Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1: Definition of the PFS services (requirements, initial design)
|
|
- Griffin Goodwin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1: Definition of the PFS services (requirements, initial design) Project acronym: EHR4CR Project full title: Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research Grant agreement no.: Budget: 16 million EURO Start: End: Website: The EHR4CR project is partially funded by the IMI JU programme Coordinator: Managing Entity:
2 Document description Deliverable no: D6.1 (executive summary) Deliverable title: Initial EHR4CR architecture and interoperability framework specifications Description: First deliverable of Work Package 6 Status: Final Version: 0.2 Date: 30/07/2012 Deadline: Editors: Isabelle Stévant Document history Date Revision Author(s) Changes 29/06/ Isabelle Stévant Initial draft 30/07/ Isabelle Stévant Final version Table of Content 1. Recap of PFS scenario Recap of WP6 objectives for PFS scenario Interdependencies Service definition State of the art Project similar to the PFS scenario DEBUGIT I2B2/SHRINE FARSITE EPCRN STRIDE Formal representation of eligibility criteria PFS end user services : constraints to be considered Functional architecture of PFS end user services Graphical user interface of PFS end user services Authentication User home page Feasibility studies list page Feasibility study workbench Query management Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 2 of 12
3 8.4. Query builder Conclusion Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 3 of 12
4 1. Recap of PFS scenario One of the first steps in the design of any clinical study is determining the feasibility of the protocol to be executed. There are two main components to this feasibility a) optimize the inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure that the underlying patient population from which the study will recruit is sufficiently large, and b) technical feasibility, ensure that each site can enroll patients and support a clinical study. There are often many iterations surrounding the choice of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and changes here not only affect the base population, but can also affect the scientific design of the study. Therefore, the overall goal of this task is to demonstrate that the EHR4CR platform can provide reliable answers to the following questions: Do the inclusion/exclusion criteria suggest that a site is a practical location to run a clinical study? What happens when inclusion/exclusion criteria are changed? Which are the most appropriate sites for pursuing a study within a disease area? 2. Recap of WP6 objectives for PFS scenario The objective of this WP is to design and implement end-to-end solutions (tools and services) that address the requirements of the different EHR4CR scenarios (clinical trial protocol feasibility, patient recruitment, clinical trial execution and drug safety monitoring). This Work Package is built on the semantic interoperability services (WP 4) and the data protection services (WP 5) and will comply with the EHR4CR architecture (WP 3). WP 6 specifies the technical process flows based on the detailed WP 1 scenarios and implement them based on generic components delivered by the other technical WPs on the EHR4CR architecture. The initial description of works for the PFS scenario contain the following tasks : Clinical Trial Protocol Feasibility Services (PFS) Eligibility Criteria Authoring and Management Services (CAMS) Data Presentation and Visualization 3. Interdependencies In this section we will describe what exactly we want to achieve in this document and how it relates to the other Work Packages. We can use the Figure 1 to clarify this and build some consistency with the Architecture Document (WP3 Deliverable D3.1). The Architecture Document is built around requirements, constraints and specifications provided by several Work Packages. WP1 provides the stakeholder analysis and functional requirements for the architecture WP2 describes the business environment in which the architecture has to be positioned. Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 4 of 12
5 WP4 provides the information view for the Architecture WP5 provides the information security and privacy requirements and constraints for the architecture WP7 identifies the set of clinical data elements (coming from the EHRs), the data elements to represent eligibility criteria. WP7 identifies the current status of local infrastructure WP6 will define the Service Specification based on the system architecture provided by WP3. 4. Service definition Figure 1 Work Package Relationships and Deliverables The approach for defining the EHR4CR PFS Service is as follows: 1. Define the service expectations from an End User perspective. These expectations should be derived from the EHR4CR User Requirements (WP1). Important though it is that we consider the trade-offs between quality and cost we need to be able to articulate how the service will be affected by changing any of the capability tolerance (e.g. instead of having a system available 24x7, what would be the impact of having it down during the weekend). 2. The Service Expectations have to be translated into Service Capabilities. Although the main interface between the End User and the system will be the GUI we need to look at more than purely the usability of the GUI. We will look at re-usability, reliability, performance and cost as well. 3. Next, the Service Capabilities will have to be translated into a service offering. This will be done through a Service Catalogue. The Service Catalogue will present the PFS service to the End User as a set of Billable Units. These billable units will have to be defined after the technical platform architecture has fully been developed. Only then we will be able to differentiate between one-time service units, recurring service units, and mandatory and optional service units. Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 5 of 12
