LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for MPTCP draft-barik-mptcp-lisa-01
|
|
|
- Lindsey Simpson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for draft-barik-mptcp-lisa-1 Runa Barik (UiO), Simone Ferlin (SRL), Michael Welzl (UiO) Multipath IETF Meeting Berlin, Germany th July 16 IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 1 / 16
2 What is new? A paper 1 published. A patch file on Updated by draft-barik-mptcp-lisa-1 Presented in IETF94, Yokahama, Japan. 1 Runa Barik, Michael Welzl, Simone Ferlin and Ozgu Alay, LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for, in IEEE ICC 16 IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 2 / 16
3 is very simple; it is just an update to the very first slow-start of new subflows. When a new subflow joins, we find one available subflow that could give a part of its cwnd to the new subflow. If there is no subflow, assign the default values based on RFC 339 and RFC The goal is to reduce temporary aggressiveness, and losses at the end of slow-start. IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 3 / 16
4 Outline Feedback from IETF94: Slowing down slow start will reduce retransmissions, does not work in large delay-bw environments. See graphs relating to BDP. Current parameters are unrealistic. What is now? Performance of LISA in Shared and Non-Shared Bottleneck, varying: Number of subflows RTT Bandwidth LISA behavior for a large transfer IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 4 / 16
5 Topology Server Eth Eth1 Eth Bottleneck Link Client (a) Shared bottleneck Bottleneck Link Server Bottleneck Link (b) Non-Shared bottleneck Client IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 5 / 16
6 Shared Bottleneck: Number of subflows 1 8 Base RTT=ms BW=5Mbps (c) Mean-completion time (2 subflows) (e) Retransmissions BW=5Mbps Base RTT=ms 8 1 (d) Mean-completion time (4 subflows) (f) Retransmissions IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 6 / 16
7 Shared Bottleneck: RTT Base RTT=1ms BW=5Mbps (a) Mean-completion time (b) Retransmissions sum of cwnd Transfer-size=KB Time (in sec) Time (in sec) IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 7 / 16 sum of cwnd Transfer-size=9KB
8 Shared Bottleneck: RTT Base RTT=ms (a) Mean completion time (b) Retransmissions IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 8 / 16
9 Shared Bottleneck: Bandwidth BW=Mbps Base RTT=ms (c) Mean completion time (d) Retransmissions BW=45Mbps Base RTT=ms IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 9 /
10 Non-Shared Bottleneck: RTT 1 8 Base RTT=ms BW=5Mbps (a) Mean completion time (b) Retransmissions BW=5Mbps Base RTT=ms IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for /
11 Non-Shared Bottleneck: Bandwidth 5 4 Base RTT=ms 3 2 BW=35Mbps (a) Mean completion time (b) Retransmissions BW=45Mbps Base RTT=ms IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 11 / 16
12 Shared Bottleneck: Large transfer R ss (in pkts) Bandwidth=5Mbps Base RTT (in ms) (a) Vary RTT R ss (in pkts) 2 1 Base RTT=ms Bandwidth (in Mbps) (b) Vary Bandwidth Number of Retransmissions at the end of SS IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 12 / 16
13 Non-Shared Bottleneck: Large transfer 3 3 R ss (in pkts) 2 1 Bandwidth=5Mbps R ss (in pkts) 2 1 Base RTT=ms Base RTT (in ms) (a) Vary RTT Bandwidth (in Mbps) (b) Vary Bandwidth Number of Retransmissions at the end of SS IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 13 / 16
14 Thank you! IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 14 / 16
15 LISA in Shared Bottlenck Server Eth Eth1 Bottleneck Link (a) Shared bottleneck LISA behaves less aggressive than Eth Client Retransmissions sum of cwnd 8 7 Transfer-size=5KB LISA Time (in sec) (b) Total cwnd LISA Time (in sec) Transfer-size=5KB IETF96 LISA: A LinkedTotal Slow-Start retransmissions Algorithm for 15 / 16
