Phase II Upgrades. Eckhard Elsen. LHC RRB Meeting, Oct 29-31, Director Research and Computing

Transcription

1 Phase II Upgrades Eckhard Elsen Director Research and Computing updated after the meeting with CMS information of LHC RRB Meeting, Oct 29-31, 2018

2 ATLAS and CMS Phase II Upgrades Original plans had been outlined in LoI and Technical Proposal All* TDRs have been received; good understanding of the technical needs and scope * CMS TDAQ scheduled to come later to profit from technology development ISBN: CERN-LHCC CMS-TDR Apr 2018 CMS 08/04/2018 CERN-LHCC ISBN: Scoping Documents have been provided in addition end 2015 European Organization for Nuclear Research Organisation européenne pour la recherche nucléaire THE PHASE-2 UPGRADE OF THE ENDCAP CALORIMETER TECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT CERN CERN-LHCC / CMS-TDR-019 Two of the later TDRs The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Endcap Calorimeter Technical Design Report

3 Experiments Each major detector component provided its own TDR; 10 TDRs have been received in total TDRs were scheduled not to arrive at the same time TDRs have been examined by LHCC for physics need and technical soundness Cost matrix and risks monitored by UCG Try to optimise and profit from synergies in technical development April RRB closed the loop for the first time

4 Status April RRB LHCC assumptions on LHC luminosity are realistic; pile-up of 60 in 2017 is an indicator of what is to come at the HL-LHC Experiments have to safeguard themselves (Timing detectors) All TDRs have been scrutinised thanks to tremendous LHCC/UCG effort A smaller version of the upgrade would not exploit the investments in HL-LHC in full Cost has been optimised; additional R&D will continue Loop has been closed: Scoping Document 10+1 TDRs Cost Overview

5 Money Matrix Continuously updated and maintained by experiments during the process original cost frame maintained timing detectors have been examined for physics need in November 2017 LHCC and are included in the phase II upgrade encouraging involvement of funding agencies have reached good closure so far October 2018 RRB to settle the sharing

6 ATLAS ATLAS Phase-II Upgrades envisaged CORE Contributions by Funding Agency [kchf] ITk TDAQ Total LAr Tile Muons HGTD 3) Total Common Fund TOTAL 2) (incl. CF) CORE Costs 1) [kchf] 44' '226 28'385 11'573 28'401 8' '964 24' ' MCHF Funding Agency CORE Commitments Argentina Armenia Australia 390 2'021 2' '606 Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Brazil Canada 5'958 1'573 7' '379 Chile China NSFC+MSTC 2' ' '446 Colombia Czech Republic 500 4' ' '119 Denmark ' '565 France IN2P '075 5' '700 16'305 1'489 17'794 France CEA 1'139 2' ' '204 Georgia Germany BMBF 2'760 11'677 1' ' '582 1'998 20'580 Germany DESY 6'034 6' '518 Germany MPI '432 3' '073 Greece 800 2'505 3' '500 Hong Kong Israel 2' ' '265 Italy 3'850 5'585 1' '621 17'454 2'207 19'661 Japan 1'643 11'638 4'281 17' '555 Morocco Netherlands 400 2' ' '917 Norway 1'918 1' '127 Poland 2'000 1'720 3' '098 Portugal ' '589 Romania 1'735 1'174 2' '118 Russia 1'283 1' '813 4' '433 JINR 940 1' ' '400 Serbia Slovak Republic ' '431 Slovenia South Africa ' '218 Spain 3'502 1' ' '897 Sweden 200 2'162 1' ' '115 Switzerland 1'500 5'275 6' '101 Taipei ' '106 Turkey ' '400 United Kingdom 3'821 16'818 20'639 2'494 23'134 USA DOE 2'135 20' '983 3'656 26'639 USA NSF 5'940 8'441 1'882 2'899 19' '063 CERN 8'044 7'975 3' '094 2'006 25'495 1'332 26'827 TOTAL (kchf) 44' '384 28'389 11'557 28'401 7' '867 24' '287 Uncertainty Low 74.5% 85.6% 95.0% 82.3% 62.5% 87.8% 81.9% 100.0% 83.6% Medium 15.1% 14.1% 5.0% 16.8% 34.8% 15.3% 13.9% High 9.0% 0.4% 0.8% 2.7% 5.3% 2.4% 2.2% % of CORE Costs 98.5% 100.1% 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 93.1% 99.6% 100.0% 99.6% (Total - CORE Costs) '097-1'097 Notes 1) CORE costs as defined in the TDRs and reviewed in detail by the Upgrade Cost Group (UCG) for TDAQ, ITk, LAr, Tile, Muons. For HGTD, FWD, µ-tagger see notes 3-6). 2) Bar scale normalised to largest entry in column. 3) The High Granularity Timing Detector (HGTD) has not yet been reviewed, the TDR will follow in ) A new LUCID detector was originally proposed in the Scoping Document under "Forward Detectors". It is now planned as a "Small Project" with details to be worked out in the coming months. 5) The remaining Forward Detector projects (ALFA,AFP,ZDC) are not being formally proposed at this stage. 6) The µ-tagger project is not included in the present Phase-II scope, but remains an option as a further upgrade project for installation at a later stage (>2025)