6 4. Finally, for all service components we can define Service Levels. It will be important to define how we will deal with Service Level Agreements. 5. State of the art 5.1. Project similar to the PFS scenario DEBUGIT The DebugIT (Detecting and Eliminating Bacteria Using Information Technology) project aims at providing a fully semantic compliant IT infrastructure to share antimicrobial resistance information from healthcare institutions spread across Europe. The ultimate goal of the project is to help in the fight against increasing antimicrobial resistance with innovative solutions derived from advanced information mining methods. The main end users of the DebugIT system are public health agents, infectiologists and physicians I2B2/SHRINE The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE) helps researchers overcome one of the greatest problems in population-based research: Compiling large groups of well-characterized patients. Qualified investigators may use the SHRINE web-based query tool to determine the aggregate total number of patients at participating hospitals who meet a given set of inclusion and exclusion criteria (currently demographics, diagnoses, medications, and selected laboratory values). These functionalities relate primarily to EHR4CR scenario 1 (protocol feasibility), which requires only access to aggregated, de-identified data FARSITE FARSITE offers support for Protocol Feasibility and Patient Recruitment. It provides an interface for easily building up protocols to identify cohorts of patients within an anonymised dataset and integrates with a service for identification of patients for clinicians. It is able to query against primary and secondary care data sources. It does not currently include an API for federated querying of the type required for EHR4CR, however the Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 6 of 12
7 current restful design could be adapted easily to accommodate a wider service-oriented architecture. FARSITE is also not currently able to query against non-coded or free text information EPCRN epcrn is currently a solution for protocol feasibility AND recruitment. At present the trial data management functionality is incomplete (it will be taken forward via TRANSFoRm). The software also offers an example of how to incorporate a semantic and model-based bridge between heterogeneous data sources as both the terminology service and the data model requirements are modular and dynamically driven. The query builder is based on a criteria pattern approach. The user can instantiate a criteria and put constraints on values. The system automatically generates a human readable statement STRIDE STRIDE (Stanford Translational Research Integrated Database Environment) is a research and development project at Stanford University to create a standards-based informatics platform supporting clinical and translational research. Stanford researchers can search the CDW to identify potential research patient cohorts using a self-service visual query tool called the Anonymous Patient Cohort Discovery Tool. This Java application uses an intuitive drag and drop interface to create and execute queries in real time, answering the question does the STRIDE CDW contain a cohort of patients with these attributes? No individual patient data is exposed by this tool and binning is used to prevent identification of individual patients within small cohort sets. All research patient cohort searches are logged for audit purposes. Patient cohorts of interest can be saved within the central STRIDE system for later use in IRB- approved chart review or research data set extraction Formal representation of eligibility criteria Eligibility criteria are usually written in free text to be human-readable; therefore, they are not amenable for computational processing. One important contribution of the EHR4CR project, is to be able to query clinical data according a set of eligibility criteria originally described in free text. In the current process of clinical research, the interpretation of the free text representation is made by the PFS experts, or by the investigators who check with the patient data, if a population or individuals match or not match each criterion. Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 7 of 12
8 As the scope of the project is to reuse the data contained in the EHRs, a computable knowledge representation for eligibility criteria is needed to convey unambiguous logical statements to provide decision. Many formalisms exist. They are listed in the WP4 deliverable (D4.1), and among them, ERGO seems to be one of the best candidates. At the time of writing this deliverable, the WPG2-team had not made a final choice for EHR4CR. 6. PFS end user services : constraints to be considered The PFS end user services (PFSeus) have to take into account different types of constraints that are explored by the different work packages of the project. Prior to a final decision being made on the exact nature of these constraints the WP6 team has made some assumptions regarding the functionalities of the PFSeus. However, the core functionalities of PFSeus (the query workbench) is well identified and defined. Below, we summarize the different constraints and issues that PFSeus has to deal with. In the project, the global method of the software development is to deliver iterative versions of the services. We expect that these constraints (especially the business model) will be gradually refined during the project time. Requirements (WP1) Ethical aspects and business model constraints (WP2) Architecture (WP3) Security (WP5) Semantic interoperability (WP4) Pilot sites (WP7) 7. Functional architecture of PFS end user services The protocol feasibility tools are described as a workbench for studying distributed patient data, as a cohort selection tool. The Protocol feasibility scenario is divided in different phases (functional areas are shown in italic): 1. Protocol Feasibility Study Management: Creation of the protocol feasibility study 2. Query Management: Creation of study query 3. Query Builder: Definition of the query statement 4. Query Management: Launching the query 5. Query Visualization and Analysis: Display of results 6. Query Builder: Modifying the query and measuring impact on results 7. Protocol Feasibility Study Management: Save query and associated result sets to feasibility Study Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 8 of 12
9 8. Graphical user interface of PFS end user services The general structure of the EHR4CR services is mainly inspired from the structure of a project management and collaboration tool. A user whom belongs to a registered organization has his own account from where he can see all the PFS from his organization. According to his rights, he can manage FPS, queries, users, access rights as it was previously described Authentication To sign in, the user enters his unique user ID ( address or specific ID provided by the system during registration) and his password provided by the Organization manager. A link Forget your password? allows a user to recover an access in case of the loss of the password. The user is prompted to enter his ID and he submits the request. He will receive an with his password User home page On this page, the user can see news from his organization or from the EHR4CR platform such as new Clinical data warehouses or new service updates. The frames are presented here as examples of what we can have on the home page. On the right, the user can have a quick access to recent active feasibility studies. If he wants to see all the available PFS, he has to click on Feasibility Studies on the top menu Feasibility studies list page By clicking on the Feasibility Studies menu, the user access to the list of PFS from his organization. On this page, the users can browse and see the details of existing feasibility studies. They need authorization to have an access to the feasibility study itself. A user can also create a new feasibility study and allow other users to see and access to it Feasibility study workbench After choosing the PFS, the user enters in the PFS workbench. A second access menu appears to allow the user to navigate into the different PFS services. This menu gives an access to the Overview page, the documentation manager, the query manager, the query Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 9 of 12