16 LISA in Non-Shared Bottlenck Server Bottleneck Link Bottleneck Link (a) Non-Shared bottleneck cwnd (in packets) 7 Client Retransmissions Time (in sec) main flow subflow 5 LISA main flow LISA subflow main flow subflow LISA main flow LISA subflow Transfer-size=KB Time (in sec) (b) Retransmissions IETF96 LISA: A Linked Slow-Start Algorithm for 16 / 16
BLEST: Blocking Estimation-based MPTCP Scheduler for Heterogeneous Networks. Simone Ferlin, Ozgu Alay, Olivier Mehani and Roksana Boreli
BLEST: Blocking Estimation-based MPTCP Scheduler for Heterogeneous Networks Simone Ferlin, Ozgu Alay, Olivier Mehani and Roksana Boreli Multipath TCP: What is it? TCP/IP is built around the notion of a
TCP with dynamic FEC For High Delay and Lossy Networks. Simone Ferlin and Ozgu Alay Simula Research Laboratory, Norway
TCP with dynamic FEC For High Delay and Lossy Networks Simone Ferlin and Ozgu Alay Simula Research Laboratory, Norway TCP: Loss detection and recovery - Introduction TCP has been regularly changed over
Implementation and Evaluation of Coupled Congestion Control for Multipath TCP
Implementation and Evaluation of Coupled Congestion Control for Multipath TCP Régel González Usach and Mirja Kühlewind Institute of Communication Networks and Computer Engineering (IKR), University of
Probe or Wait : Handling tail losses using Multipath TCP
Probe or Wait : Handling tail losses using Multipath TCP Kiran Yedugundla, Per Hurtig, Anna Brunstrom 12/06/2017 Probe or Wait : Handling tail losses using Multipath TCP Outline Introduction Handling tail
Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation
Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation Quentin De Coninck, Olivier Bonaventure quentin.deconinck@uclouvain.be multipath-quic.org Outline The QUIC protocol Designing Multipath for QUIC Experimental Design
Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation
Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation Quentin De Coninck, Olivier Bonaventure quentin.deconinck@uclouvain.be multipath-quic.org QUIC = Quick UDP Internet Connection TCP/TLS1.3 atop UDP Stream multiplexing
Implementation Experiments on HighSpeed and Parallel TCP
Implementation Experiments on HighSpeed and TCP Zongsheng Zhang Go Hasegawa Masayuki Murata Osaka University Outline Introduction Background of and g Why to evaluate in a test-bed network A refined algorithm
One More Bit Is Enough
One More Bit Is Enough Yong Xia, RPI Lakshmi Subramanian, UCB Ion Stoica, UCB Shiv Kalyanaraman, RPI SIGCOMM 05, Philadelphia, PA 08 / 23 / 2005 Motivation #1: TCP doesn t work well in high b/w or delay
Tuning the Aggressive Slow-Start Behavior of MPTCP for Short Flows
Received November 29, 2018, accepted December 7, 2018, date of publication January 1, 2019, date of current version January 16, 2019. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889339 Tuning the Aggressive
Why Your Application only Uses 10Mbps Even the Link is 1Gbps?
Why Your Application only Uses 10Mbps Even the Link is 1Gbps? Contents Introduction Background Information Overview of the Issue Bandwidth-Delay Product Verify Solution How to Tell Round Trip Time (RTT)
Congestion Control of MPTCP: Performance Issues and a Possible Solution
Congestion Control of MPTCP: Performance Issues and a Possible Solution Ramin Khalili, T-Labs/TU-Berlin, Germany R.khalili, N. Gast, M. Popovic, J.-Y Le Boudec, draft-khalili-mptcp-performance-issues-02
TCP Modifications for Congestion Exposure
TCP Modifications for Congestion Exposure ConEx 87. IETF Berlin July 27, 2013 draft-ietf-conex-tcp-modifications-04 Mirja Kühlewind Richard Scheffenegger
Model-based Measurements Of Network Loss
Model-based Measurements Of Network Loss June 28, 2013 Mirja Kühlewind mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de Universität Stuttgart Institute of Communication Networks and Computer Engineering (IKR) Prof.