7 CMS CMS Phase 2 Money Matrix (in kchf) - RRB, 29 October 2018 FA/Subsystem EC-CALO Barrel - CALO Muons Tracker MIP-TD BRIL TDAQ Common Fund Total Phase-2 CORE Costs (kchf) 67,127 13,255 25, ,900 15,796 2,600 18,500 25, ,365 Austria ,026 Belgium FNRS 100 4, ,389 Belgium FWO 5, ,417 Brazil/FAPESP 1, ,417 Brazil/RENAFAE Bulgaria CERN 21,500 2,000 1,524 19,500 1,200 4,500 1,322 51,546 China 900 1, ,004 Colombia Croatia 1, ,495 Cyprus Egypt Estonia Finland 151 1,100 1, ,487 France-CEA 1,000 1, ,308 France-IN2P3 6, , ,524 Germany BMBF 1,920 9,450 1,196 12,566 Germany Helmholtz 9, ,241 Greece 350 1,400 1, ,076 Hungary ,081 India 1, ,383 2, ,387 Iran 1, ,535 Ireland Italy 1,900 5,150 14,000 3, ,007 27,857 Korea 2, ,618 Lithuania Malaysia Mexico 1, ,199 New Zealand Pakistan 550 1, ,186 Poland Portugal ,949 RDMS-DMS-Russia 8, ,522 10,482 Serbia Spain 1,500 1, ,779 Switzerland 2,400 9,100 1, ,207 Taipei 2, ,872 Thailand Turkey 2, ,311 United Kingdom 3, , ,033 8,033 USA-DOE 14,500 2,698 13,690 5,000 3,886 5,431 45,205 USA-NSF 4,194 2,230 12, ,381 21,545 USA-DOE-NP 5, ,830 Ecuador Montenegro Sri Lanka Latvia Qatar Funding (kchf) 67,251 13,243 25, ,277 12,360 1,845 18,811 25, ,759 Uncertainty low 75% 98% 70% 94% 92% 81% 58% 100% 85% Uncertainty Medium 18% 1% 23% 5% 0% 19% 9% 0% 9% Uncertainty High 7% 1% 7% 1% 8% 0% 33% 0% 5% Funding/CORE Costs 100% 100% 103% 102% 78% 71% 102% 100% 100% Funding-CORE Costs , MCHF Colour coding Uncertainty low Uncertainty Medium Uncertainty High

8 Goal for October RRB (this meeting) MoUs for Common Fund has been put in place a year ago Most of the TDRs have been thoroughly scrutinised remaining TDR subjected to same procedure; cost estimate is available Timing detectors to come So agree on the overall cost envelope (>1/4 bnchf for each experiment) begin to conclude MoU with each funding agency

9 Common Fund for HL-LHC Status of Signatures Single MoU to describe Common Fund capped at ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB a fraction O(10%) ~ 25 MCHF spread evenly over construction period Sharing according to PhD or equivalent Separate budgeting from M&O but similar accounting methods Addendum No. 17 to the Memorandum of Understanding for Collaboration in the Construction of the ATLAS Detector Common Items for the Phase-II Upgrade of the ATLAS Detector same principle applied for both experiments ATLAS CMS Status of signatures: CMS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB Fraction of signatures Addendum No. 10 to the Memorandum of Understanding for Collaboration in the Construction of the CMS Detector signed signed Common Items for the Phase II Upgrade of the CMS Detector

10 Phase II Upgrade Group (P2UG) Progress Tracking of the Phase II upgrade ATLAS and CMS progress reviewed every 6 months, interleaved Milestone tracking Chairs Marcel Demarteau Mauro Morandin Each team is consists of ~10 experts including those familiar with the TDR approval process

11 Full mandate of P2UG The ATLAS and CMS P2UG chairs and regular members are nominated by the CERN DRC, also using the broad expertise available among the members of the Phase II TDRs review panels. The P2UGs report to the DRC and to the LHCC through their chairs. The LHCC and UCG chairs are ex-officio members of the two P2UGs, although they are not expected to participate in every meeting. The P2UGs will monitor the execution of the Phase II upgrade projects, verifying the technical progress, tracking the milestones, and ensuring the level of effort and managerial organisation are adequate. They will regularly report to the LHCC about their findings, promptly identifying areas that might require further in-depth investigation, in particular significant deviations from the TDR plans. The P2UGs is also expected to report on the final reviews convened by the experiments before major spending, proving advice to the LHCC and the CERN management on the approval for construction of the projects, described as Step 3 in CERN-LHCC It is expected that each P2UG will meet twice a year with the respective experiment, scheduling the meeting to maximize synergies with the experiment internal review process. CERN will provide centralised support for collecting and maintaining milestones and schedule information uniformly for the two experiments, as well as secretarial support to run the meetings The initial mandate for the P2UGs members will be two years, although the P2UGs should remain in place until the installation of the upgrades, currently foreseen during LS3 (Q1/2024-Q2/2026).

12 Upgrade Cost Group (UCG) Phase II Upgrade Group (P2UP) Upgrade Cost Group continues to review remaining (and forthcoming) TDRs Phase II Upgrade Group Reviews the execution of the approved TDRs

13 Conclusion TDRs in place Tremendous effort has been made by LHCC and UCG LHCC / UCG work is very well supported (including cross-refereeing) Upgrade Progress will be monitored by two standing sub-committees of the LHCC, the P2UG Cost containment fulfilled; need of Timing detector Proceed to MoUs