10 builder, and for users who have edit rights, the study manager Query management The query management page is quite similar to the PFS management pages previously described. It lists the existing queries from the current PFS. The user can access to the query builder to edit the query by clicking on the title. The query in blue are these the user is allowed to access, the ones in black are these he does not have access rights. When a user clicks on the check box of a blue query, the Edit, Duplicate and Delete button become accessible. The user can select several queries to delete, or to clone (duplicate). When one query is selected the Edit button is active, whereas when several queries are selected, the edit button is deactivated Query builder Once the user has created the new query, he accesses to the query builder itself. The query builder is a graphical query editor that will guide the user to compose queries in an easy and ergonomic way. The query builder is divided in three parts: the terminology where the user will pick terms to compose his query, the query composer itself with the logical and temporal operators needed to compose complex queries and a contextual part where will be display the different options related to a specific term such as lab results or dosages. The composer supports the Boolean operators AND, OR, NOT and provides brackets to help the user composing complex criteria such as: { Term1 AND Term2 } OR Term3 The composer also supports Temporal Operators. The user click on the purple button Time Operator and then he has the possibility to choose which Allen s operator he wants to use and he defines the values using the Advanced Option frame under the Composer. The user can apply a temporal operator to one term or to several one using the brackets: { Term1 AND Term2 } After 01/01/2011 Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 10 of 12
11 The last operator is the Occurrence or Frequency operator. The user can apply to one or more terms this operator to express the number of occurrence of an event. This operator can be coupled with a temporal operator: After 01/01/2011 { Term1 > 2 } The operators are designed with contrasted colours to allow the user to easily recognize them. This will help to avoid confusion when looking at a complex query. Once the user has composed the query, he has the ability to save it and to run it. By running the query, the query builder will generate the query in a specific formalism accepted by the orchestrator. The query will be split into as many sub-queries as there are criteria in the initial query. Therefore, the result of the query will not only be the total number of patient whom fit the criteria but as well the number of patient whom fit the query for each criterion. This will allow the user to appreciate the impact of the criteria on the result and identify if a criteria is to constraining. The user will also be able to modify an existing query. Each version of a query will be saved and will be accessible to let the user the ability to retrieve any previous version of the query. The results will also be saved and linked to its query version. 9. Conclusion WP 6 aims to provide end user services that fit all the constraints defined by the other work packages such as the semantic interoperability (WP 4), pilot sites (WP7) or security (WP 5). Those services must provide a useful and efficient tool for the first step of a clinical research, the feasibility study. At month M12, some of the constraints are still not finalised, this led to the WP 6 team making some Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 11 of 12
12 assumptions about the functionalities. However, the core functionalities of the PFS (the query workbench) are well identified and defined. We focused on this part to propose an original graphical interface which can answer the needs. After validation of the mockups, the development will be split into different team depending of the resources. Executive Summary for deliverable D6.1 Page 12 of 12
OnCore Enterprise Research. Subject Administration Full Study
OnCore Enterprise Research Subject Administration Full Study Principal Investigator Clinical Research Coordinator June 2017 P a g e 1 This page is intentionally blank. P a g e 2 Table of Contents What
More informationi2b2 User Guide University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Clinical and Translational Science Institute i2b2 User Guide i2b2 is a tool for discovering research cohorts using existing, de-identified, clinical data This guide is provided by the Office of Biomedical
More informationICTR UW Institute of Clinical and Translational Research. i2b2 User Guide. Version 1.0 Updated 9/11/2017
ICTR UW Institute of Clinical and Translational Research i2b2 User Guide Version 1.0 Updated 9/11/2017 Table of Contents Background/Search Criteria... 2 Accessing i2b2... 3 Navigating the Workbench...
More informationThe NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network: A Privacy Protecting Method for Sharing Research Data Sets
The NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network: A Privacy Protecting Method for Sharing Research Data Sets Jeffrey Brown, Lesley Curtis, and Rich Platt June 13, 2014 Previously The NIH Collaboratory:
More informationSupporting Patient Screening to Identify Suitable Clinical Trials
Supporting Patient Screening to Identify Suitable Clinical Trials Anca BUCUR a,1, Jasper VAN LEEUWEN a, Njin-Zu CHEN a, Brecht CLAERHOUT b Kristof DE SCHEPPER b, David PEREZ-REY c, Raul ALONSO-CALVO c,
More informationProposed Revisions to ebxml Technical Architecture Specification v ebxml Business Process Project Team
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Proposed Revisions to ebxml Technical Architecture Specification v1.0.4 ebxml Business Process Project Team 11
More informationELECTRONIC SITE DELEGATION LOG (esdl) USER MANUAL
Version 1.0 24May16 ELECTRONIC SITE DELEGATION LOG (esdl) USER MANUAL - Table of Contents - 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 Background... 3 Purpose of the Site Delegation Log... 3 TNCC Contacts... 3 2. SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS...