Progress on Practical Shared Bottleneck Detection for Coupled Congestion Control
Progress on Practical Shared Bottleneck Detection for Coupled Congestion Control David Hayes (UiO) { Simone Ferlin (SRL) and Michael Welzl (UiO) } RMCAT 4 March 24 / 6 Background Problem Flows traversing
WB-RTO: A Window-Based Retransmission Timeout. Ioannis Psaras, Vassilis Tsaoussidis Demokritos University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece
WB-RTO: A Window-Based Retransmission Timeout Ioannis Psaras, Vassilis Tsaoussidis Demokritos University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece Motivation and Contribution We observe that retransmission scheduling
Intended status: Standards Track. M. Welzl. University of Oslo. June 27, 2016
Multipath TCP Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track Expires: December 29, 2016 R. Barik University of Oslo S. Ferlin Simula Research Laboratory M. Welzl University of Oslo June 27, 2016 A Linked
MPTCP: Design and Deployment. Day 11
MPTCP: Design and Deployment Day 11 Use of Multipath TCP in ios 7 Multipath TCP in ios 7 Primary TCP connection over WiFi Backup TCP connection over cellular data Enables fail-over Improves performance
STMS: Improving MPTCP Throughput Under Heterogenous Networks
STMS: Improving MPTCP Throughput Under Heterogenous Networks Hang Shi 1, Yong Cui 1, Xin Wang 2, Yuming Hu 1, Minglong Dai 1, anzhao Wang 3, Kai Zheng 3 1 Tsinghua University, 2 Stony Brook University,
Reasons not to Parallelize TCP Connections for Fast Long-Distance Networks
Reasons not to Parallelize TCP Connections for Fast Long-Distance Networks Zongsheng Zhang Go Hasegawa Masayuki Murata Osaka University Contents Introduction Analysis of parallel TCP mechanism Numerical
SharkFest 17 Europe. My TCP ain t your TCP. Simon Lindermann. Stack behavior back then and today. Miele & Cie KG.
SharkFest 17 Europe My TCP ain t your TCP Stack behavior back then and today 9th November 2017 Simon Lindermann Miele & Cie KG #sf17eu Estoril, Portugal#sf17eu My TCP Estoril, ain tportugal your TCP 7-10
TCP SIAD: Congestion Control supporting Low Latency and High Speed
TCP SIAD: Congestion Control supporting Low Latency and High Speed Mirja Kühlewind IETF91 Honolulu ICCRG Nov 11, 2014 Outline Current Research Challenges Scalability in
Studying Congestion Control with Explicit Router Feedback Using Hardware-based Network Emulator
Studying Congestion Control with Explicit Router Feedback Using Hardware-based Network Emulator Kiyohide Nakauchi Katsushi Kobayashi National Institute of Information and Communications Technology 4 2
Implementing and Experimenting with XCP
Implementing and Experimenting with XCP Ted Faber, Aaron Falk, Yuri Pryadkin, Bob Braden, Eric Coe, Aman Kapoor, Amit Yajurvedi, Nirav Jasapara USC/ISI USC Viterbi School of Engineering 28 Sept 2005 Outline
Exercises TCP/IP Networking With Solutions
Exercises TCP/IP Networking With Solutions Jean-Yves Le Boudec Fall 2009 3 Module 3: Congestion Control Exercise 3.2 1. Assume that a TCP sender, called S, does not implement fast retransmit, but does
TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification RFC3448bis
TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification RFC3448bis draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-02.txt S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer Testing and simulations from A. Sathiaseelan July 2007,
Performance-oriented Congestion Control
Performance-oriented Congestion Control Mo Dong, Qingxi Li, Doron Zarchy*, P. Brighten Godfrey and Michael Schapira* University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign *Hebrew University of Jerusalem Qingxi Li
8. TCP Congestion Control
8. TCP Congestion Control 1 TCP Congestion Control Slow-start increase Multiplicative decrease Congestion avoidance Measurement of variation Exponential timer backoff 2002 Yanghee Choi 2 Congestion Control
CS268: Beyond TCP Congestion Control
TCP Problems CS68: Beyond TCP Congestion Control Ion Stoica February 9, 004 When TCP congestion control was originally designed in 1988: - Key applications: FTP, E-mail - Maximum link bandwidth: 10Mb/s
Performance-oriented Congestion Control
Performance-oriented Congestion Control Mo Dong, Qingxi Li, Doron Zarchy*, P. Brighten Godfrey and Michael Schapira* University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign *Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mo Dong Qingxi
Combating Packet Reordering in Vertical Handoff using Cross-layer Notifications to TCP
