PROTOCOL ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. III Original Sheet No. 978 METERING PROTOCOL Table of Contents MP 1 OBJECTIVES, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE MP 1.1 Objective
More informationApril 11, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
April 11, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No.
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Approval of its 2016 Rate Design Window Proposals. Application No. 16-09-003
More informationApril 10, 2014 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Zsuzsanna E. Benedek Associate General Counsel 240 North Third Street, Suite 300 Harrisburg, PA 17101 Telephone: 717.245.6346 Fax: 717.236.1389 sue.benedek@centurylink.com VIA ELECTRONIC FILING April 10,
More informationPOSTED September 3, 2009 QWEST CORPORATION S COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN FOR ENHANCED PROTOCOL PROCESSING SERVICES
POSTED September 3, 2009 QWEST CORPORATION S COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN FOR ENHANCED PROTOCOL PROCESSING SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. DESCRIPTION OF ENHANCED SERVICES
More information5 of overriding considerations, related to full implementation of Habitat Mitigation Actions
F'ILE NO. 100901 RESOLUTION NO. 370 - (0 1 [California Environmental Quality Act Findings for Water System Improvement Program Habitat Mitigation Actions 2 3 Resolution adopting findings under the California
More information