More informationProposed Revisions to ebxml Technical. Architecture Specification v1.04
Proposed Revisions to ebxml Technical Architecture Specification v1.04 Business Process Team 11 May 2001 (This document is the non-normative version formatted for printing, July 2001) Copyright UN/CEFACT
More informationSubject Area Data Element Examples Earliest Date Patient Demographics Race, primary language, mortality 2000 Encounters
User Guide DataDirect is a self-service tool enabling access to robust, up-to-date data on more than 3 million unique patients from across the UMHS enterprise. This data informs study design and guides
More informationTable of Contents. Page 1 of 51
Table of Contents Introduction/Background/Search Criteria...2 Accessing i2b2.3 Navigating the Workbench..14 Resize the Workspace 17 Constructing and Running a Query.18 Selecting Query Criteria. 18 Building
More informationA Vision for Bigger Biomedical Data: Integration of REDCap with Other Data Sources
A Vision for Bigger Biomedical Data: Integration of REDCap with Other Data Sources Ram Gouripeddi Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah Senior Biomedical Informatics
More informationSNOMED Clinical Terms
Representing clinical information using SNOMED Clinical Terms with different structural information models KR-MED 2008 - Phoenix David Markwell Laura Sato The Clinical Information Consultancy Ltd NHS Connecting
More informationUse Cases for Argonaut Project -- DRAFT Page
Use Cases for Argonaut Project -- DRAFT Page 1 Use Cases for Argonaut Project DRAFT V0.3 March 03, 2015 Use Cases for Argonaut Project -- DRAFT Page 2 Introduction The Argonaut Project seeks to rapidly
More informationOverview of the Multi-Payer Claims Database (MPCD)
Overview of the Multi-Payer Claims Database (MPCD) Genesis of the MPCD The MPCD project is one of a number of initiatives related to comparative effectiveness research (CER) funded by the American Recovery
More informationDeliverable 4.4: Final specification of EHR4CR semantic interoperability solutions
Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research Deliverable 4.4: Final specification of EHR4CR semantic interoperability solutions Version 1.0 Final 29/02/2016 Project acronym: EHR4CR Project full title:
More informationSOLUTION ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNICAL OVERVIEW. Decentralized platform for coordination and administration of healthcare and benefits
SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNICAL OVERVIEW Decentralized platform for coordination and administration of healthcare and benefits ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES Blockchain Distributed ledgers Smart Contracts Relationship
More informationConCert FAQ s Last revised December 2017
ConCert FAQ s Last revised December 2017 What is ConCert by HIMSS? ConCert by HIMSS is a comprehensive interoperability testing and certification program governed by HIMSS and built on the work of the
More informationQualifying Alternative Payment Model Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet
Qualifying Alternative Payment Model Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet Overview This methodology fact sheet describes the process and methodology that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
More informationDeliverable D3.5 Harmonised e-authentication architecture in collaboration with STORK platform (M40) ATTPS. Achieving The Trust Paradigm Shift
Deliverable D3.5 Harmonised e-authentication architecture in collaboration with STORK platform (M40) Version 1.0 Author: Bharadwaj Pulugundla (Verizon) 25.10.2015 Table of content 1. Introduction... 3
More informationAcurian on. The Role of Technology in Patient Recruitment
Acurian on The Role of Technology in Patient Recruitment Wearables smartphones social networks the list of new technological tools available to patients and healthcare providers goes on and on. Many clinical
More informationReviewers Guide on Clinical Trials
Reviewers Guide on Clinical Trials Office of Research Integrity & Compliance Version 2 Updated: June 26, 2017 This document is meant to help board members conduct reviews for Full Board: Clinical Trial
More informationIn order to mine data. P. Pearl O Rourke, MD Partners HealthCare Boston, MA
In order to mine data P. Pearl O Rourke, MD Partners HealthCare Boston, MA In order to mine data You need a Mine P. Pearl O Rourke, MD Partners HealthCare Boston, MA Assumptions Current science requires
More informationQuickStart Manual Basic navigation techniques to get to your data fast. scan.com/tascangui
QuickStart Manual Basic navigation techniques to get to your data fast http://www.ta- scan.com/tascangui 1 The Homepage... 3 2 Top Menu... 4 3 Graphic User Interphase (GUI) philosophy... 4 4 Portfolio
More informationJanuary 16, Re: Request for Comment: Data Access and Data Sharing Policy. Dear Dr. Selby:
Dr. Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH Executive Director Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute 1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 Submitted electronically at: http://www.pcori.org/webform/data-access-and-data-sharing-policypublic-comment
More informationIntegration of INSPIRE & SDMX data infrastructures for the 2021 population and housing census
Integration of INSPIRE & SDMX data infrastructures for the 2021 population and housing census Nadezhda VLAHOVA, Fabian BACH, Ekkehard PETRI *, Vlado CETL, Hannes REUTER European Commission (*ekkehard.petri@ec.europa.eu
More informationF4E Industry & Associations Portal User Guide
F4E Industry & Associations Portal User Guide F4E Industry Portal Phase 2 THE EUROPEAN JOINT UNDERTAKING FOR ITER AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUSION ENERGY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 4 2 THE F4E INDUSTRY
More informationALBERTA ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION(AEFI) HL7 MESSAGING SPECIFICATION
Health Information Messaging Specification HEALTH INFORMATION STANDARDS COMMITTEE FOR ALBERTA ALBERTA ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION(AEFI) HL7 MESSAGING SPECIFICATION MESSAGE STANDARD SUMMARY Status:
More informationI2b2 - SHRINE support for Clinical Trails and the Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART) project
I2b2 - SHRINE support for Clinical Trails and the Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART) project Shawn Murphy MD, Ph.D. Nich Wattanasin MS Alyssa Porter Stella Ubaha Kenneth
More informationArticle. Reference. Clinical Data Models at University Hospitals of Geneva. VISHNYAKOVA, Dina, et al.