Copyright 2008 IEEE. Reprinted with permission. Published in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Wireless and Mobile Computing (WiMob) 2008 Combating Packet Reordering in Vertical Handoff using Cross-layer Notifications
OpenTCP: Combining Congestion Controls of Parallel TCP Connections
OpenTCP: Combining Congestion Controls of Parallel TCP Connections Safiqul Islam, Michael Welzl, Stein Gjessing Networks and Distributed Systems Group, Department of Informatics University of Oslo, Norway
RMCAT - Shared Bottleneck Detection and Coupled Congestion Control vs. QoS for WebRTC Michael Welzl
RMCAT - Shared Bottleneck Detection and Coupled Congestion Control vs. QoS for WebRTC Michael Welzl CAIA, Swinburne University, Melbourne 4. December 2014 Contributors Main people behind this work: Shared
Project Details. Jiasi Chen CS 179i: Project in Computer Science (Networks) Lectures: Monday 3:10-4pm in Spieth 1307
Project Details Jiasi Chen CS 179i: Project in Computer Science (Networks) Lectures: Monday 3:10-4pm in Spieth 1307 http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~jiasi/teaching/cs179i_winter16/ 1 Outline Virtual reality Video
Master s Thesis. TCP Congestion Control Mechanisms for Achieving Predictable Throughput
Master s Thesis Title TCP Congestion Control Mechanisms for Achieving Predictable Throughput Supervisor Prof. Hirotaka Nakano Author Kana Yamanegi February 14th, 2007 Department of Information Networking
Congestion Control Without a Startup Phase
Congestion Control Without a Startup Phase Dan Liu 1, Mark Allman 2, Shudong Jin 1, Limin Wang 3 1. Case Western Reserve University, 2. International Computer Science Institute, 3. Bell Labs PFLDnet 2007
Coupled Conges,on Control for RTP Media. Safiqul Islam, Michael Welzl, Stein Gjessing and Naeem Khademi Department of Informa,cs University of Oslo
Coupled Conges,on Control for RTP Media Safiqul Islam, Michael Welzl, Stein Gjessing and Naeem Khademi Department of Informa,cs University of Oslo Problem statement Each Flow has its own Conges@on Control
Congestion Control for High Bandwidth-Delay Product Networks
Congestion Control for High Bandwidth-Delay Product Networks Presented by: Emad Shihab Overview Introduce the problem of XCP (what the protocol achieves) (how the protocol achieves this) The problem! TCP
TCP modifications for Congestion Exposure
TCP modifications for Congestion Exposure ConEx 81. IETF Quebec July 27, 2011 draft-kuehlewind-conex-accurate-ecn-00 draft-kuehlewind-conex-tcp-modifications-00 Mirja Kühlewind
Flow and Congestion Control Marcos Vieira
Flow and Congestion Control 2014 Marcos Vieira Flow Control Part of TCP specification (even before 1988) Goal: not send more data than the receiver can handle Sliding window protocol Receiver uses window
An Evaluation of Adaptive Multimedia Communication from a QoS Perspective
U Linz Telekooperation - 1 An Evaluation of Adaptive Multimedia Communication from a QoS Perspective Michael Welzl Johannes Kepler University Linz / Austria Max Mühlhäuser TU Darmstadt Germany U Linz Telekooperation
CSCI-1680 Transport Layer III Congestion Control Strikes Back Rodrigo Fonseca
CSCI-1680 Transport Layer III Congestion Control Strikes Back Rodrigo Fonseca Based partly on lecture notes by David Mazières, Phil Levis, John Jannotti, Ion Stoica Last Time Flow Control Congestion Control
Transport Over IP. CSCI 690 Michael Hutt New York Institute of Technology
Transport Over IP CSCI 690 Michael Hutt New York Institute of Technology Transport Over IP What is a transport protocol? Choosing to use a transport protocol Ports and Addresses Datagrams UDP What is a
Recap. TCP connection setup/teardown Sliding window, flow control Retransmission timeouts Fairness, max-min fairness AIMD achieves max-min fairness
Recap TCP connection setup/teardown Sliding window, flow control Retransmission timeouts Fairness, max-min fairness AIMD achieves max-min fairness 81 Feedback Signals Several possible signals, with different
CS519: Computer Networks. Lecture 5, Part 4: Mar 29, 2004 Transport: TCP congestion control
: Computer Networks Lecture 5, Part 4: Mar 29, 2004 Transport: TCP congestion control TCP performance We ve seen how TCP the protocol works Sequencing, receive window, connection setup and teardown And
Congestion Control For Coded TCP. Doug Leith
Congestion Control For Coded TCP Doug Leith Outline Why do error-correction coding at the transport layer? Congestion control on lossy paths Implementation & performance measurements Why error-correction
file:///c:/users/hpguo/dropbox/website/teaching/fall 2017/CS4470/H...
1 of 9 11/26/2017, 11:28 AM Homework 3 solutions 1. A window holds bytes 2001 to 5000. The next byte to be sent is 3001. Draw a figure to show the situation of the window after the following two events:
XCP: explicit Control Protocol
XCP: explicit Control Protocol Dina Katabi MIT Lab for Computer Science dk@mit.edu www.ana.lcs.mit.edu/dina Sharing the Internet Infrastructure Is fundamental Much research in Congestion Control, QoS,
Making TCP more Robust against Packet Reordering
Making TCP more Robust against Packet Reordering Alexander Zimmermann Lennart Schulte TCPM, IETF-9, Honolulu, HI, USA November, 24 TCPM s feedback
How$speedy$is$SPDY? Xiao%(Sophia)%Wang,$Aruna$Balasubramanian,$Arvind$ Krishnamurthy,$David$Wetherall$ University*of*Washington*
HowspeedyisSPDY? Xiao%(Sophia)%Wang,ArunaBalasubramanian,Arvind Krishnamurthy,DavidWetherall University*of*Washington* 1995 2000 2005 2010 2014 HTTP/1.1:(The(standard( to(load(web(pages HTTP/1.1'becomes(slow(
HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion Windows draft-floyd-tcp-highspeed-00.txt
HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion Windows draft-floyd-tcp-highspeed-00.txt Sally Floyd July 17, 2002 TSVWG, Yokohama IETF 1 HighSpeed TCP: Joint work with Sylvia Ratnasamy and Scott Shenker at ICIR. Additional
Internet Engineering Task Force. Intended status: Informational Expires: August 20, 2012 Technical University Berlin February 17, 2012
Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft Intended status: Informational Expires: August 20, 2012 T. Ayar B. Rathke L. Budzisz A. Wolisz Technical University Berlin February 17, 2012 A Transparent
Congestion control mechanism of TCP for achieving predictable throughput
Congestion control mechanism of TCP for achieving predictable throughput Kana Yamanegi Go Hasegawa Masayuki Murata Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University 1-5 Yamadaoka,
Design and Performance Evaluation of High Efficient TCP for HBDP Networks
Design and Performance Evaluation of High Efficient TCP for HBDP Networks TaeJoon Park 1, ManKyu Park 2,JaeYongLee 2,, and ByungChul Kim 2 1 Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute 161 Gajong-Dong,
Revisiting Congestion Control for Multipath TCP with Shared Bottleneck Detection
Revisiting Congestion Control for Multipath TCP with Shared Bottleneck Detection Simone Ferlin, Özgü Alay, Thomas Dreibholz Simula Research Laboratory {ferlin,ozgu,dreibh}@simula.no David A. Hayes, Michael
QUIC evaluation. HTTP Workshop. 28 July 2015 Münster - Germany. G. Carlucci, L. De Cicco, S. Mascolo. Politecnico di Bari, Italy
QUIC evaluation HTTP Workshop 28 July 2015 Münster - Germany G. Carlucci, L. De Cicco, S. Mascolo Politecnico di Bari, Italy Goal FOCUS OF THE TALK We want to answer to these questions: Can QUIC be safely
BBR Congestion Control: IETF 100 Update: BBR in shallow buffers
BBR Congestion Control: IETF 100 Update: BBR in shallow buffers Neal Cardwell, Yuchung Cheng, C. Stephen Gunn, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Ian Swett, Jana Iyengar, Victor Vasiliev Van Jacobson https://groups.google.com/d/forum/bbr-dev
Communication Networks
Communication Networks Spring 2018 Laurent Vanbever nsg.ee.ethz.ch ETH Zürich (D-ITET) April 30 2018 Materials inspired from Scott Shenker & Jennifer Rexford Last week on Communication Networks We started
CS644 Advanced Networks
What we know so far CS644 Advanced Networks Lecture 6 Beyond TCP Congestion Control Andreas Terzis TCP Congestion control based on AIMD window adjustment [Jac88] Saved Internet from congestion collapse
Characterizing Slow Start in High Speed Networks