Article Clinical Data Models at University Hospitals of Geneva VISHNYAKOVA, Dina, et al. Abstract In order to reuse data for clinical research it is then necessary to overcome two main challenges - to
More informationStandards: Implementation, Certification and Testing Work group Friday, May 8, :00 Pm-1:30 Pm ET.
Standards: Implementation, Certification and Testing Work group Friday, May 8, 2015. 12:00 Pm-1:30 Pm ET. Agenda Complete Work group Comments- Group 1 Review Group 2 Comments. 2015 Edition Certification
More informationMEDICITY NETWORK ONC CERTIFICATION COST AND LIMITATIONS
MEDICITY NETWORK ONC CERTIFICATION COST AND LIMITATIONS Medicity is proud to offer health IT solutions that are certified under the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
More informationHITSP Standards Harmonization Process -- A report on progress
Document Number: HITSP 06 N 75 Date: May 4, 2006 HITSP Standards Harmonization Process -- A report on progress Arlington, VA May 4 th, 2006 0 What Was Done Reviewed obligations from federal contract Observed
More informationCertification for Meaningful Use Experiences and Observations from the Field June 2011
Certification for Meaningful Use Experiences and Observations from the Field June 2011 Principles for Certification to Support Meaningful Use Certification should promote EHR adoption by giving providers
More informationCHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HHS IT Direction & Priorities iti April 7, 2011 John Teeter Deputy Chief Information
More informationFunctional Requirements For the California Joint Replacement Registry I.T. Infrastructure
Functional Requirements For the California Joint Replacement Registry I.T. Infrastructure Prepared by Sujansky & Associates, LLC On behalf of the Pacific Business Group on Health August 13, 2010 Outline
More informationNewborn Screening Technical assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs)
Newborn Screening Technical assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs) USER GUIDE August 9 2016 The development of the NewSTEPs Data Repository was supported by Cooperative Agreement # U22MC24078 from
More informationInteroperability driven integration of biomedical data sources
Interoperability driven integration of biomedical data sources Douglas TEODORO a,1, Rémy CHOQUET c, Daniel SCHOBER d, Giovanni MELS e, Emilie PASCHE a, Patrick RUCH b, and Christian LOVIS a a SIMED, University
More informationEXAMPLE 3-JOINT PRIVACY AND SECURITY CHECKLIST
Purpose: The purpose of this Checklist is to evaluate your proposal to use or disclose Protected Health Information ( PHI ) for the purpose indicated below and allow the University Privacy Office and Office
More informationOnCore Enterprise Research. Exercises: Subject Administration
OnCore Enterprise Research Exercises: Subject Administration Clinical Research Coordinator June 2017 P a g e 1 This page is intentionally blank. P a g e 2 Exercises: Subject Administration Contents OnCore
More informationThe system will prompt for Login ID and Password (NB login credentials will be supplied to all staff after Commissioning).