Characterizing Slow Start in High Speed Networks Kazumi Kumazoe (HMC), Masato Tsuru, Yuji Oie Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan Mario Gerla University of California, Los Angeles, USA November 17 th,
Experimental Evaluation of Multipath TCP Schedulers
Experimental Evaluation of Multipath TCP Schedulers Christoph Paasch 1, Simone Ferlin 2, Özgü Alay 2 and Olivier Bonaventure 1 1 ICTEAM, UCLouvain, Belgium 2 Simula Research Laboratory, Fornebu, Norway
CUBIC. Qian HE (Steve) CS 577 Prof. Bob Kinicki
CUBIC Qian HE (Steve) CS 577 Prof. Bob Kinicki Agenda Brief Introduction of CUBIC Prehistory of CUBIC Standard TCP BIC CUBIC Conclusion 1 Brief Introduction CUBIC is a less aggressive and more systematic
Computer Networking Introduction
Computer Networking Introduction Halgurd S. Maghdid Software Engineering Department Koya University-Koya, Kurdistan-Iraq Lecture No.11 Chapter 3 outline 3.1 transport-layer services 3.2 multiplexing and
Testing the Channel Aggregation Capability of the MPT Multipath Communication Library
Testing the Channel Aggregation Capability of the MPT Multipath Communication Library Gábor Lencse Department of Telecommunications Széchenyi István University Győr, Hungary lencse@sze.hu Ákos Kovács Department
Performance Comparison of TFRC and TCP
ENSC 833-3: NETWORK PROTOCOLS AND PERFORMANCE CMPT 885-3: SPECIAL TOPICS: HIGH-PERFORMANCE NETWORKS FINAL PROJECT Performance Comparison of TFRC and TCP Spring 2002 Yi Zheng and Jian Wen {zyi,jwena}@cs.sfu.ca
6.033 Computer System Engineering
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 6.033 Computer System Engineering Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 6.033 Lecture 13 Sam
MPTCP Application Considerations. draft-scharf-mptcp-api-00.txt. Michael Scharf Alan Ford
MPTCP Application Considerations draft-scharf-mptcp-api-00.txt Michael Scharf Alan Ford November 9, 2009 Scope From MPTCP Charter: e. An extended
Utilizing Datacenter Networks: Centralized or Distributed Solutions?
Utilizing Datacenter Networks: Centralized or Distributed Solutions? Costin Raiciu Department of Computer Science University Politehnica of Bucharest We ve gotten used to great applications Enabling Such
Outline Computer Networking. TCP slow start. TCP modeling. TCP details AIMD. Congestion Avoidance. Lecture 18 TCP Performance Peter Steenkiste
Outline 15-441 Computer Networking Lecture 18 TCP Performance Peter Steenkiste Fall 2010 www.cs.cmu.edu/~prs/15-441-f10 TCP congestion avoidance TCP slow start TCP modeling TCP details 2 AIMD Distributed,
Report on Transport Protocols over Mismatched-rate Layer-1 Circuits with 802.3x Flow Control
Report on Transport Protocols over Mismatched-rate Layer-1 Circuits with 82.3x Flow Control Helali Bhuiyan, Mark McGinley, Tao Li, Malathi Veeraraghavan University of Virginia Email: {helali, mem5qf, taoli,
SharkFest'17 US. Understanding Throughput & TCP Windows. A Walk-Through of the Factors that can limit TCP Throughput Performance
SharkFest'17 US Understanding Throughput & TCP Windows A Walk-Through of the Factors that can limit TCP Throughput Performance Kary Rogers Director, Staff Engineering Riverbed Technology Agenda TCP ownership
Measuring end-to-end bandwidth with Iperf using Web100
Measuring end-to-end bandwidth with Iperf using Web Ajay Tirumala Les Cottrell Tom Dunigan CS Dept. SLAC CSMD University of Illinois Stanford University ORNL Urbana, IL 6181 Menlo Park, CA 9425 Oak Ridge,
An Issue in NewReno After Fast Recovery. Yoshifumi Nishida
An Issue in NewReno After Fast Recovery Yoshifumi Nishida nishida@dyyno.com RFC3782 Definition Definition of Fast Retransmit and Fast Recovery Algorithm (Step 5 of fast retransmit fast recovery) When a
Chapter 3 Transport Layer
Chapter 3 Transport Layer 1 Chapter 3 outline 3.1 Transport-layer services 3.2 Multiplexing and demultiplexing 3.3 Connectionless transport: UDP 3.4 Principles of reliable data transfer 3.5 Connection-oriented
Transmission Control Protocol. ITS 413 Internet Technologies and Applications
Transmission Control Protocol ITS 413 Internet Technologies and Applications Contents Overview of TCP (Review) TCP and Congestion Control The Causes of Congestion Approaches to Congestion Control TCP Congestion
Marooned Magic Numbers An Adaptive Congestion Control Architecture
Marooned Magic Numbers An Adaptive Congestion Control Architecture Somaya Arianfar, Pasi Sarolahti, and Jörg Ott Aalto University, Department of Communications and Networking {firstname.lastname}@aalto.fi
Lecture 15: Transport Layer Congestion Control
Lecture 15: Transport Layer Congestion Control COMP 332, Spring 2018 Victoria Manfredi Acknowledgements: materials adapted from Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 7 th edition: 1996-2016, J.F Kurose
TCP Congestion Control
TCP Congestion Control What is Congestion The number of packets transmitted on the network is greater than the capacity of the network Causes router buffers (finite size) to fill up packets start getting
TCP Congestion Control
What is Congestion TCP Congestion Control The number of packets transmitted on the network is greater than the capacity of the network Causes router buffers (finite size) to fill up packets start getting
CTCP (Circuit TCP) v1.0
Outline C (Circuit ) v1.0 Helali Bhuiyan and Malathi Veeraraghavan {helali,mv5g}@virginia.edu Purpose of C Requirements to run C code C Components C Operation C details C Usage Usage of C across an Internet
Improving the Robustness of TCP to Non-Congestion Events
Improving the Robustness of TCP to Non-Congestion Events Presented by : Sally Floyd floyd@acm.org For the Authors: Sumitha Bhandarkar A. L. Narasimha Reddy {sumitha,reddy}@ee.tamu.edu Problem Statement
Congestion Avoidance and Control. Rohan Tabish and Zane Ma
Congestion Avoidance and Control Rohan Tabish and Zane Ma TCP is self-clocking Self-clocking systems should be robust Congestion collapse Internet had first of what became a series of congestion collapses
TCP modifications for Congestion Exposure
TCP modifications for Congestion Exposure ConEx 82. IETF Taipei November 17, 2011 draft-kuehlewind-conex-tcp-modifications-01 Mirja Kühlewind Richard Scheffenegger
Fall 2012: FCM 708 Bridge Foundation I
Fall 2012: FCM 708 Bridge Foundation I Prof. Shamik Sengupta Instructor s Website: http://jjcweb.jjay.cuny.edu/ssengupta/ Blackboard Website: https://bbhosted.cuny.edu/ Intro to Computer Networking Transport
Hybrid Control and Switched Systems. Lecture #17 Hybrid Systems Modeling of Communication Networks
Hybrid Control and Switched Systems Lecture #17 Hybrid Systems Modeling of Communication Networks João P. Hespanha University of California at Santa Barbara Motivation Why model network traffic? to validate
Designing a Resource Pooling Transport Protocol
Designing a Resource Pooling Transport Protocol Michio Honda, Keio University Elena Balandina, Nokia Research Center Pasi Sarolahti, Nokia Research Center Lars Eggert, Nokia Research Center Global Internet
Brief Overview and Background
Brief Overview and Background In this assignment you will be studying the performance behavior of TCP, using ns 2. At the end of this exercise, you should be able to write simple scripts in ns 2 as well
TCP Congestion Control 65KB W