training handout This training handout is intended to support the learning outcomes for pre-install training for clinical staff. Getting Started / Basic Navigation Medical Record Accessing appointment
More informationCertification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology. CCHIT A Catalyst for EHR Adoption
Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology CCHIT A Catalyst for EHR Adoption Alisa Ray, Executive Director, CCHIT Sarah Corley, MD, Chief Medical Officer, NextGen Healthcare Systems;
More informationNational Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy-2012 (NDSAP-2012)
National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy-2012 (NDSAP-2012) Department of Science & Technology Ministry of science & Technology Government of India Government of India Ministry of Science & Technology
More informationReproducible Workflows Biomedical Research. P Berlin, Germany
Reproducible Workflows Biomedical Research P11 2018 Berlin, Germany Contributors Leslie McIntosh Research Data Alliance, U.S., Executive Director Oya Beyan Aachen University, Germany Anthony Juehne RDA,
More informationOnCore Enterprise Research. Exercises: Subject Administration
OnCore Enterprise Research Exercises: Subject Administration Clinical Research Coordinator August 2018 P a g e 1 This page is intentionally blank. P a g e 2 Exercises: Subject Administration Contents OnCore
More informationUser Manual/Guide for Direct Using encompass 3.0. Prepared By: Arête Healthcare Services, LLC
User Manual/Guide for Direct Using encompass 3.0 Prepared By: Arête Healthcare Services, LLC Document Version: V1.0 10/02/2015 Contents Direct Overview... 3 What is Direct?... 3 Who uses Direct?... 3 Why
More informationUser Guide for DCP Consortia 2012
AQuIP On line Accrual Reporting System (OARS) User Guide for DCP Consortia 2012 This User Guide provides an introduction to the AQuIP On line Accrual Reporting System (OARS) for the Division of Cancer
More informationOffice of Human Research
Office of Human Research JeffTrial End-User Training Document Regulatory Coordinator Training for Non-Oncology personnel Office of Human Research 8/16/2013 Ver. 1.0 Contents The REG Role: Completing Basic
More informationMOIS Release Notes Version
MOIS Release Notes Version 2.20.18 Description Drug Interaction Results Display Window A new feature has been added to allow interaction checking in LTM, where each of the LTMs is checked against the others
More informationInvestigator Activities Quick Reference Guide. Sanofi/Genzyme October 2013
Investigator Activities Quick Reference Guide Sanofi/Genzyme October 2013 Contents INVESTIGATOR ACTIVITIES QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE... 1 I. INTRODUCTION... 3 II. HOW TO REGISTER AND LOG IN... 6 III. HOW TO
More informationehealth and DSM, Digital Single Market
ehealth and DSM, Digital Single Market Dr. Christoph Klein Interoperable data, access and sharing ehealth, Wellbeing and Ageing DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology European Commission, Luxembourg,
More informationPROJECT FINAL REPORT. Tel: Fax:
PROJECT FINAL REPORT Grant Agreement number: 262023 Project acronym: EURO-BIOIMAGING Project title: Euro- BioImaging - Research infrastructure for imaging technologies in biological and biomedical sciences
More informationClinicalTrials.gov PRS How to Register and Maintain a Record
ClinicalTrials.gov PRS How to Register and Maintain a Record IRB Compliance Program PRS Administrator, Brian Brotzman Human Subjects Office/Institutional Review Board Overview Purpose Rules and Regulations
More informationNexus EHR Patient Portal
Nexus EHR Patient Portal How to Register on Nexus Patient Portal When doctor s office invites you to portal, you will receive an invitation email with temporary password. Please go through the steps below
More informationIntroduction to the Participant Portal services
Research and Innovation Participant Portal Introduction to the Participant Portal services Agnes Hegyvarine Nagy agnes.nagy-hegyvarine@ec.europa.eu ERCEA David Baird DIGIT 1 What's new in Horizon 2020?
More informationMatt Quinn.
Matt Quinn matt.quinn@nist.gov Roles of AHRQ and NIST What s at Stake Current State of Usability in Certified EHRs Projects to Support Improved Usability Moving Forward June 7 NIST Workshop Questions NIST's
More informationOPEN v8.1 Site User Guide Revision 14
CTSU Cancer Trials Support Unit Revision 14 December 7, 2017 Overview of OPEN Document Information Revision Information for the Revision History # Date By Description 1.0 19-SEP-2013 Mark Stauffer Updated
More informationHorizon2020/EURO Coordination and Support Actions. SOcietal Needs analysis and Emerging Technologies in the public Sector
Horizon2020/EURO-6-2015 Coordination and Support Actions SOcietal Needs analysis and Emerging Technologies in the public Sector Deliverable D1.2 The SONNETS Research Data Management Plan Workpackage Editor(s):
More informationWorkshop 2. > Interoperability <
Workshop 2 21 / 08 / 2011 > Interoperability < Heiko Zimmermann R&D Engineer, AHI CR Santec Heiko.Zimmermann@tudor.lu Interoperability definition Picture from NCI-Wiki (https://wiki.nci.nih.gov) 2 Interoperability
More informationDATA PRESERVATION AND SHARING INITIATIVE. 1. Aims of the EORTC QLG Data Repository project
DATA PRESERVATION AND SHARING INITIATIVE 1. Aims of the EORTC QLG Data Repository project The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group Data Repository project
More informationCTSA Program Common Metric for Informatics Solutions
CTSA Program Common Metric for Informatics Solutions KRISTI HOLMES, PHD DIRECTOR OF EVALUATION, NUCATS DIRECTOR, GALTER HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY & LEARNING CENTER NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY CTSA PROGRAM STEERING
More informationMonarch General Capabilities Overview EMPOWERING ENABLING CONNECTING
Monarch General Capabilities Overview EMPOWERING ENABLING CONNECTING Executive Summary Monarch is a data translation, interface engine and routing solution for enterprise and system owners. Whether your
More informationTesting for Reliable and Dependable Health Information Exchange
Testing for Reliable and Dependable Health Information Exchange Presented by Didi Davis, Testing Programs Director 1 Copyright 2016 The Sequoia Project. All rights reserved. Discussion Topics 1. ehealth
More informationAgency User Manual. Version 2.0
Agency User Manual Version 2.0 October 2015 Copyright Information 2015 by. All rights reserved. This document is the copyrighted property of the. It should not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole
More informationD2.5 Data mediation. Project: ROADIDEA
D2.5 Data mediation Project: ROADIDEA 215455 Document Number and Title: D2.5 Data mediation How to convert data with different formats Work-Package: WP2 Deliverable Type: Report Contractual Date of Delivery:
More informationGuide to SciVal Experts
Guide to SciVal Experts Contents What is SciVal Experts and How Can I Benefit From It?....... 3 How is My Profile Created?... 4 The SciVal Experts Interface.... 5-6 Organization Home Page Unit Individual
More informationOpenBudgets.eu: Fighting Corruption with Fiscal Transparency. Project Number: Start Date of Project: Duration: 30 months
OpenBudgets.eu: Fighting Corruption with Fiscal Transparency Project Number: 645833 Start Date of Project: 01.05.2015 Duration: 30 months Deliverable 4.1 Specification of services' Interfaces Dissemination
More informationA Pilot Implementation of DIRECT Messaging and Provider Directory Services in the Palomar Health District
A Pilot Implementation of DIRECT Messaging and Provider Directory Services in the Palomar Health District Project Overview and Plan Sujansky & Associates, LLC 1. Project Objectives Figure 1. High-level
More informationHealthInfoNet CLINICAL PORTAL USER REFERENCE GUIDE. Revised: Page 1 of 24
HealthInfoNet CLINICAL PORTAL USER REFERENCE GUIDE Revised: 6.3.2015 Page 1 of 24 HealthInfoNet User Reference Guide INSIDE: Accessing HealthInfoNet (HIN) 3-5 Clinical Portal 6-11 Notifications and Worklists
More informationPCORI Online: Awardee User Guide Research Awards
PCORI Online: Awardee User Guide Research Awards Updated as of 1/31/18 1 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction to PCORI Online... 3 1.1 Getting Started - Tips for Using PCORI Online... 4 1.2 Logging
More informationThe Lilly Safety Mailing Process
The Lilly Safety Mailing Process 1 After this presentation you will be able to: Define Safety Mailings and the type of adverse events that trigger safety mailings. Define Principal Investigator (PI) and
More information!"# $ # # $ $ % $ &% $ '"# $ ()&*&)+(( )+(( )
!"# # # % &% '"# ) !#, ' "# " "# -. / # 0 0 0 0 0 "0 "# " # 1 #! " " 0 0 0 0 0 0 2# 0 # # 3 ' 4 56 7-56 87 9# 5 6 7 6 & 0 " : 9 ; 4 " #! 0 - '% # % "# " "# " < 4 "! % " % 4 % % 9# 4 56 87 = 4 > 0 " %!#
More informationTemporal Qualification in Topic Maps
Temporal Qualification in Topic Maps Lutz Maicher and Christoph Teichmann Topic Maps Lab Leipzig Abstract. This paper will introduce a number of predefined elements for the topic mas data model. The paper
More informationMinsoo Ryu. College of Information and Communications Hanyang University.
Software Reuse and Component-Based Software Engineering Minsoo Ryu College of Information and Communications Hanyang University msryu@hanyang.ac.kr Software Reuse Contents Components CBSE (Component-Based
More informationWhole Platform Foundation. The Long Way Toward Language Oriented Programming
Whole Platform Foundation The Long Way Toward Language Oriented Programming 2008 by Riccardo Solmi made available under the Creative Commons License last updated 22 October 2008 Outline Aim: Engineering
More informationStandards Development
Thailand s ehealth & Health Information Standards Development Collaborating across countries to harmonize information system standards understanding country opportunities and developing strategies to deal
More informationD3.1 Initial Overview of potential data sources with RWE data in Europe
D3.1 Initial Overview of potential data sources with RWE data in Europe 116020 - ROADMAP Real world Outcomes across the AD spectrum for better care: Multimodal data Access Platform WP3 WP Identification,
More informationCDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library. Guang-liang Wang September 18, Q3 DCDISC Meeting
CDASH Standards and EDC CRF Library Guang-liang Wang September 18, 2014 2014 Q3 DCDISC Meeting 1 Disclaimer The content of this presentation does not represent the views of my employer or any of its affiliates.
More informationM403 ehealth Interoperability Overview
CEN/CENELEC/ETSI M403 ehealth Interoperability Overview 27 May 2009, Bratislava Presented by Charles Parisot www.ehealth-interop.eu Mandate M/403 M/403 aims to provide a consistent set of standards to
More informationUniversity Health Network (UHN)
University Health Network (UHN) RESOURCE MATCHING AND REFERRAL (RM&R) AND ONLINE REFERRAL BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE TOOL (ORBIT) Policy Governing User Account Management Version: 4.0 Date: Last modified on
More informationA MODEL-INTEGRATED AUTHORING ENVIRONMENT FOR PRIVACY POLICIES
1 A MODEL-INTEGRATED AUTHORING ENVIRONMENT FOR PRIVACY POLICIES Tihamer Levendovszky, Andras Nadas, Istvan Madari, Janos Sztipanovits Institute for Software Integrated Systems at Vanderbilt University
More informationEC (DG SANTE) The ehealth DSI , Solution Provider
EC (DG SANTE) The ehealth DSI 2017-04-05, Solution Provider Materials prepared by the ehdsi Solution Provider Topics tackled 1. CEF ehealth DSI (ehdsi) 2. Use Cases: Patient Summary and eprescription 3.