TCP Congestion Control 65KB W TO 3DA 3DA TO 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 3 3 1 SS SS CA SS CA TCP s Congestion Window Maintenance TCP maintains a congestion window (cwnd), based on packets Sender s window is limited
Measuring end-to-end bandwidth with Iperf using Web100
Presented at Passive and Active Monitoring Workshop (PAM 23), 4/6/23-4/8/23, San Diego, CA, USA SLAC-PUB-9733 April 23 Measuring end-to-end bandwidth with Iperf using Web1 Ajay Tirumala Les Cottrell Tom
TCP Congestion Control
6.033, Spring 2014 TCP Congestion Control Dina Katabi & Sam Madden nms.csail.mit.edu/~dina Sharing the Internet How do you manage resources in a huge system like the Internet, where users with different
CONCURRENT MULTIPATH TRANSFER USING TRANSPORT LAYER MULTIHOMING: PERFORMANCE UNDER VARYING BANDWIDTH PROPORTIONS
CONCURRENT MULTIPATH TRANSFER USING TRANSPORT LAYER MULTIHOMING: PERFORMANCE UNDER VARYING BANDWIDTH PROPORTIONS Janardhan R. Iyengar, Paul D. Amer Protocol Engineering Lab, Computer and Information Sciences,
A Hybrid Systems Modeling Framework for Fast and Accurate Simulation of Data Communication Networks. Motivation
A Hybrid Systems Modeling Framework for Fast and Accurate Simulation of Data Communication Networks Stephan Bohacek João P. Hespanha Junsoo Lee Katia Obraczka University of Delaware University of Calif.
A proposal for MPTCP Robust session Establishment (MPTCP RobE) enable full multipath capability for MPTCP Markus Amend, Eckard Bogenfeld, Andreas
A proposal for MPTCP Robust session Establishment (MPTCP RobE) enable full multipath capability for MPTCP Markus Amend, Eckard Bogenfeld, Andreas Matz 18 July 2017 Agenda 01 The role of the initial flow
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET) International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976 ISSN 0976-6480 (Print) ISSN
Congestion Control In The Internet Part 2: How it is implemented in TCP. JY Le Boudec 2014
1 Congestion Control In The Internet Part 2: How it is implemented in TCP JY Le Boudec 2014 Contents 1. Congestion control in TCP 2. The fairness of TCP 3. The loss throughput formula 4. Explicit Congestion
Topics. TCP sliding window protocol TCP PUSH flag TCP slow start Bulk data throughput
Topics TCP sliding window protocol TCP PUSH flag TCP slow start Bulk data throughput 2 Introduction In this chapter we will discuss TCP s form of flow control called a sliding window protocol It allows
TCP OVER AD HOC NETWORK
TCP OVER AD HOC NETWORK Special course on data communications and networks Zahed Iqbal (ziqbal@cc.hut.fi) Agenda Introduction Versions of TCP TCP in wireless network TCP in Ad Hoc network Conclusion References
Experimental Evaluation of Multipath TCP Schedulers
Experimental Evaluation of Multipath TCP Schedulers Christoph Paasch ICTEAM, UCLouvain Belgium Ozgu Alay Simula Research Laboratory Fornebu, Norway Simone Ferlin Simula Research Laboratory Fornebu, Norway
Implementing TCP SACK Conservative Loss Recovery Algorithm within a NDN Consumer
Implementing TCP SACK Conservative Loss Recovery Algorithm within a NDN Consumer Shuo Yang 1. Design Consumer uses packet timeout as signal of congestion; Consumer reacts to one packet loss event per RTT
0-RTT TCP Convert Protocol
0-RTT TCP Convert Protocol draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-01 IETF101, March 2018 O. Bonaventure, M. Boucadair, B. Peirens, S. Seo, A. Nandugudi Converter Initial Motivation More MPTCP enabled clients than
Congestion Control In The Internet Part 2: How it is implemented in TCP. JY Le Boudec 2014
1 Congestion Control In The Internet Part 2: How it is implemented in TCP JY Le Boudec 2014 Contents 1. Congestion control in TCP 2. The fairness of TCP 3. The loss throughput formula 4. Explicit Congestion