More informationStudy Setup Administration
Content Study Setup Administration...3 ground...3 Related content...4 Requirements...4 Process information...4 Prerequisite...6 How to Manage Study Setup...6 Site/Patient Enrolment...7 Enrollment menu
More informationPROJECT PERIODIC REPORT
PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT Grant Agreement number: 257403 Project acronym: CUBIST Project title: Combining and Uniting Business Intelligence and Semantic Technologies Funding Scheme: STREP Date of latest
More informationehealth Interoperability Workshop the Government and Expert View CEN/ISSS ehealth Standardization Focus Group, targets and work plan
ehealth Interoperability Workshop the Government and Expert View CEN/ISSS ehealth Standardization Focus Group, targets and work plan Bernd Blobel Chair CEN/ISSS ehealth Standardization Focus Group Task
More informationAQuIP On-line Accrual Reporting System (OARS) User Guide for DCP Consortia 2012
AQuIP On-line Accrual Reporting System (OARS) User Guide for DCP Consortia 2012 This User Guide provides an introduction to the AQuIP On-line Accrual Reporting System (OARS) for the Division of Cancer
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INTERNSHIPS THE WHO INTERAGENCY COORDINATION GROUP ON ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS IN IFMSA
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INTERNSHIPS THE WHO INTERAGENCY COORDINATION GROUP ON ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS IN IFMSA Location: Geneva, Switzerland Duration: 2 months or longer (flexible)
More informationPRISM - FHF The Fred Hollows Foundation
PRISM - FHF The Fred Hollows Foundation MY WORKSPACE USER MANUAL Version 1.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 4 OVERVIEW... 4 THE FHF-PRISM LOGIN SCREEN... 6 LOGGING INTO THE FHF-PRISM... 6 RECOVERING
More informationThe ICT for Health Perspective
INTERNATIONAL ROUND TABLE: Better Brain Health Through Innovative Technology In Europe And North America The ICT for Health Perspective Pēteris Zilgalvis, J.D. Head of Unit, ICT for Health DG Information
More informationResearch Participant Registration System (RPRS) Study Creation Guide
Research Participant Registration System (RPRS) Study Creation Guide Revised August 2016 By Robin Richardson Contents Introduction to RPRS... 3 Creating a Study... 3 1. Details... 4 1.1. Basic Details...
More informationSeptember 26, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20004 2654 Tel: 202 783 8700 Fax: 202 783 8750 www.advamed.org Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers
More informationUser Guide 16-Mar-2018
16-Mar-2018 This document is freely distributable Identification Authors Name Organization Title TMF User Guide and Implementation Guide Sub-Team Version History Version Steering Committee Approval Date
More informationCTSI Module 8 Workshop Introduction to Biomedical Informatics, Part V
CTSI Module 8 Workshop Introduction to Biomedical Informatics, Part V Practical Tools: Data Processing & Analysis William Hsu, PhD Assistant Professor Medical Imaging Informatics Group Dept of Radiological
More informationEHR SECURITY POLICIES & SECURITY SITE ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW WEBINAR. For Viewer Sites
EHR SECURITY POLICIES & SECURITY SITE ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW WEBINAR For Viewer Sites Agenda 1 Introduction and EHR Security Policies Background 2 EHR Security Policy Overview 3 EHR Security Policy Assessment
More informationOffice of Research Integrity / Office of Sponsored Projects IACUC PROTOCOL SUBMISSION GUIDE
Office of Research Integrity / Office of Sponsored Projects IACUC PROTOCOL SUBMISSION GUIDE Coeus Lite 4.5.1.Px Document Version 3 Updated May 2016 Table of Contents ABOUT COEUS... 3 o About the Coeus
More informationParticipant User Guide, Version 2.6
Developers Integration Lab (DIL) Participant User Guide, Version 2.6 3/17/2013 REVISION HISTORY Author Date Description of Change 0.1 Laura Edens Mario Hyland 9/19/2011 Initial Release 1.0 Michael Brown
More informationCovisint MIPS Quick Start User Guide
Covisint MIPS Quick Start User Guide The Quick Start instructions explain the MIPS registration process, collecting and entering patient data online, and the submission process. Updated December 2017 Table
More informationPaper DS07 PhUSE 2017 CDISC Transport Standards - A Glance. Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences
Paper DS07 PhUSE 2017 CDISC Transport Standards - A Glance Giri Balasubramanian, PRA Health Sciences Edwin Ponraj Thangarajan, PRA Health Sciences Agenda Paper Abstract CDISC Standards Types Why Transport
More information(60 min) California State Updates
(60 min) California State Updates Presenters: 30 min Speranza Avram, CEO, CalHIPSO: EHR status & uptake in CA 20 min David A. Minch, President & COO, HealthShare Bay Area: HIE status 10 min Questions 1
More informationInForm Functionality Reference Manual for Sites. Version 1.0
InForm Functionality Reference Manual for Sites Version 1.0 1-Mar-2012 2012 by Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All Rights Reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form
More informationHITSP/IS06. January 25, 2010 Version 2.0. Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel. Population Perspective Technical Committee.
January 25, 2010 Version 2.0 HITSP/IS06 Submitted to: Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Submitted by: Technical Committee DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY Version Number Description of Change Name
More information